Steelers Training Camp Primer, Vol. 1 - Position Battles To Watch
On July 27th, your Pittsburgh Steelers will report to Latrobe, PA to kick off the start of the 2008 season. We'll delve into full anticipatory coverage of camp in the forthcoming weeks, and do our best to provide us with solid coverage of how things shake out in Latrobe, but for now, let's start with a discussion on what I think should be the most interesting developments of the Pittsburgh Steelers 2008 Training Camp and preseason.
1) Max Starks, Marvel Smith, and the rest of the Steelers Offensive Line
Let's just get this one out of the way and start by saying that I can't wait to see how Starks and Smith look once the pads go on. In the case of Starks, I sure hope we see a bull in the china shop mentality from him from Day 1. In the case of Marvel Smith, I'll feel much, much better about our season if he seems to be entirely void of the back issues that were plaguing him at the end of last year. As for the rest of the guys, there's no need to rehash everything that's been said since Hartwig was signed in free agency. I just hope Tomlin, Zierlein, and Arians all stick to the mantra: may the best man win.
2) What's in store for Dennis Dixon?
I've been meaning to mention this for awhile, though I'm not sure what it means, if anything, but Dennis Dixon is easily the most searched for player by Steelers fans on this site. We haven't spent much time discussing him and his future in Pittsburgh, so I doubt too many have come away satisfied in their search. Anyway, I suspect that most of those folks scouring for news and innuendos about Dixon are Oregon Ducks fans, who enjoyed multiple years of Dixon's unique abilities.
What role, if any, will he have on the 2008 Pittsburgh Steelers? It's not very likely that he'll situate himself ahead of Charlie Batch on the depth chart. But it is possible that we see plenty of him during the preseason games to come away sufficiently impressed and convinced that he'll be in the #2 slot in 2009. But, is it also possible that we discover that the coaching staff has other plans to get him involved this year? I sure loved the way we mixed in a gadget play or two during the final years of the Ken Whisenhunt era. Other than the Cedric Wilson 2-pt conversion pass against Jacksonville, I can not recall another instance in which he tried something tricky last year. Might Dixon be the guy we use to shake things up?
3) The Defensive Backfield
We know Ike Taylor, Troy Polamalu, Deshea Townsed, and Bryant McFadden will all see the field and be the primary components of our secondary, provided they're all healthy. What about Ryan Clark, though? Reports confirm he looks good thus far this offseason and should be just fine in 2008. But, again, pads have not yet been put on. What about William Gay? I kinda like the look of the kid. Will he impress in camp and the preseason and work his way into some dime and nickel packages? And what about Anthony Smith and Tyrone Carter? An. Smith is likely going to be an integral part of our defense, but Carter could very well be beat out for a spot, despite counting very little against the cap. Finally, we know Mike Lorello won't be around, but what about Ryan Mundy, Travis Williams, and the other rookies we have. Will any of them stick?
4) The Return Game and Special Teams
There was an article earlier this offseason about the deliberate decision made by Tomlin to spend less time and energy in practice on special teams. For a team that fared poorly for the most part on special teams last year, that seems strange to me, but these are the coaches decisions must make, and for now, I'll just have to assume that Tomlin has a plan.
Who will return punts and kicks for us this year? One would have to imagine that we'll tip our hand during camp and during the preseason. Other than Mewelde Moore fielding punts, your guess is as good as mine as to who might also get a stab as a PR, and who Tomlin and Ligashesky will opt to go with on kick returns. That's enough speculating for now on this subject, but it's worth mentioning that this also ties into....
5) Who Will Win That 5th WR Spot
If Willie Reid, or Kevin Marion can prove themselves enough in the return game, they maybe, just maybe, can sneak onto the squad as the 5th WR. Obviously, that 5th WR won't have his number called much, if at all, as a WR, provided the guys in front of him stay healthy. But if neither of them show enough, the competition may be between Dallas Baker and Micah Rucker. Willie Reid deserves mentioning here for that 5th spot, more so than Rucker in the minds of most fans and reporters. I'm not one of them, really. I personally think that Reid better be rock solid on special teams this camp or he'll be let go. My feelings don't mean much though, so let's just consider many to be in the mix right now, making this internal competition interesting, if not overly critical to the success of the team.
Anyway, many feel Baker has the leg up right now, and I wouldn't disagree. But that theme of 'let's wait till the pads go on' rings true here as well. Baker's yet to prove his meddle when contact's involved. I'll be curious to see how this shakes out.
Others:
Can Kyle Clement make the team and add youthful depth along the D-line?
Can Tony Hills give us reason to hope that, with or without Marvel Smith, our offensive line is in better shape moving forward than we might think?
How hard will Tomlin work the guys, knowing what he now knows about burnout late in the season?
Wil Keyaron Fox, Bruce Davis, and any of our other young additions give us the energetic and sure-tackling head-hunters on special teams that we so sorely missed last year?
Will Jeff Reed leave his clothes on?
Discuss.
0 recs |
31
comments
Comments
Bring it on
Training camp can’t get here fast enough.
1 – I’ve made a vow not to talk OL till the pads go on and I’m struggling to bite my tongue.
2 – I hope we see some Slash with Dixon but the coaching staff has downplayed it so far. Secret weapon, maybe?
3 – I can’t wait to see Gay, Anthony Smith and McFadden. Gay looked great in preseason as rookie, Smith needs to take major steps to ensure this isn’t his final season in Pitt and McFadden is playing for $$$ (always great motivation).
4 – I’ve also made a vow to tout Kevin Marion every time we talk kickoff return, so GO Marion.
5 – Early money is on Baker and that’s ok with me, although Truth’s take on Rucker has me interested.
by cgolden on Jul 2, 2008 12:47 PM EDT 0 recs
I think I read that the 5th WR spot was mainly between Baker and Reid.
by Cols714 on Jul 2, 2008 1:49 PM EDT 0 recs
thank you
Forgot to include that. I’m going to edit now. He’s very much in discussion for that return and WR job. More so than Micah Rucker in fact, though i do think he might still be around when the first preesaon game starts.
by Blitzburgh on
Jul 2, 2008 2:47 PM EDT
up
0 recs
I also hope that Starks wins the RT spot, but I’m not holding my breath. And don’t forget the competition between Hartwig and Mahan. If Mahan is starting a center again, we could be in real trouble.
by Cols714 on Jul 2, 2008 1:49 PM EDT 0 recs
Jeff Reed
Loved the last question. Not sure that I care much about the answer, as long as (1) he keeps making FGs as consistently as he did last year and (2) I don’t have to see any of the pictures.
Actually, I do have a question about Reed…with all of our struggles in kickoff return coverage, which could be partially due to Reed’s short kickoffs, what do you guys think about giving Sepulveda a chance to kickoff during camp or preseason? I don’t know if he’s ever done it before, but he seems to have a stronger leg than Reed. If Reed continues to be the guy, as is likely, I hope he’s working on that aspect of his game, because it could have a huge impact on our special teams if he is able to get kicks high and deep with more consistency.
by nycsteeler on Jul 2, 2008 2:16 PM EDT 0 recs
Reed can kick.
At the beginning of last season, he was pounding them into the end zone regularly. Then he suddenly stopped.
I wouldn’t be surprised, actually, if he was told to kick high and short because our special teams coverage was so goddamned awful.
by HinesField on
Jul 2, 2008 2:43 PM EDT
up
0 recs
true that
We were pooch kicking kickoffs late last year! That’s so embarassing to me. That’s conceeding defeat. Maybe it made sense at times last year, but even though it minimizes the risk of a big run, it still puts them within 2-3 first downs of our territory and FG range.
by Blitzburgh on
Jul 2, 2008 2:54 PM EDT
up
0 recs
It basically is conceding defeat.
But, I guess there are two things to keep in mind. First, our special teams was REALLY bad. Second, we did have one of the best-if not THE best-defenses last season. That had to be a factor for Tomlin to consider.
Fundamentally, what happened when they didn’t pooch it? Reed pounds it inside the 5 yard line and Jones-Drew returns it 95 yards.
Maybe conceding defeat is the right move, sometimes.
by HinesField on
Jul 2, 2008 3:10 PM EDT
up
0 recs
sometimes
But I hope that we don’t even consider until 6 games into the season. Let’s just start fresh and resolve the issue.
You’re right though. If it’s the right strategy, you gotta do it.
by Blitzburgh on
Jul 2, 2008 3:38 PM EDT
up
0 recs
I'll never forget
After we scored on a very impressive opening drive, the guy standing next to me kept repeating, “kick it out of bounds, kick it out of bounds.” I said, “Man, that’s pretty drastic, giving them the ball on the 40.” The guy looked at me and said, “Not as drastic as giving them everything back that we earned over a long drive.” Fifteen seconds later, with all the excitement sucked right out of Heinz Field like a giant ShopVac, I turned to the guy and said, “Buddy, you were right. I can’t believe it, but you were dead right.”
by maryrose on
Jul 2, 2008 3:41 PM EDT
up
0 recs
yea
That was BRUTAL when that happened. I thought we were in business after that early long TD drive. The MJD return sent me back to reality really quickly.
by Blitzburgh on
Jul 2, 2008 3:45 PM EDT
up
0 recs
Training camp, where are you?
Like cgolden said, training camp can’t get here fast enough. I want to comment on all of these questions, but we’re so much at the point where you just have to wait and see them in game situations. Well, here it goes, I’ll just see what comes to me:
1) I really believe that Hartwig is going solidify the center of line, if he doesn’t get beat out by Stapleton. I think that we have enough young, somewhat experienced G prospects, that we should be in good shape as long as the center isn’t on his back half the time.
2) Dennis Dixon – I don’t see great value in using him like the Seahawks have used Seneca Wallace. The brilliance of the trick plays with Ward, El, and even Wilson were that they were all part of the standard offense. When they came on the field, it wasn’t an automatic warning to everyone that something is up. Every time Seneca Wallace is on the field, the TV crew comments on it, wondering what to expect, and he hasn’t made a trick play yet. Now, Holmgren may be setting up to use that sometime down the road, but it’s been 2-3 years now, and he’s never done anything that I can remember.
3) I think the DBs are in good shape. The key will be keeping Troy healthy, but even when he was out, until the NE game last year, we didn’t have a huge dropoff. William Gay should work his way into some playing time. Mundy may replace Carter and become Clark’s backup.
4) I’m really hoping that Fox can improve our coverage units. From everything that we read about him, he was a solid backup LB, but an excellent ST player. I’d love to see him become a ST ace, like some of the guys from my college days: Steve Tasker, Bill Bates, etc.
5) I have little expectation that Bloom will do anything. I would love to see Marion turn into our Devin Hester or Josh Cribbs. Also, he’s small enough that it may keep other teams from raiding him from us as a WR, and he can be our star KR for the next decade.
If Hills and/or Clement can surprise and step up in a big way, that will go a long way to settting us up for next offseason. Hills would soften the blow of losing Marvel, Max, or both (hopefully not both). Clement would also add some much needed youth to our depth and possibly put himself in line to replace Aaron Smith once he starts to fall off.
Ok, so I guess I could find some things to say. :)
by WolfpackSteelersFan on Jul 2, 2008 2:23 PM EDT 0 recs
1- all of the offensive line talk this offseason has been extremely negative. I can’t wait to see them actually hit some people and work together in preseason and also in training camp. for us not to make any serious moves via free angency and the draft, i personally feel confident in what the line will shake out to be this year but only time will tell. i see ht eline being marvel, kemeotu, hartwig, simmons and max starks. i hope they realized what a waste mahan was
2- it seems the Steelers plan on using dixon as quarterback only, not so much like slash was used. i don’t think that makes much sense given that batch is solid already. they have to throw in a couple packages for him this year and get him on the field. this was the likely heisman winner until he was injured last year. i would like to see him in some red zone packages. specifically inside the 10 yard line range.
3- as far as the defensive backfield, i think they will come together very well this season just like last. polamalu’s back to his old training methods which hopefully keep him healthy. ike taylor is a great athlete but it would be nice to see a few more int’s out of his many chances that he gets his hands on the ball. a. smith got in a little over his head last year but i think he knows what is necessary now to be successful, i like his energy and agressiveness. i think william gay is a very smart player who will find some quality time on the field. carter should be kept around merely for the fac that he is cheap and a great back up, he doesn’t hurt us when in. i don’t see clark making a full recovery but you never know
4- the special teams were very disappointing last year and hopefully they find some ways to cover a kick a hell of a lot better. i don’t get spending less time on them though, but i’m not an nfl coach
5- as far as teh 5th receiver, i would like to see jeremy bloom return to his college form and be a force in teh return game. moore will be solid and won’t mess up, but i like the chance we get with bloom taking it back and changing games. i’m exciteed to see this position fill out
by mooski on Jul 2, 2008 2:24 PM EDT 0 recs
Welcome to BTSC
I must say, as first posts go, that’s not bad. There’s always room for well-informed, balanced opinions here.
by BadMaafala on
Jul 2, 2008 2:34 PM EDT
up
0 recs
thanks, i’ve been following this site for awhile now and figured it was time to give some input. i have never been as excited for a season as i am for this year. we’re flying uder teh radar right now with the browns being the hot pick but i like our 90% winning against them over the past 10 games. the schedule is tough on paper, but i honestly believe we have a legit shot at one for the other thumb
by mooski on
Jul 2, 2008 2:47 PM EDT
up
0 recs
Alright, some training camp talk...
I’m pumped. I’m actually going to get to go to training camp this year. A friend is getting married somewhere around there on August 2nd, so we’ll stick around and go to practice that Sunday.
I’ll agree with Cols that the real battle is between Reid and Baker. I read somewhere that Ben said both of them have had good off-seasons (Lolley maybe?). Both have legit shots at that spot, even though its starting to look like Reid won’t make it as a returner. As the Legursky cut has shown us, we have to be careful judging UDFA’s on numbers. I’m sure all the other teams looked at Rucker’s numbers before not drafting him, so it’s not like we have some insider knowledge that they didn’t. I haven’t heard much out of him from OTA’s, so I’d be happy but surprised if he made the team.
I have heard Marion’s name mentioned several times, though, so I’d give him some chance of making the team as a KR.
Who knows what’s going to happen on the OL, but most people closer to the team seem to think it will be a rather uncreative solution. The center battle may be the most competitive.
I also read that article about ST, and I don’t think it’s going to make things worse. Remember last year’s training camp when they brought out all these toys and stuff? That obviously didn’t help. I’d rather just have regular practices, with occasional intense coverage drills. I think we just need to get some personnel who are pumped about playing ST’s and we’ll at least be decent at kick coverage.
Finally, I hope ‘tonio doesn’t get a real look at a PR/KR. He was awful as a rookie, and he’s too valuable (and fragile) as a WR to waste him back there. If he makes it through a whole season without getting injured, then I’d start thinking about finding more snaps for him.
by BadMaafala on Jul 2, 2008 2:26 PM EDT 0 recs
please god, let me wake up tomorrow and the season has started....
been a tough year for my sports teams. Steelers lost in Wild Card, Lakers lost in Finals, Penguins lost in Finals, and then a few days ago, my beloved Deutsche Fussball-Bund lost to Spain in the Euro Finals. There is NOTHING I hate more than 2nd place. I need the NFL season to start so I can officially reset. That being said, here are my thoughts
1) I think we are going to go from having question marks at tackle last year (with Smith injured and Colon inexperienced) to having two above average tackles (a healthy Smith is pro-bowl caliber, and Starks playing for a big contract). Hartwig and the Center competition will solidify from the inside out.
2) Agreed, I don’t think Dixon will be used for trick plays much. My idea if I was Steelers GM, let him develop into a solid #2, then trade him to someone who is in need of a QB and get some earlier round draft picks for him, or keep him as our backup, depending on how Ben’s health has shaped up to that point. If we are going to use trick plays Ward will become the passer now, but we don’t need alot of trickery with all the weapons we have.
3) Secondary should be excellent. Taylor continues his solid (albeit low INT total) coverage play, Townsend/B-Mac are excellent as #2/#3 options. Gay also looked very good. Anthony Smith should continue to improve. Not much input to add to the backup spots, but I wouldn’t be surprised to see Ty Carter let go, AFTER this season.
4) Special teams should be improved with Fox, Davis on the unit. I like not putting too much emphasis on it either, develop a culture of hunger about special teams should be Tomlin’s goal, and he has stated that it is. I think it started to just become mental with how much attention was on it last year and our guys got kinda psyched out about special teams. Remember, athletic competitions of any kind are largely a mental game. Physical ability just gives you the tools to bring your brain to war against others.
5) Baker sounds like he has the edge, and I think we should hold a spot for a KR beyond the 5th receiver, unless our 5th receiver can double as both. I like having 5 “quality” receivers.
by TheMostViolentTeam on Jul 2, 2008 2:50 PM EDT 0 recs
Dixon in Review.
I typically check in with the Steeler blogs, because Dixon gave a lot of Oregon Duck fans a mancrush this last year because we went into last season not having any clue how it would shape out. Maybe we would squeak out a 7-5 season. We didn’t even know who would be the starting QB. He was, without a doubt the most improved player in the country. With that being said, I thought I’d give an overview of Dixon for you guys.
‘05 Sophomore: Early in the season, Dixon would go out and play towards the end of the game to finish out a win. After Oregon’s starter, Kellen Clemens went down with an injury, he started, but split time 50/50 with another QB. Dixon was decent, and was good at making a play after the pocket collapsed, but he would have a cold run every game with a few back-to-back three-and-out, and often forced to make something happen out of nothing. Often times that would result in a minimal loss sack. He also didn’t take time to read the defense. He was very much a young player. As you’ll see in the stats, he had quite a few runs compared to the number of attempts.
Stats (As Starter; Final 4 Games)
Passing
Att: 84 Comp: 54 Pct: 64.7 Yds: 647 TD: 5 Int: 1 Rating: 151.3
Rushing
Att: 32 Yds: 77 Avg: 2.7 TD: 0
‘06 Junior Year: Dixon was named to be the full time starter going into ‘06. Oregon started the year 4-0, and he led a comeback win against Oklahoma, albeit controversial (Not on Dixon’s part, but officiating). The remainder of the season, Oregon was very hit-and-miss, and largely because of Dixon. He would come out one game, throw 3 TDs, and the next he would toss 3 INTs. Dixon’s inconsistency become less inconsistent, and more consistently bad. He made poor reads, and poor throws.,
He eventually lost the starting job, and either split time, or he didn’t play at all.
Stats
Passing
Att: 322 Comp: 197 Pct: 61.2 Yds: 2143 TD: 12 Int: 14 Rating: 120.7
Rushing
Att: 94 Yds: 442 Avg: 4.7 TD: 2
‘07 Off Season: Dixon finished his sociology degree with a 3.27 GPA, and he got drafted by the Atlanta Braves. (Hit .176 in 74 rookie league games). Meanwhile, Oregon got a new offensive coordinator and also changed their offense from a spread offense to a spread option offense. The coaching staff was unhappy with Dixon’s choice to forgo summer camp, and to play baseball, but Dixon learned a lot of humility and other skills playing baseball. (.174 AVG will do that). He came back, and dedicated to work very closely with the new offensive coordinator. But still, the fans were unsure of what the QB situation would look like. We saw that he had talent, but all his talent was overshadowed by his mistakes.
‘07 Senior Year: Many people saying Oregon would be lucky to even make a bowl game. Oregon came out to prove something in ‘07. Rather quickly, Dixon eased the minds of fans everywhere when he went 5 games, and 147 attempts before his first toss was picked off. It never mattered on the opponent, 95% of the time Dixon made the right read, and made the right choice. He has massive hands, which helped him pull off some amazing play-actions, or to pull back the ball flawlessly on the option read. Many people referred to him as a magician, because somehow he would convince the entire defense that someone else had the ball. Instead of forcing plays, he capitalized on the defense’s mistakes. This was not the same player from ‘05 or ‘06. As the season progressed, Oregon suffered major injuries. The backup (Split-time) RB, 2 backup QBs and 3 WRs, yet despite these injuries, Dixon still lead the Ducks to wins. Their only loss prior Dixon’s injury was against Cal, and it was in a very dramatic fashion. Dixon was even able to get the ball to the WR, for a chance, but he fumbled it out of bounds, in the end zone. Despite the loss, Oregon moved up in the polls – nearly unprecedented in college football. When Dixon went down with his injury, it was apparent that he was all that kept this injured team winning. It was the straw that broke the camel’s back. He remained traveling with the team, trying to teach and coach the young 4th and 5th string QBs, help keeping the team motivated. Despite his injury, he gave 110% from the sidelines, he even practiced with the team. Day 1 of the NFL Draft, he was at Oregon’s spring game, on the sidelines helping the team.
Stats
Passing
Att: 254 Comp: 172 Pct: 66.41 Yds: 2136 TD: 20 Int: 4 Rating: 159.5
Rushing
Att: 105 Yds: 583 Avg: 6.19 TD: 9
I don’t think you want Dixon as a slash QB. I don’t know if you even want him to be in a game the first season. He can make the trick plays work. (‘07 Oregon ran a couple variations of the Statue of Liberty; and Flee-Flickers in addition to the already tricky Spread Option Offense, but nothing out of the WR position.)
The Steelers did draft a quality person, and a talented player. He became one of those players that are hard to let go. I don’t know if he’ll have a good NFL career or not, but he has the capability. He is a very diligent and dedicated person. Possibly great trade bait in a year or two.
Go Duckies!
by JShufelt on Jul 2, 2008 5:57 PM EDT 1 recs
Great overview
Thanks for posting. That was a great, detailed description of Dixon’s growth in college.
by WolfpackSteelersFan on
Jul 2, 2008 6:14 PM EDT
up
0 recs
good stuff -- thanks for taking time
That was a heck of a statue of liberty play.
by cgolden on
Jul 2, 2008 6:35 PM EDT
up
0 recs
Dixon
I am not sold on Dixon at all. IMO, I still can’t believe we did not take RT-Carl Nicks from Nebrasksa…projections had him going in round 2 and he was still available in round 5!
With Hills going in fourth round, we would have 2 talented, young tackles in the fold (1 right tackle, 1 left tackle) to sit and wait a year and give us leverage on our OL situation for next year.
Oh well…FO had a different plan…
by SteelerMike on Jul 2, 2008 9:29 PM EDT 0 recs
this is soley my opinion
I think Nick’s actions shortly before the draft (arrest and conflicts w/ NEB coaching staff) caused to be almost completely removed from the Steelers draft board. I was interested in him after seeing him live but he was his own worst enemy off the field.
by cgolden on
Jul 2, 2008 10:46 PM EDT
up
0 recs
I honestly don't about the choice myself.
I’m glad Dixon didn’t get grabbed by some crappy team (Oregon QBs have a habit of that). You guys are probably a better gauge of the QB situation in Pittsburgh, but I thought it was a position well covered. I was slightly surprised with the Steelers’ draft choice too. It didn’t seem like a draft pick to fill a need.
I’m not sure what it would take to “sell” Dixon to you, but that’s okay. He might never set foot on the field in a Pittsburgh uniform. But regardless, he does have a lot of talent, and just might full out a few surprises.
Go Duckies!
by JShufelt on
Jul 3, 2008 3:30 AM EDT
up
0 recs
Thanks for the info
It’s always nice to get some first hand reports about draft picks. I was very surprised and disappointed with this pick at the time, because IMO, the only position we absolutely needed to pick at some point was DL. I felt like there were some decent options there, as well as along the OL, as Mike pointed out. Also, while Batch is getting old, I’d much rather us get a veteran QB who couldn’t quite make it as a starter, but knows the trade (aka Batch) than a young guys who’s either not going to make it or want a starting gig in a few years.
The pick has grow on me a little since then. I’m glad they don’t seem inclined to run him as a gadget guy, and realize he has to make it as a QB. Batch is getting older and didn’t play as well in 2007 as in 2006. Dixon seems like a high character guy, and your review of his senior season seems to be further evidence that he’s a hard worker, is intent on being a pocket passer, and can wait for the plays to open up instead of making the plays himself. Those three things, in addition to his natural athleticism, could add up to him being a viable #2 QB and possible future trade bait. We’ll see.
by BadMaafala on
Jul 3, 2008 9:23 AM EDT
up
0 recs
dixon's not appreciated
guy was just a few plays away from a Heisman and National Championship appearance. The Pac 10’s PATHETIC television deal hasnt given the country any exposure to the conference, outside of USC, who ESPN is in love with.
If we had any QB but Big Ben, I think we would be much, more intrigued. If we had Tommy Maddox, we’d be clamoring to get a glimpse of Dennis, but as is, we’ve got a franchise quarterback. We’ll see what happens, but the kid can play.
by Blitzburgh on
Jul 3, 2008 12:32 PM EDT
up
0 recs
Special Teams
Am I that stupid to think that if the specail teams continue to perform the way they did in 07, Tomlin should keep our offense in 4 down plays…(exceptions should be applied)..I am ot saying go for 4th and 3 on our 10 yard line..but if its after say 40 yards..let Ben go for it..I would rather see Ben throwing an interception..at least I know if he does that Hines and Heath will try to stop the CB or safetys advancing the field..
by Ward86 on Jul 3, 2008 1:06 PM EDT 0 recs
hehe
I touch upon this point in the most recent article on the main page. I agree, ALL teams should be going for it on 4th down more and more, particularly ones that are suspect on special teams coverage units.
by Blitzburgh on
Jul 3, 2008 1:19 PM EDT
up
0 recs
Special Teams, Special Teams, Special Teams
Dear Coach Tomlin,
First of all, let me say that I am a big fan of yours. I think you will be around as our head coach for many years to come, and as a loyal Steelers fan I will be behind you all the way. The underlying truth to that statement however, is that I will occasionally feel the need to write you a short letter explaining my feelings on some of the decisions with the hope that I may offer an outside opinion from an assistant (me) who has been with the organization for a long 12 years.
Please, I am begging you, DO NOT forsake special teams. Games are won and lost in a few plays. Offense, Defense, and Special Teams all contribute to those few plays. Our organizations successes have often come by way of eliminating the other teams big plays, and capitilizing on the few that we make. Please don't let special teams be our Achilles heal again this year. There are few things more heartbreaking for me than watching our team fight the good fight for 90 minutes and lose an a GOD** special teams play.
I'm excited that our offense should be much improved with the maturation of guys like Ben, Homes, the Oline, and the (newer) offensive system. I'm also stoked that our defense will be better with the healthy return of Troy, Linebackers, etc... But all this may be for naught if special teams can't get it done on the field when they are called on.
Yours truly,
VogelsoN
by vogelson on Jul 4, 2008 9:48 AM EDT 0 recs
man
I’m not sure what the deal is with that funk ass formatting glitch. Try posting that again vogelson.
by Blitzburgh on Jul 4, 2008 2:21 PM EDT 0 recs











