Behind the Steel Curtain: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:



Around SBN: Monday Night Heartache, Take Two: Bills fall to Browns Bar-right-arrows



spread the word

Jim Wexell Answers Some BTSC Bye Week Steelers Questions

I hope you all enjoyed your one  weekend this fall without Steelers action. Pardon my absence this morning while I tended to other matters. Let's get things back into gear with a Q&A with my favorite Steelers reporter Jim Wexell. Don't forget that Wexell has a new book out, which I myself have begun reading. A full review is coming soon enough, but believe me, it's worth evey last red cent.

1) What the hell is going on with Max Starks? Is your guess as good as ours or is there something you may know about why he can't even beat out Trai Essex for a reserve role?

I reported last February of a difference of opinion between the front office and coaching staff on Starks, but I was still caught off guard by their decision to play Essex over Starks when Marvel Smith got hurt against Jacksonville. But I'm buying Mike Tomlin's explanation that Essex was going up against a smaller, speedier rusher in Quentin Groves. I think that matchup made more sense than using Starks over there at left tackle.

I realize most people are calling the transition tag one of the great mistakes in Steelers personnel history. While I agree it was a mistake, I do feel that Starks could pay off in a big way this season. If they're in a big game, and they need a pro tackle to step in, I'm not sure anyone will be thinking about the price tag -- unless Starks bombs when called upon, but I don't think he will.



2) You know how fans can be: when a problem arises, seek out the offensive coordinator and immediately begin pointing fingers. What's your take on how Arians has done since the Philadelphia game?

Wexell:  Well, you knew Baltimore would be difficult, and the Steelers prevailed.  But I thought Arians' best moment came last week against Jacksonville. He spread the offense on early downs, threw the short, quick passes that he normally abhors, threw to the backs, the tight ends. In general, Arians called the game for which the fans and media have been asking. Still, Jacksonville doesn't have much of a pass rush. Let's see if Arians builds off that game and the Steelers can effectively move the ball against a real, live pass-rushing team.

3) Do you think we'll keep 5 RBs moving forward now that we know what we have in Mewelde Moore. Seems like at least one of the trio of Najeh Davenport, Gary Russell or Carey Davis is expendable. We have tended to keep 5 RBs though when health is not an issue.

Wexell:
It's always a numbers game. I see them keeping five until a minor injury occurs at another position, say undrafted rookie linebacker/special teamer, and you have to keep both Donovan Woods and Patrick Bailey on the roster. Then I could see Najeh Davenport getting cut, since Gary Russell flashed in a real game what he'd been showing in preseason games and practice. I also believe Dallas Baker can be stashed on the practice squad if necessary.

4) How impressed are you watching LaMarr Woodley? Can you tell us something about his game that we may not pick up watching from home that's helping him just explode onto the scene in year #2.

Wexell:
I don't think I'm any different than any of the reporters who watched him dominate line drills early in camp, or fans who watched him all preseason. I think everyone knew he was a stud-in-the-making. What's surprising me is his agility in open space. He's given them coverage skills and sound open-field tackling. I know we were all surprised by that even in the 2007 Hall of Fame Game, but he's built upon it and is becoming a Kevin Greene who can cover.

5) This is probably an unfair quesiton but do you think we'll re-up Bryant McFadden this offseason? Feel free to pass if you think there's no way to tell, but the way we see it, it's a sound investment considering how well he's played, not to mention all the other high priority needs in the next couple of drafts.

Wexell:

It's going to be difficult. He told me a week or so before the season began that "it's in God's hands." That's exactly what Antwaan Randle El told me before the 2005 season, and he of course won a ring and some votes for Super Bowl MVP. Apparently, that kind of glory isn't what Randle El meant by "God's hands." Apparently, "God's hands" had more to do with boatloads of money. I expect the same from McFadden, who's become the Steelers' best cornerback. But, you know, that's the big difference: McFadden is the Steelers' best corner, not their best slot receiver/return man, so perhaps the Steelers will get serious with McFadden in a way they didn't with Randle El, who was also a second-round pick.


6) When's the last time you saw a Steelers defense that was playing this well? Sure there have been a few down moments on a series here or there, but overall, this unit is dominating, and from where I sit, they're good enough to keep us in the thick of just about every game, as well as the playoff picture in the AFC. Or maybe I'm just overestimating their play when compared to the up-and-down play of the offense.

Wexell:
No, Michael, I don't think you're overestimating them. This is the best defense I've seen here since the mid 1990s and Blitzburgh. I think the recent display of DL depth showed so much. It reinforced that they have depth at all defensive positions. It's also a different game than it was in the mid 1990s, when LeBeau had the boys feasting on dropback quarterbacks unaccustomed to seeing such pressure. Now, that kind of pressure is so prevelant that young QBs are better prepared going into a game against a team like the Steelers. So now it's up to raw talent and even further innovation, which the Steelers have on both counts. I don't think we've seen even a tip of what LeBeau can do with a Lawrence Timmons and a healthy and bigger Troy Polamalu on the field at the same time.

7) To conclude, can you comment on what you've seen out of Darnell Stapleton? It was our fantasy somewhat that just one or two changes along the line personnel wise might totally change things for the better, even if the individuals being subbed in were nothing to necessarily write home about. As a follow up, any thoughts on Justin Hartwig's play since the Philly game and how he may or may not be comfortable now that he's beside Stapleton?

Wexell: I can't say that I've watched Hartwig closely, but I think it's clear that he's been an upgrade at center. Could the Steelers do better? Yes, and it's the media's assumption that Stapleton will be that center of the future. He's a bit small to be playing guard, but he held his own against Jacksonville. If that was Marcus Stroud he was going against, I think we could all be ecstatic. But Stapleton did hold his own. He scratches and claws and gets the job done. I just worry about him against the bigger and stronger tackles that beat Kendall Simmons up over the years. We shall see.

5 recs | Comment 12 comments | Digg!

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

Nice

Another great interview Blitz. You hit all the main questions we just keep going round and round about on the board. I have to say after reading this, I still would like to see Arians gone after this season. No matter what our record is. An offensive cord that normally abhors short/quick passes with our o-line woes??

by SteelBuckeye on Oct 13, 2008 6:22 PM EDT   0 recs

Another home run

Wexell is good enough to take on the tough ones. Excellent questions.

by maryrose on Oct 13, 2008 6:38 PM EDT   0 recs

Nice interview

1. Despite the 4-1 record and the offensive success against Jax, I still would like to see Arians replaced after this season. I have seen too much evidence in his 1+ seasons to change my mind after one game. Like Wexall said, I’d like to see how he calls a game against a team with a better pass rush. (And don’t think that Pit moved the ball well against Baltimore. They clearly didn’t in the first half, and then only put together some offense in the 2nd half when Ben hit two splash plays to Holmes and Ward. That and the defensive td was enough to eek out the win.)

2. I am still very confused at times with personnel decisions that the team makes.

- For example, why did Mewelde Moore only get a significant chance to play once Carey Davis got hurt in the Balt game? Do they really think that Davis is a better rb than Moore? Hopefully Moore doesn’t disappear now that FWP and Davis are healthy. A case could easily be made that if Davis hadn’t gotten hurt and kept Moore on the sidelines, that Pit would have lost the previous two games.

- Stapleton has only played 1.5 games but he has acquitted himself well. He seems to play with good leverage and he also seams to be very aware. I will not be surprised if he proves to be an upgrade over Simmons this year. That of course begs the question, “Why was Simmons starting over Stapleton to begin with?”

- This has been beaten to death, but is Colon really a better right OT than Starks?

3. The issue with giving Starks 7 million dollars is cap (mis)management. I understand the premise of depth but spending 7 million dollars on a backup tackle (possibly the 4th best OT, or at least the #3b OT, if you consider that Essex was put in before Starks against Jax) is just not a sound decision. The Steelers are up against the cap nearly every year and it limits their options. Many want Mcfadden resigned. Is it possible that part of that 7 million could have gone to Mcfadden and helped the Steelers extend him before this season? Combine Starks’ contract with the contract given to Simmons…..

4. If possible I would like to see the following questoin posed to Wexall in a future interview if possible:

- How has the Steelers philosophy towards putting a roster together, especially with regards to the draft, changed since Tomlin has become head coach? Or has it?

I ask because it seems to me that under Cowher, the Steelers usually drafted with a need based philosophy, especially with their early picks. The only recent first round pick under Cowher that wasn’t need oriented was the Ben Roethlisberger pick. And even then, rumor has it that Cowher wanted to pick Shawn Andrews instead, only to be overruled.

However, that doesn’t appear to be the case under Tomlin. In 2007, it could be argued that lb wasn’t the area of greatest need. And even if you disagree with that premise, few would have thought that the Steelers would draft lb with their first TWO picks (Timmons and Woodley) that year. At the time, many including myself thought that this was done with an eventual move to a 4-3 defense in mind. But that has not turned out to be the case. And as a follow up to 2007, I think most would acknowledge that rb (Mendenhall) and wr (Sweed) were again not the two biggest positions of need this year. And of course, we drafted another lb (Davis) in the 3rd round this year after taking Timmons and Woodley last year.

Now I must admit that I am a believer in leaning towards drafting BPA (especially if a clear BPA presents himself at the time of your pick), so this would please me if it’s actually the case.

5. Speaking of the draft, it appears that the 2007 draft has provided a bounty of fruit. Timmons, Woodley, and Sepulveda should be solid fixtures for quite some time. Spaeth and Gay could be solid role players. (I readily admit that I am not as informed about Spaeth as I should be. But while I thought he was a weak blocker last year, he has not caught my eye as much this year with regards to lack of blocking ability. If he is still a mediocre blocker and has not improved since last season, please correct me.) Of course Stapleton could also be another harvested fruit as well. You can never complain with getting 6 players from a draft, especially when one is already a true difference maker (Woodley) and another (Timmons) could be headed in that direction.

I look forward to hopefully seeing the 2008 draftees contribute next season. Of course, Mendenhall is hurt and the other draftees aren’t contributing this year, but then again, Woodley and Timmons weren’t exactly contributing last year either.

Sorry for the long post.

by steeler1275 on Oct 14, 2008 3:36 AM EDT   0 recs

lots of good thoughts in there

No need for apologies :)

I’ll see if others want to jump in about your comments and questions before doing so myself.

by Blitzburgh on Oct 14, 2008 4:35 AM EDT to parent up   0 recs

At Blitz's suggestion

1. Completely agree. Even if we get a deep playoff run going, I’m pretty sure it will be because Ben is running the no-huddle constantly. I know Ben STILL likes Arians, which is probably why he still has a job, but we need to get a guy in there who can complement Ben’s abilities, not waste them.

2. The Steelers are very conservative with starting young players. I’ll agree that starting rookies doesn’t need to happen most of the time, but guys like Timmons and McFadden should be starting by year 2 or at least 3. You also have to wonder why it took Kemo so long to get in the lineup.

3. They weren’t going to sign McFadden, Kemo, or Marvel before the season because they didn’t know how’d they’d play. McFadden is the only one who has blown us out of the water so far, so I think he’ll be a priority.

4. Mmmm, the draft. I agree that they are going more towards drafting BPA, although I’m not sure if that’s Tomlin or Colbert. I did feel like we drafted for need in 2007, at least with Timmons. We had just let go of Porter, and not very many people thought Harrison would be as good as he’s been. Also, Haggans was in his last year and we were thin and old at ILB. We could have used an OL (I liked Joe Staley), but LB was a very big need.

In any case, we’ll probably be forced to draft an OL early in 2009, unless we sign Kemo and Marvel, and if not OL, then McFadden’s replacement, or a DL. Drafting the best player available is great, but there are some positions we’re well stocked at. In 2009, there’d be no reason to draft a RB, TE, WR, or QB with our first pick. That also seems a bit high for a FS given Polamalu’s abilities, and any OLB, ILB, or CB (depending on BMac) probably won’t see the field for 2-3 years. Unless we feel there is a can’t miss prospect at WR, LB, FS, or CB, I think we’ll stick to the trenches. We need to find the next Aaron Smith, and we need to find the next… half decent offensive lineman. Since our team is so deep and we will have a couple comp picks, we should feel comfortable identifying the players we want and trading up to get them.

charity standing orders

by BadMaafala on Oct 14, 2008 12:26 PM EDT to parent up   0 recs

Great stuff Blitz and Wexell
he’s built upon it and is becoming a Kevin Greene who can cover.

Does everyone realize how powerful of a statement that is?

by cgolden on Oct 14, 2008 9:57 AM EDT   0 recs

Five is not enough

had a good interview with Wexell recently that covered some of the same questions. It’s pretty long, but there’s some good stuff in it.

charity standing orders

by BadMaafala on Oct 14, 2008 12:34 PM EDT   0 recs

Good interview

Thanks for the link.

by SteelBuckeye on Oct 14, 2008 6:29 PM EDT to parent up   0 recs

Great interview

and some great comments as well. I just had a couple of thoughts to throw out there as well.

First, on McFadden, I think the way he’s played this year would definitely make him a higher priority to sign than Randle El was after ‘05. El was very versatile and useful for our team, but who else thought he was worth top WR money? After this year, it looks like McFadden will be worth top CB money, so we should give it to him. Starks’ money coming off the cap should help with that.

Second, on this year’s draft, I agree with Bad. The Steelers really need to target some key guys on lines and trade up or down based how the draft comes to us. With some of our extra compensatory picks, we should be in a better position to make some moves in this draft as opposed to last year, when we only had 6 picks. I do think that we did a great job this offseason targeting guys late in the draft, and free agency, to improve out STs coverage.

by WolfpackSteelersFan on Oct 14, 2008 2:25 PM EDT   0 recs

Regarding drafting BPA vs need

As a follow up to my previous post and some comments that have followed:

1. I don’t mean to imply that need shouldn’t be addressed or that Tomlin hasn’t addressed need at all with his two drafts.

- I agree that lb was a need heading into the 2007 draft, but he has since drafted Timmons (1), Woodley (2), Davis (3), and Humpal (5). That’s a lot of lb, not that I mind.

- I agree that the trenches need to be addressed. But I have read that this year’s draft is deep in that regard, especially with regards to the off line. If the FO realized that the 2009 draft would be flush with off linemen last year and decided to wait another year instead of just selecting the 9th best offensive lineman in last year’s first round, then I believe that to be very prudent. And while it may seem common sense not to reach for a player at a position of need, this is the same organization that selected Troy Edwards in the first round in 1999 at pick 13.

- I also think sometimes focus too much on addressing a need with a premium pick. But later round picks are also very important. A championship team is going to have to have some later round draft picks pan out. For example, Aaron Smith was a 4th round pick and Keisel was a 7th rounder. Stapleton is an UDFA. One reason that our trenches need an injection of talent is because previous picks like Orien Harris, Ryan Mcbean, Trai Essex, Bo Lacy, Shaun Nua, Marvin Phillip, etc, haven’t panned out. The Steelers are simply going to have to do a better job in the later rounds. If the team does spend high picks in the trenches next draft, they will still have to find gems at other positions later in the draft, or those positions will quickly become areas of need.

by steeler1275 on Oct 14, 2008 5:41 PM EDT   0 recs

Draft

Can someone tell me why we’re talking about the Draft after week 6 of the season, Talk about winning the Division, our upcoming gauntlet of a schedule but its too early to start thinkin Draft. I love the Draft as much as the next guy but come on guys, we’re 4-1 leading our division and still have some great games left. Let’s enjoy this season then we can talk draft!!!!!

by colorado steelhead on Oct 14, 2008 5:50 PM EDT   0 recs

hehheh

well we are coming of a bye week, and we can only complain about Arians so much? I know what you are saying focus on this season, but part of the fun of being a Steeler fan is worrying about the future. We are really luck to have a team that is in the mix year in and year out (with out our input :) Our starting LT, LG, LCB, and both back up tackles are free agents this year, is it ever to early to think of the furture? Maybe but it is fun.

by SteelBuckeye on Oct 14, 2008 7:09 PM EDT to parent up   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to BTSC, a blog dedicated to the five-time world champion Steelers.

"Thoughtful discussion with a sense of history."

Art Rooney Jr.

"Level-headed thinking." Pittsburgh Post-Gazette

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
Imagine For A Second Steelers Fans If....
Small
The Steelers, Big Ben, And A New Sense of Place
Small
My contribution
Stampedeblue_small
Ask BigBlueShoe: Week Ten

Recent FanPosts

Small
Tomlin over Cowher??
Small
Tight Ends
Small
Vote Harrison and Parker!!!
Small
AFC NORTH HEAD COACHES- What a joke!
10717039-full_small
2 STEELERS NOMINATED FOR WEEK 11 NFL HONORS
Solar_eclipse_1__small
That didn't take long Ricardo!
Steelers_ii_small
Mike Pereira said
Girl-tv1_small
AFC Playoff picture
Awesome_small
My Two Cents…

Post_icon New FanPost All FanPosts Carrot-mini


Site Editors

Solar_eclipse_1__small Blitzburgh

Steeler_small maryrose

Editors

G_small cgolden

ad

Site Meter