Behind the Steel Curtain: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
Around SBN: Fedor vs Rogers Results and Live Coverage

The myth of Blitzburgh

Is it me or do the football analyst on TV don't really watch football,  except for Mike Golic. Everyone is saying that the Steelers are a blitzing team and Warner will burn them just the way he burned Philly. The reality is, and only Golic seems to grasp this, is that the Steelers don't really blitz, they get pressure usually with only 4 sometimes 5 guys rushing through scheme or through mismatches that favor our rushers. That is why our pass defense has been so good, we have more people covering and STILL get pressure on the QB. Philly went all out and blitzed Warner with 5-6 guys and he burned them with the hot read passes. Technically, those hot reads won't be there for Warner against the Zone Blitz because we have people dropping back into the throwing lanes. This favors the Steelers and no-one in the media seems to grasps the concept of the Zone Blitz.

0 recs  |  Comment 27 comments

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

We really should make a press docket for people who are going to bother to talk about the steelers. The problem is that 90% of the people talking about the steelers haven’t watched a game all season.

by steelguy99 on Jan 27, 2009 9:55 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

What are you talking about?

The Steelers’ storied franchise uses a smashmouth running game to wear down the other team, take the air out of the football, and control the time of possession, while their defense blitzes from all angles to get free shots at the QB. In fact, Troy Polamalu is one of the best blitzing safeties in the business.

Come on, everybody knows that.

charity standing orders

by BadMaafala on Jan 27, 2009 10:31 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

It's true

We run run run pass. We cover, man, then BLITZ BLITZ BLITZ. And when we send “everyone” on these blitzes Kurt Warner will pick them up and hit a long bomb to Fitz cause Ike just got burned on the route and since he can’t intercept we will have no chance. Damnit. This game is already over :( Thanks media for making it so clear to me.

by Hochuli loves Broccoli on Jan 27, 2009 4:11 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

It's really not about how many you can send

It’s all about where they are coming from. The Steelers excel at disguising who is coming on a blitz, and who is dropping into coverage. That is the basis of the zone blitz. To not leave yourself vulnerable to the hot routes while still being able to get to the quarterback from unpredictable locations.

by OHSteelerfan on Jan 27, 2009 12:52 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

Does anyone have a guess

As to what percentage of plays both Woodley and Harrison rush? How often do we bring both those guys and another? I’m just looking for a rough guess as to how often we bring 3,4,5,6??? Anyone care to ballpark it?

Thoughtful discussion with a sense of history

by maryrose on Jan 27, 2009 2:23 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

I’d be interested to know the answer. I’d venture a guess for all of them but I’m afraid I’d be really wrong. I can “guess” pretty confidently that we don’t send 6 more than a time or two a game, and if we do it means we have them on the ropes.

by steelguy99 on Jan 27, 2009 4:22 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

i cried for short passes all year against you but realized the safety’s and at least 1 LB were johnny on the spot. the ravens had 3 games to study for you and still could’t get many short passes dumped off. mason, who is one of the best 3r down receivers, never got going in any of those games with a short game. arizona is not going to get it right the first time. not a chance.

by raven on Jan 27, 2009 3:20 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

And

you’ve heard it here exclusively on BTSC.

by Hochuli loves Broccoli on Jan 27, 2009 4:13 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Maybe

They consider it a blitz if a non lineman rushes the QB? I don’t mean to defend anyone, but I can’t believe that Mike Golic is the only one who has done his research. He is not an overly studious analyst.

by CarlWeathersMustache on Jan 27, 2009 6:47 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

Most "Sportswriters"

are “writers” first, with very little actual “sports” knowledge, outside of names and statistics. Strategy, gameplanning, and the technical aspects generally elude them which is why they spend so much time drumming up hullabulloo about rumors, “human interest” and controversey.

Golic, OTH, was a player and relatively cerebral. He actually understands the game and what teams are doing. Most sportwriters only know some jargon and generalities about schemes.

Personally, i don’t understand all that much about scheming, and i played 15 years of football.

by tobiathan on Jan 27, 2009 6:53 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Please clarify

I’m second-guessing my football knowledge now after reading this. Is a blitz defined as sending more pass-rushers than the defense is expecting? (Or in other words, a non-lineman rushing the QB).

OR is a blitz defined as sending more pass-rushers than the offensive blocking scheme is mathematically prepared to handle? (For example, rushing 6 against a 5-man line).

Thanks for making me think!

by DC Black&Gold on Jan 27, 2009 8:45 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I would think

That a blitz is when more than just the d-lineman rush the passer. Just my opinion tho

by OHSteelerfan on Jan 27, 2009 9:11 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

That would be silly, 3-4 defenses would then be considered to be “blitzing” almost every down.

by steelguy99 on Jan 28, 2009 9:00 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

sending 4 pass rushers in a 34 scheme should not be considered a blitz. That doesn’t make much sense.

Brandona

by PrimantisStillersNAt on Jan 27, 2009 10:35 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

Right on

Yeah some sportscasters dont quite grasp this. The only time I think you could really say it is if one of the rushers is a DB.

by Mechem on Jan 28, 2009 12:29 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Blitz vs Dog vs Stunt

The term blitz is a little tricky to define catagorically but here goes….

A blitz or Dog or Red Dog are terms referring to rushing more than the usual complement of men – meaning those men who have no pass coverage responsibilities. I have seen defensive playbooks which discern between a blitz and a dog. One term or the other is used for 1 or more added rushers. It doesn’t really matter the terminology – the concept is that you are taking any number of added rushers and exposing yourself to a big play as you increase that number.

As the offense technically has 6 eligible receivers, the defense has to defend 5 of them with the 6th being the one throwing the forward pass. 5 men may not catch a pass – usually the 5 OL players we usually think of. I won’t bother explaining the “Tackle Eligible” rule since it still only yields 5 total eligible receivers. The defense needs to defend 5 guys – how they do that depends on whether they play man, man free or some type of zone. The ‘standard’ defense for many years has been the 4-3-4… 4 DL, 3 LB, 4 DB. Assuming those 4 DL rush the QB, one LB can also rush and still provide relatively good and secure pass coverage without giving up a big play/long TD pass.

Man or cover 0 puts 5 D on 5 O in man coverage with 6 rushers. Man free or cover 1 puts 5 D on 5 O with a true free safety who plays “centerfield” and 5 rushers.

Zone coverage is a combination of short and deep zones with 4, 5 or 6 rushers. The most common concept when rushing 5 men is 3 short zone and 3 deep zone pass defenders remaining. A more recent trend has been 4 under with 2 deep and 5 rushers. This is known as Fire Zone coverage – more than 4 rushers, zone coverage but no DL dropping off the LOS into those zones.

Historically, teams always played man coverage – thus they could rush 5 or 6. Teams didn’t use zone until the 1960’s or 70’s in the NFL for the most part. The Steelers of the 70’s used a 2 deep 5 under zone with their great 4 D linemen rushing the QB. Tony Dungy later modified this into what is now known as the Tampa 2 – a 4-3 structure where the two safeties are deep, 2 corners are in the short outside zone (flat), OLB’s are in the inner short zone (curl) and the MLB drops deeper than the OLBs but not as deep as the safeties. He helps keep the TE or a slot receiver from ‘splitting’ the two deep safeties until very late in the play. This helps the D line get to the QB since this area is very hard to throw to, he has to hold the ball longer to get an open receiver.

The 3-4 defense allows for many possible rushers in addition to the 3 DLs. In this defense, you can send two LBs and still have 6 men in coverage – either man or zone. The infamous Zone Blitz adds the complexity and confusion of 3 rushers coming from the LB or DB levels with one or more DL players dropping into a short zone. This really screws up a lot of QBs, especially young ones. The Steelers play both Fire Zone, Zone Blitz and traditional man blitz schemes on any given play. This all adds up to a myriad of possibilities which are disguised until the snap or just after. I won’t bother with the “Exotic” defenses of late – first shown by Belichek in the NFL where you only have 2 or 1 DL player and a gang of LBs and DBs mobbing the line of scrimmage (LOS) with any number dropping off or rushing from many angles.

The Steelers schemes now are generally less complex and varied than some previous years/eras. Remember the Rod Woodson/Carnell Lake era when the corners and safeties were coming from all angles throughout the game? The Steelers have settled more into using less DB blitzes and rely more often on Harrison and Woodley rushing either alone or more recently both of them combined with 2 DL players. This is their version of a 4 man pass rush with others in man/zone combination coverage.

A stunt is when two or more rushers alter their typically straight ahead rush and crisscross with another rusher. They trade rush lanes or ‘gaps’ as they rush. this can be combined with a blitz – creating even more confusion. Some guys call a blitz plus a stunt a “Dog”. “Dogs” were and are color-coded thus the “Red Dog”.

Sorry if I bored some of you – old D Coordinator here…. Coach ‘Franz’

"Franz" in NoCal

by franz on Jan 28, 2009 2:51 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

Awesome.

Thanks for the schooling. Good info.

"Whaddya' mean all the beer is gone..?

by OhioYinzer on Jan 28, 2009 6:57 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Wow

I knew there was more to it than simply “one blitz per four downs” in backyard football.

Thanks for taking the time to do this!

by DC Black&Gold on Jan 28, 2009 8:00 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

this was great

more please :) Especially during the offseason, if you have time to burn, it would be awesome to get some more football knowledge… I’m also curious to hear your take on the A-11…

by acrollet on Jan 28, 2009 6:38 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

A 11 offense

I guess I am intrigued to a degree but also do not think it will go far into college or pro.
WARNING: Huge treatise follows….

The concept is to utilize an ‘exemption’ if you will in the rule book. This allows the offensive team to put players with eligible numbers (1-49 and 80-99) into positions normally requiring O linemen numbers. The offense lines up in a very flat and wide formation kind of like a spread punt and then has 5 eliigible receivers go down field with those remaining blocking or faking in the backfield.

The idea is to confuse the defense as to who is going out for a pass since they all have eligible numbers, plus they either line up quick and snap the ball or shift around just before the snap. The thing I teach my kids first and foremost in pass coverage is the basic rule of football regarding who can catch a forward pass. Most people don’t really understand this thoroughly and it leads to common misconceptions. If you keep it simple, it’s easy to understand:

1) 7 men must align on the LOS
2) Of those on the line, those at the end are eligible thus ‘tight’ ends and ‘split’ ends.
3) Backs are eligible. Backs must be at least one yard behind the LOS. There is no limitation on their breadth of alignment. So, depending on where they align you get terms such as halfback, fullback, quarterback, blocking back, wingback, flanker etc… These positions all reside behind the LOS.
4) Given 11 players is the maximum on the field at any one time, you have a maximum of 4 backs and two ends, yielding 6 eligible receivers and 5 ineligible by rule – the Linemen. Since they can not catch a forward pass and are also restricted from receiving a direct handoff – this led to the selection of certain body types and abilities which we see maximized today.

The NFL has tighter restrictions regarding alignments and jersey numbers. For example – in the NFL the offense must have 7 on the line but not more. In HS that is not the case – there is no limit. In NCAA I’m not sure to be honest as of today. They are often closer to HS rules but have adapted many rules that lie between NFL and HS. They NFL has retained the old ’Tackle Eligible" rule, but that player is technically an End – making him eligible by position but not number. If he reports to the referee as aligning in an end position, the ref informs the defense and he then becomes eligible.

The A11 may work in college, depending on their definition of the ‘scrimmage kick formation’ now and into the future. Some argue that this offense is a threat to the game and rules should be placed to limit or ban this style of play. I think that’s a bad idea. I have had some ideas along this line of thinking and have drawn up some formations and plays which would look vastly different to what we normally see. In the end though, the defense still has to defend the same basic scenarios. I think the extremely wide splits between players often seen in an A11 formation would be hard to defend at the higher levels. If you rush the QB fast enough, it limits the downfield distance a pass can be thrown – thereby changing the area the defense needs to cover before a sack occurs. But again, if the defense is astute, they aren’t going to be outflanked often.

One area where this can change the game radically would be using 11 athletes and no real linemen type players and then run the ball the majority of the time. Using rugby-style tactics could alter how a football offense attacks the defense. Believe me, I’ve thought about it. I played a little club rugby but also watched lots of it in Australia over the last 20 years – I have family/friends there so am pretty familiar with it’s tactics.

The only problem with that idea is that the defense in football is not restricted from playing behind the ball once snapped. In rugby, the defense must stay ‘onside’ by remaining on their side of the ball unless they are making a tackle on the ball carrier. Also, in rugby you can kick the ball forward and recover it yourself – even if it hits the ground. This would be akin to throwing a pass in football and being able to recover it if it hits the ground. Because this can’t happen, the defense in football doesn’t have to guard against such scenarios. It gives the defense the opportunity to align their men right next to the offense once the ball is snapped. Since you have to catch a forward pass without it hitting the ground – it’s a lot touger to ‘pooch’ the ball over an opposing defense and retain possession.

There’s lots of old sayings in football, one of which is – There’s nothing new under the sun. Well, the A11 is different but almost everything has been tried. It’s a constant cycle of experimentation, innovation and adjustments between O and D. Trends come and go but the basics stay the same – blocking and tackling are still the primary skills. Blocking is arguably the most important skill in football – it’s what sets football apart from all other spors. It’s not legal in any other sport ie: physically obstructing your opponent no matter which position you may play.

"Franz" in NoCal

by franz on Jan 29, 2009 1:20 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Glad you enjoyed the info

I wondered if people would read it or just think I was a blow-hard and skip over it.

Football is a great game for many reasons. This may help illuminate why some great athletic college players don’t make it in the pros – they can’t digest the info or don’t have the discipline to keep learning and applying the knowledge. HS ball is complicated for a fan to understand, college more so and pro demands much more devotion to study and film than college – it is a job not a sport per say.

Will give more on other topics if people like it. I’m sure there are a few other coaches on this site, at least occassionally.

I predict LeBeau will play coverage early and we will see heavy blitz off and on depending on field position and time in the half. I think he will make Arizona earn it on long drives which is less their fancy and tendency. They can’t allow the Cards to jump out to an early lead by giving up huge plays. Either that or they will bring the house from the start and force them to pick it up. If Warner can get rid of the ball quickly and hit big plays – the Steelers will be in for a long day. I can’t see that happening consistently – the coaches know they have to keep the Cards frustrated, shorten the game and their possession opportunities.

"Franz" in NoCal

by franz on Jan 28, 2009 2:30 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

Early on

I believe early on you have to kinda test all your options. The FL’s push is going to determine a lot. If the front 3 can take up 4-5 lineman, then the 4th man on the rush can really have success. Adding a 5th can only do wonders. However they just cant rush 6 or 7 at Warner and expect to get him down. Thats probably best reserved for a 3rd and long where the WR’s need time to get downfield

I also think that we can allow them to have some short passes. We do good at defending YAC and I believe we can beat up their WR’s after lots of short passes. They aren’t going to be able to take the blows our safeties deal out all day.

And the deep ball I dont see being a problem because I truly dont believe Warner gets enough time to air it out.

They will use the short game but It wont be successful for long

by Mechem on Jan 28, 2009 3:50 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Question for you Franz

I’m curious about blocking assignments. If you’ve got some extra time and wanted to write up how an o-line decifers who to block I’d be interested. I know they always point out the Mike and have heard that the Mike is accounted for by the line, but the other linebackers are the responsibility of the back or tight end or something.

I always see the crowding of the line that the Steelers do on 3rd down and wonder how the line communicates who will be responsible for who.

by Chicago Steeler on Jan 28, 2009 6:15 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

O Line Blocking

Oh boy, that’s a tough question to answer succintly. I went wild about the A11 above, so I’ll try to make this logical and somewhat brief….

The 5 OL are trying to account for 5 defenders. Since the shortest route to the ball/QB is up the middle – that is what gets accounted for first in almost all cases. Since the MLB (Mike in football talk) is aligned near the ball, he gets counted by the center who usually assigns himself or a guard to block him. Since their are often 4 D linemen, they plus the Mike make up 5 guys which the O Line can block.

After that it gets tricky to explain because of the many offensive and defensive alignments which can occur. If their are 2 RBs, then the offense can theoretically block 7 rushing defenders – not accounting for physical mismatches. The West Coast offense successfully attacked the weaknesses of pass coverage by putting the FB into the pass game where he could get open against lesser athletes. With the linebackers forced to cover 1 or 2 backs on each play, there was less help for the corners and safeties. This was followed by the 3-4 defense giving better athletes in coverage and eventually the zone blitz where pressure came unexpectedly but did not expose the defense to uncoverable men or areas.

Often, the O line will ‘slide protect’, meaning all 5 OL defend one side of their body with the back or backs blocking opposite. I use this in my 6 man protection scheme often (5 OL plus a back). Since the OL usually accounts for the 4 DL and the Mike, the FB blocks one OLB if he comes and the TE blocks the other – unless he is going out for a pass. In this case the HB blocks it or nobody does and they throw ‘hot’ vs a blitz – more on that later….

"Franz" in NoCal

by franz on Jan 29, 2009 1:49 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

This is awesome

Keep it coming, Coach. I love learning every little tiny detail about the game that I obsess over 24/7.

3 more days, people!!!!

by DC Black&Gold on Jan 29, 2009 2:06 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

All true...

I have noticed that as the games wind down, our defense of the short pass seems to get even better. Perhaps this is due to the depth of the drops that the LBs are taking or the coverages called. Either way, some short passes are not going to kill us.

Arizona is a good screen team but the Steelers will be conscious of it and will have some ‘spy’ assignments to combat them.

We on the other hand are not a good screen team in my humble opinion. The timing is bad and we always seem to throw the screen into a defender who has already beaten the linemen to the point of attack. I hope they work on it and use a screen that’s not on film yet.

"Franz" in NoCal

by franz on Jan 28, 2009 4:30 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to BTSC, a blog dedicated to the SIX-time world champion Steelers.

"Thoughtful discussion with a sense of history."

Art Rooney Jr.

"Level-headed thinking." Pittsburgh Post-Gazette

Start posting about the Steelers »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

09_mc501_hemlet_105270_small
HSS Quarterly Draft Report #2: Late edition
Small
At The Half: The Steelers On The Back Stretch
Miketomlin-200_small
Familiar feel? & a look ahead
Steelers_small
Keystone Zebras Want You
Vaca_mexico_068_small
Ryan Clark, Denver, and Sickle Cell Disease

Recent FanPosts

Small
Law don't go around here Law Dog
Dsc00111edit_small
Ah, familiarity.
Dr
Knowing when to pull the trigger
Jester_small
Yinz Luv... Jim Shearer
Sidney_steelers_small
Look for Woodley to Emerge
Small
Biggest Concerns - Denver Broncos
Yeswecan_160_small
See "The Chief"
Small
Hurry up offense
Sidney_steelers_small
Bengals - Turning point for a franchise
Small
Denver game: Rookie-palooza

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Latest NFL Headlines from SB Nation

Blogging The Boys
Pickin' & Grinnin' Week Nine
Mile High Report
Scouting Terrence Cody
Battle Red Blog
Ryan Moats Will Start Against The Colts

SPONSORS


Site Founder & Editor

Mbean_small Blitzburgh

Steelers Historian

Steeler_small maryrose

Bringing You Your Daily Six Pack

Plainview_small drinkyourmilkshake