Steelers Stats At The Midway Mark
Just for fun, let's prorate some of the individual offensive statistics of the Pittsburgh Steelers now that we're exactly half way through the 2009 NFL season. We'll do the same for the defense afterwards.
Santonio Holmes: 36 receptions, 590 yards, 16.4 yards per reception, 73.8 yards per game, 1 TD, 58% catch rate
- On Pace For: 72 receptions, 1,180 yards, 2 TDs
Hines Ward: 49 receptions, 646 yards, 13.2 yards per reception, 80.8 yards/game, 4 TDs, 77% catch rate
- On Pace For: 98 receptions, 1,292 yards, 8 TDs
Mike Wallace: 25 receptions, 427 yards, 17.5 yards per reception, 54.6 yards/game, 3 TDs, 61% catch rate
- On Pace For: 50 receptions, 854 yards, 6 TDs
Heath Miller: 43 receptions, 371 yards, 8.6 yards per reception, 46.4 yards/game, 4 TDs, 86% catch rate
- On Pace For: 86 receptions, 741 yards, 8 TDs
Rashard Mendenhall: 100 attempts, 573 yards, 5.7 yards per attempt,. 4 TDs, 9 receptions, 78 yards, 8.7 yards per reception, 2 Fumbles
- On Pace For: 200 attempts, 1,146 yards, 8 TDs, 18 recetions, 156 yards, 4 Fumbles
Ben Roethlisberger: 185 - 262 (70.6%), 2295 yards, 14 TDs, 7 INTs, 104.1 QB Rating
- On Pace For: 4,590 yards, 28 TDs, 14 INTs
1 recs |
33 comments
| Add comment
|
Comments
Beastly
And people still try to say we only win by luck.
If they could just pull the trigger at the right time and not get costly turnovers, we would be alright. Against Denver I remember the fumble came just as we were beginning to establish a rhythm on offense, and the interception was in the endzone, on what was an obvious running situation. What really stands out to me though, isn’t that we had the two costly turnovers. It was Ben on the sideline rallying the troops after each one, and then marching down the field and regaining the momentum. That is proof that he is a leader of men.
But I’m being picky in my criticism. This is an elite offense and now that the line is playing the way Ben always told everyone they could (in no small part to his leadership, belief in the unit, and friendship of said unit). I think they are only just beginning to open up as well. They stuttered against Chicago and Minnesota somewhat, but really got a swagger going after Denver.
Bring on the Bengals. I am SO ready for Sunday.
Ryan Clark remarked that Coach Tomlin once asked whether he wanted to be the nail in the defense, or the hammer. "I said, 'I want to be the hammer coach.'"
by svenhoek on Nov 12, 2009 7:02 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
An offense that is the equal of its defense
I understand folks getting nostalgic for the old Steeler offense, but this doesn’t reflect the weapons available. Nobody would seriously suggest running the ball over fifty percent of the time if you had a Peyton Manning, Tom Brady, Dan Marino or John Unitas or any other high end franchise QB. And that’s exactly what we have in Ben. Sure, there may be a scenario where we could let Rashard and FWP run the ball down a team’s throat while Hines, Heath, Ton and Mike sit around twiddling their thumbs, but why would you want to do that?
This is an offense that when it fully matures will be able to consistently create unbearable stress on most defenses. In fact, this year the only reliable way of stopping it has been through its own mistakes; fumbles, interceptions, dropped balls and blown assignments.
Ditto on bringing on the Bengals. Cincy is good but they are going to have to depend upon Pittsburgh mistakes in order to win. The offense and defense is rounding into form. I honestly think we might witness something special on Sunday.
by RickVa on Nov 12, 2009 7:33 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Potential becoming reality
These projected stats definetly reflect what could very well become one of the best offensive statistic-season in Steelers annals.
Having been watching other games not involving the black & gold, one can appreciate the incredible talent level that the steelers field at the skill positions and in the coaching staff who have been consistently putting guys in situations where they have had success. There are teams in the league that don’t even come close to having the production that we are getting from everybody on offense, and whose offensive coaching staff is questionable at best.
I, for one, am pretty excited for what the second half of the season and the run to the playoffs will be like, specially since I will be able to go up to the BAL game at Heinz.
One of the things that was clear from the MSP Steelers preview Blitz et. al wrote was that this team had the potential to play much better on offense, and that has slowly been taking lace before our eyes, beginning to peak at the right time of the year.
Can’t wait for the big sunday show-down.
It all starts in the trenches.
by The_Nation_in_Mexico on Nov 12, 2009 8:03 PM EST via mobile reply actions 0 recs
My predictions are coming TRUE...
After the first 2 games I made a few predictions that people scoffed at…
That Ben would throw for 4000+ yards
That holmes would have 1000 yard season
that Ward would have a 1000 season
that RB would have a 1000 season(albeit parker-who knew he’d still be this injured)
that the offensive line would be excellent in pass pro and that 50% of sacks would be attributed to BB
That Polamalu would have more than a pick every two games(statistically) and level with 8 at the end of the season.
That the steelers and saints would play in the superbowl
If I would take something back it was that the giants would appear in the NFC championship game…I’d put the vikings instead.
I feel pretty good about my predictions. I got a G on this :-)
by surag238 on Nov 12, 2009 8:25 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
you got a thousand on what
Saints Steelers?
Freel free to email me anytime at behindthesteelcurtain@gmail.com with questions, suggestions, complaints, etc, or to just say what's up. -Michael Bean (Blitz)
by Blitzburgh on Nov 12, 2009 8:31 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
yep
but actually its a 100 dollars in a 10 people pool. winner walks away with the most accurate play off predictions prior to start of season. only one change is allowed to be made within the half way mark and it has to coincide with the overall playoff picture you create. so most accurate predictor wins-this includes regular season as well.
by surag238 on Nov 13, 2009 12:26 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Hines Ward: 49 receptions, 646 yards, 13.2 yards per reception, 80.8 yards/game, 4 TDs, 77% catch rate
On Pace For: 98 receptions, 1,292 yards, 8 TDs, 54.6 yards/game, 3 TDs,
isn’t something wrong with this mathematics?
by Bonek on Nov 12, 2009 8:56 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
fixed thanks
Just had Wallace’s numbers up there for some reason in the ‘on pace for’ section of Hines.
Freel free to email me anytime at behindthesteelcurtain@gmail.com with questions, suggestions, complaints, etc, or to just say what's up. -Michael Bean (Blitz)
by Blitzburgh on Nov 12, 2009 10:17 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Mendenhall has only started 5 games
if you look only at his starts, Mendenhall has:
5 starts, 93 carries for 528 yards (5.7 y/c, 106 yards/game) w/ 4 TDs
If you assume he starts every game going forward, and project those numbers, he should have the following over the next 8 games:
148 carries for 845 yards w 10 TDs
add those to his current numbers, and you have:
248 carries for 1318 yards with 14 TDs
I think I have the math right there….
by acrollet on Nov 12, 2009 10:19 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
more info
his starts have come against SD, DET, CLE, MIN, and DEN – interestingly enough, his yards per carry are highest against Minnesota and Denver, so it’s not like he’s even padded his stats against the basement of the league… His numbers are looking seriously beastly!
by acrollet on Nov 12, 2009 10:22 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
More Football outsiders
I like the O-Line stats, we’re now 11th in line yards, which is a huge move up. They run heavily in the middle of the line and off right tackle, which I think we all know.
Cincinnati is ranked 17th, and has a greater spread of where they run, they really mix it up.
Also Run defense stats we are #1 in Line and RB yards, but an interesting situation arises in the numbers: We are 5th in the percentage of run plays stuffed, at 24%, but power success against us (picking up a first down or TD in short yardage) is at 71%, putting us 22nd in the league. Power success is only run plays.
The Power stat might be suffering from a lag in our improvement, since third and 2 is a bit rarer now, so it will be interesting to watch short yardage plays from now on.
Cincy’s run defense is rated solidly, but they aren’t great at stuffs or power defense, so I think it is a flowing to the ball defense more than a jam the line defense. That didn’t work so well in Denver’s favor, but we’ll see how Cincy does. Cincy also gives up the third least amount of runs over 10 yards. This game is a good test for Mendenhall, because if Cincy’s Defense is represented by their stats he will get short runs but will not get many long ones, which means more carries and more importance on ball control.
One last thing The breakdown of line yards per direction for our defense is interesting, up the middle and off guard we are the 3rd best on line yards. Kudos Casey Hampton, you’ll get your money somewhere.
Off the ends we are 7th (left) and 4th (right), our pursuit and stretching the play is as good as it ever was, also welcome back Troy.
Off Tackle on either side we are 10th (on average 1/2 yard more than up the middle), so while that is still a great number for Ziggy and Eason, they still aren’t Aaron Smith. It’s good to see that teams can’t exploit them with much greater success though.
As for Ben, what a job he is doing. I’ll take that completion percentage and sack numbers over smartly throwing the ball away. It makes the O-line and receivers work harder through the play knowing Ben will hold that ball till they get open or he gets hit. I love it.
by Phantaskippy on Nov 13, 2009 2:01 AM EST reply actions 1 recs
Wow
These numbers are simply outstanding!!
Do ou guys know if any team has ever had 3 receivers over the 1000 yrd mark before?
Ron Paul was Right.
by Steelchamps !! on Nov 13, 2009 4:22 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
cards did last year
I’m sure others must have done it, but I remember that stat from the pre-SB43 hype.
by phxsteeler on Nov 13, 2009 8:23 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Colts...
…few years ago as well.
by Marvin, The Paranoid Android on Nov 13, 2009 9:21 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
.. thx fellas
Ron Paul was Right.
by Steelchamps !! on Nov 13, 2009 3:10 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
And yet, we ...
read that we’re winning on a wing and a prayer. It’s amazing the different perspectives of reading cold hard statistics and emotionally watching the plays unfold.
by tenthmtnman on Nov 13, 2009 8:30 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
don't forget...
Limas Sweed – 1 reception, 5 yards, 5 yards per reception, .625 yards/game, 3% catch rate
On Pace For: 2 receptions, 10 yards
by 36chambers on Nov 13, 2009 9:00 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
On Ben's season (and his status as an "elite" quarterback):
His numbers are fantastic (especially the completion %!), and yet still we listen to national commentators wonder if he’s among the NFL’s elite QBs. Just this week, prior to the Sunday night game, NBC had a discussion about whether he’s an “elite” quarterback, with more than one of the commentators (can’t remember which ones now) excluding him for the same usual b.s. — he holds the ball too long, he throws too many picks, blah blah blah. Then, on Tuesday on ESPN’s “Mike and Mike” in the morning, there was a discussion about whether Drew Brees should “join the big two of Brady and Manning” as the league’s elite QBs. When Roethlisberger was brought up, the comment was “he’s great, he’s just not that type of quarterback.”
So what type of quarterback is he? Well, this season, he’s 1st in the league in completion %, 4th in passer rating and 4th in yards passing. Not too bad. Beyond that, he’s the youngest QB to ever win a Super Bowl; he’s 8-2 in the playoffs for his career; he’s the winningest QB in his first five (and soon to be six) years in league history; he’s the architect of more comeback wins in the NFL over that time than any other QB, including the greatest Super Bowl winning drive of all-time; and he’s the cornerstone of the premier franchise in the NFL. That’s f**cking elite.
I try not to get too caught up in media pundits. I’ll take Lombardis over their hollow accolades any day. As Steeler fans, we know what Ben Roethlisberger is and where he ranks among NFL QB’s. Sometimes I just wish others could see it, too…
by cliff harris is still a punk! on Nov 13, 2009 10:41 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
Media praise is the wicked spell of the vision stealer
“We don’t subscribe to that hocus pocus.”
"A pessimist sees the difficulty in every opportunity; an optimist sees the opportunity in every difficulty." - Winston Churchill
by PixburghArn on Nov 13, 2009 10:49 AM EST up reply actions 1 recs
Not that type of Quarterback. . .
Yes, what they mean here is leave him off your fantasy roster, unless your league gives you points for Playoff wins, 4th Quarter comebacks, or creating great plays out of thin air while any of those listed above him would have been on their butt.
Ben is an old school QB, he’ll take a sack and get the yards back on a play where he should have been sacked. He’ll throw a pick, or fumble and then drive right back down the field for a TD. He’s no Manning or Brees, he wins Super Bowls.
Tom Brady is the king of QB’s right now because he wins close games, is phenomenal (historically) on drives to take the lead, and puts up fantasy numbers with Randy Moss.
The funny thing is he hasn’t won since they became a big offensive juggernaut. I know Ben won two Super Bowls with a great defense, but what QB has won a Super Bowl with an average defense?
by Phantaskippy on Nov 14, 2009 3:25 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
That average defense. . .
4th in points
6th in total yards
20th in passing yards
7th in passing TD’s
2nd in interceptions
1st in run defense
1st in rushing TD’s
+5 turnover ratio for the team. (31 TO’s, 36 forced)
That’s not an average defense in my book. Especially when you consider the number of possessions the other teams got each game.
by Phantaskippy on Nov 14, 2009 1:27 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Miller
Ben tried to stretch the middle of the field with Heath on Monday, and the ball was high, went through the tips of his fingers…I couldn’t believe it. I certainly won’t credit Heath with a “drop”, but the ball hit his hands and he didn’t catch it. I’m not sure I’ve ever seen that before.
breathe in deep feel your heart beat, just to know that life's worth livin'. feel your feet on the earth, better love it while it's still here spinnin'.
by NoCal-SteelCity on Nov 13, 2009 11:28 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
what was the point of this?
I mean what made you want to post this? jw.
by surag238 on Nov 13, 2009 12:29 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Just Wondering
What is Limas Sweed’s drop rate, I mean catch rate? Could you figure that out however you did the others?
by Bleed-Black&Gold on Nov 13, 2009 12:10 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
He isn’t on the Football outsiders list, probably hasn’t been targeted enough or something.
The worst receiver on their list? Darius Heyward-Bey, -110 dyar. (that’s defense adjusted yards above replacement), Wallace comes in at +149. Bey’s catch rate: 19%. It gets harder to hate the Raiders more every year.
by Phantaskippy on Nov 14, 2009 4:03 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs



















