A Closer Look at the Steelers QBs Since Terry Bradshaw (Part 2)
Onward through the fog that is the so-so QB play Pittsburgh received from their signal-callers after Terry Bradshaw hung up his cleats for the final time. Though many of the names discussed in Part 1, save Mark Malone, and many here in Part 2, were quite obscure, we're eventually making our way towards some of the more infamous and well-recognized QBs in the post-Dynasty Steelers era. Beginning with...
BUBBY BRISTER:
Can you believe that Brister was still in the league as of 2000? Kudos to him for finding a way to earn a paycheck well into his 30s in the National Football League. Anyway, Brister began his career in 1986, having been drafted in the 3rd round . He started two games in place of Malone that year in Weeks 6 and 7, losing both contests to Cincinnati and New England. Perhaps that Patriots game should have been a foretaste of the feast famine to come, as Brister completed just 33% of his passes that day, with 2 picks and 5 sacks to boot.
Brister got his first prolonged opportunity to produce when Malone left town following the 1987 season. In '88, Brister started 13 games. The team went 5-11 that year, and Brister managed to lose a staggering 8 straight starts in the middle part of the season. He managed to have solid boune-back years in '89 and '90, but nevertheless, it was clear he wasn't a viable long-term solution, and would eventually head east to Philadelphia after losing his starting job to Neil O'Donnell.
Sadly, Brister's legacy lives on on YouTube only through highlights of other teams greatest moments and in fishing videos
Career Statistics in Pittsburgh:
776 of 1477 (52.5%); 10104 yards; 51 TDs; 57 INTs; 69.8 QB Rating
Best Year in Pittsburgh (1990):
Though the Steelers would narrowly miss out on the playoffs in 1990, finishing the year 9-7 and losing their playoff berth via tiebreaker following a Week 17 defeat to the Houston Oilers, who snuck their way in in front of us by merits of that 34-14. Brister's preformance that day symbolized his tenure in Pittsburgh: decent, but not -quite- good enough for this proud franchise.
223 of 387 (57.6%); 2725 yards; 20 TDs; 14 INTs; 81.6 QB Rating
TODD BLACKLEDGE:
Better known for his work on CBS and ESPN's College Football Coverage and for his career at Penn State, Blackledge never really materialized as an NFL QB. When you consider he was taken 7th overall in the 1983 draft, a year that was not too shabby for finding QB talent, he has to be considered in any discussion surrounding the biggest busts in NFL history.

Don't be fooled by the good footwork, posture
and balance in the pocket. Blackledge struggled
as a professional QB after a brilliant collegiate
career at Penn State
Blackledge would play only two years in Pittsburgh ('88 and '89) before calling it a career. He had played the first five years of his career in Kansas City.
Career Statistics in Pittsburgh:
60 of 139 (43.2%); 776 yards; 3 TDs; 6 INTs; 50.5 QB Rating
Best year in Pittsburgh:
1988 and 1989 were equally unimpressive. No need to go there.
STEVE BONO:
Steve Bono played in Pittsburgh? Wow, I always just thought of him as Joe Montana's permanent shadow, be it in San Francisco or Kansas City. Guess not. Turns out Bono played two years in Pittsburgh ('87 and '88). He started Week 3-5 in '87, compiling a 2-1 record, and a respectable 5:2 TD/INT ratio. Again, I hope someone can fill in the gaps here, but for some reason, the coaching staff went back to Mark Malone in Week 6 (returning from injury??), and the team finished the year 5-5 en route to an 8-7 mark. Side question that I don't have time to look up: why were there only 15 games played that year??
Career Statistics in Pittsburgh:
44 of 109 (40.4%); 548 yards; 6 TDs; 4 INTs; 59.7 QB Rating
Best Year in Pittsburgh:
34 of 74 (45.9%); 438 yards; 5 TDs; 2 INTs; 76.3 QB Rating
RICK STROM:
Who the hell is Rick Strom? Well, not a prolific QB, that's for sure. Remember when I wrote about Art Rooney last week and mentioned that he had a propensity to draft local players? Perhaps that's why Strom found his way on to the Steelers squad (he was born in the Steel City) beginning in 1989 following his collegiate career at Georgia Tech. Strom would never start a game in any of his five years in Pittsburgh, throwing just 22 total passes, with 0 TDs and 1 INT.

A fine citizen whose achievements off the field
dwarf his contributions in football
Career Statistics in Pittsburgh:
14 of 21 (63.6%); 162 yards; 0 TDs; 1 INT; 66.9 QB Rating
*************************
Next up - The 1990s of the Bill Cowher Era: Neil O'Donnell, Jim Miller, Mike Tomczakl, Kordell Stewart, Mike Quinn
21 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
GREAT
Great job my friend. What’s really sad is Dan Marino’s name should have been included , Since He played at Pitt , but the Steelers didnt draft Him !
glad you liked it
God knows this is taking much longer than I was anticipating, all to just rehahs some meh memories of yesteryear. What they hell though, these are the absolute dog days of the offseason.
QB
Is it sad that Brister is the only guy on this list that I knew played for the Steelers? Talk about a depressing era of QB play in the Steel Town.
I’ll try and do better once we get to the 90’s.
Bono and Brister
I didn’t realize until recently that Bono ever played for the Steelers.
I would have to say that until Kordell (before he imploded), Brister was my favorite Steeler QB since Bradshaw. Must be because I new the team wasn’t great, but he was tough guy. Part of that must have been that Malone replaced Bradshaw, and I was still under 10 years old. Brister did help get us that Wild Card win over Houston (must have been 89). I also remember how, in 90, the Steelers were 9-6 going into the final weekend, leading the Bengals and Oilers by a game (or maybe Cleveland was 8-6, too). But, of course we lose, and Bengals win the division at 9-7. That was when I was really starting to follow football closely. I had to take a break after SB XXX, though. I don’t think I followed the NFL as closely again until after SB XL.
by WolfpackSteelersFan on Jun 10, 2008 3:31 PM EDT reply actions
Brister & The Rest
Brister was the first QB since 12 that had the will to win and the moxie to pull it off. The problem was he was lacking in the athletic gifts of other QB and so were many of the players around him. Agree with Wolfpack that 6 was a tough guy. Came into Latrobe in 89 and wrote on the blackboard “playoffs 89” then pronounced to the media that he would be the starting QB that year. After a 0-2 start the Steelers were outscored 92-10 Chuck Noll pulled off the coaching coup of all time. He led this team QBed by Brister to Houston for a playoff game. For you youngsters out there this game included the second greatest play in Steelers history after the Immaculate Reception and before The Tackle. With the Oilers driving for the winning score in OT and in Steelers territory Rod Woodson comes up from the secondary and separates the Oiler RB (someone help me with the name!) from the ball. Myron Cope coins it “The Heavenly Hit” as Woodson recovers the fumble he caused and returns it into Oiler territory. Young Gary Anderson strides onto the field and boots a 51 yard FG to win in OT. The following week Brister, Hoge and Worley have the Bronco’s on the ropes for the right to go to Cleveland for the 89 AFC Championship game. Elway scores with under 2 minutes left to take a 24-23 lead into the final minutes. Rookie C Dermontti Dawson can’t cope with the altitude and takes himself out. The reserve C snaps a low one into Bubby’s ankles and Denver recovers and goes on to beat the Browns for the AFC behind Elway.
I rank Blackledge right above Woodley and below Campbell. Bono was the strike QB in 87 explaining the game shortage. He was 2-1 thus a god among Steelers QB since Bradshaw. Strom did a great job holding the clip board. None could compare with the mediocre exploits of Brister. To tell you how starved Steelers fans had become waiting for a worthy successor to 12 that in 1992 I got a black lab from the LA pound, backed Brister in the QB battle with Horse Face O’Donnell and named the mutt Brister. Best damn dog I ever had!
When You Run The Ball Good Things Happen
Yeah, I always felt Brister could have been a successful QB if he was on a team with talent around him. Unfortunately, he didn’t have much, at least on offense. Merrill Hoge was the leading rusher most of his time there. I think Hoge was the FB, not the HB. I liked Hoge, too. He was another tough guy that just didn’t have the skill to carry a team. Oh, well.
by WolfpackSteelersFan on Jun 10, 2008 5:57 PM EDT up reply actions
lol
Funny about the dogs.
Thanks for sharing. This is what I was hoping for when I decided to do this.
by Michael Bean on Jun 10, 2008 6:01 PM EDT up reply actions
Rick Strom
The only reason I know his name he was the back up QB of the Steelers in Super Tecmo Bowl. That may be his biggest claim to fame. He was better in the game than on the field.
Brister/O'Donnell
I agree with the previous posters that stated that Brister had heart, toughness, moxie…
As 5020 mentioned, the Steelers had the Broncos on the ropes in the 1989 playoffs. In fact, they were leading most of the game. After the Broncos went ahead late in the game 24-23, Brister was moving the team down the field, alternating runs up the middle with curls to Lipps. Unfortunately Mark Stock dropped a perfect pass that would have converted a third down and then the center botched the snap on 4th down. Game over.
That loss was not Brister’s fault. He played much better than anyone expected. Heck, it wasn’t the teams fault. The Steelers overachieved. Hoge left it all out on the field. I guess we could blame Mark Stock, but he was freaking Mark Stock, not Lynn Swann or Hines Ward.
This was a characteristic of the few Steeler playoff teams in the 1980s. They didn’t have the talent that they had in the 70s, but they still had some warriors. (The 70s teams aren’t given enough credit for this. Sure they were stacked with talent. But they also had players who could perform in the playoff spotlight.) When they lost, it was because they simply weren’t good enough. That is why the team could play so well in the playoffs in 1984 and 1989, or hand the 49ers their only defeat in the 1984 season, but then they couldn’t beat other teams consistently.
Unfortunately, while the talent level improved under Cowher in the 90s/00s, we didn’t have many players who had that special quality that it takes to win in the postseason. (Ward was/is a notable exception.) That’s why we had so many postseason flameouts under Cowher (I am not exonerating Cowher of blame, as he a big hand in shaping the team.)
One shining example of this was O’Donnell. No doubt he was more talented than Brister. More accurate? Yes. Fewer interceptions? Definitely. But his playoff performances were usually mediocre. The only playoff game where I thought that he delivered a playoff worthy performance was the loss the KC in 1993. His other playoff performances, including the games that the team won…very forgettable. And when your qb plays mediocre football, it makes it hard to go far in the postseason.
nice thoughts
Yeah unfortunately, I could not speak very authoritatively about thse QBs. Makes sense that Brister had all these intagibles y’all speak of, otherwise he probably wouldnt have stuck around in the league as long as he did. I was just too young to appreciate things like grit and moxie at the time. As Tomlin would say: ‘Thats just the reality of it’
Can’t fault me for being young, but I really appreciate you guys filling in the gaps where I fell short. Particularly informative thoughts steeler1275. Cheers.
by Michael Bean on Jun 11, 2008 6:41 AM EDT up reply actions
Always Thought
that if Cowher would have chosen Brister instead of Horse Face in the 1992 QB derby in Camp the Steelers might have won a SB before XL. They had home field through out in 92 and Brister had started the last 3 games for the injured Nag but was replaced in the playoff game against Buff. Kelly out dueled O’Dufus in that game 28-3. Think Bubby would have made us more competitive.
Also agree with you 1275 that even in the Nags playoff wins he usually played under par and had the Steelers in position to possibly lose. (95 AFC Championship he puts up 13 points on the Colts until Ernie Mills makes a circus catch late to set up a Bam score in a 20-16 win) as well as your thesis on the 90’s Steelers shrinking in the light of the big game.
When You Run The Ball Good Things Happen
Cowher's playoff record
You know, now that you bring it up, I wonder if Brister might not have been a better QB than O’Donnell. I guess what I’m wondering is this: Were Cowher’s teams more talented, and would Brister have stepped up with better teams? I don’t know. But, here’s the thing that always had me in Cowher’s corner. He replaced Noll after a decade of mediocrity. The Steelers did make it to that AFCC game only to get killed by Marino’s Dolphins, but for the most part, the defense was solid, but the offense in the 80s and early 90s was putrid. As soon as Cowher came in, the Steelers almost immediately challenged for the top of the conference for the next 5 years. The team Cowher won so many games early on had many of Noll’s players, so was Cowher getting more out of that team than he should have in the regular season? Or, was the team that good, and they just choked on the big games? If Noll had stuck around for another 5 years, would he have recreated the magic of the 70s? Or, did Cowher get more out of those players than Noll?
by WolfpackSteelersFan on Jun 11, 2008 5:24 PM EDT up reply actions
Noll
The Emperor Chas Noll is my all time favorite coach of all coaches. ( Pat Riley second and Danny Murtaugh third) Have to admit it was time he “got on with his life’s work.”
I think Cowher took Noll’s players plus some great draft picks and molded them into the 90’s powerhouse. Brister would have been a better QB for Cowher than 14. The Steelers players did choke on big games especially their Coach (always liked him though) and QB.
When You Run The Ball Good Things Happen
Reply to Cowher's playoff record by WolfpackSteelersFan
Wolfpack,
You bring up some interesting points. FWIW, here’s my take on why Cowher succeeded immediately upon taking over a mediocre Noll team:
1. Although Noll had legendary drafts in the early mid 70s, his drafts for the most part were mediocre in the late 70s, and also in the early to mid 80s. I don’t know why that is exactly. Loss of scouts? The rest of the NFL probably had caught up to the Steelers? Law of averages? I don’t really know the reasons.
2. I think a lot of the Noll players that Cowher inherited in 1992 were just entering or were in their prime.
This would include Noll drafted players such as Rod Woodson (1987), Greg Lloyd (1987, hampered by injury previously), Hardy Nickerson (1987), Dermontii Dawson (1988), Carnell Lake (1989), Jerry Olsavsky (1989), Carlton Haselrig (1989), Eric Green (1990), Neil O’donnell (1990), Barry Foster (1990), Justin Strzelczyk (1990), and Ernie Mills (1991).
Cowher’s first draft class in 1992 included Leon Searcy, Levon Kirkland, Joel Steed and Darren Perry.
That’s an impressive core of players that all had 5 years of experience or fewer entering Cowher’s rookie HC year. Think about how many Pro Bowls that group totalled in their careers.
3. Cowher/Lebeau/Capers implemented a style of defense (zone blitz) that was new to the NFL.
4. The AFC central division was much less competitive than it had been in the 80s. In the mid to late 80s, you had the Kosar led Browns, the Esiason led Bengals and then the Moon led Oilers. But by 1992, only the Moon led Oilers were any good. And even though I thought that those Oiler teams could/should have been very formidable, history showed that those Oilers never really won a meaningful game. They couldn’t beat the very mediocre Brister led Steelers in the 1989 playoffs at home, they were blown out against the Bengals in the 1990 playoffs, they blew a 21-6 lead against the Broncos in the 1991 playoffs, they blew that 35-3 lead against the Reich led Bills in the 1992 playoffs, they lost to a very ordinary Chiefs team in the 93 playoffs, etc.
So in summary, I do think that some things fell in place for Cowher (weak division, young nucleus of talent coming into their own) and I also think that he deserved some credit (92 draft, zone blitz) as well for turning it around.
But I don’t think that the Steelers overachieved under Cowher. As I listed above, the team had talent. They didn’t have 70s talent, but they had talent.
This is how my view of Cowher and the 90s Steelers evolved over the years.
In 1992, when they lost to Buffalo, I wasn’t upset. Even if Brister was the qb, the team would have lost to Buffalo. Buffalo was the better team for the most part. I was happy with the energy that Cowher had brought to the team that year. Honestly, I thought that that year the Steelers really were not deserving of having the #1 seed in the AFC playoffs. But I thought that the future was bright.
In 1993, I was very upset when they lost to KC in the playoffs. Of course there was the dropped pass on 3rd down by Jeff Graham late in the game, who made a habit of dropping passes which could have helped salt away the clock, followed by the blocked punt, etc. But I chalked the loss up to a maturation process that the team probably needed to go through. Heck, in 1972, the Steelers should have beat the undefeated Dolphins in the playoffs, but they didn’t when they allowed the Dolphins to execute a fake punt.
In 1994 though, there was no excuse for losing to the Chargers. They were playing at home, they took a quick 7-0 lead, and they were clearly the better team. The Steelers should have won that game by double digits. It should never have come down to that 4rth and 3 at the end. Of course, Neil O’donnell still could have won the game at the end, but he locked onto Foster on that final play, and never looked for other options even though he had time and it looked like there was no real window to get Foster the ball. This was when I first started to seriously question O’donnell as a championship caliber qb.
In 1995, the Steelers were not as good as the 94 version, but they lucked out when they got to play a Bills team without Bruce Smith followed by a decimated Colts team in the AFCCG. (If you remember, Marshall Faulk was out, as was their 2nd string rb, Zach Crockett.) While they handily beat a declining Bills team, they really should have lost to the Colts. After that pitiful display against an undermanned Colts team, I really didn’t expect the Steelers to beat the much mightier Cowboys in the Super Bowl, although I did think that Barry Switzer was a moron. But as we all know, that game was there for the taking. If the Steelers hadn’t started that game so slowly (we were lucky not to be blown out actually) and if O’donnell had played better (even his completions were often due to his wr making great catches), we could have won the Super Bowl.
In 1996, I didn’t blame the Steelers for losing to the Patriots. I think every Steeler fan should have known that Tomszak wasn’t going to lead us anywhere. In addition, Bettis was hurt and Rod Woodson was not the same player coming back from his ACL.
In 1997, I thought that the Steelers and the Broncos were evenly matched going into the AFCCG. But basically, Elway made the necessary plays while Stewart didn’t. But after the 94 and 95 fiascos, I really didn’t expect the Kordell led Steelers to beat the Elway led Broncos.
In 2001, the Steelers laid another egg in the AFCCG. I know people will reference Spygate, but the Steelers lost because of special teams miscues and they couldn’t beat essentially a rookie qb in Tom Brady (he was actually in his 2nd year, but he didn’t play his rookie year). And of course, Kordell had two chances to lead the Steelers to the tying td at the end of the game. We know how those drives turned out.
In 2002, the Steelers could have beaten the Titans, but they were not a championship team, not with that pass defense and with Kendrell Bell hobbling.
In 2004, I don’t fault the Steelers for losing to the Pats. 15-1 and the regular season victory over the Patriots aside, Big Ben was a rookie qb and he was playing like it in the playoffs. They were lucky to have beaten the Jets the previous week.
In 2005, of course they won the Super Bowl. This was the first year that I saw a Cowher coached team play fearlessly in the playoffs, at least until the Super Bowl. I’m not sure if we played poorly in the Super Bowl because of Cowher or because Ben was choking in the spotlight in only his 2nd year.
So in sum, while I do credit Cowher for turning it around when he took over, I also think his teams choked in 94, 95 and 01. And they had a decent chance to win in 97, although I wouldn’t label that game a choke. And while upsets happen, Cowher’s teams missed out to too many favorable opportunities to be a coincidence.
The only saving excuse for Cowher is if you rationalize that he never had a championship caliber qb until he got Ben. When Ben had gained some experience, Cowher’s team played pretty well in the 2005 playoffs. But whose fault is that? Cowher never tried to acquire a top notch qb. He chose to let O’Donnell lead the team. When O’donnell left, he entrusted the team to journeyman Tomszak. When Kordell struggled, he brought in Kent Graham. Kent Graham!!! Then he tried to bring in Scott Mitchell in 2001. Scott Mitchell!!! Rumors are that he didn’t want to even draft Ben, and only did so when Rooney overruled him.
Sorry for the long post.
this is good stuff
I’d like ot use this on the main page. I’ll email you.
Thanks!
by Michael Bean on Jun 13, 2008 10:28 AM EDT up reply actions
Many great points
That was a great review of Cowher’s tenure. The only thing that really stands out in my mind, that you didn’t cover, is the fact that the Steelers lost so many FAs in the first years following the advent of the salary cap. I tried google to see if I could get the numbers, but I’m pretty sure that they lost 10-15 FAs every year for 3 years (1994-1996). That was the reason that I was never confident going into any season, because the team turned over so much in those years.
Anyway, thanks for the great answer. I see that Blitzburgh noticed it while I was typing (and having a work discussion:)). I thought this was good enough to be bumped up.
by WolfpackSteelersFan on Jun 13, 2008 10:54 AM EDT up reply actions
FA losses
I’m trying to remember who we lost of significance between 1992-1995. I’m sure we lost some players, but I’m not talking about bit players.
We did lose Hardy Nickerson after the 1992 season. And we lost Eric Green after the 1994 season. Merril Hoge. Did we lose anyone else over those years?
So, in my mind, the 94 and 95 teams hadn’t really been weakened by FA. And we had picked up a few players, like John L Williams, Kevin Greene, Ray Seals and Duval Love.
So I don’t think we can point to FA losses for the 94 and 95 teams.
Meanwhile, the 95 Cowboys had lost several key players from their 1992 championship team, although they did pick up Deion Sanders.
I agree that after the 95 season, the Steelers began losing multiple key players: Woodson, O’Donnell, Lake, Searcy, Thigpen, Chad Brown, John Jackson etc. (We didn’t lose all these players in the 95 offseason, but it began in the 95 offseason.) So I agree that the 1997 team could have been better if not for FA. And this led to the down years from 1998-2000.
By 2001, had we lost anyone of significance from the previous years that was still a prominent player in the NFL? Woodson was now a good safety for the Ravens. But he didn’t want to be a safety when he left the Steelers. Chad Brown was a good (but not great) lb in Seattle. But Neil O’Donnell, Carnell Lake, Yancey Thigpen, Charles Johnson, Leon Searcy et al weren’t exactly setting the NFL on its ear by 2001. We never really knew what to do with Mike Vrabel. Meanwhile, one of our comp picks had turned into Hines Ward. Wayne Gandy was a better player in 2001 than Leon Searcy or John Jackson.
So again, I don’t buy FA losses as an excuse for the 2001 team.
Again, if I’ve grossly overlooked some players, let me know. I am typing this off memory.
thats an impressive recalling
Of those years. I think you’re exactly right unless there’s some singificant names you’re overlooking. We’ll have to double-check, but on first glance, I think I’d agree we cant blame FA for those years.
by Michael Bean on Jun 15, 2008 1:18 AM EDT up reply actions
I don't know what I was thinking of then
It must have been the fact that after getting so close for a couple years in a row, then we began losing the FAs after 95. For some reason I was thinking the FA losses began earlier. Maybe it all just blurred together.
by WolfpackSteelersFan on Jun 16, 2008 10:18 AM EDT up reply actions
2001 team
I didn’t mean the 2001 team. They obviously choked. It was those mid 90s teams. I can’t remember the names, because it’s been so long, but I know that the Steelers lost more FAs early in Free Agency than any team I can remember. And, even if they’re not big names, that’s a lot of turnover over a three year period. Anyway, it doesn’t change what happened, so it’s not a big deal.
by WolfpackSteelersFan on Jun 13, 2008 3:50 PM EDT reply actions

by 















