Behind the Steel Curtain: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
New Blog: Cowboy Altitude for Wyoming Fans!

A Closer Look At The Steelers Salary Cap Situation To Better Understand The Team's Struggles In 2009

Just a conversation starter here that I'm eager to get your take on.  The subject - how the Steelers have been forced to balance out the spending they did re-signing key veterans by keeping an unusually high number of rookies and other inexperienced, low paid players on the roster. 

Let's take a look at just how much of the team's allotted salary cap has gone to paying the team's better players. The chart below shows how much more the Steelers are shelling out this year to pay their top players than they did even just a year ago. There are a myriad different variables as to why this is - and we'll get in to some of them in this post as well as in follow-up posts - but for now, let me just say that the preliminary point of this exercise is to show how the Rooneys were forced to counterbalance this reality by keeping an unusually high volume of young players (rookies in particular) on this year's roster in order to keep the balance sheets in check. This will also be the case in 2010. The hope though is that the experience gained this year by the raw young talent will pay dividends in 2010 and 2011 when the core group of key players the team's invested heavily in will still be around and capable of playing at a high enough level to lead the team towards more Super Bowl glory.

For any of you all out there who own your own business or are involved in accounting, finance, economics, or even just payroll or something else Human Resources related, you know how operations almost exclusively are run off an Excel spreadsheet. In business, you increase a profit margin a smidge here and a smidge there with calculated and clearly defined decision. In the NFL, your actions are shaped primarily by the looming annual salary cap figure - a hard cap that all teams must abide by unlike in Major League Baseball or the National Basketball Association. 

That's not to say I understand the ins and outs of how the Steelers front office is running this team based on salary figures alone. But I do feel confident saying that what we're seeing this year - that is an abundance of young pups being asked to make major contributions for a defending champion team - is a product of the pressures the organization is feeling this year and next to keep their books balanced.

Let's take a closer look.

2008 NFL Salary Cap: ~$116.7 million

2009 NFL Salary Cap:  ~$127 million

Name 2008 Cap Hit 2009 Cap Hit  +/- Delta
Ryan Clark $ 2.2 $2.4 + $.2 
James Farrior  $ 4.05 $3.98 - $.7 
Casey Hampton $ 5.4 $6.6 + $1.2
James Harrison $1.55 $ 5.75 + $4.2
Justin Hartwig $ 1.49 $ 2.23 + $.74
Chris Hoke $ 1.48 $ 1.67 + $.19
Santonio Holmes $ 1.74 $ 1.6  - $.14
Brett Keisel  $ 3.15 $ 5.0 + $1.85
Rashard Mendenhall $ 1.19 $ 1.48 + $.29
Heath Miller $ 1.7 $ 4.67 + $2.97
Mewelde Moore $ 1.1 $ 1.92 + $.81
Willie Parker $ 4.09 $ 4.53 + $.44
Troy Polamalu  $ 6.82 $ 6.49 - $.33
Jeff Reed $ 1.96 $ 1.96 $0
Ben Roethlisberger $ 7.97 $ 13.2 + $5.23
Aaron Smith $ 4.75 $ 3.95 - $.8
Ike Taylor $ 3.74 $ 5.67 + $1.93
Lawrence Timmons $ 1.75 $ 2.1 + $.35
Deshea Townsend $ 1.97 $ 2.37 + $.4
Hines Ward $ 6.7 $ 5.6 - $1.1
Max Starks $ 6.89 $ 5.5 - $1.39
Chris Kemoeatu $ 1.42 $ 2.8 + $1.38
Willie Colon $ .54 $ 2.2 + $1.66
------- ------- ------- -------
$73.65 $93.67 + $20.02

Initial Conclusion(s):

Star-divide

We'll try to go a bit deeper, but simply put, the Steelers paid a bigger slice of their yearly pie to their top players in 2009 than they did in 2008. The Salary Cap jumped about $10 million dollars from '08 to '09, yet the Steelers salary cap allotment to their 'upper crust' players jumped more than $20 million bucks. 

What does that mean? Well, lots of things I suppose, including that the front office really believes in investing in a certain core group of players.

More importantly though, it means that there were tough decisions and risks to be taken in order to fill out a complete roster that fell under the salary cap. What's the easiest way to achieve that end? By keeping a bunch of rookies and other young players in their rookie contracts. 

When you have an army of scouts as talented and ubiquitous as the Steelers organization, you can live with calculated risks like replacing a Bryant McFadden with William Gay; or hoping your young DBs fill the void left by cutting veteran special teams stalwarts like Anthony Madison. Then there's the occasional gaffe made by even the most competent front offices - like say the Kendall Simmons extension that is still costing the Steelers in 2009, more than a year after Simmons last took a snap in the Black 'N Gold. Basically, for every reaction, there's an equal and opposite reaction. In the salary-cap era of the NFL that means for every extra dollar you pay Player X, you have to find a way to pay Player Y less, or you must replace Player Y with a less expensive option, Player Z. You just have to roll the dice at times that the young Player Z is ready to perform on the big stage sooner rather than later.  

Some other thoughts about these figures. As always, please jump in and share your insights on what you see and what you think it all means in the bigger picture.

*This is why we weren't able to retain Bryant McFadden, even for the paltry sum that the Cardinals ultimately paid him. You have to make up for the dramatic increase in salary expenditures somewhere. 

*Same for Larry Foote. Did we release him because he was 'washed up'? No, no we did not. We did so because he was making too much money compared to what Lawrence Timmons and Keyaron Fox were making. Had there been some more money to work with, I guarantee you Foote gets re-signed. Perhaps some egos get damaged a bit as Dick LeBeau shuffles the talented quartet of Farrior, Timmons, Foote and Fox. But that extra experienced body would have come in handy looking back at things, no?

*By the way, this is also why Anthony Madison was originally let go. Madison, the team's top special teams ace in 2008, was released for salary cap purposes alone. The reality of it is that he was set to make close somewhere between 300-400k more than rookies like Joe Burnett, Keenan Lewis, or even 3rd year man William Gay. That's a risk the front office has to take. Said differently, you free up that extra bit of cap space to pay premium players and just hope that the youngsters come close to filling the production void left by a guy like Madison's departure. It hasn't quite worked out that way. And it certainly hasn't worked out that way (at least if you ask me) in terms of replacing McFadden with Gay for salary purposes.

*Perhaps the biggest waste of money this year - at least on a guy who's actually suiting up each week and not 'dead money' - is veteran DB Deshea Townsend. The 11 year vet has a cap value of $2.3 million this year. For what? I respect and appreciate loyalty to veterans, but in hindsight, the Steelers should have released him this summer.

*Another guy who I absolutely love but am beginning to question whether he's worth the price tag is Mewelde Moore. Last year, Moore earned just $1.1 million. This year, his cap value is just a shade under $2 million. I heart MM at the former price tag; not quite as much at the later.

*If you were wondering why Jeff Reed wasn't signed this summer, let me just say that it probably had very little to do with his proclivity to destroy towel dispensers and much more to do with the fact that he could be replaced by an unknown young kicker that our scouts liked for about 1/5 the cost - at most.  Even more money needs to be freed up to pay for guys like LaMarr Woodley and Santonio Holmes - so expect another round of retooling next year to make room for those guys our front office believes are harder to replace than guys like Reed.

*I didn't include it in the chart, but it's worth noting that Kendall Simmons is also taking up a sizable chunk of salary cap room as 'dead money'. If my figures are correct, he's taking up close to $5 million of cap space this year despite not having taken a snap in God knows how long. Again, these kinds of unforeseen circumstances require adjustments that may seem less risky or consequential on paper than they play out to be. 

I had originally decided to not post this and keep working on it until it was better written and more thoroughly thought out on my end. The idea kind of came to me just last night, and I tried to fit all this in in between finishing up my obligations for two of my final graduate school classes. There's more I'd like to say and elaborate on, but what the hell, it's 5:30 out here and I may not get a chance to get back to it for another day or so. So I'll just open it up to you all's thoughts for now, and will definitely revisit it myself soon enough.

In the meantime, perhaps this will provide a new narrative as to why the Steelers are undergoing some of the mystifying problems they're experiencing so far in the 2009 season. 

Thoughts?

3 recs  |  Comment 104 comments  |  Add comment |

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

Cap

First time poster….Thanks for the detailed and timely analysis of the Steeler Cap situation. This is the type of in depth analysis you never get from standard media like the PG. I’ve always been a fan of Colbert and Kahn and, except for rare cases like Simmons, have thought they’ve done a great job managing the salary cap while keeping the Steelers competitive. So, with these restraints, how were the Steelers able to resign Madison when they couldn’t afford him to begin with?

by SteelyJaz on Dec 9, 2009 8:52 AM EST reply actions  

well

Must admit I don’t understand every last inner working of the cap situation in the NFL. Hell, not sure anyone really does, agents included. As it relates to Madison, not sure how paying him counts – be it as a prorated amount, how it may or mat not count for the current year, how dropping a guy like A. Harrison reduces the annual cap amount, etc etc.

Safe to say though that they needed to free up the money upfront, and then later down the road were able to wriggle their way to paying him a prorated amount for a fraction of the season.

Wish I could do better.

Freel free to email me anytime at behindthesteelcurtain@gmail.com with questions, suggestions, complaints, etc, or to just say what's up. -Michael Bean (Blitz)

by Michael Bean on Dec 9, 2009 9:02 AM EST up reply actions  

I may be mistaken, but I’m pretty sure that with a guy like Madison, his initial cap number is based on his expected salary this year plus any pro-rated bonus (which he probably didn’t have any since he was mainly just a STs player). Once he’s released, only his pro-rated bonus money counts against the cap, so he could be cut and re-signed at a lower salary, which would save cap space.

For ideas on statistical analyses, email me at wolfpacksteelersfan@gmail.com.

by WolfpackSteelersFan on Dec 9, 2009 2:05 PM EST up reply actions  

i think you’re right

I'll drink your Milkshake, I'll drink it up!

by Frank Mineo (DYMS) on Dec 9, 2009 2:17 PM EST up reply actions  

Simmons

Are we still paying for him next year, or was this the last? Deshea jumped out at me right away too are far as “Man, is he overpaid”.

by SteelerFanInPatsieLand on Dec 9, 2009 8:53 AM EST reply actions  

One of the sad truths of the league

is teams win with underpaid players. Come on rookies, you need to be a lot better than your contracts if we are going to turn this around.

by Phantaskippy on Dec 9, 2009 8:58 AM EST reply actions  

Moore is worth it

The real problem is, Parker isn’t. Moore is a solid value as the #2/third down back. But he’s only the latter. Parker (in decline for three years now) is too big a hit for a guy they don’t need.

by upabob on Dec 9, 2009 9:01 AM EST reply actions  

Moore WAS worth it

We don’t win the Super Bowl last year without Mewelde Moore. He turned in several HUGE games when FWP and Mendenhall were down with injuries. It seemed every time he touched the ball he nailed a first down or a big play.
This year has been different. I like the Moore signing but must say that I have not noticed him make one big play all year long. He definitely slipped and I don’t know how you can justify him being worth 2 million this year Bob.
Had to keep FWP. He was the #1 back since 05 and Mendenhall was coming off injury and unproven. Think FW is gone after 09 off to sign a bigger contract. He was a HUGE part in 2 Lombardi’s. Led us in rushing in 05 and had the 75 yard splash in XL. The 146 he hung on SD in the playoffs in 08 was also outstanding.
On the list above I see FWP, Clark & Townsend saving them 10 million next year. Of course everyone else on this list is going up. Think they NEED to sign Snack & Colon.

When You Run The Ball Good Things Happen

by 5020 on Dec 9, 2009 9:36 AM EST up reply actions  

My God...

Did you ever imagine when starting this season that you’d say we “NEED” to sign Colon? If there’s been a bright spot this season it’s gotta be that guy.

by Chicago Steeler on Dec 9, 2009 9:38 AM EST up reply actions  

Kemo has been more consistent as well.

You sure Ike isn’t reacquainting himself with his fingers, he certainly doesn’t use them for catching. - Brian (DaBolts) on "Face Me Ike"

by steelguy99 on Dec 9, 2009 11:29 AM EST up reply actions  

Nice article

Forgot to compliment this. Good read.

by upabob on Dec 9, 2009 9:58 AM EST up reply actions  

If someone goes to IR

does that effect our cap in terms of being able to sign a replacement? That could’ve freed up some $$$ for Madison, Ivy, ect…

"Now that I'm here, I don't want to just be here, I want to be here for a long time." Hines Ward, 1998 4th round draft pick.

by kick him in the head on Dec 9, 2009 9:05 AM EST reply actions  

nope

No cap relief by placing on IR. Just frees up roster spot, no cap room….I believe, that is. That’s why you don’t shut guys down for the year unless you have to. If you could do so to free up cap room, youd see teams doing it all the time unnecessarily. My bet is that was a stipulation in some Collective Barganing Agreements that the players won out on. And it makes sense. Can’t give owners the ability to renege on their financial obligations by claiming incurable injury. You make a contract, you’re obligated to fullfill it year by year – with the one loophole being you can cut someone before a certain date in the summer to get back a portion of your investment.

Freel free to email me anytime at behindthesteelcurtain@gmail.com with questions, suggestions, complaints, etc, or to just say what's up. -Michael Bean (Blitz)

by Michael Bean on Dec 9, 2009 9:11 AM EST up reply actions  

I'm not sure

But I don’t think that is correct Blitz. I think that if a player is placed on IR their salary cap figure does then become available to resign another player. Otherwise, a team up against the cap at the beginning of the year would not be able to resign anybody to replace him.

by King Coebra on Dec 9, 2009 12:27 PM EST up reply actions  

Disregard

I guess I’m wrong from the quick research I just did. I thought the cap space was freed up but evidently it is not.

by King Coebra on Dec 9, 2009 12:30 PM EST up reply actions  

Filling a roster spot

I believe only the top 53 salaries on your roster count against the cap. So if someone goes on IR, you can sign a player at league minimum salary (assuming you have at least one player in your top 53 at minimum salary) and it doesn’t affect your salary cap. Thus, even if you start the year right up against the cap, you can still replace an injured player, at least with a rookie. Most teams leave a small amount of money open to start the season in case they want to sign a veteran or two during the season. Anyone who is not on a roster to start the season is unlikely to demand more than the minimum salary.

by Steelin on Dec 10, 2009 4:58 PM EST up reply actions  

Cap

Had heard on the radio that the NFL maybe getting rid of the salary cap. Is there any truth to this?

5 words you may never hear.."Bungals win the Super Bowl"

by KySteeler on Dec 9, 2009 9:51 AM EST reply actions  

I would HATE that!

How many Baltimore Ravens does it take to win a Super Bowl? Nobody knows and we may never find out

by Cheex on Dec 9, 2009 9:53 AM EST up reply actions  

That would allow teams like the Cowboys to becom the Yankees of the NFL, and just buy a championship

How many Baltimore Ravens does it take to win a Super Bowl? Nobody knows and we may never find out

by Cheex on Dec 9, 2009 9:53 AM EST up reply actions  

Forget the Cowboys – they’d still figure out ways to lose in the first round of the playoffs. It’s the Patriots that I’d be worried about. “I guess we don’t need to cheat anymore now that we can just buy a Lombardi! Open your checkbook Bob!”

by SteelerFanInPatsieLand on Dec 9, 2009 11:03 AM EST up reply actions  

Exactly

The Taperiots have lately been signing big names. No salary cap will only mean signing bigger names, without fear of having less money.

by Han on Dec 9, 2009 12:35 PM EST up reply actions  

Haha...

I love it when predominant opinion is not backed up at all by the facts.

Full disclosure, I am a Yankees fan. And I feel like they do spend too much money. But buying championships (even figuritively, which is what I know you meant) is just not accurate.

'I’ve learned to become a flat-liner. There’s a lot out there that’ll make your heart jump if you allow it."
-Coach Tomlin

by NYSteelersFan4 on Dec 9, 2009 12:32 PM EST up reply actions  

mee too!

I am a yankee fan also, and agree that a salary is needed in baseball AND football..I should be a “soft” cap…to your your OWN players…the ones drafted by that team should NOT count against the cap..

by nycsteelerfan on Dec 9, 2009 2:04 PM EST up reply actions  

Disagree NY

The Yankees are everything that’s wrong with baseball. They may not have bought championships during their recent prolonged drought, however, what they did manage to buy during all those trophy-less seasons, was a ticket to the dance. I agree that the Cowboys would likely find a way to screw things up year after year, but what are the chances that free spending would put them in a situation to be in the play-off mix every year? I would answer – Excellent. The Yankees have been there just about every year and finally were able to win it this year.
The Pirates situation should make it perfectly clear to all of us Steeler fans just how damaging a capless future will be to our chances. With Colbert and company in place, we’d likely be better off than many other teams, but best case scenario likely has us turning into the Minnesota Twins of the NFL…….competing every other year because of brilliant management and planning, but lacking the full financial toolbox to get over the top rope.
The thing I find incredibly hard to believe – the have-not teams out there are willing to let this happen? This will, quite simply, destroy the league as we know it. The NFL would quickly become MLB.
Sorry Yankee fan – I enjoy cheering for a franchise that has a tradition of excellence, just like it that much more that we get to have a level playing field and rely on our managerial and scouting excellence rather than only getting a play-off run about as often as the Browns, the Bengals, the Falcons…..etc…. .

by SteelerNorth on Dec 9, 2009 2:57 PM EST up reply actions  

I don't totally disagree with you actually...

Like I said, I don’t like the spending, and I fully recognize the damge it has done to the league. Look at the USFL… it could happen to the NFL too.

I disagree with the term “buying championships”. It’s just not accurate. If you want to say “buying competitiveness” okay that’s fully accurate. Even if you wanted to say “buying competitiveness at the cost of other teams” I can dig that, it’s true.

But, how can you say we wouldn’t just spend too? I mean, we are right up against the allowed spending, are we not? If it is the preconceived notion we don’t spend money or that we’re cheap, that’s flat out wrong. We spend just as much as we can, who’s to say we wouldn’t spend more too?

'I’ve learned to become a flat-liner. There’s a lot out there that’ll make your heart jump if you allow it."
-Coach Tomlin

by NYSteelersFan4 on Dec 10, 2009 5:16 PM EST up reply actions  

Profit Sharing

I don’t think it was the removal of the salary cap but the ending the profit sharing agreement between owners. I believe that this was voted on and approved by the NFL owners. I think this is a huge mistake and will cause the downfall of at least 2-4 franchises… (Jacksonville and Buffalo jump out)

by kashmir772 on Dec 9, 2009 10:20 AM EST up reply actions  

The profit sharing was cut by the league not the Owners

and it is only a fraction of the profit sharing. There is an extra 150 mil in the profit sharing that allows small market teams to “write covered checks” whenever they want, and only about 4-6 teams even used it this year. It is a contingency supplemental of the CBA and with the CBA expiring, it was turned off until the CBA is renewed.

"The superior man blames himself. The inferior man blames others." Don Shula

by SteelCage on Dec 10, 2009 4:50 AM EST up reply actions  

Thanks Blitz!

Very insightful, and I think that goes to show why we have the best fans and also probably the best Blog Boss out there! I bet the other mod’s and whatnot are nice or whatever, I just know I didn’t like the Baltimore Beatdown guys, no class, especially with the threatening to ban JohnnyS over his spat with Baltimore Warrior, whereas Warrior was being a total and utter douche, and I don’t see you, like Mr Malor, taunting them the way he did with us after the painful Raiders loss. But okay just a little venting…

What interesed me most on the Salary Cap of the Steelers (by the way I love the fact the NFL has it, I hate the Baseball unfair payroll and the weird ass NBA “soft” salary cap with all it’s loopholes) how come some core guys have a – delta, whilst some totally obsolete players have a incremental, yet important if you add them all up,pay raise? I understand decreasing your core guys for the sake of other talents but why let it go to waste on someone like Simmons? Or Townsend?

How many Baltimore Ravens does it take to win a Super Bowl? Nobody knows and we may never find out

by Cheex on Dec 9, 2009 9:52 AM EST reply actions  

Actually...

What I said was dumb they couldn’t really oversee those guys being letdowns, it’s the risk you take

How many Baltimore Ravens does it take to win a Super Bowl? Nobody knows and we may never find out

by Cheex on Dec 9, 2009 9:58 AM EST up reply actions  

Call me a curmudgeon but . . .

This is why the overall quality of NFL teams (but not players) continues to decline.

When you’re making so many personnel decisions based on bucks instead of your team’s needs, a lot of bad things can happen. I think that’s probably why Chuck Noll decided to retire when he did. He could see the dawn of the “prima donna era.”

They ought to change the name of pro football to “moneyball” because that’s what it really is today. Unfortunately, this trend is only going to get worse as time goes by. I can imagine, for example, that players in the future will win the right to sell their services on a per-game basis to any team in the league. Now won’t that be fun?

by Billy52 on Dec 9, 2009 10:27 AM EST reply actions  

Bexpo

Noll had to retire because it was time for him to get on with his life’s work. Great coach in his era but it was time to go.

by Bexpo on Dec 9, 2009 11:45 AM EST up reply actions  

Elaborate on what Delta is, plaease?

You have to hate losing more than you love winning.

by Mr MaLoR on Dec 9, 2009 10:30 AM EST reply actions  

Nevermind

You have to hate losing more than you love winning.

by Mr MaLoR on Dec 9, 2009 10:30 AM EST up reply actions  

Hey MaLoR

What the heck was that weird game all about on Monday night? Still not sure what happened to you guys out there. What a mess…

by Steelfrog on Dec 9, 2009 10:35 AM EST up reply actions  

I wish

At least you guys have the lead going into the 4th quarter and then lose it. We just lose it from the opening kickoff.

You have to hate losing more than you love winning.

by Mr MaLoR on Dec 9, 2009 12:01 PM EST up reply actions  

What a mess is right

Worst performance I have seen all year.

You have to hate losing more than you love winning.

by Mr MaLoR on Dec 9, 2009 12:01 PM EST up reply actions  

I know I'm gonna catch flak for this

But I would rather have it like last year every time. Ravens and Steelers fighting it out for AFC North (and ultimately AFC) domination. Two hardnosed defensive teams playing it out till the last snap. I’ll take the Ravens over the Bungles as our division rivals any day. At least it’s an organisation I can respect. I just LOVE to hate the Ravens!!!

by Steelfrog on Dec 9, 2009 12:41 PM EST up reply actions  

No flak

I respect honest opinions.

You have to hate losing more than you love winning.

by Mr MaLoR on Dec 9, 2009 6:55 PM EST up reply actions  

Not from you, dumbass!

From hardcore RavenHatin’ Steelers fans…

by Steelfrog on Dec 9, 2009 10:34 PM EST up reply actions  

Was the dumbass neccessary?

You have to hate losing more than you love winning.

by Mr MaLoR on Dec 9, 2009 10:48 PM EST up reply actions  

ahh...

…You’re sensitive! In french we say qui aime bien chatie bien which means vaguely- he who likes you the best gives you the most grief- I would never have said that if I had really thought that you were dumb. I take it from reading you that you are both intelligent and graced with a good sense of humor. So take no offense, friend rival, because none was meant!

by Steelfrog on Dec 10, 2009 12:24 AM EST up reply actions  

You have alot to learn young padiwan

My sarcasm seems too powerful for you.

You have to hate losing more than you love winning.

by Mr MaLoR on Dec 10, 2009 12:42 AM EST up reply actions  

Hahaha!

The Strange Ways of Charm City I know not!

by Steelfrog on Dec 10, 2009 9:21 AM EST up reply actions  

General thoughts

Thanks for the great post Blitz, I respect the work you put into it. A couple of things that jump out at me, none of them directed at your analysis. Let me say this first: hindsight is 20/20, but I’m going to go at it anyway.

Number one: It’s easy to say that Deshea should have been released (and looking back, he isn’t worth the money we pay him now), but after letting BMac go, I thought it was the right thing to do at the time. Maybe the coaches should have seen it coming through camp and preseason evaluation, but the real problem is having a contract that increases as the player gets closer to retirement. I thought they didn’t do those anymore, the last year is supposed to be lower to compensate for dwindling skills and make the player more appealing to keep. I Don’t get this one.

Second, how huge was the whole Oline contract megablunder in 07 and 08?! Mahan and Simmons should never have been signed, we could have used that money on resigning Starks to an extension and saved millions. I’m pretty sure Chukky Okobi would have been just as good (or should I say bad?) as Mahan as a stopgap until we signed Hartwig and we would have saved a ton of money on Starks who could have been signed for much less at the time. Hindsight once again, of course…

Third, MeMo is worth the money in my opinion. It’s Ratliff I don’t understand. To me it’s either him or Deshea as a veteran presence to help break the rookies in. Why both? Makes no sense to me. Plus the guy couldn’t tackle, seems like the opposite of what coach Lebeau usually wants out of a guy… That spot should have been Madison’s.

Last, Travis Kirshke. I like the guy, but he’s old and banged up and he costs us a fortune. We just drafted a DE in the first round, we have a younger veteran in Nick Eason and another promising rookie (who lost precious developmental time in Carolina following his release) in Sunny Harris. Why keep the old geezer? Sure we were glad he was around when Aaron Smith went down, but even then he’s missed time with injuries. Damaged goods not worth a multimillion contract in my humble opinion.

by Steelfrog on Dec 9, 2009 10:32 AM EST reply actions  

Good points

I agree with your assessment on #1. When the deal was done, Townsend looked like a necessity. His ability to play safety gave him some additional appeal.

I can forgive the “megablunder” of 07. Not so sure about 08.

MeMo is getting paid what we should have paid last year. Sure, we might be paying him a little extra this year, but we stole him last year. He earned that money last year, we’re just late on our payments.

To a lesser extent, I think we’re also paying Kirschke for the work he’s already put in. More importantly, good 3-4 DEs are not dime a dozen and both of our starters are aging veterans. Without Kirschke, we’d have a single non-rookie back-up. Hood has turned out well, but he could have been a bust. Harris is still an unproven player. It’s true that Kirschke has been injured, but what if that same injury had been on Brett Kiesel?

by Varmint on Dec 9, 2009 1:45 PM EST up reply actions  

Thanks

1-Whatever happened to transitioning Townsend to safety, I wonder? I’m pretty sure he would be at least as good as Mundy at the position, yet we haven’t seen him take a snap there…

2-Good one about MeMo… I like it, late payment! I still think we need him back there. Running backs take a pounding and having a good one like him around is worth the money.

3- Concerning your counterpoint, by the last cuts, they knew they had a player in Ziggy. And in today’s NFL, one veteran backup and a first round pick should be enough depth for two positions…

by Steelfrog on Dec 9, 2009 3:46 PM EST up reply actions  

To your first point

I am writing a paper dealing with contracts and what I have found out is that alot of contracts are being backloaded meaning the large portion of the contract is being paid in the last years of the contract. This allows the team to either restructure the deal or cut the player before having to pay them the large sums of money.

I’ve used this website to get some of my informatons that may be able to help explain how this all works-http://www.askthecommish.com/salarycap/faq.asp.

by redmik on Dec 10, 2009 1:33 AM EST up reply actions  

I have no issue with balancing the roster with lower cost young players, but that’s no excuse for their special teams play — one of the most glaring weaknesses from this group. These guys should be thankful that the economics of the NFL provide an opportunity while some quality veterans get unfairly priced out (ie Madison). Harrison is the ultimate example of a player taking an opportunity on ST and building an impressive career. I don’t expect every gunner to turn into a defensive MVP, but if some of these guys are so unable to cut it on ST I’ve got to at least wonder about their drive and professionalism. Shame on the many veterans too for not bringing this group up to the Steelers high standard.

by chicos_pants on Dec 9, 2009 10:54 AM EST reply actions  

It’s hard to criticize the team for cap management when we have as much or more talent than any other team in the league.

I think the one thing you can criticize them for is that when you let McFadden go you’re gambling on Troy staying healthy to keep the secondary from becoming a total mess. That’s a dicey risk given his injury history and obviously it’s a bet that we’ve lost.

by Steelers in XLIV on Dec 9, 2009 11:33 AM EST reply actions  

Bexpo

Hampton, Reed and Parker are gone due to contract issue. I would only sign Hampton with a significant pay decrease because his skill have diminished significantly. Farrior needs to take a pay cut and a reduction of playing time to 1st and 2nd down or cut him. His skills have headed south are down this year (along with Hampton). Townsend got to go. Also, the rest of the DB’s on this team need to go on Polamalu’s training program. They look like musclebound inflexible stiffs out there trying to make athletic plays. In hindsight letting McFadden go was a huge mistake – I would have cut Townsend (or Farrior for that fact) any day to make room for McFadden on the roster.

by Bexpo on Dec 9, 2009 11:55 AM EST reply actions  

Just some of my thoughts Blitz

A lot of this rides on what occurs with the cap next year, I am sure you are aware of that. It would be a huge debacle if there was no salary cap, but not as bad as the extent that everyone believes. There are a lot of odd situations that people don’t know about (i.e. players drafter after 2005 will not become UFAs and each team will get more tags, etc.).

Anyway, I think there is definitely some room to be had if there is a salary cap for us. My thoughts:

  • Cut FWP (or force him to restructure for the minimum), cut Deshea, Cut Moore or restructure
  • Force Farrior to take less, because he is not producing at that rate
  • Hampton. If we can get at a NT in the draft we could pay him a lot less than Casey will be looking for.
  • Bye bye Jeff Reed, we are paying waaaay to much for that side show

Wall of Shame
-"I’m glad we play Pitt twice, and not Tenn this year." - Brownie's Year
-"BB is ok (slightly overated)…but he is NO Kyle Orton! I’ll take Kyle over Ben any day" - Bronco_Fan_Tom
-PIT 24 KC 27
-Mike Tomlin's idea of "Unleashing Hell"

by Johnny_S on Dec 9, 2009 12:05 PM EST reply actions  

Why get another NT?

Isn’t Ziggy a NT, or is he more of a DE type player?

You have to hate losing more than you love winning.

by Mr MaLoR on Dec 9, 2009 12:07 PM EST up reply actions  

He is a DE

Too small for NT I believe. Unless he gets on the Hampton diet, I don’t think it would work out.

Wall of Shame
-"I’m glad we play Pitt twice, and not Tenn this year." - Brownie's Year
-"BB is ok (slightly overated)…but he is NO Kyle Orton! I’ll take Kyle over Ben any day" - Bronco_Fan_Tom
-PIT 24 KC 27
-Mike Tomlin's idea of "Unleashing Hell"

by Johnny_S on Dec 9, 2009 12:10 PM EST up reply actions  

Hampton diet

He makes Kobiyashi look like Nicole Richie.

You have to hate losing more than you love winning.

by Mr MaLoR on Dec 9, 2009 12:17 PM EST up reply actions  

As long as we’re invoking hindsight, sure would have been nice to sign Darren Sharper when he was available and at a pretty cheap rate.

by pghnorthside on Dec 9, 2009 12:11 PM EST reply actions  

Agree

NO is one of the few teams in the NFL that seems able to legitimately build a contender from free agents. Their drafting (except receivers) has been less than impressive, but their free agents have panned out well.

by CarlWeathersMustache on Dec 9, 2009 12:13 PM EST up reply actions  

What is needed next

I appreciate the quality work in this, but I also want to see the numbers from this year to next (if someone has that much time). That will affect what we do with guys like Farrior.

FWP, Ryan Clark, and Jeff Reed will all be gone because they have expiring contracts, which means no cap hits. It is a guy like Farrior who is interesting. If Steelers have cap room next year, Farrior will stay because if you cut him he still counts a portion against the cap. However, if Steelers are hard against the cap and think Fox can replace Farrior, they may ask Farrior to take a pay cut or release him (thus taking a cap hit to save some more money for signings/extensions).

by CarlWeathersMustache on Dec 9, 2009 12:12 PM EST reply actions  

McFadden

It was a tough cut to make, but he’s still getting paid 5 mil a year (almost as much as Ike) so you can see why they went with a cheap Willie Gay.

Also there’s this: http://fifthdown.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/04/11/scientific-football-cornerback-and-receiver-statistics/

by 13thieves on Dec 9, 2009 12:21 PM EST reply actions  

I should mention

that I certainly don’t think Gay was the #1 shut down corner last year (did I even need to say that?) and while I consider myself a Sabermetrics guy with regards to baseball, the football counterpart is still in need of work.

by 13thieves on Dec 9, 2009 12:29 PM EST up reply actions  

Thanks so much Blitz

this is fascinating.

"The standard of expectation does not change." - Mike Tomlin

by momma rollett on Dec 9, 2009 12:29 PM EST reply actions  

Chiming in..thanks Blitz

Your timing is great, I was just starting to be curious about the cap and the affect on personnel. Thanks to all the other posters here..I learn a lot from the conversations, more than on other Steeler blogs I have read.

Here’s something…mind you, Ben is valuable and worth his money. But didn’t T. Brady or P Manning give back some money at one point to make sure the team had room to be stocked with strategically important guys? And of course its easy to ask someone else to give up some cash when none of my dimes are in question.

Or is his deal already structured to alleviate impact on the cap?

by Twell on Dec 9, 2009 12:51 PM EST reply actions  

No they couldn't do that

Teh CBA states you cannot restucture to reduce the OVERALL VALUE of the contract. This is to protect the players from signing with a team for a bloated contract and then being forced to take a paycut in year two because the team already has them, so why pay them. the Dan Snyder’s of the league would screw players to save face. what can be done, ala Brady, Manning and teh Bus, is converting some of the salary to a cash bonus that gets prorated over the remaing years of the extention. For instance, Manning is going to make 14 million plus his 7 million dollar portion of his original bonus for a cap hit of 21 mil in the final year of his contract. They extend him for 5 years and take the 14 and say the salary will be 4 mil, we pay you 10 now and it counts as 2 mil each year towards his cap hit. That would mean his cap hit was then the original 7 mil bonus + 4 mil salary + 2 mil new extention bonus = 13 mil for an 8 mil savings (the numbers are made up to simplify)

"The superior man blames himself. The inferior man blames others." Don Shula

by SteelCage on Dec 10, 2009 5:32 AM EST up reply actions  

Secondary & special teams slippage main reason for slide

I think a perfect storm of things happened to where the Steelers are on the outside looking in. For one thing, the secondary has plain and simply collapsed without Troy. There is no other way to put it out. Farrior’s play has slipped and without Troy, Foote, McFadden, & Aaron Smith, this D is just nowhere near the same. Add in declining play from Ryan Clark, Ike Taylor and Farrior, and you have a D that has given up leads in five of 6 losses in the 4th Q.

I know I have to let this go, but the Steelers secondary against the Raiders was probably the worst I’ve seen a secondary play in a couple of years. When Tom Cable goes into a game and tells you that he feels his WR’s have a distinctive advantage over the Steelers corners (and the Raiders have nothing at WR), I think that tells you a lot about the state of affairs in the Steelers secondary.

Gay NEVER made a play on the ball the whole afternoon. Has he made a play on the ball the whole season? The first 4 passes thrown his way were completions (many on 3rd downs) and he wasn’t contesting any of them because he was slipping on the field.

Ike’s level of play has been going downhill all season. He has no interest in tackling, can’t make a play on the ball and can’t even know the ball away now. The STeelers have to look at whether Ike’s play is worth his projected salary for next year.

I would be very disappointed in Tomlin if he doesn’t get the rookie CBs in the game to at least see if they will compete and try to make a play. I’m pretty disgusted with Ike and Gay to this point because the front 7 has mostly played winning football and the offense is clearly better than a year ago.

The Steelers tried to save some money with A. Madison (I think he had a $1.2M salary as a restricted free agent) and it came back to bite them. The Ratliff and S. McDonald signings were probably the worst Colbert has had since he was with the Steelers, but at least both were one-year minimum level deals. That money given to K. Simmons was a panic move that is still reverberating.

In other words, DaTruth is just bitter about a season gone bad. Damn, even the food I eat isn’t as enjoyable as it once was, and it’s the same food. OK, I feel a little bit better now. Peace, All.

by datruth4life on Dec 9, 2009 12:58 PM EST reply actions  

Insightful as always datruth.

One question though: Do you think Foote should have been extended instead of Farrior? At this point, that looks like the case – a Timmons/Foote combination (with Foote wearing the radio) would compliment each others skills much better than Farrior/Timmons.

by BluegrassSteeler on Dec 9, 2009 6:45 PM EST up reply actions  

is this another excuse for the bad luck lately?

I think generally, after a Super Bowl win, the big players are going to be given more money, which means it will have to come from somewhere. I was surprised to see, if these numbers are accurate, that Farrior, Troy, and Hines actually took pay cuts this year.
It’s probably true that some adjustments had to be made, however the Steelers did not get rid of anyone who was a big enough to bring home the bacon, sotospeak.

I would like to see a comparison of rookie draftees across the league, since you gave such an emphasis to the number of them on our roster. Did we pick up that much more than other teams? Also, for the most part, our rookies have performed exceedingly, with the exception of Mike Wallace (why is a person who can’t catch a WR?). Stephan Logan just had an 83 return, which resembles his performance during the pre-season. Although on average he fair catches or gets 10ish yards. I am hoping to see Redzone Redman back on the field where he should have been the whole season!!! These recent injuries will force Tomlin to switch up the roster a bit. We will see where it goes.

"God blessed me with the talent I have." - Deebo

by steelersgrl on Dec 9, 2009 1:01 PM EST reply actions  

Mike Wallace & Redman

Better check your stats there. Wallace has been the best of the bunch and Logan is averaging somewhere in the 20s on KO returns.

The only managing Ben does is he manages to WIN games

by chewiesteeler on Dec 9, 2009 1:11 PM EST up reply actions  

Wallace can't catch?

Your comments said Wallace can’t catch and implied he’s our worst rookie. Is that a typo? Wallace has been outstanding as the #3 receiver. As a rookie!

by upabob on Dec 9, 2009 1:13 PM EST up reply actions  

Redman?

Not again! Please!!! Would you have him start in front of Mendenhall? And which Wallace are you talking about? He’s been amazing!

Do us a favor and monitor the TJ Duckett and Lecharles Bentley situation, it’ll keep you busy!

by Steelfrog on Dec 9, 2009 3:56 PM EST up reply actions  

ARE THEY AVAILABLE?

The only managing Ben does is he manages to WIN games

by chewiesteeler on Dec 9, 2009 4:29 PM EST up reply actions  

there was no comparison of Redman and Mendenhall above :)

I stand by my comment about Wallace. I did not only imply, I will tell you, of the rookies on the field, he is our worst.

"God blessed me with the talent I have." - Deebo

by steelersgrl on Dec 10, 2009 9:39 AM EST up reply actions  

Don't cut Reed!

To save money. (if he continues to be a doofus, that’s worth evaluating). Teams in the NFL consistently cut kickers to save a few bucks. And very often, they suffer for it.

Pittsburgh tried this with the ‘Chris Jacke for Norm Johnson’ experiment a few years ago.

And the Ravens would be right there with the Bengals for the division title with Matt Stover kicking, instead of that rookie hack they signed on the cheap (and have cut). Good kickers are worth every penny in the NFL. Especially to a team like the Steelers, who play a lot of close games.

Remember Kris Brown trying to make field goals at Heinz Field before we got Reed?

Pittsburgh had better have a solid replacement lined up if they dump Reed because of salary cap issues.

by upabob on Dec 9, 2009 1:17 PM EST reply actions  

Cap numbers vary

according to how their deals are structured – the number of years, annual salary, signing bonus & performance bonus (if any). The team negotiates according to what they think the player is worth, and by what they need to stay under the cap. Players are typically most interested in “guaranteed money” since total contract values are not guaranteed payouts.
While I would never claim to be an expert, what appears to be “pay cuts” for some folks (Holmes, Polamalu) most likely represents how their bonuses were paid out, i.e. last year’s compensation included bonus & salary while this year’s may only be salary or salary and a smaller portion of their total signing bonus.
In other words, don’t feel bad for ‘em or think they’re taking one for the team.

by lamarr_the_BEAST! on Dec 9, 2009 1:23 PM EST reply actions  

Keep Snack & Reed, extend Santonio, Woodley & perhaps Colon

The Steelers should probably give Snack and Reed franchise tags and then work on extending Santonio, Woodley and maybe even Willie Colon.

The franchise tag for Snack wouldn’t be much more than his cap number for this year and I don’ t think that you let Jeff Reed walk unless you have someone better waiting to take his place. A franchise tag for a kicker isn’t much either. As experience has shown us, not everyone can kick in Heinz Field.

And also, time to ink our coach to a 5-year extension. He deserves it, despite the team’s play this year. I am still interested to see how he handles the team during these last four games, particularly if he’s willing to sit down players that aren’t get it done. I think the front office knows its time for this Steelers team to get younger and began the process with this year’s rookie class. I expect that churning process to continue next year to get the team ready for its second window of opportunity while we still have Harrison, Troy, Ben, and others in their prime.

by datruth4life on Dec 9, 2009 1:30 PM EST reply actions  

im with u somewhat...

i agree we shouldve dropped deshea townsend… the guy has been virtually useless this year and definitely not worth the money. i was also skeptical when we gave brett keisel an extension, but i will gladly eat my words as he’s been great this year… although i am concerned about what happens in the later years of his contract- he might become another old vet like townsend taking up more money than he’s worth.
but at least in larry foote’s case if i remember correctly he asked to be released because he was losing playing time to timmons anyway so i dont think we wouldve resigned him to any extent but i wouldve loved to keep him for another year and keep our rotation going with him timmons and farrior. i really think farrior could use a rest every now and then so he could be fresher, not to mention timmons is versatile enough to rotate with harrison and woodley too if need be.

looking forward im extremely skeptical about resigning santonio… yes he’s shown great promise and did win us a superbowl. but im afraid we might overpay him just because of that great catch. he still hasnt had, and doesnt look like he will have this year, a 1000 yard season and we have wallace and sweed with probably much sweeter contracts. -and no i havent given up on sweed yet…
woodley is a must keep. no questions.
im also really worried about what we’ll do about hampton… im not sure if ziggy can play nose tackle and it doesnt look like there will be anyone cheaper in free agency. so we might have to keep him… but again we might have to overpay for an older vet that could turn ugly in later years

by steel.curtain.number2 on Dec 9, 2009 4:14 PM EST reply actions  

Pretty sure Tone is on pace to get > 1,000 this season

Check it out.

The only managing Ben does is he manages to WIN games

by chewiesteeler on Dec 9, 2009 4:31 PM EST up reply actions  

Yeah, Tone is right on the cusp

He has 987 yards so far this season. Expect him to break 1000 next game. If Hines can get back for at least a couple games, we should have two WRs with 1000 yards this season.

For ideas on statistical analyses, email me at wolfpacksteelersfan@gmail.com.

by WolfpackSteelersFan on Dec 9, 2009 5:26 PM EST up reply actions  

disagree about Tone bigtime

He’s been so money all year. Really continued to develop nicely. Been one of the more consistent players all year.

Freel free to email me anytime at behindthesteelcurtain@gmail.com with questions, suggestions, complaints, etc, or to just say what's up. -Michael Bean (Blitz)

by Michael Bean on Dec 9, 2009 5:45 PM EST up reply actions  

No. 1 WR's don't grow on tree these days in the NFL ...

And Hines is closer to the end than he is to the beginning. Having Holmes, Wallace, H. Hiller, & Mendy for the long-term means that Ben will have some weapons to work with while in his prime. It is a lot easier to find a good 3rd or 4th WR than it is a no. 1 WR. And can we all stop with the Limas Sweed talk? The dude has shown no potential at being an NFL WR, none. He’s closer to being cut than he is to making a big play catching the ball. I wouldn’t be surprised if Tyler Grisham proves to be a more reliable target and better WR than Sweed the rest of this year.

I think Hampton is a must resign, even if it is one year. I still think the Steelers should draft NT Dan Williams from Tennessee if he is available to have Hampton’s eventual replacement in the fold. At least getting Ziggy and Sunny Harris in this draft was big, so that next year they can get rid of the N. Eason’s and Travis Kirscke’s of the world and try to solve the DL deficiencies instead of using bandages.

Definitely disappointed in the record and this year’s slide, but this team still has a lot of quality young talent going forward.

by datruth4life on Dec 9, 2009 6:03 PM EST up reply actions  

Sweed?

I’m a little lost at how you say he has shown no potential. Has he not proven he has the ability to get open down the field, create seperation, and he runs decent routes. Usually that is the toughest part to translate from the college game to the NFL.

by redmik on Dec 10, 2009 1:40 AM EST up reply actions  

....but he can't catch the ball once he gets open

Running great routes is one thing but he has to make the catch when it is thrown his way……and this is where he has been disappointing.

by EasternShoreSteeler on Dec 10, 2009 12:40 PM EST up reply actions  

Wow the anti-Townsend sentiment!

I understand and agree that it may be time for Deshea to get on with his life’s work, but HOLY COW, does everyone have to be so harsh? My gosh, the guy has been a solid contributor to the Steelers for a long time. Anyone realize he came in the same year as Ward? Is this how all of you people are going to treat Hines when it is apparent that the game is just a bit too fast for him? Tone it down people. How about maybe some praise for the guy before you backhand him out the door with yesterdays trash.

The only managing Ben does is he manages to WIN games

by chewiesteeler on Dec 9, 2009 4:36 PM EST reply actions  

We should be content and exuberant to have a player who can’t play at the level necessary for success?

I agree Deshea has done a lot for this franchise and has been very instrumental in both SB wins….I’ll send him a thank you note as I welcome the new guy who can do his job better than him.

I'll drink your Milkshake, I'll drink it up!

by Frank Mineo (DYMS) on Dec 10, 2009 10:57 AM EST up reply actions  

agree

Just becuase he once was a contributor doesn’t mean he should have a secure roster spot. If there is another player that can get it done then that player should have the spot.

by EasternShoreSteeler on Dec 10, 2009 12:42 PM EST up reply actions  

A couple thoughts

I agree with you somewhat chewie, that it seems we’re piling on Townsend some here. His play may have declined, but every player does age. Nobody predicted that he would decline to the point of struggling as a nickel back.

As far as all of the Gay vs. McFadden rhetoric going on here: There is honestly no reason to expect that McFadden wouldn’t also be having a down year with Troy out so much, especially considering how he’s looked in AZ so far this season. I mean, from what I’ve read everyone seems to assume that he’d be the next coming of Rod Woodson if the FO could only have re-signed him this year. I just don’t see how certain anyone can be that he’d be so much better than Gay has been.

Also, Blitz, what do you mean by “paltry sum?” McFadden’s getting $5M a year in Arizona, which I believe is about what the Steelers offered him. You make it sound like the Cards got him for the vet minimum or just $1-2M a year. The Steelers wanted a longer deal (like 4-5 years) at (IIRC) around $5M/yr. Drew Rosenhaus said he was an $8M/yr player. So, he left to show his wares for a shorter deal, expecting his BIG PAYDAY after 2010. I just think that the Steelers FO made a choice that teams make every year. Just like the Pats let Lawyer Milloy, Ty Law, and Asante Samuel walk, the Steelers did the same here.

Anyway, overall, a great post.

For ideas on statistical analyses, email me at wolfpacksteelersfan@gmail.com.

by WolfpackSteelersFan on Dec 9, 2009 5:40 PM EST reply actions  

you make good points

I just think it was dumb to let a guy you drafted in the 2bd round and developed walk when he’s in the primer of his career. I say that so strongly in BMacs case because I felt there was a small window here in 2009 and 2010 where the defense could potentially be very, very strong while guys like Snack, A. Smith, Farrior were still playing at a relatively high level. But working in low round draft picks at corner have consequences and we’re seeing that. THat’s not to say I’m so positive McFadden would be doing tons better than Gay w/o Polamalu, but I do think he’d be better for sure.

Freel free to email me anytime at behindthesteelcurtain@gmail.com with questions, suggestions, complaints, etc, or to just say what's up. -Michael Bean (Blitz)

by Michael Bean on Dec 9, 2009 5:49 PM EST up reply actions  

I just think it was dumb to let a guy you drafted in the 2bd round and developed walk when he’s in the primer of his career

I would agree with that statement wholeheartedly if I believed that was what the Steelers did. I think that they made a legitimate offer that was commensurate with what he had shown to that point. He (or more to the point, his agent) rejected that offer. I would also agree more with that thought if he had been a starter for more than half a season. It’s clearly dumb to let a player go when he’s been a multi-year starter nearing the end of his first contract. It’s also dumb to offer a guy elite money when he couldn’t beat out Deshea for 3 years, and then in his first year as a starter, he’s hurt half the season. I know, the Cards didn’t offer him elite money, but I guess the Steelers weren’t willing to give him a two year deal. I would have preferred that myself, but for whatever reason, they chose not to. I rather think the reason may be that other just as deserving players were willing re-up for longer deals (Heath, for example). That raises another issue to be considered there. Which other key deals wouldn’t have gotten done if they signed McFadden? My guess is that they thought it worthwhile to lose those chances for a 4-5 year deal with B-Mac, but not for a two year deal.

For ideas on statistical analyses, email me at wolfpacksteelersfan@gmail.com.

by WolfpackSteelersFan on Dec 9, 2009 9:07 PM EST up reply actions  

You don't let good CBs leave in their prime & it not come back to bite U

You think the Skins would like to rethink that deal with Denver where they traded Portis for Champ Bailey? I think the bigger problem is that McFadden wanted to be paid more than Palomula on this team and the Steelers just weren’t going to let that happen.

Gay is a free safety who is afraid he’s going to get beat deep on every play. Townsend is just done. The Steelers just kept him a year too long. I think Ike & Ryan Clark are declining. Time to get some fresh blood here in the secondary.

by datruth4life on Dec 9, 2009 6:08 PM EST reply actions  

Agreed about the fresh blood

I think that’s why they drafted Burnett and Lewis, don’t you?

For ideas on statistical analyses, email me at wolfpacksteelersfan@gmail.com.

by WolfpackSteelersFan on Dec 9, 2009 9:08 PM EST up reply actions  

?

How much money did we save cutting Anthony Smith? He’s got two picks in four games in Jacksonville. Lack of depth at safety definitely lost us one game when we forced Carter to play injured, and may have lost us more by causing Troy to be rushed back too soon.

by buddytoledo on Dec 9, 2009 8:19 PM EST reply actions  

good points but

i think you’re stretching it a lil bit.

for example we did not cut madison because of 300-400k. we cut him because we had 2 rookie CB’s with potential we just drafted, 3 “decent” vet CBs, and kewain ratliff (who i’m guessing outperformed him in the secondary & not special teams). no room on our roster for 6 cb’s, especially when we have one for a kr/pr and 4 safeties.

yes foote was making a lot and probably refused to take a salary cut, hence why he was cut. BUT the real reason why he refused that salary cut wasn’t about the lost money (he knew he’d lose some when cut and signed with another team). he wanted to start. and he knew he probably wasnt going to continue to start over a player we drafted in the 1st rd 2 years ago.

townsend isn’t doing very well this year and isn’t doing enough to get paid what he’s getting paid. but would anyone wouldve guess that this would happen with the way he played last year? and obviously NO ONE out performed in in training camp or was anywhere near his caliber for the same about of money in free agency. i’m sure the steelers would’ve loved to start a 3rd rounder or cheap FA over a semi-highly paid vet and save 2 mil on the cap.

you failed to mention some of the good things the front office is doing also:
-our offensive line
-the extension of keisel instead of clark or reed
-fox (i think everyone laughed when he said he’d have an opportunity to start…no one was laughing on his pick 6)

by t1mmy10 on Dec 9, 2009 8:43 PM EST reply actions  

who says im being critical of the team. its just reality of life in the NFL

Freel free to email me anytime at behindthesteelcurtain@gmail.com with questions, suggestions, complaints, etc, or to just say what's up. -Michael Bean (Blitz)

by Michael Bean on Dec 9, 2009 11:19 PM EST up reply actions  

sorry that i misread it. just seemed like you were pointing some blame for our recent struggles on the way the front office allocated money…unavoidable or not.

we certainly are wishing we didnt give simmons that last contract, but i still stand by my take on those players. why we lost players we wish we kept or keep certain players we wish we had better replacements had a lot less to do with money and a lot more to do with expectations/projections of talent and roster space.

by t1mmy10 on Dec 10, 2009 3:24 PM EST up reply actions  

thank goodness we didn't extend Hampton or Mcfadden

Casey is worth 2 mill only. Pass defense is our problem. Mcfadden never broke on short routes to get interceptions and was always very average. We need a real athlete at corner. Lets see if Lewis might be one. You must “cut bait” in this league when a so-so player pretends he is excellent just because he plays beside Troy.

by buddydial on Dec 9, 2009 9:26 PM EST reply actions  

I'm still trying to figure out how many people it's gonna take to clean Stark's house!

These payday’s are unreal.

When the tailgate drops, the BS stops. Shut up and play!

by 1BlkGldFan on Dec 9, 2009 10:45 PM EST reply actions  

Blitz

Love the work as usual. I too am working on a cap piece that will break it down for the non-Capologist fans. Just some food for thought for everyone about the Simmons deal, while it was a major mistake, it is not crippling us. he signed a deal in 2007 with 7.85 mil bonus of which 4.71 was left (the final 3 years at $1.57 per) the salary portion isn’t guarenteed. Becuase he was released after 1 June, they could have split the cap hit over two years at a 50% hit each year but chose not to. This means they weren’t too worried about it. We also have 2.4 mil in dead money for Mahan (.8 mil times 3) and 1.05 in Foote’s remaining cap hit. None of that worries me though, they were all really low cap hits considering they were all starters (when they were resigned). Those were all Steeler Friendly Deals (Omar Khan is the man). What worries me are the cap hits of Hampton ($6.65 mil) Townsend ($2.3 Mil) and Parker ($4.5 mil). That is $6.8 mil for 2 players who play maybe 20 plays combined, and 6.65 for a 2 down Dlineman. Good work, I don’t want to put my whole thing in this response and have some more research myself to do, but hopefully I can add from an accounting side some knowledge on the cap to Steeler Nation.

"The superior man blames himself. The inferior man blames others." Don Shula

by SteelCage on Dec 10, 2009 6:23 AM EST reply actions  

good stuff

Look forward to it. Email me if you’d like to run it by me, or for formatting or whatever else. Thanks for the words.

Freel free to email me anytime at behindthesteelcurtain@gmail.com with questions, suggestions, complaints, etc, or to just say what's up. -Michael Bean (Blitz)

by Michael Bean on Dec 10, 2009 8:05 AM EST up reply actions  

I will take you up on that.

Take a look at my recent posting on the art of the interception and the draft. I’d like to hear your thoughts.

http://www.behindthesteelcurtain.com/2009/12/9/1192686/a-view-from-the-steelcage-some

"The superior man blames himself. The inferior man blames others." Don Shula

by SteelCage on Dec 10, 2009 11:55 AM EST up reply actions  

Good Read

http://www.pittsburghlive.com/x/pittsburghtrib/sports/steelers/s_656672.html

I like Ike Taylor. Yeah he can’t catch but the problem is he has to cover for Gay. An upgrade over Willie Gay will upgrade Ike because he can go back to what he does best, playing man to man.

"The superior man blames himself. The inferior man blames others." Don Shula

by SteelCage on Dec 10, 2009 6:59 AM EST reply actions  

Agreed

I have enjoyed your analysis so far SteelCage. Looking at some of the stats on William Gay as nickelback, as well as Ike having difficulty shading over for him, the secondary seems to me to be a smaller problem than I had originally thought. Polamalu seems capable when healthy to mask the problem, but really we lack a strong second CB. Were we able to find one, Gay could go back to the nickel, Clark’s range might not be so question, Farrior and Timmons might have less space to cover a cross the middle and so on.

Really, this is a qualification of the general argument of the razor’s edge that is success in the NFL. I find it difficult to believe that, even with all the injuries/declining play, we have seen such a marked regression from last year’s play/mental toughness.

I have always liked the O-Ring analogy from the Challenger space shuttle crash. Highly sophisticated, highly expensive piece of equipment (not dissimilar to the Steelers defense), but the malfunctioning of a very small component caused unforeseen damages.

Troy Pull-a-muscle? :(

by sctx109 on Dec 10, 2009 1:25 PM EST up reply actions  

Simmons

The Simmons contract always puzzled me. After being diagnosed with diabetes he was never the same player. I thought they would let him go after his initial contract instead of giving him an extension. Deshea is just one of those guys that age 3 years in 1. It happens to vets all the time, some at 30 others maybe 33 or 34, but it always happens. Farrior is in that category. These guys have been great players but this is a business and rewarding 30+ veteran players is tricky business and can bite you.

by madjack on Dec 10, 2009 9:38 AM EST reply actions  

Super Bowl Hangover

I think this is a great example of why teams experiance the SB hangover. Colbert does a good job in keeping the core around and scouting new talent to keep them competitive year to year. Then B/B and Santionio convert the best ending in S/B history and it all falls in place.
In our current situation, I do wish Mc Fadden was still around of course. Hopefully one of these rookies decide to seize the moment tonight.

Polamalu is the greatest of all time. Dont waist my time with arguments.

by Cjervin on Dec 10, 2009 11:57 AM EST reply actions  

Steelers Played the Cap Game Right

I think given that next year has the potential to be an uncapped year, the Steelers were VERY smart in the offseason in locking up solid, veteran players for several years before it got to that point. If it came at the risk of losing some special teams players then so be it. Look who we managed to lock up this offseason:
- Heath Miller (stud)
- James Harrison (stud)
- Brett Keisel (playing great this year)
- Trai Essex (stepped in for Stapleton nicely)
- Chris Kemoeatu (playing well)
- Justin Hartwig (playing well)
- Keyaron Fox (exceptional for a backup)
- Hines Ward (lifer)
Has it worked out perfectly this season? No. But which of those players would you cut to keep a guy like Madison or McFadden? None of them, especially considering we drafted two CBs. And say we had not signed Trai Essex…where would we be right now with Stapleton out. I think they played the situation as well as they could have and ensured that the core producers will be around for a while (even in uncapped years).

We got bit on kickoff return because nobody stepped up. I’ll take that over getting bit on offense or defense because the odds that someone steps up on special teams are a lot higher than someone being able to play in a defense that takes a year to learn or jumping right in on O…although Wallace was able to do that this year gladly. Willie Gay looked like he would be solid, but that did not turn out to be true…especially with Troy out and the sacks coming slow to start the season. All in all, the team is well-positioned for the biggest risk which is lack of a salary cap leading to not being able to retain their homegrown talent due to money rich teams poaching players (like the MLB – Oakland A’s pro farm team is a great example). I think the ball has just bounced the wrong way a bit this year just like it bounced the right way many times last year. Hopefully, we get a little more luck in the last 4 games and get Troy healthy sooner rather than later.

by phisqb on Dec 10, 2009 2:11 PM EST reply actions  


User Tools

Welcome to BTSC, a blog dedicated to the SIX-time world champion Steelers.

"Thoughtful discussion with a sense of history."

Art Rooney Jr.

"Level-headed thinking." Pittsburgh Post-Gazette

Start posting about the Steelers »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

Connect_with_facebook

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Btsc_pic_small
Bread and Circuses, or Who Gets the Thumb Down
Markstadiumoutside_small
The Real Steelers Issues Starting into Season 2010
Currentflag_small
Ask a Panthers' fan- Preseason game four
Pearljambackspacer51_small
Preseason Broncos Thread
F15_small
Hump Day Mix, Preseason week: 3

Recent FanPosts

7103_dull_blue-ish_background_small
SURVIVE TO THE BYE and then on we go to Ring #7
Small
Leftwich Is Hurt. Let the Second-guessing Begin
Small
Cuts just got tougher
Dave_small
OT: 2010 SB Nation Madden 11 Online Season for Xbox 360
466071961309_0_alb_small
Pre-game fun
Small
Media and Internet and Ben's meet tomorrow.
34270_1381082562035_1081054142_30923330_602514_n_small
Your BTSC Chef
Small
Calm Down
Small
The Greatest Nine Weeks Ever! (PART ONE)
Small
Head Games

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Latest NFL Headlines from SB Nation

SPONSORS

SBNation.com Recent Stories

PITTSBURGH - AUGUST 25:  Byron Leftwich #4 of the Pittsburgh Steelers warms up prior to the preseason game against the Carolina Panthers on September 2 2010 at Heinz Field in Pittsburgh Pennsylvania.  (Photo by Jared Wickerham/Getty Images)

Steelers Quarterback Byron Leftwich Leaves Game With Left Knee Injury

CHICAGO - AUGUST 28: Matt Leinart #7 of the Arizona Cardinals walks in the bench area during a preseason game against the Chicago Bears at Soldier Field on August 28 2010 in Chicago Illinois. The Cardinals defeated the Bears 14-9. (Photo by Jonathan Daniel/Getty Images) +2 updates

Leinart Playing Perhaps Final Game In Arizona As Cardinals Finish Preseason Vs. Redskins

Photo

Brady, Manning Make It Through Final Preseason Game Unscathed, Giants Edge Pats, 20-17

More from SBNation.com >


Site Founder & Editor

Me2_small Michael Bean

Steelers Historian

Steeler_small maryrose

Plainview_small Frank Mineo (DYMS)