Who is Stanley Druckenmiller?
By now most or all of you have read about Stanley Druckenmiller, a 55-year old hedge fund manager, who is strongly rumored to soon own at least a small piece of the Pittsburgh Steelers, if not a whole lot more. Id like to summarize what has been floating around the last few days, in print and in talk, about Druckenmiller and his potential involvement with the Steelers.
Druckenmiller was a college whiz kid at small and prestigious Bowdoin College in Maine after moving several times as a child. Shortly into his doctorate aspirations at the University of Michigan, Druckenmiller left that behind to make some money, some real serious money. He moved to Pittsburgh to work for PNC and then started a company called Duquesne Capital Management at the tender age of 28, which still has an office in Upper St. Clair. Along the way he teamed with George Soros, a widely-known international investment guru and the two of them struck gold together. In just one day in 1992, betting that the British pound would drop, Druckenmiller and Soros made a billion dollars.
The Druckenmiller Science Center at Bowdoin College
Druckenmiller now lives in New York and spends a great deal of time as CEO of Harlem Children's Zone, which helps thousands of poor families in an area that needs it most. But his heart never left Pittsburgh. Make no mistake, Druckenmiller is a Pittsburgh guy. Having moved around a lot as a kid he never established any roots or any great rooting interest for a particular football team. Pittsburgh has changed all that. Druckenmiller is a season-ticket holder and flies into Pittsburgh for all the home games. He still golfs regularly at Oakmont. This billionaire worth 3.5 billion, ranked 91 among Forbes Top 400 Americans, paints his face black and gold, wears a Troy Polamalu jersey and tailgates in the parking lot. How do you top that passion?
The Harlem Children's Zone is one of many charitable causes
Druckenmiller is involved in
Since his move to Pittsburgh, Druckenmiller has had a dream about owning the Steelers, at least in part, but has also been loyal to the franchise enough to know that the Rooneys are the Steelers and his respect has caused him to never cross that line. It was the Rooneys who approached Druckenmiller, not the other way around, regarding the recent discussions about him becoming part of ownership.
Luxurious yet tasteful. And more importantly, in Pittsburgh, where
a potential owner of the Steelers should be.
You probably have heard that a driving force in all this is that three of the Rooney brothers, Tim, Pat and John, are owners of racetracks in New York, Florida and Maryland that now include casino gambling. This is in direct violation with NFL policy and that is the reason for an alteration of Steelers ownership. Each of the five Rooney brothers (Dan and Art Jr. being the other two) own 16 percent of the Steelers (The McGinley family, having married into the Rooneys two generations ago, owns the other 20 percent). Figuring the Steelers are worth about $930 million, each brother owns about $150 million of the club.
True, the gambling issue is real and former NFL Commissioner Paul Tagliabue is even involved now in trying to broker all of this. Dan Rooney has publicly talked about the gambling issue and NFL compliance. Casino-type gambling is unacceptable to the league (though dog and horse racing seems to be acceptable). There are also other NFL matters to be considered. The first is that the league wants at least a 30 percent majority owner. The Rooney brothers each own only 16 percent, but have been grandfathered in to this point. The second is that no franchise can go into debt more than $150 million. Dan has that hanging over his head also.
However, restructured ownership would still be an issue very soon even without the gambling factor. Dan and his son Art II are the operators of the team, but as long as this continues that means that the other four brothers have no impact on the team and also cannot reach any of their $150 million share of the franchise. This is OK for the moment, but the Rooney brothers are getting up in age and this would be impossible to continue into the next generation. You can't blame the four brothers for wanting to liquidate. You also can't blame them for the timing. Word on the streets is that if Obama gets elected in November the Capital Gains Tax is going to skyrocket. The Rooney brothers want to have the next generation established before the election.
Dan cannot buy out his brothers since he doesn't have a spare $780 million laying around. Dan is rich in the sense that he owns $150 million of an NFL franchise, but he is not cash-rich other than what he pays himself from the team. Outside money needs to be infused. There's really no other way to appease the four brothers of Dan.
Enter Stanley Druckenmiller. Pittsburgh Steelers fans are very lucky to have among them a fan genius who attends all the home games. By the way, Druckenmiller doesn't sit up in a cushy loge box. He is among the crowd and the elements and high fives anyone around him when the Steelers make a good play.

Drukenmiller, pictured on the far left, has returned to Pennsylvania from New York, where his legendary stature as a Titan of Wall Street forced him to participate in the high-profile social life of New York City. Something tells me he's more comfortable around close friends in more private settings, like say, a Steelers game.
There are basically two ways in which Druckenmiller can become part owner of the Steelers. The first way would sit much more comfortably with most of us Steelers fans, and that is, Druckenmiller (or someone else) would buy out the three brothers owning race tracks and own 48 percent of the team. Dan and son Art II would find a way to buy out Brother Art and also the McGinley family and own the remaining 52 percent (or perhaps create a "Rooney Group" to accomplish the same thing). This way Dan would pass the team on to his son and the foreseeable future would have a Rooney owning (most of) and running the team. Druckenmiller would simply be a major investor.
The second scenario is more drastic and could occur if Dan cannot muster the finances to appease his brothers. In this case Druckenmiller could buy more than 48 percent, making him the head honcho. He has said that he really wants the Rooneys to continue to run the Steelers, but if he owns more than 50 percent it would be awfully awkward for Dan Rooney to essentially have a boss. Steelers fans can hardly comprehend this scenario.
We Steelers fans have an unconditional loyalty and commitment to the Rooney family. It just seems like the stars would be out of line with the universe if somehow anyone other than a Rooney was behind the curtain pulling all the levers, or at least approving what is being pulled. But keep in mind several thoughts to help you sleep.
First, this change, at least to some degree, is inevitable. Any Rooney not named Dan is not going to allow all his money to be tied up with an expensive toy from which his children gain no benefit.
Second, if anyone does need to come in, who better than a multi-billionaire who paints his face black and gold and is a current season ticket holder. To boot, the guy is just 55 years old and in the prime of his mental capacities. We could do a whole lot worse than Stanley Druckenmiller and really, not a whole lot better.
Third, while we love even the name Rooney, let's not forget that while Art Sr. was as lovable and loyal as could possibly be, the Steelers really weren't a successful operation until Dan took over in the late 1960s. Art seemed more interested in going to the races, schmoozing with local politicians, baseball and hiring old cronies as coaches. His son Art Jr. was run out by brother Dan in 1985 and we really don't know anything about Art II's instincts in running an NFL franchise. All we really know is Dan, and he is 76-years old.
Fourth, It is quite possible that having at least part ownership in the team, Druckenmiller might be willing to part with a few extra bucks each year and engage in the "cash-over-cap" escapades that Jerry Jones and Dan Snyder make an annual ritual. Druckenmiller's heart gets broken whenever the Steelers lose. That could bode well.
It must be emphasized that Druckenmiller is certainly not the only viable outside candidate to buy into ownership. In fact, the Rooney brothers (except Dan) have contracted Goldman Sachs to help identify the franchise's worth and also identify potential buyers. It may well come down to some type of bidding war. However, at the moment, the horse that is out of the barn right now is Stanley Druckenmiller, so we may as well feature him.
So, while we sit and wait, let's try to think of the big picture here and not panic. Not that we have any power to do anything about it anyway, but the bottom line is that the Steelers are going to remain in Pittsburgh for as long as the eye can see, and the franchise will be well run as always.
2 recs |
17 comments
Comments
McGinley's
I saw an interview with one of them who said at least the one McGinley sister (who holds half of the McGinley’s share herself) would not ever sell. So at least that 10% of the franchise is staying McGinley (which is really Rooney). Regardless, good stuff again ‘Rose, I too have done alot of reading on Druckenmiller, and while he is loaded rich and a passionate fan like Mark Cuban, he doesn’t seem like he would make rash decision (like the Jason Kidd trade this year)....if you remember the Mavs were actually really well managed under Cuban, until that disaster of a trade this year at least. I think Druckenmiller would be a great part owner for the team. I’m sure he’s going to be involved, be it buying some of the brothers, OR providing the financial backing for Dan & Art II to buy out the others.
by TheMostViolentTeam on
Jul 10, 2008 4:24 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
That's a pretty good summary of the situation
Thanks MR. Hey Blitz, how long before you get the Druckenmiller interview together? I wonder if he can throw a football 100 yards.
by BadMaafala on
Jul 10, 2008 4:32 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
lol
Every single time I googled his name, I spelled it like DruNKENmiller, not DruCKEN. Hard to erase those memories of such an amazingly mediocre football player.
by Blitzburgh on
Jul 10, 2008 5:03 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
what- no pics of him in the stands?
In some regards, the nfl isn’t really old enough to have generation after generation of owners. And in other cases, teams are bought and sold so quickly (or new franchises born) that even a second generation is unique. And as you have skillfully pointed out Rose, the Steelers as a success are Dan Rooney’s team. It is hard to say if other Rooney’s have the same skills- there is a love affair with horses that runs in the family and there were numerous bumblings before he took over. That isn’t a knock against the family or the Chief. But in many ways, Steeler fans have had a luxury from ownership based on Dan’s ability and his efforts not just for the team, but the nfl.
It’s an interesting issue, but there are other teams that either have completely owners too new to have a legacy or swirling rumors that the team might up and leave (jags and bills). I guess I am cautiously optimistic that the baton will be passed to the right person or the right party involved because Dan Rooney will be involved in that transition. As I am optimistic that the Steelers will one day replace Hines Ward with an equally talented, hard working player that I will pull strongly for. Time in the NFL is often a very fleeting thing.
by vherub on
Jul 10, 2008 5:12 PM EDT
reply
actions
1 recs
good thoughts
Pretty much where I come down on it.
by Blitzburgh on
Jul 10, 2008 5:41 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
pics
I looked for one of him at Heinz, but no luck :)
Hopefully these better than the boring ones in the newspapers of him leaning over a desk.
by Blitzburgh on
Jul 10, 2008 5:49 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
from what i've read
the McGinley family’s 20% is not for sale. It would be hard to comprehend anyone other than a Rooney as the owner of this team, and even though this guys sounds like a regular joe who made it big, I still don’t know how it will feel to say some other name than a Rooney when talking about an owner. Does the guy really paint his face? That’s pretty cool. I don’t know, I knew that someday this would come. Its just hard for me to fathom growing up around the Steelers and being a Rooney and not wanting to own them. I know that some of the brothers aren’t into it, but surely a kid or two of theirs would be interested. I know I’d be like ” Dad, seriously dude, just hand it off to me.” On the other hand, 150 million is a whole heck of a lotta bones. I’m sure its different for them, and I understand the rule about gambling and such.
One thing we can be sure of is there is no way this team will move. That’s reassuring.
by steelerark on
Jul 11, 2008 12:10 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
It sounds like
Rita McGinley’s 10% is not on the table, but the other 10% now owned by Jack McGinley’s kids is a definite maybe. It will be very interesting to see the pie chart when this is over and done.
by maryrose on
Jul 11, 2008 1:40 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Gambling
I still really do not understand the difference between dogracing and video poker. How is one form of gambling ok for the league but another is not? Video poker doesn’t even have anything to do with sports. This is bush… bush league..
I know that things change – but a world without the Rooney’s at the head of the Steelers is just not one that I want to be a part of. I also understand that statement might be unreasonable – but I don’t care.
by smashmouthsteel on
Jul 11, 2008 12:17 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
You are fundamentally correct
In that there is no discernable difference between dog/horse racing and casino gaming. This is just a wild guess, but I’m thinking that the reason the NFL considers them different is because enough owners had interests in some kind of racetrack, so it was simply convenient for them to draw the line there. They needed a line somewhere. What muddies the waters in recent times is the new infiltration of casino gaming into the racetrack venue. That contaminates the racing part of things, which arbitrarily has been blessed by the league. This is especially problematic for the Rooneys, whose tracks in Yonkers and Palm beach are part of the new wave casino/racetracks. Still, the whole gambling thing is a temporary facade to what would soon become a bigger problem anyway, which is that four brothers have a toy they don’t play with, worth alot of money they can’t get to. Estate planning is very big in this whole dliemma. Taxes to descendents could wipe out a major percentage of their inheritance. This needs to be done before the November election.
by maryrose on
Jul 11, 2008 1:55 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
horse racing vs. other gambling
Well, for one, as of several years ago, all online gambling was made illegal…EXCEPT horse racing. For some reason, the US Government is willing to protect that industry while still wagging their finger at other forms of gaming. Likely just to ‘prove’ they’re proactive about protecting Americans from themselves, or some crap.
The horse racing industry has a powerful, entrenched lobby whereas video gaming interests are far more renegade, new money type ventures with less cachet in Washington. My guess is that the NFL has more or less adopted the same inconsistent moralistic standards that the country has.
by Blitzburgh on
Jul 11, 2008 3:24 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Don't be entirely naive, BB.
The ban on non-horseracing online gambling was predominantly a gift to the American casino industry who was sick of seeing all that money being spent on offshore, online gambling instead of at their casinos. The horseracing exception was left simply because most of the online horseracing betting sites are actually based in the U.S.
Fundamentally, though, there’s one major “difference” between horse/dogracing and casino gambling: casinos often have sportsbetting. This may simply be a case of the NFL being as cautious as possible in preventing a conflict of interest and failing to notice that there are a lot of racetracks with slot machines. (This is, however, just a guess on my part.)
by HinesField on
Jul 11, 2008 4:43 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
no prob
I dont take it as condescending. I am interested in your point, but would like to read about that more. I’ll browse around and see if I can read up on it, or share some stuff if you have some material.
I dont quite see how making it illegal to place a bet online on an NFL game hurts the indian casinos. Maybe in the case of poker, but only casinos in Nevada carry sportsbooks anyway. As for other table games, nobody really plays them online anyway.
by Blitzburgh on
Jul 11, 2008 5:07 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
eh, sorry dude.
I didn’t intend to sound that condescending above. I blame it on being Friday.
by HinesField on
Jul 11, 2008 4:49 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Dan Rooney
While it’s sad to think of the Steelers being sold to someone not in the Rooney family, I think the key point made by maryrose and echoed by others is that Dan Rooney is the one member of the family most responsible for their success. And since he is about to turn 76 years old, he won’t be running the team much longer. Whoever takes over the team, whether it’s Dan’s son Art, Druckenmiller, or anyone else, is going to have a tough act to follow, and the Rooney name is no guarantee of ability or success.
Even if Dan is able to weather this storm and maintain a controlling interest in the Steelers, the same situation is likely to occur all over again soon, since he has nine children. I don’t think he would just pass the team on to Art and leave all of the other kids out of the inheritance, so either Art or someone else would have to buy out his siblings’ shares of the team. Eventually, someone who has more cash available, like Druckenmiller, will end up buying the team away from the Rooneys.
The bottom line is that whether it happens now or not, the Steelers will soon be run by someone other than Dan Rooney, and that makes me sad. I just hope that whoever takes over has the right combination of football knowledge, passion for winning, and commitment to the city of Pittsburgh to keep the team moving in the right direction. If that person is even half as successful as Dan Rooney, we’ll be able to continue to enjoy following the greatest franchise in the NFL.
(By the way, I just finished reading Dan Rooney’s autobiography that was published last year, and I highly recommend it. It was a fun read and learned a lot about the history of the Steelers, particularly the time period before all the Super Bowls in the 1970s. The story of how they drafted Johnny Unitas and then coach Walt Kiesling released him without even giving him a chance in training camp almost made me cry.)
by nycsteeler on
Jul 11, 2008 1:36 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Autobiography
Yeah, I just finished that recently too. IIRC, his son, Art, has been the president of the team since around 2002, and like Dan before him, he had taken over most of the day to day operations before actually being given the title. So, as long as that does not change, the team should be pretty stable from a management perspective for the next 20-30 years. I’m not sure about any other ownership issues with his own children or his brothers’ children. I guess his brothers’ children will not be in the equation if his brothers are bought out. So, the only issue will be his own children, and then grandchildren.
by WolfpackSteelersFan on
Jul 11, 2008 4:44 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Great Points
Everyone has made great points regarding the current situation. I guess the bottom line is that hopefully no matter who owns the team – the culture will remain intact!
by smashmouthsteel on
Jul 11, 2008 2:20 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs









