Is Santonio Holmes the Real Offensive MVP of the NFL?
By design, voting for the NFL's MVP Award takes place after the regular season and before the playoffs. Each player gets the same 16 opportunities to make a case for the award. Peyton Manning was deemed this year's Most Valuable Player after 16 games. So be it. But let's project the real Most Valuable Players, after the entire body of work ending February 1. Is it fair to project Santonio Holmes as the NFL's Most Vauable Offensive Player? (James Harrison, of course, would be the MVDP.)
Holmes caught 55 passes this past season for 821 yards and five touchdowns. If you are a "stat geek," you probably don't want to read any more of this. Isaac Bruce, a guy who I honestly didn't think was in the league anymore, had better numbers than Holmes in all three areas. If "valuable" translates to "statistical," then indeed Peyton Manning or Drew Brees, ringing up the pass register, will be your Most Valuable Player. But if valuable really means valuable, and the team that wins the Super Bowl can rightfully claim a higher stake in what was valuable to them, then Santonio Holmes is your guy.
The Steelers had to beat an outstanding Baltimore Raven team three times this year in order to get to the promised land. As two monster defenses collided, only one player on the Steelers offense scored a touchdown in any of those three games. Santonio Holmes. And he scored touchdowns in all three games. The Steelers were getting handled 13-3 in the first game, when Holmes took a short slant pass all the way to the house electrifying both the crowd and the Steelers defense, who scored themselves 14 seconds later. In the second game it was Holmes who kept both feet on the ground coaxing the ball as it broke the plane, a catch that may have been the difference between playing three road games in the playoffs, or just two at home. In the playoff game, it was Holmes who played possum while Ben scrambled, again taking a short pass and running a long way across and then down the field for a score.
The Steelers played the Browns, at Cleveland, in the second game of the season when the Browns were still the media darlings of the AFC North. Holmes had a 100-yard game, including a 10-yard run for a first down, despite the rain and winds that were gusting up to 60 miles per hour. Pittsburgh was nursing a one-score lead in the third quarter, deep in its own territory, when Holmes made a beautiful 48-yard catch in heavy traffic. That play gave the Steelers a field goal and 10-point lead the Browns could not recover from.
Dallas came to town and just like Baltimore, was having its way against the Steelers, leading 13-3 in the third quarter. Pittsburgh fans were feeling bleak until late in the third, down 10 and with third down and 16 at their own 20-yard line, Holmes caught a 47-yard pass that gave the Steelers new life. He caught another one right after, but the Steelers came up short on a fourth-and-goal. Dallas still had to punt from inside its 20, and there was Holmes again, taking the punt 35 yards. He single-handedly got the team back in that game. Jeff Reed kicked a field goal and the momentum change was in full force.
Against Tennessee, even though Pittsburgh lost, Holmes caught a clutch 31-yard touchdown pass to get the Steelers back in the game, soon to take the lead. He also sealed the game against Washington with a TD grab, and his 28-yard touchdown against New England ignited that fire sale.
Against San Diego in the playoffs, when the money was on the table, there was Santonio again throwing in his ante. The Chargers were up 7-0 and got the ball back again. Holmes took a punt 67 yards for a score and Steelers fans felt like all was going to be well with the world again. They never looked back.
And then of course, the season-ending drive of NFL 2008. We have seen the Bradys and Montanas and Elways (and now Roethlisbergers), but have we ever seen a receiver with such impact as Santonio Holmes during the most important three minutes of any game? Four catches, all of them crucial, one better than the other, to get to the ultimate prize. Statistically that final catch was a mere six-yard completion. In reality, and these are the words of the NFL's Steve Sabol, "it was the greatest touchdown catch in NFL history."
What can be more valuable than the greatest touchdown catch in NFL history? In the NFL it's not what, but when and how. When the Steelers needed it the most, in the biggest games of the year and biggest moments within games, Santonio was money. His numbers didn't come against the Cincinnati Bengals, or in the blowout games. He wasn't called upon. His productivity came against the toughest opponents in the most difficult situations.
Statistics, with receivers, are often anomalies. Holmes wasn't needed or called upon in the first rout against Houston, the last rout against Cleveland, and a few games in between. Sometimes the defense will take a receiver out of a game by sliding into double coverage, rendering his value invisible, but indeed still important since it opens up other avenues. That's the nature of being a receiver. Holmes' value cannot be diminished because he plays for the Steelers and not the Saints. If anything, his value escalates because his plays were more important.
Yes, Holmes has had a few distractions off the field. He grew up as a poor youth in the notoriously rough parts of Belle Glade, Florda. I can neither relate to what that is like nor play God with his situation. His latest indiscretion cost him a game this season. While I think a couple of his legal brushes sounded much worse than they really were, I still admit I wish I never had to read them. Just imagine if the officials had not turned their attention from Holmes after he scored that last touchdown, called a 15-yard penalty and somehow the Cardinals complete a hail mary to win. Holmes might have been run out of the same town he ended up getting paraded through. If Pittsburgh had lost the Super Bowl, how much scolding would Holmes have taken for not catching the pass before the touchdown? If the Steelers missed the playoffs by one game, would the missed Giants game be used against him? We'll never really know all that, because things didn't turn out that way, though it's interesting how we are constantly reminded of that fine line between success and failure in the NFL. Regardless of all the what-ifs, the young man still will grow and mature and learn from his mistakes, like most young adults his age. Let's not make light of the need for that to happen amidst the Super Bowl euphoria as we think about Holmes' potential possibility to achieve greatness in the future.
Of course I am bias. My team just won the Super Bowl. If you are a Colts' fan you think this is sacrilegious. I won't argue with your statistics. But frankly, I think Larry Fitzgerald has a better case than Manning, and he never got a single vote, just like Holmes. Had Pittsburgh not succeeded in that final drive, I would believe that Fitzgerald would be the Offensive MVP of the NFL, so my thinking is not based on bias. It is based on the whole body of work beyond just 16 games. Just consider this: the Most Valuable Player in the NFL, James Harrison in my book, helped lead his team beyond the playoffs, not just one-and-done. And the Most Valuable Offensive Player, Santonio Holmes, wears the same color jersey. And isn't it interesting that two of the greatest plays in Super Bowl history include each of them?
0 recs |
23 comments
|
Comments
Good stuff as usual Maryrose…
I was so hoping for a big year from Tone, and although he didn’t have the break-out regular season everyone thought he would, he came up big when it counted as you do a great job showing in this piece.
I am hoping the Santonio finally fully figured out the game in the later part of the regular season, and hopefully there will be NO turning back from his dominace.
I'll drink your Milkshake, I'll drink it up!
by drinkyourmilkshake on Feb 23, 2009 2:12 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
;)
Great post, I must quote this:
In the NFL it’s not what, but when and how.
Big Players make big plays in big games.. ’Nuff said.
This game is about playing when it counts. Holmes(and the entire team) absolutely stood up and played when it counted. I’ll take that over stats any day!
When I say who dey, you say we dey.
by sn0wballz on Feb 23, 2009 2:13 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Good writing
but could you please take this down before his agent sees it ( :
Seriously, I don’t think that was the offensive MVP even of the Steelers (I would choose Ben over him) but you make a good case for why we should think of his season as very successful despite non-pro bowl numbers.
by SteelerBuddha on Feb 23, 2009 2:24 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Maryrose sums it up once again!
Maryrose should be getting a phone call from Fox Sports….she is obviously a much better writer than some of those clowns! Take Kriegel’s job! LMAO! Good stuff again and keep it up, as I always seem to enjoy your stories a lot. Thanks and I couldn’t agree more!
by SteelersFnRule on Feb 23, 2009 2:25 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
maryrose
is actually a guy…
I'll drink your Milkshake, I'll drink it up!
by drinkyourmilkshake on Feb 23, 2009 2:48 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
As always I enjoy your articles and your writing is superb. But my issue with the rationale is in two things:
1) If you are going to take the playoffs and super bowl into account when figuring out NFL MVP’s, then those MVP’s pretty much can only ever come from the super bowl winner.
2) Citing individual instances throughout the year and saying that is the basis for an mvp, in my opinion, is like how people take individual passages from the bible and say “see, god says it’s wrong to be gay.”
by worldtrip on Feb 23, 2009 2:44 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
I so want to recite a line from the 40 Year-old virgin...
In response, but I remember Blitz scolding us for making those kind of remarks, and I like it on here.
If your not sure which line it starts with: “You know how I know you’re ****”
"Damnit mom! You almost ran over Greg Lloyd!"
at an autograph signing back in 95. He walked out in front of our minivan, and my mom almost hit him. He apologized.
by PA ARMY OFFICER on Feb 23, 2009 2:59 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Though I do agree with number one of your assesment.
"Damnit mom! You almost ran over Greg Lloyd!"
at an autograph signing back in 95. He walked out in front of our minivan, and my mom almost hit him. He apologized.
by PA ARMY OFFICER on Feb 23, 2009 3:00 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
1) Not at all. I would not have picked an offensive MVP from the Giants last year, nor the Steelers of 2005, probably many others if I looked at it.
2) I looked at the whole body of work, including playoffs and Super Bowl, and made a conclusion about Holmes. I am not convinced they should change the MVP voting system. I am just making a de facto observation about Holmes and his value this season. That’s all.
Thoughtful discussion with a sense of history
by maryrose on Feb 23, 2009 3:00 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
I bet some fan of the Giants last year could have taken individual games and clutch performances and throws in the regular season and playoffs, as well as the super bowl, and said “Here is why Eli Manning should have been offensive MVP.”
by worldtrip on Feb 23, 2009 3:05 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
And I might disagree with them.
And if the Cardinals would have won this Super Bowl and someone plucked individual games and clutch performances of Larry Fitzgerald, I would absolutely agree with that. Therein lies the beauty of discussion boards like these.
Thoughtful discussion with a sense of history
by maryrose on Feb 24, 2009 10:38 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I found this an excellent read
With a good topic and supportive facts to bring us something of value to help carry us all through what is going to be a monumentally long offseason.
When’s the draft?!?!?!
"Damnit mom! You almost ran over Greg Lloyd!"
at an autograph signing back in 95. He walked out in front of our minivan, and my mom almost hit him. He apologized.
by PA ARMY OFFICER on Feb 23, 2009 3:05 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Nice writing MR and convincing
at first I scoffed at the title, but you make some great points. I knew he came up huge in the playoffs but I forgot how valuable his catches were during the year as well.
His year mirrored the whole offense…not great statistically but GREAT WHEN IT COUNTED!!! Which is all that matters!!!
Before this year I’ve been luke warm about Santonio. I liked him, knew he had talent, but always struck me as punk-ish and someone who would bolt for more $$$ as quick as possible. Well, I think he’s growing on me…yeah, maybe it’s the huge post season/SB he had…I honestly didn’t think he was capable of stepping up that big…but he also seems to be truly humbled by all thats happened. I like players who play big but remain humble, team players.
It will be interesting to see what happens when his contract is up. Does anyone know when it’s up?
Also, love the picture of Ben handing him the Lombardi…Ben just seems to be saying…“here you go kid, you deserve to hold this…great job.”
by SteelerMike on Feb 23, 2009 4:04 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Holmes had an inconsistent year, but he was definitely the team MVP of the playoffs. Considering we had just three playoff games, it’s hard to tell how that translates going foward. In the first 2 games, he did nothing outside of a punt return and a broken play that was basically a punt return. The SB was a real encouragement because he had a great all around day of RAC and good catches. However, count me among the unconvinced that Bruce Arians will ever get this offense close to what it could do, especially on a consistent basis. Holmes is a big part of that, and guys like him, Ben, and Miller all look inconsistent when the planning is poor and lackluster.
charity standing orders
by BadMaafala on Feb 23, 2009 4:08 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
I have always been a big fan of Holmes
(perhaps evidenced by the article itself). I was a huge fan when he was at Ohio State and kept making big plays. I even predicted before this season that he was going to be in the top 5 fantasy receivers, a prediction that did not make me look good. Of course, the Steelers offensively are not a good fantasy team to begin with.
I have convinced myself that his first two indiscretions were overblown, as sometimes those domestic things and public disturbance things can get, and he appears to me to be a quiet guy who is doing a pretty good job of raising three kids. I met him once with Maryrose and he was very nice to us, for whatever that is worth. I really think he’s the kind of guy who can and will mature and learn from his mistakes. Hopefully I am not fooling myself.
Thoughtful discussion with a sense of history
by maryrose on Feb 23, 2009 4:47 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
His maturity
will increase, I believe. Especially with Hines as his mentor, and its because of that reason that I think he has received such fame. What if he had TO or Ocho Stinko as his mentor, things would be much different. Instead of seeing a celebration after the biggest TD of his career, we probably would’ve saw one after each of the catches you mentioned in the post. I mean he responds to Hines with a “Yes, sir.” You can’t overlook that kind of respect. Still, I’ve had my doubts about him because of his legal troubles but in the end, this guy is confident in himself, and I love that in a player. His “Who dare to be great? I dare!” line just raised my respect for him a lot.
Also, it’s because of this maturation of his that I defend Sweed, IF he stays with us, unlike Mr. Nate, whom I wanted to stay, I believe he will attain much success. To sum things up, Holmes has the spotlight right now and I think he’s well deserving of it. Sure people may say “Oh, he was slacking at the beginning of the year, Nate had to do make up for his laziness…blah blah.” In the end it was Holmes and not Nate who made the game winning catch, and the best thing we can do right now is take pride in ourselves that we have such a great player on our team.
by paulamalu on Feb 23, 2009 7:42 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
S-Dime
I love S-Dime, I love the Steelers, but to say that Santonio is the offensive MVP of the league is a little absurd. S-Dime did make clutch plays down the stretch, but there were moments during the season in which he disappeared from games. I, like all of us, hope his playoff run and Super Bowl performance are a sign of the greatness to come, but I think its a little crazy to say that a handful of clutch plays throughout the year make him the MVP of the league. He got the hardware that matters the most and he played his ASSS off in Super Bowl 43. Lets just hope that his performance was a spring board to greatness and not just a flash in the pan.
by Heckler's Sports on Feb 23, 2009 8:02 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Good points MR
But if Santonio shows up consistently in any of those games there is no opportunity for the clutch play. This is why it’s so hard to rate “value”: did Holmes step it up when he needed to or was he underperforming most of the game? I don’t have the answer, but I’m leaning toward the latter.
Still, Tone comes through when you need him.
by CarlWeathersMustache on Feb 23, 2009 8:22 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I for one
Believe that our attrocious offensive line played a major part all season in hindering everyone’s offensive numbers. Santonio just didn’t show up occassionally or make a few clutch plays or underperform most of the game. The Steelers offense was out-manned and out coached in the trenches and that caused alot of dominoes to fall. The offense actually had to re-invent itself after about a third of the season when the line showed its weakness. This does not lend well for consistent output from a wide receiver or anyone. You may think I am exagerating and give me the “we won a Super Bowl, the line couldn’t have been that bad” line, but I disagree. We won because of everything BUT the line, we won in spite of the line. And if the line was just mediocre, no one would be talking about Holmes’ inconsistency or showing up only on occasion.
Thoughtful discussion with a sense of history
by maryrose on Feb 23, 2009 9:16 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
+1
Agree 100% on the fact that the very poor o-line play was a major factor for the opportunities & numbers not being there.. I remember there where a lot of play-actions or long-route plays where the receiver was wide open but Ben was laready in his back…
by The_Nation_in_Mexico on Feb 24, 2009 2:45 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Interesting
I was wondering how others felt seeing Plax catch that late TD to clinch it for the Giants, just after marquee receiver Randy Moss scored New England’s go ahead TD. Then Holmes turns around and does the same thing after Fitzgerald scored the go ahead TD for the Cardinals. Think of the irony in that. Go ahead and reflect.
Oh by the way good post. You could make a similar case for Fitzgerald.
"The team that scores the most points wins."
John Madden
(Master of the obvious)
by PixburghArn on Feb 24, 2009 9:26 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
Thanks
Big play threat! esp. in lieu of FWP, holmes provides that much needed speed threat on O, and he seems to be clicking with ben more and more. nice article.
by tkired on Feb 26, 2009 3:54 AM EST reply actions 0 recs

by 

























