Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Fighters React to Nick Diaz's Positive Drug Test

I'm curious...

I'd like to know what everyone else thinks about this.  I haven't heard much talk about it yet, but this play really bothered me.

I was very upset after we went for iton 4th and 5 in the 4th quarter.  The score was 14-9 and there was, if I remember correctly, about 12 minutes left in the game.  Why?  Why go for it there?  Aside from that first drive, the offense had been struggling all game to get into some sort of a rhythm.  We were up by five and if you kick there, we are up by eight, a two score or two point conversion lead.  We have a kicker who is at 100% on the year.  We were at the 30.  Why?  Let him kick a 47 yarder.  Why trust an offense that had been struggling the majority of the game instead of a sure thing, or at least as close to one as we have on our team.  That play changed the entire complexion of the second half.  Ben threw a pick, and the momentum completely shifted in their favor.   Its not like we were burning up the field on offense.  After that play, we did not have one single 1st down for the rest of the game.  As I said in an earlier post, this was the first decision that Tomlin made that just flat out infuriated me.  I am a huge fan of his, so I'm not jumpin off his wagon, just hated the call.  Any comments?

 

By the way, here is my report on my adoptee, Nate Washington.  Nate had 1 catch for 65 yds that went for a TD.  Great catch and throw.  He also had another beautiful catch that was called back on a very frustrating Colon hold.  On the negative side, Nate had three drops, one of which he tipped into the hands of Giant Bryan Kehl.  In his defense, he was hit hard on the catch.  However, Ben hit  him square in the chest, and guys get hit over the middle in this league and hold on to the ball every sunday in this league.  He should have caught it.

Comment 19 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Injured

long snapper definitely changed the complexion of the game. Tomlin felt better about a 4th and 5 with the O on the field than 92 snapping.

My question is why didn’t Hartwig snap? He does for the shotgun! Wouldn’t he have been a better choice than Debo?

When You Run The Ball Good Things Happen

by 5020 on Oct 27, 2008 12:25 PM EDT reply actions  

hmm

I didn’t even think about Warren.

by steelerark on Oct 27, 2008 12:34 PM EDT reply actions  

Ha, I didn’t even think about the holder. Not sure you want a guy with a busted hammy placing the ball for Reed.

by steelguy99 on Oct 27, 2008 1:22 PM EDT up reply actions  

Warren out yet?

Cant remember for sure but I thought the injury to Warren came after this situation. I remember scratching my head on this one as well. Pts in this game were critical and even 3 points may have been a psychological advantage for us.

by BlkNGold on Oct 27, 2008 1:16 PM EDT reply actions  

From Tomlin’s post game:

Can you talk about the injury to Greg Warren?
Greg Warren tore his ACL, so he was out. Nobody has two long snappers on their team; what you have is emergency snappers. James Harrison is regarded as the lead candidate in that regard; James Farrior is after him. We got some snaps on the sideline and we felt comfortable. We reduced the depth of our punter to 13 yards so that accuracy would be less of an issue. We weren’t able to execute but make no mistake, I take my hat off to James Harrison for stepping up and volunteering and being pumped about snapping that football. We just weren’t able to get it done. That was the first game that I have been involved in that we didn’t have a snapper; so be it.
 
Is that why you didn’t kick the field goal in the fourth quarter?
Absolutely. That was on the outer limits of field goal range. When you have a backup snapper in there you knew that they were going to come after it. I just didn’t feel comfortable kicking with whoever we put out there in that position. It was a manageable fourth down if you will; we took a shot with our offense.
 
Why don’t we see regular centers long snap in that situation?
There is a big difference between a shotgun snap and a long snap.

charity standing orders

by BadMaafala on Oct 27, 2008 1:30 PM EDT reply actions  

I hope Deebo simmers for the next 8 days and takes it out on the redskins.

by steelguy99 on Oct 27, 2008 1:34 PM EDT up reply actions  

nah

They really aren’t. Look at where Hartwig snaps it to. He snaps it to 6’5" Ben’s upper chest in a slow arc 3 yards deep. If it took that long on a kick, it will be blocked more than 50% of the time. (yeah I made up that stat, who cares! Honestly, who knows how often, but if you look at how close it comes with a good sharp snap it’s hard to say you wouldn’t see a block most often)

by Chicago Steeler on Oct 27, 2008 4:26 PM EDT up reply actions  

Another possibility

Is that we were on the 34, not the 30. Sorry to nitpick, but that makes it a 51-yarder instead of a 47-yarder. While Skippy has proven capable, I was OK with going for it. An incomplete pass is better than a missed FG (by seven yards). I am one of those guys who doesn’t mind the occasional fourth-down gamble, especially on the opponents side of the field. The longsnapper notwithstanding, I am still OK going for a manageable fourth-down try. But I can see arguments either way.

by maryrose on Oct 27, 2008 1:55 PM EDT reply actions  

Hard to fathom that the coaches didn't trust the snap on a FG try

…well inside the opposition territory, where the worst case scenario was a missed scoring play, but were willing to risk it on a punt from deep in their own territory where there was an excellant chance of giving up a score if it failed.

by robert ethan on Oct 27, 2008 1:56 PM EDT reply actions  

What were they suppose to do?

Go for 4th down deep in there territory? They had to punt, no question. I know this coaching staff can do know right to you, but you are grasping at straws here.

by _ET_ on Oct 27, 2008 3:45 PM EDT up reply actions  

Quick kick

Have Ben (or maybe Hines) quick kick it.

by WolfpackSteelersFan on Oct 27, 2008 5:41 PM EDT up reply actions  

Maybe

but i feel this has as much or less of a success rate as Silverback snapping.

by _ET_ on Oct 27, 2008 7:29 PM EDT up reply actions  

Ben

is actually a pretty good punter he would punt out of offensive sets in college all the time

by schnifin on Oct 28, 2008 9:16 AM EDT up reply actions  

that makes much more sense

to me. I guess in the thick of the game, I wasn’t thinking about the injury to warren, so I was completely befuddled. I am totally on board now, its understandable to not want to use your ‘back up’ snapper in a situation like that. And it being on the 34 instead of the 30 does make a big difference. 51 yds is a long way for no snapper.

by steelerark on Oct 27, 2008 2:11 PM EDT reply actions  

How about Ben do a pooch punt to try and pin the Giants inside the 20yd line. I would’ve rather seen that cuz an int or turnover on downs changes momentum in game. The safety on the punt proved that. Pooch punt and let your defense do what it does best.

by woody71 on Oct 27, 2008 5:18 PM EDT reply actions  

THe mechanics are very different

on Shotgun you use one hand, have to protect with the other,

on long snap, you use one hand for strenght,(throw) and the other for direction and spiral! So, not the same,,

by SteelerBrazil on Oct 27, 2008 5:31 PM EDT reply actions  

Lets get it straight

Clearly, the long snap is NOT the gimme we uneducated couch players think. I would have thought though that your primary center was the obvious next in line, but maybe not.

Anyway, the go for it was probably the right thing to do. The play call sucked though.

I would have been cool actually seeing Roethlisberger do his patented pooch punt from shotgun, that has worked before to hold em inside the 10.

On the Nate Washington. The one drop was helmet to helmet contact and he didnt move after the hit. No flag, and certainly not his fault he dropped that. The other one was in the tips of his hands, and the defender ripped it out. Nothing you can do when flying through the air.

The other drop WAS his, but honestly he did more help than harm.

by Mechem on Oct 27, 2008 7:51 PM EDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to BTSC, a blog dedicated to the SIX-time world champion Steelers.

"Thoughtful discussion with a sense of history."

Art Rooney Jr.

"Level-headed thinking." Pittsburgh Post-Gazette

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Franco72_small
The Last Sunday
Small
Joe Greene on Steelers Offense Under BA
Small
Homer reps BTSC and Steeler Nation on Washington Post Front Page
Small
Your Super Bowl Hate Guide
Steeler_nation_small
University of BTSC: Masters of Science degree in Steelerology Required Core Course 201: Using Quantum Mechanics to Understand the Baltimore Ravens (and their Fans).

Recent FanPosts

Steel-ball-logo-poster_small
Knowing Your Guards: A look at the 2012 Prospects (Updated 2/11/12)
Rodthreerivers_small
Report: Steelers Don't Want Ward
Small
Analyzing the Steelers 2008 Draft
Small
My Top 11 Prospects for our First Round Pick
Small
Ike Taylor restructures, over 18 million in cap space created so far this offseason
Small
Analyzing the Steelers 2009 Draft
Small
6 Round NFL Mock Draft
Steeler_small
Steelers Cut Their Salary Problem in Half
Small
Woodley restructures contract
Bonek_small
Haley's Day One in Steelers office

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Terrible Towel Talk

Listen to internet radio with Michael Bean on Blog Talk Radio


Site Founder & Editor

Imag0299_small Michael Bean

Steelers Historian

Steeler_small maryrose

Bison_small Neal Coolong

Contributing Authors

Small Ivan Cole (RickVa)

Franco72_small 5020

Btsc_head_shot_small Rebecca Rollett

Small big_jay71

Stogs_small John Stephens

178896_499126548441_596563441_5939410_7960015_n_small Anthony Defeo