Surveying The AFC North - The Quarterbacks
A new series here on BTSC as we continue to trudge through the long season in anticipation of a shot at defending in 2009. The premise? A look at the significant positions on each team in the AFC North. Let's start with arguably the most important one of them all - the QBs.
Pittsburgh Steelers
Depth Chart - Ben Roethlisberger, Dennis Dixon. Byron Leftwich or Charlie Batch could be added soon enough.
Analysis - No need to rehash what the Steelers have in their franchise QB Ben Roethlisberger. Nobody would point to him as the prototypical example of how to play the position efficiently and consistently, but there's one thing he sure does with regularity - win, and in particular, in the clutch. Big Ben has I believe 26 come from behind victories at the tender age of 25 years old, the most in the league since he was drafted in 2004. Ben has two Super Bowls already and has a great shot at going down as one of the all-time legends of the game at his position if he can win a few more while minimizing some of his mistakes. The interesting thing to keep an eye on with Ben over the coming years is whether or not he'll be able to sustain the same level of big-moment magic as he potentially adjusts towards a style of play that minimizes his exposure to the battering he presently takes holding on to the ball while trying to make things happen for his offense.
Career Record: 51-20
2008 Stats:281-469 (59.9%), 3301 yards, 17 TDs, 15 INTs, 80.1 QB Rating
Career Stats: 1189-1905 (62.2%), 14,974 yards, 101 TDs, 69 INTs, 89.4 QB Rating
Cincinnati Bengals
Depth Chart: Carson Palmer, J.T. O'Sullivan, Jordan Palmer
Analysis: Carson Palmer claims to be fully healed from the ligament damange he had in his throwing elbow, an injury that kept him out of 12 of his team's 16 games last year. If the Bengals are going to build upon some decent defensive improvements and vault back to relative relevance, they'll have to do so with Palmer at the controls. Behind him there's not much there. Out is Harvard product Ryan Fitzpatrick, but in his place rests J.T. O'Sullivan, a dude who couldn't keep a job over Shaun Hill in San Francisco.
Career Record: 32-33
2008 Stats: 75-129 (58.1%), 731 yards, 3 TDs, 4 INTs, 69.0 QB Rating
Career Stats: 1380-2165 (63.7%), 15,630 yards, 107 TDs, 67 INTs, 88.9 QB Rating
Baltimore Ravens
Depth Chart: Joe Flacco, Troy Smith
Analysis: First, let me start by saying that I love that the Ravens just keep two QBs on the 53-man depth chart. It's one of the many reasons that they're a fairly complete football team most years on defense, special teams and offense, 2008 included. Moving on, another hat tip to rookie Joe Flacco for his fine rookie performance. Leading one's team to the AFC title game is nothing to sneeze at. It should be said that as is often the case with traditional media, the 'narrative' surrounding Flacco didn't quite align perfectly with his actualy performance. He was good, no doubt. But if you listened to AFC commentators on CBS each week, one might get the impression that they were watching the second coming of Joe Montana right before their eyes. Hold the phone. Flacco was very good for a rookie, particularly one that played his college ball at a no-name football program like Deleware. However, Flacco hardly carried his Ravens team during year one. Not that there's anything wrong with that of course. But it should be noted that like Big Ben, Flacco struggled when he was asked to sling it frequently. In games in which he had 30+ attempts, the Ravens were 0-3 and Flacco had just 2 TDs to 5 INTs. It's fairly obvious that he's going to have somewhere between a just fine and fantastic NFL career - far better and more fleshed out than say a J.P Lohsman and perhaps even a Derek Anderson. But it's far too early to annoint him the steady and game-influencing type quarterback that's going to consistently deliver in big moments for the Ravens in future years. I'm extremely excited to see what the former Blue Hen has in store for an encore after a most impressive rookie campaign.
Career Record: 11-5
2008 Stats: 257-428 (60.0%), 2971 yards, 14 TDs, 12 INTs, 80.3 QB Rating
Career Stats: Same. Rookie in 2008.
Cleveland Browns
Depth Chart: Brady Quinn, Derek Anderson, Richard Bartel
Analysis: Who does new coach Eric Mangini go with when the 2009 kicks off? Will it be the much scrutinized Brady Quinn, who showed a few flashes when he finally got his chance in 2008 before getting injured? Or will it be Derek Anderson, who followed up his break-out year in 2007 with a major clunker in 2008? Anderson and Quinn are both expected to be fully healthy and ready for training camp this summer. Anderson's dealing with a knee injury that shut down his season, while Quinn is recovering from a broken pinky. It's of course nice to have options at a position as vital as the QB spot, but neither candidate can really be thought of as a sure bet to perform consistently after winning the job this summer. When I wrote about the Browns last offseason, I thought it was a distinct possibility that former head coach Romeo Crennel's decision making for the long-term would be compromised by the thin ice his job was on. Turns out injuries forced his hand by mid-season but anyway, being that it's Mangini's first year, he should have a little leeway to make a decision and stick with it through some potential adjustment mishaps, be it with Anderson or with Quiinn at the helm. Then again, it is Eric Mangini, who I've seen bungle multiple games with absolutely mind blowing game management and decision making. And it's of course the National Football League, the ultimate what have you done for me lately league where there's really no such thing as building for the future. Another very interesting story line to keep an eye on in 2009 in the AFC North that could end up any number of ways.
0 recs |
70 comments
| Add comment
|
Comments
Flacco = Joe Montana?
As the Ravens blogger, I’ve never heard this comparison. However, always heard similar comments about Big Ben after his first season, and while he has played great and is one of the better QB’s as far as winning in the NFL, he is no Joe Montana either. Flacco basically did the exact same thing as Ben did in his first year. Got them to the AFC Championship Game (lost) but did so as a complementary player, not the star. Both teams stars were the defense and the reason they didn’t do well when they had to throw over 30 passes, is that both teams are and have alway been a run-first offense. Meaning that if they were throwing over 30 passes, they were usually losing and playing outside their game plans. Slam Joe any way you want, but you’re looking at a mirror image after one season with Ben. So who knows where we’ll go after this year. One thing I do know is that we’re going to have – AT LEAST – two more wars next season
Rexx
by Rexx on Apr 13, 2009 9:47 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Not quite a mirror
Ben didn’t lose a game his rookie year until the playoffs. Not saying he single handedly won them, but he had an amazing QB Rating above 95 if I recall correctly.
Not meant to be a knock on Joe who is a great QB for the Ravens system, but I don’t think it’s accurate to call his rookie year as good as Ben’s.
by Chicago Steeler on Apr 13, 2009 10:49 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Roethlisburger also had a better offensive unit.
The Ravens offensive weapons were average (at best) last year . Flacco didn’t have the weapons that Ben did. Hines Ward and Jerome Bettis were still in their prime, and Plaxico Burress was awesome too. Big possession receivers like Ward and Burress help a young quarterbacks more than anything. If Flacco had been in the Steelers system from 2004, I honestly believe that he would have posted an excellent QB rating too.
by BAL_Hawk on Apr 13, 2009 11:04 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Better unit?
The Steelers offense was rated 22nd (yardage) in the league in 2003 with those same weapons and Tommy Maddox at the helm.
by HoustonPA on Apr 13, 2009 11:09 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Sure… but the lack of production doesn’t mean anything in this argument. The point is that the Steelers had great receivers during Ben’s rookie season, and his numbers will look better as a result. In 2002, both Burress and Ward had over 1000 yards in receiving yardage. Burress went on to win a Superbowl. Furthermore, Ward was the Superbowl MVP in 2005. They ARE excellent recievers, and if Flacco had them last year, he would have posted a 95 QB rating too.
Flacco and Roethlisburger ARE comparable quarterbacks. Flacco has alot to prove, and Roethlisburger is proven. However, we couldn’t have asked for much more during Flacco’s rookie season, and I’d take Joe over Ben any day.
by BAL_Hawk on Apr 13, 2009 11:25 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Bettis in his prime in 2004, that’s laughable. The difference between 2004 and Bettis’ prime is astronomical. Bettis in his prime took Kordell to the AFC championship game.
Yes Ward was phenomenal that year and the 6’5 Plex batting down bad throws is a great thing for any rook’s confidence, look what that confidence did for Eli.
Ben and Joe’s rookie years can be called comparable, but QB’s aren’t made in their rookie year. The thing that makes Ben great is his drives when drives have to be made. Making plays when we need them with a crappy line and no run game whatsoever.
That’s not Joe, Joe has the potential to be great too, and since he’s on the Ravens he shouldn’t have the trouble Cleveland and Cinci QB’s have surviving the season. If the O-line is good again this year and Ravens add a reciever before age does in Mason there should be a good fight for the division the next couple of years.
by Phantaskippy on Apr 13, 2009 3:45 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
You guys would know more about Bettis. Well said… I totally agree.
by BAL_Hawk on Apr 13, 2009 6:45 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Coincidentally...
That’s the same exact ranking BAL had in 07…so I’m not sure I buy this argument.
by HoustonPA on Apr 13, 2009 11:13 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I don’t think anyone was trying to slam Flacco. I think the point was that no one could have predicted what Ben was going to do after his first year, therefore you also can’t do so with Flacco (no matter how promising he looked). Also, I think the comments referenced were made by CBS commentators, not Ravens fans. And to be fair, I seem to remember the same type of comments being made about Ben in his first playoffs. Something about rookies gets Simms all worked up.
Also, I don’t really think the stats compare between Ben and Flacco in their rookie seasons. I agree that they were both given a lighter, complimentary load. But Ben had a higher rating (18), TD/INT ratio, and YPA (2). Flacco did have more yards, but he also played more games. Don’t get me wrong, Flacco did have a very good rookie year, but let’s not say it was “basically the same thing” as Ben’s just because he made the AFC championship game.
by HoustonPA on Apr 13, 2009 10:50 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
yea
but ben’s passer rating was almost 20 points more his rookie season, while stats don’t tell the whole story they do show efficiency, Yea you can say flacco got the team to the championship game, they are both tall and big arm’d QBs, but they did not do the exact same thing. Ben’s numbers were way better and you can’t argue that. Althought yea ben wasn’t the start and was a complementary player. So if it is a mirror image, there are streaks left on the mirror. And I myself don’t mind cleaning that mirror up to you to show you that mirror is really one of the circus mirror in the cartoons that makes the fat ugly men looks like a body builder. Sorry I’ll defend Ben’s legacy until someone breaks his rookie record of best passer record of 98.1 – compared to flaccos pedestrians 80
by tannofsteel84 on Apr 13, 2009 10:50 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
When the hell did anyone say he was the next Joe Montana?
Don’t think I ever heard that once. I actually hard more people hating on him rather then saying he is the next Montana. Everyone hopped on the Flacco Wagon after the Titans game. Even though the stats may not show it, IMO Flacco had the most exciting passing performance for the Ravens since Testaverde.
Physically, Flacco is a better athlete then Ben and has a better arm. But Ben has this ugly way of winning big time games, something Joe showed a little glimpse of. Right now, I really do believe that Ben is the most elusive QB to ever play this game. I thought Mike Vick was hard to get on the ground, but for a big fatty like Rufflesburger to move like that is unreal.
And to anyone up here, numbers aint s*** unless you get the win. Ben and Joe did do the exact same thing their rookie years, quarterback their team to the AFC Championship game.
You have to hate losing more than you love winning.
by Mr MaLoR on Apr 13, 2009 10:55 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Huh?
14-1 > 13-6
I know math is tough for those in Baltimore…maybe if we can find a way to convert wins into kilos, they might understand.
by HoustonPA on Apr 13, 2009 11:03 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Cliched use of the word "much" much.
Sorry to offend your delicate sensibilities…I’m sure Baltimore isn’t anything like how its described by everyone who has ever been there. Call a spade a spade dude. I live in Houston and wouldn’t take offense if someone said it’s dangerous here(because it is).
P.S. It’s a stereotype when you give everyone/everything in the same class the same characteristics. So what did I do there, attribute your Baltimore the same characteristics as all the other Baltimores?
by HoustonPA on Apr 13, 2009 11:24 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
FYI… I live in the Carolinas (maybe some redneck stereotypes will work). I’m not really following your logic… or grammar, but I’m just not very high on stereotypes. In my experience, unless they are used in theater, stereotypes are very often prejudiced, racist or at the very least, derogatory.
by BAL_Hawk on Apr 13, 2009 11:34 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I quite like baltimore as a city actually, but that’s just me.
Don't worry about the haters. Haters only hate.
by steelguy99 on Apr 13, 2009 11:34 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Crabcakes.....
You have to hate losing more than you love winning.
by Mr MaLoR on Apr 13, 2009 11:38 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Huh
Most people who visit Baltimore enjoy it and are surprised when it’s not like a scene from the Wire.
H
by DT711 on Apr 13, 2009 11:36 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Can we all please leave cities vs. cities out of this?
Don't worry about the haters. Haters only hate.
by steelguy99 on Apr 13, 2009 11:37 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
We try, but we all suffer from Detroit envy.
by Phantaskippy on Apr 13, 2009 3:48 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yea man
The pro bowl players must have been pretty excited to vacation there when the pro bowl was supposed to be hosted in Detroit.
“Hey, I am going to the pro bowl, YAYYYY. I cant wait. Where is it”
“Detroit in the middle of Febuary”
“God Damnit I hate being good at football”
You have to hate losing more than you love winning.
by Mr MaLoR on Apr 13, 2009 4:50 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
How far did each of them go their rookie year?
You have to hate losing more than you love winning.
by Mr MaLoR on Apr 13, 2009 11:12 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
read the sentence, then talk
But if you listened to AFC commentators on CBS each week, one might get the impression that they were watching the second coming of Joe Montana right before their eyes.
Don't worry about the haters. Haters only hate.
by steelguy99 on Apr 13, 2009 11:03 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Dierdorf was one of the worst offenders
many announcers are prone to hyperbole and talking guys up, but Dan is in his own world. Whether he is deciding he won’t call players rookies anymore, to having a scripted storyline he does not deviate from independent of actual play on the field, the accolades are out of control.
by vherub on Apr 13, 2009 11:08 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Dierdorf, Kornheiser and Bryant Gumbel
Those 3 need to be taken out of sport commentary.
You have to hate losing more than you love winning.
by Mr MaLoR on Apr 13, 2009 11:14 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
To Rexx from Steelers Nation:
Hey Rexx, do me a favor and ask Willis McGahee how many fingers are we holding up here at BTSC? I think it is six, and it’ll be seven after next year.
And next season, tell your players to keep their head on a swivel. It takes too much time from the game to have to take a television timeout and get a stretcher on the field every time one of your players get knocked the F-out by us, which happens quite often (especially by our WRs).
Here we go Steelers, Here we go!
by datruth4life on Apr 13, 2009 11:32 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Sure, we'll do that...
Just do us a quick favor too. Ask Mendenhall how his shoulder is doing… I’m sorry, but you guys really can’t talk. McGahee only received a concussion. Mendehall was out for the year with a broken bone.
By the way, that hit on McGahee will be illegal next year. Ray’s hit on Mendenhall was clean.
by BAL_Hawk on Apr 13, 2009 11:43 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
we won the superbowl
you only made it to the AFC championship game.
so in fact I think we can talk.
I'll drink your Milkshake, I'll drink it up!
by drinkyourmilkshake on Apr 13, 2009 11:50 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
You could probably even go so far as saying that Sweeds hit basically locked the AFCC game up. You need CBs to cover WRs.
On the flipside, Baltimore could have easily laid the claim to costing us the SB after Ward got some payback. Thankfully we have other guys that can catch.
Don't worry about the haters. Haters only hate.
by steelguy99 on Apr 13, 2009 11:53 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
You can talk
Just dont type : )
You have to hate losing more than you love winning.
by Mr MaLoR on Apr 13, 2009 12:01 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I don’t know that I’d brag about rules being changed because the steelers WRs have developed a talent for knocking teams the F out, but your point is taken.
Don't worry about the haters. Haters only hate.
by steelguy99 on Apr 13, 2009 11:51 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Go ahead and brag on Hines, We should Brag on Mel Blount and Jack Lambert for the protection Offensive players get, and on Hines for the protection Defenders are getting.
That’s how the Steelers play. That’s how the Ravens play too. Pity the poor QB’s in Cincy and Cleveland. They are the ones who suffer.
Peyton was whining about playing the Ravens and Jets (now with Rex Ryan) in the same year. Pansy ought to try playing in the AFC North. His career might not be so great.
by Phantaskippy on Apr 13, 2009 3:54 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Nice to see a classic pissing match
The old is my QB bigger than your QB, which is really an evolution of can my dad beat up your dad. Which is not to say that it isn’t fun in its own way.
Several points
Pittsburgh and Baltimore are both dying rust belt cities with a ton of problems and a ton of character. Let’s leave them be. They both have enough trouble as it is.
Flacco had a great rookie year. It was impressive that he lead his team to the AFC championship game.
Ben had a statistically better rookie year in almost every way, including the most significant category – wins. His 13 victories in a row to start his career are an amazing achievement and speak to his poise . He only lost one game his whole rookie year and that was to the Patriots in the AFC championship.
Ben won 6 games against teams with winning records: (Jets twice, Jacksonville, Baltimore, Philly, NWE)
Flacco lost 6 games in his rookie season, compared to one by Ben. But in all fairness 3 of those losses were to Steelers. Flacco won 5 games against teams with winning records (Miaimi twice, Tenn, Philadelphia, Dallas)
Ben recorded 3 4th quarter come from behind victories in his rookie season
Flacco had one (against the Browns)
Flacco was asked to do more his rookie season then Ben. He threw the ball 26.75 times a game during the regular season as opposed to Ben’s 21.07 in the regular season.
In 2004 the Steelers offense was ranked 11th in the league. It gained 5184 yards.
In 2008 the Ravens offense was ranked 11th in the league. It gained 5184 yards.
Neither of the above sentences is a typo. Both teams relied heavily on running finishing in the top 5 in the league.
Flacco’s rookie campaign was fantastic and if it wasn’t for a couple of game winning drives by Ben Roethlisberger he might have had a shot to play in the Super Bowl. If he is able to find a way to will his team to victory in a couple of those close games against the Steelers next year and win a Super Bowl then we can meet here again and compare their second seasons.
Until then….
by SteelerBuddha on Apr 13, 2009 12:23 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
In 2004 the Steelers offense was ranked 11th in the league. It gained 5184 yards.
In 2008 the Ravens offense was ranked 11th in the league. It gained 5184 yards.
Incredible.
My dad can beat up your dad, btw.
Don't worry about the haters. Haters only hate.
by steelguy99 on Apr 13, 2009 12:27 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Holy S***!
Guess the argument is over. Both offenses were exactly the same each year!
You have to hate losing more than you love winning.
by Mr MaLoR on Apr 13, 2009 12:29 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
But my dad beat up your mom.
I believe that’s the right come-back.
by Phantaskippy on Apr 13, 2009 3:55 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
The Bling Is The Thing!
Case closed. I move to adjourn. All in favor?
by datruth4life on Apr 13, 2009 12:40 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Flacco
First off, let me say that I really appreciate the fact that we get so many Baltimore fans on this website. Any informational site is going to benefit from other sources of info and differences in viewpoints, and the Raven’s fan supply both. The fact that they still come here despite being out-numbered and frequently abused is a testament to them. (I’d like to see more Browns and Bengals fans here also, but I understand if they’re too ashamed to show their faces).
Second, as a lifelong Steeler fan, who just barely caught the glory years of the 70’s (born in ‘71), I completely emphasize with cheering for a team that is consistently good and competative, but always lacking an elite quarterback to put the team over the top. It’s only natural to latch onto Flacco and convince oneself that he’ll be the difference maker – we Steeler fans have made a habit of clinging our hopes to some journeyman QB that later even fails to make it as a back-up elsewhere. Hell, speaking of myself, I thought Kordell Stewart could be our second coming.
I just don’t think Flacco’s that great. He might be your Neil O’Donnel: good, competent, but not a difference-maker. Fortunately, we have a whole host of games coming up in a few months that will help prove one of us right. I will be more than willing to admit that I was wrong (but I don’t think I’ll have to).
by The King in Yellow (and black) on Apr 13, 2009 12:42 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Good man
We will never back down from you guys, except on primetime of course! Browns fans have no argument. They are uneducated and still think they have the best fan base in the NFL. Their whole organization is poop and Eric Mangina is gonna do nothing to improve it.
I mean, they really thought they found a franchise QB in Derrick Anderson and gave Baltimore a bunch of crap for us cutting him from our PRACTICE SQUAD. Now I hope they can see why he was cut by us.
As for the Bungels, not much to say about them. Dont really hate them like I hate the Steelers or laugh at them like I laugh at the Browns. They are just the Bengals. I respect Marvin Lewis since he coached the greatest defense of all time (Yea I said it).
You have to hate losing more than you love winning.
by Mr MaLoR on Apr 13, 2009 1:27 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
YES SIR!
THE Greatest Defense Ever! With The Greatest MLB Ever!
by FEARtheTERP1 on Apr 13, 2009 1:43 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
And Flacco WILL be great.
You have to hate losing more than you love winning.
by Mr MaLoR on Apr 13, 2009 1:28 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I mean, Flacco shows some serious signs:
First of all, numbers aside, all the scouts agree that Flacco is blessed with rare physical talent. He has Roethlisberger’s size, and some of his speed, with discernably better arm strength and throw accuracy. The only question for a scout regarding such a specimen as Flacco is “can he handle the learning curve?”
I humbly submit to you the case that he can. He went, in one year’s time, from preparing to face Div. 1 AA Appalaichan State to preparing to face the Dallas Cowboys in the last game ever in Texas Stadium—a game in which he made some very good throws and was as responsible for the win as was LeRon McClain or Willis McGahee. Flacco has already shown some things that most rookies struggle with: he looks off safeties, audibles out of bad plays, and shows an ability to scan the whole field.
Flacco immediately arrived in Owings Mills, MD, and showed up to the practice facility in the wee hours of the morning to work out with Ray Lewis. He has done the same since the hearbreaking AFC Championship loss to the Steelers. Word on the street is that the guy is a total film rat who does nothing besides watch his own game tape and study his own flaws.
Let us also point out that while Flacco struggled against several of the league’s elite defenses, such as Tennessee, Pittsburgh, and New York, he completely dominated several mediocre defenses. He blew up for 200+ yards against Houston, 247 against Cleveland, and 297 against Jacksonville. He had very strong, efficient performances against Miami, twice, and against Oakland and Cincinatti, although he posted less gaudy numbers (actually he completely blew up Cincy in the last game but I won’t tout that too much since that was an especially poor defensive effort on their part). It seems as though the only step he has left to take is to learn how to play against the NFL’s elite defenses.
You Steelers fans make the point that its too early to “annoint” Flacco. Sure, let’s not annoint him—we annointed Boller a little too early and it didn’t play too well. But based on all you can know about a quarterback following a Rookie season, there aren’t many guys who can show you better stuff as a rookie or who can make better leaps and bounds with the Pro game’s learning curve than Flacco. There are maybe 5 QBs who ever had rookie seasons as good as Flacco’s, and considering that the only defense that seemed to totally overwhelm him in the second half of the season was Pittsburgh’s, I’m about as confident as you can be for a mere second-year QB. I think I agree with what the Pitt blogger said; that he’s almost sure to have a career that is between “fine and fabulous.” I’m just leaning a little closer to fabulous than he is, I think.
by jackmca on Apr 13, 2009 2:59 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think Flacco will be debated until he gives the TV heads some definite strengths and weaknesses, instead of just being really solid across the board. Nobody at ESPN likes that.
Ben has found his niche as the gambler QB who is deadly on a big drive. So now they love him. I would love to see Joe be a great all around QB, win games and frustrate the TV guys.
Although then he’ll get tagged as a “Game Manager” who only wins cause his teams good. Unlike other QB’s who win when their team stinks.
I’m still working on compiling a list of QB’s that won when their team stunk. I’ll get back to you on it.
by Phantaskippy on Apr 13, 2009 4:01 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I feel ya guys.
And I can respect what you say. You know how us Ravens fans are getting, we havent had a set QB lead this team anywhere. We were between Tony Banks and Trent Dilfer when we won it all in 2000. This team has been through the worst in the league when it comes to QB, so you cannot hate on us for getting excited about a guy who led us to the AFCC.
I mean, Joe does not even have a 300 yard performance or 3 TD game yet! I think once he can start getting those type of games, he will get his credit. Just gotta add someone dangerous to catch the ball.
You have to hate losing more than you love winning.
by Mr MaLoR on Apr 13, 2009 4:53 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
You have dangerous receivers, but they all play D.
Don't worry about the haters. Haters only hate.
by steelguy99 on Apr 13, 2009 5:00 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Great point
Its funny that Reed gets his hands on 11 balls this season and gets 4 touchdowns and there are WR’s in the league who get 60-70 catches a year and only get 3 TD’s
Cinci: Ocho Cinco
Clev: Edwards
Pitt: Holmes
BAL: ……….
We need that guy.
You have to hate losing more than you love winning.
by Mr MaLoR on Apr 13, 2009 5:13 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Idea!
Flacco proved he can catch, why not put him as a receiver?
This is Pittsburgh Steeler Troy Polamalu getting knocked around by the Pacific Ocean in Hawaii yesterday...
Minutes later, Troy caught the ocean going over the middle and smacked it right in the mouth. The ocean fumbled, Troy recovered and ran it into the endzone. The ocean never messed with Troy again.
by paulamalu on Apr 14, 2009 2:49 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
The Pastrami went bad.......
You have to hate losing more than you love winning.
by Mr MaLoR on Apr 14, 2009 8:33 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Hamburger-day?
Oops, I mean.. Heyward-Bey?
This is Pittsburgh Steeler Troy Polamalu getting knocked around by the Pacific Ocean in Hawaii yesterday...
Minutes later, Troy caught the ocean going over the middle and smacked it right in the mouth. The ocean fumbled, Troy recovered and ran it into the endzone. The ocean never messed with Troy again.
by paulamalu on Apr 14, 2009 8:50 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
You are a grasshole
What do you like on your Rufflesburger? HEINZ ward
HAHAHHA
You have to hate losing more than you love winning.
by Mr MaLoR on Apr 14, 2009 9:10 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Lame
Hey maybe next season you can drive in your Carr to watch us play in the super bowl, along with the Heap of dung that has manifested itself in Joe the Crow’s unibrow, and then when Ray Lewis craps his pants at how good we’ve become you can take his clothes and put them in the Landry with all the other dirty rags.
Bam! TOTAL ownage… top that MaLoR.
This is Pittsburgh Steeler Troy Polamalu getting knocked around by the Pacific Ocean in Hawaii yesterday...
Minutes later, Troy caught the ocean going over the middle and smacked it right in the mouth. The ocean fumbled, Troy recovered and ran it into the endzone. The ocean never messed with Troy again.
by paulamalu on Apr 15, 2009 1:49 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
White flag
You have to hate losing more than you love winning.
by Mr MaLoR on Apr 15, 2009 3:31 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
What, precisely, does Flacco do well?
Yeah, sure, he wins. That’s enough, but I’m hoping to get beyond that. All I’ve heard that is brag worthy is his long ball (sorta reminds me of Rex Grossman) and, of course, his eyebrow. What else does he do that truly stands apart from other top QBs in the league?
by Varmint on Apr 13, 2009 1:38 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
"he wins"
i dont know what team you watch but all steeler fans respond to criticism about your boy berger is “he wins football games!” So you are asking the same question that Steeler fans have been harrassed with for years! Where have you been?
by FEARtheTERP1 on Apr 13, 2009 1:46 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yes, but Ben has shown that trait for 5 years now. We could claim D.A. just won games when the Browns won 10 games with him in 2007.
All I’m saying is that if we’re doing pure comparisons Ben’s first year was statistically better than Uni-Brow’s and if it’s based on who will be the better QB over time there’s very few arguments for uni-brow at this point. If he somehow wins 2 super bowls in his first 5 years we’ll talk further.
by Chicago Steeler on Apr 13, 2009 2:06 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
a few things...
-He stands in the pocket and keeps his eyes downfield, which is often a challenge for many nervous rookies but never was a problem for Flacco…-the question as a rookie was whether or not he could find them. In some games he did, in othes he didn’t…
—He scans the whole field and looks off safeties, which few rookies do well…
—He places balls into very small holes with excellent revolutions on the ball. This goes back to his arm stregnth, but it has more to do with his game than just having a long ball. He can find small spaces with accuracy
—He has a very technically sound throwing motion with a pretty quick release, giving him the ability to make throws as quickly as he makes the decisions to throw them. His size plays into this as well since he will be less likely to have these last-minute throws batted-down by defensive linemen.
—He has shown a superb ability to understand plays and schemes with short time periods to learn them.
—He has a superb work ethic and great mental toughness, which probably had a lot to do with his ability to quickly learn our system.
on the NEGATIVES:
—He DOES NOT yet feel the rush very well, sometimes feeling pressure that isn’t there or missing pressure that is…
—He DOES NOT always accurately judge how quickly some defensive backs can close gaps or how long receivers who ARE open will STAY open for.
In my opinion, there are no uncurable negatives to Flacco so far. He bascially shows that he has all the tools he needs, he just needs to perfect his trade.
by jackmca on Apr 13, 2009 3:09 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Exactly, and I think he can learn all that stuff from one guy
Big Ben. No one can feel the rush like Ben can. His footwork is beyond belief for someone his size and he can do it all. Only thing I disagree with you here is the last part you crossed out. Joe made some very nice throws in tight places nearly every game. I can recall 10-12 times where the announcers were drooling over the fact that Joe threaded a needle pass like that.
But, he did indeed try to make those throws too much, IE against Pitt. Good points though. I am sure he is working on all these now, as I have heard that he lives at our team complex these days.
You have to hate losing more than you love winning.
by Mr MaLoR on Apr 13, 2009 4:57 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
i didnt mean to cross anything out
nor do i know why anything got crossed out… can we edit that?? i meant everything I said.
by jackmca on Apr 13, 2009 7:40 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
jackmca's comment sans stirkethru!
not sure what happened but for visual clarity, here’s what he wrote :)
-He stands in the pocket and keeps his eyes downfield, which is often a challenge for many nervous rookies but never was a problem for Flacco…
—He scans the whole field and looks off safeties, which few rookies do well…
—He places balls into very small holes with excellent revolutions on the ball. This goes back to his arm stregnth, but it has more to do with his game than just having a long ball. He can find small spaces with accuracy-the question as a rookie was whether or not he could find them. In some games he did, in othes he didn’t…
—He has a very technically sound throwing motion with a pretty quick release, giving him the ability to make throws as quickly as he makes the decisions to throw them. His size plays into this as well since he will be less likely to have these last-minute throws batted-down by defensive linemen.
—He has shown a superb ability to understand plays and schemes with short time periods to learn them.
—He has a superb work ethic and great mental toughness, which probably had a lot to do with his ability to quickly learn our system.
on the NEGATIVES:
—He DOES NOT yet feel the rush very well, sometimes feeling pressure that isn’t there or missing pressure that is…
—He DOES NOT always accurately judge how quickly some defensive backs can close gaps or how long receivers who ARE open will STAY open for.
In my opinion, there are no uncurable negatives to Flacco so far. He bascially shows that he has all the tools he needs, he just needs to perfect his trade.
by Blitzburgh on Apr 14, 2009 3:48 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Thanks
This is the sort of reply I was looking for. I’ll look for these traits next season.
Flacco deserves to be where he is, but I gotta see more evidence before I make any kind of assessment. I don’t take ratings from the announcer’s droolometer too seriously. Their job is to create drama.
by Varmint on Apr 14, 2009 1:31 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
yeah i agree
I’m not asking anybody to anoint Flacco, but as far as what a rookie can show you, you’d be pretty spoiled to ask more from a Rookie than Flacco gave us. But I will say this. Before his rookie season, people out in Owings Mills, MD were very impressed by how early he showed up and how willing he seemed to be to completely dedicate himself to this game. What the word is this offseason is that Flacco has practically incarcerated himself in the film room to study his own flaws as a QB.
So while I agree that it is too early to “anoint” him, I my personal droolometer is somewhere around the “rabies” rating on Flacco. This kid could really explode next year.
by jackmca on Apr 14, 2009 5:22 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
also to clarify...
I shouldn’t say that Flacco’s throwing motion is completely textbook, as his body motions seem kindof awkward at times, but his elbow level and his release point—the two most important factors in a throwing motion—are nice and high, which is where you want them to be. That’s the knock on short QBs and sidearm QBs—the ball comes out low and people bat it down or swat it into lame duck mode.
Also, on Flacco’s negatives, he did seem to inexplicably miss a few throws that he should have been able to make, from time to time. I’m guessing he just got nervous and freaked out a bit, since some of these key “brain farts” as I call them happened against Pitt and Tenn, who were easily the two toughest defenses he played against.
by jackmca on Apr 14, 2009 5:30 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs

by 


















