All Things TE Heath Miller - A Comprehensive Look Back And Forward
The Pittsburgh Steelers are a much more dangerous offensive football team when QB Ben Roethlisberger is looking TE Heath Miller's way by design more than just a handful of times per game.
Here were Miller's final 2008 statistics:
Miller set a career high in receptions in 2008, but he average the fewest yards per reception of his career, and for the fourth time in as many years failed to reach the 50 reception plateau. The 3 TDs were also a career low
Top 10 TE RECEPTION LEADERS IN 2008 (PASSES THROWN TO):
1) Tony Gonzalez - 96 receptions (155)
2 ) Chris Cooley - 83 receptions (111)

3) Jason Witten - 81 receptions (120)
4) Dallas Clark - 77 receptions (107)
5) Owen Daniels -70 receptions (100)
6) Antonio Gates - 60 receptions (92)
7) Bo Scaiffe - 58 receptions (84)
8) Zach Miller - 56 receptions (86)
9) Greg Olson - 55 receptions (82)
10) Jon Carlson - 54 receptions (80)
Heath Miller - 48 receptions (65)
**********
TOP CATCH % OF RECEPTION LEADERS (DVOA RANK, min 50 passes)
1) Chris Cooley - 75% (18)
2) Heath Miller - 74% (7)
4) Owen Daniels - 70% (9)
5) Bo Scaiffe - 69% (24)
6) John Carlson - 69% (10)
7) Jason Witten - 68% (11)
8) Greg Olson - 66% (25)
9) Zach Miller - 65% (16)
10) Antonio Gates - 65% (13)
11) Tony Gonzalez - 61% (14)
**********
2008 STATISTICAL ANALYSIS
Surprise, surprise --it would have been nice to get Heath the ball more. I really should feel just fine stopping there, as the numbers tell the story. When Ben throws the ball to Heath Miller, good things happen. His catch % is the second highest in the league of anyone thrown the ball more than 50 times. And as measured by DVOA, Miller performed better in 2008 in the situations presented to him better than did the 11 guys who finished 2008 with more receptions. Can I even recommend forcing the ball to him occasionally if that's what it takes?
**********
MOVING FORWARD - SALARY AND FREE AGENCY CONSIDERATIONS
Heath will be a free agent at the end of the 2009 season, meaning that historically, this would be the offseason that the front office would decide whether or not to re-sign Miller to an extension that would likely make him one of the top 5-7 TEs in the game. How much might that cost? Let's take a look at what some of the more highly paid TEs in the league earned in 2008.
Top 10 TE Cap Hits In 2008 (Not base salary, but cap hit)
1) Tony Gonzalez (Kansas City)- $5.03 million
2) Kellen Winslow, Jr. (Cleveland) - $4.599 million
3) L.J. Smith (Philadelphia) - $4.523 million
4) Antonio Gates (San Diego) - $4.2 million
5) Daniel Graham (Denver) - $4.15 million
6) Jason Witten (Dallas) - $4.11 million
7) Randy McMichael (St. Louis) - $3.9 million
8) Jim Kleinsasser (Who the hell?) - $3.85 million
9) Todd Heap (Baltimore) - $3.5 million
10) Vernon Davis (San Francisco) - $3.34 million
Contracts Worth Looking At - Extensions Following Rookie Contracts
Chris Cooley (26 years) - signed 6-year $30 million ($11 mil. signing bonus)
Jason Witten (26 years) - signed 6-year $29 million ($6 mil. signing bonus) in 2006
Antonio Gates (28 years) - signed 6-year $24 million ($6 mil. signing bonus) in 2005
Daniel Graham (30 years) - signed 5-year $30 million ($10 mil. signing bonus) in 2007
Dallas Clark (29 years) - signed 6-year $36 million ($11 mil. signing bonus) in 2008
Heath Miller (26 years) - ?????????????
We'll see what happens, but for what it's worth only Dallas Clark and Daniel Graham were not re-signed in the month of August right around the start of training camp. So don't be surprised if it doesn't happen, if it does at all, until after free agency and the draft.
Believe me, I want Heath Miller in the fold in Pittsburgh for his entire career, but if there's tough choices to be made between him and other more pressing positional needs, I will be able to live with a decision to not re-up the talented work-horse out of Virginia. Remember, the Rooney and Colbert drafted Matt Spaeth a few years ago, most likely as a viable contingency plan to fill in for Heath if salary cap considerations forced their hand.
84 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Re-sign Miller
Injuries are slowing down Ward. Awesome as he is, how much longer can he be a #1/#2 guy?
Holmes dropped passes and broke off routes the first half of the season: Washington had actually surpassed him as the #2 receiver and top deep threat about six games into the season. He has had off-field issues (domestic violence and drug arrests) and resembles Plax more than Ward to me (as an OSU grad, I’ve seen a lot of Holmes).
Washington is a free agent.
Sweed is no sure bet based on his last year in college and rookie year in Pittsburgh (my wife is a Longhorn alum and I watched a lot of Sweed in college).
Spaeth does have a lot of potential, but he doesn’t get yards after the catch (which is at least partly because he always seems to be catching the ball facing Big Ben).
We need to keep Miller, and to use him more. The passing game would take a significant hit if he were not on the roster.
feeling whoooseey!
reading your last paragraph Blitz… FO would be making a GRAVE mistake letting Heath go! There’s nothing Heath can’t do and the only reason he’s not mentioned in the same breath as Gonzo, Witten, ClarK, etc is we don’t throw to him like their teams do. Spaeth is not even in the same atmosphere! ….. can’t talk any more… about to pass out thinking of this one
+1
Spaeth is a second string TE on any team. He is as slow as the Second Coming and is a weak blocker. Miller is so much better it’s not even a comparison. 4 reasons Miller doesn’t get the ball more:
1) He was used early in Ben’s career as a safe, short route receiver. Defenses see that and then take it away. I’d say that’s about 50% of the reason he is getting fewer receptions and yds.
2) The outside receivers are better and get more receptions because of the above. As their productivity rises, Ben naturally goes to them more. Also, coverage dictates where the ball gets thrown. Until recently, Steelers had no real outside deep threat – so more coverage was directed to Miller. Now with Holmes and Washington – they have two guys who can create space for themselves and get open underneath. Probably 30-40 %.
3) Roethlisburger played in a shotgun spread offense in college, so TE play was not a focus. Habits and muscle-memory are hard to break. About 10%.
4) Miller’s injuries and missed time. Less reps in practice, less familiarity and confidence in those plays. I don’t think there is a lack of confidence in the man. About 10 %.
I want the guy resigned more than most of the others. He is critical in the run game and is a good ‘catcher of the football’ – the guy is reliable. Losing him will hurt every facet of their offense.
"Franz" in NoCal
I Disagree on Spaeth
I think that Spaeth is a capable replacement for Miller. Maybe I haven’t been watching as closely as you, but I thought Spaeth did a terrific job when Heath was injured for a few games this season.
That said, Heath Miller is a real weapon, and he has really come through in the playoffs in 05/06 and 08/09. I hope we can resign him, but if we do, I hope that we can get him into our gameplan a little bit more often.
Yeah but
BA loves the 2TE set, so we really need 2 starting TEs. I would rather keep Heath and let Spaeth walk in favor of a vet runblocking TE.
If you consider Miller underutilized then Spaeth is even more neglected.
More than just a receiver
I think Heath was needed to bolster the O-line this year. Had the linemen been able to manage things on their own, we might’ve seen him used in the endzone more often. Though, I cannot fathom why Arians has Ben tossing to Davis along the goal line instead of Heath.
Completely unrelated remark: Miller had a step or two on his defender and was wayyy upfield when Hartwig got plowed for the safety. I don’t think there was anything between him and the other endzone. In the land of Shoulda Coulda that would have been a brilliant throw.
Miller was blocking
You can see Miller blocking at the line of scrimmage near the end of the safety play. Might be thinking of Nate Washington, who was going deep.
http://www.nfl.com/videos
click on SUPER BOWL under ‘Browse Videos.’ It’s the 36th clip (End of the third screen).
As a matter of fact
If keeping Heath means… good-bye Willie, Hartwig, Deshea, Keisel, Essex, Snack, Foote, Marvel, Nate, Kemo, Batch, Lefty, Roye, Burger, Bryant etc… then i’m good with that! I think all these dudes can be replaced easily (except for Foote and what he adds to this team in all aspects, but the Nation will cry Timmons on this one, which i’m good with too). I think Heath is that important to the success of this team!
ill take snack over heath
I think we can win a SB in 2010 without Heath. Not so sure about Casey. We need to keep this defense dominant for the next year-4 years and hope our offense can deliver a couple more times for us.
Remember, if we’re going to allocate resources to improving the offensive line, then investments have to be made to keep hard to replace positions like potential Hall of Famers like Casey Hampton. Hamptons got good years left too. Can’t let him go.
by Michael Bean on Feb 12, 2009 11:09 AM EST up reply actions
I dunno
Snack’s declining and we’ve seen Hoke fill in there. Hoke’s getting older too, but I think we could fill that spot with young talent through draft or low level free agent.
I agree that with Hines slowing we need possession, and Heath gives us that in Spades. Spaeth is not an adequate replacement.
by Chicago Steeler on Feb 12, 2009 11:53 AM EST up reply actions
why is hines slowing?
top ten WR by football outsiders metrics this past year. 7th best total value and 11th best value per play. Age is a number. If his knee’s not a huge concern, I dont understand the logic of him being done at all. But I’ll move on from that for now.
As for TE – in his two games starting, Spaeth caught 6 passes each game for a total of 12.
by Michael Bean on Feb 12, 2009 12:01 PM EST up reply actions
How many drops did Hines have?
The end results are what matters, but the amount of drops Hines has had are concerning, not that our other receivers are a shining beacon of hope in that department. Hines proved to any doubters (including me) his worth this year, but his hands are slipping. He makes the catches in “the clutch”, but I want him to do more than that.
Don't worry about the haters. Haters only hate.
meh
Hines had 7 drops (14th most)
Holmes had 6.
S Moss, B Edwards, TO, G Jennings, Calvin Johnson, Roddy White, Dwayne Bowe, Brandon Marshall, Lav, Coles, Marques Colston, M Muhammed all had more drops than Hiines.
What’s the big deal again?
by Michael Bean on Feb 12, 2009 12:37 PM EST up reply actions
The deal is that as far as I know Hines did not used to drop the ball this much. Is this a big deal? No, but don’t dismiss this point (while ragging on Hines/Nate below in this thread for it) as non-trivial just because you love Hines so much.
Don't worry about the haters. Haters only hate.
haha
its just inaccurate to say that Hines has a case of the drops and that its alarming. 7 drops with well over 100 balls thrown his way. id bet that at least 5 or 6 of those 7 came in the first half of the season too. will check someday soon.
by Michael Bean on Feb 12, 2009 1:25 PM EST up reply actions
I would also want to see vid of these drops
How many were Limas-Sweed-in-your-hands drops, as opposed to slightly uncatchable kinds?
yea, def
And also lots came when our whole offense was just out of sync and nowhere near close to clicking. Effected even savvy veterans with Zero history of dropping the ball.
by Michael Bean on Feb 12, 2009 1:49 PM EST up reply actions
I’m not sure that we need to laugh at each others points.
I never said he had a case of the drops, but it is a fact that he dropped the ball. To steelersVT point, a lot of them were very catchable. To blitzburgh’s point, you’re right that most of the drops came in the first half of the season. I can’t remember one in the last 8 games or so. I don’t know that Hines had the ball thrown his way “well over 100” times, maybe about 100?
From the stats, Hines does not seem to be slipping. His numbers are huge. The fact is that he dropped more balls this year than previous years (or I think it’s a fact), and that he has been more prone to getting physically injured the last couple of years. This isn’t about measuring Hines against other players for me, it’s about measuring Hines against himself in the past. His numbers are there but the drops have increased and his durability has decreased. This, for Hines, IS alarming. I can’t see Hines going anywhere, but there are visible changes in his game that would be silly to ignore.
Don't worry about the haters. Haters only hate.
Durability?
He started all 19 games didn’t he? How much more durable do you want the guy to be? With his physical style I’m amazed he doesn’t miss more time.
I want him to be superman. Hines ward has one of the most absurd track records of starting up until 2005. From that year on he has continued to miss 1 game, 2 games, 3 games. This year he stayed pretty healthy until the end where he toughed it out like no other player I can think of. He has been getting dinged a lot though and sits out practices frequently, not that I’m of the opinion that missing them hurts his game.
I am comparing Hines to Hines though. The clear trend over the past few years shows that he is getting older, because, well, he is. It is impressive that he doesn’t miss more the way he played.
The whole point here is:
HInes drops balls more than he used to.
Hines gets injured more than he used to.
These two things are facts. Does he drop the ball too much? No. Does he spend more time injured than he should for how he plays? No. Would it be better if Hines never dropped the ball and was never injured? Yes.
Don't worry about the haters. Haters only hate.
It would be better if I were dating three pornstars
But I’ll take what I got. I’ll take Hines too.
I get your point, and I really can’t argue with anything because Hines is getting older, as are all of us. I hope he keeps playing forever but I know it can’t happen. I do think he has 2 very good years left in him though. Hell, if Mason can still give our D fits at 36, then Hines should be good until he’s 50.
mason
I look at a guy like Mason as solid evidence that Hines can continue to produce. That and despite my nitpicking he refuses to have a bad season even though some would already consider him to be “over the hill”.
Speaking of Mason, the ravens got a pretty good signing out of him.
My new favorite toy: http://content.usatoday.com/sports/football/nfl/salaries/default.aspx
Don't worry about the haters. Haters only hate.
Spaeth can’t block at all.
When Spaeth stepped in for a game as starter though he did pretty nicely. Not much YAC, but he was money catching the ball and got a lot of looks from Ben. Other than the blown TD catch he could have had he has pretty good hands too.
Don't worry about the haters. Haters only hate.
Kleinsasser
I noticed a distinct lack of name recognition on Jim Kleinsasser (I believe he got a who the hell?). I’m actually a Kleinsasser fan. If you read my post on potential free agent grabs, I have him on the short list.
The only reason his cap hit was so large is because he was on the last year of a fairly long deal, paying him the most on the last year.
He is a really good blocker, has pretty good hands and can play TE or FB, think Sean McHugh with much better blocking ability. I think he would bring some much needed blocking, and good hands at FB, at a fairly cheap price.
by NYSteelersFan4 on Feb 12, 2009 11:09 AM EST reply actions
as a pretty big fan and year round writer
i can honestly say ive never heard of the guy. not that that means anything.
im unable to get to every fan post like id like to – but i’ll be sure to check yours out. thanks for mentioning it.
by Michael Bean on Feb 12, 2009 11:10 AM EST up reply actions
Big Jim
Was much more involved in Minnesota’s offense a couple years ago. Before Shiancoe came to town. Played FB a couple of years, TE a couple more. Versitile, tough, maybe past his prime, but more than servicable. I like his ability to fit in and do what we ask of a FB. Motion out or in, find a guy and put him on the ground, or as a checkdown, catch the ball and impose his will on the defender.
by NYSteelersFan4 on Feb 12, 2009 11:18 AM EST up reply actions
Career Numbers
Not anything that blows you away, but had a few good years with decent production
by NYSteelersFan4 on Feb 12, 2009 11:26 AM EST up reply actions
Like Klein
The Saucer is pretty good. Watching lot’s of NFC North football I’ve seen him do impressive things. He’s starting to wind down though… Very similar to McHugh in style of play.
by Chicago Steeler on Feb 12, 2009 11:54 AM EST up reply actions
Don't forget
where Tomlin came from, he know’s this guy, I really think there is a good chance he’s in a Steeler uniform next year. But yes, his very best years are behind him.
by NYSteelersFan4 on Feb 12, 2009 12:03 PM EST up reply actions
Re-Sign Heath
Long term, this guy has the ability to be one of the best tight ends in football. It seems to me that when he gets the touches, we move the rock. He’s got great hands, can block like a linemen and always seems to be there when we need him.
I could see him stepping into that 3rd down first option spot that Hines has now. I think Ben needs to look his way a little bit more. As much as holding onto the ball helps our receivers get open, sometimes you just have to get it to a guy and let him get 5 yards, maybe break one and get that first down. Heath is that guy.
by NYSteelersFan4 on Feb 12, 2009 11:14 AM EST up reply actions
Heath can't freaking block
The more I have to say this, the more it aggravates the hell out of me because I don’t want to badmouth our guys, but I feel that a little reality must be injected here. Heath has never been a good run blocker. He will, on occasion, seal the edge on a running play. But he gets taken to the wood shed as often as Senor Colon.
So in that sense I guess you are right. He does block like one of our O linemen.
His hands are a thing of beauty though. Top 5 receiving TE in the league, no question. I’m with you on that much.
It seems like every year we complain about Heath not getting enough touches, but at whose expense should he get passes over? Ward, Holmes, Washington? I don’t think so. So remember that there are only so many footballs to go around.
As far as re-signing him? Like every player the Steelers want to keep, they’ll make him a reasonable offer to try and keep him, but they won’t break the bank for a TE. And yes, Spaeth did a decent job of filling in for Heath, especially in the SD game. But there is no doubt that there is a drop off to Spaeth from Miller.
how about Nate Washington??
He had 78 passes thrown his way – caught only 51% of them. Only Santonio and a few others had a lower catch % than did Nate around the league amongst the top 80-100 WRs.
So, there’s 10 more passes of Heath. And maybe Ben needs to listen to Tone a little less if he’s always asking for the ball.
We’re so much better when he gets thrown to.
by Michael Bean on Feb 12, 2009 11:27 AM EST up reply actions
+1
Never a huge Nate fan, but I’m by no means a hater. Just too inconsistent. Makes great plays down field, but not regularly.
But he could be an afterthought now, free agent I believe.
by NYSteelersFan4 on Feb 12, 2009 11:32 AM EST up reply actions
I don’t think anyone doubts that Heath has better hands than Nate. He probably has the best hands on the team. But you are comparing a receiver who gets a lot of balls thrown to him downfield, which are a lower percentage play and are harder to catch to a TE who gets most of his catches closer to the LOS.
true, true
But it doesnt change the fact that the 51% for Nate and 48% for Tone are quite a bit lower than all their peers around the league, all the way down to very marginal WRs. Heath on the other hand, catches a higher % than anybody, yet gets the ball a ridiculously small number of looks disproportionate to how much we throw.
by Michael Bean on Feb 12, 2009 12:13 PM EST up reply actions
Yeah I follow
Well, we may get the chance to see more of Nate’s balls going Heath’s way next year if 85 leaves Sixburgh for a pay day. I am all in favor of throwing the ball to Heath more often though. It sure beats an outside running play to his side.
I think Nate is a pretty good 3rd option
But I hate the fact that he seems a little soft. A lot of the passes he dropped this year, he could have had if he put a little more Chutzpah in taking the ball away from DBs.
by BallsofSteel on Feb 12, 2009 1:55 PM EST up reply actions
I have to defend 85 here
A lot of those incompletions were just poorly thrown deep balls from Ben. I know he dropped his share, but a lot of those were on Ben.
re-up heath!
plain and simple, heath miller is a football player’s football player. he’s all the things many of you have mentioned above: tough, dependable, versatile. how many of us were shocked when he dropped that second and goal pass from ben in the 3rd quarter of the super bowl? we were shocked because it’s shocking to see the man make a negative play. as hines slows down, miller’s value to the offense will only increase. he and ben appear to have a strong bond and that’s important too.
most important, however, is this: heath miller is a steeler. he does things the steeler way. if the steelers truly value the type of players and people they profess to (and i think the track record says they do), they’ll resign him. he’s a heart-and-soul guy. when i think of the bedrocks of this 2005-2008 run that has produced rings five and six, i think foremost of big ben, of troy p, of hines and of the linebackers. heath miller is the other guy i add to that group. this is a core player whose contributions to this team have been essential and who is entering his prime. you have to re-up heath!
by weegie thompson lives! on Feb 12, 2009 11:26 AM EST reply actions
only if we use him more
He’s not worth the huge bucks if Arians isnt going to throw him the ball more. Unless Heath wants to accept a smallish deal compared to what someone else will pay him, it makes no sense to pay him a 10+ mil signing bonus to throw him the ball 40% fewer times than the top TEs get. Either offense changes or makes little sense.
by Michael Bean on Feb 12, 2009 11:29 AM EST up reply actions 1 recs
No kidding
BA needs to realize that he has a Jason Witten-caliber pass catcher on his team and he’s not designing any part of his offense around him. For a “genius,” he sure is pretty dense.
agreed, however...
there’s a good chance nate is gone in free agency and hines has maybe two good years left. if you let miller go you lose 3/4 of your receiving group in two years. yes, they have to get him the ball more, and no they shouldn’t overpay for him. but i can’t see him making outrageous salary demands (when santonio is up in two years you’ll certainly see some!). plus, we throw the ball so much less than other teams that the stat about him seeing 40% less balls than other top TE’s is a bit misleading. he’s integral to what we want to do on offense, and as the core group changes around him (WR’s and O-line) the stability he provides will be huge…
by weegie thompson lives! on Feb 12, 2009 11:37 AM EST reply actions
pass attempts - not all teams threw more. yet ALL got more looks than heath
Washington – 510; 4 more than Pittsburgh
KC – 541; 35 more attempts
Dallas – 547; 41 more attempts
Houston – 555; 49 more attempts
San Diego – 478; 28 fewer attempts
Oakland – 421 ; 85 fewer attempts
Oakland – 528; 22 more attempts
Tennessee – 453; 53 fewer attempts
Indy – 585; 79 more attempts
Seattle – 474; 32 fewer attempts
Just doesnt add up.
by Michael Bean on Feb 12, 2009 11:50 AM EST up reply actions
Heath MUST be re-signed
We’ll probably lose Hines in the next 2-3 years so Big Ben needs ATLEAST one security blanket. Santonio is simply not a reliable catcher, neither is Nate, and lets not even talk about Sweed.
We need someone to move the chains on 3rd and short,.. and with an offense currently filled with questions, Heath Miller is the only sure thing among the younger players. A bird in the hand.
Arians
Arians will never use TE’s and RB’s as much as he should in the passing game. Heath’s a terrible blockers, so if Arians doesn’t get fired, there’s no reason to sign Heath to a large contract.
charity standing orders
Terrible?
I’d agree that we sometimes give him too much credit for being a complete TE, but I feel like for a good pass-catching TE he’s above average at blocking. He doesn’t often get a lot of drive, but can create a good seal.
by Chicago Steeler on Feb 12, 2009 11:56 AM EST up reply actions
Heath is NOT a terrible blocker
He’s above average at the very least.
He really isn’t. Heath is average and inconsistent. Some games he does well, some game he looks like Spaeth. He is not reliable at all, and saying he is “above average at the very least” just is not true.
I’ve heart it parroted all year long that Miller is “great at blocking”. Our TEs inability to seal the edge hurts our running game, and our TEs are not good at chipping on the way out. Heath is light years better than Spaeth, but he is not a good blocker. He’s OK.
Don't worry about the haters. Haters only hate.
Crap
You beat me to it. Heath is adequate at times and horrible at times. It really depends on who he’s assigned to block. Suggs and Jarret Johnson tore him a new asshole this year (like they do every year). But, he pretty much had his way with Wimbley and McGinest (most plays at least’; and moreso with Kam than Willie) in the last game.
IMO, his pass-catching more than makes up for his less-than-stellar runblocking though.
And Blitzburgh
I disagree with your point about Heath’s number of catches not warranting a big contract,…its no the quantity of catches but the quality. Per catch, I don’t think there is a TE that brings more value. All his catches seem to be crucial third down/chain moving catches. Spaeth seems to have good hands but he didn’t really move the chains.
you didnt get my logic
I’m saying he’s not worth paying top dollar unless we’re going to involve him more. Not saying he doesnt deserve the money because he hasnt caught more passes. I’m saying he DOES deserve the money – if not from us, from someone – because hes so damn talented. But if we’re going to be the ones paying him that top dollar in his next contract, we better use him more.
Thats different than what you’re saying I said.
by Michael Bean on Feb 12, 2009 12:03 PM EST up reply actions
essential
i guess the thing i hope the steelers don’t miss is this: there are certain types of guys you simply need on your football team no matter what the stats say. if you’re the steelers, you need guys like heath miller. he might not be as essential in san diego or indy because of how they play, but he’s essential here. i’m positive we’ll regret it if we let him walk…
by weegie thompson lives! on Feb 12, 2009 12:23 PM EST reply actions
SPAETH is the terrible blocker...too tall...not quick enough...
…and you can’t teach height or quickness.
Blitz is right that Heath doesn’t get enough touches…and that’s a factor in what you pay a guy (and why we let Randle El go), but his blocking is far better than Spaeth, and his game is superior in every other way.
One key in what you pay a guy is his value over/under replacement player. And the drop-off from Miller to Spaeth is considerable. Taking into account the problems with the OL, the Steelers can’t risk getting even weaker up front.
Re-sign Heath
Blitz I totally understand where you are coming from in your basic argument, which is that in our offense Heath’s talents are under-utilized and therefore should not be overpaid relative to his contribution.
But I think we have to separate the player from the offense in this case, at least to some degree. We suffer enough on the playing field with Arians as OC, I don’t think we should be making important personnel decisions about our most talented players (especially the most reliable receiver) based on an offense that is inefficient. There is no way Arians should outlast Heath as a member of the Steeler organization.
Heath has 6-8 more years as a productive player and it could be argued his best years are still ahead of him. Even if he just maintains his current level of productivity over a long period of time, it would be money well spent to make him one of the top five paid tight ends in the league. He’s not as explosive as some TEs and he’s far from the best blocking TE, but the overall package I think puts him in the top five. There is a considerable drop-off to Spaeth, who will become a better blocker than he is right now with more experience, but will never come close to matching Heath not only in terms of productivity, but in forcing opposing defenses to respect the threat he represents. If we’re going to run an effective balanced offense (which is great in theory), then all components must be threats.
After Harrison, I think re-signing Heath is the second most important player among the 2010 free agent group to extend now. I agree with extending Hines also right now, but all the rest can wait until next off-season.
just to be clear here
I’m not contending we should NOT re-sign him. Never hinted as much. At least in the post. Just provided a bunch of numbers that took me a while to compile. And concluded with a non opinionated statement that Heath could be out the door if the front office is in a bind salary cap wise after this offseason’s early developments.
I too want Heath back. Badly. I’m just not sure it’s so wise because of the reason Franz gave about Big Ben not naturally being inclined to look his way and because of the offensive coordinator we have.
by Michael Bean on Feb 12, 2009 1:53 PM EST up reply actions
arians
What I don’t get about Arians is his lovefest with tight ends. He loves having Heath and Spaeth in there to block and be receiving options, but the two of them are so rarely designed to be the receivers. Spaeth adds nothing to the game by blocking, and while Heath can block with gusto on occasion, unless we are running the ball I want him to chip and get to the second level.
Arians version of the 2-TE set has been an abysmal failure. Don’t get me started on the 3-TE set.
Don't worry about the haters. Haters only hate.
You mean the "loss of one" set?
It seems like we lose yardage every time we’re in 3TE, unless McHugh motions as a FB.
Oh, Bruce, you sly devil.
Seriously
It has gotten to the point where Ol Billy Hilgrove will start saying “and the give is to Parker and he’s gonna be dropped for a loss on the play” before the ball is even snapped.
It’s like Billy and Tunch have been taking lessons from Miss Cleo or something. Crazy.
I mean
I understand the appeal of the set, because with a good line and good blocking TEs it really creates a challenge for the defense. There are 7 inside gaps to control with a 3 TE set vs. only 5 for a normal 1 TE set. With a back like FWP that should mean lots of opportunities for big gains if the blocking scheme holds up, because against a base 7 man front if there are 2 defenders assigned to outside contain you should theoretically have 2 open gaps in the line (or 1 uncovered with an 8 man front).
The trouble is, with our OL and TEs, it really just creates 2 extra gaps for the opposing defense to come crashing through and nail Willie before he takes his first cut. So sorta the opposite of what it’s supposed to do.
Acknowledged
As far as value to the team, it’s more important to have a Pro Bowl quality NT anchoring our defense than a Pro Bowl quality TE complementing our offense. Age and future productivity enter into the equation comparing Casey to Heath, and Heath is just entering his best years while Casey’s at the tail end of his best years. I think we can wait a year and still have a great chance to re-sign Casey. Less than half the NFL runs a 3-4 so competition for him won’t be as great, at his age, than a young TE who can play for anybody. I want them both!!!
by steeler.lifer on Feb 12, 2009 4:35 PM EST up reply actions
Heath and Hines
Heath Miller is a blue chip tight end that draws coverage away from the wide receivers even when they’re not throwing his way. He’s also a tough underneath option that I believe to be a notch above Spaeth (no disrespect intended). The guy has incredible hands and toughness that the Steelers cannot afford to lose. I saw sideline footage of Ray Lewis screaming at his defensive backs coach because they let Heath run lose beneath the secondary. Clearly they are concerned about Heath and his influence extends beyond the numbers. I doubt they get that same concern with Spaeth.
Hines Ward is still a top receiver. His drops were probably maginified this year because the offense was so sporadic and every catch was vital to keeping a drive alive. Although he may be edging towards the number 3 WR spot ( if Sweed blossoms) but he will always be a factor.
Casey Hampton has gone from a Pro Bowl nose tackle to a solid veteran, but the truth is that Chris Hoke played almost as well when he filled in. If we were talking about losing Albert Haynseworth I might sacrifice Heath Miller, but at this stage I think you have to look long term and Heath is probably more in line with that.
Heath
Imo, he is a must re-sign. Not even a question for me. As far as his blocking, all I know is I’ve heard/read Cowher, Tomlin and others call him the best blocking TE in the league. Add in his vastly under rated receiving ability, unselfishness, toughness, team first attitude and you have one of the best all around TE’s in the game. Again, a must re-sign for me.
Spaeth. To me, not even close being worth a 3rd round pick. Too tall, too slow, average hands, nothing special about him at all.
Hampton. I love him. Hope we can re-sign him to a moderate contract next year. He would not be worth a mega contract at this point in hs career.
Why is he a must re-sign?
I love his reliability in the passing game, sure, but an NFL team must be very fluid in its approach to talent acquisition. Three years ago, Pitt had a stud offensive line and now they don’t. But they won the SB then and now. You have to be prepared to drop increasingly expensive talent from one of your strong positions while you’re developing or acquiring talent to improve another position. It’s not that important to get hung up on a particular player… unless it’s Hines, or Ben, or Troy.
Who knew?
Because it would be a good investment
Yes you have to be fluid in approach. But the reason TE is a strong position now is because Heath is here; if we don’t have him, it’s a weak position. You always have to try to protect your assets and Heath is definitely an asset, with plenty of good years ahead of him. It also makes more sense to extend him now before he becomes a free agent. Next year it will be much more difficult and probably TOO expensive to keep him. Actually, if I’m his agent, I would advise against getting an extension for that very reason. If Heath likes being in Pittsburgh then now is the time to get a deal worked out.
Why is he a must sign?
Our front office has always done a great job of identifying its core nucleus of talent and signing them to extensions.
Imo, Heath is one of their core nucleus of players that you win SB’s with.
I agree “it’s important not to get hung up on a particular player”. But it’s also equally important to identify who your best players are and work diligently to keep them.
We will find out in the coming months who the front office prioritizes.
Disagree...
Spaeth may be a contingency plan, but he only brings half of the game Miller does. Spaeth has solid hands, but he lacks the run after catch ability as well as the blocking ability that Miller brings to the table. Letting Miller go would be an enormous mistake and I think the Steelers know that. They would be more willing to pay a top TE salary than say a top end WR salary, so I don’t think it will happen…but I couldn’t disagree with you more. Losing Miller would leave a gaping hole in the Steelers Offense, a hole we can’t afford to lose any time soon.
by Heckler's Sports on Feb 12, 2009 9:17 PM EST reply actions
Heath To Get Extension -- Will Deebo, BMac & Starks beat him to the trough first?
Guys,
No need to fret, worry or fear because UNDERDOG …. er DATRUTH is here!!!!! Heath will get his paper at training camp, and here’s why:
5 – He is an all-pro player in skill, does things the Steeler Way, still has a lot of upside, and is coming off of his first contract with the team.
4 – The Rooneys and Kevin Colbert love the kid and realize his true value. Believe me, he will get a second contract with this team before Hines, Big Snack and Kiesel get a third.
3 – You don’t pay $100M for a franchise QB and not give him a security blanket on the field (not to mention his roommate during training camp as well).
2 – Heath is just as effective in the running game as he is the passing game and this team is serious about fixing that OL this offseason. The best way to protect Big Ben is not overpaying for Jordan Gross at LT. It’s putting enough quality big uglies out there so Ben can spend more time handing off than dropping back. Both Tomlin and Colbert know this (More on this and other free agent and draft tidbits to come).
1 – Heath opitimizes what a true Steeler is and how the Rooneys do business. He’s fearless, tough, talented, a model worker, player and citizen and isn’t called BIG MONEY for nothing. The Steelers don’t draft them in the first round, let them become stars and then let them leave after completing their first contract (Now asking for the third conract when you are 30 years old and missing time because of injuries is a whole different story).
- This is the order the Steelers need to take care of before free agency hits this month (DaTruth is assuming Deebo will get his money similar to the way the Steelers did with Ben this past year, get it out the way early and concentrate on the other players):
1 – BMac
2 – Starks
3 – Fox
4 – Essex
5 – Washington (Nate is last because he’s not going to take 3rd WR money, which is what he is. He’s had a lot of opportunities during the past 2 years to show that he could be more and he simply didn’t produce on that level).
DaTruth will bow out with this draft tidbit to the uninitiated: K. Colbert could not have fallen into a better draft to accomplish his two main priorities for this draft: Rebuilding and Restocking the Offensive and Defensive lines. Nine draft picks to get it right.
Who wants more?
i do i do!
Good stuff. You have capabilities DT, throw them up on main page if you want.
by Michael Bean on Feb 13, 2009 1:06 AM EST up reply actions
oh
And I totally agree about B-Mac, though I think we’re basically in a huge minority there.
by Michael Bean on Feb 13, 2009 1:07 AM EST up reply actions
agree with re-signing fox pronto
he was getting reps in the game against the browns – I think there’s a real possibility the steelers see him as Potsie’s successor. (as I think you said in your fp post)
I like it!
I like it a lot and I couldn’t agree more! I’m hoping the first priority this year is drafting the O-line in the 1st and 2nd round. After that I think we can take the best available D-lineman. The following year we can focus on D-line in the first round.
Blitz, please post as individual story
I’d appreciate it. Thanks.
I agree
This posting deserves to have it’s own headline! Well Done Truth, Well Done!!!!! Personally I hope they get Alex Mack. The guy oozes potential and would be a great anchor for years to come.
I’m curious though…what’s your opinion of last years pick, Tony Hills? Seems like he was a wasted pick but it’s early for him so I’m not sure if that’s a fair assessment. He just seemed like a finesse guy which is clearly not what the Steelers need. Any chance he contributes next season?
Jury is out on Hills
Steev1705, what up!
I’m not sure about Tony Hills. Unless a player shows me that they can, then I kind of assume that they can’t. I’m more higher on Capizzi than Hills because I’ve seen Capizzi play. He has amazing feet to be someone so big and he only needed to stay healthy and work on his strength to make this team. He’s had two years to work on his strength and now has another offseason with the Steelers coaches to work on his game. And if he makes the team, the Steelers have him for another 3 years before they have to make a decision on paying him. That could end up being another great value get. With the changes coming, I think he could be a good swing tackle for this club.
As far as Hills, I just don’t know. He didn’t look good at all going against Deebo in training camp, whereas Capizzi stopped Deebo, Kiesel and Kirschke during one-on-ones back in training camp before he got hurt. I think we are all hoping Hills will come through and show us something. Thanks for your feedback on the article.

by 

















