Behind the Steel Curtain: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:





Steelers Draft in Review: Final Thoughts

Rather than drawing this out any more than I have to, I'll be brief with the last two picks and give a few final thoughts on the draft. 

Mike Humpal, ILB, 6'3 244

Strengths/Weaknesses: Humpal seems to be a strong run stuffing type of LB with limited speed. He knows how to plug rushing lanes, take on blocks, and make tackles. He may struggle in man-to-man coverage, but he isn't a huge liability in short zone coverage. He seems to be a tough, smart, hard working guy who is willing to play special teams.

Analysis: I was hoping the Steelers would make a pick like this. Timmons and Foote may be undersized for the SILB position, but Humpal could give us a solid run stuffer if Farrior leaves or gets injured. We don't have any other players in this mold right now, so he has a good chance of making the team as a backup and special teams guy. As a bonus, his name gives us a chance to come up with some creative expressions (e.g. "Joshua Cribbs, you've just been Hump'd!!").

Ryan Mundy, S, 6'1 215

Strengths/Weaknesses: Mundy is a big, strong safety with good hands and ball skills. He is a good run defender and tackler, but he doesn't have great range or speed. He is a hard worker, but according to NFL's draft site, he doesn't get excited about special teams, which is a concern. He transferred to WVU after being at UM for 4 years, and while there doesn't seem to be anything wrong it, it does seem a bit strange.

Analysis: Ryan Clark seems to be fine, but having an extra safety can't hurt since our two starters have some issues with injuries. While Mundy may get cut if he doesn't do well on special teams, he looks like a solid backup at SS with enough upside to grow into a possible starter. If he shows potential, he could push Carter for a roster spot.

Summary and Final Thoughts:

The biggest thing I noticed as I was looking at scouting reports of the Steelers draftees was that in almost every case, the players we drafted are hard workers with a good attitude and were productive in college. If we look at a lot of the players we passed on (Balmer, Avril, and Moore come to mind), we see great athletes who either don't seem committed to hard work or don't translate into productive football players.  Time will tell, but I think this draft was outstanding both in the value we got and in the type of players we drafted. We didn't fill every need, but we did fix serious depth issues at SILB, OLB, and RB. In a year or two, the skill players in this offense could be as good as anyone in the league, and if the OL (and Arians) can even be average, it's reasonable to think that we could have one of the best offenses in the league while maintaining a very good defense.

My only concern with how this draft worked out is that next year, we may be in a position of even greater need on OL and DL and even more pressured to pick for need over value. If that is the case, we may see a couple of trades or reaches that at some level are the result of this draft. If that's the only thing we're compaining about though, it's hard not to call this a highly successful draft.

0 recs | Comment 5 comments | Add your comment

Read Related

Story-email Email | Print |

Comments

Display:

smarts

A major strength of Mundy that you didn’t mention – this is one bright kid. He transferred from Michigan and then, in his first season at WVU, learned the system so well he was lining people up on defense.

He seems to me to be a ryan clark type. Not the physical player that Anthony Smith is, but smart and tough and disciplined. I love both these picks.

by syrsteelerfan on May 5, 2008 4:06 PM EDT reply reply   0 recs

Mundy

Yeah, I didn’t think think of that. I’m hoping Mundy can turn out like Clark, but we’ll see. He’s not the fastest guy (4.55 at his pro day), but he seems fairly savvy and he plays the ball well, which can go a long way. If he doesn’t stick on ST’s, though, he’ll be lucky to make the practice squad.

by BadMaafala on May 5, 2008 5:05 PM EDT to parent up reply reply   0 recs

Right on Bad

My initial concern with this Draft is that we did not address the defensive line, and I thought the last three guys we did draft were expendable in comparison to trading all three picks and moving up to get an impact D-Lineman.

But that is a shallow view from a structural standpoint. What if the D-Linemen just weren’t good enough? Should the FO have forced them anyhow. The answer is no. Upon further review, I noticed two things.

First, other than Chris Long and Dorsey, it seemed like all the other D-Linemen dropped lower than their expected draft position. Obviously all the other front offices were not sold on D-Linemen either. No one was drooling to get any of those Dre Moore, Avril, Red Bryant guys. Even Merling and Calais Campbell fell. Hell, they all fell.

Second, notice how Phil Savage played this year’s Draft. He needed D-Linemen worse than us and worse than anyone; yet, he chose not to even get involved in this year’s Draft. He chose to trade his picks for existing veterans at that position. True, Corey Williams and Shaun Rogers are 29 and 28 years old, so I am not necessarily commending the Browns for trading Draft picks for guys that age, but my point is, Savage went to that extreme to get linemen for a reason – maybe the Draft didn’t produce any good ones? Maybe Savage saw that ahead of time?

My bottom line is that our FO knows a helluva lot more than I do, and they also know that D-Linemen were more important to us than a backup quarterback or backup safety or even the two linebackers we got. But, if they determined that those linemen weren’t projected to pan, then why force need that will result in a zero balance.

That said, however, MaaFala is dead on. Our problem didn’t go away. It just one year older. Next offseason and next draft we will not have the luxury of avoiding the issue again. we must grab a free agent, perhaps pull a Savage or perhaps reach in the Draft. Sooner or later, and now sooner, we must prepare for aging and injuries on the D-Line because the backups and young people we have will probably not be the answer.

by maryrose on May 5, 2008 4:16 PM EDT reply reply   0 recs

"Team needs"

I think it is very presumptuous to start indentifying “team needs”. As I recall, a couple of years back the crying “team need” was for a big RB to complement Willie Parker. The fans wanted a Lendale White or Michael Bush in the early rounds. About the only player the team drafted who fit that bill was Cedric Humes in the seventh round, and he is long gone. Now the pick of Mendenhall is regarded as a “luxury” pick, and a lot of fans are complaining that the team did not draft a lineman. Did the “need” from a couple years back go away, or is it more acute now that Parker is a couple of years older and has suffered his first serious injury?

Same, same at WR, where the fans have identified a tall red zone type receiver as a “team need” since Plax left town three seasons back. Fred Gibson wasn’t the answer, and Dallas Baker has done nothing to ease the concern. So, that “need” still exists and using a second round pick on Limas Sweed goes a long way to addressing it.

The team has been preparing for the loss of Jeff Hartings and Alan Faneca for a few years now, I think. Max Starks, Trai Essex, Chris Komeatu, Willie Colon, were all drafted in the mid round range, and Tony Hills was added this year. Sean Mahan and Justin Hartwig were brought in as band aid replacements on the assumption that at least two or three of the youngsters will prove to be legitimate NFLers. As it sits, the team has 3 of 5 Super Bowl starters returning on the line, complemented by a couple of experienced
NFL starters just reaching their prime in Mahan and Hartwig.

As far as the D line is concerned, it is at least as solid as it was at the SB, with Brett Keisel replacing Kimo Von Oelhoffen alongside Aaron Smith and Casey Hampton. Nick Eason is a decent backup, and Chris Hoke is a proven sub with very little mileage despite his age. The Steeler defensive system does not require the front three to be playmakers, only to handle the traffic to free up the blitzing linebackers and/or safeties. It makes little sense to expend a premium pick on a position where the player’s athletic ability will be stifled in any case.

by robert ethan on May 8, 2008 6:36 PM EDT reply reply   0 recs

Mike Humpal

Funny thing about Humpal is that his Combine and Pro Day workout numbers were probably the most impressive (given his position and size) of any of this year’s Steeler draft picks. Mike finished among the top 10 linebackers in half a dozen different categories at the Combine, then added a 38” vertical and 10’ + long jump on his pro day. Considering that he was one of the bigger linebackers available in the draft at 6-3, 245 pounds, his numbers were top notch. Still he gets cliched into the stiff white guy special teams fodder category by most observers. He will open some eyes in camp, I think.

by robert ethan on May 8, 2008 6:45 PM EDT reply reply   0 recs


User Tools

Welcome to BTSC, a blog dedicated to the five-time world champion Steelers. "Level-headed thinking." Pittsburgh Post-Gazette
Ad-medium-smq

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Oreg_4938_1__small
CONGRATS ON DIXON!
Small
Spygate
Small
Math Gurus Interested In Hypocycloids, You're Not Alone
Small
TheMostViolentTeam Set to Kick Butt, Take Names
The_prestige_poster_small
Who'd We Anger In The League Office?
Small
New Search Functions Up and Running - Check Em Out
Small
Steelers Vs Penguins ?
Small
Question of Logic
Small
What is an NFL Draft bust?
Capt
super bowl champions??

Post New FanPost All FanPosts Carrot-mini


Ad-banner-faketeams

Site Editors

Small Blitzburgh

Contributing Writers

Dockett_small cgolden

ad

Site Meter