3 Reasons why the Steelers win Sunday
With the matchups now decided, here are 3 very simple reasons that I firmly believe will lead to a Steeler victory.
1. West coast teams suck on the east Coast. This has been proven true in both directions, but especially west to east. The Chargers have one win on the east coast, Tampa Bay. But that was against a falling NFC opponent. Their other losses on the east include teams such as Buffalo, Miami, and the fun London game. I expect the trend to continue
2. The Chargers are hurting. While Pittsburgh has been getting rest, the Chargers have been getting walloped. Several injuries were noted prior to saturday's game, and more came after. LT is still likely to be scantily used. Gates doesnt quite have the same spring in his step. And their OLBs are sore. The Steelers however are fresh and ready for action. Ben's concussion is minor and should be fine.
3. Lastly, and I dont even think this needs to be mentioned, but Ignatius Philip Rivers is going to be facing the #1 defense in the land. The Chargers defense is down there in the 20's. While they put up a solid effort against the Colts, they had a really tough time in the mire of Heinz Field a couple months ago, expect the same again..
I'd like to also comment about Ben and the stretcher being called out. One time i crashed my Jeep into two cars. I fell asleep at a light as soon as it went green. I hit both cars then woke up. Low speed collision, no air bags, probably <30 mph.
But they told me since I complained of a headache I should be strapped down and taken to the hospital. So I too have been strapped to a board and hauled into an ambulance. I was totally fine though. MRI showed no problems.
Ben is likely in the same boat. I think that was a precautionary measure. After all, you take good care of your 100 million dollar man. His legs were moving too when he landed so he wasnt out cold.
I expect him at 100% and I expect an excellent victory whilst I watch from the 5 yard line, steelers bench side, front row.
0 recs |
50 comments
Comments
Nice
I’ll be looking at you from my seat, on my couch, 5 yards away from my TV. Mechem, bring 2 terrible towels and a megaphone. I want Heinz field to blow out my sound system on 3rd down. Go Steelers!
by SoCalSteelerFan on
Jan 5, 2009 12:37 AM EST
reply
actions
0 recs
$100 million investment
I hope we can protect Ben a bit better in this one. We’ll know whether he’s okay or not by the 2nd series. I hope and expect to see a very confident and spry Ben. If that’s what we see…..I think it’s game over for the Bolts.
Also, I’m hoping that we see a bigger commitment in the future to keeping Ben upright. Tough with the injuries to Simmons and Smith this year…….but I really do think it’s time to get some immediate help – using our 1st round pick and also dipping into the FA market to grab a tackle. I don’t want to rip on anyone of our guys in particular, but Ben won’t get the chance to reach his very high ceiling until we invest in help for him.
by SteelerNorth on
Jan 5, 2009 1:30 AM EST
reply
actions
0 recs
I will.
Willie Colon….cough cough.
by SteelerDomination on
Jan 5, 2009 1:33 AM EST
reply
actions
0 recs
+200
He is honestly right up there with ugly women and rabid bears on the things I dont like scale.
by Mechem on
Jan 5, 2009 11:33 AM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Football Outsiders positional analysis
FO ranked Colon 32nd of 32 players at his position. If they ran an all-time worst at his position, I suspect that he’d rank in the bottom five…
by ec on
Jan 5, 2009 1:58 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I envy you
you get to go to the game.
and great seats!
sucks to live in NC sometimes…..
But anyhoo, also note that OAKLAND, yes the raiders beat the Bucs in TB. wow…..
SD did play us tough in Pittsburgh earlier tho, but there was a 13-1 turnover ratio
by Bleed-Black&Gold on
Jan 5, 2009 2:29 AM EST
reply
actions
0 recs
Yep`
so that east coast win doesnt mean much then if the raiders can do it eh?
And I shall bring at least one towel and mask and jersey. I will take a pic of myself for you guys to see me so you know who to look for
by Mechem on
Jan 5, 2009 4:22 AM EST
reply
actions
0 recs
Weather may have an impact.
Can SD stay with a physical team for 60 min. in the cold? I’d like to see us use a fullback and run willie down their throats until they cry uncle.
by qwikdoc on
Jan 5, 2009 9:32 AM EST
reply
actions
0 recs
SD wins the FB matchup
Did you see Hester, a tailback by trade, take out two Colts as the FB in LT’s TD run? A good fullback can make even small backs like Sproles and LT effective in short yardage. It’s amazing what a fullback can do in short yardage. Remember how good Jerome was in short yardage? He ran behind a fullback.
by CarlWeathersMustache on
Jan 5, 2009 10:53 AM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Agreed
Bend em and beat em. They’ll break. Pansy teams huddle up by the heater when they play Pittsburgh. While we huddle up and pick apart their offense.
by Mechem on
Jan 5, 2009 10:16 AM EST
reply
actions
0 recs
Kill Them
LT is hurt, and let’s hope Ben doesn’t feel too jumpy back there. We all know for a fact that when Ben ain’t healthy and feeling good back there, he makes bad decisions (like the season after his accident). Hopefully he’ll practice this week and we are healthy going froward. If we have our team healthy no charger can stop us. I too hope for more of the I formation as i believe Mchugh can handle his own
by TrueSteelerForLife on
Jan 5, 2009 10:55 AM EST
reply
actions
0 recs
Tomlin must apply his mid-season principle to Ben. If ben is healthy enough to practice, he practices and plays. If he can’t practice, he can’t play.
Ben will practice. Ben will play.
by steelguy99 on
Jan 5, 2009 11:19 AM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I'd rather face LT than Sproles
… and I hope he rushes back and tries to play. Preseason, I thought LT might break down this year; I don’t know if his career is over, but he won’t be effective until he gets healthy. I’m really not all that scared of Sproles either (145 yards from scrimage against the Colts – whoopdie do), but he’s a bigger threat if Farrior or Foote have to tackle him in the open field than Tomlinson would be.
The key to the game will be getting the running game going. Ben will get yards, but if we get moving on the ground, Ben will be able to pick his spots better and not make mistakes. Parker had a great game earlier against the Chargers, and it helped keep their awful pass defense off balance. The Chargers will not be able to move the ball consistently against us, so we should try to wear their defense down, control the clock, and limit mistakes. It’d be nice to get TD’s instead of FG’s, but I’d be fine winning 12-3, too.
charity standing orders
by BadMaafala on
Jan 5, 2009 11:18 AM EST
reply
actions
0 recs
History is on the Chargers side
Lest we not forget the the Chargers have beaten us twice in the playoffs in Pittsburgh. The last time being the AFC Championship game in which we were double digit favorites. We had a bad ass defense then too, but couldnt get 2 yards when we needed it (sounds like us on the goal line this year).
This game has me really nervous. Everything points to a Steelers win, but “Any Given Sunday” rings truest in the playoffs. This game will be close, SD has momentum, and you can throw weather and travel out the window.
by vanslyke on
Jan 5, 2009 3:32 PM EST
reply
actions
0 recs
relax
The only way the chargers threaten us on sunday is if the line doesn’t protect BB. I would argue that weather and travel to a cold heinz field for a west coast team is more of a factor than history. The only relevant history is this year. Yes we only won 11 – 10 but the game wasn’t nearly that close. Yardage: 410 to 218. Possesion: 36min to 24min. FWP: 115 yds. That game was only close because
BB was sacked 4 times and we all know how skiddish he gets when heavily pressured. I have confidence the coaching staff will have our well-rested line ready to handle the tired charger D
by qwikdoc on
Jan 5, 2009 5:36 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
The only way the chargers threaten us on sunday is if the line doesn’t protect BB.
That’s been the story all year long. The problem is…the O-line fails almost every week.
by steelguy99 on
Jan 5, 2009 5:45 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I guess we shouldn’t bother to address the problem in the off-season then since we have such a good record?
by steelguy99 on
Jan 5, 2009 6:01 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
That’s when it should be addressed. Hopefully colbert will do his job this year and address it.
by qwikdoc on
Jan 5, 2009 6:03 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Your solution to winning is that the O-line protects Ben.
This hinges upon the O-line protecting Ben, which they do not.
We can win no matter what, but having confidence in Arians/Z and our well-rested line is idiotic at this point.
by steelguy99 on
Jan 5, 2009 6:12 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I said that’s the only way they threaten us. That’s a far cry from that’s the only way we win.
by qwikdoc on
Jan 5, 2009 6:18 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Yeah its not about the O-line its about turnovers
Taking a sack is better than a fumble lost or a pick. Ben cannot pull a Titans repeat and start losing the ball every which way.
by Mechem on
Jan 5, 2009 6:17 PM EST
reply
actions
0 recs
The O-line does directly lead to that though. Flustered Ben = turnovers. Pressured + Fleeing Ben = strip sack.
Is Ben just not taking care of the ball this year, or is there just that much more pressure than there was last year? 14 fumbles by ben this year compared to 9 last year? Ugh.
by steelguy99 on
Jan 5, 2009 6:45 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
it sure has seemed like more pressure this year. That would mean willie bowel has gotten worse instead of better. He needs to be the first to go at the end of this year.
by qwikdoc on
Jan 5, 2009 6:51 PM EST
reply
actions
0 recs
Meh
Ben had all F’in day in Tennessee. He was double and triple pumping which is why he had a poor hold on the ball when he finally did get hit.
When you figure we were almost exactly at last years sack total, yet have 50% more Fumbles by the QB, that means we are facing MORE pressure.
Fumbles to me are all about the QB and the way they take care of the ball. Picks are part pressure too but again he doesnt HAVE to throw it into coverage.
by Mechem on
Jan 5, 2009 8:00 PM EST
reply
actions
0 recs
Ben wouldn’t have had as many fumbles this year if he wouldn’t hold on to the ball so damn long. Of course he made some crucial plays too by holding on to the ball. I just hope he can check down quickly and make quick decisions sunday because turnovers definitely make or break games in the playoffs
by qwikdoc on
Jan 5, 2009 8:24 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Officiating crew...
Hopefully it isn’t Scott Green from the earlier match up.
Penalties: PIT 13 for 115 and SD 2 for 5.
And a really big blunder, but it had no effect on the win/loss.
by ZnJersey on
Jan 6, 2009 2:28 AM EST
reply
actions
0 recs
and
evidently big blunders don’t keep crews from working the playoffs. Ed Hercules and his crew worked the Ravens-Dolphins game.
by qwikdoc on
Jan 6, 2009 10:29 AM EST
reply
actions
0 recs
About that
Did anyone else notice the insane amount of holding the Ravens did both on O and D…
I dont think if a huge game costing mistake occurs you should be able to work playoffs personally.
by Mechem on
Jan 6, 2009 10:34 AM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Luckily for the crews, the league assesses their whole body of work. I don’t know how much a huge blunder like hochuli’s affects their final rating but I read somewhere that he and his crew were the highest rated for this season.
by qwikdoc on
Jan 6, 2009 10:43 AM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
The Gun Show
I have to stick up for my man Hochuli. He is generally one of the better referees in the NFL. Besides, his call wasn’t that bad: he had to make the call at regular speed in a split second during the play. The only reason the call has taken on a life of its own is because the replay rules make it unreviewable.
Lots of referees have made bad calls that have costed teams games. One of the big reasons Hochuli is taking heat is because he fell on his sword like a man: after the game he said he blew it. The Thanksgiving day Lions/Steelers game was way worse: the call wasn’t even during gameplay. Still, that referee never owned up and admitted he made a bad call. But it happens to the best.
by CarlWeathersMustache on
Jan 6, 2009 11:57 AM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
GRRRRRR
"When Bellotti attempted to shake the hand of Oklahoma State quarterback Zac Robinson after the game, Robinson offered his left hand. His right was swollen and battered from the Ducks' defense."
by MarineCorpsDuck on
Jan 6, 2009 2:26 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
haha
I wonder if the betting line would change if they announced Hochuli was doing the game…
charity standing orders
by BadMaafala on
Jan 6, 2009 2:56 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I wonder if he can stand in front of Manumaleuna as Polamalu & Harrison converge on the most violent collision ever on a football field. Not that I want the guy to get hurt or anything.
"When Bellotti attempted to shake the hand of Oklahoma State quarterback Zac Robinson after the game, Robinson offered his left hand. His right was swollen and battered from the Ducks' defense."
by MarineCorpsDuck on
Jan 6, 2009 3:00 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Because you’d never cheer for injuries.
by steelguy99 on
Jan 6, 2009 3:12 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Nope. Not me.
"When Bellotti attempted to shake the hand of Oklahoma State quarterback Zac Robinson after the game, Robinson offered his left hand. His right was swollen and battered from the Ducks' defense."
by MarineCorpsDuck on
Jan 6, 2009 4:00 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Has anyone
ever heard exactly why the NFL won’t make their officiating a full time occupation? It seems it would create more consistency and the crews could be held more accountable.
by qwikdoc on
Jan 6, 2009 10:48 AM EST
reply
actions
0 recs
Their salaries range
anywhere from $40,000 to $120,000. That’s for 16 games. What are they supposed to be doing during the off-season, if you hire them full time? If you meant pay them more money, I don’t see how this holds them more accountable or what prevents them from earning extra money anyway during the off-season.
by Jonny B. on
Jan 6, 2009 11:01 AM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I’d be happy to have the refs work grounds crew at heinz in the off-season.
by steelguy99 on
Jan 6, 2009 11:05 AM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
They spend considerable off season time in classroom or wherever practicing game situations and improving their officiating skill. I think then they can be held more accountable. I don’t know where their salaries rank in pro sports but the NFL can afford to make officiating a full time job. The other major sports have. Like any occupation, I think the more time you devote to it, the better you will get at it.
by qwikdoc on
Jan 6, 2009 11:14 AM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
They rank relatively low,
but like I said, they only officiate 16 games, not 82 or 162.
by Jonny B. on
Jan 6, 2009 11:19 AM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
The seasons are about the same length when you count preseason games. It just seems like for an operation like the NFL, where the officials are a crucial part of the games, to have an accountant or teacher or doctor or whatever spend all week at their job and show up on the weekend to ref a game is a little lacking. Maybe I’m wrong.
by qwikdoc on
Jan 6, 2009 11:38 AM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Not to be off topic but....
You cant make officials full-time. Watching film is not the same as officiating. What would you do with them during the season – hole them up in an office showing play after play? You cant have them officiate college or some other quasi pro league because the rules are different. It is the way it is – that is why there is replay.
by vanslyke on
Jan 6, 2009 11:57 AM EST
reply
actions
0 recs
Maybe hole them up in an office and force them to take tests? Maybe that way they know the effin rules?
Replay does no good when the referee doesn’t know what the correct rules are.
by steelguy99 on
Jan 6, 2009 12:06 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Maybe not quite full time
But I think they should start in July and do extra training conditioning and testing until the preseason. This way they are up to speed and refreshed in the head.
They work all the way through February, and the league pulls a few select plays from the year as a review. Then they are off for 3 months.
Pay them more sure. Give em another 25k for those 3 extra months.
by Mechem on
Jan 6, 2009 3:01 PM EST
reply
actions
0 recs










