Behind the Steel Curtain: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
Around SBN: SB Nation NFL Power Rankings for Week 11

Surveying The AFC North - The Running Backs

Let's continue with our tour of the AFC North by each team's strength at each position. We began with the division's QBs, which can be found here. Let's move on to the the RBs.

 

Pittsburgh Steelers

Depth Chart - Willie Parker, Rashard Mendenhall, Mewelde Moore, Gary Russell,   Justin Vincent, Stefan Logan, Cary Davis (FB), Ryan Powdrell (FB)

2008 Team Rushing Statistics - 460 attempts (9th in NFL), 1689 yards (23rd) , 3.7 yards/attempt (29th), 105.6 yards per game, 16 TDs (11th)

2008 Individual Statistics


Rushing Receiving
G Rush Yds Y/G Avg Lng TD Rec Yds Y/G Avg Lng TD
2008 - Willie Parker 11 210 791 71.9 3.8 34 5 3 13 1.2 4.3 5 0


Rushing Receiving
G Rush Yds Y/G Avg Lng TD Rec Yds Y/G Avg Lng TD
2008 - Rashard Mendenhall 4 19 58 14.5 3.1 12 0 2 17 4.3 8.5 11 0


Rushing Receiving
G Rush Yds Y/G Avg Lng TD Rec Yds Y/G Avg Lng TD
2008 - Mewelde Moore 17 140 588 34.6 4.2 32 5 40 320 18.8 8 25 1


Rushing Receiving
G Rush Yds Y/G Avg Lng TD Rec Yds Y/G Avg Lng TD
2008 - Gary Russell 13 28 77 5.9 2.8 15 3 1 -2 -0.2 -2 -2 0


 

Baltimore Ravens

 

Star-divide

Depth Chart - Willis McGahee, Ray Rice, LeRon McCalin (FB/R), Jalen Parmele, Matt Lawrence

2008 Team Rushing Statistics - 592 attempts (1stt), 2376 yards (4th), 4.0 yards per attempt (25th), 148.5 yards per game, 20 TDs (7th)

2008 Individual Statistics


Rushing Receiving
G Rush Yds Y/G Avg Lng TD Rec Yds Y/G Avg Lng TD
2008 - Willis McGahee 13 170 671 51.6 3.9 77 7 24 173 13.3 7.2 35 0


Rushing Receiving
G Rush Yds Y/G Avg Lng TD Rec Yds Y/G Avg Lng TD
2008 - Ray Rice 12 107 454 37.8 4.2 60 0 33 273 22.8 8.3 40 0


Rushing Receiving
G Rush Yds Y/G Avg Lng TD Rec Yds Y/G Avg Lng TD
2008 - LeRon McClain 16 232 902 56.4 3.9 82 10 19 123 7.7 6.5 25

1




Cincinnati Bengals

Depth Chart - Cedric Benson, Gary Russell, Kenny Watson, DeDe Dorsey, James Johnson

2008 Team Statistics: 420 attempts (21st), 1520 yards (29th), 3.6 yards per carry (30th), 95 yards per game, 6 TDs (32nd)

2008 Individual Statistics:


Rushing Receiving
G Rush Yds Y/G Avg Lng TD Rec Yds Y/G Avg Lng TD
2008 - Cedric Benson 12 214 747 62.3 3.5 46 2 20 185 15.4 9.3 79 0


Rushing Receiving
G Rush Yds Y/G Avg Lng TD Rec Yds Y/G Avg Lng TD
2008 - Chris Perry 11 104 269 24.5 2.6 25 2 20 71 6.5 3.5 12 0


Rushing Receiving
G Rush Yds Y/G Avg Lng TD Rec Yds Y/G Avg Lng TD
2008 - Kenny Watson 9 13 55 6.1 4.2 7 0 3 4 .400 1.3 3 0


 

Cleveland Browns

Depth Chart: Jamaal Lewis, Jerome Harrison, Lawrence Vickers, Patrick Allen, Charles Ali

2008 Team Statistics: 409 attempts (24th), 1605 yards (26th), 3.9 yards per attempt (26th), 100.3 yards per game, 6 TDs (32nd)

2008 Individual Statistics:


Rushing Receiving
G Rush Yds Y/G Avg Lng TD Rec Yds Y/G Avg Lng TD
2008 - Jamal Lewis 16 279 1002 62.6 3.6 29 4 23 178 11.1 7.7 18 0


Rushing Receiving
G Rush Yds Y/G Avg Lng TD Rec Yds Y/G Avg Lng TD
2008 - Jerome Harrison 15 34 246 16.4 7.2 72 1 12 116 7.7 9.7 23 1


Rushing Receiving
G Rush Yds Y/G Avg Lng TD Rec Yds Y/G Avg Lng TD
2008 - Lawrence Vickers 11 10 31 2.8 3.1 10 0 10 78 7.1 7.8 21 0

 

 

Analysis and Ranking of AFC North Running Games

 

Blitz's Rankings:

  1. Baltimore Ravens
  2. Pittsburgh Steelers
  3. Cleveland Browns
  4. Cincinnati Bengals

Explanation and Analysis

First, a word on those things being considered in assessing the division's best running games. Most notably, it should be noted up front that the respective offensive lines are not being considered. We will break down the OLs of each team in future weeks, but for now we're just considering personnel and the offensive 'identities' of the four AFC North teams.

Baltimore - Putting Baltimore as the top ranked running game heading into the 2009 season seems perfectly reasonable to me, but there are a couple of important variables that could swing things in another team's favor as the season progresses. As it is every year, health and injuries will be of paramount importance for Baltimore and their running game.  The last time that Willis McGahee was on the field, he was being carted off after a vicious hit from Steelers S Ryan Clark. McGahee is a warrior no doubt - he's returned from serious surgery already in his career. At 28 years of age, McGahee's window is closing to truly be an elite, every down type of back.

Fortunately for him and the Ravens offense, he doesn't have to be. In the stable for Baltimore is also bruising RB/FB LeRon McClain and 2nd year back Ray Rice. Both flashed signs of brilliance last year and I'd suspect all three will be deployed to some extent by offensive coordinator Cam Cameron.

That brings me to my final point though about Baltimore and their offense heading into year two of the Joe Flacco era - how, if at all, will Cameron change his general approach to handling Flacco's maturity and progress. Remember, in his first year, the Ravens led the league in rush attempts despite not being particularly efficient doing so. To his credit though, the Ravens stuck with the ground game, the logic of course being minimizing the burden needing to be carried by Flacco and letting the Ravens perennially solid defense keep ball games close.

What will happen this year? Will Cameron be similarly cautious? Or will he open things up for Flacco and the passing game so, feeling he's more than ready to handle additional responsibilities with the play book and game plan? Obviously he is more equipped to handle more situations, but my theory is that too often coordinators take the shackles of young QBs too early if they were starters in year 1. It's not that Cameron needs to keep the training wheels on Flacco all year - there will be situations and matchups worth exploiting - but I generally contend that if Cameron decides to be more aggressive this coming year (generally speaking), than the Ravens could be in for a longer season than most imagine.

 

Pittsburgh - Obviously the play of the offensive line will go a long ways towards determining what kind of year Pittsburgh will have rushing the football. Pittsburgh didn't quite shake the moniker of being known as a smash-mouth physical run oriented team last year despite being bottom of the barrel rushing the ball. But for those of us who actually followed the team, it was obvious that the Steelers offense was far from physical and far from consistently effective pounding the rock.

Part of that was weak offensive line play, part was head scratching play calling, part was bad luck injury wise to FWP and Rashard Mendenhall, and perhaps part was even what I was alluding to with Flacco and Cameron in the previous paragraphs - that is, part of Pittsburgh's troubles running could have simply been the product of Bruce Arians putting more responsibility and trust in his 100+ million dollar QB than was arguably prudent.

Anyway, this should be an interesting year for Pittsburgh's rushing attack. Mendy is on schedule to return 100% healthy and (hopefully) with a chip on his shoulder, FWP is in a make-or-break year of sorts for his future financial situation, and Mewelde Moore will I'd imagine be there to fill in the gaps and as an emergency option if necessary. 

We'll see if Pittsburgh addresses the position in this year's draft at some point, and if the OL they presumably are eying will be able to have an impact in 2009. We'll see one more time if it was foolish to count out Willie Parker, and we'll discover if Kevin Colbert and his staff were wise in their selection of Mendenhall in last year's first round. An interesting year indeed in this department.

 

Cleveland - This is running long but Cleveland should be considered a sleeper of sorts in 2009 after just an abysmal 2008. It's hard to clearly label the Browns rushing attack as putrid last year because they simply found themselves behind in so many games. That's on their defense more than anything. The Browns OL is actually becoming a strong suit for them and if they can just keep themselves in more games and get better play out of the QB position, Jamal Lewis and the Browns rushing attack should be better in 2009.

There are however a lot of miles on the odometer for Lewis. His backup, Jerome Harrison, is a pretty good football player, but depth is a concern for Cleveland at the position and they may very well look to upgrade their via the draft at some point on either Day 1 or Day 2.

 

Cincinnati - The big news of last week in Pittsburgh and the division was the release of Gary Russell by the Steelers. He was picked up shortly thereafter by the Bengals. In 2008, the Bengals got a steal of a deal when they picked up Cedric Benson. The Bengals offense had to contend with similar issues that Cleveland did - that being they found themselves trailing in most weeks. Not to mention, the Bengals had Ryan Fitzpatrick at QB, which gave opposing defense next to no reason to fear the passing game, despite the two top flight WRs on the Bengals roster.

Can Benson follow it up in 2009? Various reports have Bengals players citing his excellent attitude and work ethic. I personally don't think it was fair how he was written off as a thug and prima donna in the first place. So he wasn't the greatest teammate at age 22 and had a run in with the law while drinking with friends on his boat. Does that make you unsalvagable as a character guy or person? Not in my book. If Carson Palmer is able to play a full season, I wouldn't at all be surprised to see Benson continue his upward trajectory as he hits the peak years of his physical prime, not to mention the years when he's got the most at stake for his financial future.

0 recs  |  Comment 17 comments  |  Add comment |

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

It’s interesting that cam cameron always seemed to dial-up a ho-hum gameplan for Pittsburgh. The ravens did use the run quite a bit this year, but against many other teams Flacco was entrusted a lot more than he was against the pittsburgh steelers. Common wisdom has believes that Joe wasn’t allowed to do much against the steelers, but in reality the only time he threw more than against Pittsburgh was against the colts.

An easy reason to pin on this is our defense of course, which made 3 yards difficult to come by on the ground. Of course, I believe it was the 2nd game last year where the ravens were having a lot of ground success but mysteriously Cam switched up to use Joe’s arm, and we know how that ended up.

Ravens fans would be able to comment better on this, but I believe that despite the amount of attempts Unijoe had against the steelers, it was the type of attempts that truly displayed the tight leash around him. While again, our defense has something to do with this (good coverage, etc), you could see Joe looking for shorter passes against the steelers than against other opponents, especially in our last two games. Despite this he was left with less than 50% completion rates against the steelers in two games, and just slightly above it in the first.

I think at this point the steelers hold a psychological advantage over the boy wonder, but I expect Joe to be able to look further afield next year against the steelers. I’m a bit worried about that prospect, but no QB will be able to be comfortable in the pocket next year.

Don't worry about the haters. Haters only hate.

by steelguy99 on Apr 20, 2009 9:42 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

dont think you remember that 2nd regular season game that well

The Ravens were pounding the ball nicely with McClain, but abandoned it to throw intermediate and deep with Flacco waaaaay too often. Too much gambling and not enough sticking with what was working that day – just hammering away with McClain, who wasn’t really being stopped by our D for big chunks of the game. Thought he overthought himself that day and I can see him doing it again with the Ravens offense next year when they really should try to run that trio of backs as much and as diversely as possible.

by Blitzburgh on Apr 20, 2009 9:59 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

All games are remembered through the passing of time and hazy beer consumption. Fortunately I have the play-by-play. But, I think you are missing the sentence where I say Of course, I believe it was the 2nd game last year where the ravens were having a lot of ground success but mysteriously Cam switched up to use Joe’s arm, and we know how that ended up., probably because it’s entirely too early there.

1st series: Ineffective running and short pass by Joejob
2nd series: 6 plays, 6 runs, starts effectively but ends in punt
Cam switches things up
3rd series: Heave-the-ball Joe goes deep and then short, throwing an INT
4th series: Inc Deep, short run, 24 yard 1st down. Run, Run, short inc pass.
Can’t trust joe anymore, 1/6 so far
5th series: Mclain abuses our defense: 6 yds, 5 yds, 9 yds…
                    3:50 left in half, cam changes strategy to rely on Joe with our run D in shambles
                    inc pass, 3 yd run, inc pass, short pass with 17 yd YAC, inc pass, short
                    pass with 12 yd YAC, 2 yd run, short pass 9yd, inc pass, short pass, inc pass
                    field goal – series ends on joes arm with a timeout in hand
do it JOE!
6th series: 8 yd run, 3 yd run (give it to joe!), sacked, 5 yd run, inc pass
7th series: inc pass, 4 yd run, inc pass
8th series: 4 yd, 2 yd, inc pass
9th series: 2 yd, 6 yd, deep inc pass
10th series: 3 yd, 3 yd, inc pass
11th series: 3 yd, 19 yd deep pass, 10 yd run, 3 yd, deep inc, short 11 yd pass, 1 yd, 1 yd, sacked
it’s up to you joe
12th series: inc pass, 14 yd pass, 1 yd pass, INT

I think the 2nd through 5th series are particularly interesting. The second series ends in the run game failing, but it shows that the steelers D is vulnerable. The next series Cam goes to the pass. In the 5th series Mclain runs all over the steelers, and then Cam switches to mostly the pass.

I believe the second game was different than the others, but I don’t think Flacco was ever trusted with the game. He was given the reins when there was no other choice, but for the most part in the 2nd game he was given the opportunity to throw not because Cam was going to let him win the game, but because Cam thought it would be a good changeup from the run-game which was largely gaining good chunks of yardage.

Don't worry about the haters. Haters only hate.

by steelguy99 on Apr 20, 2009 10:30 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

whoa

settle down. i think we’re on the same page but there’s some inconsistency to these back to back sentences:

Of course, I believe it was the 2nd game last year where the ravens were having a lot of ground success but mysteriously Cam switched up to use Joe’s arm, and we know how that ended up.

Ravens fans would be able to comment better on this, but I believe that despite the amount of attempts Unijoe had against the steelers, it was the type of attempts that truly displayed the tight leash around him.

The main thing I took from your point was the comment -short passes. And I don’t recall a sizeable chunk of his attempts being short passes in that second. The play by play you posted doesn’t suggest that either.

by Blitzburgh on Apr 20, 2009 11:02 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Sorry if my tone came out wrong, it’s all jokes with me this morning. I certainly wouldn’t have bothered to go through the play-by-play if I didn’t want to relive another ravens defeat at the PS hands.

You’re right about the second game being an outlier though, and there’s really no such thing as an outlier in 3 games…I should probably say that in games 1 and 3 Joe had a tight leash, and in game 2 he was unleashed albeit I would say “not trusted”. Of course, to say that I’ll have to look at the play-by-play of games 1 and 3…

Game 1: 22 short passes, 10 long (numbers maybe not entirely accurate)
Game 3: 24, 9

Seems like Joe was chucking the ball deep a fair amount on all of the games. So it doesn’t seem like Joe ever had a tight leash when he was playing against the steelers. Not only did he have the most attempts against any team besides the colts, but approximately 1/3 of his passes were deep shots, which is plenty.

I swear it always felt like he was being held in check against the steelers, but the evidence doesn’t support that. Anyone else feel the same way? Maybe it just has to do with my hunch that the games weren’t placed in his hands the way they were with some other games. Hard to justify with the amount of passes he threw. A lot of QBs end up passing more when they are behind by a huge deficit as well, which was not the case in this rivalry last year.

With all of this as a build-up, I feel a little better about the games next week since I doubt Joe will be tossing the ball up anymore than he did last year. He may have more talent around him, but it does seem like he was allowed to deliver the ball in at varying times, in varying fashions in games 1, 2, and 3.

If Mr Malor is around, I’d love to hear his thoughts on the gameplan vs. pittsburgh.

Don't worry about the haters. Haters only hate.

by steelguy99 on Apr 20, 2009 11:24 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Er, games next year, not next week. Unless the ravens want a little exhibition grudge match, our scrubs against theirs.

Don't worry about the haters. Haters only hate.

by steelguy99 on Apr 20, 2009 11:25 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

It’s not that Cameron needs to keep the training wheels on Flacco all year – there will be situations and matchups worth exploiting – but I generally contend that if Cameron decides to be more aggressive this coming year (generally speaking), than the Ravens could be in for a longer season than most imagine.

Why is it that cameron chose to be more aggressive against the steelers than other teams? Is he insane? Did he feel that was the only way the ravens could possibly win?

Don't worry about the haters. Haters only hate.

by steelguy99 on Apr 20, 2009 11:27 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

not sure

Theres an intimidation factor taht goes along with playing league’s best defense and certainly going up against Steelers perennially stout rush defense. Think he maybe just overthought things a bit. Dunno, but this coming year interests me for these reasons.

by Blitzburgh on Apr 20, 2009 11:34 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Seems arians-esque.

Plan: Try to run the ball, will fail, so rely on Joe’s arm.
Execution (in game 2): Running ball almost at will. Hmmm, rely on Joe’s arm?

Don't worry about the haters. Haters only hate.

by steelguy99 on Apr 20, 2009 11:45 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Shoot away on what you want me to discuss.

Throw some questions at me for how we can/will/might attack your defense.

You have to hate losing more than you love winning.

by Mr MaLoR on Apr 20, 2009 7:21 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

over 900 all-purpose yards for MeMo

Last summer, everyone was talking about the ‘pony’ backfield with Mendenhall & Parker – personally, I’d love to see a set with Moore + Mendenhall + 3 WR. It would depend on Mendy’s blocking skills, but those two guys are both a threat to run and catch – I would think it would give opposing defenses fits…

by acrollet on Apr 20, 2009 5:48 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

I am here Steelguy, what you need from me?

You have to hate losing more than you love winning.

by Mr MaLoR on Apr 20, 2009 7:20 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Just wondering what you think of the gameplan vs. the steelers last year? I recall on beatdown that you guys generally thought that Joe was kept on a tight leash. Is that true? Do you think cam’s gameplan was sound?

Don't worry about the haters. Haters only hate.

by steelguy99 on Apr 21, 2009 9:22 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Not too sure about the tight leash stuff

I really would not call it a tight leash because of the fact that we did not want Joe to feel that he HAD to win every game by spreading the ball around the field constantly. We were able to have a top 5 rushing attack in the league last year and that allowed us to “unleash” Joe against many teams, accept you guys. And it worked most of the time. Look at the Titans game. We were able to pound the ball till we got to about the 50 yard line, then nailed Tenn with a bomb to Mason.

Now, if we did not have that 4th ranked rushing attack, I think you would have seen 5-10 more attempts a game from Joe.

As for against the Steelers, I think that the gameplan was very sound and efficient. No team is going to beat you guys by just unloading on your secondary. Your blitz package is way too good. I think that us pounding the ball with LeRon, hitting Willis and Rice on the screen, then Mason and Clayton on the short routes is the way to beat you guys. Scoring quickly against the Steelers is not always going to get you the win, cause Ben can do anything to any defense.

Cam’s offense was very sound. IMO of the last 13 years, this was the most exciting Ravens offense I have ever seen, and we did it with a boring passing game. I think that this offense is very similar to what he had in SD. I would love to see more Heap and now more LJ Smith. Get that 3rd WR and a deep threat, and you will be seeing one of the most efficient offenses in the NFL for years to come……I hope

You have to hate losing more than you love winning.

by Mr MaLoR on Apr 21, 2009 12:30 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I respect that this post is not immature bashing of Joe

Thanks guys.

You have to hate losing more than you love winning.

by Mr MaLoR on Apr 20, 2009 7:24 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

And Blitzburgh for doing a great breakdown of our offense

For last year and this year, but I disagree greatly with what you said about if we get too aggressive, it could be worse for us.

You have to hate losing more than you love winning.

by Mr MaLoR on Apr 20, 2009 7:25 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I think

Troy polamalu, Dwayne Washington, William Gay, and Tyrone Carter disagree, they all picked off ya boy whenever he got too aggressive.

by tannofsteel84 on Apr 20, 2009 9:24 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs


User Tools

Welcome to BTSC, a blog dedicated to the SIX-time world champion Steelers.

"Thoughtful discussion with a sense of history."

Art Rooney Jr.

"Level-headed thinking." Pittsburgh Post-Gazette

Start posting about the Steelers »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
What players have you most wished could have been Steelers?
2196876391_dcb0380cb0_small
Okay. We need some fun!
Me_small
The BTSC Predict the Score Competition, Wk 11 @ KC Chiefs
J_page_small
Talk Chiefs with AP
Miketomlin-200_small
A look to 2005 and back to the present

Recent FanPosts

Small
Assistance Needed
Small
2010 NFL Mock Draft : Updated 11/20
Markstadiumoutside_small
Stephen Logan needs to go
Franco72_small
Keisel The Diesel
Scr_logo_v5_small
STEEL CURTAIN RADIO #47: ARE THE CHIEFS SLUMP BUSTERS?
Small
Steelers vs. Cowboys
Sidney_steelers_small
Gatewood added to practice squad
Small
Timmons and the linebackers disappointment?

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Latest NFL Headlines from SB Nation

Mobile Live
Garrett Wolfe Out For the Year (Updated)
Mobile Live
Friday Notes: Lions Place Stephen Peterman on IR, Sign Eric Fowler
Mobile Live
Well, Isn't That Special (Teams)?

SPONSORS


Site Founder & Editor

Mbean_small Blitzburgh

Steelers Historian

Steeler_small maryrose

Bringing You Your Daily Six Pack

Plainview_small drinkyourmilkshake