Where Does Big Ben Stand?
Pittsburgh Steelers quarterback Ben Roethlisberger is going to Disney World for the second time at the ripe young age of 26. And with his two Super Bowl Rings his invitation for the Hall of Fame is suddenly all but in the mail as the sports world has begun to put him in the same conversation with the likes of Tom Brady and Peyton Manning.
After this wonderful Super Bowl, I was anxious to see the response from the media and their normal over hyping of a select few athletes after every championship performance. But before I get into that let me be the first to say, that Ben Roethlisberger has definitely moved up a notch in my book. Ben made some huge clutch accurate throws that were the key to winning Super Bowl 43. He produced a memorable game winning touchdown drive, and has basically locked himself into the class of clutch quarterbacks in football. He looked like a completely different quarterback from his previous Super Bowl years back, where it was quite clear that the stage was much too big for him at that point in his career.
Big Ben is still in the early to middle part of his career and he has many years to go, but at his current position he has almost became a lock for the Hall of Fame. In today’s football world if a quarterback somehow seems to win multiple Super Bowls there isn’t much of anything that can hold that guys value down. See, I feel that Championships in the NFL are a TEAM accomplishment, and individual value with rings needs to be analyzed to a whole other degree. He still has a lot to do for the rest of his years in making sure he consistently produces especially if the Steelers slide from their current elite position in the league where they have been for the bulk of Ben’s career.
Ben is a tough, improvising quarterback who has a knack for making the big play late in games. He now has two rings and is going to be viewed in years to come as maybe the best quarterback in the NFL. I don’t want to rain on anyone’s parade, but to put Ben over Peyton Manning when ranking quarterbacks is quite ridiculous. When comparing individual players for tops in their respected positions, you have to assume all surroundings and various aspects to be relative. Not one quarterback in the league could battle Peyton in such a competition, period. Roethlisberger has really only put up one impressive statistical regular season in his career. It’s not all about statistics, as he has won a great percentage of his games, but lets not fool ourselves because we know that the astounding Pittsburgh defense through the years has a lot to do with that.
Before the season it would have been debatable to place Ben Roethlisberger as low as 15th in the NFL in quarterback rankings, but after this years postseason success you won’t see him outside many top 5’s. Ben has earned this promotion and it is going to be very interesting to see if he is able to continue progressing and if his style of play will last in such a physical league.
0 recs |
39 comments
Comments
I will take Ben oven Peyton any day of the week
The bottom line in the NFL is winning. In his first five seasons, Ben has won more games than any other quarterback in the history of the NFL. His playoff winning percentage is better than everyone other than Brady. He has TWO rings in his first five seasons. Peyton has one. Ben is a proven winner who has come through in the clutch time and time again. Ben stands at the top…..
by Dr Del on Feb 10, 2009 8:52 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Ben is an elite QB, no doubt .. but the best thing
about him is that he’s getting better each year. Last year was a statistical breakout with the 32 TD’s, this year although the numbers were down the 2 key facts that stood out for me were the 6 come from behind drives (including the SB !!) and also we won 7 of 9 when you threw more than 30 passes. In the past, all the BB doubters would throw up the fact that we lost a lot of games when BB threw 30+ passes. But this year BB took a step up in putting the team on his back and delivering wins in big time games ..
I think next year could be an even better year as the offence continues to evolve with BB as the centre-piece .. so I’d expect a big statistical jump too.
I think the best QB to compare BB to is Elway. He’s a flat out winner and fearless leader like Elway was only has has better stats and has 2 rings in his first 5 years compared to Elway. I think BB will continue to develop and already has one foot in the Hall as long he backs it up with some consistent statistical years over the next 5-10 years.
by Rash92 on Feb 11, 2009 5:39 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
BTW, I forgot to say ..
lets please exclude all Mannings from this conversation because they are nothing but a family of chokers ! Eli has played a handful of good games in his career, he’s just lucky 3 of them were in the play-offs last year. We only need to watch a re-run of this years NFC divisional game against Philly to see what a pathetic figure Manning was .. it was shameful QB exhibition that gave his team no chance of winning, a classic MANNING.
And as for Peyton, a career 7-8 post season record, at least 4 1 & done’s in the post season, a QB rating lower in the post-season than in the regular season, throwing more INT’s than TD’s during his lone Superbowl run, please .. he’s the definition of a CHOKER ..
The Mannings, please …. they make me sick ..
by Rash92 on Feb 11, 2009 5:43 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
Can't Agree
I don’t think that Eli should be considered an elite QB… but Peyton certainly is…
Peyton’s 1 and dones had a lot to do with running into the Patriots in the post season — something that Cowher didn’t do so well at either, I recall… so I don’t think that is a good comparison. And don’t forget, for YEARS Elway was considered unable to win the big one, too…
by MarkJoel66 on Feb 11, 2009 8:23 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Peyton has trouble for sure
Peyton lost his second consecutive game to the chargers this post season. His record in the playoffs speaks for itself (7-8), and he loses to teams other than the patriots.
It was a nice story for him and dungy to finally win their super bowl, even though manning threw two picks, and one TD. Nobody made a big deal out of his terrible performance then, but he clearly struggled in that game as well.
by dwatts5000watts on Feb 11, 2009 9:14 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
peytons best regular season QB to ever play the game
Post season, has been very mortal and average, with a few very good games in there. But lots of suspect ones. I really do NOT like Peyton but have to give him his due for what he is. But come playoff time, ill take Ben all day over Peyton the Choker.
by Blitzburgh on Feb 11, 2009 10:52 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I do realise that my hatred for ..
all things Manning could colour my judgement but in my defence, while Manning is a dominant regular season player and will walk into the HoF because of the media’s love for all things Manning:
As I say he’s:
7-8 in the post-season
Has been 1 & done 6 times ( and NONE of those have been against the Patriots: NYJ, PIT, TEN, MIA, SD x2).
During his SB run in 4 games he threw 3 TD’s vs. 7 INT’s !
This guy is so UN-CLUTCH (and yes I know that’s not a real word) .. it’s unreal yet he still gets nothing but love from the media .. it really make me sick ..
People can say we won SB XL despite BB rather than because of him, but we know he carried us in the previous 3 games. As for Manning, 3 TD vs 7 INT, he can’t even say he carried his team through the post-season run ..
by Rash92 on Feb 11, 2009 11:56 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Nice
"The team that scores the most points wins."
John Madden
(Master of the obvious)
by PixburghArn on Feb 11, 2009 12:11 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Agree
Peyton is the third best QB in the league behind Brady and Ben. Heck, he may be fourth. I didn’t watch Drew Brees much this year but I think those stats are hyperinflated.
by CarlWeathersMustache on Feb 11, 2009 7:57 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
True
It was their suddenly re-surgent run defense that carried them to the SB in that game. Give Peyton credit for bringing his team back against the Pats* in that SB run, though. I know on the game winning TD drive, he got them down there, then they ran it in. I believe he was calling the plays, though.
That said, I’ll take the one who steps up in SBs over the fantasy football machine.
by WolfpackSteelersFan on Feb 12, 2009 2:13 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Not a HOF lock
Sorry… if Ben decided to quit tomorrow, he would not make the HOF. He would join Jim Plunkett as a QB with two rings who does not enter the hall.
He was certainly not super in Super Bowl XL. I agree, that we were there BECAUSE of him… but we won it IN SPITE of him.
This Super Bowl was his coming out party. But, Phil Simms had one of those — setting Super Bowl records — and he doesn’t have a ring.
If Ben makes it back and gets another ring, then I think you can say he is a lock — no one with 3 rings isn’t in… But he needs that ring — or a career of close calls from here on out — to get the HOF nod.
As for where he stands… I am not sure. His improvisational skills are great — no doubt. But I think Leftwich exposed some of his flaws. When Byron was in there, he made his reads and decisions much faster. Even with his big wind up and throw, he got rid of the ball much quicker than Ben did. Ben needs to work on that, IMHO.
I think you need to realize that Ben holds on to the ball too long sometimes just because he is unsure of where to go with it. That’s not elite kind of stuff. Philly showed what a good defense can do with constant pressure against Ben.
Having said all of that, in 2007, when he had a passing rating of 104, he looked pretty good. So, it’s really hard to say. If we can ever give him a good line, and a couple of receivers with break-away speed, we might find out how good he can be.
So… my vote is: Too early to tell on Ben. He has shown flashes of greatness — and most importantly, he has shown them when it counts — but it’s too early to say he is “better” than Brady or Manning.
by MarkJoel66 on Feb 11, 2009 8:36 AM EST reply actions 1 recs
Phil Simms..
He has two rings actually. I’m guessing you meant he’s not in the HoF?
by tdp992 on Feb 11, 2009 4:27 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Two Rings, yes
But It was Jeff Hostetler that played in Super Bowl XXV — Simms broke his foot and was out for the year… And, he is not in the HOF. I saw him say recently that he doesn’t think he deserves to be there, snce he didn’t play long enough and do enough…
by MarkJoel66 on Feb 11, 2009 4:44 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Sorry
I just saw my typo… yes… Phil has a ring… I meant he is not in the HOF. Damn… I wish I could edit comments…
by MarkJoel66 on Feb 11, 2009 4:46 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Feel the same way about editing
Should definitely be added to SBNation(along with a Laker blog…!). But people don’t really seem to care much about double posting like some sites do.. so i usually just reply to my own mistake and make the correction.
by tdp992 on Feb 11, 2009 7:00 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Editing is a bad idea because of replies to individual comments. If I reply and you change the original comment it could completely screw up the conversation.
Don't worry about the haters. Haters only hate.
by steelguy99 on Feb 12, 2009 9:32 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
True
But if Ben’s next five years even approximate his first five he’s in. Of course, with the pounding he takes, that’s a big IF.
by CarlWeathersMustache on Feb 11, 2009 7:59 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
WRONG
Ben DID help us win that super bowl. I contest he was crucial.
To prove the point. He completed 9 passes. 8 of those were THIRD DOWN CONVERSIONS. Think about that. He bossed up when needed.
He threw a TD that was dropped by future MVP Hines.
He Ran for a TD, and I do believe he got it.
People recognize 06 was kinda a scratch of a year, and 07 was beauty. 08 was great with a ring.
So the dude has ONE bad year because he stopped a car with his face. Two Titles, 1 AFC Champ loss to cheaters, and 1 Wild Card loss because our D was ravaged by injury and the league leading rusher was gone.
by Mechem on Feb 11, 2009 11:38 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
8 Third down conversions
Thanks for that info. I knew I had read that, but didn’t feel like looking it up. To me, Super Bowl XL was as much of a team win as any that I’ve seen. And, Ben wasn’t great passing, but he did make plays. Eight third down conversions is huge. His block to spring Randle El helped clinch the game. He ran for the first down that basically ended the game. He made mistakes, but he did make plays, even when his passing was struggling.
by WolfpackSteelersFan on Feb 12, 2009 2:35 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Yes but
He also threw two critical interceptions — one which was almost Neil O’Donnel like — if not for the Super Bowl MVP running Herndon down, it would have been a TD.
Yes, Ben threw a great block — so that the wide receiver could do what Ben was unable to: Throw a TD pass.
I’m not meaning to pile on Ben, but we won in spite of him, not because of him. If we had switched QBs in that game(ie Ben for Matt), the Steelers would have won in a blow out.
Oh… and he did NOT get in on the touchdown. That was obvious from the replay. I actually WISH they had called that one right, because what everyone forgets is we had two more downs… I believe that we would have handed the ball off to Jerome on next play, and I believe the Bus would have gone into the end zone if all of Seattle — including every Starbucks employee — had stood in his way.
Ben had one bad year — agreed. Ben has done a lot with a little. Agreed. But if Jim Plunkett isn’t in.. and Phil Simms isn’t in, and Larry King is insisting that Kurt Warner hasn’t done enough for long enough to get in, I’d love to know why you think Ben belongs in ALREADY.
I think Ben WILL get in. Because I think his career is far from over. But he is not lock yet…
by MarkJoel66 on Feb 12, 2009 2:58 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Ben's TD
I’ve watched that several times. When he collided with the defender in the air, he was too close to the goal line to overturn the call. It was after the collision that he was pushed back and came down with the ball about 3-6 inches short of the goal line. So, the call was correct, since it was ruled a TD on the field.
by WolfpackSteelersFan on Feb 12, 2009 3:19 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I disagree
I said it already; I think if Ben retired now, he’d be a HOFer. I think he is based on the following:
- 2 SB rings in his first 5 years (second youngest to win 2 SBs)
- record for most wins in first 5 years
- only QB to take his team to conference championship in each of first two years
- top 10 in career passer rating
- one of handful (5, I think) of QBs to get his team to the playoffs 4 of first 5 years
I don’t think that he’d be a first ballot HOFer, but I think he’d get in eventually, just based on his career so far. Yes, your criticisms of him are accurate, but his accomplishments to this point in his career (in terms of championships, playoff wins, and overall wins) are more impressive than just about any QB in NFL history (possible exception being Otto Graham).
And, honestly, I wouldn’t put a ton of stock in Leftwich looking sharper in his limited play than Ben did. The reason I say that is that it is not at all uncommon for defenses to struggle against a QB who they haven’t seen much, and particularly a veteran with experience who has a much different style than the starter. If Ben was down for an extended period, I doubt Byron would have looked so sharp for an extended period of time. At least based on his career as a starter at Jacksonville. Once he took a few hits (which he would, because he is not mobile), he’d start struggling.
by WolfpackSteelersFan on Feb 12, 2009 2:31 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Not enough
The Hall Of Fame is based on a career. Not five years.
There are plenty of people out there who don’t think Lynn Swann belongs in the hall… and he did it for longer than Ben has (so far).
As for Leftwich outplaying Ben… I am not saying that Byron is the man. I think Ben has clearly proved he is the guy here for years to come.
But Byron gets rid of the ball quicker. He makes his decision and makes his throw. (Hell, with his windup, he NEEDS to make his decision fast!)
Ben needs to learn how to do that better. That’s all I am saying.
by MarkJoel66 on Feb 12, 2009 3:02 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Gale Sayers
7 year career, but really only 5 were productive (He gained less than 100 combined rushing yards his last 2 years). He’s in the HOF.
It’s not always based on longevity, although that’s factored in. He’s not a lock, but I say what he’s accomplished in terms of championships and wins is far enough ahead of anyone else to get him in. Thankfully, this discussion is moot since he’s not retiring. :)
by WolfpackSteelersFan on Feb 12, 2009 3:27 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Agreed
I agree it is moot. Happily so… Ben is still playing.
But I don’t think Gale Sayers is a good counter argument. I heard Peter King (who has a vote on the HOF) argue this very point about Kurt Warner. His contention was that Gale Sayers completely dominated the position as well as being a legitimate threat on kick off returns, and that made him unique.
He was saying that Kurt Warner, League MVP, Super Bowl MVP, and owner of the top two records for passing yardage in the Super Bowl, did not generate the kind of legacy that made him a lock for the HOF.
Now, if Kurt Warner — with his stats — isn’t in after five years, it’s really hard to argure that Ben should be in after his five years.
As you point out, happily, it is not an issue. If we can get some wide-bodies in front of him, Ben should have a long career yet…
by MarkJoel66 on Feb 12, 2009 8:34 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
But
Gale Sayers didn’t dominate his position, at least not by today’s standards. He only had 2 1000 yard seasons. Check out here and look at years 1965-1971. He only lead the league in rushing twice (only once if you count both AFL and NFL). He’s in the HOF for the plays that he made, not the overwhelming stats that he put up. And, in fact, if doesn’t have that 6 TD game, he may not be in.
Kurt Warner was hurt because his run of League MVPs, SB appearances, etc. only lasted 3 years. After the Rams lost the SB to the Pats*, Warner (IIRC) had a couple of concussions early the next season, and he sucked. They started something like 0-6, and Bulger came in and supplanted him. Then, he was released, and until this season, has been a journeyman QB. For Warner, you can only say that there were 4 seasons where you knew he was the starter.
Anyway, again, good fodder for offseason discussion, and thankfully, Ben will be around for a while longer (we hope).
by WolfpackSteelersFan on Feb 13, 2009 10:59 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Gale Sayers
Brian’s Song didn’t hurt either… sometimes what happens outside the game has a lot to do how people remember the player inside the game…
Does anyone think that John Madden is really in the HOF because if his coaching? WIthout MNF and EA Sports, I contend he would not be in…IMHO.
by MarkJoel66 on Feb 13, 2009 11:00 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Ben's career ...
and his place in the Hall of Fame will be determined by the quality of his surrounding cast. He does some great things on his own. However, I see that the good results that come about often come about because of the great things being done simultaneously by the supporting cast-the receiver being smart enough to track Ben and get in position, the lineman who is able to track Ben and get the right block thrown.
by tenthmtnman on Feb 11, 2009 10:01 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
Well, That's True, but...
his place in the Hall of Fame will be determined by the quality of his surrounding cast
That’s true of everyone, isn’t it? Bradshaw was Super Bowl MVP… but Swan made some incredible grabs to make that happen…
Elway wins a Super Bowl… but he failed previously without Terrel Davis…
It is a team sport, after all…
by MarkJoel66 on Feb 11, 2009 11:12 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Ben
stands on the podium, hoisting another Lombardi Trophy.
by Fahey on Feb 11, 2009 2:23 PM EST reply actions 1 recs
Where does Ben Stand?
Yeah, I thought of answering it: “Right behind center — unless he’s in the shotgun…”
by MarkJoel66 on Feb 11, 2009 4:45 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
In the league now.
I want Ben over anyone.
Peyton is old, and hasnt really been clutch. Wouldnt have won his only championship if Chicago didnt fumble 17 times.
Brady is old, coming off injuries. He cheated.
Rivers/Brees/Cutler/Delhomme/Romo/(insert productive yet championshipless QB) all suck.
So basically I want Large Benjamin.
As far as all time. I put him in the top 10-5 right now.
by Mechem on Feb 11, 2009 11:35 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Comparisons
Well, I disagree on Peyton’s not being clutch… but I agree his age makes me prefer Ben.
Tom Brady — depends on how he comes back. Palmer “seemed” to come back fine from a simlar injury, but hasn’t been the same since — co-incidence? Maybe… I really don’t like the “Tom is only good because he cheated” thing though. He still made the throws… and his best year came AFTER the whole Spygate thing happened.
Rivers — puts up good numbers and an impressive rating. I don’t like him. Watching Jay Cutler and him jawing at each other made them both look like frat boys.
Romo is vastly over-rated.
But I think you left out one — Drew Brees. He went to New Orleans to help the city, which is pretty cool. And he has been a great leader there on and off the football team. He could have broken Dan Marino’s record of most yards in a season, but he was trying to win the game instead. I think he shows a lot of character and he would have fit in here in the ‘burgh. I wouldn’t trade Ben for him NOW, but he seems like a class act.
I think Ben is a perfect fit in PITTSBURGH. I can’t imagine anyone else here. But if I am making a list of the top five QBs in the league, I don’t have Ben number 1. He’s probably number 3. One thing he has to learn how to do is: A) THROW to beat an all out blitz — running doesn’t work and B) make his decisions faster and get rid of the ball.
That might be his receivers not getting separation fast enough, but part of it is trust. You watch Warner, Peyton, and Brady, and they get the ball out in anticipation of the receiver’s move. It seems like Ben is “looking for someone who is open.”
by MarkJoel66 on Feb 12, 2009 9:54 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
Brees
I dont hate Brees by any means. I think he is an excellent player. My statement may have been rather generalized, but my point was these QB’s that dont win games/championships dont mean a lot to me.
Peyton aint clutch. Seriously. Read this article. Sums it up nicely.
by Mechem on Feb 12, 2009 3:18 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
The final drive by Ben in SB 43 proved he belongs up there with the best. Time after time he scrambled around to allow someone to get open. All the time I was screaming, THROW THE DAMN BALL,. What a clutch player…not all the time, but certainly in Tampa Bay.
by montanaeasy56 on Feb 12, 2009 6:38 PM EST reply actions 0 recs

by 




















