State of the Union: Steelers 5-2 at the Break
One game short of the mid-season mark, the Pittsburgh Steelers find themselves with a 5-2 record and tied for the lead in the AFC North Division with Cincinnati. Stopping to reflect during the bye week, the glass is definitely more full than empty. Steeler Nation yearns so much for perfection, sometimes it harpoons whatever shortcomings the latest game delivers. Utopia would have the Steelers passing for 375 yards, rushing for 175, shutting down opponents defensively and not committing turnovers every single game.
The NFL is not Utopia. Last I checked, those other guys get paid handsomely, have full coaching staffs, high-tech facilities and don't buy into the Steelers having their way all the time. We've lost fourth-quarter leads, given up kickoff returns, missed field goals, dropped passes and at times not blocked or tackled very well. These maladies are a part of life in the NFL. While we cannot insist on avoiding them, we can hope that shortcomings can be corrected as opposed to having insufficient personnel. I believe the former as opposed to the latter and thus, hope springs eternal.
The Steelers have had several pleasant surprises through the first seven games. At the top of the list is Rashard Mendenhall. The guy is becoming more entrenched each week into the present and future of the Steelers. Not notoriously big or fast or quick, Mendenhall somehow blends all three together. He catches passes out of the backfield and can block the blitz. Statistically, Mendenhall has rushed for 418 yards in just 78 carries for a 5.4 average, ranking him third in the NFL in yards per carry among runnings backs with at least 75 carries. This coming from a man who missed virtually all of last season with an injury and up until Game 4 this season, was in Mike Tomlin's nonexistent doghouse. If this momentum continues, and Mendenhall keeps his head on straight and stays healthy, he will be the long-term answer. He shows instincts of busting outside and picking up huge chunks of yardage. Yes, he has fumbled, but they seem to be correctible. The last two were the result of fluke strip when he thought he was down and then not knowing where the goal line was. Yes, they are frustrating but yes, they are correctible with maturity (I hope).
Another surprise is the improved play of the Steelers' offensive line. By no means a finished product, each man on the line has stepped up a little which means collectively they have stepped up a lot. Max Starks is earning every penny of his new contract and is getting more comfortable with each game at left tackle. He is taking on the best NFL pass rushers and holding (don't take that literally) his own quite well. Kemo, Hartwig and veteran Trai Essex are getting along great in chemistry class holding down the middle of the fort. The right side, Essex and Colon, is the area where Mendenhall is gaining most of his yards, sometimes impressivlely. Like Mendenhall, the O-line is far from a polished product, but it is no longer the liability it has been in recent times. At least at the moment, the arrow is pointing up.
Mike Wallace is another surprise and is playing like we all hoped Limas Sweed he would. Rookies need to be awfully special to have impact with the Pittsburgh Steelers, and Wallace is having impact. Already with 368 receiving yards and a pair of scores, Wallace is eighth in the NFL with a 17.5 reception average and tied for 10th with eight catches for plus-20 yards. Hines Ward and Santonio Holmes are not surprises, but make up the best trio of receivers in the NFL this season. Ward is fourth in the league with 42 receptions, second with 602 yards and tied for the lead with 10 catches of plus-20 yards. Holmes has 30 receptions for 497 yards (10th), carries a 16.6 average (11th) and has eight grabs of more than 20 yards (tied at 10 with Wallace). Maximizing production and opportunity, 28 of Holmes' 30 receptions have moved the chains. There are not enough footballs to statistically do all three wideouts justice, but consider this: combined they have 1,467 yards (210 per game), a staggering 26 catches of 20-plus yards and almost 16 yards per catch.
Heath Miller has certainly not missed the party. His 40 receptions are 6th in the league and first among tight ends. With a solid 50 yards per game, Miller is tied for 10th in the league with four touchdowns and is 5th among tight ends with 17 first-down catches. It is hard to imagine anyone more consistent than Heath Miller.
Offensively, of course, the center of attention is Ben Roethlisberger, who is having a Pro Bowl season. He is second in the NFL with 2,062 passing yards, second in completion percentage (70.4), second in yards per attempt (9.25) and fifth with a 102.6 quarterback rating. Perhaps just as important as the statistics show, Big Ben seems to have a better feel for what the offensive line can do. He seems prepared to fire quickly if needed, but also has the instinct to wait for something longer if the line gives him time. This quarterback/O-line chemistry has not always existed.
Lastly on offense, in addition to all that we've seen, it is worth noting an element that we haven't seen. That is, the perpetual bashing of Offensive Coordinator Bruce Arians. I have been in the minority as a member of the Arians Fan Club, perhaps as a high-ranking officer, because I've maintained that the offensive line was the problem with the offense and Arians was the fall guy. Arians biggest problem of late is to call more plays for Mendenhall and Holmes, while maintaining the touch levels for Hines Ward and Heath Miller. His only hope for that is to lobby the NFL for 20-minute quarters. Steeler Nation is clamouring for more Mendenhall, while Tone is quietly hoping for more on his plate. The pie is only so big. If everyone deserves a bigger piece, then it must be a damn good pie.
The bottom line is that the Steelers are fifth in the NFL in passing yards per game, seventh in total yards per game and 13th in points per game. Moreover, Arians and Roethlisberger have put the offense in position to win every game this season. Were it not for two missed field goals in Chicago, and a dropped perfect touchdown pass in Cincinnati, the Steelers would be undefeated. The Steelers have played 424 minutes of football this season. Incredibly, they have only trailed in 15 of those minutes.
Turning to the other side of the ball, saying the Steelers' defense has slipped from a year ago, while perhaps true, is as fair as saying Babe Ruth slipped in 1929. When you establish a standard not seen in recent times, less than standard seems below par. The Steelers are 10th in the league in points allowed (18.4), and consider that many of those points came on two kick returns, two pick-sixes, a fluke punt-return strip and the aftermath of an on-side kick. The Steelers are so paranoid about kickoff returns, they settle for pooch kicks that give opponents the ball across the 40-yard line where the defense starts in the hole. Cleveland's lone scoring drive started close to the 50 after the Steelers refused to kickoff anymore. All that considered, 10th place in scoring defense is quite acceptable.
The Steelers' defense ranks second in rushing yards per game (76.6), 15th in passing yards (214.4) and eighth overall (291 yards per game). Those aren't bad at all, but not what the Nation is used to. The Nation is also not accustomed to the defense giving up back-to-back game winning drives by opponents (Chicago and Cincinnati). On one hand, you can say that Troy Polamalu's absence was the difference in those two losses. On the other hand, you can say that a single injury should never make that much of a difference. We've got to be better than that.
I really believe the Steelers' secondary is playing better that what 214 passing yards per game might indicate. With Pittsburgh leading early and often in every game, opponents have been forced to fire away. Quality quarterbacks such as Jay Cutler, Carson Palmer, Phillip Rivers and Brett Favre have been forced into urgency. Even Detroit and Cleveland, in catch-up situations, are capable of racking up some yardage. Considering what has been coming at them, Ike Taylor, William Gay and Ryan Clark have held their own relatively well, especially without Troy. I've seen a good many deep passes with those guys johnny-on-the-spot. Troy, of course, is special. He is like an exotic sports car. When finely tuned with all the parts working, his performance is a combination of beauty and precision. When a part or two is not quite up to snuff, he's in the shop.
Not surprising, Brett Kiesel, Casey Hampton, James Farrior and Lawrence Timmons have performed above-the-line against the run. We almost take that for granted. Aaron Smith's absence is going to hurt, but that is precisely why the Steelers drafted Ziggy Hood. A first-round selection, Hood can no longer hide in Mike Tomlin's oven. He'll rotate with veterans Nick Eason and Travis Kirschke, but if every other NFL team can throw their first rounders into the fray on a regular basis, why can't Pittsburgh? As they say in Ziggy's college state, Missouri, it's time to "show me" something.
The most glaring weakness of the Steelers' defense is their inability to get off the field. They are 24th in the league in allowing first downs (125) and 26th in allowing third-down conversions (43.3%). If you factor in the opponents cashing in on four of five fourth-down plays, the Steelers are among the bottom of the barrell, 28th, allowing third and fourth down conversions. Making matters worse, and this is only an empirical observation, it seems to me that many of those third and fourth downs came with long distances. They don't feel like one-yard cheapshots, but 8-10-12 yarders that make you scream. The fact that opponents have been in so many third-down situations indicates that the defense has been stingy on first and second downs. That's the good news. The conversion rate is the bad news, and clearly the difference between this season and last. Perhaps other teams have smartened up to the Steelers' mantra of refusing to allow the big play, so they reach success underneath. Should we tighten the screws a bit and sacrifice a little vulnerability to some splash? You know Defensive Coordinator Dick LeBeau is in the lab during this off week with concoctions brewing.
Another hole in the Steelers' defense, at least until the fourth quarter Sunday, was the minimal number of created turnovers and splash plays. The Steelers are in the middle of the pack with five interceptions and five fumble recoveries. It was great to see the defense rise up huge against the Vikings, and maybe we'll see more of that ahead. It was also good to see the sack total continue to climb. The Steelers are now tied for second with 21, mainly because Deebo is heating up.
Special teams took a step forward last season, and have gone two steps backward thus far this season. The ugly habit of allowing kickoff returns for touchdowns does more than hand over seven points, as if that's not enough. It also puts the team in a defensive mode, as mentioned earlier. Instead of aggresively attacking the return team, the Steelers are operating scared with high, short kicks and the result is ridiculous field position. One of the reasons (though not all) the defense has fallen from its lofty numbers is that special teams is not doing them any favors. This notion of "kicking scared" must come to an end.
The punting has been better since Daniel Sepulveda's return, but it also would have been better had Bobby Walden returned, and he's 71. Sepuveda isn't going to the Pro Bowl, but he is solidly in the top half of NFL punters with a 44.8 average and 40.9 net. He also has 10 punts inside the 20. That's all we ask. The return game is both good and poor. Stefan Logan is 6th in the league with a 25.3 kick-return average. You get the feeling he is going to pop one soon. The news is not so good with punt returns, where the Steelers have a milktoast 6.6 average, 22nd in the NFL. Missing two field goals cost us a ballgame, but I still contend Reed slipped on one of them after the rain destroyed a field that needed repair work. Then again, what's a guy from Pittsburgh doing talking about field conditions?
So here we sit at 5-2, equally as close to 7-0 as we could be 3-4. I like the idea of re-tooling and re-energizing with a bye week while our next opponent, Denver, gets beaten up in Baltimore, win or lose. Here we go Steelers, here we go. Keep the faith, brothers and sisters of the Nation.
9 recs |
65 comments
| Add comment
|
Comments
Two write ups in two days by MR
Christmas has come early at BTSC
by worldtrip on Oct 28, 2009 8:01 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Great read.
Thank you for your optimistic insight. rec’d
"I believe the game is designed to reward the ones who hit the hardest. If you can't take it, you shouldn't play." Jack Lambert
by LongTimeSteelersFan on Oct 28, 2009 8:40 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Well done!
Not only great analysis but the upbeat tone lifted my spirits during this boring off-week. I agree that the Steelers are much better than the pundits generally give them credit for. It’s good to be a bit behind the frontrunners just now. Let them overlook us.
by Citizen of Steeler Nation on Oct 28, 2009 9:26 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Nice work
Enjoyable read and many valid points.
When the home team has been to the mountaintop six times, there’s no doubt that championships tend to become expectations. But I don’t think too many Steeler fans expect perfection. What a lot of us do expect is consistent effort from the players, and coaching that at least is somewhat imaginative.
Whenever these qualities fall short, we’re gonna gripe—you can count on it.
by Billy52 on Oct 28, 2009 10:07 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Rec'd
Terrific write up, as always rose.
I would aegue that the line’s improvement would be #1 and Mendenhall and Wallace a close 2nd and 3rd on the pleasant surprises category. Props to the front office for making the effort of keeping the unit together. It’ll cost a lot to keep Colon next year if he does become a FA (CBA pending), but I am hoping they do. (This from someone who continually bashed him his first couple of seasons at RT).
On the not-so pleasant surprises I would put Lamar Woodley 1st. Eventhough last couple of games he has been getting good presure and disrupting things, he surely has looked like he’s lost a gear or lacks a different pass-rushing move than last year. He seems to be just a bit late to make the sack.
2nd not pleasant surprise I would put Limas. Just because of his training camp and his pre-season.
3rd would be Keiwan Ratliff. I thought he would be a solid-veteran dime back, in the mold of a Keyaron Fox signing last year: quiet and effective. He has been quiet and disastrous, in my opinion. In that same sentence I would have to put our 2 rookie CB’s, just because of the fact that they seem unable to beat Ratliff, or maybe it’s just a matter of not getting opportunities to showcase themselves.
All in all I think that the Steelers are in excellent position for the tough strech that comes after the bye.
Here we go…!
It all starts in the trenches.
by The_Nation_in_Mexico on Oct 29, 2009 12:25 AM EDT via mobile reply actions 0 recs
Awesome write-up!
I hope that as Troy shakes off the cobwebs of his injury, the D will tighten up, and we’ll have a Super Bowl Repeat in our sights. Fingers crossed, guys!
Let's win one for Adenhart #34
HERE WE GO STEELERS, HERE WE GO!!!!!
by moosemastr on Oct 29, 2009 2:42 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Delicious Pie and yucky milktoast
I just love me a food reference.
And yes it is a Damn Good Pie! I find it especially delicious. I havent seen our offense look this great since i dont know when. its exciting to watch the Steelers moreso now, and not just because they might screw something up (although we do that too).
Overall I think our two biggest weaknesses, as you well pointed out, are the 3rd and longs that have to get stopped. I cant recall before where I actually felt less confident about us stopping a 3rd and 7 over a 3rd and 13.
And the other thing that hurts is really that special teams in general. No blocking for Logan, and no coverage for kicks. We gotta get that stuff together.
But those things can get fixed. We have the personnel. Tomlin’s the man to do it.
This post got me excited. Thanks MR!
by Mechem on Oct 29, 2009 2:48 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
delish
This was my favorite part:
Perhaps other teams have smartened up to the Steelers’ mantra of refusing to allow the big play, so they reach success underneath. Should we tighten the screws a bit and sacrifice a little vulnerability to some splash? You know Defensive Coordinator Dick LeBeau is in the lab during this off week with concoctions brewing.
Golf clap. And I agree that might be great strategy.
Freel free to email me anytime at behindthesteelcurtain@gmail.com with questions, suggestions, complaints, etc, or to just say what's up. -Michael Bean (Blitz)
by Blitzburgh on Oct 29, 2009 3:01 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
maybe there has been a long pass given up this year but I can’t remember it. I think the DBs have proven they are up to the task and should be allowed to play a little tighter. This would have a snowball effect of more qb pressure and sacks as well as increased confidence overall and less screaming at the tv by me
by qwikdoc on Oct 29, 2009 2:22 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
By the numbers...
… we’ve given up 2 passes of 40+ yards. That ties us with 4 teams and behind 7 others. We’ve given up 17 passes of 20+ yards. Tied with 4 teams and behind 13. (Numbers from NFL.com)
I think it’s fair to say we’re above average, but not great.
by Varmint on Oct 30, 2009 11:39 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
"...they have only trailed in 15 of those minutes."
“The Steelers have played 424 minutes of football this season. Incredibly, they have only trailed in 15 of those minutes.”
Wow. I had no idea that the number was so small. Is this fact striking anyone else as amazing?
by Concomitandt on Oct 29, 2009 4:14 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Amazing stat! I’m one to ignore them unless they are wins/losses, especially with Big Ben, but this is great stuff. Go rose!
by Steeler Chick on Oct 29, 2009 11:00 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I would rather that those 15 mins came at the beginning of the game instead of the end though…
by SteelersfanATX on Oct 29, 2009 12:35 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
And the biggest lead any team has had has been 4 points.
Only Minnesota has lead by 4
the other leads were 3 points by Cin. and Chi. (unfortunatly at the end of the game).
I wasn’t pleased because we didn’t win - Mike Tomlin (after the 2009 week 2 loss to Chicago).
by fanofsteel on Oct 29, 2009 1:53 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
It would be amazing if none of the other winning teams had the same numbers. Wonder how the numbers look for Denver, Cincy, Indy, NO andothers?
by qwikdoc on Oct 29, 2009 2:37 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
great writing
This has got to be the best writing I have seen about our Stillers. Thanks rose!!
by autoworker123 on Oct 29, 2009 5:51 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Riddle me this…do you root for Baltimore or Denver?
I think I always have to go against the divisional rival, but if Denver doesn’t win their division they are going to have a whole hell of a lot of wins and be in contention for a wildcard.
Also of note while taking stock of the situation around our division, are the various tiebreaking scenarios. First and foremost, the steelers should win out, no problem, right? Every game is important, but looking ahead, since it’s the bye-week, the factors that play into each game and our playoff prospects:
@ DEN: Conference opponent, has beaten CIN
CIN: Currently most important game on schedule
@KC: Conference opponent, losing will make steelers laughing stock
@BAL:Divisional, could be in contention at this point, CIN beat them
OAK: Conference opponent
@CLE: Divisional, everyone beats them
GB: The only NFC game left on our schedule, but CIN beat them, need common games
BAL: Divisional, could be even more important than last years late-game
@MIA: Conference
Out of 8 games, 4 remaining are in our division. Out of 8 games, 7 are in our conference.
The bengals have 3 divisional games remaining. Out of 8 games, 2 are in their conference.
You sure Ike isn’t reacquainting himself with his fingers, he certainly doesn’t use them for catching. - Brian (DaBolts) on "Face Me Ike"
by steelguy99 on Oct 29, 2009 8:29 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Denver needs stopped to keep from getting a bye
Assuming we heat up, I don’t see anyone or anything stopping the Colts from a bye. It could come down to the Steelers/Patriots/Broncos or Bengals fighting for that number 2 bye week at the end.
"Damnit mom! You almost ran over Greg Lloyd!"
at an autograph signing back in 95. He walked out in front of our minivan, and my mom almost hit him. He apologized.
by PA ARMY OFFICER on Oct 29, 2009 11:04 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Undefeated teams
I think it’sd be pretty cool if we handed the Vikes and Donkeys their first loss, the Colts theirs in the AFCCG, and the Saints theirs in SB44.
Just sayin.
by PonchoBrew on Oct 29, 2009 12:44 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
math mistake here...
“The bengals have 3 divisional games remaining. Out of 8 games, 2 are in their conference.”
Must be more than 2 in conference. Maybe you mean 2 out of conference?
Interesting look ahead. Exciting to see so much implication when you put it this way. I’m not overly concerned about a bye week other than that means more home games potentially.
by Steely McSmash on Oct 29, 2009 12:57 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah, it was more an idiotic grammatical mistake than a mathematical one. 2 out of conference is correct.
You sure Ike isn’t reacquainting himself with his fingers, he certainly doesn’t use them for catching. - Brian (DaBolts) on "Face Me Ike"
by steelguy99 on Oct 29, 2009 2:37 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Also, I’m more concerned about making the playoffs than how things shake out in the playoffs, which is probably why I will be root-root-rooting for Denver. Also, if Denver beats baltimore and we can beat denver then that gives us two common games over, and a conference game over both teams.
Right now the bengals have us in head-to-head, division games, and conference games.
You sure Ike isn’t reacquainting himself with his fingers, he certainly doesn’t use them for catching. - Brian (DaBolts) on "Face Me Ike"
by steelguy99 on Oct 29, 2009 2:40 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
One small point to consider
I don’t want to have to play Denver in Denver in the playoffs. For one it probably means no Ryan Clark.
That being said, I don’t ever root for Baltimore (except in 2007 against the Pats*).
by Chicago Steeler on Oct 29, 2009 2:01 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
and look where that got you
The only managing Ben does is he manages to WIN games
by chewiesteeler on Oct 30, 2009 3:45 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Would like to see Ravens exploit the Broncos
Denver strikes me as playing above their talent level. They have a new coaching staff and a new QB. Once someone finds their weaknesses, the Broncos will not be an elite team. Win or lose, I’d like to see the Ravens poke some holes in Denver’s smug superiority.
by Steelin on Oct 29, 2009 2:40 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think that sounds good, with both teams getting dinged up in the process. But for the W column, I still like denver. As Chicago points out above though, playing Denver in Denver during the playoffs might suck, unless they perform the standard AFC west meltdown by that point.
You sure Ike isn’t reacquainting himself with his fingers, he certainly doesn’t use them for catching. - Brian (DaBolts) on "Face Me Ike"
by steelguy99 on Oct 29, 2009 2:41 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
State of Union
Impressive, rose! Love it. Excellent objective article. Can’t disagree with any of your points. Thanks for reminding Steeler Nation of our sometimes unreasonable expectations—we ALWAYS want a Super Bowl and have major problems accepting less! The Steelers set such a high standard, it’s sometimes difficult for them to live up to their own reputation. Still, I have high hopes for Seventh Heaven in February!
by Steeler Chick on Oct 29, 2009 10:59 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Great work MR...
Always on point, always interesting. Thank you.
'I’ve learned to become a flat-liner. There’s a lot out there that’ll make your heart jump if you allow it."
-Coach Tomlin
by NYSteelersFan4 on Oct 29, 2009 11:16 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
George Wrighster’s week 7 review! Big Ben and steelers get love!
http://tightend.blogspot.com/2009/10/week-7-blowouts.html
"Don't Be Afraid to Stand on a Pile of 'No's' for one 'Yes'"
http://tightend.blogspot.com
by curiousg87 on Oct 29, 2009 2:32 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Super post
Of the major problems (fumbling, giving up 3rd down conversions, kick coverage), the one that concerns me most is the 3rd down conversions.
by pghnorthside on Oct 29, 2009 2:34 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Kickoffs
I have never been a fan of the high, but short kickoff. It seems to occasionally give the deep returner a running start or to give great field position when caught by an ‘up’ receiver. I would rather see Reed use the deliberate squib kick that bounces erratically. It should go as far as the high, short kickoff, but could also lead to disruption of the return or fumbles.
by whogastim on Oct 29, 2009 2:36 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
you’re right. That would be preferrable since he can’t kick it to the goal line like all the other kickers.
by qwikdoc on Oct 29, 2009 2:39 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Bengals fan here
I never counted the Steelers out. They are the class of a tough division and my Bengals being where they at this point of the season is beyond my expectations. I hope was to improve enough to split with you and the Ravens and would have considered it a feather in our cap. Well surprisingly enough that is in the bag and now we are hoping for a split in the next two against you and the Ravens. Beating the Ravens at home is probably the greater possibility. Beating you at your house, even though we actually play well there is hard to expect. Frankly the Bengals sweeping the division is beyond even the most optimistic Bengal fan’s thoughts.
One advantage, though a small one, is that the Steelers and the Ravens have yet to play one another and either one of you will fall back two games or both of you will fall back one. Your games against Baltimore will greatly affect Cincy’s chances. Of your remaining schedule the Ravens for 2, Bengals,Broncos, Packers and Dolphins are probably the toughest. The Ravens have the Colts, Steelers for 2, Broncos, Bengals, Packers and Bears. For the Bengals it is the Ravens, Steelers Vikings, Chargers and Jets.
Though anyone can win on any given Sunday the Steelers should beat the Chiefs, Browns and Raiders as “easy wins”. The Ravens have the Browns, Lions and Raiders. The Bengals have the Raiders, Browns, Lions and Chiefs. The Vikings win was huge as the Ravens already lost to them and the Bengals hope Favre breaks down or something before we play them.
I have looked this over and my prediction is 12-4 for the Steelers, 11-5 for the Bengals and 10-6 for the Ravens. I don’t see 7 wins for us but I do think you guys can pull out 7. I just don’t think the Ravens can quite catch up. That is my realistic prediction at this time. The Colts will doom the Ravens hopes, the Vikings will doom the Bengals hopes and the Steelers eek out another one. It could very well come down to the wire and the hopes of all three teams could hinge on the last game of the season. I will give the Bengals one piece of hope. We are getting better every week and though the Steelers and Ravens will too the Bengals should improve more because we have more room to improve. What a 3 team race this could be. Fun huh?
" My enemy said "Love your enemy". I obeyed and loved myself." Gibran
by JUNGLEJOHN on Oct 29, 2009 4:04 PM EDT reply actions 1 recs
This is substantially more interesting than a “whodey” post.
You sure Ike isn’t reacquainting himself with his fingers, he certainly doesn’t use them for catching. - Brian (DaBolts) on "Face Me Ike"
by steelguy99 on Oct 30, 2009 8:08 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Steelguy99....
I am certainly not above a good who dey. But not until we finish. Even a hen doesn’t cackle until the egg is actually laid. Now in the unlikely event that we beat you in this next game… well.. you wouldn’t begrudge me a who dey or two then would you? Wouldn’t we have earned it? But since you are still the defending champs you won’t hear me cackling until we deserve it.
" My enemy said "Love your enemy". I obeyed and loved myself." Gibran
by JUNGLEJOHN on Oct 30, 2009 4:37 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
You have a fan who goes by the name of "whodey"
who comes on here and types “who dey” and nothing else. Leaves it on random postings, and was particularly active after the last steelers/bengals game. That is to whom steelguy is referring I do believe.
by worldtrip on Oct 30, 2009 5:41 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
My bad.
" My enemy said "Love your enemy". I obeyed and loved myself." Gibran
by JUNGLEJOHN on Nov 2, 2009 9:41 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Good Stuff, MR
I think Tomlin and LeBeau are spending a lot of time in the lab this week. Tomlin on special teams and LeBeau on his third down D.
The reason why Troy is missed so much was on display for the Vikings. He stopped two touchdown this past week, one by catching Rice at the goal line and the other by forcing Peterson out of bounds when he broke loose on a run from scrimmage. If that was Ty Carter or Mundy back there, those would have been 14 points.
Man, how sick would our pass D be if you could clone Troy 4 times and just let him be your starting secondary?
And then clone Deebo and let 4 of him be your LB’s in the 3-4? I guarantee you the standard of expectation for our D would be upheld with those moves.
by datruth4life on Oct 29, 2009 4:13 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Against the browns he made a great sideline-to-sideline play off of the wildcat that also stopped a touchdown.
You sure Ike isn’t reacquainting himself with his fingers, he certainly doesn’t use them for catching. - Brian (DaBolts) on "Face Me Ike"
by steelguy99 on Oct 30, 2009 8:09 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Thanks for spoiling all the fun
One of the most exciting things about being a Steelers fan is that the defense is so much fun to talk about and by fun I mean getting cranky that it isn’t absolutely dominating in every stage.
Also, you ruin the fun of bashing Arians? Sheesh.
(I should add that I was never too down on BA, my main complaint was the FGs on 4th and goal last year. We haven’t been taking those this year.)
Great job as always.
by 13thieves on Oct 29, 2009 5:24 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Nice Optimism
I agree with most of your writing… but take exception on a couple of points…
First, I think our defense is getting a bad wrap. Some of it from me, I’ll admit. But the point about us leading in the games needs to be emphasized. Last year, we were coming from behind. In those games, our defense was playing “stop the run.” We know we can do that. Especially when we know that is what they are trying to do.
What we can’t stop — what we have never stopped — is the quick out pass. It seems like our strategy there has always been play it loose, but solid. Give them 4 or 5, but make them throw it enough times that eventually they miss. This puts them behind down and distance, and now — as they drop back to throw it down the field — our exotic blitzes have enough time to get to them.
Last year, we never had to worry about an offense that was just throwing it. This year, we have. So the comparison is skewed.
I also question that we have the best trio of wide receivers in the NFL this season. Come on. Really? I can name four or five teams that have three wide-outs as good or better than ours — starting with Arizona.
I love Hines. I am thrilled he is having a good year. But I don’t hear anyone saying: “Well, first thing you have to do is gameplan for Hines Ward…” And Santonio has not been playing like a Super Bowl MVP. Sorry, he isn’t. Maybe teams are doubling him and taking him away, but he has not been the game breaker he was in last year’s playoffs and super bowl. Wallace has been a delightful surprise. But he is not even the best rookie Wide Receiver — let alone in the top three of NFL receivers. Our receivers are doing well. But, let’s not get too carried away…
About Mendenhall… I am still not sure what to make of him. Yes, he had some good games — notable against two of the worst rushing defenses in the NFL. He didn’t break 100 against the Vikings. (Yeah, I know, that’s because BA didn’t run him enough — but BA wasn’t the guy who couldn’t count to 100 and jumped over the 5 yard line, fumbled, and got himself benched…)
Can we please wait until he gets 100 yards against a team that is actually good before we anoint him as the next Bettis?
As for Ben, I think he has it in him to play a lot better. He needs to stop throwing pick sixes or we might be in a world of trouble when we play good teams. And, right now, I don’t think he is in the Pro Bowl. Tell me, who are you going to leave off of the team? Brady or Manning?
I’m not trying to say we suck. But we still have only beat one good team. We are still a game back in our division (by nature of the tie-breaker).
The defense is showing signs of being itself now that Troy is back. The Offensive Line is a LOT better than I thought it would be.
But I am not popping a champagne cork over here. We have a tough four games coming up (Well, except for KC) We need to win the next four in a row to make the playoffs.
Yes, we can do that. I think we WILL do that. But winning 4 in a row is never easy…
by MarkJoel66 on Oct 29, 2009 5:53 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
wow
we need to win the next four to make the playoffs? I absolutely do not know about that. We need to win 2 or 3 of the next four.
The four game stretch we need to win is Oakland – Baltimore.
The one game we can’t afford to lose in the next four is against Cincy at home. Which I don’t think will happen.
Freel free to email me anytime at behindthesteelcurtain@gmail.com with questions, suggestions, complaints, etc, or to just say what's up. -Michael Bean (Blitz)
by Blitzburgh on Oct 29, 2009 8:12 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
You looking at the same schedule I am?
11/9 Denver
11/15 Cincinnati
11/22 Kansas City
11/29 Baltimore
Who do you think we can aford to lose to? If Baltimore loses this week, then MAYBE they are far enough behind that we can stop worrying about them… but I am not counting them out yet. We HAVE to beat Cincy, I think we agree there.
And speaking of Cincy, they have 2 hard games coming up, and 2 patsies. We have three hard games.
If you drop any of these games, you will, in all probability fall 2 games behind Cincinnati. Which game do you think we can lose? If we lose to Baltimore, Cincy has a better division record. If we lose to Cincy, then they have a huge advantage on us, and frankly we either have to hope for a Cincy collapse or a wild card.
If you lose to the Broncos, then we end up — at best — playing the AFC championship game there (with no Ryan Clark).
I GUESS you could say that you could drop the game against KC, and if Cincy drops one you’d be OK… but would any of us be OK with losing to KC?
I’m telling you, Pittsburgh has to win the next 4 games, or else the fate of the playoffs is out of their hands. They’ll have to start hoping that other teams lose as much as they are winning — and that is no way to defend a title…
by MarkJoel66 on Oct 30, 2009 12:40 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
They absolutely do not “have to” win the next 4 games. It sure would be nice, but as long as they handle the division they can make the playoffs. The chiefs and denver are both games we can lose with a fairly minor amount of fallout. Even if we’re fighting for a wildcard spot the steelers can still close out the season if after 4 weeks they are 7-4.
At that point there are 5 games left. 10-6 could very well not make the playoffs, 11-5 probably will. If you really want to use “have to’s”, then the steelers “have to” win 4 games in a row when they are at 7-5.
I’d love the steelers to be 9-2 after the baltimore game. Saying that the steelers can only make the playoffs if they are 9-2 and not 8-3 is silly.
You sure Ike isn’t reacquainting himself with his fingers, he certainly doesn’t use them for catching. - Brian (DaBolts) on "Face Me Ike"
by steelguy99 on Oct 30, 2009 8:18 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Well
Ultimately, they need to be 11-5 or 12-4.
My point is that if we turn into 8-3, things quickly fall out of our hands. Now you have to count on a Cincy meltdown.
The 2005 Steelers managed to win, even though they put their fate in other team’s hands. But it isn’t a recipe for success.
I am very sure that Mike T is not thinking that we can lose to Denver and not have it affect us…
by MarkJoel66 on Oct 30, 2009 1:55 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Nice MR
I think the best summarizing statement that can be made is that is that we are extremely well positioned to make a run for the playoffs in the second half of the season. The media loves to make a lot of noise about who is undefeated, but who wants to bet that anyone will be perfect throught the regular season. It’s just something to do until the very serious business of the playoffs begin.
There are only two important issues here; can we make the playoffs? Not guaranteed but I like our situation. Its doable. Are we physically intact and ‘hot’ going into the playoffs? Won’t know the answer to that definitively for another couple of months quite frankly. But I have a great deal of faith that the organization understands the problem and is game planning the solution as we speak.
by RickVa on Oct 29, 2009 8:25 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
The key for the Bengals
will be confidence. This will be true of the Ravens too since few are left from the squad that won the SB earlier in the decade. That is Pittsburgh biggest advantage, a genuine distaste for losing and all that comes with it. Coach Lewis has done an exceptional job of bringing this team back and they are certainly capable of winning the division. On the other hand, any loss of focus or panic and they won’t even make the playoffs.
It is not enough to have the talent necessary to win. At some point teams have to learn how to finish. For example, watched film of the ‘05 playoff game (Steelers/Bengals) and noticed how Bengals players would linger on a bad officials’ call. Hey, an official’s mistake is always a possibility in football. But to let it distract you to the point that you lose concentration or heart is your problem. Cincy will have to overcome those sort of issues to get over the top.
by RickVa on Oct 30, 2009 2:06 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
This maybe a goo time to ask....
What is your feeling about the Bengals….objectively…try to take your Steeler fan hat off for just a moment. I think we are much improved but played a little too inconsistent. Many say we were lucky. I am not sure I believe in luck on the football field. Some say the Broncos were lucky with the “immaculate deflection”. Not me, as that takes away credit for Stokley who made a heads up play. The loss to the Texans was due to a lack of execution. The plays to beat them were there. Balls were dropped or fumbled away. They beat us – simple as that.
I think our D has stepped up to the pretty good level from the bad level and while we are not to the Steelers level yet we are closer. On the O, well Carson didn’t really have a preseason. He is finally looking like the Carson we knew he had the ability to be. I realize that the Bears didn’t look too good on D but they really aren’t a bad team and I think Carson had a lot to do with how bad they looked. Honestly I think we are better than the last time we played you and with Troy being back it looks like you guys are too. I am really looking forward to our next game. Honestly, I think you will beat us but playing a team like the Steelers, win or lose, will help us as a team know what it takes to get to the top level. Sure I want the win – but I would be a surprise if we did. I really don’t know just how good we are or can be. It could go either way I guess. They are the Bengals after all. But….we aren’t the Bungles anymore.
" My enemy said "Love your enemy". I obeyed and loved myself." Gibran
by JUNGLEJOHN on Oct 30, 2009 9:09 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I had the Bengals contending for this division in August...
But I think the one thing that their playoff hopes hinges on is pass rush. Losing Odom hurts, because he was playing really well, despite a slight skewing of stats with a five sack day and three zero sack games prior to injury. I don’t really have to tell you how imprtant pass rush is, you saw your last season firsthand. The offense is really starting to click, with CP finding his three go to’s at receiver (Chad Johnson, Andre Caldwell, and Coles finally making some plays in there too. Add a healthy Henry to the mix and you have a potent attack) Cedric Benson looks absolutely great this year, and that balance on offense can’t be overlooked when talking about team success. Barring any major setbacks, this team should be in it fighting until the end (when they fall just short of the playoffs because of a great Steeler run at the end of the season… you had to know how I’d end it, right?) The only thing I’d worry about is falling into a two or three game skid and losing Chad Johson’s interest. Even though he is wearing the team player hat so far this year, his track record can’t be forgotten.
'I’ve learned to become a flat-liner. There’s a lot out there that’ll make your heart jump if you allow it."
-Coach Tomlin
by NYSteelersFan4 on Oct 30, 2009 9:26 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
you're a difficult opponent
last year you had a lot of injuries to key players so it’s a completely different team on offense. but overall, it seems you have a decent defense now and i think that’s where you really improved from past years.
by t1mmy10 on Nov 1, 2009 2:30 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Time to stack some wins, BABY!
Just like our coach, the standard of expectation doesn’t change for Steelers Nation, either.
by datruth4life on Oct 30, 2009 12:08 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I think Troy is great
He is the defensive player of the decade if you ask me. One hell of a man, Don’t get me wrong but do these Head and Shoulders commercials kind of make you squirm in your seat a little? He is man enough to do it I guess but it just seems a little … well … lets just say not too masculine. Kinda like I felt when Carson did the commercial eating a hotdog. I have no idea if Troy is gay or not and I wouldn’t care if he is but….these commercials …. well… enough said. I am not trying to be a troll. That is not my style. But I am just a bit curious. Maybe I am the one with the problem – I would be the last one to know.
" My enemy said "Love your enemy". I obeyed and loved myself." Gibran
by JUNGLEJOHN on Oct 30, 2009 4:44 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Not gay...
Married, kids to boot. He’s very soft spoken, that voice is not one you’d hear and think, “Hey that’s a professional football player.”
'I’ve learned to become a flat-liner. There’s a lot out there that’ll make your heart jump if you allow it."
-Coach Tomlin
by NYSteelersFan4 on Oct 30, 2009 5:12 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
but Head and Shoulders does 6 great things for his hair
"Polamalu’s lineage can be traced through several roots. Chuck Norris mated with an Amazon Queen, and on the other side, Tony Hawk mated with Mother Nature. The two children of these spawned and fused in a tantric love session to create Troy Polamalu. The mother however died as he tore through the birth canal with a spin move."
Mechem on the roots of Troy Polamalu
by WVPiratesfan on Oct 30, 2009 5:29 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
the commercials are as good as they may get for troy
watching him i get the sense that hes not too comfortable behind the camera. Take away the hair and I dont know what other commercial he could make. I think he’s leveraging his assets as it were. Doesn’t he get fined in every game for obscuring his name with the hair anyway?
by SteelersVT on Nov 1, 2009 1:36 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Don't get me wrong
I have a lot of respect for him and I don’t begrudge him making money doing these ads. The more I think about it you would need to be one hell of a man to do them and not care if the gave a wrong impression to some. My wife brought me a pink shirt. I wear it and when guys teased me about it I looked them in the eye and told them I could wear a pink dress and be more manly than them. I guess it also applies here.
" My enemy said "Love your enemy". I obeyed and loved myself." Gibran
by JUNGLEJOHN on Nov 2, 2009 9:40 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
very nice post
i liked the look at what is going good and what isn’t
by t1mmy10 on Nov 1, 2009 2:27 PM EST reply actions 0 recs

by 




















