Behind the Steel Curtain: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:





Datruth4life's Thoughts on Steelers Roster Heading Into OTAs

Many of you know I'm quite fond of datruth4life's football insights and writing style. His thoughts are always very prescient and entertaining. Here are his latest, taken from the comments section of a previous thread. In case you didn't catch them, here they are. Enjoy and discuss. - Blitz-

datruth4life:

- All of you who think the Steelers will have a $7M tackle sitting the bench also believe gas will be back to $1.99 this summer. IT AIN’T HAPPENING. Max Starks will be a starter this year. It’d be too much egg on the face of a very conservative front office for the second highest paid player on your team to warm the bench. In typical Steelers fashion, the front office will continue to try and work out a long-term deal with Starks in training camp. With K. Simmons just recently having shoulder surgery, I think that will mean that Colon will get a few more looks at RG in the OTAs and training camp. Before all is said and done, I think the starting five left to right will be: Smith, Chris K., Hartwig, Colon, Starks. At least that is what Ben hopes, for his safety’s sake.

- Jeremy Bloom could very well make this team if he can show that he can play the slot as well as return kickoffs and punts. Remember, this team this past year kept 5 WRs and a returner, who couldn’t play another position in Rossum. With 4 WRs being active on game day, Bloom could ideally give the team 5 WRs on game day if he can make the squad and impress as a kick returner. He can only help himself if he can show that he can tackle someone as well this summer in Latrobe.

- And since you are asking about my top 5 WRs (I could hear your brain cells churning), here is my 5 WRs to make the team: H. Ward, Holmes, N. Washington, Limas Sweed and Micah Rucker. Nate will be gone next year and Ward’s time is winding down. Rucker could step in next year and be an upgrade over Washington as the 3rd WR and Sweed will eventually take Ward’s spot. Santonio is not that far away from being a no. 1 WR.

- As you may have noticed, DaTruth didn’t utter a word about Willie Reid. Nor will he say anything about Najeh and his $1M salary for next year. Tomlin will speak for Datruth when he shows both of them the curb in late August. Best case scenario is that the Steelers can get a late round pick for Reid. Teams aren’t going to give up anything for Dookie. Nice to have known you, Dookie. Don’t drop anything (er, literally) on your way out of town.

- For all of you who want to move James Harrison to ILB, why? He’s an ALL-PRO ROLB. Leave him there. Let Bruce Davis learn behind him and OLB Andre Frazier can back up Lamarr Woodley at LOLB. One of the keys to this defense playing at a high level this whole year is giving time early on to some of the younger players and backups. Woodley and Harrison cannot play every snap at their demanding positions and still bring the same type of heat on the pass rush in late December as they would in early September. And this is even more critical for our DL, who I think will have a Booger right under their nose (and in a Steelers uni) before training camp.

- And by the way, that Bus that just rolled over Najeh is named Gary Russell, who everyone has forgotten because of the euphoria in landing Mendenhall. DaTruth says right here that G. Russell is the best short yardage back on this team. He’s put on 10 lbs and is up to 225 lbs, about the same size as Mendenhall. A backfield of Fast Willie, the rookie, G. Russell, M. Moore and Carey Davis isn’t bad at all. What helps is that Moore, Russell and Davis all can play special teams. ROSTER FLE-XI-BIL-I-TY as your young coach likes to say.

- I don’t know anything about the rookie free agent DLs that the Steelers signed, but if any of them show a pulse or a hint that they can play, they can win a roster spot. Kirschke and Eason aren’t giving the DaTruth a lot of confidence if any of the big 3 goes down. Steely McBean hasn’t shown anything as of yet. K. Colbert really needs to pick up that Booger that’s available. And also, I am the only one a bit concerned that A. Smith still isn’t doing yet on the field as he rehabs that surgically repaired bicep? Besides Ben, that might be the most important arm on the team this year.

- I think that 5th cornerback spot is up for grabs to the best special teamer. The two rookie free agents only have to show that they can make a special teams tackle to beat out the little guy from Alabama, Madison. Yeah, I know he ran down Joshua Cribbs and made another tackle on someone else to save a touchdown in another game, but isn’t his job, and that of the rest of the coverage units, to make the tackle on the other side of the 50 yard line?

- It’s put up or shut up (and ship out time) for Bryan McFadden. He’s hired Rosenhaus as his agent, which doesn’t mean anything if he doesn’t show something on the field. He HAS to beat out Deshea this year if he wants his pay day. I think B-Mac is ready to take that next step. If he does, he could have just as much an impact on this being a top 3 defense as does L. Woodley (mark him down for 13 sacks this year).

- Having Aaron Smith and Ryan Clark back and healthy (we hope with both fingers crossed) will go along way to helping Tomlin “dream ridiculously.” Two good solid football players who will never get the ink or props from Steelers Nation that they deserve.

- Hey Blitz, keep it coming. Steelers Nation, Be blessed!

1 recs | Comment 59 comments

Story-email Email | Print |

Comments

Display:

russell

If Gary makes the team, would Davis be cut?

by Blitzburgh on May 22, 2008 12:19 PM EDT   0 recs

Comments

Thanks for posting datruth. Don’t always agree but you do know your football.

1. Agree about Starks. I think he was better than Colon last year but Colon played because of other issues. Starks proved himself with his play later in the season when injuries came. He’s not a Pro Bowler and he’s not worth 7 million but he’s a starter with this roster.
2. Agree about Reid being gone but only if someone steps up. Also, will anyone give the Steelers draft picks for him? If J Taylor is worth a 4th rounder how is Reid worth the price of a java? I think Ward, Holmes, Washington, Sweed and someone will be the 5. Out of Reid, Baker, Trannon and everyone else at WR someone will emerge.
3. Harrison is a Pro Bowl LB on the outside where the Steelers have no depth. Agree that there is no way he is moving inside unless Davis shows to be a stud. Davis is still in classes and will not see the field much in 08 because it is a complicated Defense and he is already behind.
4. Agree that Dookie is gone. FWP, Mendenhall, Davis, Moore and Russell will be kept. Russell is a player. This needs to be said though because many disparage Dookie on this site. (Love the nickname & the story!) Najey Davenport is a good football player. He plays special teams. He picks up the blitz. He makes plays in the passing game. When he has been needed he has stepped in and produced hundred yard games in both Green Bay and Pittsburgh. He will be a quality addition to Whiz in AZ or some other NFL team. He just was never a special one of a kind back. And we never got him to be that for us. Thanks for the good play Najey!
5. I’m still very worried about the D and O lines. I am excited about the draft picks they got. I agree with not reaching for a need. They did NOTHING to address the DL and very little to address the OL. An FA DL that can step up will make this team.
6. Based on the talent I see at DB I disagree with you regarding Anthony Madison. He is an undersized corner who has shown ability in limited play over the last couple years. You sight several special teams plays he made last year on a horrible ST unit. How could he NOT make the team? I say he will be on the 53.
7. B Mac needs tpo beat out Townsend or he is gone and a DB will be chosen high next year. Aaron Smith and Ryan Clark ARE solid good football players who if healthy will strengthen the Steelers D unit next year.

When You Run The Ball Good Things Happen

by 5020 on May 22, 2008 12:59 PM EDT   0 recs

Question

Will you expound on your thought that Starks was better than Colon last year but Colon “played because of other reasons?” That makes me real curious. It doesn’t bode well when a better player doesn’t play because of ANY reason. Thanks.

by maryrose on May 22, 2008 2:13 PM EDT to parent up   0 recs

If I can speak for 5020

I think he was talking about the ‘Curtain Conspiracy’ that Starks lost the job b/c they wanted to keep his free agent value down while also getting a look at a youngster (Colon). I could be wrong, but that was my guess….right/wrong 5020?

by cgolden on May 22, 2008 2:18 PM EDT to parent up   0 recs

Right On

When You Run The Ball Good Things Happen

by 5020 on May 22, 2008 3:02 PM EDT to parent up   0 recs

except

if we pay him 7 million this year, did that really work? he’ll be a UFA again at the end of this season, and if he starts this year and does well, then his value will be up again regardless…

by TheMostViolentTeam on May 22, 2008 3:03 PM EDT to parent up   0 recs

Not saying

if it worked or not. I’m just saying that’s what I think they did last year. After the line played so terribly last year they had to transition Max while they talked to FA and went about the draft. Then they didn’t draft anybody. So they still have an over paid lame duck Starks. But they have a lot of good stuff around that scenario and can contend for a championship THIS year. If they can get some better line play that could help get them to the next round.

When You Run The Ball Good Things Happen

by 5020 on May 22, 2008 3:08 PM EDT to parent up   0 recs

true

i wasn’t disagreeing, as i myself asserted a few times i thought Starks benching was a front-office ploy to keep his value down, just seemed we didnt play it out exactly right this past off-season. of course if a long term deal gets done and he becomes starting RT for the future, changes the colors of the picture a bit.

by TheMostViolentTeam on May 22, 2008 4:23 PM EDT to parent up   0 recs

Dookie +1

Yeah… I also think that Dookie has done a good job filling a necessary roll for us these past two years. He had large Bettis sized shoes to fill and obviously could not do that. But what he did do was pick up lot’s of third down conversions and more than a few blitzes that could have resulted in even more pummeling of Big Ben.

by Chicago Steeler on May 23, 2008 10:12 AM EDT to parent up   0 recs

Great Comments

Trading Reid for a late pick may be a good idea, since he may be a decent #3 somewhere else, but he’s never going to see the field here. I think Dallas Baker will beat out a guy like Rucker for the #5, but Rucker looks like a solid PS guy to me. Baker was in a similar circumstance last year, but has come on strong this off-season. You’re right on about BMac, and probably Silverback as well. When we have capable players that will be sitting on the bench, it’s easy to be antsy to see them play, but depth is a good thing. Silverback probably has the flexibility to move inside, but if Davis is a situational pass rusher who fills in well for injuries for a few years, that’s not a bad thing. I think some of us are just trying to figure out the future of Farrior’s SILB spot while justifying the drafting of another OLB when we have 2 good starters already.

by BadMaafala on May 22, 2008 1:22 PM EDT   0 recs

agreed

when I was discussing Harrison possibly moving to ILB (thats also if we don’t draft or pick up a FA to replace Farrior), i was assuming we were under the pretenses that this was a year or two away, if/when Farrior fades. didn’t Levon Kirkland move from outside to inside, or vice versa at one point because of Greg Lloyd being injured?

by TheMostViolentTeam on May 22, 2008 1:35 PM EDT   0 recs

Good post. I’ll believe that Colon will be moved to guard when I see it. It seems like every report written about the Steelers OL includes the “Colon, who many see as a guard…” line and then nothing happens.

I also don’t think that Rucker will beat out Baker/Reid. All reports show that Baker has been much improved over last year. I agree that Reid will be cut, and no, they can’t get anything from him in a trade. A 3rd round draft choice who has done nothing at all in the NFL isn’t going to fetch any draft pick at all.

And just say no to moving Harrison inside. The guy was pretty good last year at his position.

by Cols714 on May 22, 2008 2:08 PM EDT   0 recs

Good to see you Truth

RB Depth – Russell may very well make the team and Dookie’s already gone in my mind, but Russell’s role will be the same as it was last year (inactive on game days). He may have skills but theres no way he takes carries away from FWP, RM or Moore. He’s just the product of a bad off season for him, two guys got added to the depth chart ahead of him.
WR Depth – I don’t know who the 5th WR will end up being but if reports out of OTA’s can be trusted (which they probably can’t), it sure sounds like Dallas Baker is making some strides. I agree though, it probably won’t be Reid. I don’t know why a team would give up anything for a guy who’s only managed to dress for 7 games in two seasons.
LB – As far as Harrison moving inside, that talk was centered around the 2009 season assuming Farrior is gone. Obviously that would center around the kid from UCLA being ready to play by then.

by cgolden on May 22, 2008 2:09 PM EDT   0 recs

a top three D

Nice post,

I suspect you are right about Starks. If were a betting man, the unit you see along the Oline is the five I would take. I also see a big year ahead for L. Wood and the gang. That is going to be one hell of a LB corps.

by feworker on May 22, 2008 2:21 PM EDT   0 recs

Just a hunch...

I mean (#) 1 HELLAVA D.

by feworker on May 22, 2008 6:03 PM EDT to parent up   0 recs

A good effort dat...

Well written and entertaining. The only editing required will be for factual errors.

1. Max Starks will start because he is the best RT on the team, when he is healthy and fit.

2. Jeremy Bloom will only ever work for the team as a sales rep.

3. Top 5 are Holmes, Ward, Washington, Baker, Sweed.

4. Najeh Davenport will play a hybrid fullback role, Gary Russell stays, Carey Davis goes.

5. Mike Humpal will be the team’s third best ILB this season, and eventually replace Farrior.

6. Doug Legursky among the free agents will stick this year. Kyle Clement further down the road, perhaps. Mike Lorello from the past returns this year. Ryan Clark will be soon gone for physical reasons, I think.

7. McFadden is fine. You don’t give enough credit to Townsend, in assuming that he still plays only because McFadden isn’t very good.

So, if you could be so kind as to resubmit the piece with the appropriate corrections I’m sure it will be more than satisfactory. Keep up the good work!

by robert ethan on May 22, 2008 3:44 PM EDT   0 recs

point #7

so true. Townsend was fantastic last year. he was one of the best, if not the best #2 CB in the league, and his YPA numbers were in the “elite” range. (from KC Joyner a few weeks ago).

by TheMostViolentTeam on May 22, 2008 4:24 PM EDT to parent up   0 recs

yall both missed the point

Datruth was saying that if BMac wants his PAYDAY, he better beat out Deshea. You’re not going to get huge bucks if you cant beat out 30+ year old #2 corners, even if they are very solid ones like Deshea.

by Blitzburgh on May 22, 2008 4:28 PM EDT to parent up   0 recs

agreed.

i did miss that. i was more saying it doesn’t mean he isn’t a good corner because he can’t beat Deshea. there actually is value for the Steelers if he can’t beat him, but it’s close, because then we know he is a solid corner, but he won’t get a huge contract offer from some other team in the league. we could re-sign him for cheap in this scenario and be set. be better for the Steelers if Townsend stays at his high level and McFadden plays at the same level, but can’t quite unseat him. keeping his value down.

by TheMostViolentTeam on May 22, 2008 5:38 PM EDT to parent up   0 recs

Ryan Clark

Why would Ryan Clark be gone? Every report has him a totally healthy.

by Cols714 on May 22, 2008 4:03 PM EDT   0 recs

Clark isnt going anywhere

He’s recovering nicely and there’s no way we go into this season relying on any of those undrafted free agent rookie safetys. We saw what happened when we had to rely on Carter and An. Smith. Clark’s on this team at least through 2008, and hopefully longer.

by Blitzburgh on May 22, 2008 4:08 PM EDT to parent up   0 recs

Clark is a great guy...

...but he has never played more than 13 games in a season in his career. No one gives a better effort, but in terms of talent, Ryan just hangs on, and has to have everything going right for him in order to start in the NFL. He went undrafted, has been on waivers a couple of times, and has a history of injuries, big and small. He has to go all out, all the time, in order to hold his position, and that results in more injuries.

Mike Lorello is the same player, with a bit more bulk, who is a few years younger and has no health problems. Anthony Smith, for all the flack he took over the Patriot comment, is a better player than Clark even if Ryan is fully recovered. Polamalu and Smith will be the starters, and I think they will opt to go with Lorello, and possibly Mundy, as the backups.

by robert ethan on May 22, 2008 4:51 PM EDT to parent up   0 recs

some good points

I agree with lots of what you’re saying, but if Polamalu is playing at 100% and healthy, I want Clark next to him. He takes great angles to the ball, rarely misses tackles. Just a reliable, heady player. An. Smith is very talented, agree with you there, but he still doesn’t have the same savy instincts of where to be on the field as Clark. If there’s no Troy P, I wouldnt mind seeing the younger, more athletic safetys out there over Clark, but there’s no way to know. That’s why I think he’ll be on the squad in 2008.

by Blitzburgh on May 22, 2008 4:57 PM EDT to parent up   0 recs

Smith doesn't have the coverage

skills that Clark has. Two coverage-poor safeties on the field at the same time (Polamalu and Smith) is a disaser wating to happen.

by Desroko on May 22, 2008 8:02 PM EDT to parent up   0 recs

We did see what happened

When we had to rely on Carter and Smitty, we saw some of our best pass defense in years. Our pass defense completely stopped both Chad Johnson and Housh, and then we played one of the best passing offenses of all times. Call me skeptical, but I don’t think Clark and Polamalu were stopping Tom Brady and Randy Moss without much of a pass rush.

Anthony Smith and Bryant McFadden, along with Woodley, are the three reasons to be excited about the Steelers defense in coming years. I don’t disagree with DaTruth’s comments that this is the year B-Mac has to step up, but the reply that we’re picking corner high if he doesn’t start this year is crazy.

by buddytoledo on May 25, 2008 4:32 PM EDT to parent up   0 recs

...meant to be light hearted and tongue in cheek, Blitz.

“Sarcasm” has such negative negative connotations.

by robert ethan on May 22, 2008 4:40 PM EDT   0 recs

Ryan Clark is not just barely hanging on in terms of talent

What? Ryan Clark has played very well the past 2 years for the Steelers. Just because a guy isn’t a highly touted draft pick does not mean that he is barely hanging on in terms of talent. I thought that Anthony Smith was going to beat him out, but he couldn’t and the defense was much better with Clark in the lineup than without.

by Cols714 on May 22, 2008 5:36 PM EDT   0 recs

When a player goes undrafted

..then claws his way onto a practice squad for a year, then claws his way up to special teams duty in another year, then takes over a starting spot due to two players ahead of him being injured, then is released when his team goes out and finds an expensive free agent to replace him, I would say that constitues a marginal talent. Which also speaks to Clark’s character and fortitude in being over to deal with all of those obstacles. But he needs to be fully healthy in order to play the style he plays, and that becomes progressively harder to do. I think he is around 30 now, and the injuries will only get worse.

by robert ethan on May 22, 2008 6:16 PM EDT to parent up   0 recs

Wait a second. Ryan Clark comes to the Steelers, wins the starting FS job and plays pretty well. The next year, the Steelers anticipate Anthony Smith winning the starting job, but it doesn’t come to pass because Ryan Clark simply outplays him. He has a solid season, but misses a good portion of the season due to having his spleen removed. The Steelers struggle for the rest of the season to find a replacement FS, including highly touted 3rd round pick, Anthony Smith. BTW, I was hoping that Smith would win the starting job last year because I though Clark was expendable, last season sorta disproved that theory.

He’ll be 29 in October and didn’t miss games last year because of injury because he played too hard, rather he had his spleen removed. I’m not so sure that this makes him injury prone.

Also, being undrafted and “clawing” your way to a starting position does not necessarily mean a lack of talent. See Willie Parker, Dan Kreider, James Harrison, etc.

by Cols714 on May 22, 2008 6:29 PM EDT to parent up   0 recs

...I didn't think that Smith was especially "highly rated"..

He was a late 3rd round pick who wasn’t considered one of the elite safety prospects in the 2006 draft. Still, he has started 14 games in his first two seasons, which is better than average for his draft position. Players often break out in their third year, and Smith’s errors were errors of enthusiasm, which are the kind you overcome with experience. But I wasn’t saying that Smith will play ahead of Clark because he is better necessarily, I just don’t think that Clark is physically up to the task. Clark became a starter in Washington because the two guys ahead of him broke down, not because he was better than them at the time. The same situation exists in Pitt. Smith will start because Clark is nicked up a lot and Carter is too small to play the spot full time. Once they settle on Smith as the starter, they have to decide on backups. With backups, younger, cheaper, players with upside have the advantage. I could easily see both Clark and Carter being released leaving Polomalu, Smith, Lorello and Mundy at the position. Lorello has been around the team for a couple of years so I imagine he knows the playbook well, and would be confident enough to step in if he had to. Mundy would likely be groomed for later.

by robert ethan on May 22, 2008 7:58 PM EDT to parent up   0 recs

Clark will not be cut this year

Sorry, there is no way that Clark will be released this year, unless he is unable to play due to the spleen problem.

by Cols714 on May 22, 2008 11:04 PM EDT to parent up   0 recs

"unable to play" is a subjective thing....

Unable to play up to his previous standards (at least) would be more accurate. There are all sorts of football players playing with various performance affecting handicaps, and many more who have failed physicals and been released who feel they can still play. It isn’t often that a single injury ends a players career on the spot. It is usually the cumulative loss of effectiveness from losing a fraction of their athleticism here and a fraction there. Ryan Clark was awfully close to the edge in that regard prior to his latest surgery, inactivity, and recuperration period. Terry Bradshaw or Joe Greene are probably still “able to play” in the strictess sense of the term.

by robert ethan on May 23, 2008 12:37 AM EDT to parent up   0 recs

“Ryan Clark was awfully close to the edge in that regard prior to his latest surgery…”

If I recall, he beat out Anthony Smith in training camp, despite the fact that the Steelers (and I) wanted Smith to win the job. At the time of his injury, he was not in danger of getting benched at all. Where are you coming up with this stuff?

by Cols714 on May 23, 2008 11:08 AM EDT to parent up   0 recs

Clark Is Talented

The Steelers were a better D last year with Ryan Clark on the field. An Smith is young and mouthy but hits like a freight train. Smith was a lot better in the teams nickle and dime D than as a starter (NE Jax) That said perhaps Smith has improved this off season. I was high on him before his talk without walk last year against the Pats*
The worrisome issue with Clark is that safety in the NFL is grueling and hazardous. 27 is now sans spleen and gall bladder. That CAN’T be good regardless of what team doc’s say. I would predict that he will start if healthy, not play all 16 and that the Steelers will be need help at this position if Anthony Smith does not take it up a notch.

When You Run The Ball Good Things Happen

by 5020 on May 22, 2008 6:34 PM EDT   0 recs

Correction

25 (Ryan Clark) not 27 (An Smith) is without spleen and gall bladder.

When You Run The Ball Good Things Happen

by 5020 on May 22, 2008 6:36 PM EDT to parent up   0 recs

And just so I’m clear, Smith is also very talented, and the Steelers have to hope that he shows he can take over the starting FS if Clark is injured or is ineffective. But based on their play from a year ago, Clark is clearly the better player at this point.

by Cols714 on May 22, 2008 6:42 PM EDT   0 recs

I'l have to dig up the game reports,

but the number of pass plays that went for 20+ yards sky-rocketed after Clark went down.

by Desroko on May 22, 2008 8:05 PM EDT   0 recs

Gary Russell and Jeremy Bloom

Gary Russell will be a contributor he played on the same team as the dallas cowboys numbero uno back and the numbeo uno back for the pats he just screwed up in school and Jeremy Bloom will
EVENTUALLY be the number 2 or 3 receiver he will make a good slot receiver he has good hands,good strength for 180 pounds, passion and intelligence for the position and fearless. I think the steelers will have the best running backs combined in the league this yr my concern is the cornerbacks

by Johninne on May 23, 2008 12:26 AM EDT   0 recs

Yeah, Russell had nearly as big a sophomore season as Mendenhall's junior year..

He is about the same size, and has a lot of the same skills. Able to run the ball inside, take it outside, catch passes out of the backfield, and block if necessary. He is still younger than any of the new players the team brought in this year except for Mendenhall, as well. A lot of fans were concerned about bringing Mendenhall into a lineup that already had Willie Parker, I was more concerned about bringing him into a lineup that already had Gary Russell.

But I don’t share your optimism about Bloom. The guy is about 26 years old, has played very little football over the past few years, and was strictly a one dimensional kick returner when he did play. He has a slim chance to stick as a return specialist, but I think there are other more versatile players on the roster who can do that just as well.

by robert ethan on May 23, 2008 12:48 AM EDT to parent up   0 recs

Thanks for the Feedback

Guys,

Great responses to my post. If there’s anything that the DaTruth loves is to hear the truth from other people’s perspectives. Here are some further follow-up thoughts:

- I don’t think that Najeh will beat out Carey Davis because Davis is much cheaper and is a better special teams player (kickoffs and punts). I never said that Najeh wasn’t a good player. The Steelers just aren’t going to pay a 4th string tailback approaching 30 years old $1M next year. If he doesn’t get picked up and the Steelers have an injury, they can always go back and pick him up, ala Verron Hayes. I think that Moore will probably take on the role that Najeh had last year. DaTruth has always been a big Gary Russell proponent, and I bet the rest of SN and the league will see why before this year is out.

- DaTruth takes nothing away from Deshea Townsend and his play this past year. He had a solid year. But I think this defense needs to have Bryant McFadden in that starting lineup if it wants to go to the next level. McFadden still has a ton of talent. He’s physical, plays the ball pretty well and actually has decent hands (the anti-Ike). I think Deshea would be more effective as a nickle corner playing the slot. However, with the way the league is now, you need 3 starting caliber corners anyway. I saw a statistic where a team’s nickle defense is on the field now about 60 percent of the time, anyway. That sounds about right for this year’s team because the offense is going to put up a ton of points.

- Jeremy Bloom hasn’t done it in the NFL. DaTruth will give you that. He doesn’t have to be Joshua Cribbs to make this team though. If he shows good hands as a returner along with some of that quickness and burst that he had at Colorado, he can make this team. The only returner that they have is M. Moore, and he is more effective returning punts than kickoffs. Plus, I don’t want Santonio back there catching punts. Let him concentrate on trying to be an all-pro WR.

- DaTruth just doesn’t buy all of the noise out of OTAs and on this board about Baker claiming that 5th WR spot. Everyone looks good in shorts and can catch the ball when no one is hitting them. For all of Baker’s ability, he’s still a 4.7 WR on a good day. The reason why Rucker is so intriguing is that he is a 4.47 guy at 6’6’’, 221-lbs, with a MAJOR chip on his shoulders for not being drafted. He even said himself that he put up better numbers at his Pro Day than any WR in this draft (by the way, he benched 225-lb, 20 times). I checked them, and he isn’t that far off. People who have seen him play said that he has good speed for a big guy and can track the deep ball. If he can show decent hands and can grasp the offense, no way will he last on the practice squad. I predict he will be this year’s Gary Russell, a player who the team will essentially redshirt for a year with the hopes of getting him ready for bigger things the following year.

- Max Starks is just an interesting case. Did they overpay out of fear because they didn’t want to lose Faneca and Starks in one year, or do they really think he has some long-term potential as the team’s right tackle and potentially as a LT. It will be interesting to see how this develops this year.

- Dale Lolley recently mentioned that he thinks this team could be good, but that he is a little worried about the age on this defense. DaTruth’s biggest worry is another injury to the top 3 on the DL. If you add Woodley, Timmons, McFadden as starters with the return of Ryan Clark and a healthy A. Smith, this defense should be better than this past year. I also think a maturing William Gay will be a good asset to this defense in case any of the top 3 corners go down. I think the pass rush will be improved with Woodley starting and B. Davis and A. Frazier getting some situational reps. I just don’t know about the DL depth.

- People need to stop with the Ryan Clark and Anthony Smith back and forth. Clark is the better football player and starter right now. A. Smith has to work on and step up his game to take the job. The most important job for the Steeler’s free safety is to play the 3-deep position and keep the ball in front of him at all costs. Clark does that routinely. Anthony Smith has a little too much Rod Woodson in him right now, meaning he’s going to bite on everything that comes his way. You can get away with that as a strong safety. No as a last line of defense FS. I look for Mundy to win the backup FS job with A. Smith being the 3rd safety who’ll be a starter in a pinch if either Clark or Polamula goes down.

- I think the Steelers this year will officially be under the radar. That’s a good thing because this team plays better when it has a chip on its shoulders. I’m interested to see how Tomlin handles the special teams issues. There are at least 3 to 4 jobs that can be won on this roster purely with special teams.

- Lastly, thank you all for your great comments. DaTruth believes in knowledge and always enjoying sharing and receiving with Steelers Nation. What up, Blitz! Be blessed, all.

by datruth4life on May 23, 2008 9:52 AM EDT   1 recs

C. Davis or Najeh?

And also, who would you guys keep, a C. Davis as your lone FB or Najeh to play a hybrid FB/RB role. I might be inclined to keep the better blocker and special teams tackler (C. Davis) over the more all around talented Najeh.

This conversation has come up because, DaTruth believes, there is no way that they are cutting G. Russell.

Who would you guys keep?

by datruth4life on May 23, 2008 12:24 PM EDT   0 recs

We haven't cut Najeh yet?

I thought he was already auditioning for other teams (or maybe that was just wishful thinking).....

by cgolden on May 23, 2008 1:04 PM EDT to parent up   0 recs

Always a pleasure, datruth

Had some computer problems yesterday so I couldn’t post a series of questions and quibbles I had with your initial post, but your follow-up covered most of them.

In terms of the Davis v. Najeh question, the determining issue will probably money. Paying too much to get too little from Najeh. If he’s not dominent, i.e. better than Russell, Davis, Mendenhall and Moore, then he’s a financial liability. Not a talent issue, a business decision.

Can’t resist a comment on the Clark issue. Clark and Randle El essentially switched teams. Clark is missed terribly in Skins country, and they believe we got the better part of the deal.

Agree with the under the radar comments. In particular, they keep forgetting that this is no longer Bill Cowher’s team. They think Tomlin is some sort of caretaker. With the health and depth of the D-line being the biggest, perhaps only, question mark, this team will likely be much better on all three sides of the ball this year, strength of schedule be damned. I think many in SN will be surprised at what comes out of the gates this year.

by RickVa on May 23, 2008 3:38 PM EDT to parent up   0 recs

Does anyone know exactly how the roster works?

I understand you can dress 45 and have 53 on the roster (those eight I assume are the practice squad?). What other lists are there? Do you have extra spots for PUP? Do you have a finite number of IR spots? Thanks.

by maryrose on May 23, 2008 2:14 PM EDT   0 recs

Roster

I’ll add a little bit here but I’m certainly no roster expert, hopefully Truth will stick around long enough to clear this up b/c he’s much closer to a roster expert:

53 on the roster - 45 on the active roster - those 8 guys have the easiest job in sports b/c they’re paid as NFL players but don’t dress on Sundays (think Gary Russell and Willie Reid in 2007). This can obviously change week to week. If I remember correctly though a 3rd QB (emergency QB) doesn’t count against the 45 (I’m fairly certain that’s accurate).

The practice squad consists of 8 players who are paid considerably less than a NFL player (minimum for practice squad players is 88K but a NFL player minimum is 285K).

PUP—I’m not sure how many spots but here’s the rules on PUP list thanks to Wikipedia (A player who begins the season on the PUP list must sit out his team’s first six games. After that point, the player is allowed to practice with the team through Week 10 of the NFL season, and can be activated any time within that window. If the player is not activated by Week 10, he must stop practicing and is unavailable to be moved to the active roster for the remainder of the season.) There’s also a rule that once a player steps on the practice field for the training camp he can’t be put on the PUP list.

IR—there isn’t a finite number as far as I know b/c there isn’t any benefit for putting a player on there. A player is done for season so he can’t play for rest of the season.

by cgolden on May 23, 2008 2:36 PM EDT to parent up   0 recs

Thanks Golden

That answers why an IR player isn’t allowed to practice (someone should tell the Patriots – oh yeah, they misinterpreted that rule); because the PUP list is for that.

So my remaining questions: Is the eight-player practice squad different from the eight guys who don’t dress (53-45)? Can practice squad players get signed by other teams? Can you put anyone you want on the practice squad?

Thanks again

by maryrose on May 23, 2008 2:50 PM EDT to parent up   0 recs

Is the eight-player practice squad different from the eight guys who don’t dress (53-45)?

Yes these are completely different people. Dallas Baker was on the practice squad but not on the the 53 man roster. Gary Russell & Willie Reid were on the 53 man roster but not on the active 45 for most of the season. The ‘active 45’ has to be set a certain amount of time before game time.
Can practice squad players get signed by other teams?

Practice squad guys can be signed by other teams but in order to do that they have to be added to the 53. Think Jason Capizzi.
Can you put anyone you want on the practice squad?

A player can only be on the practice squad for 3 seasons. There are some loopholes to this but I don’t know what they are. I remember last year during camp there was some loophole that would allow St Pierre to go to the practice squad. We talked about it on Curtain so maybe someone can search and find it.

by cgolden on May 23, 2008 3:31 PM EDT to parent up   0 recs

Thanks much

That’s good because we’re deep this year. That means guys like Rucker, Trannon, Baker, Bloom, Gerran Walker, Travis Williams, Lorello are all practice squad possibilities in addition to the drafted guys.

by maryrose on May 23, 2008 3:48 PM EDT to parent up   0 recs

Everyone likes Micah Rucker, but...

...the UDFA I think have the best chance to stick are Doug Legursky and Kyle Clement. Rucker has a tall order (no pun intended) to stick as one of the top 5 WR, with Ward, Holmes, and Washington as incumbents, and Limas Sweed guaranteed the fourth spot. He has to beat out Willie Reid and Dallas Baker (who know the system), along with Matt Trannon, Jeremy Bloom, and Gerran Walker who have all been through other NFL camps before.

I think that the pro day workout numbers posted by Legursky (at 6-2, 325) and Clement (at 6-4, 317), are every bit as impressive in relation to their size and position as Rucker’s(at 6-6, 220). Legursky benched 38 times and ran a 5.02 40. Clement benched 37 times and ran a 5.20 40. Kyle’s numbers, across the board, were better than top DT Sedrick Ellis (6-1, 307) managed at the combine.

There is a lot more room to find a spot with the Steelers as an interior offensive or defensive lineman than as a wide reciever, I think.

by robert ethan on May 24, 2008 10:45 PM EDT   0 recs

For once, I agree with you. Rucker has a much harder path to the roster and Clement. I imagine that they are all likely to end up on the PS. Although if Mahan is shown the door, Legursky is probably in.

by Cols714 on May 25, 2008 1:19 PM EDT   0 recs

Why not all 3?

Guys, one thing you have to remember about the WR’s is that the Steelers kept 5 WRs AND a return specialist. So, you can insert the best returner (Bloom, Reid, Walker?) and let them have Rossum’s spot. That still leaves 5 WR spots. I don’t think Micah Rucker beating out the WRs mentioned above is such a tall order because none of them have made an active roster in the NFL.

It’s not like he has to beat out someone who is established. Plus, as a rookie free agent, he is cheaper than any of the above mentioned. Also, I don’t think Rucker has anything to do with Legursky and Clement making the team. And also, why not keep all three?

This team can have a roster with 10 rookies. Clement can clearly grab that last DL spot. Legursky might have to beat out both Mahan and the rookie center from Rutgers that made the team last year. He probably has the toughest way to go. But then again, why not keep all 3? I think it is about time that Tomlin begins turning over this roster before it gets too old. Should be some interesting story lines come training camp.

Your thoughts?

by datruth4life on May 25, 2008 1:39 PM EDT   0 recs

For sure the situations of the 3 players aren't directly connected...

..it was just that I’ve been hearing a lot of hype about Rucker, and a lot of fans have him making the team. Going into the draft it seemed that the priorities were an offensive and/or defensive interior linemen. The only lineman they drafted was Tony Hills in the fourth round, and he is still recuperating from a broken leg. Rucker was a small school star who posted strong pro day numbers, and the same holds true for Legursky and Clement.

Legursky was fairly highly rated, but centers aren’t a hot commodity on draft day. I like his chances because he has the size and strength at the position that Tomlin said he was looking for. He outweighs Darnell Stapleton by 40 pounds, and is considerably stronger in the weight room. Clement comes in at a postion where the vets are either aging or injured. He wasn’t highly rated, but was listed as low as 266 pounds prior to the draft. I think a lot of the scouts missed the fact that he had bulked up considerably at Northwood. He put up impressive stats there and worked out surprisingly well for a guy who is 6-4 and close to 320 pounds. As for Rucker, he has the height they were looking for, but I don’t know that he is all that fast on the field, and he is up against several other tall, young, talented, receivers in order to win a spot.

by robert ethan on May 26, 2008 12:38 AM EDT to parent up   0 recs

Sure, they can keep all three, but it’s not likely. How often does a team have 3 UDFAs make its final roster? Legursky probably only stays if Mahan is cut or he beats out Stapleton. Clement really just has to beat out Eason.

by Cols714 on May 25, 2008 8:23 PM EDT   0 recs

Rucker comments

I think we still need to see all of these players on the field. I know a WR with Rucker’s size, 6’6, 220 lbs, speed at 4.47 and strength at 20 bench presses doesn’t come along every year. I don’t know anything about Trannon and I don’t think Baker is fast enough. Their play will sort things out.

And by the way, don’t go by the Steelers website as far as Stapleton’s size. He is up to 315 lbs and has said he wants to be at 310 lbs. for the season. In looking at several games from this past year, most of the offensive line breakdowns came because Mahan struggled and K. Simmons didn’t have a good year.

It just makes what Ben did last year that much more amazing. I don’t see how this line can be worse than it was this past year, especially with a legitimate starting NFL center in Hartwig, a healthy M. Smith and Starks and Colon competing for right tackle.

The actual pro day numbers for Kyle Clement are 6’ 4’’, 316 lbs, 37 bench presses at 225 lbs., 5.21 in the 40 yard dash, 32.2 inches arm length, 10 inch hand size, 4.54 short shuttle, 4.54 cone, 7.54 broad jump and 8’11 inch broad jump. In other words, the dude is a load but still has pretty good athleticism.

However, I think Rucker’s numbers are even more impressive. A guy that is 6’6’’, 221-pounds, can run a 4.47 40 yard dash with a 40 inch vertical and 20 bench presses. That bench press number is the second highest number for WRs in this draft class. Imagine what he will do once he becomes a part of an NFL offseason conditioning program.

The 5th WR on this team won’t play on Sundays unless someone gets hurt (ala Reid this past year). It’ll likely be the top 4 (Holmes, Ward, Washington, Sweed) and the return specialist (Bloom, Walker, Reid) whom are active on game days. Rucker sounds like a diamond in the rough to me worth keeping around for a redshirt year.

Thoughts?

by datruth4life on May 26, 2008 1:39 AM EDT   0 recs

Pro day numbers have to be taken with a grain of salt..

Bench presses are straightforward, but some of the other tests can be fudged to favor the athlete, and generally are. Rucker was lighter than his listed weight when he ran on his pro day, and he was timed at 4.47 and 4.57. A lot of the workouts, especially the smaller schools, have only the odd scout in attendance, so it is hard to get a consensus on times. If there are several different times, the one that gets printed is always the lowest, even though that may be an aberration. The standards are much more rigorous at the combine. Since you’re dealing with fractions of seconds in trying to seperate the athletes, the pro day timing numbers are pretty much worthless. My feeling is that Rucker is no faster than Dallas Baker, and not nearly as polished a receiver, though he is a bit bigger. Overall, Rucker seems similar to Matt Trannon, but Trannon was productive at a higher level.

I think the situation with the O line is much more complex than the talents of a couple individuals. It depends more on cohesion, stability, and depth. There is virtually no chance that the same five players will start all season, and a decent chance that one or more will miss extended time. So you have to look at about 8 players manning 5 positions, and how quickly a replacement can fit in when called upon. Beyond that, you also have to consider the blocking skills of the fullback and tight ends. When discussing the quality of the line play many seem to overlook the fact that two long time staples of the offense, Dan Kreider and Jerame Tuman were not around any longer. Neither got a lot of attention because they didn’t touch the ball very often, but they weren’t just standing around on every play.

by robert ethan on May 26, 2008 3:01 PM EDT to parent up   0 recs

forget about 40 times, etc.

this only really matters as a confirmation of what scouts see on the college football field. Once in camp for the team, it is much more important how they play in practice. I can see why you are using these measurables to compare players, but at this point we can judge from mini/training camp, preseason, etc. which players are standing out. BTW, pro days are not worthless, 40 times can and are adjusted for track speed. Also, bench presses are also subject to slightly different standards at pro days, like how far extended your arms need to be for a rep to count.
That said, I, like many others am most worried about D-line. While not quite as important for us as other teams, we still need at least one backup at DE who would not kill our run d if he starts. I believe Hoke did a credible job when Hampton went injured a year or two ago.
I would agree about cohesion on o-line. With exceptions, like Mahan getting manhandled at the point of attack, line problems can be overcome by players knowing their assignments, talking and covering for one another. This year and next will show us more about our o-line coach than our players, imho. I like the starting five in Truth’s post, and am high on Stapleton as backup C. So, to me, Legursky would have to impress at G to make the roster, but seems like PS material to me, unless the team is afraid of another team picking him up, and put him on the roster like Darnell last year.
We’ll see whether or not A. Smith learns about angles and plays generally smarter this year, since we need a “Safe” safety to pair with wild-man Polamalu, as mentioned by several above. This means Clark for now, until he breaks down, or Smith shows better awareness, which could well happen this year. Mundy is supposedly a cerebral player like Clark, so could push for backup FS, with Smith relegated to carryin Troy’s jock and hair brush, although probably not this year.
Also, I like Humpal to be a solid backup ILB and have the inside track to Farrior’s job down the line.

by tkired on May 27, 2008 7:50 AM EDT to parent up   0 recs

good point Truth

The 5th WR spot will most likely be a practice squad player for 15 of the 16 games. He’ll be inactive nearly every single game and even in games that he dresses he’ll have very limited snaps. The only difference between the 5th WR spot and the practice squad will be the amount of pay.

by cgolden on May 27, 2008 11:01 AM EDT to parent up   0 recs

Steelers Usually Hit on rookie free agents

Guys, great discussion on a lot of topics. I think this rookie class will go down as one of K. Colbert’s better drafts. I also look for 2 to 3 rookie free agents to make this final team and about 10 rookies overall. The past few years, about 2 rookie free agents have made this squad each year.

I think Rucker and one of the DL could be those that do this year or maybe even the center/guard from Marshall. I also think one of the secondary spots can be grabbed by a special teamer that can also play a position well enough not to hurt the team if they had to fill in (either one of the two rookie corners or a backup safety).

I believe this team will keep 5 corners, 4 safeties and 1 spot for a return specialist. Usually, most NFL teams keep 10 players for the secondary. I think A. Smith will be the first safety off the bench for this team if either Polamula or Ryan Clark can’t go, but I don’t think Smith is the type of free safety that this team needs or wants for its defense.

In LeBeau’s 3-deep system, the primary job of the free safety is to play thirds of the field and, at all cost, keep the ball in front of him. I just think Smith’s primary instincts are to attack the line of scrimmage and go get the ball. That is fine as a strong safety but not so good when you are the last line of defense.

Maybe he puts it all together this year and learns from his mistakes this past year. However, I do believe that Mundy will be groomed to take over Clark’s spot. And when was the last time the Steelers had a free safety with the size of Mundy, 6’ 1’’, 215 lbs ? Let’s just hope he can play.

I read a recent post where Dale Lolley said he expects with Najeh to be with the team until the final cuts and could win a roster spot if there are injuries. I can see that happening as well. I do think Gary Russell will show that he can play and be a keeper. I still have hopes for J. Capizzi, though he’ll have to have a lights out camp to make this team. He could be that swing tackle that every team is looking for. Capizzi has great feet for a person with that type of size.

Now how many months to the season starts? Be blessed all.

by datruth4life on May 27, 2008 8:35 AM EDT   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to BTSC, a blog dedicated to the five-time world champion Steelers. "Level-headed thinking." Pittsburgh Post-Gazette

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Small
Steeler's biggest challenger in AFC North