Tomlin Must Trust His Instincts To Make Changes
Update:
If you're visiting BTSC for the first time from SI.com, be sure to check out the site's main page featuring an interview with former Pro-Bowler, VP of the NFLPA, and Steelers OL Tunch Ilkin.
Most of you know by now that I'm a Mike Tomlin fan. I would be supportive of whomever the Rooneys hired to coach the organization, but I also happen to believe that he has a tremendously bright future as a head coach in this league.
One thing that I believe is important - particularly in 2008 - is that he pulls the trigger on making personnel adjustments mid-game and mid-season. In most positions on the depth chart, this isn't too much of an issue. Willie Parker, Big Ben, Hines, Aaron Smith, et. al star players will, and should, start each and every game in which they are healthy and able to play.
But what about the offensive line? On the one hand, one must factor in the importance of continuity, and the time needed for 5 individuals to learn to play collectively as a unified unit. However, on the other hand, we've got a number of guys who are essentially in the same ballpark with each other talent wise.
Last year, Kendall Simmons, Willie Colon, and Sean Mahan all started 16 games. So too did Alan Faneca, but I don't think anybody could reasonably argue that he should have been swapped out for somebody else. But those other three guys, were undeniably our weakest links on the line last year. According to AOL Fanhouse, Simmons was responsible for 10 of our 57 sacks last year, Colon for 12, and Mahan for 6.5. Marvel Smith was responsible for 7, but if you remember, he allowed the majority of those 7 in one game last year before shutting it down for the year with his back injury.
The same logic can be applied to the defense as well. Clark Haggans, who shot out of the gate fast last year, also started 16 games, even though it was clear he had essentially run out of gas in the final quarter of the season and was contributing very little. Why the hesitancy to play LaMarr Woodley more?
Tomlin and offensive line coach Larry Zierlein are going to have to make some tough decisions later this summer when they decide on a final 53-man roster, and who should start along the offensive line and elsewhere. A guy like Sean Mahan may earn a starting spot, but if he's struggling early and often, I hope Tomlin does not keep the same approach of sticking with his starters too long. With Justin Hartwing, Mahan, Stapleton, Chris K, Kendall Simmons, and possibly even Willie Colon, all vying for a limited number of spots in the interior of our offensive line, the coaches will have the opportunity to tinker with a few different combinations of players if they choose. As I said, that's a risky proposition because of the paramount importance of continuity along the line. But the definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over again while expecting different results, no?
We'll see what happens, but our roster management, particularly in certain positions, should be another major benchmark by which we can better evaluate our new coaching staff.
1 recs |
13
comments
Comments
one more thing
I can understand why Tomlin might have wanted to have that approach last year. As a first year head coach, perhaps it would be have been abd for him to constantly making moves, making players unsure of their roles, and weary of his decision making. But a year later, I hope he approaches things differently if necessary.
by Blitzburgh on Jun 26, 2008 12:33 PM EDT 0 recs
Woodley
Woodley said that he still hadn’t learned all that he needed to know to play that position. But, it certainly seems that you would let him make his mistakes and learn from them, especially once Haggans had become unproductive. I remember seeing a clip of Cowher talking to Ben after he threw a TD in the Titans game (2005). Cowher was quizzing him on which defense they were in. Even though he threw a TD, he thought it was a different defense than it actually was. So, Ben was still learning on the job, and had a pretty darn good season doing it.
by WolfpackSteelersFan on Jun 26, 2008 1:07 PM EDT 0 recs
yea
I guess towardds the end of the season, it was too late to make a change. But maybe one of those midseason games when Haggans was starting to fade. Give him a week to rest up a bit, heal a bit, think about the fact that he’s getting manhandled during a contract year.
by Blitzburgh on
Jun 26, 2008 1:41 PM EDT
up
0 recs
My guess would be that Woodley was not close to ready by midseason. Also, they started out 9-3. Why would you change at 6-2, 7-2, 7-3, 8-3, or 9-3? It was the 1-3 finish that looked so bad. And, you don’t want to start looking like your panicking because of a couple of losses. I’m just throwing out what a HC might be thinking, especially a first year coach.
I know, even if it’s working, you still try to correct the weak spots.
by WolfpackSteelersFan on
Jun 26, 2008 2:19 PM EDT
up
0 recs
touche' Blitz
I man-crushed on Tomlin all of last season and looking back at the season, that was the area of his biggest struggles. The one guy that he did send to the bench b/c of bad play was Anthony Smith but there were certainly other guys who deserves a couple of series/games on the pine (Haggans, Mahan and Simmons). I’ll chalk his ‘long leash’ up to being a rookie head coach on a team stocked with veterans.
I hope he sticks to his mantra of competition. I honestly don’t care what the name of the back of the jersey says. If FWP or Ward or Big Snack isn’t pulling his weight and the backup is looking solid, that’s who should play. There’s nothing like pulling a guy out of a game and telling him to take a seat to get not only his attention but the entire team.
In Tomlin I Trust
by cgolden on Jun 26, 2008 1:08 PM EDT 1 recs
Head Coach
I was happy with decision to go a new direction and pick the breath of fresh air…Mike Tomlin. I have written that his first season was a successful first season. I have also written he is young and will need to improve in may facets most importantly game management and personnel decisions both player and coaching.
I agree with Blitz that his first season approach was what it needed to be. He didn’t want to alienate nor did he need to completely change a strong team one year removed from XL.
I expect big things from Tomlin. The biggest thing, a World Championship under his watch.
When You Run The Ball Good Things Happen
by 5020 on Jun 26, 2008 2:30 PM EDT 0 recs
Adjustments
Good read Blitzburgh. When Chuki Okobi was cut last camp I began scratching my head. After we got a good dose of Mahan, I really began scratching my head. Why was Okobi cut after he reportedly had a good camp? Whizz & Grimm snatched Chucki up. I’m not sure if Chucki took many if any snaps for the Steelers West during their regular season last year, but I do know he’s now unemployed. Did Tomlin & Zeirlein know Chucki’s playing days were over or close to being over and use his roster spot for someone else? It seems as though that may have played a part in their reasoning. There are just so many X factors involved for we fans as “outsiders” to accurately judge why decisions are made. All we can do is continue to speculate and trust the coaching staff and FO that their judgements are winning ones. It appears that making cuts this year is going to be extremely tuff. What a nice position to be in though.
by steelersrock08 on Jun 26, 2008 2:39 PM EDT 0 recs
Chucky
He was on the roster for 5 games (appeared in one) before being cut.
by cgolden on
Jun 26, 2008 2:51 PM EDT
up
0 recs
In addition to Tomlin's instincts to make player changes
If I could extend into next offseason, how will our new coach handle making assistant coaching changes? I think those are harder to make than player changes because you want badly to believe in your assistants since you are in their same fraternity. Who will be Tomlin’s first assistant coaching casualty? When will it happen? How will he handle it? And most important, will he be able to pull the trigger when the time is right?
by maryrose on Jun 26, 2008 5:17 PM EDT 0 recs
Good questions
After reading Dungy’s book, one thing that sticks out is that he was pressured to fire Mike Shula. He didn’t want to. I know he turned the franchise around and put them in a position to finally break through, but their offense was borderline pathetic most of his tenure. He kind of got lucky having Tom Moore already at OC in Indy.
by WolfpackSteelersFan on
Jun 26, 2008 5:43 PM EDT
up
0 recs
No worries
I trust that Tomlin will have full confidence to make depth chart decisions. He knows that if you dont win in this league you wont be around long, so you cant waste time on players that arent producing.
by SteelerDomination on Jun 26, 2008 7:14 PM EDT 0 recs
Good job Blitz
Agree with most of what has been said, but a couple of comments.
Has anyone considered that a factor in Haggans dropoff was the loss of Aaron Smith on that side of the line? Are you gonna focus on stopping Eason or can you afford to put a little extra effort into neutralizing Clark?
I think Maryrose’s point on asst coaches is intriguing. My take is that the judgement on new systems sometimes takes more than a year. A number of people in the organization are on record as saying that everyone was not entirely comfortable with the new system. As fans it’s understandable that we might be frustrated because we see largely the same group of players that we have been rooting for and intuitively believe that they should be playing well together. But how wise would it be to start firing people and changing systems before the players are absolutely familiar and comfortable in it? I think that Tomlin not pulling the trigger (at least for now) is a good sign.
by RickVa on Jun 26, 2008 8:05 PM EDT 0 recs
Haggans
Smith didn’t go down for good until the 13th game of the season against New England. Haggans started out with 3 sacks in his first four games but only had one sack in the next eight before Smith went down. In the two games in the middle of the season that Smith missed (Cincy & Baltimore), Haggans had half a sack. I’m sure it didn’t help having the duo of Kirschke and Eason on the field but it wasn’t the reason his sack numbers started to plummet.
by cgolden on
Jun 27, 2008 11:14 AM EDT
up
0 recs











