Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: The Animated GIFs Of January

Who Is The Best NFL Team Of The Y2K Decade?

Bumped from the Fanposts. An excellent dog days of the NFL offseason article and conversation starter by one of BTSC's stalwart die hard football fanatics. Good stuff and nicely written as usual from 5020. Cheers. -Blitz-

***********

The Rams started out as the team to beat for “Team of the Decade” status in 2000. With an exciting Super Bowl win against the Titans featuring a late shoe string tackle by Mike Jones (who would go on to play (or not play) for the Steelers) The Rams featured Dick Vermeil as Head Coach and “The Greatest Show on Turf” offense led by Arena League refugee Kurt Warner. The Rams seemed poised to win half a dozen Lombardi’s but as so often happens in the NFL (except in Pittsburgh and New England) front office instability helped lead to their downfall. Vermeil retired. Offensive guru but decision and motivationally challenged Mike Martz took over. The Rams were upset by the New England Patriots* in 2002 after a Raven title in 2001. Warner was jettisoned.

Star-divide

 

 

The New England victory in 2002 at the Louisiana Super Dome marked the resurgence of the next challenger to “Team of the Decade” status. The Pats* stunning season led them to Pittsburgh for the AFC Championship game against Bill Cowher, Kordell Stewart and the Pittsburgh Steelers who had been looking for their one for the thumb throughout Cowher’s tenure in the 90’s. In the game, the Steelers D knocked Tom Brady out of the game and the Pats* were sparked by Drew Bledsoe and a clutch special teams squad which upended the Steelers 24-17 on route to their first Lombardi in club history and first championship of the Y2K decade. The Steelers had their chances late in the game but 2 interceptions by Slash Stewart in the last 3 minutes of the game sealed the Steelers fate. Were the Patriots* using film and stealing the Steelers signals? At times it sure seemed that way but thanks to Roger Goodell burning all the evidence we will probably never know.

 

The Patriots* turned dynasty, cheating or not over the next few years staking claim to “Team of the Decade” and making a push for “Team of the Ages.” Brady seemed unflappable and unstoppable. Belicheat* had a counter move for every move. An exciting last minute 32-29 win over Carolina in 2003 and another exciting and tight 24-21 win against Donovan McNabb’s Eagles in 2004 seemed to cement the Pats* status as the best of Y2K and conversation began about if they were as good or better than the 60’s Packers, the 70’s Steelers or the 80’s 49ers.

 

Then from the ashes of the 2004 AFC Championship game came a new challenger from the city of Steel. Bill Cowher’s Steelers made an improbable ride on the road and on the emotion of getting Jerome Bettis home to Detroit for his last Bus ride. When Belicheat*s Pats* fell to Denver in a flurry of turnovers the stage was set for Pittsburgh to get the elusive one for the thumb. After pummeling Carson Palmer and the Bungles and then upsetting the heavily favored and once 13-0 Colts the Steelers beat Denver handily at Mile High and behind 3 big plays beat the Seattle Seahawks on February 5, 2006 at Ford Field in Detroit 21-10 for the last Bus stop.

 

Rather than buckle down like the 70’s Steelers this band of Black & Gold road warriors partied like there was no tomorrow. After QB and leader Ben Roethlisberger almost killed himself in a helmet-less motorcycle crash it was downhill. Peyton Manning won his elusive title in February 2007 and New England reestablished themselves in the 2007 regular season with an unmatched 17-0 record plus 2 playoff victories. Dynasty status and Y2K laurels seemed destiny. Then a crazy thing happened to the Pats* on the way to the coronation. Swirling controversy over the Belicheat* tapes met the charged up New York Giants. The Giants came out swinging and staggered the Patriots* with a 17-14 Super Bowl win (the Pats* 3rd Lombardi loss in franchise history) to stop the dynasty talk.

 

In 2008 regular season the Pittsburgh Steelers were retooled under the direction of young Mike Tomlin. Led by Elway like QB Ben Roethlisberger and one of the greatest defenses the league had ever seen the Pittsburgh Steelers charged to Super Bowl XLIII on February 1st 2008. They beat the Arizona Cardinals and their comeback QB Kurt Warner (see the 2000 Rams) 27-23 in one of the most exciting Super Bowl’s of all time. The Steelers now have 2 Lombardi titles in the last 4 years and are poised to challenge for a 3rd in 2009. Another Super Bowl title in XLIV will create a huge argument for “Team of the Y2K Decade” with Steel City fans pitted against chowder heads. One simple way to stamp the Steelers ticket would be to beat New England in the AFC Championship game this season on route to the “Stairway to Seven.” In my opinion, a Pittsburgh Super Bowl title over the bodies of the Patriots* this season gives Pittsburgh the title of “Team of the Decade.”  It’s a long road. There are games to play. Injuries to avoid. Unforeseen challenges to conquer. But in the dog days of summer with Latrobe still in the distance now is the time to hope and dream. Hopefully for the Steelers now is the time to train. Here We Go Steelers!

Comment 51 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

I think that if we repeat this coming season

Then we are the team of the decade. As long as our D plays similarly to last year, we’ll also have the defense of the decade too.

It's true what they say...Even the NFL's Big Wigs hate the Steelers. On the plus side, I can now tell my future grand kids about Hines Ward and how the NFL made rules because of him. Roger Goodell, you make me sick.

by Tim Mullhaupt (HSS) on May 17, 2009 2:37 PM EDT reply actions  

I think at best we tie. We cant overtake them (tie in super bowls at best), and they beat us head to head in 2 championship games. Of course we are a different team now (better than they are now) but they were better in the first half of the decade. I hate them, and I know they cheated, but a tie is the best we can do. But heck, a tie would still give us 2 of the last 4 decades…which is incredible. Even if we are tied, it still makes us hands down the best franchise in Football.

Plus, we arent measuring that we would have 7 SB titles, Ben would have 3 and would be a guaranteed HOFer, and I think LeBeau would finally be inducted because of it. If we win this year, I think we will have at least 4 Hall of Famers from this team: Ben, Hines, Alan Faneca, Troy, and then 4 others I think could be: Lamar, James Harrison, James Farrior, and Santonio (he would need another 2 SB’s and would need to break Hines’ Steeler records). Not to mention Frank the Tank and AQ Shipley being named to it…

by Michael Uhlhorn on May 18, 2009 1:02 AM EDT up reply actions  

Patriot's HOFers

Brady (BOOO!), Moss (as a Viking), Vinatiari, and then late coming Patriots like Seau and Fred Taylor who wont count for consideration. Having only one player who will have played for the team the entire Dynasty (Brady) makes them a worse overall team than us. History may remember us as having the better team, but we will have an equal decade.

Plus, Cowher is a HOF coach along with LeBeau. Belichick will be a HOF coach (unless he gets caught cheating again) and if we win one or more SB’s and he stays for another 10+ years, Tomlin will be another HOF coach. That would put us at 3 coaches to 1. I think we will be remembered with better talent, but they have the media Bias on their side…

by Michael Uhlhorn on May 18, 2009 1:16 AM EDT up reply actions  

I think you think the HOF is a lot easier to get inducted into than it actually is.

by worldtrip on May 18, 2009 2:37 AM EDT up reply actions  

Yes

7 total guaranteed HOF players from two of the best teams in a decade, that is me thinking it is sooo easy.

The other players on the team I listed have the potential to be HOF players.

by Michael Uhlhorn on May 18, 2009 4:20 PM EDT up reply actions  

How do you figure?

How do you put Harrison, Lamar, and Holmes in? They are all relatively new to the league. Waaaaaay to early to consider anything like that.

by John Stephens on May 18, 2009 11:12 AM EDT up reply actions  

Didnt say they were guaranteed

I said that they could go on to have HOF careers. They have the potential to is all I meant. I dont see that potential with any Patriot players.

by Michael Uhlhorn on May 18, 2009 4:15 PM EDT up reply actions  

Team of the Decade

In order to actually lay claim to Team of the Decade, the Steelers will have to beat the Pats in an important game. Say they do this next season, then that will leave three apiece for each franchise. The tiebreaker, in my opinion would be the fact that the Pats collapsed in the Super Bowl against the Giants, whereas the Steelers didn’t, even though the Pats will likely claim the crown from the media.

by docsteeler on May 17, 2009 5:35 PM EDT reply actions  

WoW!

Good piece. You covered a lot of ground. I’m sure I’m not alone in saying that I wish Tom Brady was healthy and on the field when we trounced them this past season. I’m sure I’m not alone in saying we owe them some more Whoopins! Bring on a Pats/Steelers AFCC game in ’10. Bring it on! Be it at in the “Burgh” or Bean Town! Enuff said! Here we Go Steelers….Here we Go!

by steelersrock08 on May 17, 2009 7:24 PM EDT reply actions  

All Decade Team anyone?

Here’s my shot…

QB – Peyton Manning
RB – Ladanian Tomlinson
FB – Lorenzo Neal
TE – Tony Gonzales
WR – Terrell Owens
WR – Randy Moss
T – Walter Jones
G – Alan Faneca
C – Kevin Mawae
G – Steve Hutchinson
T – Jonathan Ogden

DE – Michael Strahan
DT – Warren Sapp
DT – Casey Hampton
DE – Jason Taylor
OLB – Joey Porter
ILB – Ray Lewis
OLB – Derrick Brooks
CB – Champ Bailey
FS – Ed Reed
SS – Troy Polamalu
CB – Ty Law

K – Adam Vinatieri
P – Shane Lechler
KR – Dante Hall

And related to the write up, I think if we can tie NE for rings this decade we should win by default considering spygate.

by tdp992 on May 17, 2009 8:21 PM EDT reply actions  

I can't honestly put Manning over Brady

I know Manning is beyond human but Brady is beyond even that. I understand the whole spygate thing but still Tom Brady is a machine. I don’t like him but he’s one of the better QB’s in history.

It's true what they say...Even the NFL's Big Wigs hate the Steelers. On the plus side, I can now tell my future grand kids about Hines Ward and how the NFL made rules because of him. Roger Goodell, you make me sick.

by Tim Mullhaupt (HSS) on May 17, 2009 10:49 PM EDT up reply actions  

i was seriosuly so split on both of them

manning only won the tie breaker since i hate brady. i think if manning struggles this year with a brand new head coach and OC, then you can go ahead and put brady on top then.

by tdp992 on May 17, 2009 11:05 PM EDT up reply actions  

Manning is a loser

He has a losing playoff record, and his one ring came from the Bears rubbing bacon grease on their hands and fumbling every other play.

by Mechem on May 18, 2009 11:37 AM EDT up reply actions  

Brady doesnt have the stats. He is a winner, but he only put up the stats with arguably the second best receiver ever, Moss. I think Manning will retire as the best quarterback in football history, which makes him better than Brady. Brady’s team won more, but there is no way he is better.

Regardless, if I had the first pick in a fantasy draft to start a franchise, I would have picked Ben at any point in the Decade. He fits us better than any other quarterback playing currently would have.

by Michael Uhlhorn on May 18, 2009 1:22 AM EDT up reply actions  

Brady won playoff games with crap WR’s. Won them himself. Won Super Bowls with crap WR’s, won them. QB’s are made in the playoffs. Manning is a great QB, but he’s nowhere near as good as Brady in he playoffs. So he isn’t as good as Brady.

Throw the regular season out. Throw it away. Brady makes the HOF and belongs in the top five QB’s of all time because of what he did in the Playoffs.

Montana
Elway
Bradshaw
Starr
Brady

that’s my list. You ain’t nothing as a QB if you don’t win in the playoffs. Ben needs two more rings and he can step in the all-time category.

Sure he can score goals, but can he cook?

by Phantaskippy on May 18, 2009 7:18 PM EDT up reply actions  

Ok

If we measure by your standards, you have to put Steve Young for winning in a tougher era, and Aikman for winning 3 in the 90’s. All things considered, there have been 4 great teams this decade (Indy, Pitt, NE, and Phi) unlike the 90’s when you had a much tougher decade. Leaving Aikman off this list and putting Brady on (when without Vinatieri he doesnt win any of those championships) is absurd.

by Michael Uhlhorn on May 18, 2009 10:19 PM EDT up reply actions  

Forgot

I didnt address this, but Brady is NOT one of the better QB’s in NFL history. He isnt in the top 10
Bradshaw
Elway
Favre
Unitas
Starr
Staubach
Manning
Marino
Montana
Young

by Michael Uhlhorn on May 18, 2009 1:25 AM EDT up reply actions  

It's all fairly objective, but

you have to give Brady more credit. I’m by no means a fan, but the guy has 3 rings, 2 SB MVP’s and has played his best football (for the most part) when it counts. As Steelers fans, we know that statistics aren’t the deciding factor in determining a quarterback’s ability, and in a 2 minute drill to win a Superbowl, Brady and Roethlisberger are the two guys I’d want behind center. Manning’s regular season statistics are impressive and flashy, but I don’t believe that’s all that makes a good QB.

I don’t want to get into a Montana – Marino type debate on championships vs. statistics, but for my money, Brady’s the best quarterback of the past decade.

by BulletToothTony on May 18, 2009 1:50 AM EDT up reply actions  

agreed

brady has done nothing but play consistently since being given a chance. Numbers not always flashy, but no huge choke jobs like Manning.

by Michael Bean on May 18, 2009 2:38 AM EDT up reply actions  

Brady once had

4000 yards with no receiver getting 1000yds himself, and not because they were injured.

I find that really impressive. Manning usually relies on just 1 or 2 main receivers. Brady had to make do without any true receiving threat until he had Moss

Bleeding Black and Gold since 1989 baby, Blitzburgh is back, time for a repeat!

by Michael Hewitt on May 18, 2009 3:04 AM EDT up reply actions  

yea

I said Brady has not always had huge numbers, but of course, he also HAS had monster seasons. As in like the best season ever for a QB arguably.

by Michael Bean on May 18, 2009 3:22 AM EDT up reply actions  

Was agreeing with you Blitz

Probably the most unflashy 4000 yard season ever that time. Mainly because there was no juicy WR complimenting the main dish.

Bleeding Black and Gold since 1989 baby, Blitzburgh is back, time for a repeat!

by Michael Hewitt on May 18, 2009 3:25 AM EDT up reply actions  

yea, i feel you, same page. didnt mean to come across in way but agreement

Anyway, Brady can play, great teammate. Was a big reason why Randy Moss is no longer a distraction, but instead just a really really good player wanting to take his WR craft seriously.

Enough Brady talk for me though :p Getting kinda queasy.

Freel free to email me anytime at behindthesteelcurtain@gmail.com with questions, suggestions, complaints, etc, or to just say what's up. -Michael Bean (Blitz)

by Michael Bean on May 18, 2009 4:05 AM EDT up reply actions  

Sorry i missed that

I had to go throw up

Bleeding Black and Gold since 1989 baby, Blitzburgh is back, time for a repeat!

by Michael Hewitt on May 18, 2009 4:08 AM EDT up reply actions  

hehe

Freel free to email me anytime at behindthesteelcurtain@gmail.com with questions, suggestions, complaints, etc, or to just say what's up. -Michael Bean (Blitz)

by Michael Bean on May 18, 2009 4:23 AM EDT up reply actions  

Can't agree...

He makes this list, over (at least) Staubach and Young.

by NYSteelersFan4 on May 18, 2009 9:56 AM EDT up reply actions  

Agreed

Hate to join the love fest – but Brady is a great QB. Hard to rank active players (who are still in their prime) but my sense is 3 rings puts him deep into the conversation. Also feel that the Patriots currently have bragging rights. If we win next year – especially if we are able to beat them on the way there, then it becomes a tie/toss up – but scandals or not you have to give these guys there due. As much as it pains me those Patriots teams beat some of the best Steelers teams ever on their way to the superbowls. They did so because their QB played better then our QB and because their special teams demolished ours and because their coach out coached (possibly by some degree of cheating – but still) our coach. It’s that simple.

by SteelerBuddha on May 18, 2009 4:11 PM EDT up reply actions  

Pretty good

As mentioned Manning has to gtfo…

I’d also give Mack Strong a nod over Lorenzo Neal. Played more and has a cooler name, and he helped Alexander be good for a few years. And being good in Seattle is work.

by Mechem on May 18, 2009 11:39 AM EDT up reply actions  

Gotta disagree Mechem...

Look at Lorenzo’s carer, he blocked for 1,000 yard rushers almost every year, not just a few with one good HB, and a few were record breaking or near record breaking years with different HB’s behind him. Neal played one more year than Strong on each end of his career (Neal started in ’93 and played last year, Strong started in ’94 and his career ended a little earlier due to injury). I do agree, much cooler name though.

I would throw Tony Richardson’s name on the list of guys who fell just short to Neal as well, probably right after Strong.

by NYSteelersFan4 on May 18, 2009 1:03 PM EDT up reply actions  

Solid argument

I was just looking to find another worthy different name out there.

by Mechem on May 19, 2009 9:28 AM EDT up reply actions  

Nice post 5020,

as for the All Decade Team, if we’re going 4-3 on D, I don’t think Hampton makes it (in the 3-4 definately would). For KR, I would want Devin Hester.

Good list though. It’s also hard not to want to see Freeney in there, though.

by betelgeuse on May 17, 2009 8:57 PM EDT reply actions  

hester

i really wanted to put him there but realistically he’s only had two years as a successful KR man, since the bears pulled him out of the job in 08. no doubt he’d be up there if he’d gotten as many touches as Hall did in his career since the guy flat out flies.

and as for DE’s, it was definitely hard to keep out freeney and peppers.

by tdp992 on May 17, 2009 11:09 PM EDT up reply actions  

Hear me out on this -- I swear I'm not crazy!

The case I’m about to make may sound a bit ridiculous to many of you, but hear me out. I swear I’m not crazy.

There’s no doubt the Pats have the edge on us for Team of the Decade at the moment. Their three Lombardis trump our two, and they’ve beaten us in just about every big head-to-head matchup. However, if we were to beat them in the playoffs this year and win a third Lombardi ourselves I think our claim to Team of the Decade would be solid.

Now, I can’t believe I’m about to write this, but here’s why we might have an advantage on them should we meet this coming January: Bruce Arians. I know, I know, I just had to check my own pulse to make sure I’m lucid. But consider: if you go back to the early 90s when Parcells was coaching the Pats, we’ve consistently struggled with them. I was at a game at Three Rivers in ‘93 where we had to stop a Drew Bledsoe QB sneak from the 1 on the game’s final play to win 17-14. We were a playoff team that year and they went 1-15. Then they kicked our ass in the ‘96 playoffs and, under Belichick, had our number in all of the big games this past decade. One of the biggest reasons why they were able to neutralize us, particularly on offense, is this: the power run game that the Steelers used for all of those years was devised by Ron Erhardt, who was Parcells’s offensive coordinator throughout his glory years with the Giants. Belichick was Parcells’s defensive coordinator at the same time, so for years Belichick had inside knowledge of how that offense worked, and more importantly how to stop it. Of course, this isn’t the only reason the Pats beat us in all of those big games. Our quarterback play in most of them was awful. But we could never, ever run the ball against them, which placed too much responsibility on our QB’s who weren’t, at the time, ready to handle it. Their intimate knowledge of how our run game worked gave them an advantage we couldn’t compensate for.

Now, rewind to last year’s 33-10 ass-whoopin’ of the Pats up in Foxboro. We rushed for 172 yards out of the BA one-back zone scheme, something we were never able to do (outside of the win at Heinz in ‘04 when Jerome ran wild) under the old Erhardt scheme. I don’t love Arians by any stretch of the imagination, but the simple fact that with him as our coordinator New England no longer has that intimate knowledge of our system is significant. If we meet in the playoffs this year, there’s no doubt Belichick will have studied last year’s game inside-out and found ways to combat what we were doing. But in that one-back set, with the endless combination of shifts, motions and formations that BA uses, the defense will have a harder time game-planning than when there was a fullback in the backfield taking them to the ball. I’m not saying this guarantees that we’ll be successful. All I’m saying is that the Pats don’t know this system the way they knew the old Erhardt system. And that may level the playing field just enough to topple them should we meet this year, thus allowing us to claim Team of the Decade status.

So there you have it, my one and probably only public shout-out to Bruce Arians. And if it all goes to hell against New England come January, I’ll deny I ever wrote this…

by cliff harris is still a punk! on May 18, 2009 8:54 AM EDT reply actions   1 recs

Props

No its perfectly logical. The crazy bumbling idiot is impossible to read.

But your logic IS off. Its cause they had videotaped our offense so they knew how we were going to run. They have no tapes of BA.

by Mechem on May 18, 2009 11:36 AM EDT up reply actions  

I think I get it

Since we rarely finish a running play, no one knows what they are supposed to look like.

Solid strategy. :)

by Varmint on May 18, 2009 1:30 PM EDT up reply actions  

Patriots Cheated.

That should strip them of their title. I would feel this way even if the Steelers weren’t a contender for Team of the Deacade. I don’t like cheaters and don’t think they should be eligible for this fictitional title. If it were any other contest they would have been disqualified a long time ago!

If the Steelers win it all this year it will seal the deal. Even without the cheating the Steelers will be team of the decade.

by fanofsteel on May 18, 2009 11:19 AM EDT reply actions  

I hate cheaters and they stank

People argued “what they did didnt really help them”

Then why do it, why risk draft pick punishment and the like?

They knew full well what they were doing, I have no respect for Bill Beli-asshole-cheat, he has to be the most un-professional coach I’ve ever watched.

So anyway I’d say unfortunately our team has to win this year plain and simple. And beat the pats on the way.

Otherwise I wanna give it to the G-men for beating the pats.

by Mechem on May 18, 2009 11:33 AM EDT reply actions  

Great debate topic, no doubt...

But as useless as the “America’s Team” arguements. Its all media BS, all that matters to me is that we keep on winning game after game, and moving on to those Superbowls. I doubt any of this even matters to those involved.

by NYSteelersFan4 on May 18, 2009 1:44 PM EDT reply actions  

just a thought

I think a stronger argument for the Steelers is if we win the superbowl this year AND the Pats are under .500 and miss the playoffs. We’d have been in the playoffs 7 of 10 seasons, and only one season under .500, compared to the Pats who would have missed the playoffs 4 times in 10 years and had two seasons under .500. I’m rooting for that. And then the media might back off the Pats-love a bit.

by strzelczyk on May 18, 2009 1:54 PM EDT reply actions  

Pats hands down.

3 SB titles and 1 perfect regular season is greater than whatever else we could accomplish at this point*. And to win 2/3 rings they had to beat us AT HOME and they did both times without any trouble.

  • - Realistically speaking. The only exception would be if Pittsburgh were to go 19-0 this year and beat NE by about 50 pts in the AFCCG. Then we would have a legit claim with 5 AFCCG appearances, 3 SB wins, and the second perfect season of all time.

by JHolmes on May 18, 2009 2:04 PM EDT reply actions  

IMHO, Jholmes, better cheer 4 t Putrids, I don´t think so. That 1º "title", came from t tuck rule, and was

t only time it was applied, (soooorry for those officials) until that point. And also if u have seen all those NFL replays of that game almost all the audience were first resigned, because they at that point had lost that game, and also they were surprised of theresult of that assault. T result was Brady has tree, sorry 1 legit + 2 half helped rings, (I remember at the first of those wins over t Steelers, a see that the blockers from NE CHEATERS beatting the rockies with their fists, almost in all the returns of kicks, and kick-offs) then we can talk, that Brady is reaching the same level of Mr. Ben Roethlisberger, not the other way. So if u r going 2 remember putrid, sorry legacies then u have a point, but remembering them for the (only application) of t “patriot” tuck rule and also u have to add up they cheat, t best t nfl can do to clean up that mess is give t Steelers that last decade pick and the title of t Team of the Decade.

All that Belly(fullof)shet has done, make no sense to all that t NFL is doing in another areas, they r very preocupied of anybody doing almost nothing and they burn all those tapes, kind of justice.

Better we remember “The immaculate reception”, not the “maculated putrid conception”, sorry 4 t french.

O sales tickets,...and let D rest a little, and D Win Championships.

by YeOldeMexFan on May 18, 2009 3:01 PM EDT reply actions  

If U have any doubt see this

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WHEQtASq9BI

O sales tickets,...and let D rest a little, and D Win Championships.

by YeOldeMexFan on May 18, 2009 3:25 PM EDT reply actions  

Better t Raiders as champions than those rotten putrids.

in that video you can see Brady walking out of field knowing it was his fault, and was indeed a fumble of he was responsible for.

O sales tickets,...and let D rest a little, and D Win Championships.

by YeOldeMexFan on May 18, 2009 3:31 PM EDT reply actions  

On Comments

Thanks for the props!
1) I stand by my statement that if the Steelers win a Lombardi this year over the bodies of the Pats* then they are the “Team of the Decade”
2) Pats* cheated but they are still the team to beat for the title. It’s not how you play the game, it’s whether you win. As they say “if you ain’t cheatin’ you ain’t trying”
3) Brady is a lock for the Hall. Maybe Belicheat* if the writers see past the tapes. Not sure any Steelers are locks outside of maybe Bettis. Ward is worthy but his stats are not what they could be. Cowher, Troy and Ben? We’ll see.
4) Tom Brady is a stud. He would be on my list of 10 greatest QB’s of all time and he would be my QB for the All Decade team unless Ben has a great season and leads the Steelers on another Elway like comeback to a Super Bowl title.
5) I hate the Raiders! The greatest Super Bowl of all time that the Steelers weren’t winning was the game in 02 featuring the Buc’s stamping the Raiders mercilessly. I never had more fun watching a game the Steelers weren’t playing in.

When You Run The Ball Good Things Happen

by 5020 on May 19, 2009 2:53 PM EDT reply actions  

Sorry again 5020, but even if u are saying that u like Brady over

BB is clearly a mistake, Why? 1º)´cause We are the Steelers, We dont cheat, even knowing that for somebody else in the NFL it is their motto, but not here. In Pittsburgh We try as hard as we can but never have the goal of “try to cheat”, if it happend, it´s OK, but never is your goal. No one can build up a franchise like this thinking like Oakland or worst NE putrids. Put those words in any of the Rooney´s, mostly on “The Boss”, (now even Tomlin). 2º) BB won 15-1 in his first season, won a SB in his 2º, and if he does not suffer that accident, their stats should had been superhuman.That pile over BB, 8 loses, and even with those, BB has more W´s than Brady. Brady? maybe BB back up. Sorry man¡. Please review those tapes in those links. Mostly Brady´s body language, then we took. Its OK that everybody is putting all that **** over the putrids, but IMHO t NFL should have taken all this actions: take those 4 to 6 games, as lost for them, taken all their draft selections out that year, and Belly(fullof)shet out at least 2 to 5 years out of the game, so nobody doesn´t even think about cheatting, that situation put the NFL at the same level of the MLB, they cheat, and we accept, they cheat, we forgot, and so on…
This game is for MEN only, all the way men. If that includes cheat, better play marbles or else¡.

O sales tickets,...and let D rest a little, and D Win Championships.

by YeOldeMexFan on May 20, 2009 4:08 AM EDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to BTSC, a blog dedicated to the SIX-time world champion Steelers.

"Thoughtful discussion with a sense of history."

Art Rooney Jr.

"Level-headed thinking." Pittsburgh Post-Gazette

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Franco72_small
The Last Sunday
Small
Joe Greene on Steelers Offense Under BA
Small
Homer reps BTSC and Steeler Nation on Washington Post Front Page
Small
Your Super Bowl Hate Guide
Steeler_nation_small
University of BTSC: Masters of Science degree in Steelerology Required Core Course 201: Using Quantum Mechanics to Understand the Baltimore Ravens (and their Fans).

Recent FanPosts

Steel-ball-logo-poster_small
Knowing Your Guards: A look at the 2012 Prospects (Updated 2/11/12)
Rodthreerivers_small
Report: Steelers Don't Want Ward
Small
Analyzing the Steelers 2008 Draft
Small
My Top 11 Prospects for our First Round Pick
Small
Ike Taylor restructures, over 18 million in cap space created so far this offseason
Small
Analyzing the Steelers 2009 Draft
Small
6 Round NFL Mock Draft
Steeler_small
Steelers Cut Their Salary Problem in Half
Small
Woodley restructures contract
Bonek_small
Haley's Day One in Steelers office

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Terrible Towel Talk

Listen to internet radio with Michael Bean on Blog Talk Radio


Site Founder & Editor

Imag0299_small Michael Bean

Steelers Historian

Steeler_small maryrose

Bison_small Neal Coolong

Contributing Authors

Small Ivan Cole (RickVa)

Franco72_small 5020

Btsc_head_shot_small Rebecca Rollett

Small big_jay71

Stogs_small John Stephens

178896_499126548441_596563441_5939410_7960015_n_small Anthony Defeo