Behind the Steel Curtain: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:





McFarland To Hold Private Workout June 4

As was discussed in the comments section of our initial 53-man roster breakdown, Anthony 'Booger' McFarland would be a welcome addition to a thin Steelers' defensive line. McFarland, who missed all of last season with a torn patellar tendon, will be holding a private, individual workout in Tampa, Florda early next month, with the intention of proving to organizations that he's fully healed and ready to play solid football in 2008.

Because he's a free-agent, the Steelers will have competition in acquiring his services if they are sufficiently convinced he's recovered and ready to play. But having played for Mike Tomlin in Tampa Bay during the Bucs Super Bowl year might help our cause in courting him.

I'm going to hold off on speculating what McFarland could bring to the table until he has his workout, but there's several things to consider:

1) How much will he cost and what's our cap situation with and without him?

2) Do we need to start restructuring contracts and/or freeing up some cap space to get a fair deal in order before the workout?

3) Is there any way to know what we might have in our UDFA DL signings before then to help us make a determination of our immediate needs?

We'll see what happens but don't be surprised if we're able to add some much needed depth along the defensive line sooner than you might think. If so, perhaps some of us who are upset that we didn't address our needs in the trenches in this year's draft, can take a step back from the ledge and get excited about the explosive, if not overly physical, team we will be fielding in 2008.

0 recs | Comment 8 comments

Story-email Email | Print |

Comments

Display:

If he’s physically OK, then the Steelers should sign him. He’d provide much needed depth behind the big 3. No way do you check out the UDFA’s before you sign him. They are undrafted for a reason.

by Cols714 on May 13, 2008 12:08 PM EDT   0 recs

completely agree

its risky, yes, but i think if his workout meets or exceeds expectations, you sign him if the opportunity is there and the price is right. in any case they ARE going to address the d-line before the start of the season. it created a huge problem when smith went down and the steelers know it. this is a smart organization. they won’t just ignore the situation from last season hoping it doesn’t happen again. i have faith that they’ll find the best viable solution available to them.

by SE7ENS on May 13, 2008 12:17 PM EDT   0 recs

DL Depth

I’d rather see Booger on the field at DE instead of Eason so if he’s healthy I hope they make a run at him. Any kind of significant injury to Smith or Hampton still sinks this unit though.

by cgolden on May 13, 2008 1:21 PM EDT   0 recs

Booger and money

SalCap’s website isn’t working very well these days, but he says we’re under the cap by $1.682M minus Eason’s hit this year (maybe $800k?). That’s not enough to sign rookies, much less a FA. The obvious move is to give Starks a longer contract, which we could break down in a very cap friendly way, if necessary. If we had the balls to cut Mahan and Davenport in June, we would save something like $2M and $1M respectively, but they usually don’t do something like that until training camp. I don’t know what Eason is making, but cutting either him or Kirschke would give us a little more money as well.

If McFarland is healthy he’d be an upgrade over Eason/Kirschke, and if we can get him for fairly cheap, I’d go for it. The Starks mystery is the biggest obstacle to that happening for now.

by BadMaafala on May 13, 2008 2:09 PM EDT   0 recs

look out for Dookie

The way I understand it they’ll save 1 million if when they cut Davenport. If he’s standing in the way of them signing McFarland, I sure hope they pick Booger over Dookie (sorry that was excessively lame).

by cgolden on May 13, 2008 2:23 PM EDT to parent up   0 recs

Bad choice

From what I’ve heard, we’ve already brought in Booger several weeks ago and he failed a physical. I respect everything the guy has done in his career, but I don’t see us signing him if we’ve already been shot down by damaged goods. Good guy, not so good free agent.

by tecmo on May 13, 2008 3:05 PM EDT   0 recs

Injury

I’ll agree that if he’s not healed from his injuries he’s not going to help us, but remember that he failed the physical in March and his workout is in June. He’s a mid-to-late career player trying to come back from an injury, so it’s taking some time. The Steelers didn’t close the door after he failed the physical, but they wanted to see him healthy before signing him. It’s definitely worth seeing how he does in his workout.

by BadMaafala on May 13, 2008 4:49 PM EDT to parent up   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to BTSC, a blog dedicated to the five-time world champion Steelers. "Level-headed thinking." Pittsburgh Post-Gazette

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Small
Steeler's biggest challenger in AFC North
Small
Steelers Question of the Week: Offense vs. Defense vs. Special Teams
Girl-tv1_small
Steelers Links
Small
Effect of Ownership outcome on looming CBA deadline
Small
Espn story on the Rooneys
G_small
Meet the Youngest Steelers Fan in the World
Img_0163_small
Steelers Still Interested in Kevin Jones???
Small
Prowlbowl center for sale;cheap!!
Small
Steelers Question of the Week: 2008 Training Camp Battles
Small
Notes on the 2007 Season from the Football Outsiders

Post_icon New FanPost All FanPosts Carrot-mini


Site Editors

Small Blitzburgh

Editors

G_small cgolden

ad

Site Meter