Fixing the Steelers' kickoff coverage problems - an unorthodox solution
Olé!
This will be a numbers-heavy post, so please bear with me, folks. So far this season, the Steelers have kicked off to the opposition 44 times. We all know that 3 of those have gone for touchdowns, one of which was arguably the deciding factor in yesterday's contest. What I didn't know until I compiled the numbers this evening is that over those 44 kickoffs, the average starting position for the other team is their 33.36 yard line - almost 15 more yards than a touchback. (counting a TD as a return to the PIT 0 yard line) Obviously, something has to be done to fix the problem - not just the touchdowns, but all the free yards opponents are getting.
So, what can be done? A touchback is the safest way to handle a conventional kick-off, but the Steelers are extremely unlikely to switch kickers mid-season. There was an important keyword in the last sentence - conventional. I believe that the perfect storm exists for a radical shift in tactics. According to this post from the excellent Advanced NFL Stats blog, the recovery rate for unexpected onside kicks is around 60%. Given that the other team is already taking it back to around the 33-34 yard line, why not spot them 25 or so yards for a good chance at getting the ball right back? The Steelers' excellent defense is already built around keeping things in front of them, giving up the dink and dunk, and stiffening in the red zone - following this tactic would keep the defense off the field longer, and therefore keep them fresh to unleash whatever mayhem LeBeau has schemed up.
Of course, the major problem with this theory is that the recovery rate falls dramatically when an on-side kick is expected - to 20% or so. As soon as the Steelers became known for kicking onsides, the opposition would stick their "hands" team out for every kick-off, and so much for that strategy, right? However, this isn't a bad thing either - if the hands team is in, presumably the good blockers that are helping spring long returns are out, and it's safer to kick deep. The choice of how to kick can even be situational, depending on what personnel the other team is fielding. In addition, time spent by the other team practicing recovering onside kicks is time they haven't spent on the rest of their game-plan.
I'm not saying that this would be great for every team and situation - a team with a great kickoff coverage unit, a monster kicker (or kickoff specialist) and a weak defense would be ill-advised to follow this plan. However, I do think that kicking onsides anywhere from once to several times a game could have a salutary effect on our chances of winning. What do you think?
0 recs |
26 comments
| Add comment
|
Comments
That’s crazy enough to work. Almost!
I wonder if the Robopunter could become the Robokickoff specialist.
by BluegrassSteeler on Nov 16, 2009 10:51 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Well they could just keep in their lanes and tackle the damn returner.
by MEP12 on Nov 17, 2009 12:28 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
True, i was thinking about whether or not Sepulvada could kickoff deeper than Reed
by BluegrassSteeler on Nov 17, 2009 1:34 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
that would be nice
but even when they do make the tackle, Reed’s short kickoffs are giving away free yards…
by acrollet on Nov 17, 2009 8:22 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
robokickoffs
I’m pretty sure that Berger kicked off at least once last year, so I have to think that if Robopunter could kick off any better than Reed, they would have tried it…
by acrollet on Nov 17, 2009 8:21 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
(re)Sign Berger!
Wall of Shame
"I’m glad we play Pitt twice, and not Tenn this year." - Brownie's Year
"BB is ok (slightly overated)…but he is NO Kyle Orton! I’ll take Kyle over Ben any day" - Bronco_Fan_Tom
by Johnny_S on Nov 17, 2009 2:55 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I'm sick of it...
I went to the game on Sunday, and I cringed with fear on every kickoff.
Jeff Reed has one Touchback… See ya Skippy! Your Cut!
by WV Steeler Fan! on Nov 17, 2009 8:16 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
meanwhile, hauschka missed another kick last night
If the Steelers cut Reed, I betcha he’ll have a call in from baltimore within seconds…
by acrollet on Nov 17, 2009 8:23 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Must ask, what part of WV are you from
"From time to time gunfighters get shot."-Mike Tomlin the third greatest Steelers coach
by WVPiratesfan on Nov 17, 2009 2:15 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
You're not near me then
"From time to time gunfighters get shot."-Mike Tomlin the third greatest Steelers coach
by WVPiratesfan on Nov 17, 2009 7:51 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Unconventional is right...
And you make a good case for it too Acrollet. Maybe sneak one in at the beginning of a game (I always liked that trickery) and another in the flow of the game somewhere. You only have to do it a few times, and the opposing coaches would have to at least think about it. It couldn’t hurt. It’s not something I would want to do on a regular basis though.
'I’ve learned to become a flat-liner. There’s a lot out there that’ll make your heart jump if you allow it."
-Coach Tomlin
by NYSteelersFan4 on Nov 17, 2009 9:29 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
How about
finding some guys who can shed blockers. Even the bigger LBs we have out there are getting blocked
by qwikdoc on Nov 17, 2009 10:26 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
How about this ....
Put people on kickoffs that can actually get someone to the ground? That’s a novel concept, hungh?
by datruth4life on Nov 17, 2009 10:33 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
Let's try
getting more people who can make tackles. Ok now you go!
by worldtrip on Nov 17, 2009 10:54 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
kick it out of bounds and let the defense hold em at the 40
I wasn’t pleased because we didn’t win - Mike Tomlin (after the 2009 week 2 loss to Chicago).
by fanofsteel on Nov 17, 2009 11:40 AM EST reply actions 1 recs
this
if their average starting position is already at the 33, concede the seven yards in exchange for no possibility of a runback. Also I think you probably have to worry about alot of injuries if you’re going to use alot of onside kicks, although the occasional onside wouldn’t be a bad idea
by schnifin on Nov 17, 2009 12:05 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
How about more squib kicks?
Increases the chance for a muff and most squib kicks won’t be fielded cleanly, giving our coverage team more time to get down the field. Beats the hell out of those pop-ups that land at the 30.
by theatrain on Nov 17, 2009 1:05 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Arnold Harrisn released today
and Donovan Woods signed off the practice squad. Tomlin is obviously trying to find new bodies that will hopefully excel on special teams.
http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/09321/1014156-66.stm?cmpid=steelers.xml
by Jett on Nov 17, 2009 1:15 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
The headline on Yahoo reads: “LB Harrison cut as Steelers shore up special teams”.
Boy, that stopped my heart for a second.
Hey, an out is an out - unless you're Mario, in which case it's probably two outs. -UtesFan89
by wg1of5 on Nov 17, 2009 2:03 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
to those of you saying "just make the tackle"
if you read the article linked at the beginning of my post, the point it’s making is that every NFL teams should kick onside more often. All I’m saying is that we have a unique set of circumstances that seem to make it even more advantageous to mix one in now and then. The risks don’t seem huge, and the possible rewards are pretty good.
by acrollet on Nov 17, 2009 1:27 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
I'm interested.
I’ll have to give it some thought.
by Varmint on Nov 17, 2009 2:04 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
need some ...
work with risk-reward math.
by tenthmtnman on Nov 17, 2009 2:09 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
That aint the worst idea
If we randomly tossed, say, 2-3 a game in, and then faked out the guys, that’d be smart.
Like we could put a lineup that looked like the onside kick team out there, and then just boof it down the field.
I’d personally ascribe to squib kicks now on every play. Hell, kicking it out of bounds almost doesnt sound bad.
by Mechem on Nov 17, 2009 9:10 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Despite the thread title...
…it’s not a fix for our problems. But it might be respectable workaround. I’d certainly try it against a running team. We know our D can stop those. If the D has another strong game against a good passing team, I say start trying it against those, as well.
Using squibs and onside kicks could reduce (not eliminate) the risks while we are working on fixing the real problem.
by Varmint on Nov 18, 2009 1:23 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I don't like that Idea
Onside kicks are a real dicey call…
But as I said in a similar post… cut Logan, and get a touchback specialist…
by MarkJoel66 on Nov 20, 2009 11:52 AM EST reply actions 0 recs

by 

















