How do you get a dominant o-line?
Every team wants one (or should if they are run well), but it's a little late in the season to get new blood on the line, gifts from St. Nick not withstanding.
Last season, quite a few teams decided they needed to improve the line, and want after the postions in the draft with a vengence. So far, the Broncos and Panthers' choices have paid off. But it is a little early to grade things like this. Instead, it pays to look at the teams that have dominant lines now, because of what they have done in the last few years. The Giants have a great line, but it is the Titans that deserves high praise. A combination of drafting, free agent acquisition and coaching have been their foundation.

Who are these guys:
Kevin Mawae (C)
Michael Roos (LT)
David Stewart (RT)
Jake Scott (RG)
Eugene Amano (LG)
Before examining each, it is important to point out these guys have started all 15 games. They are both talented and durable. This is not a patchwork squad, and working as a cohesive unit if not trumping individual ability, then at least augments individual performance in a way stats cannot meaningfully measure. Still, Collins has been sacked 8 times! Would that Ben had such a luxury. And Chris Johnson is a talent, but LenDale and his TD total greatly benefits from the 5 guys doing the hardwork.
Mawae-
This guy is 37. In the 2005 season, a torn tricep limited his effectiveness and he was released by the Jets. An injured (and 35 at the time) center doesn't get to rest on pro bowl laurels. (By-the-by, the Jets are pretty happy with replacement Nick Mangold).
The Titans signed him in the 2006 offseason- a move that became necessary when their center Justin Hartwig (yup) turned down an offer and went to Carolina. Mawae's leadership/experience was talked about as a strong plus given the Titans' relative inexperience. His play was nothing special last season, but this year, with Collins in the pocket, Mawae has shown a resurgence. Casey Hampton would certainly agree.
Roos and Stewart were 2005 draft picks 41st and 113th overall, respectively. The Steelers selected Trai Essex with the 93rd selection. Roos has started every game, while Stewart became the starter in 2006. Both have remained healthy, and are unsung talents. If you were wondering why the Steelers were not getting sacks, well, keep in mind this tandem also held Mario Williams without a sack in both meetings this year.
Jake Scott signed with the team this past offseason for 4 years at $5 million. The Titans snatched him from the Colts after losing Jacob Bell to the Rams (signed for 6 years/$36 mil with $16 mil guaranteed). Bell has struggled with injuries. Scott has been a fantastic pulling guard and the Colts have struggled to run the ball as effectively this year in his absence. The Colts would have loved to still have him, but they didn't have the money. *Did the Steelers show any interest? I don't recall hearing anything.
Amano was a backup last year, but beat out Leroy Harris to take the starting job. He was selected in '04 239th overall as a center and has been a career backup with the team until this season. It's nice that they had such talent practically wasting away on the bench. Given his chance, Amano has risen to the task at hand. A strong consideration for a pro bowl nod.
Aside from the players, it needs to be mentioned that the o-lin coach Mike Munchak (himself a HOF guard inducted in 01) gets very little praise, but he is a tremendous coach. He is great at developing young talent, and he has revitalized Mawae in the twilight of his career.
1 recs |
9 comments
Comments
Funny. PGH had a good story on building a great defense a few days ago: http://www.postgameheroes.com/?p=5038
We need to apply the principles we apply on the defense to the offense, but we don’t, can’t, or won’t.
by steelguy99 on
Dec 23, 2008 12:43 PM EST
reply
actions
0 recs
I'd say haven't
instead of don’t, can’t, or won’t (i’m hopeful)
if a few signings were different, and some o-linemen were available in good spots for us in the draft a few more times, o-line would be very different.
However, o-line coach is a steady factor, regardless of roster, so… yeah. I’m gonna just go with maryrose’s wish and hope we hit on a good FA signing and a OL that has value for the pick in an early round in the draft (or two).
by tkired on
Dec 23, 2008 1:41 PM EST
reply
actions
0 recs
Steelers just signed Jason Capizzi
I am guessing that means marvel goes on IR. Looks like they are trying to shore up the O-line for the playoffs.
by vin2k on
Dec 23, 2008 1:52 PM EST
reply
actions
0 recs
I hope so. I really hope it doesn’t come down to it, but I’d rather have someone who can’t play very well instead of someone who can’t play at all.
by steelguy99 on
Dec 23, 2008 1:58 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
You build oline through the draft
The offensive line requires the most cohesion out of any unit on the field. They need to know exactly where each guy will be on every snap. They also, collectively, need to be the qbs personal bodyguard, and the roadgrader that opens up holes for rbs. You can’t just sign a bunch of FA’s and expect them to gel over the course of 1-2 seasons.
This draft is vital. The most important draft that the Steelers have faced in the last few years. We need a foundation on the line. I believe that 1 FA signing could help us (Jordan Gross, as I’ve now mentioned in 3 separate posts), but the core of the line must be born and raised Steeler.
by NoCal-SteelCity on
Dec 23, 2008 2:49 PM EST
reply
actions
0 recs
Maybe we should be consulting lebeau for the draft and any UDFA’s this year, on the offensive side as well as defensive side. Or maybe the FO needs to be thinking about the O-line drafts differently.
Instead of which O-line you think is good, how about which O-line guy our D-line/LBs would have a hard time with. Whatever our strategy has been post-SB, it hasn’t worked. Stapleton seems like the best pick up in the past few years for the O-line, and that is saying something.
by steelguy99 on
Dec 23, 2008 3:17 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
great article
Thank you for doing this.
Interesting that their line isnt stocked with high draft picks. Coaching I think is a huge part of it.
by Blitzburgh on
Dec 23, 2008 11:41 PM EST
reply
actions
0 recs
Coaching, coaching, coaching
I’d rather have a great coach and mediocre linemen than good linemen and a mediocre coach. A great coach can make mediocre line very good, wereas good linemen can never be better than good with a mediocre coach.
Thoughtful discussion with a sense of history
by maryrose on
Dec 24, 2008 11:14 PM EST
reply
actions
0 recs









