Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Super Bowl Recipes: A Guide To The Perfect Game Day Menu

Reaching Seventh Heaven - A Guide To The Pittsburgh Steelers 2009 Offseason

The following was sent to me via email by DaTruth4Life. There's no better 'meat and potatoes' roster analyst than datruth. Period. Sometimes I wonder if the offseason is more enjoyable to him and a few others than is the actual season! Way beyond the call of duty here from him and a fantastic master guide to reference moving forward. Talk it up BTSC with your feedback! -Blitz-

********************

So, who out there wants Seven? Read closely as the DaTruth takes your through free agency and this year’s draft and will show you why this team will be hosting a seventh “sticky-icky” Lombardi trophy this time next year. And Blitz, I got a few goodies for you up in here, too. And by the way, Can we continue to party like it’s 2009 and put all comers to sleep like S Ryan Clark? Yes We Can! Yes We Can! Yes We Can! Let’s get to it.

Those who regularly peruse this board knows DaTruth and what He brings to the table. DaTruth can only give it to you one way — straight with no chaser! Bottoms Up!

A lot of people have praised the Rooneys and Mike Tomlin for the job that they have done in winning this sixth championship. And both parites deserve their kudos and props. But while we’re at it, can we also give a little love to the best scouting department in the NFL? This team’s scouts have made a habit of finding rookie free agents and other team’s discarded players that fit with this team and go on to success. Willie Parker and James Harrison are always at the top of the lists of the success stories that everyone mentions.

But what about the Nate Washingtons, the Darnell Stapletons, the Patrick Baileys, the Gary Russells and others?

Here are the future names that will play a big part in the Steelers success beginning next year that will once again show you why teams should pour more money into their scouting departments instead of coaches and over-rated want-to-be ballers: Jason Capizzi, Donovan Woods, Stefan Logan, Ryan Mundy (I know the team drafted him and he was cut while injured, but they did bring him back), and Roy Lewis.

Now, on to Free Agency. The Steelers did a smart thing by immediately opening up talks with Deebo. That sends good vibes to Deebo, the rest of the team and also the whole organization. The message is if you have produced and still can produce at a high-level in the future, you’ll be taken care of.

So, with Deebo out of the way, let’s turn to players that the Steelers have to keep this offseason — Bryant McFadden and Max Starks. Are either of them Pro Bowl players? No, not yet (BMac can be). Can you win Super Bowls with either of them? The answer is two “Sticky-Icky” Lombardi trophies at the team’s headquarters right now. It’s not so much if a team can win without a player. That’s not the point. The point is can you win “WITH THEM.” By resigning Starks and B. McFadden, you have no more questions for the next 4 to 5 years about RCB and LOT. They can do the job and still have upside. Sign them and you don’t have to worry about blowing a lot of loot in free agency trying to fill those positions with players who might not be as good or might not buy into the Steelers way of doing things, which is very important to team success. In other words, a key in Pro Football is not making a strength a weakness. Both are good young players at their positions who have performed and have a lot of room for growth. Pay them and let’s not make a strength a weakness.

Keyaron Fox is also one of the signings that the Steelers usually make under the radar for 3 to 4 years who end up showing the ownership’s foresight. Fox could someday be paired with Timmons in the middle for this defense and the Steelers know this. Add on the fact that he is great on special teams and the Steelers will get it done. On the other hand, Nate Washington is the type of deal where the team usually doesn’t get sucked into. Nate is a free agent player that they discovered who does one thing well — get deep. He does not make tough catches in traffic, he’s not going to block, he’s not someone that you can depend on to step up to be either your no. 1 or no. 2 WR. So, in those cases, you offer him a contract for what you think he is worth to this team. That contract is as a third WR. Don’t forget, you have to pay Santonio and Heath in the next 2 years, so why overpay for a third WR? The answer is you don’t.

Trai Essex would be a good lineman to have in a pinch, but if you don’t think he is a starter, he doesn’t get starter money. However, I do think Essex is a better guard than Chris K., who will land a pretty decent deal elsewhere. See ya Chris K. and thanks for the 4th rcound compensatory pick that you’ll bring in 2010.

And DaTruth believes Colbert will bring back Marvel Smith as soon as his back checks out late this summer. It will probably be a two-year deal tied to how many games Marvel actually plays. In other words, low base salary with a lot of incentives based on playing time. Believe me, no one is beating down the door for a 30-year-old LT with back problems who has ended the past 2 years on IR. However, this could be one of those bargain signings that could help the team next year if everything checks out. Blitz, I haven’t forgot about you. Let’s talk draft big uglies.

Here are the top 10 tackles on the board for the 2009 draft:

Star-divide

1. Eugene Monroe, Virginia (6-5, 315)
2. Andre Smith, Alabama (6-4, 340)
3. Jason Smith, Baylor (6-5, 300)
4. Michael Oher, Mississippi (6-5, 320)
5. Eben Britton, Arizona (6-6, 310)
6. William Beatty, Connecticut (6-6, 310)
7. Jamon Meredith, South Carolina (6-5, 289)
8. Fenuki Tupou, Oregon (6-5, 332)
9. Phil Loadholt, Oklahoma (6-6, 316)
10. Augustus Parrish, Kent State (6-5, 300)

 The first 4 will likely be gone by the time the Steelers draft, but there are 4 that I believe the Steelers will be looking very closely at and another that people will mention as a possible Steeler but I don’ t think they’ll go that way:

- Eben Britton, Arizona – DaTruth hasn’t watched any tape on this guy. Don’t know much about him except for what I have read. The fact that he can play both sides and is only 21 years old kind of falls into the pattern of the Steeler’s drafts the past few years — get a talented junior who fits the Steelers mold and sign him to a 5-year contract. Even if you have to give him a redshirt year the 1st year, ala Timmons, Mendenhall, Holmes, Palomula, he can be ready to start the 2nd year.

- Phil Loadholt, Oklahoma – Yeah, yea, the Datruth saw him give up the corner a few times in the Senior Bowl that resulted in sacks. But Datruth also saw him play a pretty mean game at LT in the championship game against Florida. He played much better than the more hyped teammate G Duke Robinson. The guy is 6’8, 345, and could come in and start at RT for this team from day one. That way, you can move Willie Colon to left guard or right guard, his more natural position. This guy could help the team’s run game right away and continue to work on his pass protection. Another good thing for the Steelers and Loadholt is that he’d never face a better pass rusher throughout the season than what he would see in practice every day going up against Woodley and Deebo. Think they might show this kid some tough love to get him ready? Loadholt could be a 2nd-round pick, but I don’t know if he would be around when the Steelers pick again at the end of the 2nd round. If the Steelers want him, they should take him, even at no. 32.

- Fenuki Tupou, Oregon (6-5, 332) – Do you know who was playing left tackle when Dennis Dixon and that offense was breaking all of those records? This guy. In fact, the coaching staff moved Max Unger to center from LT when he came aboard and he played well on the blindside for a team that put up a lot of points the past few years. He has the size and toughness to play on the right side right away. In case you didn’t know, Datruth like players that played LT at a high-level in college. A good LT in college can usually translate to a pretty good RT in the pros with some work. Again, this team needs to get its running game going again, so he has the size to help with that right off the bat.

- Jamon Meredith, South Carolina – He’s actually a little over 300 pounds, but he fits the mold as someone that the Steelers would take in the 3rd or 4th round and give a few years to get stronger and polish his technique before sticking him on the edge. Anyone who can play LT in the SEC at a high level has a chance to do some things at the next level in the NFL, whether at RT or Guard.

- William Beatty, Connecticut – Mike Mayock really likes the guy and believes he could be a starting LT in 2 years and about another 20 pounds. DaTruth doesn’t know that much about him, but he did notice that he had trouble anchoring against bullrushes in the Senior Bowl. Putting him out there next year to go against Deebo would be the equivalent of child abuse. He also could be someone that the Steelers would draft in the second or third round, and give them a couple of years, but I think Loadholt and Tupuo would be more ready from Day One.

Gerald Cadogan of Penn State and Jason Watkins of Florida are two other names to keep in mind.

OFFENSIVE GUARDS

1. Duke Robinson, Oklahoma (6-5, 335)
2. Herman Johnson, LSU (6-7, 335)
3. Tyronne Green, Auburn (6-2, 309)
4. Andy Levitre, Oregon State (6-2, 318)
5. Trevor Canfield, Cincinnati (6-5, 305)
6. Seth Olsen, Iowa (6-5, 304)
7. T.J. Lang, Eastern Michigan (6-4, 312)
8. Kraig Urbik, Wisconsin (6-6, 323)
9. Cornelius Lewis, Tennessee State (6-4, 324)
10. Jaimie Thomas, Maryland (6-4, 331)

 - Robinson and Urbik are two players that fit the Steelers mold for guards, but not in the first two rounds. Robinson would be a good pick-up in the third round while Urbik could be had on the 2nd day.

CENTERS

1. Alex Mack, California (6-4, 314)
2. Max Unger, Oregon (6-5, 305)
3. Eric Wood, Louisville (6-5, 308)
4. Antoine Caldwell, Alabama (6-5, 305)
5. Jonathan Luigs, Arkansas (6-5, 314)
6. Cecil Newton, Tennessee State (6-2, 295)
7. A.Q. Shipley, Penn State (6-1, 297)
8. Alex Fletcher, Stanford (6-3, 302)
9. Brett Helms, LSU (6-2, 282)
10. Jon Cooper, Oklahoma (6-2, 292)

- Alex Mack, California (6-4, 314) – DaTruth does kinda agree with Jim Wexell in that this guy looks like the Steelers pick at no. 32. He could play some guard for them next year and take over for Justin Hartwig when his contract expires after this year. Mack has the ability to sink his hips and anchor, which will be critical going up against the Sean Rogers and Haoliti Ngatas of the world that he’ll see twice a year in the AFC North. Also, for a first round pick, you want someone who can come in and fill a very important role without a lot of bust potential with All-Pro capability down the road. He probably does that for this team better than any of the above mentioned thus far.

- Max Unger – Looked more like a finesse OL to me in the senior bowl than what this team would want inside. He played LT earlier in his career, but it didn’t look like he could play that at the next level. Then again, DaTruth isn’t a scout. I just know important people like Blitz.

- Eric Wood – If Mack isn’t a Steeler, then this guy probably will be. He will not win any beauty contests and won’t set the world on fire as far as one-o- one drills. But put him in a game, and he’ll punch someone in the mouth. Mike Mayock loves him. DaTruth does too. He can probably play some guard as well. In case you guys didn’t notice, Tomlin is a lot bigger on “position flexibility” than his predecessor. And that played an important part in the Steelers getting that sixth trophy this year.

3-4 DEFENSIVE ENDS

1. Jarron Gilbert, San Jose State (6-5, 287)
2. Tyson Jackson, LSU (6-4, 295)
3. Everette Pedescleaux, Northern Iowa (6-6, 305)
4. Ra’Shon Harris, Oregon (6-4, 300)
5. Kyle Moore, USC (6-5, 273)
6. Zach Potter, Nebraska (6-7, 277)
7. Pannel Egboh, Stanford (6-6, 272)
8. Khalif Mitchell, East Carolina (6-5, 317)
9. Jeremy Navarre, Maryland (6-3, 285)
10. Bobby Greenwood, Alabama (6-5, 280)
 
- DaTruth believes the Steelers will pick 2 DL (2nd RD pick, 3rd RD pick) on the first day of the draft. Of this group, Jarron Gilbert (who will be around in the 2nd round when the Steelers pick) and Zach Potter are names to keep an eye on. Again, DaTruth hasn’t seen a lot of them play, but they fit the body types and have characteristics that the team wants in their 3-4 DL. In fact, DaTruth would bank on the Steelers grabbing nothing but lineman with its first four picks on draft day — 2 OL & 2 DT/DE.

4-3 DEFENSIVE ENDS

1. Brian Orakpo, Texas (6-4, 260)
2. Robert Ayers, Tennessee (6-3, 273)
3. Michael Johnson, Georgia Tech (6-7, 260)
4. Paul Kruger, Utah (6-5, 265)
5. Connor Barwin, Cincinnati (6-4, 255)
6. David Veikune, Hawaii (6-2, 255)
7. Phillip Hunt, Houston (6-1, 261)
8. Michael Bennett, Texas A&M (6-4, 271)
9. Brandon Williams, Texas Tech (6-5, 252)
10. Lawrence Sidbury Jr., Richmond (6-3, 267)

- This was just given to list some of the players that the team could be considering for an OLB. In the Steelers D, it’s rush linebackers are converted DE’s, so this is just to give you an idea on some names the Steelers will be looking at. And by the way, don’t forget about LB Bruce Davis that the Steelers took this past year in the 3rd round. Do you think an offseason working out with Deebo and Woodley will help his game next year? Patrick Bailey, Donovan Woods, and possibly Mike Humpall (if he is still with the team) all should be strong possibilities for spots next year.

NOSE TACKLES

1. B.J. Raji, Boston College (6-1, 325)
2. Ron Brace, Boston College (6-3, 326)
3. Fili Moala, USC (6-5, 305)
4. Dorell Scott, Clemson (6-3, 310)
5. Terrance Taylor, Michigan (6-1, 314)
6. Sammie Lee Hill, Stillman (6-4, 331)
7. Terrance Knighton, Temple (6-3, 324)
8. Myron Pryor, Kentucky (6-0 310)
9. Marlon Favorite, LSU (6-1, 308)
10. Louis Ellis, Shaw (6-2, 315)

 - Hate to say it, but time to pick Big Snack’s successor and get him in the fold. Let John Mitchell beat up on him a bit, teach him how to 2-gap Steelers style and get him ready to play in two years. Don’t know a lot about these players, but there is definitely more size to consider in this group than in the previous year. Maybe that was the reason why K. Colbert went with skill players on the first day because there wasn’t as much size in this past draft at NT and DT as there is this year. Anyone seen any of these hogs play?

Blitz & Sixburgh, you got a taste. DaTruth can’t give you the whole pkg. Think of this TRUTH from DaTruth like a laxative. You only need a little bit to get everything else flowing. Let the comments flow! Hit me up, B! To Sixburgh, Be Blessed.

Comment 58 comments  |  3 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

I think

we have to go with a big RT with our first pick. Sign Starks because he did a pretty good job last year and is still pretty young, and keep him at LT. No doubt our scouts are breaking down footage on all of these lineman possibilities on both sides of the ball, so hopefully we get a few steals in the later rounds.

by SteelerDomination on Feb 14, 2009 7:13 PM EST reply actions  

If we draft a tackle in the first he needs to be able to play LT. Right tackle just isn’t as important as LT and drafting someone in the first just to replace Colon is a major mistake.

by archon095 on Feb 14, 2009 8:12 PM EST up reply actions  

datruth

awesome job as always man

by schnifin on Feb 14, 2009 7:21 PM EST reply actions  

I’ve seen Brace play,..he’s big. Also,…I really think we should get a fullback. I’m tired of this TE thing Arians has going. One guy I love is Fui Vakapuna. I think he’d make a monster full back that could run (ala Leron McClain) in goal line. He’s got that Samoan/Tongan strength.

by ismail on Feb 14, 2009 8:01 PM EST reply actions  

Looking for luck

Phil Loadholt is listed as 6-6,316 on your list and 6-8,345 in your text..??

I agree RT is the most important need on the OL, at LT we at least have options Starks -being the least likely-plus Hills and Smith. Topou is especailly intriguing.

At Guard I really like Tyrone Green(footwork) but the way we play I worry he’d wear
down over the season. Mack,Urbik and Lewis also look good.

The NT’s look like a deep bunch hopefully one falls to us so we don’t reach.

Personally I think RT & NT are must drafts so I hope we get lucky there.

by Marvin, The Paranoid Android on Feb 14, 2009 8:45 PM EST reply actions  

Great stuff truth

Love your analysis of the roster especially the potential impact of practice roster guys. I have one question for you about potential draft picks. You have USC DE Fili Moala as a NT candidate, but I’ve seen scouting reports that say he could be a good fit as a 3-4 DE. I know he has been a bit of an underachiever at USC but his size and decent quickness puts him in the picture at DE in our system. He is such a strong dude, maybe that’s why NT is a projection. What say your sources? A reach for first round, but not around at the end of the second round? Also, loved your top ranking of DE Jarron Gilbert. He has been favorably compared to DE Kendall Langford, who had a great rookie season with the Dolphins and was on the wish list for many of us here at BTSC last year.

by steeler.lifer on Feb 14, 2009 8:56 PM EST reply actions  

Marvel Smith

I personally agree, I think we can retain smith cheaply. There are plenty of better OT’s to be had.

That having been said, I would like to keep smith in a backup roll. Lets get somebody new in there.

Smith can tutor/mentor the young guy, and if one of our OT’s goes down Smith can be solid for 6-8 games. We know Smith is basically only good for 1/2 a season, so spare him the first half and let him fill in if someone goes down.

by Mechem on Feb 14, 2009 10:41 PM EST reply actions  

Essex

isn’t a better guard than Kemo. He isn’t a guard at all as a matter of fact, he is a left tackle. He filled in quite admirably for Bill Cowher as a replacement for Marvel Smith in a tough away game in Baltimore. He can be resigned cheaply as a backup left tackle.

by Dr Del on Feb 14, 2009 11:14 PM EST reply actions  

Always a treat to learn from DaTruth

Question: If Britton and Mack are both available, who should we take?

Thoughtful discussion with a sense of history

by maryrose on Feb 14, 2009 11:50 PM EST reply actions  

Mack

All the draft reports that I’ve read consider Mack to be the hands down best center in the draft who could contribute immediately. In fact, one site has him listed as the best center to come out of the draft in the last five years. Although Britton is solid, he is not listed as a tier one left tackle. He may even be available in round two.

by Dr Del on Feb 15, 2009 12:32 AM EST reply actions  

I like Mack for a number of reasons

-Seems to have a strong leadership quality. Something sorely lacking in this line since we lost Faneca. Right now that job falls on Max Starks and it’s not his strong suit.
-Physical freak. Sweet Technique. He has the power to bowl them over or dance them aside. I’ve watched a lot of highlights and the guy is a beast.
-Aids us against a division strong suit; Big 3-4 NTs. We’ve been brutalized up the interior for a few seasons now. This season was better than last, but we’re still watching Ngata get huge push up the middle double-teamed while LBs rush Ben freely.
-Mack will probably be the best player available at 32. He is most likely the best center in more than a couple drafts. We desperately need a franchise player we can solidly build our line around.

by BallsofSteel on Feb 15, 2009 3:08 AM EST reply actions   1 recs

I agree, take Mack

If he can step into a starting role at guard or center right away and help neutralize guys like Ngata and Rogers, that would have a huge impact on the O-line. He seems like he will be the best player available and the safest pick. We need immediate help on the line, so take the sure thing, not a guy who is more of a project and will take time to develop.

One other thought—I’ve read a lot of discussion about whether or not we trade up in the first round. Assuming that none of the top four tackles slip into the 20s, I think the answer is no, but what about trading up in the second round to make sure they get one of the second-tier tackles or a defensive lineman? It would cost much less to move up in round two, and we certainly have the extra picks this year to be able to make a move. Seems like it could be a good strategy…what do you guys think?

by nycsteeler on Feb 15, 2009 7:43 AM EST reply actions  

D-T

Datruth,

Good stuff my man, Heckler’s Sports thoroughly enjoyed the breakdown and analysis. Doesn’t matter that the Steelers are looking at the Big Ugglies this year in the 1st couple rounds, I’m all juiced up for the DRAFT—I guess that “Sticky Icky” will do that to you. No Super Bowl Hangover for the fans—
Halellujah-Holla Back

by Heckler's Sports on Feb 15, 2009 9:31 AM EST reply actions  

i have a question for truth and all yall

Is it really time to invest heavily in Aaron Smith and Big SNack’s replacements? Has Aaron Smtih ever missed a game except when his bicep got torn in 2007? Answer: no. He didnt slow down one lick this past year either.

I’d say the same for Snack really. Outside of him coming into camp out of shape – which I don’t think will happen again. Dealt with some injuries; but he’s still impossible to move up there. With Farrior, Timmons, Aa Smith, Woodley, Polamalu, J Harrison – why invest in a replacement for Snack right now? He’s got a few years left!

Plus, guys like Snack dont grow on trees. You have to go get them high in Round 1 like we did with him. I’m just fine with him and Hoke for two more years and adressing O Line and a DE position.

Thoughts?

by Michael Bean on Feb 15, 2009 10:25 AM EST reply actions  

id just assume

Get another 2nd or 3rd round LB to roll into Farrior’s job in a few years than reach for someone to anchor our rush defense when Snack cant play. And I’d just assume invest big on a elite 1st round DT when the times right rather than taking a late 2nd or 3rd round guy hoping he can anchor the leagues best rush defense for the past decade.

by Michael Bean on Feb 15, 2009 10:27 AM EST up reply actions  

Dont' we have...

… enough LBs on the roster?

I’m behind you when it comes to finding a new DT, though. The guys we’ve got are solid. When it’s time to bolster that position, we’ll want an elite player.

by Varmint on Feb 15, 2009 12:06 PM EST up reply actions  

Yeah We have enough talent in LB´s right now, Timmons could be 1º LB in almost everywhere, Fox, Davis,

even play very effectively when called

O sales tickets,...and let D rest a little, and D Win Championships.

by YeOldeMexFan on Feb 19, 2009 5:13 AM EST up reply actions  

For A. Smith I say yeah. He is very healthy and has a high motor, but Smith’s position will be an area of need. If we draft now we can take the time to develop him and he can get snaps to spell the aging veterans much like they get spelled now from time to time. It’s a great time to draft his potential replacement and there are some nice DEs around in the draft that will be around at times we can draft them. Draft a DE with the potential to play LDE for A. Smith down the road.

For casey I say yeah. He has noticeably slowed and does not always command a double team like he did in the past. With his weight it’s unclear how long he’ll last going forward and his backup is not a spring chicken. The steelers like easing rookie’s in, so now would be a good time. I can’t see Big snack’s replacement coming along this year though. I am not sold on either of the top two NTs, and even if I was the likelihood that we can draft one of them is minimal. This is a position we’ll need to keep our eye out on, but I think a dominating 2-gap NT is not on the table this year. Long live big snack.

Don't worry about the haters. Haters only hate.

by steelguy99 on Feb 15, 2009 12:05 PM EST up reply actions  

Sounds like

you’re saying that we would really need to wait until after an 8-8 or worse season to get his replacement. I’d agree with extending Hampton now to get some relief on his cap hit. He is pretty important to help stop the run, but on the other hand, as we saw last year (2007, I mean), it looks like Aaron Smith is even more critical to our run D than Hampton. This seems even more true considering how well we did this year with Hampton and Keisel hurt. Hoke, Eason, and Kirschke seemed to do a pretty good job in those weeks 2-5 when needed. I may have the weeks wrong, but I think that was the general timeframe.

by WolfpackSteelersFan on Feb 15, 2009 11:40 PM EST up reply actions  

Snack dont grow on trees, he grows on Krispy Kremes

But in all seriousness you NEED to get at least one guy in there NOW.

Look at what happened with Big Red. We thought we’d have him for a while, no need to stock up behind a good veteran.

And things deteriorated and we were caught with our weiners in the fridge. We had nobody legit to put into LG. And thats because we didnt really plan.

Ponderosa Hampton is gonna be running out of glucose in a couple years and we will need to have a viable swap

by Mechem on Feb 17, 2009 12:41 AM EST up reply actions  

Snack time

 With Hampton’s conditioning practices over the years he’s gonna hit a wall and deteriorate pretty quickly, it’s not a sure thing but it’s very likely. His contract up in 2010 it’s best to acquire good options now rather than..

As for Aaron, he’s a different isn’t he? Best and most productive on the DL, he’s gonna be around for a couple more years.

LB’s are in good supply at the moment, so unless someone utterly unbelievable falls into our lap, I don’t see it.

by Marvin, The Paranoid Android on Feb 15, 2009 5:02 PM EST reply actions  

Deebo

Probably showing ignorance here,but who is “Deebo”…?

by rissaldar on Feb 15, 2009 5:55 PM EST reply actions  

james harrison

deebo is the guy in the movie Friday who steals everybody’s stuff. The bully on the block that everyone’s afraid of.

by Michael Bean on Feb 15, 2009 10:11 PM EST up reply actions  

DPOY

Defensive player of the year: James Harrison
Photo on front page..in casual wear and a good mood.

by Marvin, The Paranoid Android on Feb 15, 2009 6:22 PM EST reply actions  

Tony Hills

Are we going to see him starting this year? Another Ignorant question. Sorry. Haven’t checked back in a while.

by SoCalSteelerFan on Feb 15, 2009 6:53 PM EST reply actions  

No one knows, but Blitz has a good article up regarding it:

http://www.behindthesteelcurtain.com/2009/2/11/755861/the-unknown-variable-in-th

Don't worry about the haters. Haters only hate.

by steelguy99 on Feb 15, 2009 10:16 PM EST up reply actions  

WR and DT

Two things:

If Nate Washington does leave, Sweed steps in as the number 3 receiver. Who do we add/draft to fill the # 4 and # 5 spots. I know we have Baker, but I’m not sure if he’s the answer. Also, with BA’s philosophy, I don’t feel comfortable with just 4 wide outs.

Hold on to Big Snack for at least another year. If I were to pick one guy who the Steelers have a shot at drafting in 2010 as a first rounder, it would be Terrence Cody (dreamers will say Taylor Mays-Damn would that be nice), the enormous defensive tackle out of Alabama (6’ 5’’, somewhere between 360-380 pounds).

To the tune of the classic children's song "This Old Man" (the part with nick nack patty whack)

Big Snack, Silverback, take the Dawg Pound's Bone, the Black and Gold sent the Brownies crying home.

by Tim Mullhaupt (HSS) on Feb 15, 2009 10:25 PM EST reply actions  

Dallas Baker is better than you might think

He was just the extra cook in the kitchen who had to get out, but notice how we grabbed him back in a hurry. I’m sure they told him to stay in shape and stay healthy, knowing the current Nate situation. The Steelers are counting on Limas being the new Nate and Baker being the new Limas. I’m OK with that. I’m guessing they are going to let Nate walk for an inflated paycheck, being a Super Bowl champion. Much the same as Randle-El three years ago. I don’t think Randle-El has made us regret our decision. Resource management is the name of the game. Having Baker’s salary on the books instead of Nate’s is going to leave us more money to do smarter things.

Of course, if we re-sign Nate then I have just made a fool of myself.

Thoughtful discussion with a sense of history

by maryrose on Feb 15, 2009 11:19 PM EST up reply actions  

Probably right though

It would seem to follow our habit of letting most WRs walk in FA. Even guys like Thigpen, who, at the time, was the best WR on the roster.

by WolfpackSteelersFan on Feb 15, 2009 11:44 PM EST up reply actions  

i liked yancy

at least my nostalgia’s making me think highly of him.

by Michael Bean on Feb 16, 2009 12:23 AM EST up reply actions  

Me too

I was really sad to see him go, and to a division rival, no less!

by WolfpackSteelersFan on Feb 16, 2009 12:29 AM EST up reply actions  

I think you have it pegged on Nate

As much as I’d like to see Nate stay I just don’t see it happening. This is a lean year for FA wide receivers and Nate will attract a lot of interest because of his speed, age and consistent improvement in route running (a lot) and catching ability (a little). He didn’t do much in the post-season but everyone saw him beat DRC by five yards on that pass Ben underthrew in the Super Bowl. Someone will offer him more money and more passes his way than the Steelers can (or need to do).

HS Steeler makes a good point though about the the lack of depth at WR should Washington leave. Do you really want to go into a season with your No. 3 and No. 4 WRs having a combined total of seven career catches? We run a lot of 4 WR sets and Hines’ durability will continue to be factor. We lose him for a few games, and it’s Santonio and three guys with a number on their backs. To me, Sweed and Baker are just guys with a jersey number until they do something. When we lost Burress we brought in Cedric Wilson and Quincy Morgan to fill out the back end of the WR roster and I think we would have to sign a cheap veteran FA, or a veteran who gets cut in August, this time too.

by steeler.lifer on Feb 16, 2009 1:00 AM EST up reply actions  

True about the 4-WR sets, and I guess it is too much to ask for Arians to adjust his gameplan to fit the personnel?

Don't worry about the haters. Haters only hate.

by steelguy99 on Feb 16, 2009 9:35 AM EST up reply actions  

Randle L

My only beef with Randle was that we lost our PR KR and look how screwed up 06 was in that regard. Honestly. I mean we had issues there. We lost at least 1-2 games on ST fumblerooskis.

by Mechem on Feb 17, 2009 12:43 AM EST up reply actions  

"fumblerooskis"

I come to this site just for the vocabulary lessons.

by Varmint on Feb 17, 2009 5:19 PM EST up reply actions  

I think you're being generous...

I think we lost like 5 that way, at least that’s how it seemed.

It was so bad that year and into the next that I began to have to close my eyes when we were getting punted or kicked to.

I’ll take possesion of the ball and no gain over that again any day.

I thought we lost a lot in El in that we became a lot more predictable and as you said – have not been to the return game table much since. Tone and Russell have been the best IMO that we’ve had since El left.

by SCSteeler on Feb 17, 2009 6:49 PM EST up reply actions  

draft

 I agree with alot of what yhou said but I don’tsee the Steelers using 2 of the first 4 picks on DL. M

by y4Adollar on Feb 16, 2009 9:10 AM EST reply actions  

Good stuff...

Thanks to Datruth…keep it rolling.

A note on Meredith at OT: I admit that I spent most of the games this year screaming from the stands…so didn’t break much footage down, but the o-line was not a strength for the Gamecocks this year. There was basically no run game all year, and there were issues with pass protection as well. I suppose that he could have been the good guy on an otherwise kinda stinky line, but I would say procede with caution on that one. (Line coach was fired after the season).

I agree that they should prob look to keep Starks – he has shown and proven his worth and versatility. I don’t hate the guy, but would really love to see someone else at right tackle next year than Colon. Getting beat every so often not the end of the world, but what stands out to me where the mental mistakes that led to so many penalties. I’d never seen so many flags for not lining up correctly before…not to mention the false starts.

I do think it would be a good idea to draft some later round prospects on the DL, but not necessarily as the future replacements for Snack and Smith. Perhaps as future Hokes and Kirschkes rather. I tend to agree that we should wait till the right time to get those replacements.

by SCSteeler on Feb 16, 2009 11:05 AM EST reply actions  

Mack

I think the upside for taking a center named “Mack” has got to be the nickname possibilities. Our nose tackle would be “Big Snack” and our center would be “Big Mack”.
Some other possibilities: “Mack Daddy”, “Holy Mack”, “The Bulldog”, “Mack Truck”, and “Mack Attack” (Lots of McDonalds references there, which I assume he’s visited. Maybe he could wear the golden arches on one sleve).

by WyoFan on Feb 16, 2009 11:12 AM EST reply actions  

Jeff Reed would follow him around like a puppy and use his Macking skills.

Don't worry about the haters. Haters only hate.

by steelguy99 on Feb 16, 2009 11:31 AM EST up reply actions  

Mack Machine?

Mack Machine cause he’s money?

Meat macking fudge packin BK stackin?

by Mechem on Feb 17, 2009 12:44 AM EST up reply actions  

This is harder then speculating in the stock market!

I believe our first 2 picks MUST be ready to be a starter in 09 if necessary!
So, no DL in the first 2 rounds for christ sake!
What we need in round one is a ready to go OT or a new franchise Center like Alex Mack.
If Marvel Smith sticks around and in playable condiions, we might sign Starks and wont even bother about a OT in first round or even 2nd, assuming Starks is willing to get back to RT for a while of course.
That means a Center like Alex Mack would be the perfect 1st pick. Unfortunently I doubt that with so much hype he will still be available when our time comes…( I also doubt the Steelers staff is thaaat worried putting a new starting C in 09, I think Hartwig was ok enough so, nobody will be really worried about substituting him in 09, so maybe the best option is to get a C in second or third round to be a starter only in 2010.
For the 3rd n 4th round , we should be looking for one future probowl DE , thats for sure, much more crucial than a NT for the next 2 years, is to have a massive, killer DE to fill either left or right DE postion.
I say we worry about a new Big Snack next year or something..
Now comes the spice! If I was Colbert, I would go for a hot WR/KR somewhere around 3-5 rounds. I agree there is no purpose re-signing Nate Washington and I guess Limas Sweed would improve better if we get a new hot wide to push him bit in camp. Also we desperately need a new KR so that would make a lot of sense! I also dont trust Dallas Baker at all by the way . .
I also would love to se a new talented FB being drafted. Carey Davis is simply awfull I have to say and even if McHugh is doing a solid work, he is to big and not experienced in running at all to be a traditional FB. And simply avoiding in 09 having a traditional FB like in 08 is really really stupid. We need a sick new blocker who can also run n catch!
My dream draft would start with a trade up because I honestly dont think we need so many late round picks this year to begin with, I would prefer to have 2 early rounders that can start right away and maybe just one more ordinary pick than 10 late rounders this year.
The chemistry in our franchise couldnt be better and Im pretty sure we would not have any problems trying to keep as many of the not so good players that already have a ring or two as possible and still trying to develop them. Im also sure many many Patrick Bailey/Darnell Stapleton kind of guys can be found by our great scouts and anybody in the NFL wouldnt mind being part of our franchise. So yeah I would try a sick trade to get around 15 at least in the first 2 rounds.

With that happening or not, my ideal offseason moves n draft would be something like this:

Free agency:

Resign Marvel if he can really play and keep him in LT, resign Essex and only resign Starks if the price is right compared to other possibilites for RT in free agency and 1st draft day.

In the Draft:
 
1.Highest ranked OLine player available
2.2nd highest ranked Oliner available
3.Highest ranked 3-4 DE available
4.One hot WR/KR
5.A new blasting and versatile FB
6.Another DL guy maybe?
7.whatever. . .

The WR/KR is crucial in my dream draft, assuming Nate is gone so I would be willing to take him even earlier if necessaryl That also goes for the FB!

by setherian on Feb 16, 2009 3:04 PM EST reply actions  

Someone addressed this at some point

but IIRC, for us to trade up to 15 would require us to basically trade our entire draft (or next year’s first rounder). I just don’t see that happening.

by WolfpackSteelersFan on Feb 16, 2009 3:55 PM EST up reply actions  

A 1 and a 2 and a 3...

We could get up to 15 or so by trading our first, second, and third-round choices. That would leave us with no second-round pick, but we would still have our third-round compensatory pick and all of our other picks (rounds 4-7).

by Steelin on Feb 16, 2009 4:15 PM EST up reply actions  

Way too expensive...

 if the guy’s just good or even very good then what? you’d have one very good player for the price of three very good players.

You trade up for 1) a sure thing (which doesn’t actually exist(ask Mike Ditka)) or 2) Teams ahead drafting for need and not the best talent on the board and I don’t expect that to happen 14 times.

but I could be wrong.

by Marvin, The Paranoid Android on Feb 16, 2009 8:37 PM EST up reply actions  

DaTruth follow-up to questions

Great responses to the post. All have made great points and a lot of what you are saying could come true. Here are some quick thoughts on my follow up to your thoughts:

- Phil Loadholt is 6’8, 345 lbs (not the 6’6, 315 I posted in one of the other posts, Sorry for the error). I’d like to watch tape of Loadhold because I think he’s going to be a better pro than college player. You have to admit it, to be that big and play LT for one of the premiere division 1 teams in the nation says a lot about his ability. I didn’t see him get outquicked against a Florida team in the championship game that usually make Ohio State’s unathletic tackles look like a turnstile. I believe Loadholt could start for the Steelers from Day One (particularly if the Steelers resign Starks and moves him to LT and move Colon inside to guard). Loadholt can develop his kick-step and even if hw needs help his first year, give him a running back to chip on his side. I see a lot of improvement in his game just by going up against Woodley and Deebo everyday in practice. The big positive is that he can maul in the running game from day one. Big Ben can’t end up on his back if he’s just handing the ball off most of the time. A lot of what is being said about Loadholt right now is what was said about the Chargers Marcus McNeil three years ago (too big, can’t move his feet, purely a right tackle, etc.) Those of you who watch football know that McNeil has played in 2 pro bowls at LT for one of the highest scoring offenses in the league. Also like McNeil, Loadhold might turn out to be a second round steal.

- With that said, a team cannot miss on its first round pick or it will have dire consequences on the team down the road. Alex Mack might be the Steelers safest choice at no. 32 and a need pick for them as well. Tomlin knows this line has to be rebuilt, and Mack and Starks would be a good start. Call me crazy, but if the Steelers went Mack at no. 32 and then Loadholt or Tupuo at no. 64, I think they would be well on their way to having a great first day. By the way, I still think this team will come out with 2 OL, 2 DL on day one.

- One good thing is that Dale Lolley mentioned on his most recent blog that he thinks the Steelers are going to try to lock up Starks with a long-term deal. He also said that he expects the Steelers to offer M. Smith a veteran minimum type deal with a lot of incentives tied to his getting paid by how many games he starts and plays in. M. Smith said in a Sirius interview to Pat Kirwan that he wants to retire a Steeler. But if you are K. Colbert, how in the world can you trust that back? The good thing is the team will have until August to make a decision because no one is going to throw big money at Smith early in free agency.

- There are some on here who have mentioned that it is too early to get the successors for A. Smith, Big Snack and B. Keisel on the roster right now. I disagree. Any young DL coming onto this team will need at the mininum a year just to learn the Steelers D and the way that John Mitchell teaches his lineman how to two-gap. Also, this gives the lineman a chance to grow into their position and increase their strength. The best time to draft for a particular postion is when that position already have starters in place. Bring in the young guys and lot the starters teach them what it means to play championship-caliber ball as DL for the Steelers. With 9 draft picks, the team will come out of this draft with 2 DE’s and 1 nose tackle. The great thing is that with our scouting department, the players that our scouts find in free agency could be better than whatever we nab in the draft.

- The only player I think the Steelers would trade up for is Michael Oher. And the highest that I think they would move up to is probably to no. 25. That would require the team giving up a 3rd, 4th and maybe another pick (a 6th) along with its first to go that high. Since I believe Oher will be gone by that time, I rather stay where the Steelers are drafting and move up in the 2nd round if need be to get a player that they absolutely must have. With the depth in the OL, DL, and WR in this draft, this might be the perfect time for the Steelers to sit tight and let a lot of talent fall to them. However, this depends a lot on Colbert being able to resign Starks and McFadden. If not, you are drafting to try and fill specific holes instead of drafting the very best players.

- I expect the Steelers to draft a WR in the 4th or 5th round. Everytime I saw Iglesias from the Sooners play, I thought I was seeing a young Hines Ward (tough, talented, good hands, underutizied in team’s offense, can help on special teams, big chip on his shoulders). Don’t worry about this guy not running a 4.4. He’s just a good football player who will get better and better every year.

- Blitz, U R correct. I look forward to the draft more each year than I do to the playoffs or Super Bowl. There is just something about looking at this young talent, projecting how it would fit in with this organization, and then seeing our scouts just blow everyone out of the water time and time again. It’s amazing that teams haven’t come calling yet for Steelers College Scouting Coordinator Ron Hughes and Pro Scouting Coordinator Doug Whaley.

- The Steelers special teams could be better next year than this year with the return of a healthy punter D. Sepulvada, LS Greg Warren, a legitimate returner (Stefan Logan) and LB’s D. Woods, Patrick Bailey, Mike Humpall, and hopefully the return of Keyaron Fox. Ryan Mundy and Roy Lewis have excellent shots at making this team as backups at safety and cornerback.

- Are there any of U out there doubting that Tomlin will have this team hungry again next year? I think there is going to be more competition for starting spots than what people think. That is the only way to make a good team better — keep bringing in competition. This offseason could lay the groundwork for a future Steelers dynasty. With Tomlin, Colbert, the team’s scouting department, and the current talent on hand, I like this team’s chances. I do think Tomlin will get a new deal averaging about what the top 5 coaches in the league are receiving for about 3 additional years (making his new contract a 5-year-deal).

- Santonio’s catch not only gave this team a sixth championship, but it probably saved Bruce Arians’ job as well. If Tomlin still chooses to go in a different direction for OC, RB coach Kirby Wilson will take over the playcalling and Tomlin will probably go outside to bring in someone for Larry Zierlein.
 
- Thoughts?

by datruth4life on Feb 16, 2009 6:16 PM EST reply actions  

Follow-up to DaTruths followup

Regarding Marvel, it really won’t matter with the salary cap if the contract is incentive laden or not. We have to account for him maxing out. So giving him an incentive-laden contract still counts against the cap to the max. The Steelers might save a few bucks, but I think the team is more anxious to spend the cap the best way possible. I think what they will do is sign him straight and on the cheap with a hometown discount. His injuries the past two years will have other teams running away.

There’s no chance Arians get the axe. I know I am in the minority here, but for the team to succeed the way they did with one of the worst offensive lines in football speaks to Arians credit, not his detriment. Yes, it was the defense mainly, but Arians had one hand tied behind his back all season. How many times did we see FWP take a handoff and immediately two guys were ready to cream him. How many times did we have first and goal inside the five and not score because the defense was more in our backfield than our own guys? It is hard for an offensive coordinator to be effective when basic running plays are thrown out of the book in the first quarter. I would love to see Zierlein somewhere else. Defensive penetration, our biggest nemesis all season long, is not the fault of the OC. Either the line is inferior, the line coaching is inferior, or both.

I sure hope Stefan Logan is a good kick returner. There is something out of whack when the best we can up with for a kick returner is a stinking fullback.

One word about Ron Hughes and Doug Whaley…“shhhhh”….Let sleeping dogs lie!

From all I hear about Alex Mack, I am thinking he might be gone by 32….Now what? Loadholt or Britton? Loadholt will never be there 64. Could we trade down from 32 and get both of them somehow?

Thoughtful discussion with a sense of history

by maryrose on Feb 16, 2009 7:56 PM EST up reply actions  

Oher

I had been thinking that Oher was looked at as a top 10 OT, too, but I’m seeing some mock drafts that have him going in the 20’s. I saw Todd McShay and Mel Kiper’s mock draft today, and McShay had him going 23 and Kiper as low as 28. If he drops that far, I think we do trade up for him, then. I haven’t seen where Mayock has him going yet, though.

by WolfpackSteelersFan on Feb 16, 2009 8:08 PM EST up reply actions  

RE: Oher

Yeah I’ve seen those mocks too. If he is there at a point where we could get him without giving up our second or any picks next year I would jump. I seriously doubt those mocks are right about him though, my guess is we don’t get a sniff. I also think we don’t get Mack unless we trade up. If that happens it’d be nice to move back and get some combination of Gilbert + IOL (Wood?) but I doubt the FO will do that. I could see us going O-Skill or Secondary if that happens, or if someone like animal junior falls then we could even go that route.

by SteelerFan Ben on Feb 18, 2009 11:20 PM EST up reply actions  

Draft

I have to admit that I also enjoy the draft and the period leading up to it even more than I did the playoffs this year. Talking about the draft is nowhere near as thrilling as winning the SB, but the process (being much less stressful) of discussing the draft, and talking about potential players, going through the mock draft . . . . That was a lot of fun last year.

by WolfpackSteelersFan on Feb 16, 2009 8:14 PM EST up reply actions  

The only guy ....

 Kirby Wilson, I like him, Every time I see him on a NFL films clip he’s yelling something about whatever’s about to go wrong and he’s always right(if that makes any sense).

by Marvin, The Paranoid Android on Feb 16, 2009 8:46 PM EST up reply actions  

Draft thoughts for datruth

Truth thanks for the excellent update and responses. I’m on the same wavelength as you in just about all your comments . The draft is incredibly important and I think we have more long-term needs than many fans realize. OL and DL are fairly obvious but we also have to be focusing on ILBs and the secondary as well as WR depth. Even if McFadden stays (it’s maybe 50/50) we still have to inject young talent at safety; if McFadden leaves, then we need a CB fairly high in the draft. I’d be curious to know what you think about the possibility of CB/S Sean Smith or combo safety Louis Delmas being a “surprise” pick in the first round, especially if all six OTs and Mack are off the board. Is there a FA safety that is of interest to you? Remember last year the team looked at Cris Crocker and Eugene Wilson as potential FA acquisitions. Mundy might have some potential but overall, a year later, we need more help at safety than we did a year ago. Clark will be a FA next spring and both he and Troy get banged up the way they play.

As for DL, again I agree with you that the time is now to bring in and groom future replacements at DE and NT. The Steelers DEs in their 3-4 history have rarely been high draft picks. The run responsibilities (strength and lateral agility at the point of attack) and the ability to learn complex defensive schemes are more important than the flashy sack totals that highly-ranked DEs in the draft usually accumulate. That’s why I think it’s unlikely we would draft a DE in the first round. A guy like Purdue DE Alex Magee (6-4, 295) could be a very good addition in the third round. Your draft list includes two very interesting mid-round picks: DE Everette Pedescleaux (6-6, 305 and very athletic) and DL Sammie Lee Hill (6-4, 330) who actually played DE at a small school but projects as a NT. I saw a 10-minute clip of Pedescleaux and, while he played against lower competition and the clip obviously contains only highlights, his agility and quickness off the snap are incredible for a man of that size. Great frame and will obviously get stronger. Any combination of Magee, Pedescleaux and Hill among our four picks in rounds 3-5 could constitute great building blocks for the future. I think there are some FA D-lineman out there too that could contribute, perhaps a guy like C.J. Mosley of the Jets who is coming off his first contract and has played all three D-line positions.

You had some interesting speculation about potential coaching staff changes. We should hear fairly soon if anything is bubbling behind the scenes, though I agree with you that Arians has probably kept his job for another year. There is an old Tomlin quote that might apply to this situation. When he was coaching Tampa Bay’s secondary, one of his favorite Tomlinisms to his DB roster was: “I’ll tolerate you until I can replace you.” You have to wonder what his tolerance limit is for the offense, but obviously it’s pretty high. I agree with Maryrose in his analysis of the offense except for two points: The offensive line DID improve slightly in its pass blocking the second half of the season, and Zierlein deserves some credit for that. However the run blocking was inconsistent, often disastrous, from start to finish, with only a few blips of success along the way. I think it’s the OC’s job to call plays that take into account the strengths and weaknesses of the component parts. Only rarely (and usually with great success, including the first quarter of the Super Bowl) did he ever make Ben a moving target by design with bootlegs, counter roll-outs or what we used to call moving pockets. Just one of many problems.

by steeler.lifer on Feb 16, 2009 8:42 PM EST reply actions  

Great points by steeler.lifer

Steeler.lifer, you made some great points and you also have the Steelers thinking in free agency down pack.

- If the Steelers sign any free agents, it will either be their own or someone who is young coming off their first contract. They hit the jackpot this past year with Keyaron Fox, M. Moore and Justin Hartwig. Excellent value for what they paid. I wouldn’t be surprised if the Steelers transitioned Starks again if they can’t reach a deal with him before free agency kicks off. They still don’t have a starting LT on the roster right now and the transition figure for Starks wouldn’t be out of the realm for a starting LT coming off a Super Bowl. Here’s hoping that Colbert can lock up McFadden and Starks before free agency kicks off.

- For all that was right that Arians did this year, I still think it if up to the offensive coordinator to teach his offense how to better pick up the blitz and protect their QB. Either he needed to do a better job with that or the Steelers need better OL or a combination of them both. That game against the Eagles this past year where they ran the same blitz and sacked Ben six times in one quarter is something that I’ve never seen before in my 25 years of following professional football. And whose fault is it to continue to start Willie Colon at RT over Starks for two years? It might not be Arians, but I still scratch my head about that one.

- I don’t see how this line will be better if Kendall Simmons is starting next year. He has a tough hill to climb to come back from his achilles injury, particulary with his diabetic condition, and he carries a pretty high cap number for a below-average starter at guard in the NFL. Frankly, I think he is worse than D. Stapleton. The only game where Stapleton appeared overmatched was the Super Bowl against Darnell Dockett. That’s nothing to be ashamed of there. Dockett is an all-pro player with a motor. He also had two tough games against H. Ngata of the Ravens, but the Steelers haven’t been able to consistently block Ngata since he came in the league. I’d like to see Essex and Colon in the mix for starting guards next year along with C Alex Mack (if the Steelers draft him). All, am I wrong on Kendall Simmons?

- I think the Steelers are fine at safety. Behind Clark and Palomula, you have A. Smith, Ryan Mundy and Roy Lewis (who can also play corner). I’m not a big Tyrone Carter fan, but apparently Tomlin is. And William Gay can play safety, too. Resigning B. McFadden, other than working at an extension with Deebo, is the most important offseason resigning for this team. BMac has all-pro potential and you can’t let those type of young players go if you can help it. He’s perfect for LeBeau’s D.

- The team can grab a NT on the second day. There are plenty of big bodies to choose from. And we don’t know who will be the gem that the scouting department will unearth. We just know that it will be someone.

 - And in responding to Mary Rose, if it came down to Britton or Loadholt, why not go get both? Take Britton at no. 32 and then trade back up in the second and take Loadholt. I hope they wouldn’t look at doing that specifically because it would probably mean that Max Starks has signed somewhere else. Like I’ve always said, you don’t want to make a strength a weakness. The Steelers have a young LT with upside that has started on 2 Super Bowl teams. He’s not Anthony Munoz, but he IS someone you can win Super Bowls with. Get’R Done.

Thoughts?

by datruth4life on Feb 16, 2009 9:25 PM EST reply actions  

People,

Im not sure if the Steelers will go for an O-lineman in the first portions of the draft. I still think they will go with offensive skill position players or look into enhacing the drefense.

I reallly have no basis for this thinking. But I think Tomlin wants to really put some work into improving the offensive skilled players pool and keeping the defense young and thirsty.

Go Steelers!

by C-Mac on Feb 17, 2009 12:01 AM EST reply actions  

Lol

I like your acknowledging that you have no basis for this…

But in my opinion there is no real heavy demand at those offensive slots. QB is stacked, as is RB. WR is still solid and Lime Tweed will turn out good eventually.

O-line is the only thing almost stopping us from being rad.

by Mechem on Feb 17, 2009 12:46 AM EST up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to BTSC, a blog dedicated to the SIX-time world champion Steelers.

"Thoughtful discussion with a sense of history."

Art Rooney Jr.

"Level-headed thinking." Pittsburgh Post-Gazette

Terrible Towel Talk

Listen to internet radio with Michael Bean on Blog Talk Radio


Site Founder & Editor

Imag0299_small Michael Bean

Steelers Historian

Steeler_small maryrose

Bison_small Neal Coolong

Contributing Authors

Small Ivan Cole (RickVa)

Franco72_small 5020

Btsc_head_shot_small Rebecca Rollett

Small big_jay71

284942_small John Stephens

178896_499126548441_596563441_5939410_7960015_n_small Anthony Defeo