Pittsburgh Steelers Positional Review: The Defensive Backs
Blitz started reviewing every Steelers player by position, so I'll help him out a bit and do the DB's. I don't have YPA numbers for these guys, so if someone wanted to add those for the starters, that would be cool.
Ike Taylor
Taylor has been solid at CB. I'm pretty sure he's only been beaten deep once (sadly by a white former college QB), which resulted in an odd but probably correct PI call. Ike is very good at staying with WR's in coverage, but not always great at playing the ball if QB's challenge him, and this year is about par for him. Teams have not challenged him a whole lot this year, so it's hard to judge his overall performance. He has yet to record a deflected pass or an interception in 5 games, which is incredible for a starting CB who isn't terrible.
Bryant McFadden
It's difficult to say if McFadden is benefitting from playing full time or if he truly took a step forward this offseason, but he looks like a different player. When he came in during nickel situations last year, he looked passive. In the games he's played so far, he's been the Steelers best CB. I doubt McFadden is quite the athlete Ike is, but this year he's playing the ball as well as any Steeler corner I've seen since Woodson. It's still early in the season, so it's possible opposing teams will adjust some to him and find a weakness (maybe double moves?), but so far it's been great to have a playmaker at CB.
Deshea Townsend
Coming off his best year as a pro in 2007, Townsend has had some injuries and been a little disappointing so far this year. When McFadden started playing well, I was excited to see the 2007 version of Townsend come back into the lineup as a nickel back, but when crunch time came against Baltimore, he gave up a big pass play and missed the tackle that put the Ravens inside the 10. He could still be affected by the injury, but if he doesn't look more like 2007 Deshea before the end of the season, I'll be even more nervous about letting McFadden walk at the end of the season.
Troy Polamalu
There are two types of safeties that get recognition in the NFL: hard hitting, blow-up-the-runner strong safeties, and ball-hawking free safeties. So far in 2008, Polamalu has been the superhuman combination of those two. We know the story: after earning his hype in 2004 and 2005, he fought injuries, flew past ball carriers, and got beat in coverage in 2006 and 2007. Well, I would say he's back, but that doesn't do him justice. So far this season, he's broken up numerous deep passes, made 3 interceptions including maybe the most acrobatic catch I've ever seen, thrown TE's into the backfield on running plays, flown to the ball on screen plays and MADE THE TACKLE, showed incredible range, limited Kellen Winslow while covering him for a whole game, tackled a guy behind his back, and jumped over the offensive line. He's one of the best run defenders on our team, and he might be the best pass defender as well. I don't know how he could be anything other than the most versitile player in the NFL and the defensive player of the year if he keeps playing like this. Some of his best competition for DPOY will probably come from Harrison and Woodley.
Ryan Clark
Clark has gone from being solid but unexciting to desperately missed to back towards solid but unexciting. He's played more in run support than in years past, and he's looked good doing it. He has a couple of nice pass breakups, but missed a read and was the primary perpetrator on a fairly long TD pass against the Jags. He hasn't stood out much, good or bad, which is fine. We need a solid guy who won't make huge mental mistakes, and that's what we have in him.
William Gay/Anthony Madison/Tyrone Carter/Anthony Smith
I haven't seen these guys on the field much on defense, but a couple have really made their presence felt on special teams. Madison in particular has been a force on the coverage units recently. Gay may have gotten the most playing time of the bunch, and he didn't look like a liability in nickel packages against the Browns.
0 recs |
42 comments
Comments
nice stuff Bad
I was going to do this myself even but you beat me to it. Agree with you on everything, as far as YPA, KC Joyner has Ike and Townsend both at 10 (which is very bad) and McFadden at 5.4 (which is elite). Townsend I think is because of injuries, he looked good in the first game, but after the injury hasn’t. One note on Ike Taylor; the NFL Scouting service has him at about 5.3 YPA, and in an article I quoted earlier this week, said he was the best Steelers corner for sure.
So obviously, there are discrepancies in how these scouts regard coverage. I’d lean toward accepting the Scouting Services number for Ike, as they have been doing it longer, and are probably better acclimated with the zone coverages we play. Ike does alot of bumping receivers off of routes, and then passing them onto the safety so he can play run support, and he does this extremely well. The two deep balls to Mason broken up by Polamalu were a result of this. Polamalu got the highlight, but Ike did a good job of being physical with the receiver off the snap as well, helping Troy get time to get over.
McFadden is definitely a much better ball hawk and more aggressive going after the pick than Ike, he hasn’t been burned by it yet, but he may be later in the season (look at Cromartie this year as teams have picked up on his tendency to jump routes early).
Clark has been solid and unspectacular, I’ve seen him blitz on a couple of occasions even, and obviously this is done because teams are expecting Troy to come, and then Clark comes and they think they have an opening on the deep end, but Troy flies back to the ball and makes the play. Great design by LeBeau.
Troy. Yup, DPOY of the year, by FAR this year. Can’t remember him making a mistake yet. Sure he allowed a couple completions against Winslow, but he broke up a few as well and did a great job giving up a ton of size. He can play 4 positions at a very high level: SS, FS, CB, and LB. Simply incredible. At the height of his powers, even better than 04-05 when he was healthy. You are right that if either Harrison or Woodley end up with 20 sacks they will probably get it because of the bias towards pass-rushers in the POY voting. We’ll see though, if Troy ends up with 6-8 picks, tons of tackles and a few sacks, FRs, FFs, he’ll be right there.
by TheMostViolentTeam on Oct 9, 2008 6:44 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Sorry if I stole your thunder. Blitz said the LB’s were the only position that was taken. That’s pretty interesting about that huge discrepancy about Ike. I suppose it fits since he does some things incredibly well, and others somewhat poorly. It’s definitely nice to have that physically intimidating presence. I also think that his speed/size combo gives LeBeau a lot of flexibility. Even if he doesn’t make the best play on the ball, he can stay with any WR, making it difficult to complete deep passes and making tackles when necessary if Lebeau assigns him to a deep zone.
charity standing orders
by BadMaafala on Oct 9, 2008 10:37 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
haha
didn’t mean you stole my thunder, I was just about to write one anyways, I am working on an LB piece. You are right that he is exactly the type of corner that LeBeau likes.
by TheMostViolentTeam on Oct 9, 2008 11:51 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
McFadden
I’m not sure what the contract and money situation is right now but I can’t see us letting McFadden go. It would be a huge mistake. He is playing like an all-star and I would be truly disappointed if we didn’t keep him.
by shleeve on Oct 9, 2008 7:23 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
ike and bmac
at 28 and 27 yrs old respectively, we could have 3-4 more seasons of solid CB play out of them. i am a firm believer that a strong defense starts up front…but having solid play out of your corners is imperative to having a successful defense. ike and bmac are both playing outstanding ball, and the results speak for themselves. i would hope that the FO notices that and resigns bmac.
troy = freak. best safety in the game. period.
by NoCal-SteelCity on Oct 9, 2008 7:59 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Good Stuff
Didn’ t know Ike was that good in bump coverage, I always felt that he could be around the ball but couldn’t always get a hand on it (hence no pics since when?), read an article on SI.com about how good Shawn Springs does against TO because he can get physical (with success). We do play them this year, so that is a little more incouraging. Also shows how the secondary must play like one much like the o-line.
I do hope we can re-sign Big Mac, especially if he can keep up the solid play. Tomlin did switch Ike to the right side, I forget the reason though. If we did indeed have a CB who could lock down his side of the field the D will be mentioned with the great ones of all time.
I think it might be the injury that Deshea is suffering from, numerous times players and coaches alike have said that he is the smartest of the DB’s, and you don’t lose that with time. Now he was never the fastest nor that athletic in terms of jumping. So age isn’t as much of a detriment to his abilities.
Troy is flat out amazing although he did get beat on the goal line play action in the Balt game. Still, I’ll take him over any safety someone cares to throw out there, go ’head I DARE YOU!!!!
Ryan Clark is ok, and thats really all we need right now, though he has made a play or two. I’m more concerned about how far Anthony Smith has fallen down the depth chart. Here’s to Ryan Mundy getting well soon!
60 minute men
by I.W.H.F.M.D.95 on Oct 9, 2008 8:19 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Yeah
Troy did give up that one play where he was cheating on the run.
charity standing orders
by BadMaafala on Oct 9, 2008 10:21 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Ike
is very good when he is in press coverage. my theory is because he is strong and has an effective jam, but also because then he just turns and run with the WR right away and he can run with anybody, as opposed to playing off the LOS and then having to read a route; which is where you are more likely to give up a short pass. however, LeBeau wants him way off the LOS alot to read the run and play in run support. our 3-4 system is very different from most others (like Baltimore) in that we ask our corners to do a ton in run support. that’s why Ike isn’t in press coverage alot, but take note of it in the next games, when he is in press coverage he is phenomenal.
by TheMostViolentTeam on Oct 9, 2008 11:50 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
good stuff indeed
Thanks Bad.
GOod insights about BMac and him no longer being passive. He really is breaking on the ball confidently and he’s yet to get burned. Nice combination of instincts and athleticism.
I have a very bad feeling though that we’re not going to do what it takes to lock him up after this year. It’s going to cost some serious $$$. I hope we don’t blow this one.
by Blitzburgh on Oct 9, 2008 8:19 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
B-Mac
I would rather see the Steelers resign B-Mac and trade Taylor. He is a young guy who is blooming into something special, just took him a while. Taylor hasn’t played the same since being paid. Now if they would make a move in FA or draft a stud Taylor is expesable. Townsend in the nickle, Gay as dime. Now I don’t like to look that far ahead but its a bye week, so not much else to talk about. Go Steelers
by steelcitykid on Oct 9, 2008 8:57 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Taylor
is very good. he may give up short completions that are annoying, but he rarely allows touchdowns. he does everything LeBeau asks. phenomenal in run support.
by TheMostViolentTeam on Oct 9, 2008 11:48 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Announcers like to mention the huge cushion that he often allows to receivers, but of course they neglect to mention why that cushion exists. I also read earlier on this site that a lot less balls seem to be thrown Ike’s way, which has a lot to do with his coverage.
by steelguy99 on Oct 10, 2008 9:27 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
what?
first of all, taylor is one year older than bmac. second, it is extremely rare to find a corner as big, and physical as taylor that is willing to play in a defensive scheme like ours (see TMVT’s comment above). third, we don’t exactly have a good recent history of drafting corners that turn out to be too strong (ie, former 2nd round pick ricardo colcough). fourth, there won’t be much value for ike because he doesn’t put up big numbers in terms of ints.
we already have him signed, we (the FO) should focus on maintaining the cbs they have, instead of trying to rebuild or reshape it.
by NoCal-SteelCity on Oct 10, 2008 11:54 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Ike
also restructured his deal this past off-season, converted roster bonuses and some of his salary to signing bonuses to free up cap-space. when we originally signed him he also took less than he could’ve gotten on the free market after his big role in the Super Bowl run.
by TheMostViolentTeam on Oct 10, 2008 1:46 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Guys
Well, think about it if B-Mac leaves then won’t will be rebuilding at corner anyway! Do you expect Townsend to still maintain a starting role next year, if not who takes over. Gay! If it is between Taylor or McFadden who would you take? Either way the Steelers will either 1. draft a corner or 2. get a FA or 3. do nothing. Also do the math, McFadden is 26 and Taylor is 28 not that it is a big difference but…. Taylor is way overrated here and none of our corners really allow TDs, just those frusterating first and 20s that lead to scores. Think about it.
by steelcitykid on Oct 10, 2008 5:58 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
that's great but
as TMVT pointed out, a lot of Taylor’s price is guaranteed as this point. If we cut or trade him, we’re going to have a large cap hit that will negate most of the savings, and honestly I doubt we’d get a whole lot in return for him in a trade. I don’t know what the numbers are, but we’d probably pay close to 50% of his salary for nothing. I don’t think that makes financial sense.
charity standing orders
by BadMaafala on Oct 11, 2008 2:09 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Clark
OK, so I am a little bit biased, but I’ve been watching my adopted Steeler as closely as I can. I think he is playing very well.
I’ve made the point several times before, but I think that he has been solid in the passing game – few big plays, always in position, and vicious in the run game. He looks like he took tackling lessons from Troy. He isn’t wrapping up back, he’s launching himself into them. I think that he has been underrated this year so far.
by SteelerBuddha on Oct 10, 2008 12:26 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Thanks
I’m sure you’ve been watching him more than me. I’ve seen him make a couple tackles, break up a pass or two, and that ugly PF+TD sequence of his against the Jags. I have noticed he’s been more agressive while tackling, which probably isn’t a bad thing.
charity standing orders
by BadMaafala on Oct 10, 2008 8:39 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Troy
I remember a lot of Polamalu doubters on this site over the summer. I tried to tell everyone he never went anywhere, and hes really proving me right this year. Its almost like hes playing fast but not out of control. I think a sack or two might help his chances for defensive mvp. I`m sure he will have at least 6 ints before the season is over.
As far as the rest of the secondary i agree that they are all playing well. Townsend looks like he has lost a step with that heel, but hopefully the bye takes care of that. Clark quietly playing solid. He takes good angles to the ball and is rarely out of position.
by SteelerDomination on Oct 10, 2008 2:30 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I'll admit to being a doubter
The reason being that he didn’t play anywhere near what he’s doing this year in 2006 or 2007. I readily acknowledged how good he was in ‘04 and ’05, but if he didn’t get over his injuries and play better, I would still be disappointed in him. Well, I think it’s safe to say I’m not disappointed this year.
charity standing orders
by BadMaafala on Oct 10, 2008 8:35 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I’m not disappointed at all, but he has to stay healthy, and if he can’t stay healthy for more than half the season it is not good for the steelers…
by steelguy99 on Oct 10, 2008 9:29 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Taylor is one of the softest corners in the league..
…as far as coverage is concerned. QBs could throw underneath him all game long if they wanted to. For my money he is the weakest spot on the defense at the moment, despite all the hype he gets (or gives himself) from some Steeler fans.
by robert ethan on Oct 10, 2008 2:00 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
You’re an idiot if you think Ike is worse at his job than Foote is at his.
charity standing orders
by BadMaafala on Oct 10, 2008 2:43 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
As a group, the defensive backfield is an area of concern..
..in the near future. Polomalu and Clark are both a bit brittle at the safety spots, particularly considering the demands of the position in the Steeler scheme. None of the corners on hand are outstanding or ever will be. Outside of Troy there isn’t much natural talent at the position in comparison to the LBs or the front three. It is a unit that has just been hanging on through a combination of Dick Lebeau’s genius and the play of the defenders at the line of scrimmage.
Top priority at next year’s draft IMHO.
by robert ethan on Oct 10, 2008 2:08 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Top Priority?
Above O-Line and D-Line? wow… I admit we’ll be weak if we don’t resign mcfadden, but not that weak. Also I’m kinda curious what team you look at and think they have a really solid personnel grouping? You are fairly negative to the steelers time and time again, although I think talent wise they stack up against every team in the league.
by Chicago Steeler on Oct 10, 2008 2:14 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
then explain
last year when our LBs and DL didn’t get alot of pressure and yet our secondary was incredible all year. I’ll give you that the pressure the DL/LBs are creating is helping the secondary be even better than last year, but they all put up great numbers last year with lots of injuries and very little pressure.
by TheMostViolentTeam on Oct 10, 2008 2:14 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I’m not agreeing with re, but the offenses we faced last year were so laughable that I think we should avoid using any stats from last year as proof of our competance. Of the half decent offenses we played, the majority put up at leat 20 points, with the one exception being the Seahawks. I’m not counting the week 1 Browns.
charity standing orders
by BadMaafala on Oct 10, 2008 2:30 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
sure
but our secondary was still very good last year, even when you account for the weak offenses we faced.
by TheMostViolentTeam on Oct 10, 2008 2:45 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Fine, but
there’s no way to prove that because we can’t quantify how much the poor offenses affected our play and numbers. Our best look into how we would have played against quality offenses is when we actually played quality offenses, and for the most part in those games, we didn’t look like an elite Raven-esque defense.
charity standing orders
by BadMaafala on Oct 10, 2008 3:11 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Oh my!!! I don’t know how to respond!! robert ethan took a contrary position!!!! “Everyone” says that our secondary is the best in the world – no – even the best imaginable. How could robert ethan question this? Who is he? Ike is the best corner in the league. “Everyone” knows this. How could robert ethan say he has a flaw? “Everyone” just finished talking about how great Ike is at playing the ball, and robert ethan defied “everyone”. gasp
charity standing orders
by BadMaafala on Oct 10, 2008 2:42 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
the last sentence should read:
(asterisk) gasp (asterisk)
charity standing orders
by BadMaafala on Oct 10, 2008 2:44 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Need an upgrade over Clark and An. Smith and Carter!! Troy is not brittle!!!! What the bleep are you talking about! Clark maybe.
by steelcitykid on Oct 10, 2008 6:01 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Let's talk past tense
Troy has been brittle. Actually that might be Past Perfect, I forget, but the point is, let’s hope that with an off-season where Troy got to be Troy and do his own thing, let’s hope he can change the brittle factor.
So far he’s making the same hits and athletic plays of the old Troy and while getting banged up he’s still looked good every game. So far this year, not as brittle.
by Chicago Steeler on Oct 13, 2008 5:44 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
True, but 5 games does not make a season. I remain cautiously optimistic.
by steelguy99 on Oct 14, 2008 10:03 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
"none of our corners are outstanding"
how many “outstanding” cbs are there in the league? woodson, bailey, samuel, cromartie, mathis, asomugha (from oakland)…any others? maybe nate clements, and maybe in the future finnegan from the titans? if you’re looking to have two “outstanding” cbs, then you’re going to be looking for awhile. we haven’t had an “outstanding” cb since rod woodson.
ike and bmac are both well-above average cbs, and both play very physical football who provide solid help in run support, which has been the cornerstone of the steelers defense for the past 30+ years.
it seems like too much of an emphasis is being placed on individual talent/athleticism in the secondary. this defense is not about stars, its about scheme. dick lebeau has not built a one-of-a-kind legacy because he makes the most out of his star players…he’s a genius for creating defensive schemes that offenses and o-coordinators can’t figure out, and he’s done that with name like lloyd, greene, woodson, polamalu…AND with names like foote, keisel, hope, townsend, and hoke. i think cohesion-wise (which is absolutely vital to the success of a defense…ask a guy like ray lewis) this is the best secondary we’ve had since the mid-90’s.
and of course the success of the secondary depends on the pressure the dline/lbs gets on the qb…even a secondary of all-pros can only cover wideouts for so long. any qb with 7 seconds to throw the ball can find an open wide receiver.
by NoCal-SteelCity on Oct 10, 2008 5:40 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
furthermore
we currently have the following defensive rankings in the NFL:
Rush YPG – 66.8 – 2nd
Pass YPG – 164.8 – 5th
Scoring D – 15.8 pts – 5th
Total D – 231.6 ypg – 2nd
Hard to complain with those numbers.
The 5 offenses that we’ve played against so far, combined, average the following:
Rush YPG – 107.9
Pass YPG – 185.9
Scoring O – 19.6
Total O – 293.9
So, while we may not have played against the most stellar of offenses, we are still, collectively, holding our opponents below there season averages.
by NoCal-SteelCity on Oct 10, 2008 6:03 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
nice numbers
Thanks
charity standing orders
by BadMaafala on Oct 11, 2008 2:12 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Tomlin coaching
I had my doubts about the secondary early on, especially against Philly when we didn’t have a pass rush and somehow we didn’t cover either. But now it looks like we straightened things out, which leads to my question:
Do you think our secondary is improved this year over previous years because Tomlin is in at head coach? I know he coached secondary in Tampa, and I’m wondering what kind of impact he’s had on these guys
by WPIALkid22 on Oct 15, 2008 12:27 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
i think hes had a huge impact in this regard
Particularly with Bryant McFadden. He showed signs last year, but really has taken some major steps forward. I think part of that has to be coaching.
by Blitzburgh on Oct 16, 2008 12:17 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs

by 




















