Pittsburgh Steelers Positional Review: The Running Backs
Let's continue our review of each and every Steelers player through five games with a breakdown of our running backs.
WILLIE PARKER
For Willie Parker, the start of 2008 was much like the beginning of last year. For two years running now, Parker has gotten off to a torrid start, earning AFC Player of the Week honors after his 138 yard 3 TD performance against Houston in Week 1. He followed that up with another 100+ yard game against Cleveland before being stuffed and ultimately injured against Philadelphia in Week 3. Parker should be back when the Steelers return to action against the Cincinnati Bengals in Week 7. With Mewelde Moore garnering more attention as an intriguing offensive weapon for this offense, it should be very interesting to see how Bruce Arians uses both him and Parker moving forward. Obviously Parker will get the lion's share of the carries, but if Arians were wise, he might deploy Moore on 1st and 2nd down on occassion, not simply use him as a 3rd down back. One thing we all probably agree on is the need for this offense to continue to evolve and try new things moving forward. I, personally, am very interested to see first if that will happen, and secondly, if so, how will Parker fit in to said changes.
RASHARD MENDENHALL
Poor guy. Just as soon as he gets his opportunity to make something happen, Ray Lewis deals him a crushing blow to the shoulder and breaks one of his bones. If you had forgotten, Rashard had made a couple of nice runs in that Baltimore game before going down. A very unfortunate break for the rookie, but if nothing else, it should make him hungry as imaginable to prove he was worthy of his high draft status next year.
MEWELDE MOORE
Outside of Ben Roethlisberger, Mewelde Moore would have to be considered the team's offensive MVP the past two weeks. In consecutive games, Moore came through with the goods on the final dive of the game. Against Baltimore, it was his pass catching primarily that set up the game-winning Jeff Reed FG. Against Jacksonville, he did it with both his hands and feet. He finished 1 yard shy of the century mark, and caught several cruical passes in both halves of the game. One man's trash is another man's treasure, baby. Moore has a deceptive elusiveness to him, and good insticts to go along with it. He's been as successful as Parker and Mendenhall were picking up those uninpsiring 2-3 yards up the middle, yet he's shown a nice aptitude for finding a crease when running outside the tackle, then either falling forward for another couple of extra yards or flashing nifty footwork and staying in bounds, as was the case on his long 25+ yard scamper against Jacksonville on our final drive of the game. Moore may just be the exact type of guy we need this year on an offense that may have problems establishing any sort of consistent rhtythm on offense. He should be catching 3-5 passes a game, and it might be wise to mix in some draws to him as well on 3rd downs when defenses try to tee off against our line. This is off the top of my head, but it seems as if we are in plenty of 3rd and 5-8 yard situations where Moore might be able to race by a blitzing defense for positive yardage.
CAREY DAVIS
Davis has done everything that has been asked of him in 2008. He's done a little blocking, some pass catching, and some ball carrying when we suddenly found ourselves without our top 2 guys. Davis himself went down with an injury in the Baltimore game and its unclear what his future with the team might be. For the year he has 10 carries for 18 yards and 2 catches for 9 yards. If the team opts to keep Gary Russell around and Najeh Davenport, is there a need to keep five guys at RB, particularly with Sean McHugh showing solid acumen as a lead blocker? I don't think there is. So in my mind, either Davis, Russell or Davenport has to be the odd man out. We've aleady seen that Moore is more than capable of filling in in a pinch, even as a #1 type guy, so why keep 3 guys (Dookie, Carey, Gary) who cumulatively might only be vying for a few carries per game? We'll see. Davis has been good on special teams too, so that's something to consider.
NAJEH DAVENPORT
Najeh returned a few kicks and rushed the ball once in his return to the Steelers against the Jags. We'll see what his future holds when roster decisions are made public next week in preparation for the Bengals game. What do you guys think? Will he be dismissed or do you think we'll keep him around in place of Russell or Davis?
GARY RUSSELL
Russell continues to fight the uphill battle towards getting an opportunity to carry the ball in this league. He got a few calls last week and did just fine, but for whatever reason, he continues to find himself the odd man out when injurys are no longer a concern. We'll see if he catches a break this time around any day now.
0 recs |
23
comments
Comments
My opinion
I think Carey davis is the odd man out. If nothing else for financial reasons. We can work with the rest of the rb’s/ te. I think this is the formula going into the rest of the season. We have quickness, strength between the tackles, catching out of the backfield ,and YAC’s.
Carey Davis just is not that much of a physical talent. Plus we can put any of tose others on special teams and it should’nt be that much of a loss.
Your thoughts?
by C-Mac on Oct 9, 2008 9:53 AM EDT 0 recs
Supposedly davis does well on special teams.
Dookie catches the ball on returns and runs straight into the largest guy on the other team.
For pure RB, I like russell because he is cheap now and has a future.
by steelguy99 on
Oct 9, 2008 10:13 AM EDT
up
0 recs
Carey Davis has some value
- He led the team in special teams tackles last year.
- He’s the only guy on the roster who can play fullback and he can RB in a pinch.
- He may not be a ‘physical talent’ but he’s athletic enough to carry the ball and a decent option out of the backfield.
- He’s incredibly cheap.
Overall he’s exactly what you’d want in a backup. He’s cheap and able to do a lot of different things to help you win ball games. He’s above Dookie and Russell on the depth chart.
by cgolden on
Oct 9, 2008 11:40 AM EDT
up
0 recs
davis
i also think that carey davis is the odd man out. mchugh does seem to be a better blocker, and we have people to fill in out st. i would much rather keep russell than davis, and i can’t believe that davenport would possibly be back next year.
by NoCal-SteelCity on Oct 9, 2008 11:38 AM EDT 0 recs
Russel seems like a pounder
He just seems to play bigger than the rest of the guys after contact. I don’t know if that’s just he difference between a guy who is a lock and a guy who is struggling to make the team, but I love the way he hits after contact.
by SteelerBuddha on
Oct 9, 2008 11:48 AM EDT
up
0 recs
Davenport
The only running play I remember him in was the short yardage run from the fb position for a first down. It looked to me like a gap that russell or davis could have made. When I try to remember when Davenport really impressed last year, it was typically on screens, and I think we’re all excited about Moore getting more of those calls. As long as Moore will be back to returning kicks, I think Davenport is out.
by phxsteeler on Oct 9, 2008 11:49 AM EDT 0 recs
Can we all agree
That Davenport will never return a kick pas the thirty yard line? I vote trying a radical strategy which has been adopted by some other teams in the league and putting somebody fast back there.
by SteelerBuddha on
Oct 9, 2008 11:58 AM EDT
up
0 recs
Everytime he returns a kick
I punch myself in the face.
by BallsofSteel on
Oct 9, 2008 1:57 PM EDT
up
0 recs
Who is going to run into the biggest guy on the field then?
by frankrmineo on Oct 9, 2008 12:28 PM EDT 0 recs
LOL
I always say, let players do what they are good at.
Dookie’s strategy would work so well, if he wasn’t carrying the ball. At 250 pounds and a nose for the big guys, he might be able to block, freeing up somebody with more speed and elusiveness (anyone on the team not on the O-Line or named Hampton) to return the kick.
by SteelerBuddha on
Oct 9, 2008 12:38 PM EDT
up
0 recs
Keep Davis and Russell
Davis has been too vaulable to the ST to let go. We are finally doing a consistent (and decent) job of coverage on our kicking teams. The philosophy of “someone else will fill in” is what led to last year’s disastrous ST coverages imo.
Russell’s few touches always seem to have a nice break thru run or two. I would love to see him get some quality PT, but I dont honestly believe it will happen.
Never been a Dookie fan. The 3 yard flop for a 1st down was appreciated, but lame.
Got 5? ... We do! Check the RINGS!!!
by warftr5 on Oct 9, 2008 1:37 PM EDT 0 recs
Odd man out
I agree with those that say let Davenport go. With FWP back, I’d rather keep Davis’s effectiveness on STs, and give Russell some looks that Mendy would have gotten. We also need to make sure we increase Moore’s touches going forward. He may become our Dave Meggett.
by WolfpackSteelersFan on Oct 9, 2008 2:44 PM EDT 0 recs
Dookie
was an emergency fill in who happened to know the system, and god love him for that. However, if he were thought to be better than Russell or Davis, he would have been on the team before. I have liked what I have seen from from the younger guys, and Moore is definitely not going anywhere. Keep your cell on Najeh, and no hard feelings, OK!
"Steeler Nation= We are better than you!"
by il_steeler_fan on Oct 9, 2008 2:46 PM EDT 0 recs
just thought about this after reading your last sentance
But is anyone surprised that they brought back Najeh instead of Verron Haynes?
by cgolden on
Oct 9, 2008 3:15 PM EDT
up
0 recs
I am a little
but my guess is Verron still may not be 100% healthy.
"Steeler Nation= We are better than you!"
by il_steeler_fan on
Oct 9, 2008 3:20 PM EDT
up
0 recs
Running backs
As for the immediate discussion, Dookie should be the odd man out. He’s an older veteran (read ’expensive’) and not terribly versatile with relatively little upside compared to the other backs. Davis is more versatile, Russell is a better runner. And if we cut Russell again we might find he won’t be available later. I’m sure somebody saw the talent Sunday night.
What was proven on Sunday was that those of us who were fans of Moore and Russell are not just a bunch of cockeyed optimists. These two guys can play, if given a chance behind a quality O-line. What was proven is that we have terrific depth at running back. Here’s the problem; does our coaching staff, particularly BA know how to utilize them fully other than as insurance against the top guy going down?
This is where I have arrived concerning Arians after watching the game the other night. Pretty good strategist, but poor (so far) on tactics. He’s slow on adjustments, doesn’t think in layered ways, doesn’t anticipate adjustments by his defensive counterpart and have counter adjustments ready to go, doesn’t punch in combinations. The list goes on. If I’m sounding like a starry eyed homer here please correct me, but honest to god I think the Steelers have one of the most complex arsenals of offensive weapons in the league. The statement may seem ridiculous given our performance in games 2 thru 4, but I contend that is because we play with arms and legs tied behind our backs. We can run outside, inside, with speed, power or elusiveness. Possession passing or homerun ball. Deception? get Dixon on the field. Hines was a college quarterback like Randle El. Are players like Baker and Sweed not ready to play or is the coaching staff not ready to play them? The fact that it took Parker and Mendenhall to go down before we discovered what Moore was capable of is troublesome. That a player of Russell’s ability is languishing on the practice squad is disturbing. The only plausible answer I can think of is that we didn’t want to show all we had until later in the season. The injuries ramped up the timetable. Wouldn’t be nice if we played FWP, Moore and Russell in combination from here on out. Wouldn’t it be depressing if we once again run Willie until the wheels come off, then run Moore ’til the wheels come off, then run Russell,,,,
by RickVa on Oct 9, 2008 3:50 PM EDT 0 recs
Great analysis
I think you’re dead on. Arians can come up with some good stuff during the week. He has some great plays. He just can’t seem to think ahead during a game.
by WolfpackSteelersFan on
Oct 9, 2008 4:37 PM EDT
up
0 recs
very nice
It is nice to to know that we’re not just optimists. The same thing is true of Woodley: we were all excited about what he would do this year, but part of me was thinking we were just being homers. Well, 5.5 sacks and several beaten double teams later, I’d say we were justufied. The same is true of Moore and Russel, and maybe even Stapleton and McFadden. Maybe we’ll find out some day about Timmons.
You’re right on about how we split carries. Last year we had horrible depth, so it was understandable – kind of. Parker has been running even more per game this year, which is just plain stupid. I hope we do option A, but I’m pessimistic that we’ll do option B.
charity standing orders
by BadMaafala on
Oct 9, 2008 6:23 PM EDT
up
0 recs
did you see
Aaron Smith’s quote about Timmons in a Trib-Review article. The article itself said Timmons was being held back because they haven’t used alot of the complicated blitzes (alot of which have Timmons on the field), and that Timmons might actually be the best pure pass-rusher on the team when we do start unloading those blitzes. Anyways, the article link is here and here is the quote I was talking about:
“Look out!” defensive end Aaron Smith predicted. “He’s so young, but he’s so talented. He’s a good player now and going to get better. In two or three years, he’s going to be unbelievable. I think he might be the best player in the NFL in two years.”
That’s some hefty praise from an All-Pro caliber DE.
by TheMostViolentTeam on
Oct 9, 2008 7:10 PM EDT
up
0 recs
geez
I don’t think any other team can quite match our ability to consistently draft the top talents in the league and sit them on the bench.
charity standing orders
by BadMaafala on
Oct 9, 2008 11:03 PM EDT
up
0 recs
Hmm
I like the idea of letting Dookie go, but the Steelers were going with 5 RBs (4 dressed 1 not dressed) before the injuries. Sadly I think we will stay with that format the rest of the season unless we get another rash of injuries in another area. I am just wondering who won’t dress for the game. I think it will be Dookie or Russell if Davis is healthy.
by SteelBuckeye on Oct 9, 2008 4:54 PM EDT 0 recs












