Moving on ...
Bumped from the Diaries. With this piece from resident sage, steeler lifer, the Patriots game has been put to rest. -Blitz-
Disappointing, interesting, revealing ... and, in a bizarre way, reassuring. Those are the four words that sum up my view of the loss to the Patriots.
Disappointing ... of course. The Steelers wasted a good half of football by following it up with their worst half of the year, letting the Patriots off the hook in a winable game. As blitzburgh noted, the failure to convert third-down on their last FG drive of the first half contributed to a potential seven-point swing in the scoreboard. Even at 13-17 we were still in the game. It didn't become unlikely to win until we punted for the second time of the second half, and non-winable until we failed on fourth and goal.
Interesting ... always when you see your team measured against the best. Always, when you get a chance to see Brady's mind at work. He processes information and executes plays within a system that makes offensive production seem ridiculously easy. It's an offense that is arguably the best of all time. They did not have a significant negative play on offense in the entire game.
Revealing ... always when you clearly see weaknesses and can better evaluate your personnel and coaching philosophy. Casey Hampton, for example, is great against any team that needs to run the football ... which is just about every other team in the NFL. He will be of huge importance against Jacksonville. Against New England, he is almost totally useless. Anthony Smith and Tyrone Carter are what they are ... backup safeties who can be picked on. Farrior is slowing down, Haggans is wearing some kind of camo outfit that makes him invisible, Holmes is not yet a great receiver, Faneca is eminently replaceable, The OC and DC and HC often fail to make adjustments during a game.
For example, the play calling on short yardage in two key situations reflected the perception prior to the game of the team struggling to run the ball in short-yardage situations. Yet during the game, Davenport was effective in short yardage, Parker was full of juice and Ben had run the ball effectively. Ergo, you change your preconceived notions and instead of resorting to pre-planned situational passes and trick plays, pound the ball behind Smith and perhaps Starks lined up outside Smith, or at worst give Ben an opportunity to roll out. What you DONT do on 4th and goal is run laterally with a WR taking an inside handoff close to the line of scrimmage, where any one of four or five potential play-killiing blocking failures can happen.
On defense, it became obvious that NE had no intention of running the ball. So GIVE them the run. Take out your run-stopping NT. IGNORE play-action. FORGET an inside pass rush with LBs crossing around a mass of interior linemen. Play wide defensive fronts. Overload the outside pass rush with a DB. Drop nine back in coverage once in a while. Keep EVERY receiver in front of you. Let THEM run time off the clock while the game is close. But no. As creative as the Steelers can sometimes be in their blitzing schemes, we continued to play STEELER defense rather than a defense adjusted to stop a team that plays the game in a way no one else does.
And how is all this reassuring. For one thing, we won't play the Patriots again unless it's a playoff game, and we have learned more about playing against the Patriots then they have learned about us. If there is a second meeting, it will be a closer game and possibly a differently result. More importantly, we continued to show improvement in run blocking and running. FWP had his best game of the year. His legs are clearly live. We showed some adjustments in run selection, getting him to the edges. We got him involved in the passing game. Ben was willing to run. The OL had a very good run-blocking game and relatively few pass protection breakdowns. Simmons had a good game (again) and Smith bounced back. Our basic coverage of kicks and punts, overall, was good. Punt cover has been excellent for several weeks, minus the one poor punt in OT vs. the Jets. We have made some play-calling adjustments to account for OL weaknesses. I'm not sure I would agree with datruth that those areas will inevitably kill us in a playoff game. Not saying they couldn't, but I'm seeing improvement that reflects Tomlin's approach to internal problem-solving being a process of hard work, diligence and faith in your players. This is the Steeler way and it will work.
The Jacksonville game is a must win, in my books. It's the last home game. It's against a good team. We need to reassert confidence in the ability to execute a winning game-plan against a quality opponent. A loss could contribute to us ending up as the sixth-seeded playoff team. And that, my friends, would not set up a good playoff scenario for a team stumbling over its own feet the final month of the season. But I'm confident of a win because smash-mouth physical football will bring out the best in our defense, especially at home, and Ben will outplay Garrard.
A question for the crowd regarding the status of Woodley's injury. If he's healthy, he's a guy who can help make a difference immediately, even if it's only for a dozen snaps a game.
0 recs |
19 comments
Comments
Woodley
by schnifin on Dec 11, 2007 2:50 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
right on Lifer
I totally agree with both of you, some kind of adjustments have to be made when the Steelers play a 'pass happy' team. Big Snack is an unmovable force against the run but he's not a pass rusher and that isn't going to get better as he ages. As much as we all like Aaron Smith he's in pretty much the same role as he's gotten older. We've all said pressuring Brady is a key to beating the Pats, but what we failed to add was that you have to be able to pressure with the DL, not by blitzing 5. This isn't a new problem either, how many times can you remember this team getting burned by 'pass happy' systems?
by cgolden on Dec 11, 2007 2:52 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Spot on analysis
The Steelers defense is built to stop the pro set running game. The money is spent on the best linebacking talent that can be drafted, signed or occassionally traded for. The DB's are not the best players at their position in college or the pro's. Rod Woodson is one of the notable exceptions in the LeBeau era. The defense is not designed to beat the Pats' 4 and 5 receiver offense. The personnel acquired and the scheme are not meant to defend that offense. It should be noted that no other NFL defense is designed to stop it either. The teams with the best chance to beat it are those with DB's who have the physical talent to cover 1 on 1 in man or match-up zone coverages. The teams which draft top flight corners and safeties and play man coverage regardless of who they play should have the best chance. The Ravens ran the ball and were extremely motivated and physical. Their defense is not the same 4-3 scheme as it used to be but they still have a lot of secondary talent. The coaches ran very unusual pressure schemes and this confused the Pats as it would anyone else - 4 or 5 guys on one side of the ball, who practices against that? They out-Belicheked Belichek himself. Their offense did not give the Pats anything by design (until Boller's egg-headed INT pass to no one) and pounded NE the whole game. The NFL is so cookie-cutter except for Belichek. He's the guy who first employed 2 and 1 DL defenses, did it against the Steelers no less. He is willing to change and do anything to win, no self-imposed paradigms.
I don't really like the Pats but respect that they are out-smarting the supposedly brightest minds in football. They are way outside the box, way beyond even what the Colts have done. They are totally unorthodox on offense and defense, wherever they think they can gain an advantage they attack, exploit and kill without thinking twice. If there is a chink in the armor - the knife goes right in that void. Belichek has been doing it for years and the Steelers have been one of their victims on the biggest stage many times. If you don't think coaching makes that much difference, take a look at the early 70's Steelers, the early 49ers of the 80's and the Pats first 2 SB seasons. Did they have talent - yes, did many other teams - yes, why were they dominant - coaching number one. The Tampa 2 defense of today is a direct descendent of the Steelers 4-3 man cover scheme of the 70's - the greatest defense over time in history. The Bill Walsh West Coast offense won it's first 2 SB's with average talent on the O Line and at RB ie: Earl Cooper !!. The Pats first 2-3 years of dominance had who playing on their receiving corps?? Crickey, Troy Brown played DB for Goodness Sake - anything to win, utilization of all available talent.
Talent is required, but without coaching it can not sustain itself, often not for a whole season much less for years. Talent plus good coaching = Look Out !! The zone blitz helped force the changes to the original West Coast system. The modern spread offense has checked the zone blitz defense and it's personnel in particular. Time for a change in the Steelers defensive philosophy when it comes to playing NE and others who will employ similar tactics.
by franz on Dec 11, 2007 5:38 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I'll tell you why...
The problem is our weak linebacking corps. And I mean weak in a historical sense. Lloyd, Greene, Kirkland, Gildon, Porter, and Farrior in his prime has led us to Haggans, Harrison, Foote, and an aging Farrior. There is no standout in this group. We have no legitimate pass-rushing threat besides an inconsistant Harrison.
When Woodley and Timmons come of age we'll be able to utilize the space Hampton provides by taking up two blockers. You'll also be able to use those corner blitzes that have become so rare these days.
by WarStreets on Dec 11, 2007 3:33 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
agreed
by Blitzburgh on Dec 11, 2007 4:05 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Hold on a second
As for the LBs as a group ... well, I would argue they are the best positional group of an overall very good defense. They don't measure up to some of our great LB corps but you need to be in the Hall of Fame to do that.
by steeler lifer on Dec 11, 2007 5:30 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Harrison has probably been...
Now you look at sack totals, pass coverage, qb pressure, and the LBs don't stack up to years past. Remember, I said historically speaking.
Do you see this corps. getting the kind of pressure like we had on Manning in the '05 playoffs? And that was with an aged Porter.
Don't get me wrong, they are a decent group. But it's definitely a down year for the Linebackers...historically speaking of course.
by WarStreets on Dec 11, 2007 5:41 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
point taken
I know defensive stats can be misleading. For example, our defense gets credit for ''holding'' the Patriots to, what, 22 yards rushing or something. The fact they didn't try to run is immaterial to the database. But season stats DO count for something and the LBs are an integral part of that. To this point we are No. 1 in points and yards allowed, by significant margins in both cases. We are fourth in sacks, just two behind league-leading Chicago (so much for sacks being a key indicator), and fourth in fumbles caused, again two behind league-leading Tampa Bay. We have only 8 INTs, second-worst in the league. Historically, you're absolutely right ... this is not a particularly strong group of Steelers LBs. But I think our history colors the perception of a lot of fans. In the current NFL, playing the system the Steelers play which is largely reliant on its linebacking corps to attack the line of scrimmage, the LBs have done a good job.
And yes, I'm looking forward to a LB corps that is better next year with Woodley a regular and Timmons playing a lot.
by steeler lifer on Dec 11, 2007 6:49 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Harrison aside
Harrison's another story.
by Blitzburgh on Dec 11, 2007 11:08 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Harrison
Hey -we all know that Anthony Smith deserved the undressing he got from the Patriots both verbally & physically. Hell.. I heard that Smith was still shooting his mouth off on game day - taunting Brady (yelling in his face) during the pre-game stretch. When will someone (coach Tomlin maybe?) tell this guy to STFU ???
by steelcityman on Dec 12, 2007 1:56 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
are you a Pats fan?
Brady tougher than Harrison? Hmm, not so sure about that. Who's going to have the upper edge looking tough after a TD? That's right, the guy who scored. An. Smith and Ty Carter looked pretty badass during the Bengals game, and pretty damn sheepish during the NE game.
Next time Brady bursts through the straps on a stretcher, we'll open that one back up for debate.
by Blitzburgh on Dec 12, 2007 2:04 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I'm a football fan
My point on Harrison was that he didn't confront Brady face to face, he let Brady back into him as Brady was jawing with the loudmouth... I mean Smith. My point was, I thought Brady showed more gumption on that play than Harrison. The best way, the only way to show Brady how tough you are is to stop him, to beat him, for me, anything less is BS.
I'll watch the Jag game with my brothers and we'll cheer on the Steel as usual. I hope it blizzards at Gillette and the lowly Jets beat the mighty Patriots.
by steelcityman on Dec 12, 2007 5:49 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
no man, not at all
I could tell you like the Steelers, was just curious if you had any allegiance to the Pats as well outside of being impressed by them.
You're entirely welcome, please don't let my question give you the wrong impression.
by Blitzburgh on Dec 12, 2007 5:54 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Hello!
I'll be doing some Jaguars-Centric analysis of the game, as well as injury reports and all that good stuff over at the SB Nation Jacksonville Jaguars site Big Cat Country
You all are welcome to drop by, talk smack (politely) and otherwise expand your perspective of this weeks huge game!
-Chris
by River City Rage on Dec 11, 2007 5:49 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
In my opinion..
Maybe it was the coaching or maybe it was a decent N.E. defense but the way I see it is - the Steelers scored one touchdown the whole game... and this was on a broken play... on a broken play!! You simply can not win a football game vs. this Patriots team by putting up one TD and kicking fieldgoals. Yes, there was the dumb call on the goal line where we should have had 7 but, the reality is the Steelers didn't/couldn't score!
I sure hope the coaching staff learned more about the Patriots than I did after watching this game. I learned that the Patriots offense is pretty much unstoppable and their defense isn't as bad as I thought... had hoped. I wish I could say that a rematch would/might provide a different outcome.
The Steelers must hold serve at home vs a good Jacksonville team and stay atop our division. The Steelers must keep their record better than San Diego so that Pittsburgh will draw the weaker of the wild card teams in the first round of the playoffs. Once we get through the first round, we can start to concern ourselves about how to beat the Patriots.
by steelcityman on Dec 12, 2007 1:25 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
sure but...
by Blitzburgh on Dec 12, 2007 1:41 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
True
Here's the issue -
I agree our O line played great in the run blocking schemes (not so great in the pass blocking schemes). If the Steerles don't fall behind (that's the huge if) and they stick with running the football, they will have a fighting chance against New England. If the Steelers fall behind, all bets are off.
by steelcityman on Dec 12, 2007 2:01 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Woodley, Timmons
Hopefully, both will be in the starting lineup next year. More than just those too, hopefully we will have some safeties that will play with more discipline. Against the Pats, your safeties cannot let anyone get behind them. The Steelers didn't do that, and suffered two cheap touchdowns because. I bet that the last thing Dick LeBeau told A. Smith was not to let anyone get behind him.
by datruth4life on Dec 12, 2007 4:41 PM EST reply actions 0 recs

by 














