While We Wait Patiently For The Steelers One Last Time This Year, Some Thoughts On The Season So Far
Many of us hoped we would get this far; few actually believed that we would. I don't pretend to know who will win next week. And I'm too superstitious to say so if I did. But there are a few points we can emphasize right now regardless of the outcome of SB 43.
Mike Tomlin for Coach of the Year. The case for other coaches have weakened since the playoffs began as the case for Tomlin looks better every day. Smith is still a strong candidate because a year ago it looked like the the Falcons were on their way to Hell on an express train. It also appeared that they would be there for quite some time. These types of rags to riches stories are what people seem to prefer. Tomlin's case is more subtle but very compelling.
Most of the more sophisticated observers among The Nation and in the local and national media felt that the Steelers were a year away at best from being in their current position. The arguments were difficult to refute: insufficient talent, experience or both at several positions, but especially the offensive line. Lack of depth on the defensive line. The Steelers were heavily criticized for doing little or nothing to address these concerns through free agency and the draft. Further complicating matters was their schedule that was universally considered to be brutal. Making the playoffs at all seemed beyond this team's grasp. To do so would require a good deal of luck concerning issues such as injuries, that the schedule would be a paper tiger and that the team might gel at the right time to overcome what would be, at best low seeding in the playoffs.
Circumstances did not turn in favor of Coach Tomlin and his team. The injury bug hit hard, depriving the team of it's punter and second string QB in preseason; the two most experienced offensive linemen were lost to IR, as was its #2 running back; the 'thin' D-line would lose two of three starters at the same time for a couple of weeks, as well as both the starting and backup left cornerbacks; the #1 running back would miss about a third of the season and be only marginally effective for another third; the #1 QB would play hurt most of the season. As for the schedule. While teams like the Pats, Colts and Jags were at less than their best, the Steelers would play seven games, just short of half their schedule, against playoff teams, breaking even against them and sweeping the rest. Thus they also demonstrated a much overlooked characteristic of championship caliber teams; beating all the teams they are supposed to beat and getting their share of wins against equal and superior competition. Not only did the team survive their bad luck and inadequacies, it thrived; earning a 2 seed into the playoffs and now the favorite to be the last team standing.
Now here's the deal ( to paraphrase Dennis Green); The 2008 Steelers are who we thought they are. A team with considerable flaws but with superior coaching and great team chemistry is on the brink of a championship. All but the lunatic fringe/crazy uncle faction of Steeler Nation realizes this. Tomlin for COTY.
The coming personnel headache. Question: How do you justify firing anybody from a world champion team? Something for the gathering lynch mob seeking to dispose of BA, Coach Z and others at the end of the year. But that's just the appetizer. A world championship would also make pretty much all of our free agents more expensive on the open market. Let's, just as an example, look at the situation at wide receiver. Lots of folks seem to thing that Nate Washington is expendable and we should let him go. However, I think that last Sunday's championship game eerily illuminated our WR issues. Hines is a great player who is increasingly vulnerable to his all out style of play as he ages. He could go down at anytime. Limas Sweed remains a huge question mark (I wouldn't give up on him at this juncture, but if he drops another ball like Sunday I want to be at the head of the line to disembowel him). So, imagine a scenario where Santonio is isolated among a group of clowns at wideout. Meanwhile Nate with his slower learning curve (that's how it can be with UDFA. Remember Deebo was not made in a year) could have a Pro Bowl year somewhere else. Why is it that people think that he has peaked as a receiver? Now repeat the exercise with the O-line and the defensive secondary and you'll know why I use the term 'headache'.
And lets not forget the draft. We're drafting in the 30's folks whether we win next week or not. What that could mean is that we could be drafting Best Player Available (BPA) if no player drops down that could clearly help us maintain champion level status even if it is glaring area of need. On the other hand we could do quite well in the free agent market; think a Ryan Clark or Mewelde Moore type player who might prefer to work for a stable organization that regularly gets the opportunity to compete for championships, has a great working environment and a coach who may be flirting with greatness.
Another consideration is the economy. If you are assuming that the sports/entertainment industry is recession (depression) proof you just may be wrong. The price of tickets are or will be going down. The President just froze the salaries of his top officials. The Rooneys have been working with a depressed economy (rustbelt) for years and every indication is that things are trending in that direction for everyone else. The idea that any but a small number of players will continue to be able to demand continually escalating salaries may be an idea that has come and gone. Sorry to inject that bit of reality into the discussion, but the sports/entertainment bubble is another that is primed to burst sooner or later. The 'good' news is that this trend favors organizations that are practiced in frugal behavior. Low cost of living in the Pittsburgh area may prove beneficial as well.
Finally, who wants to wager that there will be a conversation at season's end about a contract extention for Tomlin (Sorry RE).
Regardless of how things turn out in Tampa it has been an extraordinary year. But if this group manages to prevail it will have gone a long way toward creating a legacy every bit as impressive as the teams of the 70s. And they may have the opportunity to collect just as many rings.
2 recs |
38 comments
|
Comments
I agree!!! Give Tomlin the award!!
I wrote in a previous post that Tomlin could and should be coach of the year, but probably wouldn’t, since they’d probably give it to someone who brought a team from the bottom to the top….teams like Miami and Atlanta.
I’d certainly vote for Mike if I could!!!! I think he certainly deserves it! This team has held together this year through tons of adversity! The coaches all deserve tons of respect!!!
Man…I really hope they win! Win and deal whatever offseason stuff when they get to it!
L!
by Ragnar808 on Jan 22, 2009 9:51 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
You Can!!!
Go to NFL.com and vote! You can vote as many times as you like. I’ve voted at least ten times.
by WyoFan on Jan 23, 2009 11:03 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Sorry
Tomlin’s great, but Mike Smith coaches a bunch of clowns and went 11-5: 2 games better than our SB competition in a tougher division. Tomlin might be better than Smith, but you don’t get to show your full coaching faculties when your guys like each other and your team has only one serious weakness. When you have to coach a bunch of nobodies most of whom are new to the team, you need to use all the coaching ability you have. Curse of the good team.
One thing boding well for us…our prospective free agents have not been having big postseasons. BMac and Nate have done their jobs when necessary but have not been spectacular. If these guys were making plays in the playoffs their price tags would really increase.
by CarlWeathersMustache on Jan 22, 2009 10:21 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
NFC South
We saw that the Bucs were frauds, Carolina was good, but obviously stumbled. New Orleans was terrible on the road. Yeah sure none of those teams were the Bengals and Browns, but the elevation of the NFC South to very good status was a bit overblown and premature. Your point on Smith still stands I suppose but I think we had plenty of evidence that it’s not THAT unlikely and amazing to turn around a team from one year to the next and for teams to fall from grace quickly on the flipside. Baltimore, Miami, Atlanta, Carolina all had huge leaps forward; Cleveland, Jacksonville, Seattle, Green Bay the other way.
by Blitzburgh on Jan 22, 2009 10:25 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I agree
I learned from experience that it is equally as difficult to turn a team around as it is to take over a team that has had success in the past and attain the same success if not make the team better. The REAL diiference between the two is personnel. You notice these teams have these great turn arounds for various reasons but there are two that are constant.
1. There is a change of key personnel. The right mix of new talent and fresh perspective.
2. An embrace and belief of a new philosophy because you are tired of losing and willing to believe in something new if it’s going to get you wins.
To take a team that has had success and try to sustain it. It’s not often it works. Usually the new coach has a good year and things decline. Sometimes it’s because previous success came easier because the old phylosophy was familiar so when it doesn’t come out the way they like, the players lose focus.
For this reason these great turn around teams’ coaches should not get Coach of the year consideration until they can repeat their success. That’s why Tomlin deserves it. He not only repeated the success of his first year he made the team better. In my opinion there’s only two in the running Whiz and Tomlin. I give the edge to Tomlin because he took his team through numerous injuries, one of the toughest schedules this year, and kept them focues to better his record and standing from last year.
I’m wondering if the Cardinals are going to be around for the years to come, like the emerging Niners of the 80’s or are they the Falcons who lost to the Broncos, or Seahawks who lost to the Steelers.
"The team that scores the most points wins."
John Madden
(Master of the obvious)
by PixburghArn on Jan 23, 2009 8:31 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
So much depends on QB
They’re in a sticky situation at QB. Warner’s going to decline and it’ll probably happen quickly. Although playing in the south will extenuate him some (see brett favre struggling in snow).
by Chicago Steeler on Jan 23, 2009 10:31 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
You know old people hate the cold
LOL That’s why Florida is full of them.
"The team that scores the most points wins."
John Madden
(Master of the obvious)
by PixburghArn on Jan 23, 2009 10:58 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Those seahawks were good, (not great) for a few years prior to their superbowl run and won the division 2 straight years after they made the superbowl. 4 straight years in a row winning the division and 5 straight years in the playoffs isn’t exactly a fluke.
I'll drink your Milkshake, I'll drink it up!
by drinkyourmilkshake on Jan 26, 2009 11:21 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
You get half credit
They won a VERY weak division
"The team that scores the most points wins."
John Madden
(Master of the obvious)
by PixburghArn on Jan 26, 2009 11:39 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Not so
This team was in worse shape than any team in the NFL, even Detroit or Miami. Their franchise QB was sitting in a federal prison, the city was racially divided over the team and dog fighting scandal, their coach walked out on them after 8 games to coach the Razorbacks (not exactly a glamor job), and what passed for star players were complaining publicly about wanting out of the hellhole that was the Falcons.
Plus you call TB and NO frauds and terrible? By that logic the Steelers aren’t that good because they won a division with two cellar dwellers, Cleveland and Cincy. Even NO might be able to beat those guys on the road. None of those teams you list had the pervasive personnel problems from top to bottom that the Falcons had. Not even close.
by CarlWeathersMustache on Jan 23, 2009 9:37 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
That may be true.....
But one thing that watching the news and seeing these things unfold don’t show you is what these contaversies do internally. Sometimes hard pressure from adverse situations can make things look worse than they seem. Trying to keep a boat from sinking WHILE there is a leak is futile. When that leak is fixed it becomes a possible task. The tools you have will decide how much effort it takes to rid the boat of water. If you throw out all the spoons you have been trying to spoon the water out with and get some buckets it makes it easier. Atlanta gutted their organization and cut/released some big names. They added some key vets as well. With the controversy behind them, fresh new direction to get out of the rut, the hole was fixed. Players that were distracted now became focused and started to produce. The pieces have been there, just that they needed a new start. They also had a last place schedule. I want to see what they do next year before I give too much props bro.
"The team that scores the most points wins."
John Madden
(Master of the obvious)
by PixburghArn on Jan 23, 2009 9:59 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
The Offensive Line...
for instance, as mentioned above, tells how good Tomlin is. Willie Colon was the only starter from last year after The Steelers lost Marvel and what’s-his-name (Totaly blanked). I’m a big bleiever that a team builds from the line out and that means The Steelers built a sky scraper (refering to getting to the SB) on a wood foundation. That is some serious coaching engineering by Tomlin. Could Smith have won if Ryan had gone down? I don’t think so. Tomlin had to re-engineer almost every week throughout the season. He was very successful at not letting the ups and downs affect the performance of the team.
Smith won with a great running back. Tomlin won without one. Smith won giving his quarterback good protection. Tomlin won without giving his quarterback protection. Smith won with a weak schedule. Tomlin won with the toughest. None of the teams in Smith’s division made it past the first round of the playoffs. One of the teams in Tomlins division made it to the AFC Championship. Need I go on?
Now, let’s look at the playoffs. All the other candidates are gone, except Whiz, because they didn’t do what Tomlin did: Make their team even better in the playoffs. That can’t be denied. I was shocked to see how well the offensive line played! They are still not great, but their improvement speaks of a coach who took every oppurtunity to improve his teams chances.
Tomlin gets every drop of performance out of his team including guys that I groaned about when I heard they were replacing some of The Steelers biggest talent. This seems to come from an atmosphere of “Team” that he has instilled and that he has been very successful at selling to his players, making the team a complete package from top to bottom. We all fear Hines not playing, but I’m starting not to. I, according to the history of this season, believe Tomlin will get Hines’ replacement ready to play. That is a COTY performance.
While I wasn’t for Tomlin as COTY so much a few weeks ago, I have to take his playoff performance into consideration. Tomlin for COTY.
by WyoFan on Jan 23, 2009 12:33 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
The coaching staff question will be interesting
It would be awfully tough to let BA go after a Super Bowl appearance, but a lesser coach like Zeirlein could be cut loose….Or, does being this successful merit no changes? Tomlin talks about bottom line alot…Great food for thought VA…
Thoughtful discussion with a sense of history
by maryrose on Jan 22, 2009 10:31 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
I disagree
I like the sentiment, but either Whiz or Smith or even Harbaugh has to be coach of the year. They did so much with so little. The Steelers have lots of little problems, but aren’t the train wrecks that Arizona, Atlanta and Baltimore have been recently.
Regarding a personnel headache – I don’t see it. I think that we are in a much better position, personnel-wise, than most teams. Our biggest free agents of the off season are Marvel Smith, Willie Colon, and Nate Washington. All of them, and all of our other free agents, are replaceable, or at the end of the careers (smith can’t have many years left). Look at Baltimore, or Dallas, or … – most other teams are worse off than us.
Regarding coaching personnel, I think that if BA has gotten us this far, then he deserves another shot. Zirlein on the other hand…
by PaulMorel on Jan 22, 2009 10:42 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Coaches
I think Smith will get it with Tomlin, Sparano and Whiz following. Harbaugh did a good job but they had defense only.
Falcons were a total mess but they have regained competitiveness, fan support and national acceptance as an organization that did the right thing if perhaps late.
Smith had the least to work with followed by Sparano.
Tomlin may win if they win the SB big, probably not if they don’t. Sparano gets close but the spanking at the end doesn’t help. Whiz is deserving for sure but is only winning it if he upsets the Steelers impressively.
"Franz" in NoCal
by franz on Jan 22, 2009 11:21 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Smith already won it
Sparano was second and I don’t think the other guys got many, if any votes. The award was given out weeks ago. But you’re right about the Falcons: sports personalities in Atllanta were bracing the public for years of non competitiveness after the organizational meltdown of last season which is what separates this turnaround from ones such as Miami, where the play was awful, not the organization.
by CarlWeathersMustache on Jan 23, 2009 9:43 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
That was AP Coach of the Year
There is also a Coach of the Year award that you can vote on at NFL.com.
by WolfpackSteelersFan on Jan 23, 2009 11:55 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
There is also
The Sporting News COY and Pro Football Weekly COY and few others, but the AP COY is generally considered the most prestigious.
by Jonny B. on Jan 23, 2009 12:03 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I would assume that it’s the oldest.
by WolfpackSteelersFan on Jan 23, 2009 3:06 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Actually, no.
According to Wikipedia (for whatever that’s worth):
“The National Football League Coach of the Year Award is presented annually by various news and sports organizations to the NFL head coach who has done the most outstanding job of working with the talent he has at his disposal. Currently, the most widely recognized award is presented by the Associated Press (AP). First presented in 1957, the AP award did not include American Football League teams. The Sporting News has given a pro football Coach of the Year award since 1947 and in 1949 gave its award to a non-NFL coach, Paul Brown of the AAFC’s Cleveland Browns. In many years (1954, 1957-1960, 1962), TSN did not give an award; the awards it gave in the 1960s were to NFL coaches only, and since the AFL-NFL merger in 1970, it has called the award the "NFL Coach of the Year.” Other NFL Coach of the Year awards are presented by Pro Football Weekly-Pro Football Writers of America and the Maxwell Football Club."
by Jonny B. on Jan 24, 2009 1:51 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
In reality
it’s probably more due to Dimitroff than Smith, but still damn impressive.
by CarlWeathersMustache on Jan 23, 2009 9:44 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
out of town
a few months ago i agreed to go on a trip to honduras in late january to do some construction work on a volunteer basis for an orphanage/school down there. after i agreed to go i realized that i might be missing some steeler playoff football. thanks be to God Almighty, but it worked out that i’m not missing anything, as i leave tomorrow (saturday) and get back next saturday, the day before the game. i am very thankful for this. however, a part of me is bummed that i will not be here with you guys building in anticipation until the big game. i don’t know if i’ll have internet access or not, but if i don’t get to check in again until next sunday, keep up the good work and know that i’ll be rocking the terrible towel in honduras. go steelers!
...die trying
http://www.agentorangerecords.blogspot.com
by agentorange on Jan 23, 2009 11:39 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
Where are you going in honduras? I was able to find internet access in most small towns there, but if you’re going to be in a village you won’t have any luck.
by steelguy99 on Jan 23, 2009 12:14 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
stay classy Orange
Be safe and come back cheerin’.
by Chicago Steeler on Jan 23, 2009 12:15 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Godspeed and return safely, my Steeler friend.
by Jonny B. on Jan 23, 2009 12:18 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Steelers in Honduras
Hey Orange, let me know if your trip includes a visit to Honduras’ Bay Islands (Islas de la Bahia), where I now live (island of Utila). You should have internet access just about anywhere in Honduras but I know your group will be busy if you’re down here for just a week. If you can make it, the first cold cerveza is on me.
by steeler.lifer on Jan 23, 2009 12:28 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
thanks, all
i’m going to be just outside tegucigalpa i think. the issue isn’t whether or not i can find internet access, its about whether or not i’ll have enough free time to get away from the group and do my own ‘steelers’ thing. but i will make every effort! unfortunately, steeler.llfer, i’ll be in the south part of the country all week, although a cerveza sounds really good! thanks for the offer!
...die trying
http://www.agentorangerecords.blogspot.com
by agentorange on Jan 23, 2009 2:50 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Ugh, tegucigalpa, the further outside the better…
If you miss your flight on the way back though you should be able to catch the game at least!
Good luck and god bless.
by steelguy99 on Jan 23, 2009 2:55 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
yeah
probably not the nicest area. that’s why we’re headed there to offer a helping hand. because a helping hand is most certainly needed.
...die trying
http://www.agentorangerecords.blogspot.com
by agentorange on Jan 23, 2009 3:18 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
And a lot of prayers – which you are perfectly suited for.
by steelguy99 on Jan 23, 2009 3:30 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
just an update
to let you know (like you care) that i’m in honduras and have access so, when i have time (which isn’t often) i’m checking in to BTSC and seeing what’s going on. God bless technology!
...die trying
http://www.agentorangerecords.blogspot.com
by agentorange on Jan 25, 2009 9:03 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
thanks for being there!
I appreciate you doing what you’re doing.
by acrollet on Jan 25, 2009 10:40 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
"And they may have the opportunity to collect just as many rings."
Rick, as always really enjoyed your observations and analysis of this amazing season. I wholeheartedly agree with your closing line, for three main reasons: 1. Mike Tomlin is still in the formative stages of what will be a long career here, and will continue putting his unique stamp on the team’s identity; 2. Ben is just entering the same stage of his career that Bradshaw was when he won his first SB; and 3. The defense has the coaching, youth and depth at key positions to stay strong for the foreseeable future. The only major problems (talent on the O-line, a couple good prospects on the D-line) can be fixed without losing a step. The O-line cant help but be a little better next year, and the D-line starters still have enough gas in the tank to allow a gradual transition over the next 2-4 years.
This team is still a long way from perfect and that is the message Tomlin has spelled out every week during his tenure. I love a line of his from a Pittsburgh P-G story earlier this week: “It’s never been our goal to get to the Super Bowl.” At first glance, you’d think it was a misquote because, after all, isn’t it every team’s goal to get to the Super Bowl? But it’s not a misquote. It’s Mike Tomlin and his continuing sermon about how you live and work each day that is important. Do the right things every day, the reward will be there at the end. This is where the break before the Super Bowl works in Pittsburgh’s favor, because every day of preparation only adds to their physical superiority on the field.
by steeler.lifer on Jan 23, 2009 12:20 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Just needed to say that it’s good to have your perspective back on board lifer.
by Chicago Steeler on Jan 23, 2009 2:53 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Offseason dealings
You bring up some really good points. I think team prestige does matter to people right up there with money. The latter usually winning.
I would like to think if its me, I’d take 2 million from a team that wins super bowls than take 6 million from the Lions. But hey 4 million is a lot of money right?
As far as the draft. I have no doubt in my mind they will get us good players at positions we NEED
Last years draft was for depth, this year is out of necessity. They will trade up if need be to get who they want where they want him.
And remember great players slide every year down that draft.
by Mechem on Jan 24, 2009 4:29 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
Rick Va.
you’ve done it again. A great piece. I agree on all accounts. I’ve mention contract extention on a previous blog here. Tomlin is clearly COTY just because he has the right stuff. And I think a lot of his peer in the NFL are just as dumbfounded as the fans.
The front office bettter wise up and keep this guy. Like I said before he’s the real deal.
Hey VA, keep pumping out real conversation pieces.
Go Steelers!
by C-Mac on Jan 25, 2009 11:53 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
The front office needs to wise up?
Now that is funny.
by worldtrip on Jan 26, 2009 2:06 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs

by 


















