5 Reasons Why The Steelers Will Win Saturday
By this time in the year, we know what we do well, as well as those areas in which we struggle. Same goes for the Jaguars. We know we must protect Big Ben as well as possible, even with reserves forced into the lineup. We know we need to protect against the big play in special teams, and the need to be productive on third downs and in the red zone. At the start of the year, I would have included protect the football, but Roethlisberger has done such a fine job with his decision making this year that I haven't worried about that facet of the game for quite some time now.
So, although the Jaguars present some serious matchup problems for us, here are 5 reasons I believe the Steelers will win this Saturday night:
1) Ben Roethlisberger:
Outside of Manning and Brady, I'm not sure anybody's playing QB as well as Roethlisberger, including Tony Romo and Brett Favre. 32 TDs and only 11 INTS. Are you kidding me? Behind that offensive line? Very, very impressive stuff, and the thing that makes him so exciting to watch and root for is he can almost single-handedly sustain drives for his football team. Even if the protection isn't up to snuff, Roethlisberger still has the capability to break contain and find any of his three primary targets (Heath, Hines, Santonio). If you harken back to the first Jacksonville game, you'll remember that the protection was actually not that bad despite the 5 sacks allowed. All 5 were a result of Marvel Smith playing the worst game of his career due to a bad back. If Essex and Colon can play even B- football, and Simmons, Mahan and Faneca play well, I have faith Roethlisberger will be able to get the job done.
2) Experience Counts:
Experience isn't everything - simply having done or not done something before doesn't guarantee a thing, but the reality is our roster is far more playoff tested than is Jacknsonville's. This isn't the first rodeo for guys like Roeth, Faneca, Hines, Heath, Foote, Hampton, etc. Sure there are guys on the Jaguars who have been to the playoffs before, but none have won 3 consecutive games on the road like our players have. Let's see how David Garrard does if we are able to score first and get the rowdy folks at Heinz Field involved. Holding onto a lead with a subdued crowd is one thing. Making plays when you have to in a playoff environment is another. Many of our leaders have done so. Most of Jacksonville's has not.
3) Home Field Advantage:
As was proved during our 2005 run, home field advantage only means so much. However, as was pointed out by a commentor in a previous thread, no team has beaten Pittsburgh twice at home in the same year since ___? Not sure, but either forever, or at least in a really long time. For as inconsistent as we've been the second half of the season, most of our problems have come on the road. We haven't played brilliantly each contest at Heinz, but we nevertheless finished the season 7-1 at home. As the #4 seed, we'd only get a 2nd home game in the AFC Championship game, and that would take a TN win over both SD and NE. In other words, not going to happen. This is our last chance to play in front of the home-town faithful most likely. Let's take advantage in what will likely be Alan Faneca's last home game as a Steeler.
4) The Weather:
Perhaps a stretch here, but I think the conditions should be more in our favor than they were last time around. Last time we played it was windy, wet and cold at Heinz - perfect conditions for Jacksonville to run it down our throats while limiting the effectiveness of our passing game. This time, the forecast for tomorrow night appears relatively calm. Winds should be minimal, snow is definitely not in the forecast, and there's only a decent chance for rain early Saturday evening during the contest. We're doomed if it's a sloppy slugfest that Roethlisberger struggles to find a rhythm in. Doesn't look like that will be the case.
5) It's Jacknsoville in a big game:
Each year is a new year, but let's face it, this Jacksonville team has struggled in recent memory to win big games near the end of the season or in the playoffs. They've only reached the postseason once in the past 7 years (2005 lost to NE in WC Round), but they've had opportunities to snag a spot in other years and have failed. In 2004 and 2006, Jacksonville came up short despite being positioned to grab a playoff berth in both seasons. Kudos to the GM of Jacknsonville for architecting a team capable of long-term consistency, but I still am not sold on their ability to win big games when it truly counts. Much of that futility came during the Byron Leftwich era though. Garrard has a chance to turn the page on that chapter of Jags' history with a big game this Saturday night.
0 recs |
15 comments
Comments
Re: Home Field
If the latter, given that the stadium's only a few years old, it's not THAT meaningful of a statistic.
Maybe this is just anecdotal, but when Heath Miller becomes a regular target for Ben, we win games. I don't know why he's been so neglected the last few weeks when, halfway through the season, he had 400 yards and 6 or 7 TDs. Get him into the game. That's it.
by HinesField on Jan 4, 2008 4:10 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Miller
by cgolden on Jan 4, 2008 4:17 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
two backs
by Michael Bean (Blitz) on Jan 4, 2008 5:01 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
good question
by cgolden on Jan 4, 2008 5:38 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Pretty sure the stat is
by Cotter on Jan 4, 2008 7:28 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Amen!
Ben is definitely the #1 commandment. He really gives us a chance to win every game we play. We all watch the Steelers. We remember the first meeting. We know we got totally blown out on both sides of the line and that's why we're nervous and the pundits are picking Jax. Yet, we were able to forge a late tie before the D buckled in the final minutes. Ben's ability to get away and make a play is unmatched since Elway. Other than Manning or Brady I wouldn't take another QB in the league and with this O line I might not even take Manning! Ben needs to throw early and often and get Hines, Heath and Holmes involved. Then like 05 they can pound them with Dookie and Frenchy (#33 the old schoolers get it)
I don't know what stat is being talked about in this post. I think the stat is that no one has beaten the Steelers twice at Heinz in one year. I can't believe that since 1933 no one beat them twice at home in one year. They have had some sad sack squads. On the flip side of that coin since they would have never made the playoffs maybe they never played many teams twice let alone at home. Either way only tomorrow counts.
by 5020 on Jan 4, 2008 8:35 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Ben
by steelerinchicago on Jan 4, 2008 9:00 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
In 74 years
by RickVa on Jan 4, 2008 9:22 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Faneca, Starks contract news
Steelers seek to sign Faneca, Starks
By Jim Wexell, For the Herald-Standard
01/05/2008
Updated 01/05/2008 01:15:30 AM EST
PITTSBURGH - The Steelers don't expect the season to end for another month, but the front office is prepared to plow ahead with an off-season plan that involves competitive contract offers to both Alan Faneca and Max Starks.
"We're going to take a run at both of them," said a high-level source with the team.
When asked to assess the possibility the Steelers can sign either player, the source said: "Fifty-fifty on each."
The Steelers have found themselves in dire straits along the offensive line with the recent back problems being endured by left tackle Marvel Smith.
Smith was replaced ably by Starks, who came off the bench the last month of the season and showed how well he can play when his weight's under control. But Starks injured the meniscus cartilage in his left knee and was put on injured reserve this week.
The Steelers don't expect the recent surgery to impede the progress Starks has made, thus the renewed interest in the 6-8 tackle.
As for Faneca and his perception of his Steelers career, he said only two days ago: "I go with the assumption it's over."
He might be right, considering the Steelers normally wouldn't pay a 31-year-old guard the exorbitant salary it'll take to keep him. But Faneca, who made his 96th consecutive regular-season start last week and his seventh consecutive Pro Bowl three weeks ago, hasn't shown any signs of slowing down.
And then there was this comment from Larry Zierlein earlier this week:
"I wouldn't be surprised to see Alan finish his career as a center because he's just so smart," said the Steelers' offensive line coach.
After a season of inconsistent play at that position, the Steelers would no doubt like to do with Faneca what they should've done to keep Rod Woodson: Offer the big contract with the caveat of the player moving to another position as he slows down.
Woodson did, in fact, finish his career as a free safety. He left the Steelers following the 1996 season and didn't retire until the end of the 2003 season.
Faneca was asked about the prospect of finishing his career as the Steelers' next great center.
"I'd be open to listening," he said. "I'm not saying I would do that or be against it. I'd definitely be open-minded and talk about it with whomever."
The Steelers also believe Faneca might give them a slight break, or "hometown discount," because of his wife Julie's affinity for Pittsburgh.
"We made lots of great friends here," Faneca admitted. "No one ever said it would be easy."
But it doesn't have to be so difficult.
The front office watched quarterback Ben Roethlisberger absorb 47 sacks this season and realizes that losing two of the team's best linemen is not the proper direction to take. And with a reported $18.6 million available under the projected 2008 salary cap, the Steelers have the means to take whatever direction they wish.
NOTES: The Jacksonville Jaguars might be one of the hottest teams in the league, but their fans aren't too interested. The Jaguars returned less than 1,000 unwanted tickets and the Steelers posted a link on their website Friday to sell them. The link was taken down less than 15 minutes later. ... SS Troy Polamalu (knee) and RS Allen Rossum (hamstring) practiced Friday and both expect to play Saturday. Coach Mike Tomlin said that Santonio Holmes is no longer a candidate to return punts.
by datruth4life on Jan 5, 2008 3:48 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
faneca
If the comment reflects serious intent, I would say it's likely the Steelers are committed to signing one of them (as per the 50-50 odds comment). Then it becomes a question of how much they are willing to overspend in each case. They have some cap room, but is it better for them to spend (to pick a number) $2 million more per year than they would like to get Faneca, or $1 million more per year than they would like to sign Starks. They might be able to keep Faneca by matching the highest offer (the so-called hometown discount), but in Starks' case I'm sure they would have to offer more money than anyone else. Starks can't be very happy with his season-long demotion to backup. For a new team, with a new contract, he would be automatically pencilled in as the starter at RT and be given plenty of opportunities to prove he was worth the money.
I had never thought about the possibility of moving Faneca to center, because I had always thought he was done with the Steelers after this season. Maybe watching Mahan all year has resulted in the coaches and management reviewing their options and re-evaluating how valuable Faneca could still be. I don't agree with Wexell's comment that Faneca ''hasn't shown any signs of slowing down.'' Literally, that might be true. He might be just as quick as ever and he is still the team's best OL. But his play has not been up to his own standard and I don't see him playing another 4-5 years at guard at a level commensurate with the price it would take to keep him.
But Faneca as a center, in a scenario where Smith returns, gives the Steelers a chance to remix their personnel and come up with a better group than they had this year. At the very least Faneca would provide high-level stability at centre and allow the team to rebuild the OL over the next 2-3 years. The OL is a jigsaw puzzle with no guarantee that the picture next year will be any better than this year.
For example, The addition of a first-round OT could create an OL that has Smith at LT, Colon or Simmons at LG, Faneca at C, Colon, Mahan or Kemoeatu at RG, and the drafted OT or Colon at RT. That group would have the versatility to play different positions depending on injuries, or give the rookie OT a bit of time before starting. There would certainly be another rookie from the draft in the picture as well.
The alternative might not be much worse. If Faneca leaves and Starks stays, then you go into the draft with Smith and either Starks or Colon at OT, and Simmons, Mahan and possibly Colon at the top of the depth chart for the three interior positions. The Steelers would probably have enough cap room to sign a veteran free agent OL to compete at any of the three interior positions, and there will be a couple new OL from the draft.
The worst-case scenario is Faneca and Starks leaving and Smith not recovering from his back injury. The Steelers would have to spend significant money on a veteran free agent OL, and probably start a drafted rookie OT. It's hard to imagine that group (a rookie or veteran free agent at LT, Simmons or veteran free agent at LG, Mahan or veteran free agent at C, Mahan or Kemoeatu at RG and Colon at RT) being an improvement on this year.
There is no way of knowing at this point how the OL will look next year. But I think we can be sure the first change will be a new OL coach (perhaps within 3-4 weeks) and, within two years, a minimum of 3 and probably 4 new starters.
by steeler lifer on Jan 5, 2008 1:45 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I'll believe it when I see it
- Unless Faneca takes a huge discount, I would count on it (I really wouldn't even want him at the current market price).
- Starks looked good in his time on the field, but I was hoping he'd get at least one game that he be tested by a speed rusher. The Mud Bowl and Cincy game played to his strengths b/c it neutralized speed.
by cgolden on Jan 5, 2008 2:47 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
good news i guess
by schnifin on Jan 5, 2008 4:10 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
Del Rio
For me, Del Rio is not a big game coach and that Jags are, therefore, not a big game team. The problem is adjustments, which is just not a concept that the Jags deploy. If the Steelers get a lead in this game of 10 or greater points, I believe that the Jags will begin to struggle and will turn the ball over. This is the crux of my hope.
Go Steelers!
by rushthequarterback on Jan 5, 2008 12:32 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Hey...
Check it out and let me know what I missed about the Steelers.
Blitz, you know that I know almost nothing about the Steelers... so come set me straight.
And full disclosure, I did pick the Jags to win. Don't hate.
by TexSkins on Jan 5, 2008 1:16 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
I think Ben is second best...
Last year he throws a game-ending interception softly into a San Diego Charger and he drops it. Next game he couldn't manage a 21-3 lead against the Colts. It just seems like he's been blessed beyond his laurels. I know, this year is awfully special for him and hard to argue, but if we traded our offensive line for the Patriots line, would Ben be better than Brady?
Sorry for venting. I like my guy and I hope some linebacker puts a Bart Scott on Brady, and then 46 times more in a single season. Then we'll see how good he is.
Tim
I know I'm going against the grain here
by maryrose on Jan 5, 2008 2:15 PM EST reply actions 0 recs


















