State Of The Steelers Roster: The Defensive Line
Like I did last year on BTSC, I again plan to take a crack at breaking down the state of the Steelers roster heading into the free agency period and the build up to the NFL Draft. The objective is to take a look back at the most recent play by position, the ages and contract statuses of the relevant players at that position, and then make some reasonable evaluations of what the Steelers front office may do moving forward in the immediate and intermediate future. Let's start it out with a look at the unheralded but consistently impressive defensive line.
TOP 5 STEELERS DL IN 2008
| Player | Age | 2008 Cap Hit |
2009 Cap Hit | Years Remaining |
| Casey Hampton | 31 (Sept) | $ 5,378,043 |
$ 6,652,000 | 1 |
| Aaron Smith | 32 (Apr) | $ 4,755,760 |
$ 3,950,000 | 3 |
| Brett Keisel | 30 (Sept) | $ 3,151,340 | $ 4,998,000 | 1 |
| Chris Hoke | 32 (Apr) | $ 1,481,240 | $ 1,675,000 | 3 |
| Travis Kirschke | 34 (Sept) | $ 983,360 | $ 1,300,000 | 1 |
There's more...quite a bit in fact...after the poll and the jump. Hold off on voting until you read on however. Seriously. Mike Tomlin disapproves of short-cuts. So should you.
Yikes. I'll take some Infusion Of Youth for $500, Alex.
In all actuality though, we're in pretty darn good shape in 2009. Provided the DL doesn't get ravaged by the injury bug any more so than it did early on in the 2008 season, this DL is a very safe bet to anchor another top 5 rush defense and again pave the way for special statistical seasons for our attackers on the outside - Wood and Deebo.
Let's see...Keisel's got a good year in him in 2009, regardless of his future after that. When healthy he's still got a motor that runs with the best of them and can disrupt some things in the passing game with his vertical leap and above average sense of timing. Aaron Smith again proved his truly special durability and value in 2008. Casey Hampton recovered from an abysmal start to his year after showing up to camp out of shape. By year's end, after coming back from injury and benefiting from some needed rest at the end of the season, Hampton again helped anchor one of the NFL's very best rush defenses - not to mention occupied blockers alongside Smith so that James Harrison and LaMarr Woodley could do their thing against single coverage most of the time.
Still, you can count on replacements being secured for Kirschke, Keisel, and as we'll debate later, even Hampton in this coming Free Agency period and in the Draft. And of course, there will be intense competition for one of the final 53 roster spots and practice squad spots amongst a crop of undrafted free agents and former practice squad journey men that our scouts feel are worth keeping an eye on. That will all play out as it will. But by looking at the top 5 on our depth chart above, it sure looks like the Steelers will use two of their top five picks on defensive linemen, be it at DT or DE.
2008 KEY DL RESERVES - Age; 2009 Cap Hit; Years Remaining; 2008 Cap Hit
Nick Eason - 28 years old; $678,000; 1 year remaining; $667,300
Orpheus Roye - 36 years old; 2009 Free Agent; $485,000
Reserves Analysis:
A special shout out to Nick Eason, who played in 15 games this year and did all that was asked of him, beginning with a highlight game in Week 1 against the Texans registering 4 tackles and 1/2 a sack. Obviously I don't see the Steelers extending Eason for multiple years, but who knows exactly what might happen to him in 2009 and 2010 more notably. It depends on a myriad factors, including but not limited to our Draft decisions this year; the development (or lack of) from 'project' type young'ns, what he'd be willing to sign for, etc. We'll see. After seemingly being frequently frustrated with Eason in 2007, I distinctly remember Eason doing much better in 2008, as well as reading several reports about how he had impressed his coaches with his progress this past year. So hopefully he'll be ready to go again in 2009 if called upon. And if that's all we can count on from him, I'd be more than content and satisfied with his tenure in Pittsburgh.
(When you're coming off a Super Bowl victory, it's so much easier to give a salute to guys like Eason than when your team came up short, is it not? Ha! Kidding aside, he was a contributor in many ways to this Super Bowl, even if those ways were smallish in magnitude. Eason played some ST as well don't forget. But yeah, point stands..much easier to be pleased with reserve contributions when you win!)
As for Roye? Good signing. Good risk-reward play by the Steelers brass. Surely some younger player will at least have the chance to knock him out of the mix in 2009, but if Roye decides to stay in shape and play again in 2009, he'll surely find an opportunity to do so on someone's depth chart, be it in Pittsburgh in an emergency role or elsewhere.
Not yet mentioned: Scott Paxson. A DT that the Steelers acquired undrafted out of Penn State. Hopefully a year with the Steelers strength and conditioning coaches has helped Paxson put on some serious weight and strength to that 290 pound frame of his that he entered the league in.
<aside>Wow, just realized that I referred to a 290 pound person as undersized. RIDICULOUS</aside>
There's no way to really know just yet, but what the organization thinks of Paxson could have some bearing on the ranking of the Steelers numerous contingency plans that they head to the war room with when the 2009 Draft is held in New York City a few months from now.
SALARY COMPARISON ACROSS NFL
The following is an ordered list of DTs ranked by their 2008 cap hit. This is just me providing you with consolidated information to get a better idea of what kind of scratch we're talking about market value wise when evaluating the likelihood of certain Steelers players being extended. Their ages are included as well. There are no clear as day patterns here or anything like that - there's a wide mix of 1st, 2nd, and 3rd contract type players here and lots of different conclusions can be drawn.
DEFENSIVE TACKLES / NOSE TACKLES
- Dan Klecko (PHI) - $10,651,720 (28 years)
- Pat Williams (MIN) - $8,400,124 (36 years)
- Albert Haynesworth (TEN) - $7,250,003 (27 years)
- Cornelius Griffin (WAS) - $6,166,333 (32 years)
- Tommie Harris (CHI) - $6,031,862 (~26 years)
- Kris Jenkins (NYJ) - $5,900,000 (29.5 years)
- Marcus Stroud (BUF) - $ 5,668,706 (30.5 years)
- CASEY HAMPTON (PIT) - $ 5,378,043 (31.5 years)
- Rocky Bernard (SEA) - $ 5,066,626 (~30 years)
- Gerard Warren (OAK) - $5,000,000 (30.5 years)
I don't even want to know whyy Dan Klecko earned close to $10 in bonuses last year, so let's consider that an insane outlier and just look at the rest of the list. Pat Williams is getting paid because all he does is clog gaps. Just like Casey Hampton. Even at the tender age of 36 though. Williams signed that big deal with Minny when he was 33 years old, which would roughly be the same for Hampton when he becomes a free agent in 2010. What it's really going to come down to is two things: 1) Will Hampton accept a deal that continues to pay him in the top 10 at his position, rather than the top 5 or top 3 even? If the answer is a yes then it may just come down to 2) If he shows up to camp in shape. If he does..as in like, really in shape and eager to pull his weight in a run at a repeat, then it very well could happen.
Onward.
- Julius Peppers (CAR) - $ 14,137,500 (28 years)
- Aaron Schobel (BUF) - $ 8,723,555 (~31.5 years)
- John Abraham (ATL) - $ 8,501,920 (30.5 years)
- T-Sizzle Suggs (BAL) - $ 8,475,000 (26 years)
- Jared Allen (MIN) - $ 8,002,531 (~27 years)
- Kabeer Gbaja-Biamila (GB) - $ 7,726,828 (~31.5 years)
- Jason Taylor (WAS) - $ 7,500,000 (34.5 years)
- Luis Castillo (SDG) - $ 6,989,380 (25.5 years)
- Mario Williams (HOU) - $ 6,881,720 (24 years)
- Richard Seymour (Pats) - $ 6,836,720 (~29.5 years)
- Let's count our lucky stars that DE Aaron Smith is locked up through the 2011 season, when he'll 35 years of age. I honestly wouldn't be the least bit surprised if Smith remains productive until he's closer to 40 than 35. He's so durable. 2007 was the first year of his career that he missed even one game after tearing his biceps against New England.
- What about Casey Hampton? Well, let me just say this first. I think that it's too frequently that we immediately discount the possibility of guys in their 30s coming off their second contract to get extensions. 'The Steelers just don't do that' is what's usually said. Well, that's true but not universally. There's another myth out there that the 'Steelers are cheap and don't pay their older players.' Also not true. Here are the Steelers league rank in terms of payroll the past five years: 2008: 6th; 2007: 9th : 2006: 23rd ; 2005: 10th ; 2004 22nd.
The reality is the Steelers seem to be flexible with their spending limits. We've seen that with James Farrior, who signed a long term deal with substantial guarantees. And we're about to see it with James Harrison, who most would have said a year ago at this time was likely to be headed elsewhere after the 2009 season. Myself included. I'll hold off on fleshing this out, but let's just say I believe we're entering a four year window where the Steelers can legitimately achieve dynastic greatness. As in perhaps two more Super Bowls; and being a touch more conservative, let's just say the opportunity to host playoff games and make a run for the next four years as Ben enters his prime years, Santonio takes his game to the next level, Woodley and Deebo continue to reign terror on the league, our offensive line gets cleaned up, etc. etc. There's one area on the team where there's less certainty about 2-4 years down the road and that's the defensive line. We've got Aaron Smith for the run at greatness. I'd imagine that someone will get drafted on Day 1 this year to fill in for Brett Keisel in 2010, as well as a 2nd Day selection or two to compete for jobs with guys like Kirschke, Eason, Paxon.
-
Shoring up the offensive line, finding a replacement for Keisel, and since so many of you want to see B-Mac let go, a CB to fill in for him, AND for DeShea as he gets well into his mid 30s..well, there's only so many picks we have. (This is why we need to re-up either B-Mac or Big Snack..period. Can't let both walk and expect to accomplish our other goals this Draft.) So as it relates to Big Snack Hampton, I'll stop here and just say that I hope we find a way to keep him around to help us achieve those lofty goals floating out there in our most optimistic of projections. Guys like Snack don't grow on trees. In fact, they don't even come around every year; or five years really. He's that good when healthy. And at just 31 years of age, I hope like hell we at least keep the door open for re-signing him late this summer. What I'd do? See what kind of shape he shows up to Latrobe in after a summer of basking in Super Bowl glory. He was embarrassed last camp. Show up ready to eat, figuratively speaking on the field, then sign the dude and let him retire a Steeler and make a run at Canton having worn just one jersey.
25 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Right on the money about Aaron Smith.....
….and we all know that Aaron and his wonderful families are Steelers for Life.
The key to your Hampton question – of course – is your assumption “that he shows up to camp in much better shape than last year.” I don’t think any of us expect a repeat of last year, but I’m not sure how much of an improvement we can expect.
If Tomlin is able to get Big Snack to show up at camp in playing condition, it’ll be a miracle. Two more, and MT will be eligible for sainthood. Pax vobiscum.
Disagree about Hampton
First, your poll question may be moot, since there’s about a 75% chance that he comes in about the same shape. Second, Pat Williams aside, there isn’t a good track record for guys his side in their mid-late 30’s. Lastly, he only plays good in spurts now – imagine in a few years. He was not very good for most of 2007, and after about 4 games from the last bye week, he wears down and can barely hold single blocks, let alone force teams to double him.
I have no doubt that he’ll be a viable member of a DL rotation next year, and even after that, but his days of being effective playing full time are nearing their end, and if he stays, he’s going to have to take quite a bit less. If we extend him this off season, I think it will be (or should be, anyway) for a cheaper final contract like Hines may get.
Aaron Smith will be the anchor of the line for a few more years, and hopefully we’ll get a half decent NT in the near future who can split time with and eventually replace Hampton.
charity standing orders
certainly reasonable assesment
I happen to think Hampton has better years than you’re giving him credit for left in him. But your logic makes perfect sense. And I think I also contended that Hampton would need to agree to stay in the Bottom half of the top ten salary wise to have any chance of staying. If he wanted top 5 or top 3 money, not likely at all.
by Michael Bean on Feb 17, 2009 10:04 AM EST up reply actions
as for him showing up in 'equal shape'
I think it will be QUITE obvious to Coach Tomlin and the front office if Hampton is doing the things that athletes can do in their young 30s to stay as healthy and fit as possible. Hampton will work harder than ever this summer..ala James Farrior..and will have a totally noticeable edge about him coming into camp, or he’ll just be Big Snack and kind of just be there. I happen to think that might make a bit of a difference in the decision. Won’t be deciding factor, but might at least make the Steelers sit down at the bargaining table and see what Hampton would be willing to consider.
I suppose we agree that ultimately ball will be in his court to decide what he’d sign for, but I also think he can help his cause and make the Steelers think twice about losing a guy of his caliber.
As for him wearing down, remind me again where we got gashed up the gut in the running game this year after he returned from injury? Or before for that matter when we handled Baltimore and Jacksonville early on. It’s not a one man show but he still is the one guy most responsible for making it literally next to impossible to run against the Steelers up the gut.
by Michael Bean on Feb 17, 2009 10:14 AM EST up reply actions
Believe it when I see it
I’m just not sure about Hamp coming to camp in shape. I trust Tomlin to get his point across to these guys that they need to be ready for this coming year, but I’m not convinced that Hamps gonna listen. He’s never been one for offseason training sessions. I think we’ll have a better idea on this as time goes by if he shows up for all the optional offseason activities.
by Chicago Steeler on Feb 17, 2009 10:21 AM EST up reply actions
we shall see
You’re right, he’s never been one for the offseason. Takes a kind of pride in not doing shit in fact. hehe.
by Michael Bean on Feb 17, 2009 10:29 AM EST up reply actions
Snack
failed to draw consistent double teams late in games in the second half of the season. While his run-stopping productivity never really changes, his ability to occupy interior lineman on double-team blocks during the pass rush decreases exponentionally the longer a drive wears on. He starts to lose his steam on about the fifth-sixth play of a long drive and generally only stiffens near the goal-line.
His weight ballooned significantly late in the season, and Hoke was getting a LOT of playing time in Nickle/dime defenses w/Snack on the sidelines. Casey was most likely playing at somewhere north of 385lbs. by the end of the season. Likely right around 400#‘s. His knees and heart probably won’t hold out at that weight for more than a couple more years.
As much as i hate to say so, Casey will need substantial help after mid-season from here on out in his career. His drop-off was partly to blame for the fall-off of Silverback and Wood’s sack numbers, too. Casey could pretty much do nothing on run downs and be a factor, but he really loses steam on pass-plays late in games.
Extednd Kiesel and Hampton for 2-years
Blitz,
I wouldn’t be surprised if Hampton and Kiesel were extended two years. The cap hit for both are pretty big this year so I think that the team would look seriously at giving them some of that in a bonus and extending their deals by a year or two. The same could go for Hines Ward, too. I think Kendall Simmons could be cap cut, especially if he is slow to heal and doesn’t play better than he did before he got injured.
This team has a great window and getting some young depth on the DL (hitting in the draft or free agency this year) will be great for Smith, Big Snack and Kiesel. I do think that Kirschke might not be around next year. This team is going to need some spots for its young DL that it take in this year’s draft.
Thoughts?
yeah i think keisels a candidate for two years
Not so sure Snack would accept 2 years though – unless there were boat loads guaranteed. If he’d be willing, it’d make a lot of sense, but he could be giving up 10+ million guaranteed by not looking for a 5 year deal with 20+ mil in guarantees somewhere else. Fingers crossed, at least on my end.
DaTruth, any guys from a year or two ago – like a Kyle Clement – that could be brought back? Or is it just wait and see to see who the new crop of young guys will be, hopefully with a few early round draft picks in the mix.
by Michael Bean on Feb 17, 2009 10:41 AM EST up reply actions
weight clause for snack?
i don’t know if this jives with the CBA or if such a clause is legal, but it would be interesting to see if the brass would ask Snack to take lower base pay in return for bonus incentives tied to his weight. again, i don’t know if it can be done, but that would seem to benefit both parties in the sense that the Steelers can get a lower cap number and Snack can get fair market value so long as he pulls his weight (so to speak) in the off-season…
by weegie thompson lives! on Feb 17, 2009 10:50 AM EST reply actions
I don't think that exists
But you can fine a player for not maintaining a certain weight. That’s why all those big guys got busted for using that diuretic earlier this year. They cut water to make their weekly weigh-in so they don’t get fined. So all the weight clause does is have guys dehydrating themselves every week, which is both dangerous and counterproductive. There should be a bodyfat % clause instead.
Jordan Reffet just signed
For what it’s worth. Don’t know if he has the ability to replace Keisel or if he’s just another one of those guys who goes to camp for three years and then fades away. He is on the books to make $385 this year since he was with us last year.
Thoughtful discussion with a sense of history
Beat me to it
Was about to hit the reply button, but decided to read the latest comments. Someday I’ll break a story here on BTSC… Someday…
by Chicago Steeler on Feb 17, 2009 11:16 AM EST up reply actions
I would like to keep both Snack and Bmac
Met Bmac family at the SB and they were made cool. I saw Snack take at least 4 or 5 centers in push them 5 yards in the backfield with their backs not face mask facing him. He pushed the AZ center to the ground on his needs.
FYI, I can’t see Snack being tired since he only plays 1 or 2 downs every 4 downs. If we stop them and put them in 2nd and long, he comes out of the game. He comes out every 3rd down anyway. I still think he has a lot in the tank.
I’m on the fence with Bmac since we have Gay, who’s performed well. Concerned about him getting beat by Marvin (who dropped it) and Armani. However, I’m not sold on Ike and would like Dmac as insurance. Ike is turning into Deion Sanders, all pass defense and poor tackling.
Reffett could surprise, K. Clement released
Blitz,
J. Reffett is acutally 6’6’’, 295. He flashed some in the preseason, but I guess he didn’t do enough for them to keep him. He’s athletic and have decent feet for his size. I remember one play in the preseason where a blocker on the line tried to cut him and he leaped over him, landed on his feet and showed some burst trying to get to the QB. I mentioned him to Dale Lolley during the preseason to get his thoughts and Lolley said he seemed like “a big kid with a good motor.”
K. Clement had micro-fracture surgery this past year. If and when he recovers fully, the team might give him another look. Those type of surgeries are normally 2-year injuries as far as a player getting back to where he was before he got hurt. They thought enough of him to have him on IR this past year before releasing him a few weeks ago.
Having seen only glimpses of Reffett and Scott Paxson in the preseason, I was more impressed with Reffett. With them adding Paxson to the roster earlier in the season, I guess that meant they may have future plans for him. That’s all I got on that.
By the way, how come no one is talking about that LT from Penn State, Gerald Cadogan. He looks like a good candidate for a swing tackle/guard that could pay big dividends in two years. He held up pretty good at LT during the times I saw Penn State play this year. Thoughts?
Former GM Mike Lombardi on M. Starks and other Free Agent Offensive Tackles
Guys, check out what former Raiders GM and NFL.com analyst Mike Lombardi said about the current crop of 2009 free agent offensive tackles. He wasn’t that complementary of Starks or Marvel Smith. Check it out:
Notes From Lombardi: Free Agent Tackles
FROM MICHAEL LOMBARDI:
The free-agent signing period begins soon and with that in mind, the National Football Post continues its daily breakdown of the 2009 free agent class. Today, the NFP breaks down the offensive tackle position.
OFFENSIVE LINE REMINDERS
1. Must be smart to learn and respond to a fast-changing game. He has to be quick-minded along with book smart. Mental mistakes kill the QB. A test score of 20 is the average in the NFL.
2. Mental toughness is key. Can he play with pain? Can he practice with pain? Does he miss practice? How many practices has he missed in 4/5 years?
3. Former shot putters and discus throwers are normally very good linemen. Did he do this in high school?
4. Arm length and hand size are critical. This allows positional flexibility.
5. Can he block on the second level? What fronts does he play against?
6. Does he have an anchor? Can he get an anchor? Who pushes him?
7. Any former DT’S/DE that might be good conversions? Did they play it in high school? Bad programs need all their best players on defense, but they might be better suited for offense. Know what offensive linemen have been all-state defensive linemen.
8. How does he play on the road? Can he hear the count and come off the ball in a tough crowd?
9. Three and four-year starters are going to find a way to play in the NFL at this position.
10. Can he play a second position in the line? Can he snap the ball?
11. What is their main protection in the line? We do more than slide here.
12. Can an offensive guard play on an island in pass protection? Does the center slide to him? Can he protect on a two-way go?
13. What kind of run plays do they run? Can he block our running game?
14. Does he play with a man over his head or in the gap? Can he block one on one?
15. We need competitive players here, on and off the field.
16. Fat guys have short careers. We need big, but that does not mean fat.
17. Pay close attention to his weight progression from year to year. What does he weigh at the Combine? And what does he weigh a week before the draft? We must know what weight we are getting. Fat guys like being fat.
18. Short players need to have long arms and must have an ability to play with power.
19. What is the level of experience of the coach who coaches him? How many years did he have the same coach? What pro players has he coached?
20. An offensive linemen who had a red-shirt year must be able to become a starter. We need to have quality back-ups because they always play.
21. Must evaluate every tight end who is over 6-5 and 270 as a potential OT. Players play positions in college because of a lack of talent, not because it’s the right position for them. Any slow (5.10) tight ends that might be tackles?
NOTE: THERE ARE SOME PLAYERS MISSING FROM THE LIST, BUT THEY’RE PLAYERS WHO HAVE OPTION CLAUSES IN THEIR CONTRACTS THAT ARE VOIDABLE, AND ONCE THEY VOID, THEY BECOME FREE AGENTS. I WILL HAVE THAT LIST AT THE START OF UFA (UNRESTRICTED FREE AGENCY).
STARTERS LEFT OFFENSIVE TACKLE
Name, age; height, weight; speed; agent
Jordan Gross, 28; 6-4, 300; 5.11; Ethan Locke — The prize of the UFA market. Not often do you see a young left tackle make it to the market, and I’m not sure he does. Once the Panthers realize they cannot get Peppers signed, they will turn their attention to franchising Gross.
Khalif Barnes, 26; 6-5, 320; 5.12; Ken Zuckerman — Barnes is a good player, but not a great player, and his contract level will be the most interesting nugget of the UFA market. He can play left tackle but is limited in power and the ability to handle the edge all the time. Part of the key to free agency is to not overpay for this kind of player.
POTENTIAL STARTERS LEFT OFFENSIVE TACKLE
Marvel Smith, 30; 6-4, 320; 5.27; Ken Zuckerman — If his back was OK, he would be signed, but back injuries and tackles don’t mix well. Teams must protect themselves with his contract and not count on 16 games.
Tra Thomas, 34; 6-7, 350; 5.39; Peter Schaffer — One-year player, but he can help a team in transition like the Eagles. Thomas must have a talented player behind him because you can’t count on him being a 16-game starter.
BACK-UPS LEFT OFFENSIVE TACKLE
Kirk Chambers, 29; 6-7, 313; 5.45; Steve Dubin — His value lies in his versatility and ability to play along the line. He’s not a power player and must go to the right team.
STARTER RIGHT OFFENSIVE TACKLE ONLY
Vernon Carey, 27; 6-4, 333; 5.33; Ben Dogra — Moved back to his natural position, and if he doesn’t get signed in the next few days, I expect the Dolphins to place the Franchise Tag on him. They cannot afford to lose a young starting OT.
Max Starks, 26; 6-7, 337; 5.59; Eugene Parker — I know he played left tackle, but watch the tape; the Steelers never left him on an island. He might be able to play left tackle, but the play caller must make sure he is always helped in protection.
John St. Clair, 31; 6-5, 315; 5.46; Ben Dogra — Similar to Starks, St. Clair played left tackle but is more suited to right tackle. Now that Tait has left, look for the Bears to get him signed. They need some stability at the position. St. Clair needs to have the right contract, but the Bears cannot overpay for him.
Jon Stinchcomb, 29; 6-4, 315; 5.11; Pat Dye – A soft tackle and not a bona fide starter, but he can start. He’s a liability against certain levels of competition. Must not overpay.
Mark Tauscher, 31; 6-2, 320; 5.33; Neil Cornich — Injuries are a concern and lack of foot speed is a huge concern. But he does know how to play and will find a way to play if he can pass the physical.
BACK-UPS RIGHT OFFENSIVE TACKLE ONLY
Stacey Andrews, 27; 6-6, 342; 5.11; Rich Moran — Has the skill level to play tackle but does not have the experience to make you feel certain he can do the job. He might be a tease — good talent, no production. Might be able to play guard and fill in some.
George Foster, 28; 6-4, 338; 5.2; Phil Williams — The more he has to play, the less you like.
Daniel Loper, 26; 6-6, 306; 5.38; Leonard Roth — Not sure what to do with him. He’s looked acceptable in the preseason after four years of coaching with Mike Munachek. Need to work him out. He’s young, tough and has great size. Interesting player. He has played right and left guard and tackle. If he goes to the right scheme, he might produce.
EMERGENCY RIGHT OFFENSIVE TACKLE ONLY
Jon Runyan, 35; 6-7, 330; 5.35; Ben Dogra – Had a major knee surgery, and his lower body looks bad right now. Can’t go through camp, so he would be perfect for an emergency role.
For those who want to read about Lombardi’s other position grades and thoughts on the NFL, go to http://www.nationalfootballpost.com/2009/02/notes-from-lombardi-free-agent-tackles/ . He’s always a pretty good read in my book and calls it like he sees it as a former GM.
Thoughts?
yea thats very interesting stuff
I’d like to take a closer look at breaking that down on the main page. Thanks for this truth.
by Michael Bean on Feb 18, 2009 8:29 AM EST up reply actions
Look to the Draft
I think its a 50/50 proposition that they try and resign Hampton. They got rid of Joel Steed when he turned 30. There is a precedent for the Steelers overhauling the position at the 30 yead old threashhold.
I know the importance of the NG in the 3-4, but can you justify resigning a plus 30 guy who only had 22 (13 solo tackles/9 Assisted) in 13 games started, and who came in camp grossly out of shape.
I think they will be patient and take a wait and see mentatlity. If he doesn’t get an extension, I think it’s a sign that he won’t be with the Steelers in 2010. If they draft, a big boy in the middle, I think he will be gone as well.
I would draft a NG and roll with Hoke in 2010. They did go win about 12 to 13 games with Hoke as the starter.
For Hampton...
… one year coming to camp in shape won’t diminish the effects of all the years he didn’t. Linemen (anyone really) who puts their body through that sort of trauma tend to fall off a cliff physically eventually. A renewal here will very likely only replace Jason Gildon as the standard of a bad contract extension.
Keisel on a two year contract extension would be good.
by Marvin, The Paranoid Android on Feb 17, 2009 8:31 PM EST reply actions
The Problem is
it is very difficult to find the particular physical requirements required to be an effective 3-4 nose tackle. In last years draft the main player that fit that mold was Nagata who went to Baltimore. We will be having fits with him for years to come. In this years draft you have that kid from Boston College who definately won’t be available at pick 32. Ideally a player has to be at least 320 to anchor the line and occupy multiple blockers. The stats don’t tell the whole story with Hamp. We have been tops against the run year, after year,after year. It’s not because Foote is our inside linebacker. If I was the front office I would offer one more contract. Massive nosetackles don’t grow on trees.
Re sign Hampton a no brainer to me.
So what if he comes into camp a bit out of shape. They eventually kick his ass all the way through training camp and get him ready to go. I honestly believe he has 2-3 good years left playing on 1st and 2nd downs. I don`t think he is an every down player, but we don`t need him to be. When we are backed up on the goal line and get a huge stop, who do you think makes that possible? That`s right…the big snack attack. His ability to be completely unmovable can not be replaced by a 2nd round or later pick. Yeah it would be nice to get the big NT out of BC but he will be gone. Because we need O-line and DE right now, i think we sign Snack to a 3 year deal and use our first pick on a NT in next years, or the year afters draft.
by SteelerDomination on Feb 18, 2009 2:25 AM EST reply actions 1 recs
rec'ed
Hear hear. My thinking exactly. We did have a lot of goal line and 4th down stuffs to. He’s at the center of all that.
but it’s really your assesment that there’s no replacement to be had at #32 and it’s not worth sluffing off picks to move up given our other needs.
by Michael Bean on Feb 18, 2009 8:32 AM EST up reply actions
Not sure Hampton will want to resign
He perceives himself as effective on the field coming into camp out of shape and thought the whole Tomlin thing last summer was a joke that wasn’t very funny. Many teams are switching to the 3-4 this off season and not many have a quality NT, they’ll realize what they’re missing during the next season. Someone will offer him more $ or more years than he’s worth and I think he has enough bad memories here to balance out the good ones. He is not gonna want a 2 year extension because he is still at an ae where he can get a last big payday. He’s not gonna let that slide out 2 years and miss the window of opportunity. As much as it would work out for our team to get a couple extra years out of him and then dump him, that is the worst possible outcome for him outside of career ending injury this year.
yup, good point
That’s the problem. We’d have to offer him three years or more most likely, or like I mentioned, gobs of guranteed money. We’ll see! It’s an interesting sub plot to me. Folowed Big Snack since I was in Austin in high school during his days there.
by Michael Bean on Feb 18, 2009 8:33 AM EST up reply actions

by 






















