BTSC 2009 Community Mock Draft - Pick #4 by the Seattle Seahawks: Eugene Monroe, OT, Virginia
The BTSC 2009 Community Mock Draft is gathering some steam, with the fourth pick submitted compliments of vherub. He and Steeler Mike come to mind as two of BTSC's longest standing draft afficionados (you twisted, twisted souls), coming up with good stuff for discussions about both the Steelers situation each draft, as well as the needs and potential solutions for other teams around the league. I enjoyed his write up for the Seahawks' selection at #4 not suprisingly. Many thanks! Up next: The Cleveland Browns, represented by a soul who knows a thing or two about the organization - maryrose. -Blitz-
********************
Eugene Monroe, OT, Virginia (Sr)
While the Seahawks haven't always been competitive, the NFC version of the team has. In the last five drafts, Seattle has had first round picks no lower than 23. So it is a little unusual to see them with the number four overall- even if it wasn't that long ago when "playoff drought" meant the 'Hawks (now people probably think of the Pirates, sigh).
Talking heads had Seattle leaning towards a WR (Crabtree) or a replacement for Peterson (Curry). With Housh recently signed, Crabtree isn't as critical to draft. And they still have Branch who they gave a 1st round pick for two years ago, as well as Nate Burleson, Koren Robinson, etc. But Crabtree and Curry are gone.
Some teams see a top 5 pick as a chance to get a franchise QB. And with Stafford still on the board, there is a strong indication Seattle picks him. Less than a month ago, Team President Tim Ruskell remarked "[W]e’re in that zone where we have to consider [a quarterback] every time there’s a free agency period, a draft" And he did personally attend Stafford's workout.
But nobody is writing off Hasselbeck yet, he's 33 and signed through 2010 (as is backup Seneca Wallace). Wallace isn't the future QB of this team, anymore than Batch was for the Steelers. Hasselbeck missed much of last season due to back injury, and the team suffered one of it's worst seasons in part because of that. But as long as Hasselbeck has recovered, this guy is an underrated, and yet effective QB who has led the Seahawks to numerous winning seasons and division titles.
Since coming to Seattle in one of those great, forgotten, one-sided trades in 2001 (Matt and Green Bay's 17th pick-used to draft Hutchinson for Seattle's 10th pick- Jamal Reynolds and 3rd rounder-Torrence Marshall), the Seahawks have been the dominant team in the NFC West. But he was also Holmgreen's QB and this is Mora's team now. Still, selecting a QB at 4 effectively destroys the team's relationship with Hasselbeck, and at the same time undermines the recent signing of Housh. TJ is 31, and will be 32 once football starts back up. His signing indicates Seattle's desire to win now, they are not rebuilding, and aside from last year, when injuries decimated the team, are built to compete in the present. Stafford is an interesting pick, but I'd think he would be worth more to trade out of the spot, than he would be for the Hawks to sit on for 1-2 years. During which time, if recent history is any indication, it will be a messy and delicate situation dealing with two franchise QBs. As much as Mora may or may not want his own QB, the Broncos mess loudly shouts warning.
Which finally leads to the actual selection, Eugene Monroe. I am surprised he is still on the board, perhaps the swirling stories about knee injuries have dragged him down. Those worries seem designed more to allow later teams, like the Bengals, to get a crack at him. The Seahawks would put due diligence in, and unless more information surfaces, I don't see this as a strike against him.
What I do see is the greatness of Walter Jones finally wearing down, and the need for another LT to take his place for years to come. The Seattle running game was weak last year (and while I don't know if the current running backs are ideal), much of that weakness arose from the offensive line. Mora has stated he wishes to re-establish the run. The Seahawks have resigned Ray Willis, but he has lined up at RT and G and was signed to solidify depth what with Floyd Womack going over to the Browns. Returning to Jones, at 35 and coming off micro-fracture surgery, his playing days are on the decline. Locklear isn't the heir to Jones, though he is a stable presence. Monroe is strong all-around, and his run-blocking skills are especially praised.
Eugene also was the reason Branden Albert played G instead of LT in college. This is no guarantee of anything, but that is a strong sign that Monroe can play at an elite level and be able to step in his 1st season if needed. And D'Brickashaw Ferguson's play in the NFL gives further weight to Virginia's program. He also has good moral fiber, which Ruskell pays more stock in than others. He is a hard worker and during his junior year (when he would line up against Chris Long in practice every day) he didn't allow a sack during the regular season. I think OT is a pick the fanbase can support and while I certainly hope Walter gives the team another year, it is increasingly doubtful he can perform for an entire year and beyond at his Hall Of Fame level.
BTSC 2009 Community Mock Draft Team Selections
#1) Detroit Lions - Jason Smith, OT, Baylor
#2) St. Louis Rams - Michael Crabtree, WR, Texas Tech
#3) Kansas City Chiefs - Aaron Curry, LB, Wake Forest
0 recs |
10 comments
| Add comment
|
Comments
This is the prime reason why I don’t think the Steelers should take a LT with their first pick and more than likely their 2nd. Top tier talent at that position will be gone in the top ten to fifteen. If you are taking a LT late in the first round the class would have to be super deep (which this years class is not), or it would have to be a huge reach.
I'll drink your Milkshake, I'll drink it up!
by drinkyourmilkshake on Mar 22, 2009 7:25 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Say what?
Are you saying that if we can’t get one of the top couple of tackles, we shouldn’t pick one at all? There are plenty of tackles this year worth a low-first or second-round pick that would not be a huge reach. They may not step in and start at LT from day one, but that is true for just about any rookie at any position. In any case, we have Starks to start at LT this year. What we could use is someone who can challenge Colon at RT. Certainly, there are plenty of starting tackles in the NFL that were not drafted among the first 10-15 picks.
by Steelin on Mar 22, 2009 5:29 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
So you would be happy with a tackle
like Oher or Britton or Loadholt at 1.32
I wouldn’t, just my opinion.
I'll drink your Milkshake, I'll drink it up!
by drinkyourmilkshake on Mar 23, 2009 12:11 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
You make a great case for ... Stafford!!
Monroe is a solid pick for the Seahawks but I like your reasoning behind Ruskell considering Stafford here. Going to a team with an established QB near the end of his career would actually be the best thing for Stafford. As long as Hasselbeck is healthy there is no argument about who is No. 1, so I don’t think the situation there would be delicate. There was a problem in Arizona when Leinart was basically handed the No. 1 job for a while but when Warner got a chance to play the debate was over. This isn’t really like the Denver situation at all, where Cutler is still a young QB and obviously a little insecure about his status with a new regime in place. Stafford is very young (just turned 21) and could learn for a couple years while the Seahawks remain competitive in a weak division. By year three, he should be ready to start and the Seahawks won’t have to re-sign Hasselbeck to a huge contract . And as you mentioned there is also the new head coach-new quarterback angle to consider as the team moves away from the Mike Holmgren era. The Seahawks are unlikely to draft low enough in the near future to have this kind of franchise QB drafting opportunity again. I could also see them trying to move down a few spots and picking Sanchez, perhaps even taking Sanchez at No. 4 if Stafford is already off the board.
However things could also work out just as you explained here. Monroe is a great prospect and would give the Seahawks a successor to Jones, although if Jones is successful in his rehab it’s quite possible that Monroe sits on the bench for a year or even two. The Seahawks are pretty deep at tackle with Locklear and Willis under contract for at least three more years and Jones under contract through 2011. His surgery reportedly went well in December and he is expected to be ready for training camp.
by steeler.lifer on Mar 22, 2009 5:51 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I spent a lot of time regarding stafford
But I didn’t even say everything I was thinking.
It’s not just the Denver situation, but Green Bay drafting Rodgers, and the Eagles drafting Kolb. It disrupts the team, and the fans and media get all riled up. And those guys were lower picks, so the teams didn’t have large contracts.
If Hassel is healthy and back to form, he will still be a top 10 qb in 2 seasons, at which point Stafford could very well be unproven. It’s a sword hanging over the team that hurts their chances to compete now.
by vherub on Mar 23, 2009 11:40 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
agreed
new coach too. he wont want to roll the dice with a rookie i dont think. Like the pick
by Blitzburgh on Mar 24, 2009 11:49 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Great selection
What if he’s Ryan Clady? Those guys are worth their weight in gold, as we Steelers fans know all too painfully.
Thoughtful discussion with a sense of history
by maryrose on Mar 22, 2009 8:28 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
But what is your next QB worth?
I agree with you MR, a potentially great OT is always a good pick so the Seahawks probably can’t lose by getting Monroe or Jason Smith in this situation. But how much is your quarterback for the next decade worth? The Steelers were kind of fortunate to have as high a pick as they did in 2004 and they obviously did the right thing in picking Ben. I wonder how the Oakland Raiders feel about the 2004 Draft, when they picked OT Robert Gallery, one of the most highly-touted college OTs of the past decade, at No. 2 overall with Rivers and Ben still available. If the Seahawks feel good about Stafford then this is an opportunity to use an unusually good draft position to get their next QB.
by steeler.lifer on Mar 22, 2009 11:46 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Interesting choice here
I see good arguments for both Stafford and Eugene here. Stafford may be a great choice to let sit for a couple of years and learn the system and mature. He has a great arm. On the other hand, while you may not think Seneca Wallace it the future, he’s been there a while and maybe shoring up the OL and improving the run game make Seneca more successful down the road.
by WolfpackSteelersFan on Mar 22, 2009 9:46 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs

by 


















