Steelers Now Ranked Number One in the ESPN Power Rankings
As a complement to Blitz's Sports Illustrated piece, the Steelers are now firmly entrenched as the Number One team in the NFL:
http://myespn.go.com/blogs/nfcwest/0-6-179/Power-rankings--How-the-voters-voted.html
We need to proceed, however, as Mike Tomlin heeds cautiously. I hope these last five wins give the team confidence but not false ego. We still can't block very well and if we lose from here on out, that will be the culprit.
It's great to be a little giddy this week, but we must temper it with NFL reality.
0 recs |
15 comments
Comments
Yahoo’s Michael Silver, Sporting New’s Vinney Iyer also have us ranked number 1.
http://www.sportingnews.com/yourturn/viewtopic.php?t=497523
http://sports.yahoo.com/nfl/news;_ylt=ArXCNps3hMMXfo0J.yXj1Ec5nYcB?slug=ms-32questions121608&prov=yhoo&type=lgns
I'll drink your Milkshake, I'll drink it up!
by drinkyourmilkshake on Dec 16, 2008 3:20 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
True.
The Colts offense remains dangerous against even the Steeler’s defense, while Dwight Freeney and Bob Sanders can hurt Big Ben. The Ravens are madder than ever and will not make the mistakes (e.g., giving up on the run) or suffer the bad breaks (e.g., the replay reveral, losing CB Washington for that final decisive drive) which they did on Sunday. And we’ve no idea how the Steelers stack up against the Titans yet. All of this is to say that Sunday best be buried in the past before any complacency or ESPN hype distracts this team from serious weaknesses (e.g., O-line, erratic or unproductive QB play, slowing sack stats and chinks in the run defense armor). Pittsburgh’s glorious Super Bowl history makes the team more likely than most other franchises to suffer a let-down in the big playoff games, as Cowher’s horrible AFC Championship record attests. Hopefully, Tomlin’s staff will be different (and I am hopeful they will be), but this team and coaching staff definitely have much to prove yet. I hope they ignore the media until at least the second week of February.
by ec on Dec 16, 2008 3:21 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
colts only scored when we patty caked them the ball and when we gave them extremely short field.
by Bleed-Black&Gold on Dec 17, 2008 12:00 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
i said to a friend earlier
That I don’t think the offense can feel too good about itself. They know they have still been very pedestrian during this win streak. Maybe this attention + the late drives jumpstarts them a bit. Eve if not, I don’t think theres anyway for the guys on offense to trick themselves into thinking they’re playing great football.
by Blitzburgh on Dec 16, 2008 3:24 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Lets hope
that you are right. The only thing that you can say about this offense is they sure are resilient.
Watching Big Ben in the post game I am struck by how confident the guy is. And he should be. There are a lot of critics, sitting by their laptops finding fault with the way that number 7 plays the game. And here he is against the second best defense in the league, struggling through some killer drops by his receivers, a couple of blown protections by his line/backs and still finding a way to go 92 for game winning score. He ain’t pretty. He doesn’t date supermodels. He’s not particularly graceful.
But the guy has heart and finds a way to win.
The same can be said about the offense he runs.
by SteelerBuddha on Dec 16, 2008 3:31 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
+1
Definitely up till the last line :)
The offense is not as good as Ben is though in my humble opinion :/
by Blitzburgh on Dec 16, 2008 3:47 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
+1 cept for the girls
He may not Date super models, but the girls he’s been hitting up were pretty damn hot. I posted in a thread and had pics to several. One of which was removed :(
by Mechem on Dec 16, 2008 5:30 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
i disagree
i think the offense is coming along nicely. They have been steadily improving as they are picking up blitzes WAY better than earlier in the year and Ben has plenty of time to throw it usually, of course there are times when they just blitz way too many for 5 to block and there are times when there is just great D, still the o-line played incredible in my opinion last game especially going against the D that they went against.
Our offense was on the verge of putting together a good drive multiple times but there was something always breaking up the drive, phantom holding calls, dropped passes, bad fumbles, or bad play calling. The ravens did stop us a few times but i still think if we just took care of the ball, caught the passes we should have and had a smidge better play calling scheme then we score about three touchdowns that game. BA should have let Ben come out throwing and then use that to set up the run, and FWP still isn’t seeing his oppurtunities to bounce the run outside. Once all of that starts flowing adding with less drops then the offense will start to score points early.
by Bleed-Black&Gold on Dec 17, 2008 12:06 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
One good thing about our schedule is that the players haven’t had time for their ranking to get to their head. They’ve been playing every game like they don’t even notice their stats. If they can maintain that over the 2 week layoff before the divisional game, I’ll give Tomlin a lot of credit.
charity standing orders
by BadMaafala on Dec 16, 2008 3:47 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Offense
All I expect from the offense is 13-14 pts, win the Time of Possession (keep the D fresh), and no stupid penalties (false starts, taunting, etc)!! I think we can survive a turnover or two, (unless its a pick 6.). Not much to ask. As a team, motivation has never been a problem, Tomlin has them prepared each game.
by fiveSBrings72 on Dec 16, 2008 4:34 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
the rankings get to their head
I llaugh when i see people talk about “rankings” getting to a players head. I’m pretty sure all the platyers feel the same way as I do about them being “ranked” #1 by various sports writers, which is “who gives a shit”.
This is the NFL, not college. Rankings couldn’t possibly mean less.
by worldtrip on Dec 16, 2008 7:09 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
agreed
the rankings are basically just for fans to be able to brag about their team, which i don’t really know who does. I just look at them as an indicator what ESPN thinks of who and whose bandwagon they are on.
by Bleed-Black&Gold on Dec 17, 2008 12:16 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
It is great but
I think that they r playing in “The Desperado” League, so if you don´t have enough reasons to solve that equation U R not with that in your head, you just can´t survive.
So I think they don´t pay attention to the pro bowl, sorry “t kinda waltz”, and they are, I hope, Tomlin is working with all their attention directed to the SB.
O sales tickets,...and let D rest a little, and D Win Championships.
by YeOldeMexFan on Dec 16, 2008 8:42 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
A lot of ...
people are being paid a lot of money for flooding the Internet [bless Al Gore] with statistics.
13-14 points is not enough to demand from an offense, great D or not. As cited in another story, a team is living on a razor’s edge with that little O. The defense has no room for error. At that level of offensive, a team could hypothetically have to rely on a referee’s reversal to win [and before anyone goes beserk, I think the reversal was justified in that the pass/catch met everyone requirement to be called a TD, including breaking the plane].
by tenthmtnman on Dec 17, 2008 4:16 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
Agreed
If one pass gets deflected at the LoS and falls into the hands of a defender for a pick-6, we’ve lost the game. Our offense has the team walking on thin ice.
LeBeau’s defense can keep just about any opponent to less than 17 points, but our offense needs to contribute. The offense cannot give the opponent short-field opportunities as they did in the beginning and middle of the season. They don’t need to play “elite” football, but they cannot make big mistakes and must put at least an average number of points on the board.
by Varmint on Dec 17, 2008 10:34 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs

by 


















