Good news, bad news - does Sundays win further entrench Arians?
After basking in the glory of Sunday night's potential season-saving win and reading all the (deserved) kudos going out to Big Ben and the offence, I began to have a growing unease in the pit of my stomach. Is it possible that Sunday's win (the good news) has the undesirable effect of strengthening Arians hold on the OC job moving forward into next season (the bad news)?
It seems most sports teams have their organizational "blindspots" - things that seem plain to their fans that MUST be fixed but that the team itself just doesn't seem to get. Elsewhere in the NFL, the Cowboys have Wade Phillips as head coach and Tony Romo at QB, and everyone knows that this combo will result in more end-of-season heartbreak. Everyone but Dan Snyder seems to know that the Redskins will never be good till the owner turns over control of his team to a true football man. Ditto Al Davis and the Raiders. The other teams I cheer for all have these "blind spots". The Flyers front office continues to spend to the cap to put together a strong team, while saving money on second tier goalies. The Raptors can't rebound or play defence, yet continue to sign more European perimeter players than anyone in the NBA. The Blue Jays took 8 years of watching JP Ricciardi spend literally hundreds of millions on the likes of Frank Thomas, BJ Ryan and Vernon Wells before finally firing him this fall.
The Steelers "blind spots", of course, concern offensive scheme, playcalling, and the offence run by OC Bruce Arians. Why can't the people in charge see that the team needs to run the ball more, that the empty backfield set is an invite to sack BB yet again, that someone needs to help our QB learn that it is OK to throw the ball away once a game maybe, that it is possible to have the skill that our offence has and to use that skill more effectively in terms of controlling the clock, using Mendenhall's strength as a runner, blocker, and receiver, and winning ball games, etc. etc. And the one silver-lining to our miserable 5 game losing streak was that this "blind spot" was now clear not only to all us fans, but to the FO as well. We may be missing the playoffs, we were all thinking, but at least at the end of the season Arians was as good as gone. Then came Sunday, with Tomlin short-kicking to insure our offence had the ball at the end of the game as this was our only chance to win. And we won.
The funny thing about team's "blind spots" is how one piece of evidence (like Sunday's win for the Steelers, Saturday's win over the Saints for the Cowboys, the Flyers doing well one year with Marty Biron in net, JP drafting Adam Lind etc.) can somehow overcome all the other evidence that the current way of doing things is not the best way. We won Sunday with Ben being sacked 5 times, while extending other plays and making big yards out of it, while throwing the ball 46 times and running it only 19. Heck we even "held" the ball for 35 minutes playing this way!!
I'm still ecstatic that we won Sunday. I just hope we take the proper lessons from it. Two teams have scored 21 points or more on us in the 4th quarter in the last 3 weeks - teams shouldn't be getting 3 possessions in the 4th quarter yet alone scoring 3 times. This wouldn't happen if we had the kind of ball control on offence that this team would be capable of with better schemes, play calling etc. Let's hope that the organization sees it this way too and doesn't see our win Sunday as evidence that the Arians-BB philosophy of offence isn't only working, it's actually the optimal way of doing things.....
103 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Offense
There’s a problem with your argument. Actually several.
1) I agree that Bruce Arians’ playcalling is a major issue, but sorry to say, the Steelers’ offense is built as a passing team. We have three excellent wideouts. Two solid passcatching running backs. And a superb tight end in Heath Miller. The only issue is the Steelers’ offensive line. Indiviudally, I think they are all actually above average, but together they are average at best. This is because they are all built as run blockers, not pass protectors. They are all big men that are not very nimble on their feet. If we want to continue this pass culture, we need to put smaller linemen in place. See the Colts offensive line, the Saints offensive line, etc. They need to be more athletic and less massive. Chris Kemoeatu is however, a future pro bowler. He is as solid as they come.
2) As far as running plays go, we do not need to run more (that Cleveland game not withstanding). We just need to run smarter. Rashard is blossoming and with the addition of another young running back with Mewelde after Parker’s assured leaving, we could develop a solid running corps that would benefit Ben and the passing game. Screens to the running backs as well as pitch plays to the outside would keep the opposing defense honest and help open holes in the inside as well. There essentially needs to be a place for the running game in this offense. But I can certainly see it happening hopefully next year if Arians does stay.
Bruce Arians is who he is. However, in the coming years I do see Ben taking the reins of this offense more and more away from whoever the coordinator may be. He may not take Peyton Manning-type control, but I see the no huddle becoming a more feasible option as well as audibles called at the line of scrimmage. If anything my hope is that 2009 is a transition year, a period of rediscovery for the Pittsburgh Steelers. The same is true for the Steelers defense. But one thing is certain. The Big Ben passing offense is here to stay, and if Sunday’s game was any indication, that may not be such a bad thing.
I'm sorry, #1 is not an appropriate argument...
This offense is set-up to be perfectly balanced. 5 run blocking linemen with a dual threat tight end, a blossoming back and 3 excellent receivers sounds pretty balanced. It looks like half the team excels at passing and the other half at running.
We have all the pieces to be great offensively except for a competent OC.
O-line was last year's "blind spot" I think
As to #1: Yes we are a talented, skilled offence – no debate there. But playcalling goes to the OC and his playcalling overall hurts our chances at winning more than it helps. So my overall point that our success Sunday, in spite of our OC’s playcalling etc. , might just enhance his chances of staying, and that this isn’t good, still holds. Interestingly enough I think the 0-line was last year’s “blind spot” – the fans all knew it wasn’t good enough but we won a Super Bowl so other than a new starter because of injury we pretty much re-upped everyone else. The result is we still lack confidence running the ball on short yardage and our QB still gets sacked too much.
As to #2: The difference between ‘running more’ and ‘running smarter’ is likely semantics. The point at which we would agree I think is that you need to be able to run when the circumstances call for it (maybe to bleed some clock in the 4th quarter or to get a crucial score early). But to suggest such a running game will magically appear next year even if BA stays is to totally miss what Bruce “there is no fullback in my offence” Arians stands for – he believes in throwing it all over the field pretty much at any point. If he believed as we both do that “there essentially needs to be a place for the running game in this offence” many fans wouldn’t want to see him on the first bus out of town….
I do agree that BB taking more control over the offence is inevitable, and he is incredibly strong in “no huddle” situations. But neither one of those things require BA to still be the OC. In fact, a new OC might allow BB to grow in those areas he needs to without sacrificing his obvious strengths. And I think most fans are ready to see just that.
by touchemalljoe on Dec 22, 2009 8:57 PM EST up reply actions
runniing..
no need for a 1000yd back..I am fine with mendy getting 900 rushing, and 500 passing..with a number 2 back getting some carries..
by nycsteelerfan on Dec 22, 2009 4:17 PM EST up reply actions
I'm not
1000yd is bare minimal imho :)
Steelers football is 60 mins.
by tannofsteel84 on Dec 22, 2009 4:19 PM EST up reply actions
Agreed..
I’ve come to the conclusion that statistics are irrelevant. Wins are all that matter. In the end, I want an OC who can produce results. We lost 5 games in an unacceptable fashion because our OC was unable to adapt and adjust.
The cincy games were on the offense as much as the defense, same with the Browns and Raiders. Our Offense is not capable of delivering a knockout blow. It seems like they can only score with their backs against the wall and you have to throw the playbook out the window and just make a play.
coehesive o-line
the line has had to rotate new bodies in to cover injuries. I find this unfortunate(obviously), our original line surprised us all with their protection early on. There has been various issues that make our o-line’s numbers worse than their play had really been
"Now that I'm here, I don't want to just be here, I want to be here for a long time." Hines Ward, 1998 4th round draft pick.
by kick him in the head on Dec 22, 2009 4:29 PM EST up reply actions
I don't give credit to Arians for this one
Yea I know I know, but this was a typical Arians game. Great game plan to begin with but no adjustments to continue success after halftime. We had 3 field goals before bens magical last drive. Thats the problem with Arians after awhile he bogs down into the same thing and fails to get the ball into the endzone. That is what cost us games sometimes because while our defense is letting other teams score TDs, we get FGs and the other team catches up.
In the hurry-up offense, Ben is doing all the play calling then. Its crazy how we score when Ben is calling the plays. We need more TD production out of our base offense. Arians can get us yards but thats not what wins games. I thought that all Arians needed was better line play but when you design plays to take 5-7 secs, that is asking a lot from the lines. Arians isn’t a good game adjusting coordinator, he has a game plan from the beginning of the game that he sticks to no matter what.
I think Tomlin is done with Arians, we still don’t know much about him because he was basically handed his coordinators. But I get the feeling that he isn’t going down with them. If push comes to shove he will get rid of his coordinators before he gets canned. It would take another Super Bowl for Arians to keep his job. If Troy comes back he might just get it.
Steelers football is 60 mins.
Really
then how would you run the no huddle?
Steelers football is 60 mins.
by tannofsteel84 on Dec 23, 2009 9:35 AM EST up reply actions
Communications in the helmet
to go along with Ben’s voice & hand signals?
"Sick Puppy is ultimately as unforgiving as nature's order... There is no redemption or apology." - wikipedia
Coach T mentioned in presser that Ben received calls from the sidelines.
"We are only going to score 17 points?"
I buy that kinda
Wallace said on the last play the call was just to run a fly route, sounds like BA.
Steelers football is 60 mins.
by tannofsteel84 on Dec 23, 2009 1:39 PM EST up reply actions
west ooast offense
designed for quick releases, quich runs, FB and some long passes..look at philly..
how many SB's do philly
have
Steelers football is 60 mins.
by tannofsteel84 on Dec 22, 2009 4:19 PM EST up reply actions
West coast offenses require a QB that can throw precision timed short passes. Ben is not a precision timeed QB. If you want a west coast offense you need a new QB. Ben is a QB that is not a dink and dunk, he plays sand lot football.
Some of the west coast offenses forget how to run the ball and rely on the short passes rather than running the ball. Ben is not always accurate on the short passes. Also in November and December you need to run the ball because of the weather.
If you want to go to the zone/cut blocking like Denver ran for years you need fast agile OL. You would need to replace all of the OL. While I agree that some need to be replaced, you can not do it in 1 year.
If you want to go west coast and bring in Kubiak, you will need a new QB and a new OL. That will set you back for years.
Bring in a OC with a balanced approach and we can win now. Assuming you also bring in a new ST, OL and DB coach and fix some of the holes on defense.
by Steeler Nation VA on Dec 22, 2009 11:00 PM EST up reply actions
"In Novemberand December you need to run the ball because of the weather"
as evidenced by Ben throwing for 503 on December 20. Just sayin.
The only managing Ben does is he manages to WIN games
by chewiesteeler on Dec 23, 2009 2:17 PM EST up reply actions
Bad choice to use as a comparison
Same crappy conditions in Philly in the winter. Tannofsteel is right, no SB’s in Philly because of the West Coast Offense.
Up until this year, the Steelers have had better wide-outs and TE’s than the Eagles and the West Coast killed the Eagles in back-half of the year. Same problems that we’re seeing with our gang – by the 4th Q, the D is tired and run down because there is no clock control with the passes.
Also, Reid doesn’t believe in the FB position like our good buddy Arians, and you wonder why Westbrook gets hammered every year? So they sign Weave this year, and he’s been the best player on the field (especially when Jackson got hurt).
Is Weaver a FA after this year?
Thought I read somewhere that he was. Love to see him in Black & Gold.
The only managing Ben does is he manages to WIN games
by chewiesteeler on Dec 23, 2009 3:50 PM EST up reply actions
I'm not exactly sure.
Knowing Reid and his disdane for the FB, it wouldn’t surprise me if it was a one year deal. Then again, to get him to come here at all, knowing how little Reid uses the position?
He’s been great for them, I can tell you that. I’m stuck with the Eagles games in my area, and when Westbrook went down, Weaver and McCoy have done quite well as replacements.
I’ve been jealous all year of watching them play-action pass, use check downs and the screen passes. Mendy looked great the one time he would get a pass per game, and then the Packers game was a revalation – we have another weapon! Duh!
san fran
Didnt beat the bears in frigid chicago, 1986???
by nycsteelerfan on Dec 23, 2009 4:38 PM EST up reply actions
November/December in the East.
If we’re talking about an offensive scheme, that’s going to mean 16 games. At least 8 are during the cold/windy/snowy weather. One game in Chicago doesn’t represent a body of work. This is the NFL, any one team can win on any given Sunday.
I haven’t looked and I could be wrong, but I would guess the loss was after they clinched.
btw
Mcnabb NEVER had weapons like this!
by nycsteelerfan on Dec 23, 2009 4:38 PM EST up reply actions
Go back and read the comment.
Up until this year, I totally agree he didn’t. Now take a look at the weapons, and especially in recent weeks when they’ve been much stronger looking, at WHY that is. The balance of pass/run is starting to increase on the run side. In part because of the FB Weaver who’s been playing out of his mind.
I have no beef with a FB..
I think it has a place! Balance is fine..It is a passing league, cant change that..But, we all agree running IS important..Especially short yardage..It drives me crazy when I see an empty backfield, shot gun formation 3rd and 2! Shot gun is fine on third and 2…just have a RB there next to BB to keep the defense honest..
by nycsteelerfan on Dec 24, 2009 7:55 PM EST up reply actions
why??
wasn’t Rathmann with San fran FB?
by nycsteelerfan on Dec 25, 2009 10:04 AM EST up reply actions
I'm pretty sure he was, yes.
I’m also pretty sure that offense wasn’t the modern day West Coast Offense that we’re talking about. The actually ran both Craig and Rathman out of multiple back sets as well as single back sets.
I’m really not looking to bust your chops here, please don’t get that idea. But we’re talking about two different offenses. The West Coast version that is talked about in today’s NFL is single back and/or emply back-field. I live in the Philly area so I have to read and see it all the time and the best and most consistent that the Eagles have played has been this year. I may be making too much out of it, but this is the most they’ve used a two-back set. Might be because Westbrook is out, might just be that Weaver can play.
Neal never scored to scoring TDs in a game
Neal was just a blocker and a great one at that. Think along thos lines if Summers becomes a good blocking FB we could have Dual attack with him and Mendenhall ala Franco, and Rocky
I getting tired of saying this: Dick LeBeau’s system is so complex very few rookies can make an impact.
Yeah I don't think WC is for us.
We’re built or being built to run in January, Which WC isn’t good ala the Eagles.
I getting tired of saying this: Dick LeBeau’s system is so complex very few rookies can make an impact.
Water closet?
"A pessimist sees the difficulty in every opportunity; an optimist sees the opportunity in every difficulty." - Winston Churchill
by PixburghArn on Dec 30, 2009 10:37 AM EST up reply actions
I appreciate the debate!
Why can’t we run that version of the west coast offense like San Fan did with the FB? BTW, Is Frank the “tank” summers that kind of FB?
by nycsteelerfan on Dec 27, 2009 10:15 AM EST up reply actions
Four reasons:
1) Our O-lineman in the current state (which I’m not sure we know what the current state is anyway) are not the type that can keep the pass blocks long enough to run the offense.
2) While Ben has been more accurate as of late, he’s not pin-point enough to run this type of O and he doesn’t understand how to throw the ball away if the play isn’t there.
3) The D’s in our Division are way too fast and tackle too well – remember that one of the sell points on the WC is the YAC runs. You can argue that our guys do a fine job right now with yards after the catch, but a good part of that is due to the nature of our ‘breakdown to the playground’ style we run now. (It’s not a product of the play itself but more so a by-product of a play that gets rescued when the actual called play didn’t work.) If we can’t win in our own division, then it’s not worth running.
4) Watch the Eagles and see how far they go.
East?
Is it in the East or in Cold weather?
Thinking GB ran a west coast offense and last I checked GB gets some snow every so often and some single digits games here and there.
Both, but more so cold weather - I stand corrected.
I would go back and double check – they ran an off-shoot of it that morphed into a heavier run version in the cold. I am assume you’re talking about the Favre years….I bet if we checked, there would be 1,000 yard rusher each year, with a heavier work-load in the second half of the season. Most importantly, it would be much more balanced the later the seaon(s) went.
A true West Coast, a la the 49’ers and what the Eagles run doesn’t cut it later in the season.
He's going to hold onto the ball no matter what offense is run.
Up till this year the Eagles didn’t have a FB, btw.
Probably not going anywhere folks...
They won the SuperBowl last year. Plus, BB loves him (apparently), so what does that spell? One more year at least. Can’t imagine that Tomlin or the FO will let him go. That 500 yard performance should certainly seal the deal.
Now, I may not like the guy’s playcalling but that doesn’t add up to much. I believe the FO will convey their concerns and criticims to Tomlin and then Arians but it’s too soon to expect a change.. no matter how much we may all want it.
I would agree with the original post that the running games woes are largely to do with the O Line. Watch what happens on any short yardage play – the Steelers line gets very little push. 4th and 1 has become a 50/50 proposition at best. This is as basic as it gets and our O Line isn’t very good at moving bodies, not with any consistency.
"Franz" in NoCal
Doesn't it usually work that teams with explosive/dominant defenses...
need a ball control offense, and teams with a dominant offense, because so much is invested on that side of the ball, employ bend-but-don’t-break defenses? I understand that you can’t pay everyone, so what type of team does the coaching staff and FO see us being, because, though I’d like to hope it’s just an off year, we seem to be in a period of transistion.
Doesn't have to be
Those things are a reflection of the head coach’s philosophy. Conservative coaches like ball control offense, low risk playcalling and an emphasis on defense. Other guys (usually former OCs) like to play a more wide open offense and place less emphasis on defense in general because they focus on offensive production being the key to winning.
This all plays into which players they draft and how they are used. It becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy if you will. Everyone wants to score 50 and put up a goose egg for the defense at the end of the game but that never happens.
Tomlin is a defensive guy by coaching trade. He’ll certainly take a high-flying offense as long as they don’t consistently leave the defense in the lurch. Given that the Steelers have a lot of $$$ tied up in offensive skill players, their defense may be less effective for a few years. The biggest issue with the offense was being forced to pay guys like Starks big money when his play is so inconsistent. They felt they needed to pay him to protect BB since he is the only LT they really have. The other guys are lower rent O Linemen. They let Faneca go in an effort to trim overall payroll I suspect and because he had a few years on him. Guys like Colon are a dime a dozen and he plays like it most of the time.
"Franz" in NoCal
Starks isn't so much inconsistent
as it is that he faces the very best pass-rushers of the opponent every week.
He’s NOT gonna stop everybody all the time. Nobody could do that. Not against the other team’s pass-rush ace, every single week.
My nominee for best typo:
the offence run by OC Bruce Arians
"We just have to play better as a whole team." James Harrison
by LongTimeSteelersFan on Dec 22, 2009 9:35 PM EST reply actions
Any particularly stupid teams looking for a new Head Coach
Maybe someone will take him off our hands, and take the decision out of the team’s hands.
Man that'd be sweet.
who’s on the hot seat this year as far as HC go?
Bring a towel to the game. Black or gold or yellow. If you don't have one buy one, If you can't buy one, dye one!
Xbox Live Gamertag- Alf Ardanyu
by SoCalSteelerFan on Dec 22, 2009 10:40 PM EST up reply actions
He's a Defensive guy I think.
I getting tired of saying this: Dick LeBeau’s system is so complex very few rookies can make an impact.
by Steel in FL on Dec 23, 2009 11:08 PM EST up reply actions
Devil's advocate
1.The argument that BA needs to adjust because the defense has given up 21 pts in the 4th qtr in a number of games is weak. That’s a defensive issue, not BA’s fault. Yes, controlling the clock helps to keep the opposition from scoring but so does not letting the opposing team pick up 30+ yds at a clip. We have a defensive problem on our hands, specifically a porous secondary which may or may not be a result of Troy’s absence. Regardless, to put the blame on BA for defensive collapses is to have a “blind spot” to the real problem, the defense.
2. I’ve watched games and yelled at BA for what appears to be a lack of creative playcalling but isn’t it possible that the inability to run the ball is more related to the players who are executing (o-line) than the guy who simply calls the plays? Does anyone think that if the running game was executing at the level of the passing game BA would avoid it? Honestly, I sometimes just wish he would stick with what works instead of forcing a non-existent running game to pick up yards.
3. Many agree that the o-line was a train-wreck for most of the year last year, improved late in the year and was making strides throughout this year. Most people also understand that it “all starts with the line”. Is it possible that BA has actually taken lemons and made lemonade? They’ve pieced together a B-string line and turned out a pretty successful offense despite glaring weaknesses. That seems to be a pretty solid point in his favor.
Just trying to look at it from an angle other than “BA sucks and needs to go” because reality is that he probably isn’t going anywhere.
I've contemplated this issue...
but the I firmly believe it is the offensive scheme that is to blame for the lack of running game. If you watch, most running plays are being run out of a 2 tight set with no lead-blocking fullback. What this does is force your 2 TEs (and sometimes Hines) to have to win their one-on-one blocking assignments or execute the appropriate zone blocks. I don’t know about you, but I don’t want to rely on TEs and WR’s to open running lanes. Instead, a FB can replace Spaeth and help create space at the point of attack. So, from what I’ve seen, BAs sets don’t support a power running game.
Also, I watched some of the Indy vs. Jax game and I noticed toward the end of the game Indy was running the ball with a FB in the game. And, I very rarely saw Manning in the gun without a back to help block. I bring this up because many people claim BA is trying to run an offense that mirrors Moore and Manning’s in Indy. I really don’t think the offense BA run really resembles the one in Indy at all. BA is running BAs offense and he’s already stated he’s not changing come hell or high water.
by mactastic07 on Dec 22, 2009 11:13 PM EST up reply actions
The problem with your argument is that we are able to run the ball. BA just panics and abandoms the run in the 4th quarter when it is imperative that we control the clock.
by Steeler Nation VA on Dec 22, 2009 11:29 PM EST up reply actions
Not consistently...
Mendy or Parker will rip off a 8-10 yd run and follow it up with a loss or no gain. Obviously, the success of the run game depends on the plays that are called. Not all of our running plays are unsuccessful. One of our best running plays involves a pulling guard. Getting players in motion, whether it be linemen or FB’s, help to create a downhill style running game. However, Arians also uses a bunch of singleback 2-3 tight sets when running the ball.
IMHO, running the ball is an attitude. The coach can help build this attitude through the scheme. I almost wonder if BA calls certain plays to sabotage they run so it can vindicate his passing attack. I’m not a conspiracy theorist, but I wonder why he continue to run the same plays out of the same sets when they have proven time and again that they don’t work.
I think BA
throws up in his mouth every time he calls a running play – acid reflux
Steelers football is 60 mins.
by tannofsteel84 on Dec 23, 2009 9:36 AM EST up reply actions
Do not get me wrong, BB had a great game and I am thrilled that we one a game finally. But we could have and should have locked the game up without the last second heroics.
The Steelers were down by 1 point with 7:49 left on the clock and at their own 31 yard line. Plenty of time to score and still control the clock. Well, we ran the ball once, good for 11 yards but was called back due to holding. That was the last running play of the game for the Steelers. We drove down the field to score in left 3:58 on the clock. If we had run a balanced attack, we could have scored with no time (or almost no time) left on the clock. Instead, we panicked and left plenty of time left on the clock for GB to score. They just were not smart enough either to eat up the clock.
Does BA think that it is against the rules to run the ball and control the clock in the 4th quarter? Last year we controlled the ball for the entire 3rd quarter against SD. Why do we always have to rush down the field to score and give the ball back to the other team with time left on the clock?
A good 4 minute offense gets first downs, eats up the clock and scores with no time left. One of the eagles problems in previous years was the fact that they had no running game and could not close out games. We have a good running game with Mendenhall and the OL is doing a good job blocking. If you have no confidence in the defense control the ball and the clock.
We had had this problem all year. BA refuses to call running plays when we need to control the clock. So often her would call 3 pass plays and a punt. Then the other team drives down the field for a winning TD or FG. I think he is so hung up on the passing statistics that winning is secondary.
Anybody who has been a Steeler fan for a long time knows that in November and December you need to run the ball to win. And in the 4th quarter, the Steelers control the clock by running the ball all the way to another victory.
by Steeler Nation VA on Dec 22, 2009 10:57 PM EST reply actions
Why is it-
that we seem to get holding called against only on successful plays?
Against the Packers we were called for holding almost every time we had a big play, except(thanks to The Football Gods) on the last drive.
Everbody knows holding could be called on pretty much every down; how is it that the Steelers only seemed to do it when they made big plays?
I’m not blaming the refs, necessarily- just asking a fair question. Especially with our Harrison being held so much. Anybody else feel that way on Sunday?
It was a big play because they held
Otherwise, the man being held would have made or assisted on the tackle. You hold because you are getting beat. You hold because you can’t block the man assigned to you, mostly because you are inferior from a talent perspective.
A good OC helps his O Line by calling plays which enhance their ability to block it. This has to do with defensive alignments and also creating a gameplan against superior players like a Haynesworth on the D Line. I don’t think the Steelers O Line is very good – that’s why the run game is so inconsistent. I also think BA is a wacky play-caller – his calls do not seem to be good versus certain defenses during large portions of the game. The problem is two-fold from what I have seen.
The same can now be said of LeBeau on defense. His talent pool is getting smaller and so he can’t run everything he would otherwise. This leads to being more predictable which only helps the offense aligned against them. I do believe Dick is much better at setting his players up to win a given down than BA. There are limits to what he can do however.
Notice how the defense rushes 4 guys almost every time the offense goes to shotgun with one or no backs? He doesn’t want to blitz because he knows his secondary stinks like rotten garbage. LeBeau is awesome but his scheme is no longer cutting edge combined with the fact that his team isn’t as good. Offensive guys have been studying his scheme for 15 years and know his stuff – hell everyone has copied it for years. It’s not a new thing anymore. He can only do what he feels comfortable with. The zone blitz is designed to bring some added pressure through rushing 5 and playing zone behind it. He is a former DB, so he knows giving up the big play is about the worst thing that can happen. Unfortunately, they can’t get off the field now, so the other teams are scoring anyway.
I would love to see more 6 and 7 man blitzes. I would love to see Harrison and Timmons switch roles on some plays. I would love to see our DBs cover someone on 3rd and 15!!
"Franz" in NoCal
by franz on Dec 23, 2009 12:27 PM EST up reply actions 2 recs
So explain
why Harrison doesn’t get more holding calls. On GB first TD he was clearly being held for about a good 2 seconds which gave Rodgers enough time to throw the ball, otherwise that play ends in a sack then GB punts and the game is entirely different there. I’m not saying that there is a conspiracy I’m just saying when you leave the rules open to subjectivity you often do yourself a disservice with imperfect humans trying to be subjectively objective when it comes to calling this penalties.
Steelers football is 60 mins.
by tannofsteel84 on Dec 23, 2009 1:44 PM EST up reply actions
Right
I’m not crying “conspiracy” either; I’m just saying that I see our O-line called for holding every week for things the opponents do too and get away with.
For example:
Max blocked a guy out on an outside speedrush where the defender turned himself inside, up underneath Max’s point of balance. Naturally, Max fell on top of the guy. The announcers fell all over themselves talking about how an OT “just can’t tackle a defender!”. Except- Max DIDN’T tackle the guy; the defender got up under Max and caused Max to fall on him. On the next offensive series by GB, their O-linemen were laying on top of Harrison and Timons on nearly every down, with nary a call against them.
Why?
Because referees get it in their heads that certain players or teams are breaking the rules while others are held to a different standard.
Look at the huge difference between how ref’s protect Tom Brady with roughing penalties while they let Ben get drilled without ever calling foul. There’s a subconscious difference there resulting in certain teams and players being viewed differently by the officials. Sure- we get our share of calls going our way. Every team does. But it doesn’t seem consistent, that’s for sure…
Rec'd
It’s always nice to get the voice of experience. Thanks Franz.
by Chicago Steeler on Dec 24, 2009 8:48 AM EST up reply actions
Anybody remember the Patriots offense in 2007?
Early in the year, when it was warm outside, their spread-offense was unstoppable. They even blew us out and we had a top 3 defense.
But when it started to get colder outside they began to look a little rusty. The bad conditions made it tougher on the receivers to run good routes. The colder it got the less the Pats scored. It’s due to the weather.
Unless you play in a dome you must be able to run successfully when the weather turns bad.
by StoneColdSteel on Dec 23, 2009 12:17 AM EST reply actions
Which part of '07?
The part where they went undefeated with a pass first offense outside or the part where they finally lost a game with the same offense inside in a dome.
I know this proves nothing, but it’s kind of ironic, I think.
'I’ve learned to become a flat-liner. There’s a lot out there that’ll make your heart jump if you allow it."
-Coach Tomlin
by NYSteelersFan4 on Dec 23, 2009 8:57 AM EST up reply actions
Inability to run at will
also lost that SB for NE; they couldn’t control the clock when they needed to.
Pass blocking...
Was suspect as well. There were multiple reasons they lost that game, this one was just funny to me with the way SCS worded it. I mean, he was right, to an extent, but there is always an exception.
'I’ve learned to become a flat-liner. There’s a lot out there that’ll make your heart jump if you allow it."
-Coach Tomlin
by NYSteelersFan4 on Dec 23, 2009 12:28 PM EST up reply actions
Good point
Two of the three reasons running the ball is important are weather and running down the clock. The third is to wear down a defense by (hopefully) imposing your will on it. Without at least reliability in a running game it’s hard to be in total control of a game. Remember Cowher’s record with an 11+ point lead? He won something like 116-1 when his teams led by 11 or more, mostly because he ran Bettis virtually every down and ate up tons of time.
Remember the Cowher years
I find it funny that people completely forget how predictable the Steelers’ offense was before Whisenhunt came in. It was get a lead into the fourth quarter and just ram the ball down their throats with Jerome Bettis. This was a solid strategy in the regular season and was superb against subpar teams. (Which strangely is a problem we have in the Tomlin/Arians years unfortunately) But it seemed as soon as the Steelers got into the playoffs and played teams with a good quarterback on the other side, we would collapse. John Elway did it. Tom Brady did it.
But when we got Ben, we managed to throw the ball to perfection against the Bengals, the Colts, and the Broncos. And the way the year has been going up to this point, I think it’s wise to not eat up clock. The way it has happened is that the team with the last possession decides things. That was certainly the case Sunday and I think running the ball with the intention of taking time away is dangerous, especially with that defense on the other side.
Ben is the key
I’m sure Cowher would gladly switch QB’s with Tomlin – it was a diiferent team in those days largely to compensate for poor QB play (and then when he did get a pocket passer who I will not name, the guy had a Super Bowl meltdown). But when Ben threw us to his Super Bowl it was easy to do because we were such a run-first team, and it was only in the playoff games this worked. In Super Bowl XL we won on gadget plays and a 75 yard run. And defence.
Clearly Ben allows us to win games we may not normally win. That’s why the next decade will be exciting regardless of what else happens with the team. I guess the question is does BA bring out the best in BB? And does BA bring out the best in our offence overall? It is possible that 16andcounting’s “devil’s advocate” post is right – but can all of us fans be wrong?? :)
by touchemalljoe on Dec 23, 2009 2:57 PM EST up reply actions
The Cowher Philosophy
only works if the team has a Bettis-level future-HOFer-RB who can be counted on to gain at least 10 yards every 2 or 3 downs.
That is a rare kind of back, and not a situation most coaches ever find themselves in. The only reason Brady and NE beat us in ‘04 was…..well….first- Ben hit a wall as a rookie in the AFCCG, and IMO the Patricheats had foreknowledge of Pittsburgh’s defensive play calls. Their offense was hitting wide open WRs on every pass, had RBs hitting huge holes on every run etc. etc. It was uncanny. Like they were reading Dick L.’s mind or something…
I’d be interested to know if anyone else suspected skull-duggery in that game. Every time I watch it, I can’t figure out how the Pats O was in position to beat our defense before the play. After a 15-1 season, how could the Steelers have shit the bed so badly?
/End thread-jacking attempt. Apologies.
I have always and will always think that the Pats cheated against us in the 04 game
by klompus on Dec 24, 2009 3:45 AM EST up reply actions 1 recs
think?
We know they did!! If not, why did Godell destroy the tapes? Do you really think that Belicheck turned over ALL the tapes? The league is protecting the “legitimacy” of the Pats superbowls, pure and simple! This league is rotten to the core! Ever notice, during the Pats 2007 season, during the raven game, how many times Boller was hit in the head? Not one penalty was called! How about in 2005 playoffs on Troys pick? The league wanted Manning in the superbowl for ratings! Porter was not even fined for his remarks after the game! I am sick of all these detractors saying we get all the calls!
by nycsteelerfan on Dec 24, 2009 9:47 AM EST up reply actions
I am standing by that theory, too
Clearly they taped us during the regular season game in 2004 when the defense absolutely creamed the Taperiots.
They used those tapes in the AFCCG.
"We are only going to score 17 points?"
Ive read articles suggesting it goes as far as Goodell assigning certain ref teams to the Patriots
knowing that they call more roughing the passer and pass interference penalties, i.e. the penalties the patriots win games on regularly
how about the raven game this year?
See how “tom terrific” got ALL the calls..
by nycsteelerfan on Dec 24, 2009 2:28 PM EST up reply actions
that was Ron Winters officiating crews
I forgot where you can find the stats and penalty calling % for every crew…
It's good to know my tin foil hat
isn’t the only one in SteelerNation ;-/
Its true though!
hate to say it…ravens got robbed during the Pats game this year…And, I was rooting for the Pats, for obvious reasons
by nycsteelerfan on Dec 24, 2009 7:58 PM EST up reply actions
Imposing your will means kicking the other guy's ass!!!
Run blocking is more physical, more aggressive. You double team, trap and angle block on run plays. Pass blocking is more passive. The defenders get tired aerobically when they are forced to pass rush unsuccessfully down after down. Defenders get beat up physically and mentally when you run on them. imposing your will sounds like a mental thing but it is a physical act.
You are what you do. You play like you practice. The Steelers are a different team by philosophy and practice. They are not the Cowher Steelers for better or for worse. We still don’t know exactly what Tomlin envisions when he dreams of his ideal team. He is a defensive guy with a defensive guru for a DC. He utilized BA because he was ready-made for him when he got to Pittsburgh. The next couple of years will show what he believes in philosophically. Where the FO stops and he begins is another huge question mark.
"Franz" in NoCal
I think we know
He wants the team to be like the patriots except able to run the ball better. He wants an offense that can play any type of game, air it out or pound it physically. I think he’d prefer more balance but doesn’t interject too much because offense is not his expertise. I can’t wait to see who the next OC will be.
Steelers football is 60 mins.
by tannofsteel84 on Dec 23, 2009 1:47 PM EST up reply actions
Wouldn't everyone want such a thing?
You can’t be equally good at everything. I have no problem with throwing the ball if that’s a strength you have at QB and WR. However, the O Line needs to be proficient at protection. I think 45+ sacks per year is a pretty clear indicator that this O Line is not that great at pass blocking. The inability to run the ball consistently, especially in short yardage indicates that they are not superior as a run blocking group either.
The Steelers won the SuperBowl and for that they need make no apologies. I believe that their playmakers win games for them in spite of the O Line and in spite of Arians to a lesser degree. They have so many good offensive weapons that they are explosive. Enough big plays and you score points. This season’s win total is more in line with their O Line talent than last year’s result. The tight games are not generally going their way this year.
The defense has been good for so long, we all expect a top 3 vs the run and top 5 overall as a given. If the defense is middle of the pack, they will continue losing close games with that offensive line. The defense used to be so good they could bail out the offense. Now, the offense has more of a burden. If they can keep Ben upright, they are dangerous. If not, they can’t really on a great run game to eat clock and thereby limit the opponent’s number of offensive possessions.
Tomlin’s stamp is not upon this team as yet. His leadership style and bravado are evident but his long-term strategy is yet to be seen.
"Franz" in NoCal
Personally, I think we need a more athletic O-line
Over-sized FBs with good agility and awareness to allow them to adjust to Ben’s tendency to scramble and hold the ball.
A group of lineman around 6’3-5"/280-290#‘s, with athleticism, strength and football IQ. ike Shanahan’s O-line during the Elway years. Ben makes it clear he uses Elway as a measuring stick for his style of play. Why not give him the right O-line for that style?
Chris Kemo and Willie C. are close to that type, and Starks could be if he was encouraged to trim up and focus on mobility.
Have you bothered to look at how big they are?
Starks – 6-8 345
Colon – 6-3 315
Kemo – 6-3 344
Essex – 6-4 324
Hartwig 6-4 312
None of these are small and agile. Colon especially will never be considered agile.
by Steeler Nation VA on Dec 23, 2009 8:28 PM EST up reply actions
Luckily
I’m in touch with how often I’m wrong. I stand corrected. But I still think Ben would be better off with an athletic, strong O-line than the current road-graders.
Does that make sense?
But Kemo
moves pretty well for a beast doesn’t he?
he is one of the best pulling guards in the league
Players who should be in the Hall of Fame
DIck Lebeau, Pat TIllman, Dwight White, Donnie Shell, L.C. Greenwood, Ray Guy, Steve Tasker, Greg Llyod, Andy Russel, Chris Carter and Kevin Greene
2009 Pittsburgh Steelers the Perefect Storm of Suck
Chris Henry 1983-2009 RIP
by WVPiratesfan on Dec 24, 2009 2:35 PM EST up reply actions
Something more about Arians
I’m not sure if anyone else on this site has mentioned it (if they have, I haven’t seen it), but apparently Mike Tomlin has found out Arians was talking shit behind his back to his friends and other coaches.
I can’t find a free article to read about it, but if you pay for extra on post gazette, I think this link works:
http://plus.sites.post-gazette.com/i…=58&Itemid=155
From what I know about it (without reading an official article.. just chatter) is that Jay Glazer is friends with Tomlin and Jay Glazer heard from around the way that Arians was badmouthing Tomlin, and Glazer told Tomlin. Hopefully Arians is gone no matter what
Talking about a blind spot...
I hope also that the win doesn’t not stop William Gay from being a starting corner.
offence vs. offense, eh
I probably should have noticed this sooner but up here in the Great White North we use the British English “offence” whereas yinz down there all use the American English “offense”.
So I refer to the Steelers ‘offence’ and everyone else writes ‘offense’. And since our American neighbour (or as you would write ‘neighbor’) is so much bigger and casts such a big cultural shadow over all of North America, you will see canucks who use “offense” too, but I guess I’m a traditionalist.
The same goes for “defence” and “defense”. So I love the Steelers “defence” (except for recent 4th quarter troubles of course). Hal Gill plays “defence” for the Canadiens, but used to play “defense” for the Pens.
And in school you’re probably not taught anything about the War of 1812 and we’re taught that we kicked your butts……
Empty Back Set
I finally got to watch a game with my dad this sunday and it was fun to hear what he was saying. When we ran the first empty back set by the goal line and BB got sacked I turned to my dad and said nearly every negative play we get will come from that formation. Sure enough it happened again and again and again. Yes, there were some postives. My dad says doesn’t Arians ever learn. When we lined up in the empty back set he would just laugh and look at me like jeest BA is an idiot, he’s like a small child who steals candy from a grocery store gets punished by his mom and then does it again and again and again. My dad doesn’t get to watch every game since we don’t live close to Pittsburgh and doesn’t have NFL ticket or go to the bars to watch so he watches the primetime games and the few local broadcasts we get. My guess is he has watched 5 games this year and he noticed BA continually doing what generally doesn’t work and commented on it. He even mentioned it is up to Tomlin to make a change and let BA know he has to slow down with the empty back sets. So it begs a question does Tomlin not see it doesn’t work the majority of the time or does he not want to pipe up and say something?
It is Tomlin's Job
I agree it is Tomlin’s job to manage the overall team. He either has to step up and give BA an ultimatum or suffer the fate of missing the playoffs.
Indy did not win the SB until they had a good defense and a running game to compliment their passing game. I bet they do not win this year. No running game and defense that can not get off the field.
Tomlin says he is a fan of great teams from the past (fan of history). Almost all great teams with a great passing game also had a running attack and a great defense. None also had BA as OC or an assistant coach.
by Steeler Nation VA on Dec 24, 2009 8:50 AM EST up reply actions
One Game Does Not A Decision Make
Don’t know why I went all Yoda in the subject line… However I don’t think Tomlin gives a rat’s behind about any one game, or single calls. He’s looking for people who he feels he can win with. I have no insights into Tomlin’s opinions on that, but if he thinks Arians gives the team a better chance to win than someone new and forcing the offense to learn a new system? He’ll stick with it.
I hate to beat the dead horse, but I think that consistency will win this year. Every player on offense seems to have improved this year with the exception of Mewelde Moore. Holmes is more consistent, Ben’s putting up bigger/better numbers, the o-line is certainly playing better than last year. The difference has been a thin line on 3rd downs and other high pressure situations where the Steelers have fallen short this year. So taking all that into consideration you have to believe that with one more year they will continue to gell and the group will continue to perform at a higher level. Every off-season you don’t have a new scheme to learn is time that you get to just practice and get better at the stuff you do know. Maybe add a wrinkle or two, but generally just become perfect at what you know already. The Colts scheme is a great example of that. It’s a very very simple scheme, but they run it to perfection.
by Chicago Steeler on Dec 24, 2009 9:02 AM EST reply actions
more on this topic from today's PG, BB says "Times are changin' for offense."
We know that we don’t have to be three yards and a cloud of dust! We are all about winning – we know Tomlin doesn’t walk by six rushing titles, he walks by six Lombardi trophies yada yada. So just win this Sunday, doing whatever it takes.
Maybe Townsend will turn back the clock and have a great game at corner, maybe Arians will call the kind of game we would all call if we had the reins, maybe Tyrone Carter will learn the meaning of “pursuit angle”, maybe someone will cover Rice out of the backfield, maybe we will still be in the playoff race at 4:30 pm Sunday. Let’s hope so.
Here’s the link to the article from today’s PG http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/09358/1023303-66.stm
(And I remember the 2004 game like it was yesterday, and I’m with you tobiathan. I spent the whole game thinking how could that defender be there, how did they stop that play, and that one, and the next one, and how could every play they called work so well. It was definitely uncanny – and now we know why. Oh well…..)
What fans don't understand is
That it’s not about having a run first offense. It’s about being able to be balanced when you need to be. Being able to run effectively allows you to run out the clock on a team looking to get the ball back in a late game situation.
I understand Tomlin has the “whatever it takes” mentality, but what if it takes us running the ball in a crucial situation and we can’t do it? At some point you have to address the issue, not run around it with clever quotes.
I’m not asking us to win pretty like the Colts, but I am asking for us to be effective when we need to execute the running game.
by StoneColdSteel on Dec 25, 2009 1:01 AM EST up reply actions
Technolgy
As a big of a run-game fan that Iam. I have concede to the changing times of offenses in the NFL. Running the ball is becoming or has become obsolete. Even the rules established by the NFL these days, cater to a pass oriented offense. You can barely touch a reciever for example, IMHO overly protective rules for Qb’s and quicker faster D-linemen. Not that I’m wanting Arians to stay as OC. I’m just thinking as Steeler die hards, we need to change with the times
Also I still think this O-line can bring us another Superbowl. They’re just inexperienced and young. Also I think only a handful of them have come from winning college programs. Think you’d be suprised how much that counts
Anyway, felllow Steeler Brothas and Sistas, give this new wave offense a chance. Also Ben needs to throw the ball away sometimes too. And stop being so darned greedy.
Go Steeler!

by 

















