BTSC NFL Weekly Musings - Week 12 Edition
A more condensed version of my weekly NFL thoughts and observations, but I thought I'd get to them again this week if for no other reason that I don't have too much to say right now about the Pittsburgh Steelers other than I can't wait to see the team unleash hell in December, which Mike Tomlin vowed would happen in his postgame press conference following Sunday night's narrow defeat at Baltimore. If the Steelers do get on a roll and play some inspiring football; if they do rekindle that same comraderie that had them calling themselves a 'Band of Brothers' last year - well, if we are treated to them rising up in that way then wow, that's going to be special stuff to watch and enjoy. If they don't, well, hopefully then each and every person on the roster and coaching staff will reevaluate their entire approach to conditioning themselves physically and mentally for what's now essentially a 12 month long NFL season. For now, my head's held high and I'll remain optimistic and excited that this team has at least shown it has enough talent to beat anybody any week. I can't wait for Sunday to see if that hope will be eviscerated once and for all for the 2009 season or if it will extend for at least another four days when the Steelers will then square off against their rivals from along Lake Erie.
In the meantime, a few thoughts on what took place Sunday in the National Football League. I'll exclude Thanksgiving Day games, as I wrote a few things about the largely uneventful and uninteresting trio of games in my picks post this week.
* A good but not great week for my picks. The playing field in the NFL has definitely leveled out some - as it usually does - after a few weeks there early in the season when an unmistakable crop of both 'haves' and 'have nots' were emerging. The NFL changes every four weeks though, and unsurprisingly to me, it's gotten a bit tougher to make sense of which direction teams may or may not be heading. For example, I couldn't have been more confident Denver would struggle following their impressive start. I wasn't so sure they'd bounce back in such a big way against a Giants team that had been playing a bit better the previous two weeks. Is Denver back on track and a force to be reckoned with again? I'm not sure at the moment in all honesty after seeing last Thursday. I guess we'll get a bit closer to finding out when they travel to KC this weekend.
Or what about the Steelers? I'm sure there's a boatload of people who have the defending champs down and out. They may be right, but three relatively easy weeks from now and that could all change. Ah, December football. The opening leg of the season is long gone; the zigs and zags of mid-October and Novemeber football have left us thinking we know who's for real and who simply doesn't 'have it' this year.
Now, the real fun starts. For close to 20 teams in this league, it's still not too late to get on a serious roll, play your best football, sneak in to the playoffs playing the best football of the year, and shock the world with a run to the Super Bowl.
* After several weeks where I grumbled to myself, 'why, God, why was I not in Vegas this past weekend', it was back closer to reality this week. 7-4 on Sunday, with the two big whiffs coming with Carolina and St. Louis. The Panthers really crapped the bed on the road against a very beatable New York Jets team. The loss drops Carolina to 4-7 and puts to rest any glimmer of hope they may have had about sneaking in to the playoffs. Seattle meanwhile gets their first road victory since last year when they beat the same lowly St. Louis Rams. Never good to bet on a Kyle Boller led team.
* As for my other two misses, shouldn't have talked myself out of Buffalo playing better football under the new Perry Fewell regime and San Francisco outmuscling a not very talented or consistent Jacksonville Jaguars team. Buffalo earns a well earned home victory over the beat up Miami Dolphins. Kudos to Fewell on his first NFL victory as a head coach. In the loss, Ricky Williams eclipsed the century mark for the third consecutive game. He also scored his 9th rushing TD of the season, the second highest season total he's had in his remarkably odd but subtly impressive NFL career.
* Still not sure I like the Larry Johnson signing despite his 100+ yard day running the football on Sunday. What happens when Cedric Benson returns and a decision has to be made between who gets the bulk of the carries? I'm hoping for Cincy's sake (I guess) that they're just renting LJ for the extreme short term and will revert back to Benson and the promising rookie Bernard Scott. But you never know with Cincy. This could be the kind of entanglement that disrupts what's otherwise been a remarkable turnaround organizationally in terms of team chemistry. Anyway, I like this Bengals team. I like the makeup and strategic approach quite a bit, and if things break their way in terms of playoff matchups, they could very well find themselves playing for a trip to the Super Bowl.
* No surprise to me that New Orleans' offense had their way with New England's defense. Bring on the ribbing from the peanut gallery (if you weren't aware, I'm a huge Drew Brees fan) about the man crush growing ever-larger, but Brees continues to back up what I've said about the Saints quarterback since he was in 8th grade - his accuracy is legitimately mind boggling. 5 TDs on the evening for Brees, as New Orleans dusts New England at home and hands them their fourth loss of the year. All have come away from home. I still think there's about an 75% likelihood that the Pats hold on to the AFC East, but next week's game between the Pats and Dolphins in Miami could make things very interesting if the 'Fins were able to win and move within a game of the Pats.
* The Redskins continue to play better. They also continue to find new and amazing ways to lose football games. I would be shocked if the Redskins don't beat either the Giants or the Cowboys when they host the two rivals in Weeks 15 and 16. Both the Giants and the Cowboys will be fighting for their playoff lives, and Washington can still eek out some gratification from this year by standing in the way of either team.
* Goodness gracious. The Chicago Bears are a really mediocre football team. Not sure how we lost to them. Oh wait, I remember. Jeff Reed whiffed on two easy attempts. The Bears drop their fourth straight game. Jay Cutler does hit the 20 interception mark in defeat though! The 'franchise quarterback' has very little help around him, but it's getting silly how sloppy he's been with the football the majority of weeks this year. By the way, it's comical watching Broncos fans take such enormous pleasure out of watching him fail. Amazing display of insecurity. This of course was mostly coming during the Broncos and Kyle Orton's recent slide back to reality. 'But look how bad Cutler is doing, at least.' Maybe I'm being too harsh. Nah. Denver's up there with my least favorite teams in all of sports.
* My advice to fans across the league who want to pigeon hole Vince Young as an unintelligent, selfish, run-oriented only quarterback who's incapable of ever developing in to an all around great NFL signal caller - beware of the tendency humans have to monolithically lump people and objects in to convenient, identifiable categories. I'm not talking about race necessarily here. More like the notion that a quarterback like Vince Young can and will never develop in to a consistently productive NFL quarterback in the pocket and on the scoreboard where it counts based on his not perfect mechanics, his displays of immaturity early in his career, and his tendency to take off running rather than dissecting defenses from the pocket - which is of course undeniably necessary to consistently lead your team to greatness in today's NFL. He's not there yet, not by a long shot. But he's also not that far off from where Ben Roethlisberger was early in his career if you think about it. He's won a lot of games, not had fantastic statistics, turned the ball over a bit too much, and displayed a flair for the dramatic that's unteachable.
As for his accuracy and ability to ever materialize in to an above average, if not ever spectacular, pocket passer. We'll see. It will come down to his willingness to put in the work. But it's not like we're talking about someone who's never been able to throw the ball on target. The guy was after all the NCAA leader in passing efficiency his junior year in college. He obviously was arguably (in some more shall we say 'modern' circles) the greatest college player of all time thanks to his running abilities, but he was no slouch throwing the rock by the time he was a junior. I was in Austin during those years and watched him develop from a guy who couldn't throw the ball at all as a redshirt freshman, to someone who was subtly very accurate with many of his throws, despite the funky release and tendency to have the occasional total clunker thrown in there amongst the good throws.
Anyway, I thought and said as much that Jeff Fisher totally blew it waiting 6 games to yank Kerry Collins in favor of Young. It's not that Collins was the source of all of Tennessee's troubles. That's the argument people who refuse to understand what Young brings to the table in terms of pizazz and leadership say when arguing that Collins should have still been in there as long as he was. It's that he injected an entirely fresh set of competitive spirit to that team - on both sides of the ball. Now, if he can just grow up and not act like a total teenager the next time adversity sets in, and he and the Tennessee Titans will be just fine. In fact, I'd probably bet good money that if that organization can keep him and Chris Johnson together for the next 5-7 years, they'll hoist a Super Bowl trophy one of those years, (most likely closer to 2013 or '14). Their offense is in pretty damn good shape - Kenny Britt, Nate Washington, CJ, Lendale White, VY, a solid offensive line - plenty to work with. Their defense needs a bit of retooling though. Good news for them is they'll have the cap space to make a splash in free agency this next couple of years if they so choose. If they spend wisely and continue drafting well, they'll be right there a few years down the road with as dangerous a squad as anybody's.
* The Arizona Cardinals were the beneficiary of Tennessee's latest take down. The Cards have their perfect road record tarnished with the loss and fall to 7-4 on the year. Kurt Warner sat this one out and should return next week when the Cardinals host the Vikings. All of a sudden, the Cardinals fanbase (is there such a thing?) might be squirming just a bit. If the Cards lose to the Vikings, and the 49ers take down the Seahawks this weekend, the following Sunday's game between San Fran and Arizona suddenly is for the division lead. San Francisco already won the first meeting...on the road. I trust Ken Whisenhunt & Co. to not implode in any way, shape, or form. But by losing that nailbiter in Nashville, the Cards suddenly have a smaller margin for error this next couple of weeks. We'll learn something about this Cardinals team this next two weeks. I like their chances to shut the door early and often on San Francisco, beginning with a statement win this coming weekend against the Minnesota Vikings.
1 recs |
40 comments
| Add comment
|
Comments
Agreed about Brees' uncanny accuracy
I wonder how much of that is natural talent vs. his willingness to work on his throws that much harder than anyone else? If he’s not already, he should be running a summer camp for college quarterbacks.
On another subject: Blitz, I was anxious to read your take on the “dissension in the ranks” following Hines’ statements before and after the B’more game. Will you venture an opinion on this topic later? I’m curious to what extent the coaching staff created this problem, perhaps by playing too coy with the information, even to its own players, on who was going to play QB. Bouchette wrote today how the decision not to start Ben, but to “to suit him up as the emergency No. 3 quarterback remains a curious one.” It reminded me how the Ryan Clark issue in Denver was handled. Keeping your own players in the dark just to keep the opponent guessing doesn’t appear to be a successful strategy.
by MelBlunt on Dec 1, 2009 8:39 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
Dissent or not to Dissent
I really believe that what Ward said didn’t suggest that he or the team was questioning Ben’s toughness or commitment. After Collingsworth or whoever commented after the piece on NBC that Ward had called out Ben, I was struggling to remember what he said that suggested that. I was trying to remember, was i distracted at that point and missed something?
My opinion – and I would like to read what you have to say too Blitz – is that they were grasping at straws trying to make a story out of nothing…Pitt is boring, never drama. You can read all year long about Dallas/Romo, TO, Mcnabb, Vick. But Pitt, ok, BB in Tahoe, Reed, Anotnio…but still pretty quiet. Ward was just telling about how often he and others go back on the field without knowing what planet they are on, that they do it out of choice and competitiveness and expectation. Probably always has been true.
I think the stories in media and blogs just took the spoon fed non-issue from the announcers and continued it without making up their own mind and opinion after really listening to the interview. And really, any guy who hangs onto the ball and gets hit a lot – out of his own choosing, really – is not tough?
Kudos to the Docs and Coaches for considering Ben’s health first. Its about time the league did this more. These guys are human beings with families and lives, they are not expendable. Sometimes I feel guilty being a fan and watching knowing what these guys end up doing to themselves and each other.
by Twell on Dec 1, 2009 3:01 PM EST up reply actions 1 recs
Totally agree -
Kudos to the Docs and Coaches for considering Ben’s health first. Its about time the league did this more. These guys are human beings with families and lives, they are not expendable. Sometimes I feel guilty being a fan and watching knowing what these guys end up doing to themselves and each other.
I love the athleticism of football. Watching Troy leap around the field is pure joy. Watching Ben throw a perfect ball into the waiting arms of a receiver is a thing of beauty. Watching Hines leap over a would-be tackler and smile all the way into the end zone makes my day. I wish it could all be like that. I hate watching them untangle the piles to see if the runner is still alive down there. I hate it when somebody doesn’t get up right away. I hate wondering if this injury is the one that finishes a player’s season – or career. I wish there was an easy solution.
by momma rollett on Dec 2, 2009 7:01 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I still can't believe that pass to Colston for 68-69 yards.
Ridiculously bang on target.
by Han on Dec 1, 2009 4:15 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
We would do well ...
to remember that LJ is a fairly good RB who had been laboring in a bad situation, a lot of it his own making and some of it because of the team’s performance. If his situation improves, and I think it will in Cincy, LJ will once again make significant contributions. Will he become the number 1 back in town? That’s TBD, but he can contribute. Steelers will not play past Miami unless the secondary improves, and Troy coming back is not a cure-all fix. Uniforms 22 through 26 need to step it up and play solid, don’t have to be great, fundamental football. Defensive line and the ‘backers can’t be worried about what is going on behind them; the secondary needs to ease their mind by improving play … that, or the secondary should start packing up for the off season. Always good to see the Patriots take it in the shorts, equally good when a team like NO can deliver the beating. Great team in the making down there. I can’t think of a reason not to suit up Ben for an emergency. As for the locker room drama, perhaps players shouldn’t pass any judgments or comments in a situation where information is incomplete. Glad to see the Bills win; I hope it it foretells of improvements. I know the fans will be pleased as beating division opponents has always been Job 1 for Buffalo.
by tenthmtnman on Dec 1, 2009 8:58 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
Unleash Hell?
I’m a huge Tomlin fan, and love the Steelers to death.
But unleashing hell? What does that mean, and why haven’t they unleashed hell already?
Does that mean they’ll coach better, play better, blitz more? I hope it means something good….because while Tomlin-isms are fun filled…..I just don’t know what that means at this point.
We’ve got a banged up team. The O line, the D line, the secondary, and QB. It’s gonna be tough sledding the rest of the way folks. I’ll be rooting hard for the Men of Steel…..but Unleashing Hell seems kind of empty to me. I’d be happier if I knew that they were going to run MH all the time instead of FWP and happier if I knew BB was running no huddle 75% of the time, I’d feel better if I saw DD’s talent being creatively used instead of wasted on the bench. I’d be be more comfortable if I knew the secondary was practicing catching the ball for hours during practice in order to produce more INTs.
Anyway…..fun quotes don’t mean anything unless you back it up and I’m wary that that they can do it with so many injuries. Let’s hope they can do it!!!
GO STEELERS!!!
by Ragnar808 on Dec 1, 2009 10:23 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
It means that he's really PISSED now and that he will take drastic measures to make sure we start playing better.
by StoneColdSteel on Dec 1, 2009 12:53 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
That was supposed to happen after the KC game, if not the division losing game against the Bengals
…being pissed that is.
If losing a division or losing to one of the worst teams in the league does not get you pissed then I don’t know what will.
by Han on Dec 1, 2009 4:12 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I’m hoping it means that Arians will be forced to read the playbook beyond page three.
The season is far from over, but it’s starting to look a little desperate. Desperate men do desperate things, one of which should be calling more creative plays. We have called a few interesting plays this season: hypocycloid and the half-back toss being most obvious. (The butt-flop reverse is another favorite.) Of all of them only the Wallace reverse has made it to the regular playbook. If Arians was saving those for the post-season, he’d better break open the piggy.
by Varmint on Dec 1, 2009 1:03 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
remember that WR formation where 4 of them were all on the same side? That was cool….
by Ragnar808 on Dec 1, 2009 2:25 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Yup
I nicknamed that one hypocycloid. That play has earned quite a few fans.
by Varmint on Dec 2, 2009 2:39 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
What other choice do they have except to unleash Hell?
One thing for sure: we’re gonna find out what this team is made of in the next few weeks.
by Billy52 on Dec 1, 2009 4:51 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Good question
Lemme think about that…
Unleash heaven?
Unleash heck?
Unleash Deebo’s puppy?
Unleash leCharles?
Unleash special teams!?!?
Never mind. I think Tomlin got it right.
by Varmint on Dec 2, 2009 2:47 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I would have been amused if he said Unleash LeCharles.
You sure Ike isn’t reacquainting himself with his fingers, he certainly doesn’t use them for catching. - Brian (DaBolts) on "Face Me Ike"
by steelguy99 on Dec 2, 2009 3:00 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
putting dixon out for gadgets is a fun idea
but I just don’t see it happening – first and foremost, he’s now our #2 – no sense in risking an injury to our insurance policy. Secondly, you, I and every team in the NFL know that if he comes out, it’s going to be for some sort of run-pass option play, so they’ll do what the purplebrowns did and leave a safety over him. That would be great if his deep ball was better and more accurate than Ben’s, but it’s just not. He’s certainly not going to run any wildcat-type plays, because it’s been proven that Arians doesn’t want to get him “snapped in half”. (pretty sure that was the quote) Most of all, Dixon had a great game for a second-year player making his first start against a tough D, but there’s no point in taking our best player off the field to put him in.
by acrollet on Dec 1, 2009 10:23 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Arizona over Minnie
That’s a bold prediction there, Blitz. Even with the home crowd I don’t think AZ is in the Vikes league.
I understand that Favre is a great story but to me Brees is the no-doubt-about-it MVP. Not just incredible accuracy but amazing poise in the pocket.
Gruden said this last night: Look at Sean Payton’s play sheet. It’s gigantic. They bring an incredible number of plays to every game and Brees seems to have flawless command of the offense.
by Steelers in XLIV on Dec 1, 2009 10:47 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
Lendale is leaving Tennessee after this season for sure.
I'll drink your Milkshake, I'll drink it up!
by drinkyourmilkshake on Dec 1, 2009 10:53 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
Kudos on the Brees praise. I grew up in the Dallas area, and remember roadtripping at one point down to Austin just to see Brees command Westlake. He was a freak then, and is still a freak today.
by VA Libertarian on Dec 1, 2009 12:15 PM EST via mobile reply actions 0 recs
Falls Church is right down the road from me. I live in Woodbridge area and work in Arlington.
I'll drink your Milkshake, I'll drink it up!
by drinkyourmilkshake on Dec 1, 2009 1:48 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Very nice. Which bar do you head to for the games (or do you watch at home)?
by VA Libertarian on Dec 2, 2009 4:32 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Don’t get him started, haha
Wall of Shame
-"I’m glad we play Pitt twice, and not Tenn this year." - Brownie's Year
-"BB is ok (slightly overated)…but he is NO Kyle Orton! I’ll take Kyle over Ben any day" - Bronco_Fan_Tom
-PIT 24 KC 27
by Johnny_S on Dec 1, 2009 1:54 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
HS Football
I love stories like that one about you road-tripping to see Brees in HS.
One of these days a good thread would be: who was the best HS football player you ever saw in person?
For me it was Sean Gilbert. Never really lived up to his billing as a pro but in HS he was like the #1 recruit in the country. He was scary.
Honestly, as a Dad, if my son were playing HS football against Sean Gilbert I would have been f**king terrified. His HS games were the biggest physical mismatch I’ve ever seen on a field of any kind.
by Steelers in XLIV on Dec 1, 2009 2:08 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I agree – this would make a fantastic thread.
Other great players I got to see while they were in high school:
Adrian Peterson (Palestine)
Matt Stafford (Highland Park)
Justin Blalock (Plano East)
Granted, I thought then (and still think now) that Stafford’s a punk, but I digress.
by VA Libertarian on Dec 2, 2009 4:38 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
My brother played versuses Timmy Dwight in HS. He actually had one tackle on him. He said he was so much better than everyone else on the field it was ridiculous.
by Chicago Steeler on Dec 3, 2009 3:12 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
VY to Ben comparison?
You know I never like to be disagreeable ;) , but I have to question the comparison of Vince Young to Big Ben. Ben was completing over 62% of his passes in the first 2 seasons, with 34 TDs and 20 INTs over those 2 seasons. In Vince’s first 2 seasons, he had 30 INT’s and only 21 TD passes. I would say his early career more closely resembles Michael Vick’s. Both had poor passing numbers, but because of what they could do with their legs, they had a knack for winning football games. Ben’s passing was much better than Young’s from the beginning. Young may develop into a quality QB, and he does seem to have put his childishness behind him. IMO, that is the most important aspect of the whole situation for him.
As far as criticizing Fisher: I probably would have hesitated to go back to VY after what he pulled last season, particularly after Collins got them to 13-3. But, if Young continues to show maturity, they could very well be hoisting a Lombardi in a few years, as you say.
For ideas on statistical analyses, email me at wolfpacksteelersfan@gmail.com.
by WolfpackSteelersFan on Dec 1, 2009 1:54 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Ravens LB Paul Kruger has more ints than Gay and Ike combined this year
Kruger has 1; Gay and Taylor combined has zero. Does anyone here, like me, think that MIGHT be a problem?
by datruth4life on Dec 1, 2009 3:13 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
And yet shockingly, the best CB on the roster last year McFadden has 0 for arizona this year.
You sure Ike isn’t reacquainting himself with his fingers, he certainly doesn’t use them for catching. - Brian (DaBolts) on "Face Me Ike"
by steelguy99 on Dec 1, 2009 3:33 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I think it's a problem when your starting CB's have zero ints through the first 11 games
Add to that fact that your starting FS only has 2 and has either dropped about 4 others and ignored another 3 in favor of the big hit, I think any team would be licking their chops at our secondary minus Troy P.
Who believes this secondary is in need of an upgrade at the corners and free safety?
by datruth4life on Dec 1, 2009 4:34 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
I think safety is a more notable position in the turnover department. While I’d love to have two shutdown corners that generate hundreds of turnovers, that isn’t very realistic in terms of salary cap, nor is it necessary. In terms of cornerbacks we have talent up and coming in the roster. If Keenan Lewis can’t help this team, than they screwed up. If Lewis steps up next year we could have two press coverage corners and a solid nickel in willie gay, and very well have a dime in Burnett.
Safety on the other hand? The problem is we have an awesome safety, he just hasn’t played much this year. Clark looks very out of place without Troy P. He could stand an upgrade, and Mundy doesn’t look like he is going to be able to play with Troy.
For further CB/Safety comparison we could look at the ravens, widely regarded as being excellent at generating interceptions. They have a mere two coming from their CBs, and while 2 is greater than 0, it’s not that incredibly different in the numbers game. Reed has 3 this year, and Landry has 4.
You sure Ike isn’t reacquainting himself with his fingers, he certainly doesn’t use them for catching. - Brian (DaBolts) on "Face Me Ike"
by steelguy99 on Dec 1, 2009 5:08 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Yep
And they will look to upgrade at safety in the first day of the draft for sure. I think the FO will let Ryan Clark go. We need a ballhawk safety more than an enforcer, IMO. I’d rather have 8 picks and 3 huge hits than the other way around. I love hitting, and I love Ryan Clark, but when it comes down to it, turnovers win you games, and that’s the bottom line…
by Steelfrog on Dec 1, 2009 6:20 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
I think Clark could very well stay, it depends on what he is willing to make.
You sure Ike isn’t reacquainting himself with his fingers, he certainly doesn’t use them for catching. - Brian (DaBolts) on "Face Me Ike"
by steelguy99 on Dec 1, 2009 8:23 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Good
Honestly, I’d really like it if they resigned Clark. I really like the guy. He’s had a disappointing season, but he’s a good player and I’m pretty sure he would be better with Troy in there. And he could very well be resigned but it would have to be for a good price. He’ll be over 30 next year, though, so I’m pretty sure safety help through the draft is on the way. I also hope at least one of the two young corners turns out to be good. William Gay seems like a nickelback, not a starter and we need at least one guy back there with hands. Who knew that “Big Play” Willie Gay meant big plays for the other team!
by Steelfrog on Dec 1, 2009 9:58 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I don’t disagree, but I will say this about Clark: he’s money in the running game. It was more obvious last season, but he’s very good when the field gets short. Clark was key stopping the run near the goal line.
by Varmint on Dec 2, 2009 2:53 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Here's a thought
Maybe we draft a playmaking free safety and, down the road, Clark replaces Carter as the veteran third safety… He did play strong safety in Washington and is certainly physical enough!
by Steelfrog on Dec 2, 2009 4:31 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Mike Tomlin
It seems that everything that you read or hear about M.T., he’s not to overly concerned about anything. If he hasn’t noticed the Burgh is not leading the AFC North. Start doing what a head coach should do and, stop looking for the definitive answers durning your comments in the news conferences. Show that you are the coach the Steeler Nation believes you are. Get Involved!
by steel-ten on Dec 1, 2009 6:54 PM EST reply actions 0 recs



















