Together We All Eat
Now that the dust has settled a bit from the draft, I'd like to summarize three things that should be on the Steelers agenda as we move toward the new season.
The Steelers picked up Mewelde Moore because they did not think a guy like Mendenhall would fall to #23. Perhaps they would have still wanted Moore, though I doubt it, but that argument at this point is moot. My guess is that they guessed one of the tackles would fall to them at 23, but with the massive fire sale of that commodity in the first round, they decided to let the draft come to them rather than they reaching for it.
Along those same lines, they also drafted Limas Sweed not figuring he would fall to pick #55. The rest of the draft also followed the BPA path to the tune of two linebackers, an offensive tackle and even a quarterback.
So we added four offensive weapons to the fold, including Moore and Dennis Dixon. Interestingly, while we may not have had depth at skill position, we already had a very solid starrting unit. Now we have depth out the wazoo, including the drafting of Matt Spaeth a year ago.
The first thing Mike Tomlin needs to do is establish a mindset using his phrase that "together we all eat." Steelers offensive players need to forego individual statistics and completely buy into the team concept. We can't have any of that Cedric Wilson mentality to "get me the ball." Mendenhall and Sweed need to be patient and take the opportunities given to him and make the most of them. Conversely, Willie and Hines and Tone need to welcome these guys and understand that the sweetness of team success far exceeds the hollow feeling of piling up numbers for a team who falls short.
This is easily said and harder done. You can say all the right things and show the media that you are helping the youngsters, but if you really feel it deep inside, there will be nothing this team cannot accomplish. Tomlin has to pound this truism far beyond words. Together we can all feast.
Secondly, the Steelers need to use their full weaponry to improve the individual parts. In the NFL, you never stay the same. You are either getting better or getting worse. The San Antonio Spurs and Boston Red Sox might have the luxury of mailing it in each year. The Yankees and Red Wings might have a bye into the playoffs every year, but in the NFL you are either rising or falling.
Yes, they are all professionals, but they were human beings before they were pros. Knowing that your position is secure, except for the quarterback spot, can lead to complacency to at least some degree. Mendenhall needs to push Willie, Moore needs push Mendenhall, Gary Russell needs to push all of them. Trannon and Baker need to push Sweed and Sweed needs to push Hines and Tone. Bruce Davis and Mike Humpal need to push the linebackers. All this pushing is a good thing. Everyone can make everyone else get better.
Third, we need to get complicated in an uncomplicated way. We need to get opposing defenses thinking about both Mendenhall and Willie in the same backfield. They need to plan against a four wide-receiver set and a double tight-end package and every possible permutation thereof. The more confused our opponents are they better chances we have. In other words, we have all these weapons, now let's use the breadth of our arsenal to our advantage. Skill position rookies don't require a two-year apprenticeship anymore. While maybe not full-bore, first-year players like Heath, Tone, Spaeth and even Ben were able to contribute to some degree in their first seasons.
That said, I don't want to get so cute that we out-think ourselves. Football is still a basic game and we need to keep our focus on doing the basics that we are capable of. At the risk of talking out of both sides of my mouth, if you'll pardon the oxymoron, we need to get more complicated without getting too complicated. We need to find that fine line.
If we really hone in on those three agenda items, in addition to finding that new chemistry on the offensive line, we can be in for alot of fun this year.
0 recs |
20
comments
| Add your comment
Comments
Moore
like blitzburgh, I was really excited about signing Moore. I may be making too much of the tomlin connection, but I think he’s going to get some touches and do some good things this season. Not that I have any scientific basis for that statement. :-D
by acrollet on
May 10, 2008 1:12 AM EDT
reply
0 recs
Don't stop now....
I’m sure there must be another time worn cliche or two out there you can add to the soup.
What was the point of this indulgence? Are you waiting for someone to come along and say that what the team needs is more prima donnas who are only concerned about themselves? That if you spell it a certain way there is an “I” in TEIM!
by robert ethan on
May 10, 2008 1:19 AM EDT
reply
0 recs
you missed the point of his post
It’s actually a very good point: when you have this many offensive weapons, there’s only so many opportunities for players to ‘get theirs’. Guys like Hines Ward and FWP, who have had tons of personal success, are going to have to bite their lip and accept slightly different roles. Guys like Santonio Holmes and Heath Miller, who are REALLY close to having breakout years and becoming all pros who get paid handsomely, are going to have to forego some opportunities to inflate their personal numbers so that we can work in Limas, Mewelde, Rashard, Spaeth, etc.
Having all these options only works if we figure out a way to keep everyone happy and playing hard.
I enjoyed this post.
by Blitzburgh on
May 10, 2008 1:20 PM EDT
up
reply
0 recs
You shouldn't stop either...
I’m sure you could have fit in a few more sarcastic, self-important questions.
What was the point of this comment? Are you waiting for someone to say, “Boy, that Ethan sure knows how to burn a guy”? If you don’t like a story, disagree with it, don’t make fun of it without saying what you disagree with. Just cause we’re on the internet doesn’t mean we have to act like it.
by BadMaafala on
May 11, 2008 10:05 AM EDT
up
reply
0 recs
Moore
With or without Mendenhall the Steelers sorely needed a KR. Moore fills that bill. He will also provide a valuable back up in case of injury or fatigue to FWP. Mendenhall will not have the pressure of stepping into the #1 role so soon.
In the end defense wins championships. If the Steelers can get better ST play giving the opposition worse field position and Woodley and Timmons invigorate the pass rush the Steelers will be playing into January.
Hey Robert, to quote Michael Jordan “there is no I in team but there is an I in win.”
When You Run The Ball Good Things Happen
by 5020 on
May 10, 2008 10:19 AM EDT
reply
0 recs
teamwork
May sound like a cliche, but only gets mentioned a lot because it is true. Football in particular depends on the team working as a whole. On offense, players worried about their own stats inevitably are a detriment to the team. Likewise, on D, if a player is constantly trying to get individual stats, like sacks, while neglecting their responsibility to stuff a running lane, leads to a bad defense. So, here’s to hoping the Steelers individuals coalesce into a TEAM all working together. and then eating together, as it were.
by tkired on
May 10, 2008 12:27 PM EDT
reply
0 recs
I'm with you Maryrose
Agree with the premise behind all your points, but I don’t think there is a lot of cause for concern.
If you’re in it for the personal glory and that comes from individual achievement, then yes, this is a potential problem. But Pittsburgh’s team culture, both before and during the Tomlin era is not, and has never been about that. Players that need that (think Plaxico Burress) eventually leave. (But I bet after a few years in the wilderness, and after experiencing a championship, he would fit in better now than he did then). Willie gets it. He knows that Bettis didn’t have to do a damn thing to help him. But without both of them a world championship probably wasn’t possible. Hines, in spite of his alleged problems with Ben wanting a big receiver, gets it. His helping out Sweed was not just PR. I watched him do the same at St Vincent with Santonio when Tone was a rookie; staying after practice so that Tone got extra work. Besides, Hines place in history is assured. With all the team records and a SB MVP this guy is almost assured a place in Canton. But Hines is a lot like Michael Jordan, he needs perceived slights to motivate him. Another guy I saw putting extra time helping others at St Vincent was Troy. When your stars set the tone like that, who has the nerve, veteran or rookie to behave otherwise. That is why it’ll be a cold day in Hell when you see narcissists like Chad Johnson and TO in the Black and Gold. The culture here simply won’t tolerate their bullsh*t. Even if it is in ‘fun’. And at this rate neither one will make Canton, even with their gaudy stats. I don’t think that Mendenhall and Sweed were blowing smoke to the media when they mentioned the level of help and cooperation they experienced from the veteran players. Nor do I think it was because of their draft status that they were treated this way. This is an organization that is in pursuit of championships. They have some proven formulas as to how to get that done and they have no intention of deviating.
I also agree that we need to use every single weapon, fire every single bullet that we’ve got in order to be successful. I have been reading with interest the developing notion that we’ve gone from being rather dangerously thin at running back to being top heavy at that position. A question for our experts; when was the last time that all of our running backs were healthy for the entire season? I don’t have the answer, but I do know you that it hasn’t been true for at least the last five years. And while it is undoubtedly true that we wouldn’t have taken Moore, and perhaps he would not have wanted to come if it was known that Mendenhall would fall in our laps, I don’ t think the situation for Moore is identical to that which he left in Minnesota. If Arians does successfully install a two back system then Moore will probably get as much playing time as he would if the number two guy were Davenport or Russell.
The more important question it seems to me is not if the individual players get the idea of together we all eat, but if the offensive leadership, specifically, Arians and Ben understand that as well. When Kordell Stewart was functioning as Slash, one of the most important contributions he made to the team is that opponents were forced to spend extra time preparing for how to offset him. That’s what we want to accomplish this year and beyond. Make them have to worry about FWP AND Mendenhall AND Moore AND Russell. Focus on shutting down Hines? Fine let Tone kill you. Stop Tone? Then what are you gonna do about Sweed? Shut down those three? Have Nate cut their throats. Stop Miller? Damn, forgot about Spaeth. However, (and this is a big however) the offensive coordinator has to be creative enough both in his individual play calling, and how he sets up the defense to make this work. He has to think like a boxer; when to jab, when to throw combinations, when to go to the body, when to go to the head. You also need Ben to understand that he may have history with Hines and Miller is his roommate, but if he spreads the wealth around everyone benefits in the long haul.
If they figure out how to do that, then we could have an extraordinarily successful season with different heroes on a weekly basis. Might mean fewer people going to the Pro Bowl, but if you win a ring, who cares? The only thing I’m concerned about is that there aren’t enough roster spots. We’re going to have to give up some talent we ordinarily might not want to part with. Nice problem though.
by RickVa on
May 10, 2008 1:34 PM EDT
reply
0 recs
Roster Spots
This might be an even bigger problem this year, as they cut 6 spots from everyone’s roster (80 from 86) for the preseason. I read somewhere this will affect new coaches the most, as they may not plan ahead for limited injury replacements and run veterans too hard in preseason. As this was an issue already brought up here about Tomlin’s training camp last season, lets hope it doesnt actually get worse this year.
by tkired on
May 10, 2008 1:47 PM EDT
up
reply
0 recs
It isn't the players we have to worry about, it's the coaches
This draft in particular, Kevin Colbert has focussed on drafting players without character concerns. Mendenhall seems remarkably level headed for a 20 year old college football star. Sweed looks like a solid citizen as well, particularly as far as WR are concerned. Bruce Davis brings some charisma and swagger, but doesn’t seem like a risk to go outside the law as Joey Porter was. Tony Hills was a team captain at Texas. Dennis Dixon is working on an advanced degree in addition to his football accomplishments. Same for Mike Humpal, a perennial All Academic selection at Iowa, and Ryan Mundy, who finished his degree at Michigan before transferring and taking post grad courses. Most of the free agents they brought in are off the charts as student athletes.
But Tomlin is no Mensa candidate. His aphorisms are painfully simplistic. I imagine there is a lot of eye rolling in the room when he starts to pontificate. The coaches he hired are not much better, aside from Ken Anderson. Larry Zierlien is the old school porn hound, and Bruce Ariens is emminently unlikable, in my books. I blame it on the Rooneys, particularly old Art, who has grasped onto misguided political correctness in his muddled old age. He seems to be reaching for bland, insipid, shallow “redemption” as personified by his selection of Tomlin and his support of Barack Obama politically.
by robert ethan on
May 10, 2008 3:20 PM EDT
reply
0 recs
So you don't like the fact
that Rooney hired a black man and supports a black man.
Quick word: This sort of agenda isn’t going to endear you to many here. Keep your politics to yourself, or don’t come back. .
by Desroko on
May 10, 2008 7:42 PM EDT
up
reply
1 recs
what's wrong with
Tomlin simplifying. football is a game that is way overthought, especially with the abundance of media and “expert” analysts these days. what about Arians is “unlikable”, do you know him personally, or at all? you made a blanket generalization with nothing at all to back it, thats the problem I have with your post.
by TheMostViolentTeam on
May 11, 2008 12:17 AM EDT
up
reply
0 recs
Who has an agenda?
You are the one who has smeared the blog with race comments. I don’t regard Obama as being a “black man”, particularly. As far as I know he was born half black, half white, and raised by the white side of his family. As for Tomlin, I don’t know his biological background, nor do I particularly care about it. I just hate the bland, nonsensical, smarm that comes out of the mouths of both of them.
Though not as much as I hate the jackass computer tough guy innuendo and threats that come out of yours. No attempts will be made to “endear” myself to the resident racist “sheriff” of this blog, you can count on that. Hopefully you’re not representative of the general population here.
by robert ethan on
May 10, 2008 11:50 PM EDT
reply
0 recs
Shoulder your sidearm, Deputy
Let’s set aside the race stuff and assume you intended nothing disparaging by your comment.
The comment still reeks of the kind of unsophisticated arrogance best left for the yammering screamaholics of sports radio and the like. And just like the community here works to ensure the environment remains free from the poisons of racism, so too do we call bullshit when someone unjustifiably blows their gasket.
What’s ironic to me is the particular ammo you used to fuel your critique of Tomlin—essentially condemning him for being a simpleton who must bore and deflate those he’s been charged to lead.
I don’t know about everyone else, but the first thought that popped in my head after reading that was, “What special kind of simpleton basis his critique on a coach’s press clips?”
The subsequent questions that popped in my head weren’t much more charitable than the first, I’m afraid:
“How arrogant do you have to be to bury a coach with so little data other than what you’ve observed in his media relations?”
“If you’re going to criticize a coach’s worth based on his intelligence and sophistication, shouldn’t you have an intelligent and sophisticated case to make in support of your point?”
I could go on, but I think the point is clear. Though you’re completely free to view Mike Tomlin, Barack Obama, or anyone else with whatever skepticism you like, this community is full of “sheriffs” who will take premature, B-level opinion mongering and expose it as being no less bland and nonsensical than the coach speak upon which you’ve based your critique of Mike Tomlin.
Get back to me when we’ve got a real set of performance data by which we can judge this coach. Or if you must speak sooner, don’t be mad if I tune out the smarm.
--PB--
by PB @ BON on
May 12, 2008 1:50 AM EDT
up
reply
0 recs
Good call
I agree that I didn’t see any overtly racist comments in your original post but also agree that it’s silly to judge a coach based on his handling of the press. Bill Belichick* (for all that I hate him) usually says the most bland indescript things of any coach ever, and yet most would argue that he’s one of the best coaches in the league right now.
I think part of what rubbed folks here the wrong way was the fact that for as much as I can tell your very first post ever was just slamming one of our best and most thoughtful regulars post. One of the great things about this blog as opposed to most is the consideration we give each other. If you think a post is silly, just ignore it and move on. We’re not here to show each other how witty or sarcastic we can be. We’re here to talk Steelers football.
by Chicago Steeler on
May 12, 2008 8:15 AM EDT
up
reply
0 recs
Too Simple?
“But Tomlin is no Mensa candidate. His aphorisms are painfully simplistic. I imagine there is a lot of eye rolling in the room when he starts to pontificate.”
The same could be said for Tomlin’s predecessor,one William Laird Cowher;and he didn’t have a bad career.
by steelerambassador on
May 11, 2008 12:37 PM EDT
reply
0 recs
"no Mensa candidate"?
All coaches speak in simplistic aphorisms. Tomlin’s use of them doesn’t mean he isn’t a very smart guy. Look at the fact that he graduated from William & Mary, which is consistently ranked as one of the top 30 or so colleges in the country. Read what other coaches he’s worked with and players he’s coached have to say about him—here are the words used to describe him: intelligent, bright, confidence, character, integrity.
I for one am quite happy that Mike Tomlin is the coach of the Pittsburgh Steelers, and I look forward to the day when he proves all the doubters and haters wrong by bringing another Lombardi trophy home.
by nycsteeler on
May 11, 2008 2:41 PM EDT
reply
0 recs
Tomlin
Hey Robert Ethan, Tomlin has been highly regarded by the some of the coaching greats, like Tony Dungy. Also the whole “Mensa thing”-Let’s be honest, not many football playerd are Einsteins, I mean some of them are smart but there are a lot of others who need someone else to tie their shoelaces for them( Chad Johnson for instance). I’m not saying that there’s guys like this on the Steelers, but it’s better to keep things simple anyway, just in case.
HSSTEELER told you
by HighSchoolSteeler on
May 12, 2008 10:28 AM EDT
up
reply
0 recs
Great points rose
This team has the talent and explosiveness to be special, they just can’t let egos get in the way.
by cgolden on
May 12, 2008 11:08 AM EDT
reply
0 recs
Great points
maryrose, I think that you nailed it on the head. This team has a lot of talent this year, and the mental toughness and willingness to work together for the team is most important. I can think of two major examples of that off the top of my head: Bill Russell and “Mean” Joe Greene. Russell was asked by Red Auerbach to focus on defense even to the expense of his offensive number. He did, and his team won 9 (or was it 11) championships. Joe Greene made it his responsibility to always either make the play or occupy two or more opposing players. He allowed himself to be played in such a way that made it more likely that we would be double-teamed than make the play. By humbling himself and putting the team ahead of his personal glory, he won 4 SBs in 6 years.
Anyway, I think that this was a great post pointing out things that may seem obvious, but so often the “obvious” things are overlooked.
by WolfpackSteelersFan on
May 12, 2008 11:37 AM EDT
reply
0 recs









