Steelers Offense vs Cards Defense
In some ways, this game reminds me of the San Diego game. The best defense going up against one of the top offenses. Our offense vs. a middle of the pack defense that has played well over the past few games. Personally, I'd be surprised if we completely shut down the Cards offense. I'd be even more surprised if they passed up and down the field on us like they did for a half against Philly. There's a good chance they'll stalemate at about 14-24 points and the game will largely be decided by the other matchup: our offense against their defense.
I did a little research on how our offense performed against different opponents before the SD game, and here's what I wrote:
I looked at our opponents’ yards and points against and compared them to the yards and points we scored over the course of the regular season. Here’s what I found:
Opposing teams averaged 20.0 points and 310 yards (division weighted x2) against them. If anyone cares, that’d be the 11th yardage and 10th scoring defense.
We averaged 21.7 points and 312 yards, giving us on average +1.7 (7.9 percent) points and +1.5 (0.5 percent) yards versus the other teams they played. This suggests that our offense is almost exactly average at moving the ball, and I’ll hypothesize that our defense accounts for a lot of the point value over average. I find it odd that our FO offensive DVOA is an identical number (1.7) I hope that’s not their “proprietary formula”.
Now let’s split how we performed against top 10 defenses and everyone else. We played 7 games against top 10 defenses, averaging 16.1 points and 259 yards. The top 10 defenses averaged 17.6 points and 281 for the year. So on average, we were -1.4 (-8.8 percent) points and -21.7 yards (-8.4 percent) from our opponents’ opponents’ offenses. We were above average in 2 of 7 games in both points and yards.On the flip side, we were +4.2 (16 percent) points and +19.6 (5.6 percent) yards against non-top 10 defenses. We were above average in 7 of 9 games in both points and yards.
This suggests the following:
1) On average, our offense is almost exactly average.
2) Our offense performs worse than most teams would when faced with a good defense and better than most teams would when faced with a bad defense. All teams production should fall off against good defenses, but ours declines more rapidly than usual as opposing defenses get better.We can analyze the reasons for this, but it looks like a pretty consistent trend. This is, of course, the worst kind of playoff offense around since you want them to step up to the challenge, instead of backing down. If we want to win the SB, we may have to beat the Ravens, Titans, Giants, or Eagles. The good news is we play the Chargers this week.
Against the Chargers, we continued that trend of shredding bad defenses, blowing away their usual scoring defense, although we underperformed their average yardage by 7 yards. We then beat the Ravens season averages by a point and a handful of yards, but only after Carey Davis and Limas Sweed took finished off the last of their healthy CB's. We certainly didn't do that running the ball. We are fortunate that that was the only "top" defense standing between us and the SB trophy.
On the other side, during the regular season, the Cardinals defense was 19th in yardage, 28th in scoring, 30th in passer rating, and 11th in rushing YPC. If you're a FO believer, they were 21st in DVOA, 23rd against the pass, and 15th against the run.
They've played better in the playoffs, but not exceptionally so. They've averaged 324 yards (would have been 12th in the regular season) and 21 points (14th, reg. season) in games against a rookie QB and huge QB meltdown (not that they don't get any credit for that). They've gotten a ton of turnovers, but especially the Panthers game had "outlier" written all over it. They did actually get one more turnover than we did in the regular season, but ended +0 in overall ratio, whereas we were +4.
So looking at the stats, they look like a poor defense that has stepped it up to average in the playoffs, which still bodes well for our offense. Looking away from the numbers for a moment, I've been harping on this a lot, but the Steelers offense struggles against 2 things: man press coverage on the WR's, and athletic, penetrating defenders. The Cardinals have no shortage of penetrating defenders: Dockett, Berry, Dansby and Wilson are all good pass rushers would could also disrupt our POS zone running game. However, they don't have a CB like Sheldon Brown or Carlos Rogers who can disrupt quick timing routes with successful jams. I have no doubt that DRC will do a good job on Holmes, but he's a lanky speed guy, and I question how well he'll do in this area. If Holmes beat the jam and beats him to the inside on a blitz, he could be running for a long time. On the other side, Hood is bigger, but he's also easier to run away from. If the Cards want to consistently blitz Wilson and/or Dansby, they are going to risk some big RAC plays on quick slants and drags. So basically, I don't think they can do what the Eagles did to us.
The Cardinals defense matches up with us a little better than the Chargers defense did - especially in the running game - so I don't think this is going to be a cake walk. However, there's isn't much reason to think they'll be able to get our offense into self-destruct mode, and I think Ben will have some success against their secondary. I still say if we can run the ball, it's over.
3 recs |
54 comments
Comments
Dude.
Great stats. Good write up.
"Whaddya' mean all the beer is gone..?
by OhioYinzer on Jan 27, 2009 4:07 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Man, I've been really looking forward to this very thing...Thanks...
Thoughtful discussion with a sense of history
by maryrose on Jan 27, 2009 4:47 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
ncie Bad
Good stuff.
I’ve been too busy to write like I want to :( but I believe that FWP is going to be the game’s MVP. I too agree that if we can run it, this one’s history.
by Blitzburgh on Jan 27, 2009 5:05 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
if they put their 'speed' CB on Holmes
who covers Nate the Great? Would it be Rolle?
Maybe some opportunities on that side?
by 703Steeler on Jan 27, 2009 5:09 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Even if we can't run it
we have to try. More mistakes will be made in the air than on the ground. We have to pound pound pound. Nice write up. I like our chances of the ground game. No it won’t be a 146yd day for willie but a close to or even 100 yd day would say a lot of things.
by Hochuli loves Broccoli on Jan 27, 2009 5:27 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
unless he breaks his own single carry yardage record that he set in the previous steeler superbowl...
you never know with a SB- there’s always a huge play or two, let’s hope they are all carried out by pitts.
by SteelersVT on Jan 28, 2009 8:06 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
lest we forget
San Diego’s defense had also played very well the weekend before they came to Pittsburgh, shutting down Peyton Manning and a red-hot Colts team. In that context I thought the Steeler offense looked astonishingly good in that game.
In any case, though, great breakdown. If our defense plays the way they have all year, and the offense can control the ball and the clock the way they did against the Chargers, it’s going to be very, very hard for AZ to win this game.
P is for Latrobe.
by holiday park on Jan 27, 2009 5:31 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
true
but the chargers D always seems to come up big against the colts for some reason… idk why they struggle so much against the 3-4
by steelersfan86 on Jan 27, 2009 9:42 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
It could be deja vu
I think the Steelers are gonna come out like they did vs the Colts during SB XL run.
If I were a betting man, I’d bet that they take to the air early and often and shift more and more to the run once they get a lead and then they’ll put in some long bomb attempts mixed in with the run.
The above assumes the plan works…if they are behind, expect even more passing.
Of course I could be wrong and they will establish the run first….but if they want to put the Cards on their heels, they’ll want a fast strike and make them feel like they have to catch up.
L!
by Ragnar808 on Jan 27, 2009 7:41 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Cards defense didn't look so hot against Eagles
The Eagles scored 25 points, which would have been 30 if Akers didn’t have a horrible day, missing an XP and a 47-yard FG (indoors). And it could easily have been 34 or 38 points if McNabb didn’t make some awful throws to wide-open receivers, as Troy Aikman highlighted on TV.
The Eagles rang up 454 yards of total offense, including 357 yards passing. They had only 97 yards rushing because they were behind most of the day, but they still averaged a whopping 5.4 yards per rush. Heck, the Cardinals forced only one punt the entire game. And I don’t consider the Eagles to be an elite offense. They have a great RB, a good QB, and what else?
So the Cardinals D put up good numbers against a rookie QB and a QB that was having trouble remembering which color jerseys his teammates were wearing. They got ripped by a reasonably competent offense, despite having home-field advantage. As long as Big Ben doesn’t start throwing the ball to the wrong team, I don’t see why the Steelers can’t put up at least as many points as the Eagles did. Or as many as they scored against the Chargers.
by Steelin on Jan 27, 2009 7:41 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Offense
I would love to see FWP have a huge game but…
I also would like BA to mix in some no-huddle. I think Cards will play a lot of cover 2 to keep from giving up the big play…whiz would rather make Ben work for it and hopes he gets impatient and forces some throws. They will also mix it up by bringing their SS Wilson up around LOS on run blitzes…the guy is great around los.
My thinking is, our no-huddle can change the pace of the game, keep them off-balance. I think the TE, Hines, and the middle of the field in general, will be open for the short to medium passes (similar to our 1st game with SD). While I really like FWP, I want to see MMoore more involved…swing passes, check downs can be huge in big games (and the SB doesn’t get any bigger), screens etc. Check out some of the past SB’s with the likes of Brady, Manning, Aikman and you’d be amazed how many of their throws are to the RB out of the backfield. I want to see MM involved…
by SteelerMike on Jan 27, 2009 8:26 PM EST reply actions 1 recs
rec'ed
Good stuff Mike. Some no huddle would be great to keep them off balance and in bad match ups personnel wise.
by Blitzburgh on Jan 27, 2009 9:14 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
speaking of wilson
I remember his pick in the endzone in the 07 game, that was a killer. He’s a guy to watch out for. The cards also completely shut down the run in that game.
by vherub on Jan 28, 2009 11:58 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
GM article
Hey guys, check out this article!
http://www.fanzak.com/fzrants/General_Manager_20_1
by fanzak123 on Jan 27, 2009 8:41 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
I agree with the concept of our "D" vs. their "O"
But I think there is a caveat. If our Defense can get consistent pressure in their backfield then Arizona’s will counter with a short passing offense which would probably lower the score even more.
Ultimately I think the game hinges on our ability to run out the clock by running/scoring and limiting their time on of possession.
by Steev1705 on Jan 27, 2009 9:32 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Steelers O vs 3-4
Been awhile, glad to get back and reved up for the game…
A point made by …fan86 was that the Colts struggle against the 3-4. The Steelers on the other hand seem to have some success against it themselves albeit in rather close games at times. The Ravens, Chargers and Pats come to mind – at least this year. The Steelers were able to move the ball when they needed to and did not commit turnovers.
An old coaching addage I subscribe to regarding defense is – they defend well what they do well. On offense this is reversible – teams attack well what they see often. The Steelers have been the preemminent 3-4 team in the league since the Giants great teams of the 80’s. They know how to run it, the offense sees it and works against it. The Cards are multiple front defensively, but their pressure packages have been from a lot of 3 down fronts. Our offense should be able to rep against it pretty well.
This game will require similar tactics to the close games which they have won – move the ball whichever way ends up working and ultimately score as much as you need to. We all want to score every possession, but jeopardizing field position and giving up turnovers must be avoided. They did pretty well against some good teams this year.
I find it encouraging that the Steelers kept running the ball vs the Ravens even though it was not adding up to much – they had to keep defending it and that gave us some opportunities in the pass game. FWP and the lads don’t need to dominate the game – they must be a consistent threat. MM needs to have a good game in protection and as a receiver. Miller may be a key component – Ward is slowed, Sweed is unproven and Holmes will get defensive attention. Washington and Miller will have to make plays when it counts.
Ben may be the hole card ultimately. Warner will not choke – he may end up on his ass a lot (we hope!!) but he won’t pull a Jake. The guy is polished and will compete under pressure. Ben played like a rookie in their last SB victory. He’s played in a lot of big games since. I have been worried about him with the concussions and moments of poor judgement BUT the guy beat Baltimore in the AFC championship. Yes, their D was a little beat up, but they were still formidable. If he plays well and doesn’t make the big mistake(s) early – he shouldn’t have to be a superhero late. Doesn’t mean he won’t be the MVP, he just doesn’t have to be incredible for 4 quarters. He has done a great job of late being average when average was good enough and being great when needed. He doesn’t throw for 400 yards, not even 300 yards like the Peyton’s and Brady’s. He needs to extend plays when able and make it hurt, throw it away at times and live to fight again.
Lastly, I think the 2 weeks off will hurt the Cards worse. Their offense was red hot and it can’t help them to wait this long. We have more SB experience which just means that we shouldn’t be the team that Shits the Bed first. Even if Boldin is healthier, Ward’s recovery and LeBeau having the time to dissect things should help us…. rant over.
"Franz" in NoCal
by franz on Jan 28, 2009 1:33 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
Nicely done Franz
Your points are well made.
by Steev1705 on Jan 28, 2009 9:31 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Warner
I agree that Warner will not choke and make nervous mistakes. But he can hold on to the ball too long, which will hopefully lead to sacks and fumbles. He will also not see a defender and throw it right to him every so often. His last superbowl performance had a bunch of yards but more INTs than TDs. I mean the guy can play, so this is all wishful thinking. But if the Steelers can get a somewhat significant lead (10 pts. or so), a couple Warner mistakes could be had to seal the game.
Also lets hope the prospect of The Boss singing “Born to Run” at halftime (unlikely as it may be) puts a charge into Arians and FWP to chew up some yardage on the ground.
by HoustonPA on Jan 28, 2009 11:14 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I don’t know why you guys don’t think Warner won’t choke. He’s had several 3-interception games this year, and can be pressured into bad decisions. He’s far from a man of stone.
by steelguy99 on Jan 28, 2009 11:20 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I think he can be pressured into mistakes for sure, but I don’t think that is the same as choking. Choking would be if he had all day in the pocket and still overthrew guys or threw into coverage. If he is pressured and makes mistakes, that’s different, because every guy who is pressured makes more bad decisions.
But I do think/hope he will be under constant pressure, which could easily lead to a few INTs and the game.
by HoustonPA on Jan 28, 2009 11:39 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
man the "boss"- finally a superbowl halftime show that i wont put on mute
Springsteen is what I grew up with- Born in the USA, especially!
by SteelersVT on Jan 28, 2009 12:33 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
anyone have a gun...
I might need to shot myself during halftime
by badmatty53 on Jan 28, 2009 5:22 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
should it be "pull a flacco", "pull an o'donell"..?
by SteelersVT on Jan 28, 2009 12:34 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I dunno, the Delhomme meltdown was of gigantic proportions! And it was against a less then amazing defense.
by Chicago Steeler on Jan 28, 2009 1:06 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
this is why i'm confident going into sunday
Really enjoyed this stat breakdown, because I think it puts the Steelers’ offensive performance in proper perspective. It’s important to remember that this really was a banner year for defense in the NFL (i.e., Pittsburgh, Baltimore, Tennessee, Philly, the Giants), and every football fan knows that it’s nearly impossible to really torch a great defense. So you can reasonably argue that the Steelers’ middling offensive output was at least partly attributable to a difficult schedule where they faced so many tough defenses. This breakdown actually made me feel a lot better about the O: what I read here is that we were right around average against stout defenses, and above-average against mediocre-to-bad defenses. And we’re going into a big game against a mediocre-to-bad defense.
I agree with Franz that the time off will probably hurt the Cardinals more: it can’t help a streaky team’s momentum to have to cool their heels for 2 weeks. On the Pittsburgh side, I think if rust were going to be an issue it would have presented itself in the San Diego game (i.e., coming off a bye, a blowout win before it where the starters only played a half, and a loss before that, and playing a red-hot team eager to avenge a close loss).
I also agree that Warner won’t choke the game away, but it’s a good bet the Steelers will get pressure on him, and most QBs start to make mistakes when they get knocked around (witness how Flacco played in the AFC title game under pressure, in contrast to how he played with excellent protection against the Titans). And let’s also keep the hype in perspective: the Steelers have done well against “unstoppable” offenses all year, and all the talk of Warner as some unbeatable force of nature is, well, a recent development. Other teams have been trendy picks against Pittsburgh all year, and it’s tended to work well for us.
P is for Latrobe.
by holiday park on Jan 28, 2009 10:22 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
This is a great post
Probably because I agree with every word of it.
The Cardinals are a streaky, emotional team. They just as likely to lose by 40 pts as they are to win by 30. The past few weeks they have been on a serious emotional high. The two week wait til game time might cool them off a bit.
The Steelers, on the other hand, are a very consistent team. Outside of the Tennessee game, they have put in pretty much the same performance every week. The results only differed because of a big play or two and the difference in the quality of opponent.
Hmm, where have the Steelers seen a “great” offense with two “amazing” receivers before this year? How about New England, with Cassell coming off of two straight 400 yd games and everyone in the media crowning him the next Tom Brady. The Pats O was supposed to spread out our D and give Lebeau’s guys fits. We all know how that turned out. The fact is, our D is better than any offense in the league. And our offense is good enough to win with.
This game is going to be very similar to PIT/NE and PIT/SD. The Cards will come out hot and flying on adrenaline. They will put points on the board in the first 1-2 drives. It will be close going into the half. We will pull away in the 3rd quarter and then cruise to victory on a 2-3 score lead in the 4th.
by JHolmes on Jan 28, 2009 12:01 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
It would not surprise me if our defense did well against the cardinals, maybe not NE level, but an impressive showing nonetheless.
On offense though I don’t think we will do as well. Against the 3-4’s of NE/SD we were able to establish the run. Without establishing the run this game is going to be tight, and I remain unconvinced that we can run on any 4-3 teams.
by steelguy99 on Jan 28, 2009 12:11 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
yeah, i thnk our defense is going to want to set the tone of the game early on.
I expect notices to be sent to WR’s- just hope they dont have to cart any more opposing team’s WR’s off the field, but anything just under that is fine by me.
by SteelersVT on Jan 28, 2009 12:45 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
James Harrison quote from SB
“We aren’t out to ‘injure’ anybody, but we are out to hurt you.”
by Jonny B. on Jan 28, 2009 12:55 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I rewound that about 4 times
and I almost put it in my sig
"It was an attrition football game and you know we like that."
by showtime on Jan 28, 2009 8:12 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
the other thing
I wonder how well the Cardinals will adjust to being a trendy pick in such a big game. It’s fair to argue that they snuck up on each of their playoff opponents, and after such a lackluster regular season they certainly had few expectations being placed on them before wild card weekend. I don’t think you can say the same thing after 2 weeks of hype, being told how great your QB and receivers are and having talking heads on ESPN and elsewhere picking you to win. There are definitely some expectations now.
P is for Latrobe.
by holiday park on Jan 28, 2009 1:38 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Our defense is going to be pissed.
by steelguy99 on Jan 28, 2009 3:13 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Our trend
I for one noticed the same thing, although not with cool nifty stats.
We do seem to sputter like a car on bad gas when we play a top defense. Which as you said is somewhat expected, yet not quite as much as when we do it.
However, its still worth noting we WON most of those games.
Personally the whole Cards playoff run feels somewhat off. The rookie boofed it in game one,
Jake the Mistake just absolutely screwed them. I believe Brian St. Pierre could’ve done better.
And McNabb McSucked also for most of that game.
I dont think they’ve played anybody to the caliber of our team. No Big Bens, No Troy Polamalus, no James Harrisons, no Hines Wards (steve smith is good but different).
We got this thang
by Mechem on Jan 28, 2009 12:23 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
no jinxes, mechem
they’ve still got to play the game
P is for Latrobe.
by holiday park on Jan 28, 2009 1:05 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
+1
I will remain nervous until the game clock expires. At which time my blood pressure will probably drop 20 points or so until next season begins.
by Chicago Steeler on Jan 28, 2009 1:15 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
ha
Not to bring on any jinx of my own, but (assuming the Steelers bring their A game, assuming they can run on AZ’s defense, assuming they shut down Warner, etc etc) the greatest gift the Steelers could give to their fans would be to go up 4 touchdowns in the first quarter and run away with the game. Can you imagine what it would be like to watch a Steeler victory that you could spend three quarters celebrating?
But like I said, that’s thinking a little too far ahead.
P is for Latrobe.
by holiday park on Jan 28, 2009 1:31 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Sadly,
If we do win this game all we will hear from the opposing teams fans is “This guy on our team blew it.” “They had an off day” “Your team got lcuky”, etc. etc.
You would think a guy would get used to it being a fan of the team with the worse record in the NFL.
It’s definately fun to come over here and read about how great you guys are and all of the ways you will win. I’m not saying you won’t I guess i just have a different not being one that’s routing for a pretty decent sure bet year in and year out.
by badmatty53 on Jan 28, 2009 5:32 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
the things is, if you watched all the Steelers game this year
is that the Steelers Defense isn’t just about stats and points. They have made plays that were the deciding factor in key games.
The first and third baltimore games – both had defensive scores to win the game. One was for the AFC Crown.
cowboys – Townsend to the dome to get the go ahead points
patriots – our D just demolished cassel & co. 5 turnovers I think. Our O left about 17 points on the field that day
San Diego first time – did you see Polamalu’s pick? end of story there
San Diego second time – they only got one play in the third quarter! Props to Fast Willie there too, but damn.
I could go on.
And the Steeler’s O is on an upswing, similar to AZ’s. It’s just that the media isn’t crowing about that.
My point? Yes I have one. Fans that have watched all the Steelers game this year realize that this is a special team. A badass, hardcore, team-first band of brothers and all they care about is winning. We have a battle-tested QB along with many others who have played on this biggest of stages. The Coach already has a ring of his own as well.
Anything can happen any Sunday, but there’s a good reason why we’re confident.
"It was an attrition football game and you know we like that."
by showtime on Jan 28, 2009 8:25 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
so
You logged onto a Steelers blog and were surprised to find a pro-Steelers bias? Um . . . okay.
P is for Latrobe.
by holiday park on Jan 28, 2009 5:51 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I like how you cherry-pick the optimistic posts and pretend like we are all wearing rose-colored glasses. If you think we are a fanbase that constantly makes excuses like “they had an off day” yadda yadda, then you don’t know anything about us. And that’s okay, you have no reason to know anything about the steelers and their fans, just like we know nothing about the 13 cardinals fans that will be at the superbowl.
You’re making incorrect assumptions and using selective evidence as an argument. If you’d care to debate any of the points that people are posting, that commentary is very welcome. If you’re just going to insult us, then go away.
by steelguy99 on Jan 28, 2009 10:04 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Not trying to debate or prove points
My post is directed at all of the “Delhomme lost the game”, “Flacco palyed like a rookie”, “McNabb was horrible” commentary that I’m reading hear and elsewhere. No one is saying “Cardinals secondary really stepped up”, “they gave Flacco had no time”, “McNabb was scrambling around and doing everything he could”
Please don’t get me wrong. I respect your team, they play great ball and rightly so, you should be talking them up at your sight. I will just be curious to see the fans commentary if the Cardinals win the game.
by badmatty53 on Jan 29, 2009 5:22 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
McNabb shredded you guys
Sure he missed a few open throws, but he threw for 375 yards.
charity standing orders
by BadMaafala on Jan 29, 2009 6:05 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
+1
Go to the Eagles SB sight, you won’t read that anywhere.
by badmatty53 on Jan 30, 2009 10:50 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Regardless of what any crazy Philly fans think
McNabb was not why they lost. If you have the #3 defense in the country, you expect not to be losing by at halftime. When you throw for 375 yards and 25 points, you expect to win. When you take the lead in the forth quarter, you expect to at least hold the other team to a FG and have one last shot at the end. Akers, the running game, Jim Johnson, and the whole defense all deserve a large portion of the blame, but not McNabb.
And after poking around BGN for about 30 seconds, I did find a post/poll that overwhelmingly supported McNabb. If they thought it was his fault, I doubt they’d support him so unilaterally.
charity standing orders
by BadMaafala on Jan 30, 2009 1:44 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
whatever you say
Um, Delhomme threw FIVE interceptions! Is it really that hard to believe that a disinterested observer would hypothesize that he lost the game for Carolina?
But what do we know? We’re just bandwagon fans rooting for a decent sure thing every year. I mean, when my family first moved to Pittsburgh and Mark Malone was our QB, I knew I was turning into a total front-runner and I didn’t care.
As far as this Sunday’s game: after years of watching entirely too much football, I tend to believe that the better team always wins if they bring their A game; when a superior team loses, it’s because they’re overconfident or unprepared. Exhibit A would be last year’s Super Bowl. And having seen both teams more than a few times this year, I believe the Steelers are the better team. Maybe not by a lot, and maybe the contrasting strengths make the comparison difficult, but they are. When the Penguins went into last year’s Stanley Cup finals, I hoped for the best but knew the Red Wings were the superior team, so I was disappointed but not shocked when Pittsburgh lost. But if the Steelers lose this Sunday, everything I know about football will make it hard for me to attribute that to anything other than lack of preparation. Sorry, but that’s my judgment of the question.
P is for Latrobe.
by holiday park on Jan 29, 2009 8:19 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Welcome
Good teams’ fans talk trash. If the Cardinals become more than a one hit wonder you may become a trash talker too. The Crads may win but that doesn’t change the fact that the Steelers are as advertised. My point: Just because you beat the Eagles doesn’t mean Philly is a bad team. They are actually very good. Congrats you beat a good team. You may hear some excuses from fans if we lose but you won’t hear any from the players. Fans talk trash and make excuses. You say you will have fun coming over to see what excuses are made. I wonder if you will come back for more trash talk after you lose. Let me tell you this: You are going to learn a new experience no matter what. You will either finally know what it’s like to see your team win the big one or you will experience a pain that you’ve ever felt: getting to the Big Game and losing. Trust me, you better hope you win because it hurst to lose the big one (anger) worse than not making the playoffs (disappointment).
"The team that scores the most points wins."
John Madden
(Master of the obvious)
by PixburghArn on Jan 30, 2009 10:10 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Sorry
I did not purposely call them that crads. That is a typo.
"The team that scores the most points wins."
John Madden
(Master of the obvious)
by PixburghArn on Jan 30, 2009 11:05 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Im optimistically curious
Thats how I’d put it. I honestly recognize the fact Arizona presents a unique challenge like we havent really played all year, but at the same time our D has yet to get beat. And so at that, I feel pretty good.
But of course Sunday will tell all
by Mechem on Jan 28, 2009 4:06 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I almost wish...
I never found this site !! I have coached for 25 years and I almost never get as nervous as I do thinking about a Steelers playoff or SB game.
Maybe it’s because I believe I can help my team by making good calls and by scouting and breaking down film – I have an outlet. I can’t do anything to help the Steelers even if I think I know what is coming !!
There are a lot of things I don’t like about the NFL but I still love watching and rooting for the Stillers. I’m getting all geeked up now, maybe I better take a break…. I may have a Hat-Attack as they say in Baston !!
"Franz" in NoCal
by franz on Jan 28, 2009 4:48 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Nice write up but...
you’re way too smart for me. Does this mean that we’re going to win?
by NoCal-SteelCity on Jan 29, 2009 6:25 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
It means I like our chances. The only time our offense struggled against a defense that wasn’t in the top 10 was in Cleveland during a hurricane. The only game we lost against a defense that was in the top 10 was Indianapolis. If Ben avoids turnovers like he had against Indy, we’ve got a great chance to win.
charity standing orders
by BadMaafala on Jan 30, 2009 9:36 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Man, I’d love to rewatch that cleveland game. It was unexciting for the most part and a nailbiter, but I remember how impressed I was by Ben’s throwing in that game. He seemed used to playing with 50 mph gusts.
by steelguy99 on Jan 30, 2009 9:53 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs

by 



















