Steelers Might Want To Test New York Giants CB Aaron Ross
Maybe he's been distracted by all the success his college team Texas is having this past two weeks, but New York Giants CB Aaron Ross sure has been lit up recently. The 2nd year DB, whose improved play down the stretch played a big role in the Giants' improbable SB run, may just be going through one of those hard to explain tough stretches, but he also might have a legitimate weakness that opposing offenses are actively seeking to exploit. I wouldn't know really, I do not enjoy watching this team play at all. But let's still take a look at some of his recent struggles.
Two weeks ago at Cleveland, Ross frequently found himself lined up across from Braylon Edwards. On the evening, Edwards fininshed with 5 huge catches, and 2 TDs for 154 yards. Included in his exploits was a 70 yard bomb on Aaron Ross, and his 2nd TD, from 11 yards out, also was against Ross, who ultimately would not return after being injured on the scoring play. When you consider just how bad the Cleveland aerial attack has been all year, Ross' play has to be worrisome for Giants fans.
This past Sunday against the 49ers, Ross again was picked on. And believe me, it's tough to be picked on by a JT O'Sullivan led San Francisco offense. Things certainly were not as bad as they were the week before, but Giants secondary still surrendered 256 yards through the air on just 16 completions, and Ross was I believe the culprit on the 49ers lone offensive TD, a 30 yard pass and catch to Josh Morgan.
It hasn't been all fun and games for the former UT standout Aaron Ross lately.
Here's the one potential trap though. If we look at film and see how Ross has struggled, I'm worried we resort back to our earlier inclination to try to stretch the field too early and often. There will be a few plays to be had throughout the game, but we've got to focus on slowing down the Giants pass rush before any play-action or vertical passing can be expected to work, at least consistently. This game, which we'll be previewing throughout the week, has all sorts of nice and juicy sub-plots. The Eli vs. Ben debate, our beleaguered but improving O-Line vs the Giants depleted but still lethal pass rush, as well as our need to stay within the framework of what's been working the past two weeks in the face of what I feel will be a strong temptation to try to excessively attack New York's young secondary. And oh yeah, these two teams have as much, if not more, history than any other franchises in the history of professional football. Should be fun.
9 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Good points
I’ve said it elsewehere, but the same game plan we used against the Bengals should be effective against the Giants: quick slants, dumpoffs, TE involvement, and roll outs early, set up the running game a little, and THEN target a guy like Ross deep when he starts jumping the short routes. No one on their entire team can cover our players for more than 3 seconds, so unless they get to the QB, they’re toast. As long as we don’t pull out our Eagles game plan, I think we’ll have some success.
charity standing orders
Bad
That, basically, is the game plan everyone has tried to use against the Giants. Anything to avoid giving the Giants pass rush time to make an impact.
by Ed Valentine on Oct 21, 2008 12:45 PM EDT up reply actions
Nice Take
and I agree there are plays to be made but they need to be set up as discussed.
I like the O Line this week against the Giants. NY doesn’t do a lot of fancy stuff up front – all but 2 or 3 of their 21 sacks come from lineman. The most damaging pass rushes against the Steelers have involved overloads, blitzing LBs and twisting lineman. Stuff the Giants don’t do a lot of .
I like the Cincy game plan as well. A lot of 2TE quick hit stuff. Establish the LOS and get Ben in a rhythm with his receivers and protection.
groupthink sux
by mental.apparition on Oct 21, 2008 10:17 AM EDT reply actions
Good stuff as usual
I have been looking forward to this game all season. I like our chances against this team, especially with the Oline improving the way it has been lately.
Ross
You guys are right that Ross has been burned the past two weeks. The strange thing is he is the Giants best cover corner and I think it is entirely possible that very soon people will be calling him one of the best in the league. The 49er TD he gave up was a great throw by JT O’Sullivan where Ross had good coverage. He did get abused by Braylon Edwards in the Cleveland game, though.
agreed
I think Ross is going to be just fine. I tried to mention in my post that it could just be a fluke, not really a knock on his potential, that hes struggled a bit lately. I saw lots of him at Texas growing up there. Kid can play and he made huge strides over his career there. I don’t imagine he’s done developing at the pro level.
Ed, whats his playing weight/size now. He bulked up a bit? A step slower perhaps if so?
by Michael Bean on Oct 21, 2008 12:50 PM EDT up reply actions
Ross
Listed at 6-0, 197. Big, but not that big. He has tremendous closing speed. He has been beaten a couple of times recently, but also has made plays running down guys from behind that normal human beings have no business making. Sunday he got beat, and Monday night he fell down. What are you gonna do? The life of a cornerback.
by Ed Valentine on Oct 21, 2008 3:01 PM EDT up reply actions
exactly
cornerbacks can be great on 58 of 60 plays in a game (similar to an OT), and if they slip on one and get beat on another, they got “abused.” that being said, he did get beat up by Braylon Edwards on more than just the TD where he slipped, gave up a bunch of inside routes as well.
by TheMostViolentTeam on Oct 22, 2008 1:47 AM EDT up reply actions
Inside routes
All the Giants corners have been vulnerable to that quick inside slant. They blitz a lot and play man-to-man press coverage. If you can beat the press and get a quick step to the inside (easier said than done, of course) you can get that quick completion off the three-step drop.
by Ed Valentine on Oct 22, 2008 9:30 AM EDT up reply actions

by 


















