Could The Steelers Really Keep Six Or Seven WRs On The Squad?
It's a possibility. At least so says Micah Rucker. Or maybe that's just Rucker's wishful thinking, knowing that if only five receivers are kept, then he's probably relegated to the practice squad.
“They may keep anywhere from six to seven (receivers),” Rucker said. “I believe I’m in that six or seven. They may look at me as a developmental (squad) guy. That’s all right with me as long as I can keep working and learning.”
I agree with you Micah. You are in the top six or seven of our corps. What I'm a little less sure of is the assertion that the team might have six or seven wide receivers active during any given week. MAYBE six if Eddie Drummond just seems so absoultely invaluable as a return man that the team has to keep him on board. But that's not overly likely either, no?
Anyway, I mentioned in my latest 53-man roster prognosis that I thought Rucker probably missed his chance to secure the inside track over Dallas Baker for a roster spot. Two missed opportunities in the clutch to make plays. Tough tough plays, but plays that guys on the fringe need to make.
Not necessarily though. Despite missing a few chances and regressing a touch since the middle of the offseason, Rucker leaves no doubt in anyone's mind that he's at least willing to work hard and compete. There's no doubt he at least has the fighter's spirit and panache you want to see out of players. He seems in the moment on the field, he will mouth off a bit when lost in the heat of the battle (as evidenced by his questioning of the sideline ref's call that he bobbled the ball during a crucial play in the Steelers final drive with less than two minutes), and perhaps most importantly, he has the physical attributes that make scouts and general managers wet their pants. Ok fine, maybe they don't wet their pants, but it at least sends them into a fantasy land where 60 inch flat panel TVs are on a conitnuous loop of impressive displays of measurables sans football pads.
Granted, Rucker's measurables aren't elite across the board. He's definitely not the fastest cat out there. Not by a longshot. His 40 times prior to the draft were fairly unimpressive. But from what I can surmise based on the limited action I've seen from him, he has little trouble creating necessary space from his man. What he may lack in sheer speed, it seems he makes up in long, long strides and surprisingly decent routes for a rookie out of Eastern Illinois.
As I mentioned in my most recent 53-man roster prognostication, I thought Rucker lost any shot he had at getting an upper hand over Dallas Baker for one of the coveted final roster spots that us fans can presume is still up for grabs. He didn't bomb or anything. In fact, he played fine and I was kind of impressed by him, despite his inability to make the clutch play down the stretch. Dixon was looking his way because he got open. Unfortunately for Rucker, both his bobble on the sideline, and his inability to snag the Hail Mary as time expired, were plays that could have been made. Yes, they were tough. But, they're the types of plays that unheralded prospects need to make if they're to stick with a team like the Pittsburgh Steelers.
Anyway, this post was not meant to be an indictment of Micah Rucker. Instead, it was more geared towards the initial quote I included about the possibility of the Steelers carrying 6 of 7 WRs.
Is this wishful thinking on Rucker's part? Or is it not out of the realm of possibility that the team keeps more than 5 WRs active, knowing that Eddie Drummond is likely to contribute little in the pass receiving department? And what the hey, if you have any thoughts about Rucker, now may be the best time to air them. I, for one, am hoping he might make it. But the odds aren't looking good at the moment, and frankly, time may be running out for him and other guys on the outside looking in.
Thoughts?
0 recs |
15 comments
Comments
No Way
do the Steelers keep more than 5 WR on the final 53.
When You Run The Ball Good Things Happen
by 5020 on Aug 22, 2008 8:58 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Rucker
I am on Rucker’s band wagon. Yes, he could have really helped his cause by making those plays, but as fate would have it… I’m hoping he makes it to the PS. With Nate’s inconsistancy and contract ending, retaining Rucker would not only be good insurance, but he would keep Baker looking over his shoulder as well.
by steelersrock08 on Aug 22, 2008 9:49 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
he's 6'6'' with a 40 inch vertical.
How can you give up on someone with that kind of athleticism. Sounds like a Plaxico Burress clone…
or a Matt Trannon. : P
by iBleedBlack&Gold on Aug 22, 2008 7:27 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
His quote
When he says that he thinks he’s one of the 6 or 7 AND that they see him as a developmental guy, that tells me that he meant 6 or 7 WRs, including the practice squad. I don’t think he’s saying they’ll keep that many on 53 man roster.
by WolfpackSteelersFan on Aug 22, 2008 11:41 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
good point
I didn’t initially read it that way but it makes sense now that you point it out and frankly that makes much more sense than him thinking that the team would actually keep 7 wide outs.
by cgolden on Aug 22, 2008 12:26 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
it's unclear
whether he is including the practice squad in that figure- and those spots are tight as well. The not having played much special teams sounds like a cautionary sign, though.
by vherub on Aug 22, 2008 12:25 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
If Rucker means
that they will keep Ward, Holmes, Sweed, Nate, then Baker would probally be 5. Then just going by what Rucker said, who would be 6 and 7 (on Practice Squad I guess). They have WR Marvin Allen on the practice squad all year. I think If Baker is 5 then Drummond and Reid are cut. Unless Drummond does something amazing on Special Teams I think they will go with a starter. Number six will probally be Rucker and if they keep seven I guess it would be Bloom if the kick return by committee doesn’t work he could be activated.
by steelcitykid on Aug 22, 2008 12:26 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Wasn't the initial hype around Rucker over his "measurables"?
That is what I recall. Turns out that “4.47 40” some coach timed on his wristwatch at Rucker’s workout was a bit generous. :(
by robert ethan on Aug 22, 2008 1:41 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
good point
I knew it must have been too good to be true.
Nobody that big and athletic goes undrafted.
by iBleedBlack&Gold on Aug 22, 2008 7:29 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Dallas Baker
My Florida alum co-worker told me that Baker was cut. He saw it on a message board, so who knows. Anyone seen confirmation?
by WolfpackSteelersFan on Aug 22, 2008 2:13 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Just checked Google
no official news story.
by WolfpackSteelersFan on Aug 22, 2008 2:15 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
SteelCityInsider.com Comments?
Hey, does anyone subscribe to SteelCityInsider.com? I was interested to know what Jim Wexell had to say in his “Answer Man” column about what the Steelers are doing behind the scenes in negotiations with M. Smith, Chris K., and Bryant McFadden. I think those 3 are keepers for this team going forward. I believe Starks is gone after this year as well as Nate Washington.
I believe they will end up franchising M. Smith, resigning Chris K. and the verdict is out on what they will do with B. McFadden. I may be in the majority, I don’t think it would be bad to have a billionaire owner in place who would be able to help this franchise keep some of its good young players. If we don’t want to keep them because they haven’t shown it on the field, then that is one thing. But if it is just not having the money, then I think having someone else in charge who has deeper pockets isn’t necessarily a bad thing.
Thoughts?
by datruth4life on Aug 22, 2008 2:25 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Agreed.
i want the owner who can write the checks, and have the sense of mind to leave the decisions to Rooneys.
by iBleedBlack&Gold on Aug 22, 2008 7:30 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs

by 























