Steelers by Offensive Set '09 Game 3
by swissvale72 on Oct 5, 2009 9:34 PM EDT
Email
Print
| STEELERS BY OFFENSIVE SET '09, GAME 3 | ||||||||
| SET | #Plays | Rushing | Passing | Int | Sack | |||
| 3 or More Wides | 29 | 3-13yds | 17/25-216 | 1 | 1 | |||
| 2Tight/2Wide | 9 | 7-47yd | 2/3-27yd | |||||
| 2Tight/FB | 6 | 6-17yd | ||||||
| 2Wide/Tight/FB | 8 | 5-14yd | 3/3-28yd | |||||
| 3Tight/FB | 7 | 7-11yd | ||||||
| TOTAL | 58 | 28-102yds | 22/31-271 | 1 | 1 | |||
*Does not Include Plays Negated by Penalty
*Ramon Foster in for 10 plays, all as tight end
*Wallace played only 44% of snaps after playing
69% & 61% in first two games
*Spaeth played 46% of snaps after playing 27%
& 29% in first two games
*Ran 3 Wides 8 plays consecutive going into half,
so 3 WR figures are skewed by hurry-up situations
*Apologies for lateness, data just available this
morning, may enter performance by offensive set
later,might not
10 comments
|
2 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Great detail
Thanks Swiss, that is pretty in depth. Good to see Foster in the game, if only to show BA is being more creative.
Pie & Stats...
Vinnie’s Pie…just at Vinnie’s the night after the opener. Took my mother there for her 89th birthday. We’re classy like that. Sat in the bar…they’ve taken down the plastic grape decor….was awesome.
Stats….I glean the sets either from watching the game tape (what I did for the Chicago info, or looking at the “player participation” data on www.profootballfocus.com, then cross reference with the play by play (I use the espn site for that)
foster
oh….and foster was in so much largely, though not entirely, due to the D.J. Johnson injury
Vincent's..
Sorry…this “reply” thing only works about half the time for me….
5020…
Vincent’s of Greentree is NOT the same Vincent’s. In fact, Vince sued this fraud a few years ago for co-opting his name. Problem was Vince hadn’t copyrighted it, or some such BS
With FB: 21 plays, 18 rushes, 41 yards (2.3ypc)
Without FB: 38 plays, 10 rushes, 60 yards (6.0ypc)
Apparently, when we line up with a fullback, the defense is stacking up against the run and stuffing it. According to this data, our most effective formation for both running and passing is 2TE/2WR. Thanks, Swiss! It would be nice to see summary totals from the first four games, when you have them. Then we can really see if this is a trend or a one-game thing.
interesting stat
but unless we know how many of the carries with fullback are in short yardage, (where 1-2 yards is a win on the play) it’s hard to say whether we’re really that much more effective without a FB. situational football…
Swiss
You are correct sir, the only true Vinnie’s is on Ardmore Blvd. I’d take one of his pizza’s over steak & lobster. Happy Birthday to your mom. I just wish they had decent pizza in California, but after Vincent’s, nothing else comes close. I should move back to the ‘Burgh just for the pie and Primanti’s.
Game 2
…thought this was posted here before. I have Game 1 somewhere, hopefully will have Game 4 and cumulative tomorrow. Right, acrollet….I’ve not analyzed that closely, but I think by no means is the fullback used only in short yardage, but perhaps moreso than the other sets.
STEELERS BY OFFENSIVE SET ’09: GAME 2
SET #Plays Rushing Passing Int Sack
3 or More Wides 39 11-79yds 18/26-185 1 2
2Tight/2Wide 7 3-3yds 2/4-24 yds
2Tight/FB 6 4-14yds 1/2-3 yds
2Wide/Tight/FB 5 4-9yds 1/1-9yds
3Tight/FB 1 1/1-1yd
TOTAL 58 22-105yds 23/35-221 1 2
“Bunch
3wides 7 3-3yds 3/4-41yds
2tights 4 3-3yds 1/1-15yds
Total 11 6-6yds 4/5-56yds
Comments For This Post Are Closed
Secondary Sidebar
User Tools
"Thoughtful discussion with a sense of history."
Art Rooney Jr.
"Level-headed thinking." Pittsburgh Post-Gazette
FanPosts
Community blog posts and discussion.
Certain photos copyright © 2012 by Associated Press or Getty Images. Any commercial use or distribution without the express written consent of Associated Press and Getty Images is strictly prohibited.
