The Unknown Variable In The Pittsburgh Steelers 2009 Offseason Strategy
Take a look at the following list of Offensive Tackles that are about to become free agents. That's 38 games worth of starts between Colon, Smith and Starks.
Pittsburgh Steelers OT Free Agents:
Willie Colon (OT) - restricted
Max Starks (OT)
Trai Essex (OT)
Marvel Smith (OT)
Here's what we know - the Steelers likely aren't re-signing Marvel Smith, unless he's willing to slide way down the pay scale. The more I think about it, it's actually possible given how much time he's missed the past two years and knowing what he knows about how the Steelers do business.
The problem for Smith though is that unlike Alan Faneca, Marvel may not garner much interest from anybody. The NFL is financially healthy, but let's face it. The current economic climate isn't one where anybody's really interested in rolling the dice on a high-price, extremely high-risk investment in any industry, even football.
So it's actually possible that the Steelers could retain him before he even hits the market with a very reasonable incentive laden contract to balance out the risk of Smith's chronic back problem. Smith knows the 'business' side of things well enough and has well into the 8 figures in the bank account. So who knows. And for the team, they're able to possiblly protect themselves from much guaranteed financial exposure with a cleverly constructed contract.
Still, there's no way that the Steelers are resting their hopes of success, not to mention protecting their $100+ million dollar QB with a 30+ year old with chronic back problems.
So that leaves us with Essex, Colon and Starks.
Ok, so that leaves us with Colon and Starks. Kidding actually, as it's possible that Essex has to be kept around as a security blanket if it so happens that Starks and Smith aren't retained.
Being that he's restricted, you can just about bet on Willie Colon being in a Steelers uniform next year. He's too durable, will be affordable, and still young enough where the Steelers will be forced to keep him from a business stand point. At least that's my feeling. That's assuming another team falls in line with what I consider rational behavior and doesn't price us out with a ridiculous offer. My guess is we'll tender Colon a qualifying offer much like we did with Nate Washington last offseason. Perhaps even for basically the same amount of money more or less (~$1.4 million).
Ok, so there's one of our Tackles most likely.
What about Starks then? Depends. Last year nobody really showed much interest in Max. I'll get into this one more in the coming weeks as well as eagerly anticipate your takes, but the uncertainty that his situation entails is precisely the point of my post.
What to do with Mr. Max?
But really, it goes a layer deeper than Max and by that I mean Tony Hills actually is the critical factor here because the organization will be potentially be forced to choose up front to make an effort to retain Starks, or head into the draft not knowing what will happen if he's yet to be acquired before free agency ends. Would we then have to potentially overspend yet again on retaining Starks by tagging him for just a year?
I have spoken about this with people before, but I personally think Tony Hills could turn out much better than most think. First of all, don't lose sight of the fact that he was extremely highly rated to begin with before he broke his leg deep into his junior year. And even more importantly, there really should be no denying his size, particularly his arm length which is vital for the T position.We can all joke OL Coach Larry Zierlein, but here was his first reaction last spring when Hills was drafted when asked about his attributes:
I’ll tell you one thing – he’s really big. When I went down to work him out, and I’ve seen him, and watched him on tape, I really was surprised at how big he was. He has long arms. As a former tight end, he’s a pretty good athlete. His strength probably needs to develop a little bit, but he is athletic, he’s big, and if you have those two things that’s a good start.
He's big. At least in the areas that matter most for a T (6'6", long enough arms) rather than just a sheer big weight number like the shorter (6'3") more stumpy Colon. He was fairly raw and hadn't had much regular contact last camp in quite some time. Give him a year with the Steelers strength and conditioning coach and let's see what happens to a 24 year old 'underdeveloped' 300 pounder.Strength may be an issue for the time being and more than likely still in 2009, but the unteachable gifts like long arms and a huge frame are there. Period.
He was well on his way to being a 1st or 2nd round draft pick. It's accurate that scouts dinged him for his strength as a right tackle and for his foot speed as a left tackle. But that shouldn't fool you from the fact that talent wise, he was rated near the top of his class as a junior and was named a 1st Team All American despite missing the final few games of the 2006 season.
Bottom line is we won't know until we see him back in pads going up against Deebo and Wood in the spring and summer. No point in speculating endlessly until we hear who the Steelers have selected with their draft picks come April. Instead, let me just ask some basic questions:
1) How easy or hard is it to fall from a Day 1 pick in the National Football League to a 4th or 5th rounder? I'll answer. Very easy. The trend I've been seeing in the last couple of years is teams going the Bill Parcells route - i.e. building from the inside out; from offensive line out to the perimeter. Teams have been reaching BIGtime for offensive linemen in Round 1 as a result of strict adherence to this mindset.
Once more. Eight tackles in Round 1 last year? Are you freakin' kidding me?
Then, the T position seems to get abandoned for a round or two as teams decide that the elite crop is long gone. And as a consequence of all these early picks used on Tackles, there were all these great players from varied positions available in Rounds 2 and 3. Don't believe me? Check out Round 2 and Round 3 of last year's Draft. Notice anything?
Only a small handful of Tackles taken between pick #26 and #130 in the fourth round when Hills finally came off the board.
2) So given that there's this very hard to explain gap between when pick #26 and the next Tackle was taken, is it possible that the 'talent' gap between Duane Brown, Sam Baker, Jeff Otah et al is not nearly as big as their divergent draft statuses might suggest?
3) And is it possible that some of that separation in the first place is an artificial byproduct of NFL teams trying to minimize a dynamic volatile variable like injury concerns in an already unscientific and unformulaic endeavor like the NFL draft?
4) Do the Rooneys and the Steelers army of scouts feast on finding value where others do not?
5) Is Dan Rooney, Kevin Colbert and the other top personnel brass of the organization short sighted?
6) Obviously not so then would it be fair to say that they were 110% aware that Smith, Essex, Starks, and Colon would all be FAs after the 2008 season?
7) Of course. Is is then also possible that Hills got every bit of extra attention that was realistically possible to help him learn the complexities of the game without actually shoving him into the fold on a SB winning team? In other words, was Hills given more attention than say a Trai Essex in preparation for 2009 and beyond perhaps?
To me, the team's decision with regards to Max Starks should tell the story. Free Agency begins on February 27th. Will we even take our chances and just re-sign him, like I suggested could be the case with Marvel in the earlier paragraphs? Is there any animosity between Starks and the organization after what went down last year? Will Starks be willing to seek middle ground before testing the waters? He did after all get to prove himself much more in 2008 and than in 2007 when he only was inserted into the lineup around the Mud Bowl Game half way or so through the season.
If we do not or if Starks refuses to re-sign, will teams jump out of the gate right away and make an offer to him? Or will interest be minimal like last year? If so, the Steelers will have tougher decisions to make in the Draft. If other teams are smart, they'll hold tight and force the Steelers move. We'll get into all the scenarios soon enough, but there's absolutely everything possible in play with Starks, including even the off chance of him being slapped with the franchise tag, something the organization has stayed away from historically.
Anyway, it's a complicated situation that we'll do our best to sift through from the sidelines. But let it be known that Tony Hills, our 4th round selection from the University of Texas in last year's draft, is my sub-plot of the offseason and my surprise guy for the team if not this coming year, 2010 for sure. Even if it's just some part-time contributions, good and bad, I think he will be a much bigger part of our immediate future in 2009 than one might think. By the way, before I conclude, UT is not kiddy 'project' land for OL talent in the NFL. I could provide a laundry list of guys who have been churned out of that program along the offensive line. And Hills was highly regarded within that accomplished Longhorns fraternity.
If his leg's healed even more this past year and he's ready to go physically (the knee hasn't bothered him one lick since arriving in Pittsburgh), don't be shocked if the Steelers head into 2009 having Hills be a big part of their either their primary or contingency plans along the offensive line.
PS. He's been around Champions for the past year. And Mike Tomlin. He's good at his job.
39 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
100% Agreement
This may sound stupid, but I completely forgot about Tony Hills. He was great at Texas. And I’ve always said, if you want to know who the Steelers are letting go of, look at the drafts from the last couple of years.
I said this about Deebo this year. As stupid as it sounds now (and I’m doing a good job of sounding stupid in this post) I really thought it would take this kind of year to MAKE us resign him. We drafted Bruce Davis in the third round, I thought, as his replacement a few years down the road. Now, despite his age, I think they’ll give him another year or two on his contract this offseason to avoid the chance at free agency.
But back to Hills, if he gets his strength up, as you said, he is the deciding factor. Does the coaching staff believe he can do the job at tackle enough to let go of Starks, I know the front office does, that’s why we drafted him. His progress will undoubtedly be a strong factor in ouf offseason moves this year.
agreed about deebo btw
Though no telling what he would have done to stay where he’s now comfortable. But agree with what you’re saying for sure by the Davis connection.
by Michael Bean on Feb 11, 2009 9:36 AM EST up reply actions
Even though he was an end
Davis was really good in college, pre-season all american his senior year. He had 12.5 sacks that year. If he was a little bigger he would of been a first rounder, maybe.
But like Hills, strength is a little lacking, he’s a finesse player right now. Lets give him some time, but I think he could be really good for us a few years down the road.
by NYSteelersFan4 on Feb 11, 2009 9:47 AM EST up reply actions
I am having a hard time finding something to disagree with here, and I love being disagreeable. People drop all the time in the draft and the steelers love picking up bargains. Unfortunately we need to wait until training camp and the pre-season games to really have a look at Tony Hills. Everything up until then is just guesswork.
Hills very much has the capacity to be a good tackle, but physical tools only go so far in the NFL. It’d be nice if someone could leak his strength stats from last year to this year to give us an indication of how he has progressed in that department as that is at least measurable. The unfortunate part is that I have no faith in Z to coach anyone up. If we had a solid O-line coach I would have plenty of faith that Hills was drafted due to perceived talent and that the talent would be developed, but now?
Hills will not start at LT this year, no way. I can’t imagine a scenario where he has progressed enough to be the starting LT for the franchise. I really want us to resign Starks, and even Colon. We can joke about Colon all we want, but if we can improve the interior through the draft (and we can), this will help our mediocre tackles out tremendously and give us a very good starting spot.
Lets say Hills has pumped iron like crazy this past year and has enough strength to start at RT. I say if Starks is resigned Hills gets a shot to compete with Colon. If he beats him out Colon could slide to guard. Unfortunately this scenario will not play out because I do not believe Hills will beat out Colon, and Colon is clearly going to play tackle as long as he plays for the steelers. Still, it’s a nice idea. Maybe next year.
Great article on the potential of Hills though.
Don't worry about the haters. Haters only hate.
no he wont start on a SB defender
But he could very well be backing up Marvel or Max – and that’s one snap away from him playing.
by Michael Bean on Feb 11, 2009 9:50 AM EST up reply actions
particularly if the team thinks the risk is worth it
to go with marvel for much cheaper than max and then live with the risk of his back issues. thats only if theyre confident in hills to be ready in a pinch.
Not that likely a scenario, but it’s in play.
by Michael Bean on Feb 11, 2009 9:51 AM EST up reply actions
I’d definitely like him to move up the depth chart over Essex, assuming Essex sticks around. If Essex is left to sign with another team I think that will signal that the steelers are comfortable with Hills development.
Don't worry about the haters. Haters only hate.
for sure
But I dont think keeping Essex means necessarily the opposite. It could be like an 800k 1 year insurance policy against disaster injury wise and total shellshock from Hills that just isnt acceptable. Essex could be last emergency and considering the potential for disaster if it were say Marvel and Hills, then thatd be 800k-1.5m well spent on Essex. But if Marvel comes for less money than Max would – as in would save the team more than 1.5 million in 2009 (and even more in future years)by choosing Marvel, then a chunk of that money could go to essex for security.
by Michael Bean on Feb 11, 2009 10:45 AM EST up reply actions
Count me among those who doubt Hills
I hope I’m wrong, but I don’t think he’ll make the team this year. And if he makes it, he’ll still be third string. I haven’t heard anyone mention his name as a possible solution next year. Colbert said he was nervous that his top 3 LT’s were FA’s and said nothing like “we’ve got a pretty good backup in Tony Hills”. There was an optimistic buzz about Harrison when Porter left, ARE when Plax left, and even Kemo when Faneca left.
charity standing orders
if he was on the team this year
Unless we keep all three free agents and draft one or two tackles and/or keep a guy like Capizzi, I’m not sure how he wouldnt make the team next year if he kept on it this year. Essex didnt even see the field really. And Hills was behind him.
by Michael Bean on Feb 11, 2009 10:58 AM EST up reply actions
Wow, great stuff, I am hoping Hills is the back-up RT this season, with a chance to compete with Willie Holdin Colon. (He actually false starts more than holds, but still).
I'll drink your Milkshake, I'll drink it up!
by Frank Mineo (DYMS) on Feb 11, 2009 10:57 AM EST reply actions
good topic
Love this one, and I’d say from the outside looking in what is there not to like about Starks? He lost his starting RT gig, has played most of the snaps at LT the last two seasons, and not once complained. (I’m sure the big payday helped) That’s a good team player in my mind. Who knows what went on behind the scenes, but I would think the priority would be to sign Starks and Essex and then focus the draft on interior line. The “good” tackles, just like last year, are going to be gone save for a trade up into the teens.
by nerves of steel on Feb 11, 2009 11:24 AM EST reply actions
+1
On top of the on field play, you also hear a lot of talk about how much charitable work he does. And with character always in the equation now, that’s just one more reason to like him.
by NYSteelersFan4 on Feb 11, 2009 11:58 AM EST up reply actions
History
Hi Blitz, great write up.
I agree totally, and believe that there is a good chance that Hills will get significant playing time next year. One of the tell tale signs for me is our history of developing O-line talent.
Look at our current squad. Only four players were taken earlier than Tony Hills in the draft.
Kendall Simmons and Marvel Smith were both first rounders. Simmons started 14 games during his first year. He was injured the other two. Smith started 12 games and missed 4 due to injury.
Max Starks was our next highest pick on the line. He came in during the third round and did not play during his first year. During his second year he started every game on a Super Bowl bound team.
Finally we have Trai (and try again) Essex – he was drafted in the third round of 2005. He seems to be the only mid-round guy who did not come in make a serious contribution by his second year.
The rest our O-Line looks like this:
Willie Colon: Drafted 4th Round 2006 – Made 2 Starts in 2006 after being inactive for 14 games, 16 starts in 2007
Darnell Stapelton: UFA 2007 – Inactive all of 2007 – Started 14 games on a Super Bowl bound team
Chris Kemoeatu: 6th Round 2005 – Inactive for all but one game in 2005, 2 starts in 2006 , ST player in 07, Starter in 08
Justin Hartwig – was taken in the 6th round in 2002 by Tennessee and started right away.
Jermey Parquet: Drafted 7th round 2005 – no contribution yet
Jason Capizzi: UFA 2006 – no contribution yet
Here is a list of guys we took in the draft at O-line since 2000 who didn’t make the team:
Cameron Stephenson: 5th round 2007
Marvin Phillip 6th round 2006
Bo Lacy 6th round 2004
Mathais NKwenti 4th round 2001
All in all it seems to me that Blitz is right on in his analysis.
The Steelers draft good talent. They have cobbled together a line from talent that has significantly less potential than Tony Hills. My guess looking at all of these names is that you will see Mr. Hill somewhere on that line next year. Either that or we will remember him as the next Trai Essex.
Good catch
Our first round pick that year was Plex.
by SteelerBuddha on Feb 11, 2009 1:31 PM EST up reply actions
OL Draft history abysmal
Sorry Buddha, I got to disagree with your assessment of Steelers’ recent draft history as it pertains to OL. Our problems on OL are directly attributable to poor drafting. Here’s a breakdown of our OL Draft History from 1997-2007
Steelers Mid-to-Late OL Draftees
1997-2007
1997: T Paul Wiggins (3rd Round)
1998: T Chris Conrad (3rd Round)
1999: T Kris Farris (3rd Round)
2000: No OL picked after Rnd 2 (M. Smith)
2001: T Mathias Nkwenti (4th Round), Chukky Okobi (5th Round)
2002: No OL picked after Rnd 1 (K. Simmons)
2003: No OL picked
2004: T Max Starks (3rd Round), T Bo Lacy (6th Round), C Drew Caylor (6th Round)
2005: T Trai Essex (3rd Round), G Chris Kemoeatu (6th Round)
2006: T Willie Colon (4th Round), C Marvin Philp (6th Round)
2007: G Cam Stephenson (5th Round)
Total: 13 OL picked over 11-year period after Round 2
Starters for Steelers: 3
Starters for other NFL Teams: 0
Total seasons as the No. 1 starter. 5 (2 Colon, 2 Starks, 1 Kemo)
Quality Starters: 0
The only above average OL we have drafted over the past 11 years, including first-and second-rounders (15 total players) is Marvel Smith. I appreciate that Tony Hills might be an exception. We’ll just have to see because nothing positive has happened yet on on the field, and Hills has health issues that go way beyond the broken leg he suffered at Texas. He was a TE in high school who ripped up his left knee his senior year. Recovery from that injury was not 100 per cent because of nerve damage, leaving him with limited mobility. He basically just put on weight and tried to learn the OT position at Texas and obviously did fairly well, but he played less than two years as the starter and is still learning the position. He WAS a good athlete and is now huge. That’s about all he has going for him, physically. He is WAY behind the learning curve and might also be physically limited compared to other OT prospects. The lack of mobility also means he is probably not a project for guard or LT in the future. His inexperience, injury history and lack of mobility all contributed to him being available in the fourth round. He is still a longshot to make it.
by steeler.lifer on Feb 11, 2009 3:32 PM EST up reply actions
Alan Faneca? First rounder 1998 I beleive, somewhere around 25-28. The stuff about Hills is concerning though.
by NYSteelersFan4 on Feb 11, 2009 4:04 PM EST up reply actions
Great catch
thanks nysteeler, faneca indeed a first-rounder in 98. I was so focused on mid to late rounders that I forgot the best one we’ve picked lol!!!
by steeler.lifer on Feb 11, 2009 4:14 PM EST up reply actions
BTW
If you notice, I was not making the argument that our approach to drafting O-line is great, only that we seem to have done OK up until now (2 super-bowls in the past 4 years, is hard to argue with) and that based on recent history there is a decent chance that Tony Hills is likely to see the field before the season is out.
by SteelerBuddha on Feb 11, 2009 9:00 PM EST up reply actions
Important topic
Without doubt the left tackle position will be critical for this team this off season. Starks is serviceable, but far from dominant. Essex is well, Essex. However, I have to disagree with the optimistic thoughts toward Hills. I’m aware of all his attributes and awards coming out of Texas as well as his history of injuries…However…one absolutely has to consider that despite this team winning the Super Bowl, this was one of the worst offensive lines fielded by the Steelers in the last 20-30 years…46 sacks, 23rd in the league in rushing, deplorable in short yardage situations—-YET despite this—-Hills couldn’t get a SINGLE snap. It wasn’t like he was Bruce Davis trying to push Timmons, Woodley, Farrior, Harrison, or Foot off the field. The coaches didn’t think him worthy of getting a SINGLE snap, even after Smith went down at LT…he couldn’t get a snap in front of Trai Essex? They wouldn’t even let him on the field in a late season throw away game against Cleveland.
I’d put about as much hope in this guy as I’d put in Jason Capizzi…one of the other ‘heralded’, gargantuan OL stiffs that never lived up to even the slightest of expectations. For some reason the Steelers coaches quite obviously don’t see a lot in this guy, and that’s a shame, because Lord knows we need talent at this position.
you dont just insert OL into games randomly
even when starters are struggling a bit. Not the same as getting a few snaps at antoher position like Limas Sweed did.
by Michael Bean on Feb 11, 2009 8:51 PM EST up reply actions
Incorrect Information
3 tackles were selected in the 3 rd round and 2 more after pick 110. Teams were drafting tackles, just not him. Reviewing the 08 draft also made me realize that we passed on Cliff Avril for Bruce Davis. Avril was out man, I hope Bruce comes to play in 09
thanks
didnt even notice compensatory picks but missed those other anyway. will change in a bit. thank you.
by Michael Bean on Feb 11, 2009 8:30 PM EST up reply actions
Incorrect Info
3 tackles were selected in the 3 rd round and 2 more after pick 110. Teams were drafting tackles, just not him. Reviewing the 08 draft also made me realize that we passed on Cliff Avril for Bruce Davis. Avril was out man, I hope Bruce comes to play in 09
65 St. Louis Rams John Greco Offensive tackle Toledo
96 Washington Redskins Chad Rinehart Offensive tackle Northern Iowa
99 Baltimore Ravens Oniel Cousins Offensive tackle UTEP
Any chance
We’ve been trying to get him to make the switch to guard? With his athleticism, and lack of great strength, I could see him as a good guard, pulling out around the edge, and getting up field. Perhaps thats why we didn’t see a whole lot of him this year.
by NYSteelersFan4 on Feb 11, 2009 12:40 PM EST reply actions
Tackle situation
At this point, I would think that we need to give Starks a decent contract, and sign Colon for as little as possible. We really can’t count on Hills or any OT that we are likely to have available, even if we look at trading up to the low 20s. And, that is only likely if a solid to top OT falls into those slots, which seems unlikely. I really don’t see any point in signing Marvel again. Even if he’s healthy this summer, so what? He was healthy each of the last two summers, and didn’t last more than 5-6 games before being lost for the year. Yeah, you could sign him for the vet minimum and keep him for depth, but he’s unlikely to start for an entire season.
by WolfpackSteelersFan on Feb 11, 2009 3:40 PM EST reply actions
Thank god we have a plush sked next year
Even if we kept our entire starting line, it would be an easier year for them, and they might surprise us.
Great discussion by everyone
and really thought provoking post by Blitz. Not sure what to make of the situation myself, except for the following points.
1. Starks has competed at a championship level for two separate seasons. It’s not gonna get much better for either side, so if something can be worked out that would be best. If not then the O-line could very well be back to square one.
2. I’m having a hard time imaging any teams risking considerable money on Marvel’s health issues (bad backs have a nasty habit of being chronic issues). Keeping him, quite frankly would be a risk. The best bet from my perspective would be him to resign a heavily incentive laden contract, otherwise bye-bye.
3. Two things I think people have forgotten about Essex; Tomlin was very high on how he had improved over last off season, and he is one of the most flexible O-line players we’ve got, able to play guard and tackle on both sides. If Kemo doesn’t return could he be in the mix for his replacement?
4. Regardless of talent it takes time for a group to jell. Right now, other than probably Hartwig and Simmons we could be talking about largely a blank slate that may take until mid-season to round into shape.
Personally, I think that the solution here is a combination of some quality draft (second round and below okay), udfa acquisitions combined with a possible above average quality free agent pickup (think Hartwig) plus retention of two of our own free agents in order to have the mix of talent to push and develop together. The requirements of working for the Steelers are daunting; you must be able to deliver a power running game in addition to a complex passing offense featuring a qb who is most effective when plays extend beyond five seconds. Otherwise, you suck. The one thing going for the Steelers is that playing for them is alot like playing for Penn State in Paterno’s hey day; every three years or so you have a legitimate shot at a championship. We should be able to get enough quality players who want to come or stay that we can get this done.
by Ivan Cole (RickVa) on Feb 11, 2009 7:05 PM EST reply actions
Essex
Good call on Tomlin’s appreciation of Essex. Tomlin has stressed position flexibility all year. I think Essex, despite being less than impressive sticks with the team because of his ability to jump in anywhere.
by SteelerBuddha on Feb 12, 2009 11:04 AM EST up reply actions
Great write up Blitz
I have been thinking about where Hills fits into the tackle equations. I agree with many of your points.
+1
Excellent post and my thoughtages
Personally I think Starks will garner medium interest but likely can be had for 4-5 million. Which I think is a steal.
He commits few penalties, can maul people, and plays smart. Not amazing but still pretty good overall. And damn durable.
You are correct Colon likely returns, and while I hate em and he stanks hes dirt cheap.
To me, I could see Starks re-taking the RT and having Hills and Colon duke it out for LT. Or vice-versa.
As far as interior goes. I would like to see the Stapler stay in, and hopefully draft a LG and let go of Kemo.
Jordan Gross and Vernon Carey
I would let Starks, Smith, Kemeatou, and Essex walk and try to sign both a starting RT and LT and draft a lineman that can cover guard and center.
Both of them are 27 years old with plenty of tread and proven performance. Starks ($6.9 mln), Smith ($4.6 mln) and Kematuou ($1.4 mln) and Trai Esses (1.0 mln) – Total of $14 mln to spread to 2 outstanding tackles.
Put Colon at guard along with Stapleton or Simmons, back up with Hill/Colon and 4th or 5th round lineman or low price free agent. We also have Parquet who looks ready to play. Met his family at the SB.
Yet still
I don’t see Starks here next year. For some reason the coaches don’t seem to have any confidence on him. Two years later and I still don’t see how he lost his right tackle job to Colon and when he was brought back he was not allowed to compete for the job even though Colon struggled.
I think he’s a slightly better left tackle than right and for me he showed that when Smith went down the first time yet this season when Smith went down again it was Essex who was thrown in with a reason having to do with a better ability against the speed rusher (as if Starks hadn’t faced elite speed rushers before and go on to face a few more). My suspicion at the time was it was Essex who was getting the reps against the first team D and not Starks and therefore more practiced in the game plan to be tossed in.
Starks was pretty decent in two successful Super Bowl runs and I thank him sincerely for that but if the coaching staff doesn’t have the confidence it’s best we part ways and I wish him the best of luck.
p.s. Hills starts the preseason as our LT. Can Parquet be our RT?
by Marvin, The Paranoid Android on Feb 12, 2009 6:45 PM EST reply actions

by 



















