Behind the Steel Curtain: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
Around SBN: Spencer Hall's Sports Meme Power Rankings

Steeler football?

I'd like to address the topic of our lack of a power running game that most announcers (and some on this board) continue to lament adnauseam.

Let me say up front it IS important that we run the ball...but:

1.  I feel our "identity" as an offense in 2008 should be the same it was in our 2006 playoff run and SB win...pass first to get the lead and then run.

2.  And speaking of the SB, take away FWP 75 yard TD run and it's a different game.  That play swung the momentum big time.  If Bettis is in on that play, he probably gains 20 yards instead of a TD and who know we may end up settling for a field goal. 

3.  It is almost impossible to physically dominant a playoff/SB caliber defense by running it down their throat.  In those games, you must pass first to loosen the defense up and then run the ball.

4. Historically, for the years when we had our dominant "power" running game and mediocre passing game (K. Stewart), the dominant defenses (Baltimore, NE etc) would stuff us at the LOS.  I have vivid memories of Bettis stuck 3 yards in the backfield, time and time again, in those big playoff games.  They would force us to throw and we lost.

5.  I also find it ironic, our second to last trip to SB in 1995/6, that our offense was much more pass orientated.  I don't know where we ranked in rushing, but I do remember Neil O'Donnel and the 5 receiver sets (Mills, Slash, Hastings, Thigpen?, ?) being the thrust of the offense.  Our RB's Eric Peagram and Bam Morris were good but seemed to provide just enough balance to make it work.  Even though Bam was big, I don't think we were considered a "power" running team.  Again, we semed to "pass" our way to the SB.  (btw, I was actually at the game...had a perfect view of the ball flying near Hatings while he never broke off his route!!!...but I digress)

6.  Why pass on 3rd and 2?  It seems to be the new trend for most teams in the league.  3rd and 2 or 3 yards spread it out and find the open receiver.  I know some on the board have voiced a desire to ram it down the other teams throats in such situations.  IMO, I don't care how we convert as long as we do.

7. Offensive personnel.  From our OLine, to our $100M QB, to our 210lb backs...we are not a Power running team.  Thats okay with me.  Just because we may not be a "power" running team does not mean that we can't be effective running the ball!!

  I happen to think that FWP, MM, GR (and a OLine thats starting to gel) can give us  what we need from the running game.  Very similar, in my view, the way Eric Peagram and Bam did in 1995/6.

So please, can we stop longing for the days of a power running game and the days of Jerome Bettis.   Lets stop talking about acquiring a "power' back like Brandon Jacobs. 

I know the 2008 offensive stats are down...but it doesn't matter.  Game by game improvements....get a little offensive momentum going...effective running game...controlled passing...take our deep shots...no huddle to provide a spark...limit turnovers...just move the chains baby...

To sum up...I am so tired of all the TV and radio people say the Steelers need to go back to "old Steeler football" of  power running and 3 yards and a cloud of dust.  It seems to me, and history proves, that we need to be able to throw to win against playoff/SB caliber defenses.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

0 recs  |  Comment 12 comments

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

Why?

Sorry if my or others desire for power football sickens you. (see definition of ad nauseam) Why do I or anyone have to stop longing for the day? Why can’t some fans have different opinions than others? Is this not AMERICAN football? Are we in communist China? Wouldn’t this be a boring site if we all agreed and sang kumbaya all the time? Blitz could shut down and concentrate on school 24/7.

You speak about the playoffs under Cowher and how we were stuffed by the good defenses. I offer the explanation that during those years we featured one main back and lame QB play. Jerome Bettis would literally carry the Steelers to the playoffs years after year, carry after carry. He usually got no help from the QB or OC. Once January rolled around Bettis (350 carries in) was usually worn down. Remember the year the guy needed a shot in the groin to try to play? With QB like Kordell and Tomczak opponents defenses had no respect for our passing game (rightfully so…see Kordell in 97 AFC Championship) and stacked against the run. That is what shut us down. 8 or 9 in the box and no QB. It wasn’t because we only ran. How many picks did Stew throw in the 97 AFCC? Remember Bettis had 120 that day and was unstoppable but Chan Gailey had the Steelers throwing? INT INT INT as I recall.

You mention SB 30 Mike. Bam Morris was a power back who was destroying the Cowboys in the 2nd half of that game. He had ammassed 73 yards midway through the 4th quarter. Had we continued running instead of turning Horseface loose to pass we may have won that game.

I agree Mike that we do not have the personnel to be a power running team. I also agree that this team (like the 05 squad) and other SB contenders must be balanced. It is great to pass to a lead and run to victory. No issue there. I also take no issue in your opinion of wanting to be a passing offense or whatever offense your coordinator mind has construed. That is your right. I just feel that this team has sorely lacked a short yardage back since Bettis retired. Not having anyone to fill that role has hurt this team repeatedly including this year. (until a couple Russell runs recently) Bottom line; while I respect your opinion I will long for whatever and whomever I feel like ad nauseam. I dig the varied opinions expressed on this board and some of the more educated ones have actually caused me to rethink positions. Unfortunately this was not one of them. Keep trying. Maybe next time.

When You Run The Ball Good Things Happen

by 5020 on Nov 23, 2008 12:07 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

Agreed.. sort of...

Hi everyone – I love this forum, but other than having my first experience watching training camp at Latrobe this year and being a steeler fan since I was born (which, for a while, I was convinced ruined the “thumb” chances, since I was born in 1978), I probably am not enough of an expert in football to have a “good” opinion on this forum, so I usually keep my mouth shut.

However…I was watching Superbowl 9 tonight (I bought my dad the dvd box set of Steelers Superbowl victories for his birthday so the whole family could enjoy…hehe) and I was shocked at how different the game was played then, as well as how much we could have all the same complaints about the steelers now that we had then.

I mean, Franco Harris got his 100+ yards rushing in the game all-right, but he fumbled the ball 3 times. Both Franco and Rocky Blier were stuffed in the backfield plenty of times. Bradshaw did as much scrambling around as he did throwing, and the refs seemed to call penalties against the steelers all game. Oh, and, while we’d probably love to have the punter instead of Ernster, the Steelers missed 2 field goals early in the game. It was clear that the defense won the game.

It was just interesting to see how slow the game moved, and how different the play was, for both teams. Now only for the steelers, but for the Vikings. Neither team used the pass much – quarterbacks didn’t slide, they rushed as a regular part of the offense, etc. etc.

Anyway, the point is that memory / legend brings out the best in football teams. In everyone’s mind, Pittsburgh should always be this grind it out running / defensive team because that’s what the Steelers always been. But I wonder how much of that is a year by year / factual statement vs. what everyone remembers in a hazy football Sunday kind of way. How quickly announcers forget the seasons before when all they talked about was the Steelers needing a better QB, and then we didn’t care that we had a power running back.

by QB7rules on Nov 23, 2008 12:24 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

I don’t know crap about football and I always spout my opinion. Don’t be afraid and keep it coming.

Excellent first post, welcome to BTSC!

by steelguy99 on Nov 23, 2008 12:30 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Who`s to say we cant get back to power running?

I really don`t think those days are completely over. We don`t have anything close to a power back like the bus, but what we do have is a pretty diverse running attack. (I`m speaking more for next year) Our line is capable at run blocking, but say we get a lineman or two in next years draft, get Mendenhall back who i think will run with power between the tackles, and we have Russel who looks pretty good in short yardage. Then we have Willie and Moore adding the speed factor. I would say there is a lot to be happy with looking ahead at our running game. While i will agree that our pass needs to set up our run these days, i still think our ground game is our identity.

by SteelerDomination on Nov 23, 2008 3:05 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

Why power running....

Why the power running game is desirous for us (just a few points):

- Wear down opposing defenses. Keep them on the field and break them physically and mentally.

- Control the clock. Staying on the field for long drives keeps the ball in our hands and out of opponents’. Your Mannings and Bradys out there can’t score without possesion.

- Keeps pressure off of the QB – impoves QB health.

- Play-action becomes a weapon when there is an effective running game. Defenses can’t assume pass on almost every down.

- Staying on the field longer gives our defense a chance to be fresh and ready. Even when the offense is running on all cylinders, putting the D back on the field after repeated quick passing attacks downfield leads to tiring out our own defense.

- I’m not sure, but I would assume that more turnovers are generated via the pass than the rush….this has to be the reason that when teams are trying to “run” out the clock they stay on the ground.

Just a few things off the top of my head….

But the thrill of cramming it down the other team’s throat is definitely one of the major factors behind that urge for “good old Steeler’s football.”

by SCSteeler on Nov 23, 2008 10:40 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

5020

Just out of curiosity, which “power” running Steeler offense from the past 15 years would you rather have then our 2008 offense?

Remember, we did not win our last SB until we could throw and throw for points. In SB 30, Bam did have a big second half, but my point was all season we were not a “power” running team, more of a 5 wide out team with an effective ground game…and that got us to the SB.

I also remember during our “power” days (and poor QB play) if the other team got ahead by 10 points or more, we were done. We were great with a lead but against the good playoff/SB caliber teams you can’t always count on getting a lead.

You can long for the days of Bettis all you want. As humans, we always seem to want what we don’t have. And we tend to romantisize the past. My point was this…we went to our last two SB’s and won one NOT because of our power run game but because we could throw.

Agreed, we need to get better in short yardage. To me that is more the play of the OLine than RB. I really like GR in that role.

Again, we need to be able to run…my “offensive coordinators mind” hasn’t constured a pass happy offense. But I have no desire to return to the days where:
  
  - 3rd and long meant an automatic punt
  - losing by 2 TD’s to a good team in the first half?…change the channel…game over
  - power back Bettis running through gapping holes and turning potential 30-40 yard touchdown runs into 10-12 yard gains

So, 5020, I have no desire to stop your longing for the past but the real questions are…

what offensive style has brought the most recent SB success?
what style are our players best suited for now?
what gives us the best chance in 2008?

And, if you say to me, “Mike I just prefer a smash-mouth, grind it out offense”…I say, great, your entitled. If you say, “Mike, I just long for those good, old, Bettis days”…I say, great, your entitled. But, I don’t think thats who we are NOW, nor do I think that gives us the best chance to win, NOW. To me, the most important thing is NOW.

So, I guess my post wasn’t “educated” enough to get you to rethink your position…that’s ok…some people choose to let their preferences, biases, and opinions obscure the reality of facts :.)

BTW, the adnaseum comment, was mostly for the broadcasters. Isn’t anyone else tired of watching the games, and if/when our offense struggles, all the commentators can say is…Steelers need to get back to…blah, blah, blah…

I, for one, have no desire to get back to anything…but move forward, NOW with our 2008 team. GO STEELERS!!

by SteelerMike on Nov 23, 2008 11:11 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

Ad Nauseum

1) Mike, I would prefer many of the past offenses to the one we have in 08. The offense we have in 08 can’t protect the QB (headed for a career high in sacks) can’t pick up 3rd and short, regularly stranded at the goal line, and has gone weeks without scoring TD’s. If this is the O that you think is SB worthy that is your opinion. By the way, what is the Steelers record when Ben throws 24 times or less? What about the Steelers record when Ben throws over 30? I am not Michael J Fox and I don’t want to go back in time. The game has changed but it’s still about blocking and tackling and over powering the guy in front of you. I state again, I am all for balanced offense but unless you have Brady and camera’s trained on the opposing coaches you need a power back if you are going to win a SB.

2) Do you truly remember the team in 95? As I recall, that team was a lot like 05 playoff team (without a clutch QB) that could throw early and then grind it out in the 4th. I think about 5 victories in 95 ended with the Steelers nursing a tight lead late and then grinding out the last 8 minutes of the game on the ground. Morris with first down after first down. Then they would take a knee from the victory formation at shadow of the opponents goal line and get a W. Had they stuck with that philosophy in SB30 in the 4th quarter we would have beaten a tired Cowboy team that day. It was only the willingness to abandon the run and go to the pass that set up another Horseface INT. You may be the only one I have ever known (aside from 14) that blamed that pass on Hastings.

3) It’s not that I “romanticize” about Bettis Mike. Trust me, the 5’10 blonde Cali girlfriend I have allows for reality instead of fantasy. But, bragging aside, I think we need a power back to pick up the big yards in close and grind out a win. The Steelers last year had many leads into the 4th quarter and failed to pick up crucial first downs and grind out the clock to victory. Den, NYJ and Jax last year to name a couple. NYG this year is another example of games the Steelers led late but were unable to win because of a lack of power running. G Russell while doing a commendable job the last couple carries may not be the end all in short yardage backs for the Steelers carrying us to SB victory.

4) Again, I reiterate, my basic problem with your post was not that I didn’t respect your opinion but that you seemed to be calling out anyone that didn’t agree with you. You stated
 “I’d like to address the topic of our lack of a power running game that most announcers (and some on this board) continue to lament adnauseam.”
Now you seem to want to backtrack on your initial statement which is fine. I dig the site because of the varied opinions and idea’s including yours. While I might not agree with some posters they don’t disgust and sicken me. If you don’t like the broadcasters, turn down the sound. If you don’t like others having differing opinions that yours better log off the internet. It’s not your opinion I take issue with Mike, it’s your choice of tone and words. That is my issue with your post. We do agree on one thing today; GO STEELERS!!

When You Run The Ball Good Things Happen

by 5020 on Nov 23, 2008 12:06 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

#6

I have a special post JUST on this. I tracked every single one of our 3rd and 2 – 3rd and 4 situatios all year to see what our tendencies were.

I think you will be shocked.

Any guesses? % throws to passes? I’ll post it in a bit but fire away if you think u might know

by Blitzburgh on Nov 23, 2008 3:42 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

5020

Backtrack? I haven’t backtracked at all. While I may not agree, and yes, I do feel an upchurning of gastric reflexes when I hear “what the Steelers need is a 250+ pound power back”, I never said people weren’t entitled to their opinions (in fact, just the opposite in my above post) That’s why this site is great.

We will have to agree to disagree on this particular topic. A better discussion may be…Bettis v. FWP…who would you prefer? That may be a good topic for another post.

Btw, if I were you 5020, I’d spend more time with my 5’10" blonde Cali-gf and less on BTSC!!!

by SteelerMike on Nov 23, 2008 5:15 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

+1

but Blitz would miss me :)

When You Run The Ball Good Things Happen

by 5020 on Nov 23, 2008 6:28 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

:)

Co*&s away gentlemen.

I just posted long look into this on the main page. I think it gets to the crux of what we’re debating here. I think both of yall are right to a certain degree, and I thikn the solution or middle ground can be found in what my post is about.

by Blitzburgh on Nov 23, 2008 6:36 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Steeler football DOESNT mean having a beast HB

My feelings on this.

We do need to return to Steeler Football. But not in the sense that we need to ditch FWP and all these smaller guys. We just need to revert to some of the playcalling that got us the win.

3rd and 2 is not a passing down. At least, not 90% of the time as we’ve been doing. Its not the right way to play. You have to be able to handle the defense, not skirt around them with 5 WO’s on a play for 5 yards. We need to dominate. Our Defense is feared, why not our offensive strength?

I dont think we need to call a 20 play run only drive, but in certain situations I feel we’ve put our skirts on instead of manning up and slamming it down the throat.

My fondest Steeler memories involve Big Ben rushing forward and eeking by for a tough 1st down, or JB plowing through a team from 3 yards out for the score. I want more of that.

by Mechem on Nov 24, 2008 6:24 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to BTSC, a blog dedicated to the SIX-time world champion Steelers.

"Thoughtful discussion with a sense of history."

Art Rooney Jr.

"Level-headed thinking." Pittsburgh Post-Gazette

Start posting about the Steelers »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
What players have you most wished could have been Steelers?
2196876391_dcb0380cb0_small
Okay. We need some fun!
Me_small
The BTSC Predict the Score Competition, Wk 11 @ KC Chiefs
J_page_small
Talk Chiefs with AP
Miketomlin-200_small
A look to 2005 and back to the present

Recent FanPosts

Markstadiumoutside_small
Steelers to Lose Super Bowls
Small
Assistance Needed
Small
2010 NFL Mock Draft : Updated 11/20
Markstadiumoutside_small
Stephen Logan needs to go
Franco72_small
Keisel The Diesel
Scr_logo_v5_small
STEEL CURTAIN RADIO #47: ARE THE CHIEFS SLUMP BUSTERS?
Small
Steelers vs. Cowboys
Sidney_steelers_small
Gatewood added to practice squad

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Latest NFL Headlines from SB Nation

SPONSORS


Site Founder & Editor

Mbean_small Blitzburgh

Steelers Historian

Steeler_small maryrose

Bringing You Your Daily Six Pack

Plainview_small drinkyourmilkshake