BTSC Checks In With Jim Wexell
If you've been around the site long enough, you know how much I like Jim Wexell's reporting and writing. I honestly don't get to as much as his stuff as I'd like to. As the publisher of SSteelCityInsider.com, there's always good stuff from either him or his well-respected and regarded roster. He's also, as you know since I've mentioned it at least 6 times, the author of Steeler Nation: A Pittsburgh Team, An American Phenomenon. I know we all love Dick LeBeau, so it's worth mentioning that the paperback re-release will have new material in it, including a lengthy candid talk with Coach Dad. If you've waited this long to read it, don't wait any longer once the paperback comes out. Anyway, Mr. Wexell was kind enough to take a few minutes to answer some questions I had as we enter the doldrums of the offseason leading up to the draft.
BTSC: So the latest news of course is the signing of CB Bryant McFadden out in Arizona. Could the Steelers really not afford to match a 2-year deal with just a paltry $5 million in guarantees? I have a hard time figuring out the logic of drafting a guy like McFadden in the 2nd round, letting him get some seasoning on two Super Bowl runs, then letting him walk at age 27. Seems like chasing one's tail, but as we usually say around the site, 'hard to second guess the organization's track record in this regard.'
Wexell: Let me just give you two quick reasons:
1.) Cap number. That may only have been a $10M contract, but at 2 years that's an immediate cap hit of $5M per. The Cardinals knew what they were doing. It acted as a poison pill for the Steelers, who are having cash flow problems and who want to get a deal done with James Harrison Superstar. And, 2.) We in the media have been expecting Bryant McFadden to ascend to the starting role ever since he was drafted, and just haven't been able to understand what's holding him back. Any time we go fishing (is it phishing?) with an assistant coach, and mention McFadden, we never hear what we expect: "Oh, he's on the verge. He just needs to ..." or "The guy in front of him does x better."
Someone mentioned to Mike Tomlin in a quiet moment that he liked the way McFadden plays the ball when it's in the air. Tomlin replied, "You'd rather have a cornerback who doesn't have to play the ball at all," meaning QBs throw on him. Sure, you'd rather have that, but that was a funny answer, and really one of the only telling ones to a media that's been phishing and never really getting any inside info. Hope that kind of helps answer your question.
BTSC: On a related note, any thoughts about whether or not the organization will be looking at a CB in either Round 1 or 2 in this year's draft? Or might they look for another William Gay type of talent in the 4th or 5th round to play some special teams, perhaps return kicks and eventually get phased in as Deshea Townsend winds down his career in the coming years?
Wexell: Kevin Colbert likes the depth at the position and has scheduled a visit with Joe Burnett and had a formal interview with Sherrod Martin. It looks like they're aiming for the middle rounds, but then again, if a guy like Darius Butler (UConn) falls to them in the first, I'd be stunned if they pass.
BTSC: I wrote quite a bit about Tony Hills just a few weeks ago, and how his development, or lack there of, might be one of the more important yet ignored topics of this offseason. I'll spare the gist of my argument, though it wasn't much of an argument for Hills so much as an attempt to argue that maybe the organization has some sort of plan/perspective on Hills and his development that we as fans are not at all privy to. We did all agree on this though - there's no way to know until we see him in pads going up against Deebo and Woodley this summer. Anything else you maybe have on him?
Wexell: I just see him down there working out. At the end of the season you could tell he had much more muscle definition in his body. Right now, no one wants to say anything about him, and they shouldn't. He's just another cog in the competition machine. You won't see much preseason probing of Jason Capizzi for that matter either. It's time to just let these guys compete.
BTSC: Do you think the Steelers flirtation with Joey Galloway was more a luxury they'd enjoy at the right price, or do they feel Limas Sweed isn't ready yet to be the team's No. 3 WR?Is getting a veteran WR still a priority?
Wexell: How can they feel Limas Sweed is ready? I mean, the Steelers are a bottom-line organization and they saw what we all saw. Yeah, we're all happy he gets off the line and can run and is big and strong, but the one drop, the one with the eyes wide open, left me feeling that he's scared and might never make it. Again, as with Hills, the guy has to prove it first. The Steelers will say all the right things if they don't come out of this draft with a WR, but it's a prove-it-to-me organization. Look how long it took Nate Washington to secure faith, and he showed a lot more as a rookie than Sweed did. Oh, to answer your question, they'll try to get a veteran No. 3 WR, but, again, with Mike Thomas coming in March 30-31, it appears they're targeting a WR for the upper middle rounds.
BTSC: Do you like WR Hakeem Nicks, and is he an option for Pittsburgh at No. 32?
Wexell: I would love to think so. He's my favorite. He's a guy who explains why later-round draftors have so much success. They don't have to answer to themselves about combine times and that nonsense. Sometimes they just get stuck with really good players, and Nicks is one of them. The problem will be -- and the reason I like guys like Thomas and Mike Wallace -- is that Nicks isn't a kick returner. But I'd be willing to take the chance. Make it real funny and use Darnell Stapleton to return kicks this year. What would be the difference at this point?
BTSC: Have you had much contact or at least seen much of Coach Tomlin in action since the beginning of the offseason? If so, any impressions about how he's handling things.
Wexell: Yes, I've said hello to him. I really enjoy running into him. He lifts your spirits just by remembering your name and asking about your kids. I loved his interview today (March 24) with Ed Bouchette in which he said he understands the need to make himself known to the public, but that after a certain point they don't need to know any more and that he'll begin withdrawing from the public eye. It made me remember Chuck Noll and how much I admired his lack of commercialism and need to be loved. I always thought Noll was a genius and see the same qualities in Tomlin. Before the combine, he was overheard telling his PR guy "But I don't want to get to know the national guys," meaning the national media. Local guys love hearing that stuff after a Super Bowl.
BTSC: So rumor has it James Harrison was back in the weight room just a few days after the SB win. To me, this tells me this guy needs football (physically and mentally) to be 'right'. I couldn't ever see him holding out for a few extra dollars if it meant not getting to scratch that necessary itch. I'm of course projecting bigtime from afar here, but how much does a player's personality and what the organization knows about how and what makes them tick - how much of that stuff might you say factors in to these negotiation processes?
Wexell: Yes, I reported that. He was actually in the weight room complaining that the rest of the team wasn't in there with him. I spoke with Lawrence Timmons during Super Bowl week and asked him about James's legendary regimen. Timmons, who's in great shape himself, said he tried to keep up with James but couldn't, said the guy just keeps coming back to the room all day long, said he puts in 10 hours a day. Yes, that's all James wants to do: Football and preparing for football. He will watch cartoons with his son the other couple of hours during the day. To answer your question, that means a lot to the Steelers, whose biggest draft-day measurement is a prospect's passion for the game. That work ethic got James Farrior a nice contract for his old age last year. It means a lot to them in their negotiations with Harrison this year.
BTSC: Willie Parker will be in a Pittsburgh Steelers uniform past the expiration of his current contract in 2010. True or False.
Wexell: I have to say false, just based on last year. RBs have a short shelf life and Parker's body has been breaking down. Then again, FWP has a superior work ethic as well. Prove me wrong, Fast One, prove me wrong.
BTSC: If you filled out an NCAA bracket, who you got cutting down the nets?
Wexell: I don't watch basketball at all anymore, only my daughter's games. I used to watch everything that moved, but only football now, and during the spring only college tape. In fact, I watched Brian Orakpo get killed at the point against Ohio State last night. The Browns would be making a big mistake in drafting him. I'd compare him, as a prospect, to Harrison, who wasn't even drafted, but surprised with his startling strength at the point. It would be foolish to perceive that kind of strength in Orakpo and draft him sixth. Nice pass rusher, but he didn't show he could drop and showed he won't be able to play the run in the league for a couple of years, if ever. Back to your question, I filled out Louisville just to steer clear of the mob picking Pitt. I'm in the middle of a 60-person soccer-fundraiser NCAA pool, which is led by my wife. She always wins this stuff.
4 recs |
32 comments
| Add comment
|
Comments
Blitz, Wex, great stuff as always.
charity standing orders
by BadMaafala on Mar 24, 2009 10:04 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
thanks Wex delivers as always
loved the part about deebo. what a machine. 10 hours!
by Blitzburgh on Mar 24, 2009 10:22 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Awesome stuff guys...
I think there are some really interesting thoughts from Wexell in the interview.
That work ethic got James Farrior a nice contract for his old age last year. It means a lot to them in their negotiations with Harrison this year.
One of the few good tokens about the contract situation that we have heard in a while and also interesting because it seems that even though his age is a concern his work ethic and ability to stay in shape are things that will help the process move forward. 10 hours a day is nuts, but it seems he has his priorities straight with family and work.
I also loved the stuff about Mike Tomlin; but then again I love to read anything about Mike Tomlin and how special he is as a coach and motivator.
I'll drink your Milkshake, I'll drink it up!
by drinkyourmilkshake on Mar 24, 2009 10:31 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Agree
Great interview. I loved getting his insight into Tomlin and Sweed, particularly Tomlin, since his approach has reminded me of much of what I’ve heard from former players about Noll.
by WolfpackSteelersFan on Mar 24, 2009 12:26 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Thanks Blitz and Wex
How do you read into the whole McFadden situation? Not that it matters.
Thoughtful discussion with a sense of history
by maryrose on Mar 24, 2009 11:19 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I thought it was interesting that he mentioned the cash flow problem as something that may have contributed to Bmac leaving. We’ve hypothesized around here that this could be an issue, but Wex is the closest source to the team that I’ve heard mention it.
$5M isn’t a lot for an NFL team, so it’s a little disturbing that cash flow would be a factor in that, considering they haven’t dished out much in the form of signing bonuses this off-season. Most of Kemo and Stark’s deals are paid in the form of game checks. I guess we just continue to hope that a Harrison deal will make us forget about McFadden.
Obviously Wexell is reading into the comments he’s heard from the coaches to guess that they weren’t that high on him to begin with.
charity standing orders
by BadMaafala on Mar 24, 2009 11:48 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Great insider perspective
I’m loathe to buy newletters on any of my favorite sports teams becasue there is just so much free informaiton out there. I might have to make an exception for Wexell’s newsletter, he’s clearly insightful and has a great perspective. One thing is for sure, I’m buying the paperback.
Well done!!
by Steev1705 on Mar 24, 2009 11:30 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
thanks steev
Really helps when we can help support Wex for his great work – lot easier to come get him to share with just a smidge of reciprocity. The book’s good stuff though. Not fluffy, but amazingly fast read. Good storytelling. Get to know the players and where they come from so much better. I think when you read it you’ll understand better why you won’t ever see Wexell counting out FWP from anything. Or rooting against him. Cheers.
by Blitzburgh on Mar 24, 2009 11:42 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Great Interview
Blitz, another good interview. Now the next challenge I give to you and Maryrose is to try and get Mike Mayock from the NFL Network here. I respect his opinion a lot more on if a player can play rather than Mel Kiper or Todd McShay. I’d be interested to know his thoughts on the Steelers.
Maryrose, you brought up an excellent question about McFadden. I do wish the team would have kept McFadden. You don’t have to worry about drafting a corner high if you resign him and it’s not like he received the going rate contract for a starting corner. That is one that could come back and bite the team. Good corners that you’ve already won 2 Super Bowls with and still have upside don’t grow on trees.
And the steelers only getting a 5th for Faneca instead of the 3rd everyone expected is just ridiculous. An All-Pro guy leaves your team, becomes the highest paid guard in NFL history, starts 16 games, and makes the Pro Bowl again and all you get is a 5th round pick? I don’t understand that one.
by datruth4life on Mar 24, 2009 11:47 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
yea me neither
Ive kind of not spent one second looking at the logistics of that but really makes no sense. Is it not ‘automated’ for lack of a better word? Is there no chart? Like shitty coaches have for 2 point coversion decisions?
by Blitzburgh on Mar 24, 2009 11:50 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I’m starting to think MeMo played into this somehow. While other FA’s signed elsewhere last year (like Haggans), none of of them contributed anywhere near as much as Moore did for us. Maybe Faneca – Moore = a 5th rounder?
charity standing orders
by BadMaafala on Mar 24, 2009 12:22 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
hagans was playing a lot until he was injured in like week 10 or 11
I'll drink your Milkshake, I'll drink it up!
by drinkyourmilkshake on Mar 24, 2009 12:31 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah, but Moore contributed 180 touches, 900+ APY, and 6 TD’s, verses 18 tackles and a sack for Haggans. Moore’s production may have affected the comp pick we got.
charity standing orders
by BadMaafala on Mar 24, 2009 2:52 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Oh, and Plainview, if you’re still looking for your six packs, there’s an interesting article at Steeler Fury breaking down Kemo’s contract. I’m not sure the numbers add up correctly, but still, it might be pretty easy to cut him after a year or two unless he develops.
http://steelerfury.com/content/breaking-down-kemoeatu-contract
charity standing orders
by BadMaafala on Mar 24, 2009 3:34 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
thats for the tip bad
I'll drink your Milkshake, I'll drink it up!
by drinkyourmilkshake on Mar 24, 2009 4:17 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
cheers
this is what my first reaction to the contract was, so I likey heh
by tkired on Mar 25, 2009 3:51 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah, I’m not sure they did the SB numbers right. The first numbers I heard was that $6M was guaranteed instead of roughly $3.8M. Also, if you add up everything, the total is $18M something instead of the $20M reported.
charity standing orders
by BadMaafala on Mar 25, 2009 11:05 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I agree Mayock is my favorite for draft information
I'll drink your Milkshake, I'll drink it up!
by drinkyourmilkshake on Mar 24, 2009 11:54 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Misunderstood the ramifications of the McFadden poison pill
A past tactic to deal with getting McFadden under the cap would have to renegoiate some of the bigger stars, essentially moving salary from a current and future year in the contract into a bonus that then gets amortized over the life of the contract.
Without knowing much about the uncapped year, isn’t it true that renegotiations are nearly non-existent? And at a high-level, isn’t it because players and their agents don’t want contracts ending say in 2010 with decreased salaries? Which would then limit them significantly in an uncapped year?
I didn’t think it had to do with cash flow, per se.
by Steeler DB on Mar 24, 2009 12:22 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
the steelers in particular might be having cash flow issues
with the change in ownership that is occurring and seems to be taking longer than originally thought.
I'll drink your Milkshake, I'll drink it up!
by drinkyourmilkshake on Mar 24, 2009 12:33 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Harrison
From what I understand, we’re right up against the cap number, which makes it extremely difficult to negotiate the long-term deal Harrison [and presumably the Steelers] wants. It may have to wait until the end of next season, which is something the Steelers are seemingly loathe to do, but at that point, they may take some money freed up from other expiring contracts (I agree with Wexell, FWP’s last year as a Steeler is next season) to give to Harrison. Short of that, they can franchise him at the end of ’09, and work it out then.
by JudeCooper on Mar 24, 2009 12:46 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
If cash is king
you would hope that in the short term, there would be more money coming in since the new investors have to buy in with cash. so maybe the Harrison deal gets done but not right quite yet.
by Steeler DB on Mar 24, 2009 1:05 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
thanks for the interview
Solid questions, great answers.
It’s what I expect from this site.
by vherub on Mar 24, 2009 4:11 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
thanks man
More soon as we wait for the draft, looking like from a player next.
by Blitzburgh on Mar 24, 2009 5:15 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
reference explaination, please
I’m new here, and I just saw Harrison referred to as Deebo. I don’t get it. What’s the connection?
by Auggie's dad on Mar 24, 2009 5:58 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Deebo = a pop culture reference to the bully in the movie Friday
Not exactly the greatest piece of American cinematography, but huge appeal among younger people between ages like 21-35. Deebo from the movie even has his own wikipedia page :)
by Blitzburgh on Mar 24, 2009 6:23 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
How many times do you think someone has edited that page to replace it with #92 propaganda?
Don't worry about the haters. Haters only hate.
by steelguy99 on Mar 24, 2009 7:16 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
that's great
After a lengthy fist fight, however, Deebo gets “knocked the f*** out” by Craig (as quoted by Smokey).
charity standing orders
by BadMaafala on Mar 25, 2009 11:08 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Great interview Blitz!
Two highlights for me:
1. Apparently Wexell shares our frustration with the kick return situation. I laughed my tuchas off reading this line:
let’s maake it real funny and use Darnell Stapleton to return kicks this year. What would be the difference at this point?
2. This is one of the most important insights I’ve read about the Steeler’s organization since I started reading the site.
the Steelers, whose biggest draft-day measurement is a prospect’s passion for the game. That work ethic got James Farrior a nice contract for his old age last year. It means a lot to them in their negotiations with Harrison this year.
We don’t go after the best talent. Character isn’t measured for us by good grades and community service. We like guys who eat, drink and breath the game. Deebo, Potsie, FWP, Ward – makes for an interesting team.
by SteelerBuddha on Mar 25, 2009 8:49 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Well done Blitz
Great questions and very good insight from Mr. Wexell. I got his book about former Steelers players “Men of Steel” I think it’s called. Good read. I wil be sure to pick up the paperback of Steeler Nation. Keep up th great work, it is very much appreciated.
"Whaddya' mean all the beer is gone..?
by OhioYinzer on Mar 25, 2009 9:32 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs

by 





















