This Is One Example Of Why There's A Labor Dispute On The Horizon: Matt Ryan Just Got More $$$ Than Ben Roethlisberger
Carson Palmer received $38 million guaranteed after proving himself early in his career. Peyton Manning got nearly $35 million. Ben Roethlisberger received roughly $32 million in guaranteed money in his recent contract extension.
Those guys are worth the money, no?
Well, what about Matt Ryan!!??!!
How about $34.75 million in guaranteed money! The total contract is for $72 million, over 6 years, at least according to ESPN.com.
There's some fantastic restaurants, lovely young ladies, and ample night-life in Atlanta. Now that you're filthy rich Matt, you may need to pick up a few table manners and not eat like you're at a feeding trough. Got it?
Matt freakin' Ryan. The highest paid QB in NFL history in terms of guaranteed money per year. That's revolting.
0 recs |
61
comments
Comments
wow.
5.79 million GUARANTEED per year, for a QB who hasn’t played a single snap in the league. and he wasn’t even the first pick. this is also the first time i remember a lower pick getting a higher contract than the no. 1 overall pick. usually teams use what the no. 1 guy got to slot no. 2, then no. 3 and so on…......this will really mess up Parcells (supposed) intended plan to help move rookie salaries down by getting Jake Long to a cheaper deal this year (J. Long’s deal was smaller than previous no. 1’s—first time it decreased in years).
by TheMostViolentTeam on May 20, 2008 4:52 PM EDT 0 recs
this deal
is a sign of how ridiculous rookie contracts are. here you have a guy guaranteed more money than Peyton Manning, Tom Brady, and Ben Roethlisberger. who if you haven’t noticed, have won some Super Bowls in the past few years. I can’t even explain how shocked/appalled I am. I’m gonna hop on the Atlanta fan page and see if there fans are excited, because they shouldn’t be!
by TheMostViolentTeam on May 20, 2008 4:56 PM EDT 0 recs
sarcasm, seriousness?
Or is he overrated compared to his MONSTER contract?
by tkired on
May 22, 2008 5:57 AM EDT
up
0 recs
Ri-Dic-U-Lous
Just silly… I can not freakin’ believe that.
by Chicago Steeler on May 20, 2008 4:59 PM EDT 0 recs
nevermind, this is a good signing
i forgot that Arthur Blank (Falcons owner) has a crystal ball when it comes to signing QBs to big deals. Mike Vick led the Falcons thru their most gloriest days and…...oh, wait, nevermind.
by TheMostViolentTeam on May 20, 2008 5:03 PM EDT 0 recs
lol
Sheesh. For a team trying to retool in tons of areas, this is pathetic. Obviously this is the way the market is now, but Arthur Blank HAS to realize that this wasn’t a deep year in terms of QBs. Ryan doesnt deserve this type of money.
by Blitzburgh on
May 20, 2008 5:05 PM EDT
up
0 recs
in all seriousness
the Falcons just took (another!!) massive risk giving a big contract to an unproven QB. i could somewhat see the justification for Vick, who was really a mediocre QB but disguised this with his electrifying (and crowd-friendly) style, so Blank can justify paying Vick the big contract because he generates such massive interest in the team. however, while Ryan will draft interest in the team, not nearly on Vick’s level, and now fans who buy tickets are going to be putting pressure on the coaches to play Ryan very early in his career. and that can be really tough on a young QBs development. just a massive, massive risk.
by TheMostViolentTeam on
May 20, 2008 5:09 PM EDT
up
0 recs
sorry to be posting so much but
this is ridiculous. any of you guys good with video editing? i’m 100% confident if I mail a highlight package of me playing nerf football on the beach I can squeeze a few million out of the Falcons.
by TheMostViolentTeam on May 20, 2008 5:05 PM EDT 0 recs
rookie scale
i agree this is a horrible deal, but i was also wondering if this is gonna screw up next year’s rookie contracts even more.
by tkired on May 20, 2008 5:29 PM EDT 0 recs
Yeah, but....
Brady and Roethlisberger both won Super Bowls while working on THEIR ENTRY LEVEL CONTRACTS, so did Eli Manning this past season. Brady may have won all 3 on his first contract, actually. Peyton Manning didn’t, but certainly made the Colts strong contenders while working on his first deal. Likewise for Carson Palmer. Ryan will be 29 years old when this deal expires, there have been a lot of Super Bowls won by under 30 year old QBs over the years. Probably more than have been won by 30 and older QBs.
by robert ethan on May 20, 2008 5:33 PM EDT 0 recs
huh
i don’t follow…
when ryan shows signs of being good in an NFL game, maybe we can compare him with Brady, Ben, etc. but for now he’s an untested rookie, in a weak qb class, he does not deserve anywhere near the guaranteed money these other guys do.
by tkired on
May 20, 2008 5:42 PM EDT
up
0 recs
Ryan's contract...
is not outrageous because he is young, but because he has not proven ANYTHING at this level yet.
by tkired on
May 20, 2008 5:43 PM EDT
up
0 recs
at least
those older guys had some prior performance to base their contracts on. Ryan’s does not. this would be like buying into an IPO of a company (at a massive cost) that had yet to produce a product. it’s a massive risk. and maybe since there is a chance the league could become uncapped, Atlanta was willing to take the risk, but from what I’ve seen NO NFL teams have the massive extra cash (like the Yankees or Red Sox) to completely throw away money.
by TheMostViolentTeam on
May 20, 2008 5:46 PM EDT
up
0 recs
You guys aren't using logic...
I’m sure that when top picks like the Manning brothers, Palmer, and even Roethlisberger, signed their rookie contracts they were earning as much or more than most of the veteran QBs in the league. So, by following your line of reasoning, those deals were mistakes and they shouldn’t have been signed. I don’t think anyone in the organizations involved has the slightest remorse about giving them the money they did at a young age. It’s not foolproof obviously, there have been lots of highly drafted, highly paid QBs who haven’t developed, but the team has to go on the best information it has at the time.
by robert ethan on
May 20, 2008 6:16 PM EDT
up
0 recs
robert
In some regards you are correct – obviously salaries have gone up over time, meaning that the latest QB crop to sign big deals (Manning, Ben, Palmer), were making less as rookies than what the ‘elite’ QBs were signing while they were on their rookie contracts.
But what you’re failing to understand or acknowledge is that rookie pay scales have gone through the roof in the last couple of years. THis is nothing debatable. It’s one of the reasons there’s a huge mess going on between the owners and players’ union.
The pay scale between rookies and veteran ‘deserving’ players did not used to be like this. Even the sure-bet rookies over recent history did not get anything close to this kind of money, both as a fixed sum obviously and as a % of the team’s operating expenses and salary cap allocations.
by Blitzburgh on
May 20, 2008 6:28 PM EDT
up
0 recs
forgot the pay scales
The only thing we all need to look at to understand how ridiculous this contract is Jamarcus Russell’s contract. There’s no possible excuse why Ryan’s contract should be more than Russell’s. The Falcons just blew their load too quickly.
I can’t imagine having nearly $50 million tied up in a starting QB and RB, neither of which has ever started an NFL game. God, I’m glad I’m not a Falcon fan.
by cgolden on
May 21, 2008 9:08 AM EDT
up
0 recs
It's a free market system
The money being paid to the rooks is what the teams are willing to pay. If it wasn’t financially sound over the long term the teams would not pay the money. QBs are an exception, but many position players are at their best in their first five years in the league. Especially running backs. They should be allowed to leave college a year or so earlier than other position players. A lot of them leave their best games behind them by the time they turn pro.
by robert ethan on May 20, 2008 6:50 PM EDT 0 recs
this is a constant
problem with the NFL. Rookie contracts are joke and they are continuing to spiral out of control. The crazy thing, is that the agent that represented Ryan is the same guy that represented Long! How do you think that phone call will go? I would be royally pissed as the #1 overall pick if my agent got a guy below me more money.
It also makes absolutely no sense from a business perspective. You name one Fortune 500 company that would hire a kid right out of college at a CEO pricetag. I’m glad that the owners did opt out of their contract…
http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/news/story?id=3404596
In that article, you can see that they specifically mention rookies as one of the three main points. What I don’t understand is how the Player’s Union would not be behind this as well. You would think that the majority of veterans would see moves like this and just scratch their heads.
Other major sports have rookie caps, most prominently the NBA, why can’t football?
Robert – I am not sure how you can say that this holds no logic. Again, prove to me how paying a guy out of college top dollar(and by top dollar, I mean higher than hugely successful long term vets) makes any sense. Just because Ben and the Manning twins have panned out does not mean that their deals were justified. The fact is that there are way more highly drafted QBs that just don’t pan out, than ones that do.
Since 1998 – the year of the Manning, there have been a total of 28 QBs drafted in the first round. Those that have won a superbowl are Peyton(1st overall), Ben(11th), Eli(1st)and oh, that’s it. The list of QBs that are starting: Rivers(4th), VY(3rd), Cutler(11th), Losman(22nd), Palmer(1st), Grossman(22nd), Pennington(18th), McNabb(2nd), Leinart(10th) and Campbell(25th). Thats it. Pennington and Leinart have not been great, just good. Grossman is terrible, and Losman and Cutler show promise. Vince Young… eh.
The failures – Leftwich(7th), Boller(19th), Carr(1st), Harrington(3rd), Ramsey(32nd), Vick(1st), Akili Smith(3rd), Couch(1st), Culpepper(11th), McNown(12th), Leaf(2nd), and Alex Smith(1st). Russell(1st), Quinn(22nd), and Rodgers(24th) are still untested.
That’s just the QBs. That is a 42% failure rate in 10 years. Less than 10% have won the Superbowl. Only 46% are current starters – and its dicey to say that Pennington and Grossman will continue to start. How can you say these numbers are logical???
by steelerark on May 20, 2008 6:54 PM EDT 0 recs
Lets get real
The Falcons are on par with an expansion team. They are starting from the bottom up and will struggle for the next couple of years before finding any success. Matt Ryan will be their new star quarterback for better or worse. They’ve locked him up for a high price but they also have the position settled for quite some time. If they guessed right they’re geniuses, if not…who cares? They’re the friggin Falcons! It’s not supposed to make sense.
Memo to Arthur Blanc: You could’ve signed me for 96% less money and lost just as many games!!!!
by Steev1705 on May 20, 2008 7:17 PM EDT 0 recs
that is not the point
that Blitz was trying to make. The problem is that rookie contracts are getting way out of control. Every year they escalate, and now they have reached the point where they are greater than the upper echelon in the league. Something has to change, and either it will, or there will be a lockout, in which case everyone loses.
by steelerark on
May 20, 2008 7:33 PM EDT
up
0 recs
i dont think he was really mistaking my point at all
at least if i read correctly. I think he simply started by saying that in their particular case, the Falcons arent really in a lose-lose situation here.
And I would have made the post regardless of who the QB was and who he was drafted by, because as you said ‘ark, the real issue is the nature of the contracts. It just so happens that I think Matt Ryan isnt going to be that great, but that’s not really important here, and of course, is just one man’s speculation.
by Blitzburgh on
May 20, 2008 7:39 PM EDT
up
0 recs
You're right
but to the point, the free market system is working just like it’s supposed to. The owners (market) will no longer tolerate this imbalance and the players (suppliers) will do their best to ensure they don’t lose revenue (currently 60%) which allows for this to happen in the first place. They will probably fight it out and eventually come to some sort of understanding that both sides can swallow. Hopefully they do this sooner rather than later so that we, the fans(customers) don’t suffer.
It’ll work out….I hope. It makes me long for the good old days of a socialist league where the players didn’t have much of a say :-)
by Steev1705 on
May 20, 2008 7:48 PM EDT
up
0 recs
It makes sense from a couple perspectives
First of all, as someone mentioned, Ryan goes into the season pretty much gauranteed to be the team’s starting QB. So he is in the same position as Brady, Roethlisberger, Manning, etc. The most important player for his team. He won’t be as good as any of them off the top, but the assumption is that over the next 6 years he will contribute in a similar fashion. It isn’t out of the question that 5 years down the road Matt Ryan may be the top QB in the league, Tom Brady is hanging on at the tail end of his career, Carson Palmer is retired due to chronic knee injuries, and Ben Roethisberger spends as much time on the disabled list as on the field.
Secondly, football players signing rookie contracts are also being paid for their college careers in a defacto sense. As they should be. Matt Ryan is being paid for all he learned and how he grew and developed since he first set foot on the BC campus in addition to what he will do as a member of the Atlanta Falcons. Pro football is bizarrely unique in it’s requirement that they will not hire an athlete who is not 3 full years removed from high school, and only then in exceptional cases. LeBron James and Sidney Crosby have been the two best players in their respective sport over the past couple of years. They have dominated their sport and earned countless millions of dollars already. If they were 20 year old football players they would be living in dormitories, lining up to eat at the cafeteria, and worrying about whether or not to accept a discount Ipod from a local merchant.
Other sports are even more extreme. There was a story in the local paper recently about a 9 year old 4th grader who was moving from Canada to play soccer in Spain for the Barcelona youth squad. All expenses paid for he and his family. Probably including an Ipod for the kid..:). Michelle Wei was a millionaire athlete before she reached high school, and the same for many tennis phenoms. The very best football athletes are still riding the subway and scalping college football tickets for spending money at the age of 22 or 23.
by robert ethan on May 20, 2008 7:47 PM EDT 0 recs
all over the place
college athletes probably should be paid (and many are, under the table), but this is an NCAA problem, not the NFL’s
Also, Lebron’s rookie contract was like anyone else’s, not that big. He has made most of his money from Nike, etc.
Non-american football, aka soccer, employs tons of youths through various feeder leagues, some get paid a lot, others don’t.
Michelle Wie was in High school when she started making money, but she did NOT turn pro until she started doing well against good(professional) competition, and her money mostly comes from endorsements as well.
Poor student athletes are a creation of the NCAA.
by tkired on May 20, 2008 7:53 PM EDT 0 recs
James and Crosby
Were both multi millionaires at the age of 18 courtesy of professional sport contracts. Before either would have taken his first college class. I remember when Maurice Clarett tried to leave Ohio State early, he ended up being excorciated by the media and fans, despite the fact that he had excelled at a position that was easily duplicated at the pro level. At the same time, fellow Buckeye sophomore Ryan Kesler (a hockey player) signed a $5 million three year deal with the Vancouver Canucks and not an eyebrow was raised, even though Kesler was a full year younger than Clarett and hadn’t had nearly as impressive a season on the ice for Ohio State the previous season. Blatant double standard, and it probably ruined Clarett’s life, as well as diminishing Mike William’s severely. Kesler has had nothing but success, is regarded as one of the better young players in the NHL and a probable future captain for his team. It isn’t that football players can’t step up at a younger age. Look at what Adrian Petersen did this past season. He was the most dangerous offensive player in the league from the get go, and probably could have started two years earlier in his career. Patrick Willis on defense. Even if he was only 60% as good a year or two earlier in his career Willis would have been a starting NFL linebacker.
by robert ethan on
May 20, 2008 8:09 PM EDT
up
0 recs
i suppose,
but these athletes who were paid millions were NOT given 72 million Guaranteed from their team. No rookie should.
Anyway, i would agree that the NCAA needs to rethink their treatment of student athletes, and the NFL does have a particularly draconian age limit, which i generally disagree with, but Amobi Okoye was real young when he entered the draft.
The issue here is that the top end of NFL rookies get paid too much compared to the average NFL player.
by tkired on
May 20, 2008 8:20 PM EDT
up
0 recs
lets be clear on one thing
The only thing that ruined Maurice Clarett’s life was Maurice Clarett. I will admit that not letting him play college ball again was idiotic and bureaucratic, but HE made all those idiotic choices. He chose to fall in with the crowd that he did, he chose to drive down the road with tons of guns, drugs and wearing a bulletproof vest. The NFL had nothing to do with that. And how did that ruin Mike Williams?? He still got his chance, and guess what? He sucks. Was missing that one year too damaging for him? And Kesler? Firstly, he was very good at OSU, just behind RJ Umberger in points, and was rookie of the week several times. The only reason I know is because my nephew went to OSU and played for them at the same time. Kesler has since done very little in the NHL due to injuries. The only thing he is known for is a nasty and illegal hit when he was cross-checked in the face by a Flyer(stupid flyers). He was drafted in 2003 but didn’t sign that 5 mil contract until 2007.
Fact is you still haven’t answered my initial point. How is it logical to offer untested rookies so much money? All of your arguments use what if words – “the assumption is that over the next 6 years he will contribute in a similar fashion.”, and “It isn’t out of the question that 5 years down the road Matt Ryan may be the top QB in the league”, and “probably could have started two years earlier in his career”, and ” Even if he was only 60% as good a year or two earlier in his career Willis would have been a starting NFL linebacker.”
I know its a free market system. I’m saying the system sucks. Less than half of all the QBs drafted in the first round could be considered a success. How is that good? If you came to me and said “Give me 35 million dollars and I’ll give you a 46% chance on a return on your investment. What do ya say?” What would you say? Hell that’s worse odds than roulette. It makes no sense from a business standpoint. It makes no sense from a fan’s standpoint. It even makes no sense from just a competitive standpoint. If you’re playing a game of pick-up, and you are the captain, are you gonna go with the guy that everyone knows plays well and has serious game? Or are you gonna go with the guy that happens to walk up that nobody knows?
And James signed a 12 million dollar deal as a rookie, which pales in comparison to rookie contracts in football.
by steelerark on
May 20, 2008 11:26 PM EDT
up
0 recs
You're completely wrong on Kesler..
He left OSU in the spring of 2003. Signed a standard 3 year entry level contract with the Canucks at the rookie max, which was about $1.5 million per season at that time. When that expired, he re-upped on a one year deal with the Canucks, then was signed to a huge offer sheet by Philadelphia (who had done the same with Umberger) as a restricted free agent. The Canucks matched the offer in 2007, which was actually Ryan’s THIRD NHL CONTRACT. He may have been the Canucks best all round player this past season, and is just reaching his prime at 24.
I think that you’re just as wrong about the other points you make in your post, but at least they are more subjective and arguable.
by robert ethan on
May 21, 2008 1:26 AM EDT
up
0 recs
huh? again
so rookie max is about 1.5 mill in the NHL? a lot lower than 70, no? and whats the point about his subsequent contracts? he is young and good, so are a lot of athletes, what does it have to do with the NFL rookie pay scale being outrageously high?
by tkired on
May 21, 2008 2:49 AM EDT
up
0 recs
1.5 mill per year...
3 year deal, all money gauranteed. I don’t want to throw out precise numbers, but almost all first round NHL picks get the rookie max (which was higher in 2003 – pre lockout- than it is today). I think Kesler probably earned around $4 million off his entry level contract. Probably close to the same amount on his second deal, so far. Kesler is 23, the same age as most of the players taken in this year’s NFL draft, and a hockey career generally lasts longer than a football career. He should be a regular NHL player for at least the next 10 years and his contracts will get progressively larger.
by robert ethan on
May 21, 2008 3:26 AM EDT
up
0 recs
oookay...
so how am i completely wrong? Kesler’s stats…
He played one year at OSU. Won several rookie honors. In 2003 he was drafted and signed by the Canucks and played in 28 games for a whopping 5 points. After the lockout season, he has played in 210 games missing half of the 06/07 season due to injury. In 228 games total for his career(including this season) he has 81 points, there were 18 players who scored more than 81 points this year. He had 37 points this season, tying him for 168th overall. The Canucks’ best overall player? He was 4th on the team in scoring, well behind #3, Naslund. And the huge offer that Philly offered Kesler was 1.9 mil. And the Canucks matched it on September 15th, 2006, not 2007.
So, how am I wrong? Did I ever say he didn’t have promise? No, I believe that he has potential. Has he done anything yet in the NHL? Nope. Don’t get me wrong, 37 points isn’t terrible. But after 4 seasons, you’d think the number 23 overall pick would have a little more to show for himself. What I said was that he is best known for that cross-check. Sorry bro, but he has not done squat in the NHL yet.
The only reason there was any talk about that contract at all at the time was that Bob Clarke, Philly GM at the time, was criticized for going after an RFA, something that just doesn’t happen very often in hockey. The Canucks had planned to offer him a 2 year tender paying him 900K the first year, and 1mil the second. Philly forced their hand. Before Kesler’s offer sheet, the last offer sheet to an RFA in the NHL was in 1998 when Carolina offered Federov 28 million. That’s a huge offer.
http://www.tsn.ca/nhl/story/?id=177269
If you are going to say someone’s argument isn’t “subjective and arguable”, back it up.
by steelerark on
May 21, 2008 2:56 AM EDT
up
0 recs
btw
check out that cross-check on you tube…
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8-Y3×0mr_Ik
Kesler is laid out by Jesse Boulerice, a typical Flyers goon, in a game when the Flyers had a 7-2 lead late in the 3rd period. Boulerice was suspended 25 games and later released. I F@!#ing HATE THE FLYERS.
by steelerark on
May 21, 2008 3:08 AM EDT
up
0 recs
Kesler wasn't drafted to be a big scorer..
He is a tough two way player with great skating ability, good size, and exceptional work ethic. He will be the captain in Vancouver soon enough. You don’t just judge a hockey player by his scoring stats, although Kesler’s will improve as his career develops. He earned over 4 million dollars off of his first contract, and I think is earning about 2 million per on his current deal. Probably has made over $8 million since leaving OSU, and his biggest earning potential is ahead. He is only 1 year older than Matt Ryan.
Kesler had a good freshman season with the Buckeyes, (obviously, since he was taken in the first round of the NHL entry draft), but it wasn’t as good, comparatively speaking as Maurice Clarett’s freshman season. You scoff at the money Kesler has made to this point, but hockey is miniscule compared to football in terms of revenue. At 23 he has made more than all but a very few NFL players of the same age, and infinitely more than the $300,000 or whatever Mo Clarett got as the last player taken in the third round of the 2005 draft.
by robert ethan on
May 21, 2008 3:19 AM EDT
up
0 recs
Not sure about basketball...
...but I know that all hockey contracts are gauranteed for the length of the contract. Whatever Crosby signed for as a rookie he was going to take to the bank regardless of whether or not he ever played a game in the league. The cap for a three year entry level contract in the NHL is around $5 million now, I think. But I think that Crosby made close to $10 million his first year alone, with all of the bonus clauses included.
by robert ethan on May 20, 2008 8:43 PM EDT 0 recs
So ryan plays for 6 years then retires….he is set for life.
by Bereadawg on May 21, 2008 1:06 AM EDT 0 recs
been curious for awhile now,
how do you pronounce your screen name? You are a Browns fan, right? I assume the dawg is for that. Just wondered :)
by steelerark on
May 21, 2008 3:00 AM EDT
up
0 recs
Alternative title for this post:
Why the Falcons will be a crappy team for the next decade.
$72 Million over 6 years for a QB who’s never played in an NFL Game. $35 million over 6 years for a running back who’s never been a regular starter (Michael Turner). That’s essentially one sixth of their salary cap for the next six years spent on two unproven players.
Let’s be realistic; they’re definitely going to continue sucking this year and they’ll end up with another really high draft pick. Can they really afford to sign ANOTHER top-five pick to a $50 million/6 year contract? Can they even afford to pay for the rest of their team? Or, more importantly, will they be able to afford to seriously rebuild their team in the next few years?
Could it be that they’re planning on a year with no salary cap and they’ll restructure the contract to pay out almost all of it then?
by HinesField on May 21, 2008 9:22 AM EDT 0 recs
Unbelievable!
What a crappy couple of days! I was too busy to really check in, and this maelstrom breaks here. Then my power goes out from a storm last night, so I couldn’t jump into the fray!
So, anyway, I’m driving home from work last night, and I hear this news of how the Falcons signed Matt Ryan to a 6 year, $72M deal with $34M guaranteed. And the guys on the radio are hailing it as a great day for the Falcons! They say this is awesome, because now they’ll have everyone in camp on time, and the team will be in much better shape because of it.
So, I’m thinking, “Isn’t that more than Jake Long got at the number 1 pick?” This sounds more like Arthur Blank letting it be known that he really wanted Peerless Price than the approach that good teams take. The Falcons probably could have had Peerless as a FA, but Blank made it clear he wanted Price, so the Bills extort a draft pick from the Falcons. If I’m a Falcons fan (and I am, sort of), I’m not happy with this at all. How do you rationalize overpaying for rookie. This is a player that should be smart enough to be reasonable. There is no way they should have paid so much for him, just to get him into camp early. This is the kind of move that bad teams make not good teams. You think the Colts, Pats, Steelers, or Chargers are doing something like this? I just don’t see it.
Anyway, that’s my rant (probably not so well thought out), but I obviously agree with everyone here, except apparently robert ethan.
I will say that I thought the Michael Turner signing was a good move for the Falcons. He’s never been a starter, but he’s played enough the last few years to at least think he can make a move as a feature back. Let me put it this way. We’ve seen Turner play a lot more than we saw Matt Schaub play before the Texans traded for him.
by WolfpackSteelersFan on May 21, 2008 1:45 PM EDT 0 recs
I still don't understand
his arguments for the pros of this contract which somehow have devolved into hockey and paying college athletes. I’m done arguing about a mediocre centre for a middle of the pack NHL team. As for Turner, I can at least see going after him, since every time he touched the ball, he seemed to excel, and he has already played in the NFL for years. Just because he hasn’t started yet, doesn’t mean much to me. However, I do feel like they paid starter money for someone that wasn’t a starter, and I disagree with that, but this Ryan thing is a much bigger problem.
What I challenge Robert or any other person who, inexplicably, is for large rookie contracts is this: Prove how this is a sound financial choice. I have given stats that back up the idiocy of moves like this. Less than half of all 1st round QBs fail. Most of the folks had nothing but praise for Ryan Leaf when he was coming out. No one ever dreamed he would fail so spectacularly. But he did. The draft room floor is littered with such examples of QBs that were highly touted and failed badly.
Again, I will give you numbers. There have been 11 QBs drafted in the top 3 in the last ten years. Of those 11, only 5 start for their team – Vince Young, Eli, Peyton, Alex Smith and Palmer. Smith and VY are not anywhere close to being elite.
2 of those 11 are backups and definitely considered busts, Carr and Harrington.
4 are completely out of the league – Akili Smith, Couch, Leaf and of course Vick, who is sitting in jail.
Show me a business, any other business at all, that would look at a past history like this and think it a wise business investment. Even highly recruited law students don’t come into a firm making as much as a partner. So prove it. Don’t give me conjecture or your opinion. Don’t tell me maybes and probablys. Prove it. Fact is, you can’t. The NFL is unique in that they give untested, untried young men tens of millions of dollars on the chance that they will excel, when less than half of them ever do.
Oh, and to clear up one more point… Clarett was offered 430K by the Broncos. In true Clarett form he declined, and instead worked out and signed a deal that would have paid him 7million including incentives over 4 years. He of course, blew it. That’s 7 million, not 300K.
by steelerark on May 21, 2008 3:10 PM EDT 1 recs
Basically all I'm trying to say...
...is that top football prospects have to wait a few years longer to start earning their living on the field, and since they are handicapped in that manner, probably deserve larger contracts when they get there.
The Kesler example was to compare with Clarett originally, since both were athletes at Ohio State at the time Clarett challenged the rule. But if you want to compare Kesler to Ryan, they are both 23 years old, and as we’ve tortuously established, Ryan (the Kesler) has been playing as a pro for the past 7 years, and earned somewhere in the neighbourhood of $8 million already. In the bank, invested, accruing interest. Ryan (the Matt) only earns his first paycheck starting this week sometime, or however they work it.
Definitely it is a obscene amount of money, but if you go down that road, the same applies to most athletes playing professional sport for a living at the top level. Then you move on to why George Clooney needs to be paid $30 million for a couple of months work pretending he is someone else? Or why some Wall Street broker deserves a $40 million dollar year end dividend because of fluctuations in the stock market. Google is great, but do a couple of computer geeks not long out of college deserve to be paid $60 billion for the idea? After awhile it’s just numbers. Presumably the people who own and manage the franchises analyze the numbers far enough into the future to determine that yes, it is worth our while to gamble $34 million on this guy.
by robert ethan on
May 21, 2008 3:49 PM EDT
up
0 recs
You may have some point
but the bottom line is that good teams do not have deals like this. They may (slightly) overpay market value for players that have proven to be good contributors and have also shown character and leadership qualities. They don’t shell out more money than the player drafted higher in a gamble on players that have yet to take a snap in the NFL.
Other sports, or what a movie star makes for a movie are not really applicable to this situation. It’s an apples and oranges comparison.
by WolfpackSteelersFan on
May 21, 2008 3:59 PM EDT
up
0 recs
We definitely
agree there about the state of sports contracts as a whole. I actually laughed out loud at the word tortorously. Hehe. I realize Robert that I have come off way too strong in my arguments. I apologize if at any time I sounded condescending or rude. This is an issue that cuts me deep, meaning pro salaries, in that I am unfortunately a Pirates fan, and the escalating costs of players has really damaged the Pirates and baseball as a whole. I have realized that I was taking it a little too personally. So I really do apologize to ya man.
by steelerark on
May 21, 2008 4:23 PM EDT
up
0 recs
its all good
I don’t think anybody’s been out of line. Y’all have both talked past each other a bit, but both have had interesting and legit points. Some mroe relevant to the disucssion at hand than others, but whatevs. Interesting to read from where I’m sitting.
Cheers to you both.
by Blitzburgh on
May 21, 2008 4:40 PM EDT
up
0 recs
yeah
i would agree, they both had points, but about slightly different topics, thus the confusion.
by tkired on
May 21, 2008 6:10 PM EDT
up
0 recs
indeed I do
But I lived in CA on the beach for a few years awhile back.
by Blitzburgh on
May 21, 2008 5:55 PM EDT
up
0 recs
nice
You snag snag yourself a little Cali chick and take back to Tejas?
by steelerark on May 21, 2008 6:07 PM EDT 0 recs
hehe, didn't bring her back to Texas with me
Had all the fun I needed/could handle before leaving town.
by Blitzburgh on
May 21, 2008 6:13 PM EDT
up
0 recs







