Steelers Defense Lone Bright Spot On Otherwise Dark, Dark Day
I'm tempted to avoid writing a single word about the performance of our offense today against the Philadelphia Eagles. It was so bad that there was literally not a single positive thing to mention. Alas, however, I have had a few thoughts about (surprise, surprise) Bruce Arians' play-calling that are worth mentioning. For another day though.
For now let's instead talk about all the exquisite things our defense did, both collectively and individually. Let's start with...
* LaMarr Woodley. He's got some learning to do, no doubt, but he sure did make some nice plays. His burst off the edge on his sack was very impressive, and to boot, he actually found another gear to finish off McNabb after not getting a firm grasp on him the first time around. He's going to be a special player, particularly when he acclimates himself to the rapid-fire pace of the game when he's out in space covering receivers and TEs. That said, he did do a nice job in several instances finding the right spot in the zone to flood to.
* Very respectable play by William Gay. We had some issues defending the pass in the first half, but Gay more than held his own, particularly in the second half. He's going to be just fine, I think.
* Troy Polamalu is back, in a huge way. It's somewhat comical that he was named a Pro Bowler last year, when it's crystal clear that he was nowhere full strength last year. He seems more fit and limber than ever in 2008. That interception was absolutely incredible. Even getting a hand on that deflected pass was impressive. Finding a way to cradle it with one arm after being nearly parallel to the ground when he dove? WOW. From the look of things, we're going to be relying on our defense more and more throughout the year. Forcing turnovers will be vital, and through three games, Polamalu has snagged three picks.
* Paging James Harrison. Harrison? Hellloooooo? Maybe next week against a Ravens squad he typically shows up for.
* Solid outing for Larry Foote. He may be our weakest link amongst the starting LB corps, but that's no knock. He's still earned the right to start over Lawrence Timmons. That doesn't mean we don't need Timmons on the field...LOTS...but Foote has also been deserving of ample playing time. There's enough PT for both, so it's not really an issue who's out there on the first play of the game.
* We need to lock-up Bryant McFadden sooner rather than later. He's arrived as a bona-fide cover man in this league. Here's the deal. If we don't resign him, we're stuck having to draft a CB, perhaps even in the first round. Sure, we could try to get by with William Gay and DeShea Townsend to play opposite from Ike Taylor. But it's not the wisest of moves. We all know where we need to invest our draft picks the next several years, so why not retain what we already have at CB? This is a no-brainer to me. We've tried to get by on the cheap in the trenches (both sides of the ball) and we know how far that has gotten us. Please, please, don't let us try to cut corners for financial reasons in this situation too.
* If this defense hadn't played as extraoridnarily well as it did today, particularly in the second half, this one could have been a loss for the ages. Maybe not margin of defeat wise. But let's all face it, the score was not indicative of the lopsided nature of this football game.
* Allow me to conclude by saying that at least we are moving forward confident that we have a superb defense to keep us in games when our offense sputters, like today. With no defense, you rarely have a shot to make a run in the playoffs, let alone even make the playoffs. And unless you're one of the elite Colts offenses of year's past, our the 2007 Patriots, you're going to encounter dry spells on offense. It happens, even to very good teams. But without that consistent defense, the odds of stringing together winning streaks and competing against the better teams in the league, go way down.
We've got problems, don't get me wrong. But our defense may just be special enough to overcome them, in a year when there doesn't appear to be any clear-cut favorite atop the pack of the AFC.
Discuss.
0 recs |
26 comments
Comments
I concur...
Our defense is something special for sure. In spite of how poorly our offense played today, it was still on 10-6 in the 4th quarterin large part because of the D. I agree in whole with your post.especially with about locking down Mcfadden with Townsend getting older and his ball hawking skills.
Woodley is a beast for certain that will only get better with time. Foote had a solid game and came up with some big plays but I think Timmons has a chance to be truly special. He should be on the field more often than not.
by Steeler Ric on
Sep 22, 2008 4:06 AM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
timmons
Is going to be great. No doubt. Id be curious to know how many snaps he was on the field, compared to Farrior and Foote.
by Blitzburgh on
Sep 22, 2008 4:31 AM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Thoughts
Fisrt of all great job by Jeff Reed, nailing two FGs and making a special teams tackle. He is automatic. Berger also played well as did the special teams for the most part (except for the return game).
Now someone tell me are our corners and Clark that bad at coverage or is that just the way they are taught. Bend but don’t break. I don’t like it. Now after the first quarter the defense is what kept the Steelers alive. front 3 looked solid. backers good. Secondary decent. (in the second half). Troy played outstanding.
Offense. Well I don’t know if that was called offense. Everybody on that line should be cut right now. Marvel Smith constantly missed blocks. Simmons played the worst game ever by a lineman. Hartwig was overmatched. Chris K was dissappointing. Colon should be cut. Put Starks, Essex, Stapleton, Jeff Reed, Greg Warren on the line and they will do better. Well not really the last two but……. Thats alli got to say but that was the worst game I have seen at any level for a while
by steelcitykid on
Sep 22, 2008 6:49 AM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Colon doesn't need to be cut!
Just moved to guard where he belongs! Max Starks at right tackle…IT’S SO SIMPLE!
by TheCincinnatiConqueror on
Sep 22, 2008 1:01 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
ive been a steelers fan for 15 years ive seen them lose by big margins but i cannot recall ever seeing them take a thrashing like the one they took yesterday can anyone else?
by 86_STRONGER_THAN_STEEL on
Sep 22, 2008 7:46 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Ravens in 2006?
Also, The Jags physically beat us too in ’06
by _ET_ on
Sep 22, 2008 8:09 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
yeah but not like yesterday the ravens put up some points on us in that game and bart scott clobbered ben (thats cool cause 86 got him back last year) and jax shut down our running game.but i still cant believe that ben was getting hit and sacked litterally every time he dropped back even though i saw it with my own eyes. i ’m trying to think but i just cant remember ever seeing the steelers losing like that
by 86_STRONGER_THAN_STEEL on
Sep 22, 2008 9:09 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Looking Back
The “D” – was most of somewhat impressive.
Allowing 260 overall
a bit lack luster in the Pass rushing with 3 sacks with 2 INT’s
Overall not a bad performance but not enough to win a game. At certain point when a big stop of the eagles offense was needed they didn’t get it done. The Steelers have a great deal of work to do on each side of the ball.
by Madman1978 on
Sep 22, 2008 7:31 AM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
absolutely was enough to win a game
You do realize that we we converted 2 Third Downs, turned the ball over four times, got a safety, were sacked 9 times, and STILL had a chance to march down the field for the winning score LATE in the 4th quarter? Sheesh. Defense did EVERYTHING necessary to win that game.
You make it sound like 260 yards overall is a big number. Maybe you don’t realize that 260 yards would be the 5th worst average yards per game in the league so far in 2008. The KC Chiefs average 260 yards per game. Note also that the Eagles had the VAST majority of those 260 in the first half. Yet, we found a way to limit them to just ahandful of points in the first half. This defense is amazing.
by Blitzburgh on
Sep 22, 2008 7:38 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I think what it comes down to is that if the steelers can’t win against a high-flying offense when they are held to 15, we cannot possibly win the superbowl. In the end, 15 points from the eagles is 15 points, and you have to give the defense credit where it was due. The offense had every opportunity to win this game and instead lost it for us.
Lets work on that this week guys.
by steelguy99 on
Sep 22, 2008 9:57 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
more i think about it
This was one of best performances from our defense in a long time. First half, there were issues. But, turnovers are turnovers, and we forced a big one when it counted in 1st half to keep it close.
2nd half performance was DOMINANT by our D. I’ll be rehasing it more closely for the doubters out there, but it’s important we don;t let our pissed off attitude towards the offense taint our judgment of just how incredible the D was.
by Blitzburgh on
Sep 22, 2008 10:00 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
kinda reminds me of the kordell stewart days
(without yancy thigpen) i remember always thinkin if we could just put up 21 points a game we’d be winning superbowlS
by 86_STRONGER_THAN_STEEL on
Sep 22, 2008 9:38 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
as for championships
Only one team wins, but as the adage goes, ‘defense wins championships’.
If our D can stay healthy and be this good all season, we’ll be just fine. But one injury to Ike, Polamalu, A Smith, Woodley/Harrison, and all of a sudden, we could be in trouble. BUt if we get lucky and stay in tact, we’ll be allright, just because of how good they are/will be.
by Blitzburgh on
Sep 22, 2008 10:02 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Don't forget that the D...
…was put into some bad situations through offensive ineptitude and turnovers. I was totally amazed that the score was as low as it was. Correct me if I’m wrong but didn’t the Eagles get a pretty short field on at least two of their drives that produced points.
The D did a damn fine job, and I think the offense just wasn’t given the plays to adjust to the situation.
by SCSteeler on
Sep 24, 2008 3:05 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Woodley
He made a couple of good sacks and pressures, but I also saw him just barely miss a number of tackles, requiring the safety or CB to come in and clean up after him. As the LOLB, he has the second-most “showy” position (sacks and QB pressures) right after the non-existent Harrison, so part of his numbers come just from how our defense is set up.
While our defense was good in general, the D-line wasn’t part of it. Hampton and Hoke were non-existent (I even saw the Eagles RB run right by Hoke, brushing against him, without getting touched), one of Smith’s tackles was far over on the right DE spot, and Kirschke got twice as many tackles than the rest of the D-line combined. That’s just weird.
by zacharai on
Sep 22, 2008 12:11 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Coaching and the fundamentals
This starts from the top boys. The pattern is starting to reveal itself. We had our best lineman in Faneca seemingly ignored an dismissed. We are seeing the same thing with Marvel Smith who was not signed to a contract for next year (Meaning he is gone too without an adequate replacement). All this while paying huge money for the guy on the bench. It is clear that from the very top (Tomlin and Colbert) the concept of offensive line is not understood at the most basic level. Cower showed that you win with talent in the trenches and fewer stars at the skill position. True, 9 offensive linemen were picked before it was the Steelers’ turn in the first round, but this debacle was outlined in a policy where you refuse to sign and pay Alan Faneca, but you pay Max Starks (Max Starks!) the amount of money that would have kept Faneca here. Coach Z has alluded to Faneca being a disruptive force. Consider this: Z is just trying to justify an extremely poor decision made by management that was, I’m sure, in large part made with Z’s input. And, maybe Faneca was telling the guys things contrary to what Coach Z was because Coach Z SUCKS at his job. Next, Bruce Arians. Where to start. I’ve always said: Good coaches are the ones that can make the adjustments. Arians is not a good coach. 7-8-9 in the box over and over and he can’t adjust. The Eagles had to be saying “I can’t believe this keeps working!” Of course, we knew Arians was suspect based on his body of work previously as an offensive coordinator. Now, we have to turn our eye to Tomlin. What will he do? We saw against the Eagles no good adjustments by Arians. Does Tomlin know so little about offense that he couldn’t demand or even impliment adjustments? I was waiting to see if Tomlin was the kind of coach who stood on the sidelines in times of adversity, or if he was the kind who would walk to the banch and motivate players. I’m starting to suspect that he stands calm and quiet because he doesn’t know what to do when his offense is struggleing. He seems to be one of those guys who believes he is just a head coach who only deligates. Please someone correct me. We’ve seen they can’t make adjustments during games, can the coaching staff make adjustments during the week? Can the organization make the adjustment back to the philosophy where you build your offense around your offensive line (And a really good quarterback)?
by WyoFan on
Sep 22, 2008 12:40 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Releasing Faneca
was still a good call…he wanted too much money for how old and close to washed up he is. You can’t use the mismanagement of Max Starks to harp on the release of Faneca. I still think it was the right move. Give Kemo some time to truly learn how to play the position and not just be a brute with superhuman strength
by TheCincinnatiConqueror on
Sep 22, 2008 1:07 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Coaching
Tomlin was handed Arians and LeBeau. The organization thrusted Arians on him. I don’t think he had a choice with Z either. Arians isn’t a run first coach and he needs to get it through his head that 0, 1, 2 yards is a good thing that tires offensive lineman over a course of a game. All FWP needs is a crack and the Steelers don’t care what quarter it comes in. The Steelers were only down 4 points.
Plus u save Ben from getting murdered. It doesn’t appear that he’s heard of a 5 yard out, a screen (middle, lt, rt), what about 2 tight ends and 1 running back and 2 wideouts. This makes the blitz have to go around the corner to get to Ben. The running back can help Simmons who always needs help. Dude had to be on the titanic.
by 72Steeler on
Sep 22, 2008 2:05 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Both coaches his choice
Don’t think it was listed anywhere that they forced any coach on Tomlin. He chose those men. The rooney’s give that authority to the HC unlike the redskins who hired coordinators before a HC.
by Chicago Steeler on
Sep 22, 2008 5:35 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
We will have a better line next year
Trust, with Smith, Starks, and Simmons moving on, we will have enough to pay some top quality linemen. Ben may want to think about restructuring his contract to get some protection. Because he’s looking like a $1 vs $100 mln QB
by 72Steeler on
Sep 22, 2008 2:07 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
How many more games will we lose...
like the Wild Card game last year against Jacksonville because of poor coaching? What a sickening game!!!
Our Steelers are better than that!!
Maybe the O-line is horrible, but i prefer to believe that the coaching staff/Front Office/Rooneys should have made better decisions than they did in the draft this year. They could have done something better than picking another WR, that we didn’t really need and another running back that so far look like they might not cut it in the NFL.
Tell them to “GO TO HELL, BEN”. No matter how much I like my team, I have never in all my life seen anything like this situation, have you? Don’t get yourself killed or maimed because your management decided not to protect you and give you some half-assed players and then a 100 million contract. WTF!! THey probably had to give you that large a contract so that you would even come back.
I couldn’t even go to work today! Isn’t that nuts?
by SteeladyinVA on
Sep 22, 2008 10:33 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
perspective - get some
Do I think it’s nuts that you couldn’t go to work because of a lost a football game? Uhhh, yeah!
by worldtrip on
Sep 23, 2008 3:01 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
hey
Be nice to our lady friend. Shes a great fan.
by Blitzburgh on
Sep 23, 2008 3:33 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I feel your pain...
I didn’t physically miss any work but I was checked out mentally…expecially since I found out FWP will be out for the Ravens game. I guess we will fiinally get a chance to see what Delicious Mendenhall’s all about. Should be exciting.
For what it’s worth, I like our defense against the rookie on Monday night and hopefully our O (coaches included) will bounce back like rubber to pull out the victory! I ride or die with the Black and Gold!
by Steeler Ric on
Sep 23, 2008 5:31 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs









