I Said It: Pittsburgh Steelers Are Team To Beat In AFC
This is perhaps a touch brazen considering we've got the resurgent Dallas Cowboys coming to town. But I think I'm already convinced. The Pittsburgh Steelers are the team to beat in the 2008 version of the American Football Conference. I actually think the NFC is the tougher conference this year, but that's a topic for another day. But in the AFC, I don't see a team that we shouldn't beat come playoff time.
Why?
It pretty much comes down to this to me. In a year where there are no dominant teams, the question for me becomes then: 'which team does their best thing BETTER than other team's best thing?' In other words, which team of the AFC contenders (Tennessee, Indianapolis, New York Jets, Miami, Baltimore, Denver, New England) has the most dominant attribute. Well, I'd say that Indianapolis has the best QB, and that goes a loooong way. But their offense has been inconsistent at best, and largely disappointing more realistically. Tennessee certainly sports an impressive defense, but they went on that nice winning streak at 100% full strength injury wise. They're not nearly as deep as Pittsburgh. The other teams? Meh.
One might ask, well what differentiates Pittsburgh's defense from that of Baltimore or Tennessee? Those defenses are fantastic, no doubt. Ours is better though. Let's take a look at some of the numbers.
| Team | Pts/Game (rank) | Passing Y/G | Rushing Y/G | Total Y/G | Sacks | Turnovers Forced |
| Pittsburgh | 14.2 (1st) | 166.8 (1st) | 71.2 (1st) | 238 (1st) | 42 (1st) | 20 (t-13th) |
| Tennessee | 14.6 (2nd) | 184 (4th) | 97.2 (12th) |
281 (5th) | 34 (6th) | 25 (2nd) |
| Baltimore | 15.8 (3rd) | 175 (2nd) | 78.2 (3rd) | 253 (2nd) | 26 (9th) | 23 (t-4th) |
It's absolutely remarkable how good the defense has been. Don't get me wrong - we're still going to have to evolve and improve on offense and avoid any sort of meltdowns by our offensive line or by Big Ben. But if things keep trending like they have on offense - which is in the right direction - then I think it's reasonable to say that we're the team to beat in this conference. Now, that could look like a foolish statement come next Sunday. The Cowboys are coming to town and they sport a pretty nifty offense that's beginning to gel again now that Tony Romo has returned from injury. We'll see what happens, but regardless, they're not in the AFC. In our conference, I see fewer teams that have the offense that also have the type of defense to give us fits.
Anyway, unlike last year when the Pats simply outclassed the league for the first 19 weeks, and unlike recent years before that when the Colts offense was just that much better than everybody else's, I see no standout team. I see a bunch of teams with certain flaws and strong assets. Of those teams, I think the Steelers sport the most impressive strength in the league on either side of the ball.
And it happens to be one that is thought of as one that 'wins championships.'
I can't wait to find out if I'm correct.
Go Steelers!
Comments
Your Right
I believe after the Pats game that the Steelers were at the top of the AFC. I think that if the defense can bring more 3-and-outs out of the opponents offense and our offense can eat up clock we can beat the Titans just like the Jets did. If we steamroll over the cowboys or “cryboys” (love it when each consecutive year someone from the ‘boys cries-Romo, TO, who’s next? Hopefully Wade Phillips) we have the power to beat anybody. It’s up to our offense to win the games because as you know, each of our losses has come from offensive mistakes. I still think that the Steelers are the only team that can upset the Giants, I believe we had that game earlier with the G-Men but offensive penalties killed us.
But now I’m believeing more and agreeing with you Blitzburgh, the Steelers are now getting their full confidence back to the point where they are “scary.” The offense is improving especially the o-line and Ben is getting more comfortable in the pocket. The run is coming back to life but whats even more significant is that the flawless #1 defense we have is just getting better each game, its like a machine.
Steelers all the way, if we get Cowboys, we can easily be 13-3 or 12-4. Thanks Ryan Clark for putting the trademark steeler tackle on Welker!!!
by SteelChad88 on
Dec 1, 2008 11:18 PM EST
reply
actions
0 recs
Stat problem
Our defense is allowing 78.2 rushing yards per game, Tennessee is allowing 97.2 and your team (Steelers) is allowing 71.2
http://www.nfl.com/stats/categorystats?tabSeq=2&defensiveStatisticCategory=RUSHING&conference=ALL&role=OPP&season=2008&seasonType=REG&d-447263-s=RUSHING_YARDS_PER_GAME_AVG&d-447263-o=1&d-447263-n=1
Life is nothing but Beats & Rhymes
by Matchz Malone on
Dec 1, 2008 11:31 PM EST
reply
actions
0 recs
And the Jets are the 3rd ranked AFC Defense...
Idk where you got your stats from man
Life is nothing but Beats & Rhymes
by Matchz Malone on
Dec 1, 2008 11:32 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
please
If you think the Jets are better than the Ravens or Titans D, you’re crazy. Yards per game, maybe. Not points. I get my stats from the same place as you, brother. I happened to get one team’s lone number mixed up.
What part of 1,2,3 in terms of points per game dont u understand man?
by Blitzburgh on
Dec 1, 2008 11:33 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
i looked at the title
Statistical Comparison Of Top 3 AFC Defenses
which to me means overall.
Though I just noticed, when I said jets, I was looking at rushing… where they are 3rd… My bad
Life is nothing but Beats & Rhymes
by Matchz Malone on
Dec 1, 2008 11:35 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Jets - Fahgetaboutit
I am not worried one single small bit about the Jets – one word – FAVRE!!! He will always keep the other team in the game – always give the other guy a chance. Granted – he’s just having fun out there – but it has caught up with him. I know Kris Jenkins is a big maneater and all.. but seriously.. we all saw the NFC Championship game last year..
by smashmouthsteel on
Dec 1, 2008 11:37 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I'm worried about them
The Jets have the formula to beat us: they stop the run and get to the passer. They have holes to exploit, but we can’t exploit them. On offense, they have balance, so we won’t be able to gang up on the run or pass. If their offense can put up 14 points on us, they’d have a very good chance of beating us.
I think I’d rather play the Titans than the Jets. The Titans have mediocre run defense and a lesser passing game.
charity standing orders
by BadMaafala on
Dec 2, 2008 10:53 AM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Favre.
He id the key. With our pressure defense, he would gift wrap at least three interceptions. I’ve never understood the love for a quarterback who singlehandedly gave away more chances at Superbowls than not. If you had put Marino on the Packers teams of the late 90s, look out.
by WyoFan on
Dec 2, 2008 12:41 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
either that
or he’d burn us deep for 4 TD’s. Ben’s just as likely to do either or get sacked 8 times and do nothing productive on offense.
charity standing orders
by BadMaafala on
Dec 2, 2008 1:41 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
well
no biggie.
but id also say that yards per game isnt the best statistic because teams can give up big chunks of yards when the games out of reach.
pts per game is more telling, but that doesnt account for things like defensive scores, special teams scores. So really its all subjective who the ‘best’ are but i’ll go by points for here.
by Blitzburgh on
Dec 1, 2008 11:38 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Your Turnovers Forced looks a lil wrong too
We have 20 interceptions right now, and 8 forced fumbles… thats 28 right there.
I cant find the stat that actually says “turnovers forced” but by my logic it should be higher
Life is nothing but Beats & Rhymes
by Matchz Malone on
Dec 1, 2008 11:39 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
nope
8 forced fumbles. You only recovered 3 of them. hehe. Sorry!
by Blitzburgh on
Dec 1, 2008 11:41 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
whoops..sorry
Ill fix that. Got those two backwards. My bad!
by Blitzburgh on
Dec 1, 2008 11:32 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Also, because it makes me feel better
I’d like to state that the Ravens are number 8 overall offensively in the AFC and the Steelers are 12th
Life is nothing but Beats & Rhymes
by Matchz Malone on
Dec 1, 2008 11:37 PM EST
reply
actions
0 recs
yeah
Ravens have to be considered legit threat for the same reasons I mentioned. Their offense needs to just continue doing enough, which they have been, and then some in certain weeks. We’ll see how Flacco does down the stretch and then in the playoffs if yall are to get there
by Blitzburgh on
Dec 1, 2008 11:40 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
We have at the very least WC potential right now
But dont forget, we took you to overtime earlier in the season, and we’ve been doing nothing but getting better with the exception of a couple games (Colts & Giants).
But dont get me started on the Giants game… we lost that because of an injured Derrick Mason
Life is nothing but Beats & Rhymes
by Matchz Malone on
Dec 1, 2008 11:41 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
oh definitely
Got four tough games to close, but three are at home. Win against Washington this week would be huge. 7-3 conference record is bigtime too. Should give you the edge over some of those AFC East teams provided you get to 10 wins. 10 should be enough I think for yall.
by Blitzburgh on
Dec 1, 2008 11:43 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Hmmm, you lost a game to the giants this year because of injuries, don’t cry about that crap on a steelers board.
The ravens have been getting noticeably better. Fortunately for them every single other team has been regressing. Guess the steelers are done for in game 14.
by steelguy99 on
Dec 2, 2008 8:56 AM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I never said youd be done for
… dont be putting words in my mouth. I simply said “dont forget” and your Giants comment will be dually noted
Life is nothing but Beats & Rhymes
by Matchz Malone on
Dec 2, 2008 7:20 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
hmmmm
been doing nothing but getting better eh? Interesting…sounds like another team I know.
by TheCincinnatiConqueror on
Dec 2, 2008 10:01 AM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Jinx
I swear to god though Mr. Blitz.. if you just jinxed us.. you will be in serious serious serious trouble.. you better knock on some west coast wood right this instant mister!
by smashmouthsteel on
Dec 1, 2008 11:38 PM EST
reply
actions
0 recs
hehe
I reverse jinxed us. I blessed us, how about that?
by Blitzburgh on
Dec 1, 2008 11:39 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Still looking at random stats...
We’re also first defense wise on 3rd down percentage, and 4th down percentage, your also behind us (We’re number 1) for whatever stat 1st/G means… I’m guessing 1st downs a game..
Life is nothing but Beats & Rhymes
by Matchz Malone on
Dec 1, 2008 11:46 PM EST
reply
actions
0 recs
yea
Y’all have been awfully impressive on 3rd downs. I noticed that.
by Blitzburgh on
Dec 1, 2008 11:47 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Also if you breakdown the scoring/pts/g thing
The ravens should look a lot better. 5 came from stuff that wasnt the defenses fault
2 KR
1 INT
2 Fumble
you take that out and we look a lot better. On your side only one came from an INT return.
TDs
Steelers
Rush – Rec – KR – INT – Fum
5 10 0 1 0
Ravens
Rush – Rec – KR – INT – Fum
3 12 2 1 2
so take the extras from both teams and youve got 15 each…
Life is nothing but Beats & Rhymes
by Matchz Malone on
Dec 1, 2008 11:51 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
true
But again, we could go and look at ‘garbage time’ points and then take it a step further. The mere number of total points per game definitely doesnt tell all, and actually it wasnt until the last month that the Steelers pts per game number started to reflect how good the D has been. Cheap points to the Texans for example.
by Blitzburgh on
Dec 1, 2008 11:54 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Maybe we could look at how inconsistent your defense has been, especially when it counts? Bal vs. Giants and Bal vs. Colts come to mind…
by steelguy99 on
Dec 2, 2008 8:59 AM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
So much for the no-mores run defense
Those numbers were built up on teams that can’t run the ball. Once they get a team that has a decent offense, they go in the tank. Case in point, the Giants game. I think the Stellars held the Giants to half of what they did against the no-mores.
Must be nice to build up that winning record with a 4th place schedule.
by vin2k on
Dec 2, 2008 10:54 AM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Lets not pretend that the ravens haven’t had a tough road to row.
by steelguy99 on
Dec 2, 2008 10:59 AM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
youre looking at points that IMMEDIATELY come from offensive/ST mistakes
We’ve had numerous times where we give up shitty field position due to the asshole we used to have punting or a dumb turnover by Ben e.g. the first drive of the last game.
by TheCincinnatiConqueror on
Dec 2, 2008 10:04 AM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I'd like to note
That compared to the people on Clevelands blog. You all are really nice
Life is nothing but Beats & Rhymes
by Matchz Malone on
Dec 1, 2008 11:52 PM EST
reply
actions
0 recs
hehe
All love football. THats enough for me.
by Blitzburgh on
Dec 1, 2008 11:53 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Everything looks good compared to Cleveland
everything
by TheCincinnatiConqueror on
Dec 2, 2008 10:04 AM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
It’s easy to be nice when your team is winning.
Guns don't kill people. Lamar Woodley kills people.
by BostonWahoo on
Dec 2, 2008 12:26 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Um
You do recall Indy coming into your stadium and beating you, right? And Indy’s offense is #1 in the red zone. Calling your team the best in the AFC when you lost to the Colts at home is a bit of a stretch.
SB Nation's Indianapolis Colts blogger at Stampede Blue. Please make an account and post a diary, add some comments, and make some noise. Accounts are free, and only require an email address.
by BigBlueShoe on
Dec 2, 2008 12:01 AM EST
reply
actions
0 recs
Your team beat the ravens too
The AFC North doesnt like the Colts… its really that simple…
But this was mostly a defensive conversation… where the Colts dont hang as well
Life is nothing but Beats & Rhymes
by Matchz Malone on
Dec 2, 2008 12:04 AM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
we giftwrapped multiple turnovers
I made it very clear Indy is a force to be recokned with beacuse of Peyton alone. That doesnt mean that the game between the teams made it at all obvious that the Colts were better.
by Blitzburgh on
Dec 2, 2008 12:07 AM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
and UM...
Kansas City and Jacksonville have 6th and 7th best red zone offenses in NFL. They suck. Miami is 2nd. They’re a so-so team. So not sure what that point was trying to prove.
by Blitzburgh on
Dec 2, 2008 12:16 AM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
AND
your offense is still 22nd in scoring, 21st in total yards, 29th in rushing, 30th in Time of Possession, and 7th in passing. The silver lining is the Colts are great on 1st down and great in the redzone.
Hmm. To me, that sounds like a fairly inconsistent offense, which is what I categorized the Colts as. It just helps to have the best QB in the game, which I also said.
by Blitzburgh on
Dec 2, 2008 12:21 AM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Big deal man, the browns beat the giants, so that makes them the team to beat?
by steelguy99 on
Dec 2, 2008 9:01 AM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Um
Do You recall Ben Roethlisberger giving that interception before the half away? Santonio Holmes was clearly wide open for a 90-something yard touchdown but Ben severely underthrew him which turned into 3 points for the colts.
Or the tipped pass from Ike Taylor to Reggie Wayne that should have been an INT? 7 More points we gave you guys.
Last but not least Ben not paying attention and remembering the route and threw too early to holmes who was cutting out one last time for another INT. Another 7 points.
Now let’s add it up 7+7+7=21
Wait a second you guys only scored 24 so our offense spotted you 21 of your points and you only drove on that number defense once for a field goal. So it sounds like we beat ourselves and the Colts were just on the field at the time. You don’t have to be that good to win a game where a team gives you that many points. And the sad part for the Colts is that you still barely won. You guys won the game thats true but you didn’t beat us. Ben beat us that game.
Let’s add it up
by Bleed-Black&Gold on
Dec 2, 2008 3:22 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
health
In the NFL, it always comes down to which team has the deepest and healthiest squad to make a deep run in the playoffs. With Saturday, Brackett, and Sanders all banged up, the Colts are going to have problems. That being said, Peyton Manning is one of the all-time greats and can single handedly lead the Colts on a run.
WE DEY!!!!!
by jr3131 on
Dec 2, 2008 12:26 AM EST
reply
actions
0 recs
talk about health
I know this is a pitt blog but can we give the Ravens secondary some props… Been playing with back-ups throughout the whole season, and with the exception of the Colts game (they tend to hand it to us anyway) have been getting it done. Currently leading the NFL in INTs with CMac out and Landry out… that says something about DEPTH right there
Life is nothing but Beats & Rhymes
by Matchz Malone on
Dec 2, 2008 12:29 AM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
math_geek and I duked this out on your board awhile ago. Comparing steelers injuries to ravens injuries really doesn’t help either of us, it is pretty close to being a wash. We have both been hurt severely, and have done well.
by steelguy99 on
Dec 2, 2008 9:03 AM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
good point
Is Ivy starting for y’all? He sucked when he started against us last year. I noticed that there hasn’t been a big dropoff since McAlister gor IR’d, although you’ve hardly been playing dominant QB’s since then. Still, it’s impressive. Both teams have been missing a lot of players. Maybe we can have a pact not to injure each other in 2 weeks?
charity standing orders
by BadMaafala on
Dec 2, 2008 11:17 AM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Its Fabian & Samari starting
Ivy is back at nickle
Life is nothing but Beats & Rhymes
by Matchz Malone on
Dec 2, 2008 7:23 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
great
Fantastic. The defense has been great, but can you honestly see Joe Flacco leading the Ravens on a long playoff run? Look at the way Ben played at home during the playoffs in his rookie year. He almost blew the game against the Jets, and then fell down 24-3 to the Pats before he could even blink. If the Ravens make the playoffs, they’re probably looking at two road games, and unless the Ravens D has a 2000-esque performance, I just can’t see them winning in January.
WE DEY!!!!!
by jr3131 on
Dec 2, 2008 12:41 AM EST
reply
actions
0 recs
IDK
but i that 2000 season is looking a lot like this one, going to that wild card birth with a QB no one really cared about. I honestly think our QB is way better than the one we had our 2000 season. And though our defense isnt as good I feel we are more balanced this year.
So could I see it happening… SURE… especially if the Colts get knocked out early… and definitely if the Giants lose.
I personally think we’d beat the Titans in a round 2… and we’re getting ready to see about that Steelers rematch.
Life is nothing but Beats & Rhymes
by Matchz Malone on
Dec 2, 2008 12:58 AM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
nervous about that game
Would love another 2007 MNF like game :) We still owe yall a few more beatdowns to make up for some of the sad losses in recent years.
by Blitzburgh on
Dec 2, 2008 1:04 AM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Flacco is ten times better than Dilfer
I have to agree there.
The biggest thing that will decide the PIT-BAL game will be turn overs and field position, special teams returns may just carry the game if the +/- is equal.
"Damnit mom! You almost ran over Greg Lloyd!"
at an autograph signing back in 95. He walked out in front of our minivan, and my mom almost hit him. He apologized.
by PA ARMY OFFICER on
Dec 2, 2008 9:38 AM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
sure...Flacco's been better than Dilfer
IN THE REGULAR SEASON. Us teams used to being in the playoffs :) know that all that doesn’t matter and that the playoffs are a completely different season. There are guys like Brady, Manny Ramirez, etc. that step up come playoff time. And there are guys like the entire Chicago Cubs organization that don’t. You can’t even begin to guess how Flacco is going to handle it. I can’t, you can’t, Tony Kornhole sure as hell can’t. We’ll just have to wait and see. The way I see it, our defense is hands-down the best in the league. I don’t like to do statistical comparisons because I don’t think it tells the whole story (Americans are addicted to stats, which is why I believe they don’t like soccer as it cannot be broken down neatly into Sportscenter stats…I digress). If I WERE to hold stock in stats, I’d say the most telling is not ever letting up 300 yards in a game this year, period. Brandon Jacobs almost put up 300 on you guys. This defense is straight nasty and has put up all the numbers it has this season with piss-poor field position. I’ll take Ben over a ‘?’ in the QB-Playoff category and I’ll take the rest of our offense over yours as well (Praise be to Allah that BA just may have figured out how to use Mewelde)
by TheCincinnatiConqueror on
Dec 2, 2008 10:14 AM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Flacco has been great...BUT
his true test will come in the next few weeks as defensive coordinators begin to pile up the game tape and figure out his tendencies. I’m not saying that he cant continue to be hot, but similar to D.A. last year, defenses start figuring people out.
Its hard to gameplan early in the season with little tape on a player, but eventually every qb is exposed.
by bradyquinnsclipboard on
Dec 2, 2008 1:10 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Don't know if I buy this reasoning...
- The thing is, our defense won’t be playing against the other teams’ defenses. They will be playing against the other teams’ offenses. And vice versa. It’s all about matchups. It’s whether we can stop Tennessee’s physical ground game, NE’s spread them out philosophy, Manning’s execution, etc.
- There have been years when the team with the best offense or best defense has won the whole thing, but there have been quite a few years when they haven’t.
Look at last year, when NE clearly had the best offense in the league, and in modern Super Bowl era history if you go simply by points scored. In fact, none of the highest 4 scoring teams in the Super Bowl history (2007 Patriots, 1998 Vikings, 2000 Rams and 1983 Redskins) won the Super Bowl.
- Defense is harder to quantify. For one thing, turnovers have to be factored in. For example, how many people know that the 1986 Bears actually allowed fewer points (187) than the 1985 edition (198). But that 1985 defense is remembered as their best because they simply pillaged opposing teams with sacks (54) and turnovers (64). Secondly, it matters what type of offense is complementing that defense. If you are always playing defense from ahead, or have an offense that can control the clock, it makes a difference.
Anyway, there have been many years when our defense was arguably the best in the league and we didn’t win the whole thing. 1976, 1994, 2001 and 2004 come to mind. In each of those years, something else proved to be our downfall. In 1976, it was injuries to our rb (that could happen again this year). In 1994, it was our offense’s inability to score when in the red zone (another problem we’ve had this year). In 2001, it was poor special teams play (thankfully our coverage units have been pretty good this year). In 2004, it was a rookie qb.
Our defense this year is special, no question. But it lacks in the turnover department. Last week was great. And we saw how turnovers created just make the game so much easier to win. And even after last week’s 5 turnovers, we are still only 13th in the league in that category.
Interestingly enough, the last two times we made the Super Bowl were in 1995 and 2005. Yet our 1994 and 2004 defenses were better units.
- One thing that I do think we have working in our favor this year is this: our schedule. It’s hard to do a statistical study about this, but I’ve often wondered if our postseason success could be tied to our schedule during the regular season.
For example, in the 1970s, the AFC was clearly the dominant conference. So it’s logical that if you can beat the Raiders, and later on the Oilers, that you should rack up the Lombardi’s.
Conversely, under Cowher, we often played in a division filled with patsies. And the AFC was weak in general for much of that time. So, it doesn’t surprise me that the Steelers often underachieved in the postseason.
This year, our schedule has been tough. By the time the postseason comes around, this team will have played so many games against tough teams: the Eagles, Ravens, Jaguars, Giants, Redskins, Colts, Chargers, Patriots, Cowboys, Ravens and Titans. They should be hardened. There should be nothing that they haven’t seen. They are 5-3 against those teams so far. If they can end up 7-4 or better against them and get to the playoffs relatively healthy, I’ll like our chances of at least getting to Tampa. If they drop 2 of the next 3, I expect another team to represent the AFC.
by steeler1275 on
Dec 2, 2008 12:49 AM EST
reply
actions
0 recs
good points
To try to clarify – I wasnt trying to ‘pit’ our defenses against others and say ‘thats enough, we win!’. I was trying to say (didnt do great job) that we have the most standout asset of any team. Sure the Pats lost last year in the SB, but it took a miracle and it was after the SB. The blitzed the league till they got there.
I think this year is a lot like 2000 and 2002 when the Ravens and Bucs won.
Interesting thoughts about tough schedule paying dividends down the line. Not sure the answer. Definitely evidence for and against, but I think the NYG last year are a great example of what you’re talking about. Battle tested all year in the NFC East plus they played NE once in regular season.
by Blitzburgh on
Dec 2, 2008 12:52 AM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Well...
It may have seemed like a miracle at the time, but the Giants have clearly proved that they were not a fluke last year with their subsequent play this year, even minus Strahan and Osi.
And for me, it’s all about the Lombardi. So, I could care less that the Patriots blitzed the league on the way to Glendale last year. They still lost. So, for me it boils down to whether the Steelers have a legitimate chance to win it all, or not. Last year, I thought that they didn’t have a realistic shot heading into the playoffs. The run defense was sufferring without Aaron Smith, the coverage units were horrible, the schedule was relatively easy, and the Steelers had lost against almost every good team they faced (Jax, NE, only beat Seattle at home).
This year the schedule is much more difficult, they’ve beaten the teams they were supposed to beat (no losses to teams like the Jets this year) and they’ve beaten their fair share of good teams.
by steeler1275 on
Dec 2, 2008 1:10 AM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
great insight,
not only have they beaten the good teams, but they (roethlisberger) gave away the Giants and Colts games. that’s no excuse, because a loss is a loss, and the whole team loses, not just one player…but we very realistically could be 11-1 right now, as we SHOULD have won both those games. it appears that ben is starting to play more consistently with quicker and better reads. that will be the determining factor.
by NoCal-SteelCity on
Dec 2, 2008 11:47 AM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
and one more thing
I see no way that Tennessee will be able to run against us. NOBODY has been able to, B Jacobs and the Giants included. Titans will have to take to the air and play lights out on defense cuz I think we’ll keep them under 120 yards on the ground for the game. At worst.
by Blitzburgh on
Dec 2, 2008 1:05 AM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
yep.
i love the steelers chances if they force Collins to throw all day. I’m worried about the Titans pass rush.
by bradyquinnsclipboard on
Dec 2, 2008 1:12 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
By the way, I don't mean to sound like a Debbie Downer
I am enjoying the ride so far. The team is better than last year’s version and is in general making strides under Tomlin. And I do think that the Steelers have as good a chance as anybody in the AFC, and probably are only 2nd to the Giants in the NFL.
That said, I still will be monitoring the following (you’ll notice that most of these have to do with the offensive side of the ball):
- the health of our running backs (and injuries in general)
- our ability to convert on 3rd/4th and 1 with Russell
- the offensive line
- the red zone offense
- the wr (Hines is older and needs help; it would be nice if we could count on Holmes and Washington for more consistency; also remember that we really haven’t faced too many good secondaries to date, the Eagles probably were the best group of def backs we’ve faced this season)
- how we fare against Dal, Ten and Balt
With regards to the Cowboy game, I am interested to see how our offense fares against their defense. I have a pretty good idea of what our defense is capable of. But will Starks be able to block Ware? Will we be able to protect Ben in general? (While we have 42 sacks this year, how many of you know that the Cowboys have 39?) Will they shadow Holmes with Newman, and if so, will Holmes be able to get open with any consistency? Will Hine and Nate be able to shake Henry, Scandrick and Jenkins? (Delthea O’neal won’t be there to kick around this week.)
by steeler1275 on
Dec 2, 2008 1:46 AM EST
reply
actions
0 recs
absolutely
This is the heat-check stretch. We need to come out atleast 2-1 over these next 3 to keep me convinced. 3-0 and I’m bettin the house on Super Bowl.
by TheCincinnatiConqueror on
Dec 2, 2008 10:19 AM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
“But will Starks be able to block Ware?”
Yikes. Maybe the better question would be, “Will Starks plus Miller/Spaeth or Moore/FWP/Davis be able to block Ware?” Should we just keep Trai Essex in as a TE to block him on passing plays?
charity standing orders
by BadMaafala on
Dec 2, 2008 11:23 AM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
the good news
Our O-line gets beat on one-on-one matchups sometimes, but for the most part the problem stems from complicated blitzes and stunts. They’re terrible at picking these up. (Paging Coach Z). Thus the Eagles kick the hell out of us. So we should be able to handle Ware with some help on Starks’ side.
by Chicago Steeler on
Dec 2, 2008 12:27 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Ware
is a concern, but I think he is the type of pressure Ben can handle. We know Ben does well rolling out of the pocket to his right, which would be away from the direction Ware is coming. If Willie holds up on the other side, Ben might be moving that way a lot.
Plus, I don’t think Dallas does a great job of hiding their blitzes, which has killed us in the past. Remember the Eagles were sacking us with three and four man rushes because they would put eight men on the line and the o line couldn’t figure out who to block when half the guys dropped into coverage. Dallas’s secondary and linebackers are too slow to do anything similar: if safeties and linebackers are lining up near scrimmage there is no way they’ll be able to drop back into coverage. Point being, Ware is a great player for whom the Steelers must account, but I don’t think the matchup is not as bad for the Steelers as it may appear. Oh, by the way, he might be slowed by an injury too. HA!
by CarlWeathersMustache on
Dec 2, 2008 1:06 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Hey fellas, Dallas fan here
Just here to talk a little football. You’re half right about Dallas blitzes. Throughout the beginning of the year, they were horrible at disguising the blitz, but in the last 3-4 weeks, they’ve been much, much better. Evidence of this is that Bradie James has 5 sacks this year, whereas he had 5 sacks combined in his previous 5 years in the league. Greg Ellis also has 2 games in a row with a sack, and Ratliff has been getting great push up the middle from the nose(6 sacks)
"When it's third and ten, you can take the milk drinkers and I'll take the whiskey drinkers every time." -Max McGee
by BigDinSC on
Dec 2, 2008 1:11 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
also should note that you have played the seahawks, forty-niners, and redskins the past 3 weeks in your victories.
barely won against washington and the other two teams, you guys are suppose to dominate. There is a big difference between our O-line as of late and I really don’t see more than 2-3 sacks on Big Ben if you guys get that.
by Bleed-Black&Gold on
Dec 2, 2008 3:29 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Since we have been dropping alot of stats...
Cowboys are second in the NFL behind the Steelers in sacks with 40. Demarcus Ware has 15.0, he is leading the entire league. He has one more sack than Silverback does. (Weird to think that anyone can be as effective as a pass rusher as Harrison has been..
I believe the Steelers are at 42 or 43 sacks for the season thus far, I can’t remember..but my point is this will be a good test for the O-line to see if we really are improving as a unit. If we fail miserably then at least we have a few more weeks to work out the kinks before the playoffs.
by iBleedBlack&Gold on
Dec 2, 2008 4:05 AM EST
reply
actions
0 recs
Ware
would seem to be attacking the QB more times as a D-lineman in a 4-3 than Debo would (correct me if I’m wrong, I’m going purely off of guess/rationality). I don’t think there’s anything nastier than Harrison in the league right now as far as an outside pass-rush goes. He’s like Michael Phelps in that he’s built for that position. Short and strong as shit, uses that leverage to his advantage.
by TheCincinnatiConqueror on
Dec 2, 2008 10:21 AM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I wonder if he can still max bench 475…Sure looks like it.
by steelguy99 on
Dec 2, 2008 10:27 AM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Ware
Ware is an OLB just like Harrison. Both of them rush the passer more than drop into coverage. Ware is a better speed rusher, Harrison has a better bull rush. Harrison’s bull rush also makes him more of a force against the run, while Ware is probably a little better in coverage, although both are capable against the run and pass. Harrison leads the uncalled holding penalty category, of course. Both are excellent players who aren’t having flukey years by any stretch and deserve pretty serious DPOY consideration.
charity standing orders
by BadMaafala on
Dec 2, 2008 11:04 AM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
more reasons to keep the ball on the ground
to slow down the pass rush. i think the steelers should run the ball to ware’s side and make him think twice about pinning his ears back and rushing benjamin.
by bradyquinnsclipboard on
Dec 2, 2008 1:16 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Not you're best plan
That would be like us Dallas fans deciding that we should just run at Harrison to neutralize him. Ware plays the run very well.
"When it's third and ten, you can take the milk drinkers and I'll take the whiskey drinkers every time." -Max McGee
by BigDinSC on
Dec 2, 2008 1:28 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
either way
i love the steelers chances if they can get to the second level of the cowboys’ defense. I’ll take Zack Thomas vs. Willie/Moore anytime. I also think that Heath Miller and Matt Spaeth are mismatches against the cowboys linebackers.
by bradyquinnsclipboard on
Dec 2, 2008 2:54 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
The two aren’t comparable. Harrison has a phenomenal bull rush and speed off the edge, doesn’t ware predominately rely on speed? A rusher coming in to go around the tackle is very susceptible to being run on, a rusher coming in bull rushing is in a much better place to make the tackle.
by steelguy99 on
Dec 2, 2008 2:56 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
not so sure...
not so sure harrison has the better bull rush… i have consistently seen ware bull rush ginormous lt’s and drive them right back into their qb… and then the next play he’ll put a move on the same guy, where he stutters then just blows past… simply amazing to watch how he sets up left tackles… not saying harrison doesn’t have a good bull rush (honestly i haven’t watched him that much besides highlights…)… they are both godly to our teams
by CowboysFan4Life on
Dec 2, 2008 4:29 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Harrison's isn't really a bull rush
If you guys are seeing what I’m seeing then Harrison uses a quasi bull rush. It is super effective and I think it is why he is held all the time and it’s never called. He does this amazing move where he starts the edge rush, gets the tackle turned, and then sort of bull rushes into the left tackle with one shoulder while the tackle is turned toward the sideline or almost turned the opposite direction he started.
This move amazes me…it allows Harrison to get the tackle in a position where he is not necessarily between Harrison and the QB yet it is not a speed rush move where Harrison has to take the long way and go around the tackle. The other upshot is tackles end up holding Harrison (although it is never called) because they are trying to block a bull rush but they are to the side of Harrison. Has anyone else seen this or am I missing something?
by CarlWeathersMustache on
Dec 2, 2008 7:55 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
You're right
Maybe we should wait and see how the Dallas game goes before we anoint the Steelers. With their pass rush, this could (but hopefully won’t) be a Philly type offensive debacle. If Ware is out, I think this game is in the bag.
by CarlWeathersMustache on
Dec 2, 2008 9:01 AM EST
reply
actions
0 recs
I have been trying to say this for weeks
After about week five I sensed the potential for greatness in our season that I imagined at the beginning of they season. We were playing lights out defense despite our Offense always putting us in terrible situations. Most of the blame was on Big Ben, for he was throwing waaay too many interceptions which could be due to his injuries. Our O-line wasn’t that good but better than ESPN credited them. Now that they have more experience with the zone blocking system and Big Ben is making better decisions with better playcalling by BA, everyone thinks they are so much better.
But the fact is that they have gotten better but not in the sense that I feel ESPN thinks. The defense has been dominate of course but the biggest difference is Ben Roethlisberger and the fact that we are healing up. We have always been this good but it didnt show on the field because of the amount of injuries and poor play of our QB. Ben is playing better and so are the Steelers.
We have a great oppurtunity to win this SB as mentioned above, there are no dominate teams in the NFL this league and the door is wide open. The difference is that the league is more balanced with injuries and transactions and the teams who do not make mistakes and play defense are the successful ones. Why are the former laughing stock of the NFL, Miami Dolphins 7-5? Because they only have 10 turnovers in 12 games. NYG and TEN are right up there in that stat also. These teams are not technically better or more talented but are just playing smarter. I really do not see any time beating us if we do not commit excessive turnovers.
We have more talent than the Giants and should be able to beat them and anyone else if we meet again. Look at the previous game we played. We committed 5 turnover essentially (safety+4ints) with the giants committing none and only lost by 7. We did not have the help of a long snapper, F-dub, and Holmes and still managed to only lose by a touchdown. We had a pretty bad game and it took all five of those turnoves which 4 set up the Giants for points and 1 actually gave them points. In a rematch I do not see Ben throwing those 2 errant throws, I do not see Nate Washington dropping a pass that leads to an interception, I do not see James Harrison oversnapping and leading to a safety, and i don’t believe we will have to heave a game winning hail mary that is turned into an interception. Luck was on the giants side last time and in a rematch we will prevail.
by Bleed-Black&Gold on
Dec 2, 2008 10:30 AM EST
reply
actions
0 recs
I would also like to add that we gave the giants +5 turnover margin and lost by 7 while we have a
+4 turnover margin over the pats and won by 23.
by Bleed-Black&Gold on
Dec 2, 2008 11:49 AM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Agree on most except one thing....
I DO or can see Nate dropping another ball that leads to an INT. He has made great strides the season, but is still very inconsistent game to game.
by Jonny B. on
Dec 2, 2008 10:42 AM EST
reply
actions
0 recs
True But Nate won't be starting
Nate Washington was getting so much action because Holmes was deactivated for that game remember. It would be more likely holmes on that play rather than washington. When we use Nate sparingly or as the #3 receiver then he will be less defended and have better chances and more room of making the catch as not as much attention willbe paid to him.
by Bleed-Black&Gold on
Dec 2, 2008 11:04 AM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I hope you aren’t making the case that if the ball is thrown to santonio an interception is less likely.
by steelguy99 on
Dec 2, 2008 11:06 AM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
lol
maybe Nate should cut off a few more routes to be like tonio
charity standing orders
by BadMaafala on
Dec 2, 2008 11:18 AM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
no not really but holmes doesn’t drop as many passes and holds on to the ball as evident when he was crushed in the Bengals game.
I am just saying that there is less chance for Nate to drop a ball when Santonio is playing
by Bleed-Black&Gold on
Dec 2, 2008 11:46 AM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
My take on this
Just like I didn’t want to get too down on our team for our losses to the Eagles, Giants, and Colts, I’m not ready to crown this team, or even say we’re the team to beat in the AFC. For one thing, after ‘94 and ’95, I’ve given up expecting the Steelers to play as well as they are capable of in championships. While I’m thankful that we’ve had great teams over the last 16-17 years, I’m not ready to think too highly of any team until they actually get that ring. That said, this is a great, great defense, and they’ve been able to accomplish great things so far this year. I have also said that this team reminds me in some ways of the ‘74 Steelers team. If we just don’t screw up on offense, our defense has proven good enough to hold most teams under 14 points. The only problem is that we’ve proven more than capable of screwing up on offense.
by WolfpackSteelersFan on
Dec 2, 2008 2:17 PM EST
reply
actions
0 recs
Let's not forget about
’97, 01, and 04—ALL reasons to be cautiously optimistic, less we have our hearts ripped out again.
by Jonny B. on
Dec 3, 2008 1:05 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
True
But, I’ve never expected them to win SBs since ’95. I was just thankful to get one in my adult life (I was 6 for the 4th SB).
by WolfpackSteelersFan on
Dec 3, 2008 1:25 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
The Team To Beat
is the same shaky title granted to the Jets last week … the sword of Damocles … if Pittsburgh wins its next 2, or 2 of their next 3, I’ll gladly give them that title. Though they are (as I’d half-hoped/half-predicted about 3 weeks ago) peaking and getting cohesive at the right time.
Actually it all began around the time Ben returned to practice.
As far as the Harrison vs. Ware discussion … each one matches his team’s style perfectly, so they both have ample opportunity to knock QBs around. What I prefer about Harrison’s style is his mutability. Throughout the first half at New England he ran a direct bull-rush style, over and over again. He had no sacks, but applied constant pressure, and then in the second half he switched it up to a speed style, going around the outside, and beat his man on just about every snap. It was beautiful, cerebral, and unstoppable. He used his opponent’s blocking ability and muscle memory against him, setting up a dominant second half. Defensive player of the year, without question.
My only concern is Romo; dude’s a talented scrambler … like a healthy Ben, thrives on avoiding a rush and rolling bootlegs outside the pocket. If the D-line can contain him within a pocket, or force him to run only to his left, the LBs oughtta have a good afternoon. if they just chase him and let him bootleg out, he’ll find someone for a big play downfield almost every time.
by Fahey on
Dec 2, 2008 2:53 PM EST
reply
actions
0 recs
True
but just like Ben, Romo has been known to give a couple freebies to the other team.
by CarlWeathersMustache on
Dec 2, 2008 4:06 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
true
i agree with you wolfpacksteelers fan and fahey
first of all i am a state fan also
but yeah the offense showed it can do horrible but you have to be at least optimistic because it hasn’t really been the entire offense. The part that had been losing games for us is Big Ben and now that he is healthy and practicing I really doubt he will have anymore 3-5 INT games, that has gotta be out of the question especially with f-dub back. So thats why i have confidence in this years team to win a SB.
Fahey, I don’t want to be the team to beat because usually a team will rise up just to beat you. But I honestly think we are the best team in the league. If we aren’t then we have the tools, coaches, and players to be, or potential is great. The Giants are a great team but their D is not as suffocating and we can totally shut them down as long as we do not give them the ball in great field position like last time.
But about Tony Homo, he can be dangerous bootlegging but i think he is also a liability when he does. I have seen numerous times when he is trying to roll out and make a play but all it does is give the defense more time to get to him or he ends up throwing an INT or making a big play. Against our defense, we are too fast to let him run around in the pocket and make a play so expect some fumble from him or sacks if he tries to do that against us.
He is hit or miss but look back at their game vs. Philly and Arizona. Those come to mind immediately, he has made huge errors in those games while trying to roll out and make a play.
by Bleed-Black&Gold on
Dec 2, 2008 3:37 PM EST
reply
actions
0 recs
just like...
last week when romo rolls out and hits a deep strike to owens? against a pro bowl cb in trufant? good luck with that…
by CowboysFan4Life on
Dec 2, 2008 4:34 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
You’re right, we’re totally screwed.
I have to say, I am impressed with Romo’s ungodly play against the seahawks. Want to know what the steelers pass D and the seahawks pass D have in common? They both are bookends to the rest of the NFL.
by steelguy99 on
Dec 2, 2008 4:52 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
the difference is...
def the pass rush… although i do fear the pass rush, i wouldn’t half as much if it wasn’t supposed to snow and be so cold… i feel like this is going to make it a running game, and although i do like the cowboys line (a lot when they play like they are capable), im not so sure we’ll be able to run (a. no one has run on the steelers b. barber is banged up)
by CowboysFan4Life on
Dec 2, 2008 5:40 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Our pass rush gets a lot of credit, deservedly so.
No one realizes that are backs have played very, very well this year though. There are quite a few coverage sacks thrown in the total. The steelers defense #1 across the board even though we’ve had injuries to DLs, CBs, and LBs because the unit as a whole is solid. If there were a weakness, don’t you think it would have been exploited by now?
by steelguy99 on
Dec 2, 2008 5:49 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
in all fairness...
what offense was supposed to exploit you? the only good/decent offenses you have faced are indy, nyg, bal…. and they all beat you… and not one of those teams is as explosive as the cowboys o (in good weather)… giants o is very solid and indy is solid although not up to par… interested in seeing what will happen
by CowboysFan4Life on
Dec 2, 2008 7:01 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Incorrect
Baltimore did not beat us. You have a point that we lost to Indy and NY, but it certainly wasn’t because of offensive dominance. Peyton moved the ball decently but we absolutely stymied NY’s offense: NY had the ball for over 34 minutes and only amassed 280 yds of offense. Furthermore, NY only scored one TD (and 19 total points) despite starting drives at the Pittsburgh 19, 29, 37, 42, and then drives from their own 49 and 47. Conceivably the Giants could have gotten 12 points without moving a yard on offense and would have been in FG range on two more drives with one first down (I know 59 yards is a long FG but it’s possible and this is for purely illustrative purposes).
So even if you maintain that the Dallas offense (with an injured Barber) is as good as NY’s, you guys are not in for a good day, even if you start four drives in FG range (which may not be safe to assume) and don’t turn the ball over once.
by CarlWeathersMustache on
Dec 2, 2008 8:09 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
In addition
There was very little about Indy’s oefense that was impressive that day. If we don’t hand them the ball TWICE at our 30 and if our corner would put his thumbs together when defending a pass, Indy’s offense would have scored the same three it scored upon that powerful Browns offense Sunday. I know, I know…if ifs and buts were candy and nuts…..but my point is, the Indy offense scored on two very short fields and on a tipped pass, not very impressive at all
Thoughtful discussion with a sense of history
by maryrose on
Dec 2, 2008 10:07 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
LOL really now?
okay you can think that is something but i give them no credit for that. I don’t care if he was a pro bowler shoot Derrick Anderson was a pro bowler before but that means nothing for this season
The fact is that the Seahawks SUCK! They are in the worst division in football and are 2-10!!!
And you are taking pride in beating one of the worst teams in the league?? LoL you are now going against the number one defense in the league, last week was the 30th ranked defense.
by Bleed-Black&Gold on
Dec 2, 2008 5:50 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
uh, im just pointing out
that romo avoids pressure and throws the ball downfield… for good gains and backbreaking plays… and yes, i take pride in romo…
now your taking pride in a steelers team that has 3 legit teams on their schedule, all of which they lost to
by CowboysFan4Life on
Dec 2, 2008 7:04 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
not to mention he rolled out and had like 3 minutes to throw the ball, there was no pressure on him at all. when he has pressure (redskins, eagles) he made mistakes. If you still don’t think so then maybe he won’t look like as much of a God to you cowboy fans when he gets smacked around Sunday.
by Bleed-Black&Gold on
Dec 2, 2008 5:51 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Another State Fan
Cool to have another State Fan on the board. How about that season turn-around. :) :)
I don’t want to seem too pessimistic. Like I said, this team does remind me a lot of the ‘74 team, with wins like that 11-10 win over the Chargers. I could see us winning another SB, but it’s just so hard to win a championship in the NFL these days. The talent disparity is just not what it once was. If it was, I don’t think a 6 seed could ever win one, like in 2005.
As has been stated on here, we seem to peaking at the right time. Our D just destroyed a QB who became the first Pats* QB ever to post consecutive 400 yard passing games. I hope we see a repeat on Romo. But, I’m always more nervous about the next opponent than most people, so we’ll see what happens.
by WolfpackSteelersFan on
Dec 2, 2008 5:49 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
yeah that unc win was the best though but back to pittsburgh
its okay to be nervous, my dad is like that too, who has been a fan since the 70’s. I have been watching the steelers since 1995 when they lost in the Super bowl and i was only 5 but i remember the whole game (still hate Dallas since that day, and O’Donnell). But i am just hoping to give you something to have confidence in.
by Bleed-Black&Gold on
Dec 2, 2008 6:02 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I hear ya
True, the UNC win was awesome! Unfortunately it wasn’t on in my area. Had to watch the highlights on The Tom O’Brien Show.
As far as my nervousness, that’s just how I am. The last time I was really confident before a game was the ‘94 loss to the Chargers in the AFCC. I was just glad to see the Cowgirls turn it over 3 times in the first quarter to the 49ers. Otherwise, that would have been the worst sports day of my life. But, I guess you 4 for that one, so you wouldn’t remember it. Anyway, you’re right, though, I should be more confident, especially with the amazing consistency of this defense.
by WolfpackSteelersFan on
Dec 2, 2008 6:34 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Character
Thanks for coming over CowboysFan4Life, we always enjoy a lively debate. (P.S. Don’t take the use of the “Cowgirls” too seriously, it is all in fun.)
In this debate about the Steelers and the Cowgirls, I believe we must talk about character. With injuries at every turn, the Steelers have shown huge character. It seems that they refuse to quit. Now the Cowgirls on the other hand: they seem to quit unless they are sticking it to the other team. I think they will fold when presented serious adversity from our defense early on. We all know T.O.’s attitude can go south even when they are winning. And we all know she is not getting the ball very often against us.
In the long run, the Cowgirls don’t have the character to win a 60 minute, knock down, drag out fight. Period! Lots of talent, short on character.
A lot of compairisons between Ware and Harrison. There is one thing that Ware doesn’t have: Woodley on the other side. That is the tie breaker. Game, set, and match – Harrison.
GO STEELERS!
by WyoFan on
Dec 2, 2008 5:46 PM EST
reply
actions
0 recs
yeah not to mention he doesn’t have Roy Williams either when Harrison has Troy Polamalu not to mention the number one defense too.
by Bleed-Black&Gold on
Dec 2, 2008 5:53 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Haha come on now
You’re insulting your own team by comparing Roy Williams to Troy Polamalu. Williams is a liability, Troy’s a playmaker. Also, while we don’t have anyone near the caliber of Woodley on the other side, Anthony Spencer and Greg Ellis are both very good pass rushers who can make a team pay for giving too much attention to Ware.
"When it's third and ten, you can take the milk drinkers and I'll take the whiskey drinkers every time." -Max McGee
by BigDinSC on
Dec 2, 2008 6:03 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Dallas Pass Rush
i will like to point out that 25% of DAL sacks on the year have come in the last two weeks against two of the worst teams in the league.
Not to mention the level of difficulty of our schedule is alot higher than Dallas and we have played against a lot of good defenses in the league that are better than Dallas (BAL, NYG, WSH, PHI)
so yeah they can pass rush a little bit but its not like we haven’t seen better before.
by Bleed-Black&Gold on
Dec 2, 2008 6:15 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Don’t point out that two of those defenses we lost to.
by steelguy99 on
Dec 2, 2008 6:35 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
why not, you learn from your mistakes. and this D is not NYG or PHI. And Big Ben is playing at a much higher level than those games. Just because we lost does not mean that it is solely their defense for the victory. You know there are other variables that lead to us losing that Giants game.
For the Philadelphia game i just think our gameplan was not very good for that game, not to mention we had just started using the zone blocking scheme. The Philly game is harder to defend but just realize that we have played against better defenses since and had better results so the coordinators did learn from that game.
by Bleed-Black&Gold on
Dec 2, 2008 6:40 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
You seem to think the steelers are invincible, I just don’t agree.
by steelguy99 on
Dec 2, 2008 7:00 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
You too BigDinSC
Glad to see you too BigDinSC. Love your quote.
by WyoFan on
Dec 2, 2008 6:28 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
haha thanks
As a whiskey drinker myself, I like any quote that justifies my lifestyle.
"When it's third and ten, you can take the milk drinkers and I'll take the whiskey drinkers every time." -Max McGee
by BigDinSC on
Dec 2, 2008 6:55 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
My Bad
I meant to go back and say that Troy is way better and is no comparison even if he was on the field but i have been going back and forth responding to comments and among other things made me forget.
by Bleed-Black&Gold on
Dec 2, 2008 6:08 PM EST
reply
actions
0 recs
Cowboys.....
the team America loves to hate when not hating the Patriots! Welcome back to the ’burgh! By the time JJ adds Plaxico for next season, your work release all star team will be truly formidable. Hopefully Tank Johnson will be able to teach Plax a little bit about gun safety.
As for the game this week, I think the Steelers D can contain anyone at this point. While other posters have discussed our highly ranked defenses of past years, I can honestly say that in many of those years I never felt the overall confidence in the unit that this unit has now earned. They are truly great in a statistical sense, while carrying a fear factor for opponents that few defenses have ever acquired. Romo has shown a knack of lighting up crappy D’s, while struggling against better ones, especially in crunch time. With this essentially figuring to be a playoff game for the ’girls, he will be feeling pressure beyond that applied by silverback and Woodley, which I believe will lead to poor decisions and turnovers. He has not yet proven to be a reliable performer when the chips are down. See the last two years playoff performances as proof.
On offense, Ben and the lads seem to be finding their stride. After watching the condensed version of the Pats game for the third time, it was an amazing performance by our line, especially considering where they started the year. Every member of the line had plays where they made blocks that they seemingly have not been able to execute previously. The Stapler and Colon were amazing, and Kemo was a road grader most of the day. Hartwig was solid, and called protections almost perfectly. Big Max was not clearly beaten by Seymour, which is the best outcome we could have realistically hoped for. Heath and Mewelde were awesome in every way. Mewelde had two huge blitz pick ups that led to long completions to Heath. It seemed as if they were taking turns helping the line chip on rushers. Hopefully we can mix up our schemes so Ware will not be able to predict where help will be coming from. Max will need to try to steer him past the pocket, and let Ben step up to throw, much like last week’s plan against Seymour. Hopefully their confidence in themselves is growing, as I am sure the early struggles had to eat at a proud group of men.
It seems like we are jelling at the right time, much like 2006. The schedule has indeed been brutal, which I believe could be a positive in that we will not likely face a Super Bowl contending team that we will not have played before, or is better than the teams we have faced. I expect at least a 3-1 finish, which would be enough to win the division and get a bye, a huge plus healthwise. Whomever we would face in the playoffs would have to be not overjoyed at their draw, as I don’t know where you begin when game-planning for this defense, especially in potentially poor weather/field conditions. I fear Indy the most, but we may not have to face them until the AFC championship if we end up the two seed, as we would likely get Denver/AFC East winner, assuming one of them could beat BAL/other East team in a home game. Not a given of course, but they would likely be favored. I would take my chances against the lot of them, followed by a rematch with Indy/Ten for the AFC title. With the Cowboys the only team with enough firepower to possibly knock out the Giants, if we could survive the AFC title game, we would likely face another rematch. Please let it be so!
"Steeler Nation= We are better than you!"
by il_steeler_fan on
Dec 4, 2008 4:14 PM EST
reply
actions
0 recs











