Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Jerry Sandusky's Wife Tries To Run A Reporter Over

Hampton's Penalty Sets Stage for the Rest of the Year

Can one play make a season? Does one string of plays have the ability to change a team's momentum for the whole year?

The common story surrounding the New York Giants' Super Bowl run in 2007-08 was how the team was positively affected by the absence of Jeremy Shockey. Now they're saying the same thing about the former Steelers wide receiver (and possibly former NFL player) Plaxico Burress.

Fortunately, the Steelers have a much smaller event in comparison. Early in the third quarter of their Week 13 road match-up against New England, the usually-quiet nose tackle Casey Hampton was called for a dubious defensive holding penalty. It negated a 3rd and 2 situation, and gave the Patriots a first down.

Big Snack blew his lid.

He's not a guy who shows his emotion on the field often, but he lost his composure as he gestulated toward the officials, signaling his disagreement with the call.

Everyone watching the game felt the momentum of that 10-10 game swing. The Patriots picked up a first down, and then Hampton completely destroyed the middle of the line, busted through and recorded his first sack of the season, knocking Matt Cassel back six yards.

And oh boy, did he ever let the Patriots - and the officials, it seemed - know about it. His teammates were jumping all over him and he flailed his arms wildly, a sign of in-your-face defiance for the percieved slight against him.

That energy shifted over to the offense, who put together perhaps their most complete drive in their last four games, going 79 yards, but settling for a field goal, and a 13-10 lead.

Then came the huge special teams fumble from Matthew "A.C." Slater that was recovered by Keyaron Fox. The momentum was growing. A quick Hines Ward touchdown, 20-10 Steelers lead.

Did anyone want to be Matt Cassel at this point?

He knew the defense was going to be coming after him through any means necessary - land, air and sea - and they were going to put him on the ground. James Harrison picked up two sacks, causing two fumbles, both recovered by Pittsburgh. Short of a gutty Patriots red zone defense that forced two Jeff Reed field goals, and one miss, the Steelers ran the defending AFC Champions out of their own stadium.

It's all about momentum.

Was this Butterfly Effect truly caused by Hampton's penalty?  We'll never know conclusively, but leaders lead through decisive action, and perhaps more importantly, reaction. Hampton isn't a player whose contributions are readily noticeable, but his teammates know he's good enough at what he does, when he speaks, they should listen.

Hampton told the NFL loudly and clearly, "don't poke the bear." You're not going to like what happens.

Free safety Ryan Clark's Hit of the Year nomination on Wes Welker fired up the defense even more (yet another penalty on that), and at this point in the season, judging by the team's response to that hit and Hampton's penalty, it's clear to say the defense has obtained that crucial "us-against-the-world" mentality all Super Bowl champions have. After Clark's hit, LaMarr Woodley got into it with Randy Moss. Every defender wanted a piece of New England at that point. It was as if they wanted the offense to take three knees and punt, and getting back to beating the blue off of Cassel's jersey.

The momentum they gained in that win will have to carry them into perhaps their toughest match-up of the season with Dallas. While the media darling Cowboys are building some momentum of their own, they have to be asking themselves, very bluntly, "how much do we want to be Tony Romo right now?"

 

 

Comment 37 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Fat Casey

Hampton’s play was certainly inspiring, but only validates that the man takes plays off. He should be much more dominating than he is. He’s not double teamed nearly as much as he used to. When Chris Hoke is in there, he makes plays.

by bobbyp28 on Dec 3, 2008 8:23 AM EST reply actions  

YEP

You said exactly what I wanted to say. Is he not paid to play mean and ferocious and bust through the line and sack the QB every now and then?

Every day brings future to past, every breath leaves me one less to my last. DT

by usmcsdi69 on Dec 4, 2008 10:42 AM EST up reply actions  

Uhm...

I think the Giants offense and defense are more efficient than The Boy’s despite the fact that they have the (cough cough) better QB. We beat you guys, I believe, mainly on that safety. It took the air outta the building and gave the Jints great field position on the following possession. This was w/ great field conditions and the game was still air tight, not to mention your O wasn’t clicking. If the field conditions are sloppy you guys will wipe that gay smile off Romo’s face. Please do so Steelers. Please.

by ProudYankee on Dec 3, 2008 9:37 AM EST reply actions  

Have to say

Losing to the Giants was not so bad, partly because they are a good team and partly because they seem to have pretty good fans. Cowboys, on the other hand, have obnoxious bandwagon fans. I can’t wait for the Steelers to “Wes Welker” those guys.

by CarlWeathersMustache on Dec 3, 2008 11:06 AM EST up reply actions  

Seriously?

I have never met more Giants fans in my life than I have between February and now. Coincidence? Also on an unrelated note your user name is hilarious.

"When it's third and ten, you can take the milk drinkers and I'll take the whiskey drinkers every time." -Max McGee

by BigDinSC on Dec 3, 2008 12:00 PM EST up reply actions  

yea

cause up until Feb we were crying about why Accorsi picked Eli. Lol I keeps it real. And even the most optimistic fan couldn’t see 11-1 after the SB run.

by ProudYankee on Dec 3, 2008 1:00 PM EST up reply actions  

That is an awesome name

As is Carl Weathers.

"....It is more about them than it is about the team. Cannot play with them. Cannot win with them. Cannot coach with them. Can’t do it. I want winners!" - Mike Singletary

by DennardC on Dec 3, 2008 3:25 PM EST up reply actions  

well

I became a casual Giants fan after that Super Bowl, so I find that not surprising at all. Anyone who humbles Brady, his hairdresser, Belicheat, and the Patsies is a friend of mine.

Brandona

by PrimantisStillersNAt on Dec 3, 2008 6:17 PM EST up reply actions  

The hit on Welker was devastating

but I would have liked it more if Welker actually had the ball. I don’t think Clark is a dirty player but that was not something we would have approved of if it had happened to one of our players. Nonetheless, it probably set the tone for the Patriot wide receivers and kept them out of the middle of the field which is always a good thing.

by Steev1705 on Dec 3, 2008 9:40 AM EST reply actions  

The penalty

The description of the penalty was kind of ridiculous. The ball was tipped on it’s way to Welker. Yes, it fell a few yards short, but I’ve seen that same play many times with no flag. There was no helmet-to-helmet, and Clark didn’t leave his feet until after he made contact with Welker. Or, at least to me, it looked like his feet left the ground as he made contact with Welker, suggesting that impact of the hit caused his feet to the leave the ground. It didn’t look like he launched himself into Welker.

by WolfpackSteelersFan on Dec 3, 2008 12:30 PM EST up reply actions  

I disagree

I watched the video several times and it definitely looks like he launched himself into Welker. That said, the ball was tipped so I suppose he can use that as a defense and hope he won’t get fined. Nonetheless, if someone did that to Hines Ward we wouldn’t disagree with the call.

by Steev1705 on Dec 3, 2008 1:50 PM EST up reply actions  

We’ll just have to disagree on that one. Apparently, launching into a WR isn’t a foul anyway, though, according to the recent FanPost. So, even if he did, which, again, to me, it looked like the impact of the hit caused his feet to the ground, but even if he did launch himself, that’s not against the rules. From what I understand, the rule is that you can’t hit another player when the play is clearly over (or the player has clearly stopped playing). Neither of those were true in this case. The ball landed well short of Welker, but that was not clear at the time of Clark’s hit on him. Clark hit him at the time the ball would have gotten there if it hadn’t been tipped.

by WolfpackSteelersFan on Dec 3, 2008 2:18 PM EST up reply actions  

Think about the Colts game...

and the two tipped balls that were caught for huge gains…..

I only wish Clark would have been there to lay the wood on those plays….could have won the game for us.

Hit the receivers and make them cry to momma!

by SCSteeler on Dec 4, 2008 10:09 AM EST up reply actions  

Actually

IIRC, Clark missed the tackle on the first tipped ball that went in for the TD.

by WolfpackSteelersFan on Dec 4, 2008 3:35 PM EST up reply actions  

Yeah

Clark fanned. You don’t see that often.

by CarlWeathersMustache on Dec 4, 2008 10:04 PM EST up reply actions  

well

Clark was doing his job, basically assuming the CB missed the ball. He was running full steam toward where the ball was going before it was tipped. It would have been nearly impossible to tackle Wayne, who was running at full speed up field and happened to have the ball land in his pocket. That TD is on Ike, particularly Ike’s hands. That’s why he’s not a pro-bowler.

charity standing orders

by BadMaafala on Dec 5, 2008 8:23 AM EST up reply actions  

agreed

If Ike doesn’t tip it Clark lays a big hit on Wayne.

by Chicago Steeler on Dec 5, 2008 12:38 PM EST up reply actions  

Fat Casey

Hampton probably blew his assignment on that play, so he was lucky they didn’t run the ball up the middle. I’m not faulting him, I’m just saying that if he tried to get around the center more instead of through him (like Shaun Rogers, for instance), we’d give up more gashing running plays like the Browns do. It does make you think that he could stay in for passing situations occasionally, though.

charity standing orders

by BadMaafala on Dec 3, 2008 10:59 AM EST reply actions  

good call maafala

yes, more than likely Casey made the decision to bull rush no matter what. To say that he takes plays off because he doesn’t do that every time is assuming he’s supposed to do that every time. Casey has one real job and that’s to eat up 2 blockers at all times. If the opposition can just influence him to one side and let him blow by a running play he’s useless to us. Casey has to stay at home and not be moved and he does a tremendous job of this.

That being said, love seeing the big man come to the table and eat.

by Chicago Steeler on Dec 3, 2008 1:27 PM EST up reply actions  

hampton’s ALWAYS at the table ready to eat

by NoCal-SteelCity on Dec 3, 2008 7:34 PM EST up reply actions  

You guys are assuming that lebeau didn’t assign casey to sit on Cassel. I think he did.

by steelguy99 on Dec 4, 2008 8:19 AM EST up reply actions  

Maybe

but I think that’s optimistic thinking. If LeBeau thought he could do that, why does he take him out on 3rd downs?

charity standing orders

by BadMaafala on Dec 4, 2008 10:08 AM EST up reply actions  

Because he weighs as much as jupiter and is exhausted after the 1st two downs?

by steelguy99 on Dec 5, 2008 8:00 AM EST up reply actions  

I don’t buy that. He played several downs in a row before the got his sack and it didn’t stop him from making the play. I don’t see why he couldn’t do that more often if he was used as a penetrating DT on 3rd down, but I’ve never seen him used like that under LeBeau.

charity standing orders

by BadMaafala on Dec 5, 2008 8:31 AM EST up reply actions  

Anger does a lot for a player in terms of giving them energy. I’m just hypothesizing here, I don’t think any of us really knows what the deal is.

by steelguy99 on Dec 5, 2008 2:14 PM EST up reply actions  

big lazy snack

I’m very happy we have the big man. But I have to agree with Fat Casey. My first thought when I saw that play was DAMN! Why doesn’t he do that more often? He’s obviously capable. Is there any way to make him angry on a more regular basis?

by moonjockey on Dec 3, 2008 1:13 PM EST reply actions  

Read BM’s point above. Casey’s job is not to tackle the QB, it’s to take up space.

by steelguy99 on Dec 4, 2008 8:19 AM EST up reply actions  

What's good for the goose...

That is a fair question, and it’s got this Cowboys fan sweating. But what about the other shoe? Dallas has 40 sacks, and Big Ben gets sacked far more than Romo. I’m not sure many Steeler fans would like to be Roethlisburger this weekend, either.

Dave Morgan

by DMorgan on Dec 3, 2008 1:46 PM EST reply actions  

valid point

We have omitted this from out discussion, partly because he’s been sacked only once in the past 2 games and we’ve forgotten some of the previous games. Those two games were against some of the worst pressure defenses in the NFL, of course. On the other hand, the Cowboys seem to have found their pass rush just in time to play the 49ers and Seahawks. Equally unimpressive, if you ask me. Still, our OL is improving, and Ben (probably the biggest cause of the sack numbers) has been better at getting the ball out quicker. The offense has been doing a good job of using RB’s in the passing game, keeping free blitzers to a minimum, and make the right hot reads. I’m sure Ware and Ratliff will close the deal a few times, but we’ve been gradually improving since the Eagles embarassment, so I don’t forsee the ’boys pressure completely neutralizing our offense.

I think one of the biggest questions that will determine the game is how we can run the ball. Parker is finally back in the lineup and we’re splitting the carries effectively. Stopping the run isn’t the Cowboys’ strong suit, so if we can move the ball on the ground, it will make Ben’s life a lot easier.

charity standing orders

by BadMaafala on Dec 3, 2008 2:32 PM EST up reply actions  

'Boys run D improving

You’re right, but I’d say the Cowboys run D is actually stronger than the pass D at this point. It’ll be interesting to see how either team does on the new surface this weekend. Could be that a slip at an inopportune moment will be the deciding play.

Dave Morgan

by DMorgan on Dec 3, 2008 3:58 PM EST up reply actions  

I’ll give you credit for shutting down Gore, but if you stack the box like you did against the ‘9ers, you’ll find out that Roethlisberger is better than Shaun Hill.

charity standing orders

by BadMaafala on Dec 3, 2008 4:08 PM EST up reply actions  

please dont

ever put hill and roethlisberger in the same sentence on BTSC ever again :)

by Michael Bean on Dec 3, 2008 8:48 PM EST up reply actions  

Casey Hampton

Great story on a clearly game changing emotional outburst. However, there was nothing dubious about it; he was holding, not one, but two guys at once. Superb, but illegal display of upper body strength.

by tenthmtnman on Dec 3, 2008 5:35 PM EST reply actions  

Technically he was holding

but he was also being held.

That was a ticky tack call anyway you look at it. He had every right to be pissed, I sure was. If they call that there they should have called at LEAST one hold on Matt Fight holding deebo.

by 703Steeler on Dec 4, 2008 12:35 PM EST up reply actions  

By far my favorite play of the game

Big Snack could have picked up a car and thrown it he was so mad.

by SteelerDomination on Dec 4, 2008 12:55 AM EST reply actions  

amazing

can anyone remember the last time the opposing offense was called for holding,it definately hasn’t been called nearly as much as it should be. and i’m not talking about well maybe that was holding i’m talking blatant out and out pulling harrison to the ground holding and if that isn’t holding then the steelers sure do get called for it an awful lot (see the hold on willies touchdown run in the colts game

by billsteelcity on Dec 5, 2008 10:20 AM EST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to BTSC, a blog dedicated to the SIX-time world champion Steelers.

"Thoughtful discussion with a sense of history."

Art Rooney Jr.

"Level-headed thinking." Pittsburgh Post-Gazette

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
A Letter to Hines Ward
Franco72_small
The Last Sunday
Small
Joe Greene on Steelers Offense Under BA
Small
Homer reps BTSC and Steeler Nation on Washington Post Front Page
Small
Your Super Bowl Hate Guide

Recent FanPosts

Small
My Top 11 2nd Round Prospects
Small
Who are your Top 5 Steelers of all time?
Steel-ball-logo-poster_small
Knowing Your Guards: A look at the 2012 Prospects (Updated 2/11/12)
Rodthreerivers_small
Report: Steelers Don't Want Ward
Small
Analyzing the Steelers 2008 Draft
Small
My Top 11 Prospects for our First Round Pick
Small
Ike Taylor restructures, over 18 million in cap space created so far this offseason
Small
Analyzing the Steelers 2009 Draft
Small
6 Round NFL Mock Draft

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Terrible Towel Talk

Listen to internet radio with Michael Bean on Blog Talk Radio


Site Founder & Editor

Imag0299_small Michael Bean

Steelers Historian

Steeler_small maryrose

Bison_small Neal Coolong

Contributing Authors

Small Ivan Cole (RickVa)

Franco72_small 5020

Btsc_head_shot_small Rebecca Rollett

Small big_jay71

Stogs_small John Stephens

178896_499126548441_596563441_5939410_7960015_n_small Anthony Defeo