Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Jerry Sandusky's Wife Tries To Run A Reporter Over

A Closer Look At The Pittsburgh Steelers 2009 Schedule

Greetings friends. So, not all that scintillating a post idea to get back in to the swing of things after my little hiatus but I had started this awhile back and was needing to just get the wheels greased a bit before hopefully getting back to a very high paced as we approach the start of training camp in just about a month's time. Hope all have been well. - Blitz- (Michael B.)

**************

I wanted to take a closer look at the 2009 Steelers schedule on this Monday - but I hope to do more than just look at the names on the schedule and make any sort of black-or-white conclusion. Instead I'm going to be taking a look to see how the Steelers 2009 schedule is arranged sequentially and try to make a few observations about the schedule as a whole. Before I go any further, let's take a look at the slate of games once more.

Superbowl-steelers_medium

Star-divide

1 Thu, Sept. 10 vs. Tennessee Titans NBC 8:30 p.m.
2 Sun, Sept. 20 at Chicago Bears CBS 4:15 p.m.
3 Sun, Sept. 27 at Cincinnati Bengals CBS 1 p.m.
4 Sun, Oct. 4 vs. San Diego Chargers NBC 8:20 p.m.
5 Sun, Oct. 11 at Detroit Lions CBS 1 p.m.
6 Sun, Oct. 18 vs. Cleveland Browns CBS 1 p.m.
7 Sun, Oct. 25 vs. Minnesota Vikings FOX 1 p.m.
8 Bye
9 Mon, Nov. 9 at Denver Broncos ESPN 8:30 p.m.
10 Sun, Nov. 15 vs. Cincinnati Bengals CBS 1 p.m.
11 Sun, Nov. 22 at Kansas City Chiefs CBS 1 p.m.
12 Sun, Nov. 29 at Baltimore Ravens NBC 8:20 p.m.
13 Sun, Dec. 6 vs. Oakland Raiders CBS 1 p.m.
14 Thu, Dec. 10 at Cleveland Browns NFLN 8:20 p.m.
15 Sun, Dec. 20 vs. Green Bay Packers FOX 1 p.m.
16 Sun, Dec. 27 vs. Baltimore Ravens CBS 1 p.m.
17 Sun, Jan. 3 at Miami Dolphins CBS 1 p.m.

 

Some thoughts.

  1. The Steelers have won five straight on Opening Weekend. Their last loss was to the New England Patriots in 2003. It will be tough to extend that streak this year against the reigning AFC regular season champs from a year ago, the Tennessee Titans. Heinz Field will of course be rocking as rings are handed out to the champions wearing the black and gold. But Jeff Fisher isn't the ideal coach to square off against in Week 1. The Titans had a phenomenal game plan against the Steelers when the two teams met last year in Week 15.

  2. I think that Pittsburgh will ultimately hit its stride in the second half of the season, but Week 2 won't be that much easier than Week 1 - if any at all. The Bears don't sport the same vaunted defense that they did earlier this decade, but the Steelers trip to Soldier Field will be their first game in a hostile environment since Week 15 against the Titans last year - unless you count the Super Bowl, which was heavily pro-Pittsburgh in terms of the crowd. How will the offensive line hold up that week? Can Big Ben protect the football and make smart decisions, particularly if there are windy conditions? 0-2 isn't the end of the world, nor is it necessarily a probable outcome to begin the 2009 season. But it's well within the realm of possibility. It could be fairly comical watching part of the fanbase hit the panic button if so.

  3. Weeks 3 and 4 remain tough for Pittsburgh. Steelers fans - myself included - usually just pencil in a W when Bengals_d_mediumthe word 'Cincinnati' appears on the schedule. But if the Bengals defense continues on its upward trajectory and Carson Palmer remains healthy while returning to form, the Bengals will again be a tougher out than they've been the past two years. Then there's the Chargers waiting in Week 4. San Diego and Pittsburgh will play at Heinz Field for the third time in as many meetings. The Steelers peaked and played perhaps their best game of the year on offense in the Divisional Round of last year's playoffs, but the Chargers were out of gas. San Diego remains an enigma in this league but I think it's fair to say that they still have the firepower on both sides of the ball to give any team fits. With Shawne Merriman returning, the Steelers offensive line might not have the same walk in the park that they did the last two meetings last season. From where I'm sitting, the first quarter of the Steelers 2009 season appears to be demanding. Pittsburgh may very well go 4-0 or 3-1, but the games will be physical and tightly contested. That might not be such a bad thing, however.

  4. Things then open up nicely for the Steelers before their BYE Week in early Novemeber. Pittsburgh travels to Detroit to play a Lions team that definitely will be improved, but still nowhere near ready to play a defense as stout as Pittsburgh's. Then the Steelers return to Heinz Field to host the Browns and the Vikings. The Minnesota game should be entertaining, but the Vikings were a very ho-hum team on the road. They finsihed a respectable 4-4, but one of those Ws was against the hapless Lions and another came against the Cardinals in Week 15 when Arizona had packed it in and was in full-fledged free-fall mode. I really like the Steelers chances to win all three of these games and head to the BYE Week with some momentum and an opportunity to get some much needed rest.

  5. In Mike Tomlin's first year in Pittsburgh in 2007, the Steelers failed to put away mediocre teams away from home. The New York Jets and the Arizona Cardinals come immediately to mind. In 2008, Pittsburgh took care of business against lesser opponents on the road (and at home too for that matter). This Broncos game Denver-invesco_field_mediumcoming out of the BYE is a game I'd categorize as a game that the Steelers should win if they play well. It's hard to win on the road in the NFL, no doubt. But Denver lacks the type of defense that can give Pittsburgh problems. And conversely, of course, Pittsburgh's defense should be well equipped to handle the Broncos supposedly explosive offense. I look at this game and I see it as one that could signal great things for this team, yet I also see it as one that could really expose some of the team's potential flaws. Those being - a potentially weaker secondary without Bryant McFadden; an offensive line that's still not consistent enough to exploit lesser defenses; and an inability to pick apart weak secondarys due to a dearth of legitimate pass-catching options past the top two guys on the depth chart. I look forward to this one quite a bit.

  6. The Steelers would be well served winning Weeks 10 and 11 against the Bengals and at the Chiefs. That Chiefs game is another one of those potential trap games that absolutely should be wins but won't come free.

  7. Here's where it gets tricky once more, in my opinion. The Steelers must wait until Week 13 to play the rival Ravens for the first time in 2009. The first of the two meetings will be played in Baltimore before Pittsburgh hosts the Ravens in Week 16. Last year, the two teams played more than ten weeks apart, and if you Hines1_mediumremember how the first of the two regular season meetings went down, we can all be thankful that the schedule lined up that way. Had the Steelers had to play Baltimore for the second time before everyone got healthy, who knows what would have happened either in that game or for the remainder of the season. Color me extremely concerned about potential injury problems heading in to the playoffs. Even if the Steelers are fortunate enough to survive those two contests without major injury problems to key players, the games will surely both be physically and mentally draining. We saw what happened to the Steelers after having to travel to Baltimore in Week 14 last year - they ran out of gas and were beaten up physically by the Titans the next week. 

  8. The Steelers regular season concludes with a road trip to Miami to take on the Dolphins. I'll keep it brief and let me just say that I hope there's nothing at stake here. For starters - and it relates back to my last point about the Ravens - I don't like the thought of traveling to Miami after a potentially pivotal divisional game with the Ravens. Certainly not with a playoff berth on the line. Anyway, too many unexpected things can - and likely will - happen before Week 17 so there's no sense in speculating too much here but this Week 17 matchup with the Dolphins is one of the tougher games on the slate. It could be either a blessing or a curse that it happens to come in the season's final week, when playoff bound teams often are able to expend less than maximum energy and effort trying to win.

Comment 34 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Good point about the first two games

Neither one is a gimme for sure! Hopefully the Philly game last year will be fresh in the offense’s minds….

by acrollet on Jun 23, 2009 7:31 AM EDT reply actions  

well… Tennessee will not have Haynesworth, and they have quarterback issues.

Chicago is improving, but they are still a team with Devin Hester (!) as their #1 WR, so i don’t take them too seriously.

by weegiethompson on Jun 24, 2009 4:14 PM EDT up reply actions  

Looking forward to the season.

Obviously nothing is easy in the NFL, but this schedule compared to the gauntlet we had last year looks much more inviting…

When I say who dey, you say we dey. @ChrisFAbbott

by sn0wballz on Jun 23, 2009 9:55 AM EDT reply actions  

Steel sharpens Steelers

Looking forward to Sept. 10th. and the contest of two of the six top teams in the AFC. I believe this game a portent for the season and I’m hoping for the STEELERS in a walk, but more likely a battle Royale. I’m seeing this as the year Ben exibits his ability to the naysayers.
The Titans and the Ravens are going to test the STEELERS like they did last year and I look for a 14 & 2 season and Mike Tomlin to have to walk past seven Lombardi trophys every day.

Sea Bee

by Heckers on Jun 23, 2009 10:14 AM EDT reply actions  

Injuries and Fatigue and Gay

Yep that is what will determine the season for the Steelers, can they excape the battles not only with a W but with very little injuries also. What is equally as important is what if we happen to be fighting for a playoff spots week 17 and then have to turn around and play that week. That will make another superbowl run more daunting. Like in 05. I feel like if William Gay can hold up too we’ll be good. But if we can get that bye week either one of them, we’ll be fresh and ready to go in da playoffs. I dont mind injuries just injuries where we can afford them lol.

by tannofsteel84 on Jun 23, 2009 10:19 AM EDT reply actions  

Anyone else?

Looking forward to that Titans game? Ever since they disgraced the Terrible Towel I have been looking forward to pay back. Those jackals have it coming. Its going to be a great game.

Also, if it comes down to week 17 I am confident we can beat the Dolphins. As I’ve said before their offense is a joke/gimmick that cannot stand up against good defenses. I wouldn’t be surprised if we beat them by 20.

by John Stephens on Jun 23, 2009 10:23 AM EDT reply actions  

Most offenses are jokes that cannot stand up against good defenses. I know ours can’t.

Don't worry about the haters. Haters only hate.

by steelguy99 on Jun 23, 2009 10:52 AM EDT up reply actions  

I'd argue against that in part.

We did beat Baltimore three times. One time when our O marched down the field in the last few minutes to win the game.

by John Stephens on Jun 23, 2009 1:23 PM EDT up reply actions  

I didn’t say “most offenses never score a single touchdown against good defenses,” so I’m not sure what point you are trying to make. We won that game 13-9, and if 13 points is your definition for our offense standing up to a good defense…then I don’t even know why I bother arguing.

Our offense came through when it counted, their defense did not. I’m pretty sure that if our offense was actually doing at all reasonably well though that they wouldn’t have to make a last minute game winning drive.

Don't worry about the haters. Haters only hate.

by steelguy99 on Jun 23, 2009 1:28 PM EDT up reply actions  

No, but my idea of a good offense is one that puts you in a position to win the game. It does not matter whether you win by 50 or 1. A ‘W’ is a ‘W’.

by John Stephens on Jun 23, 2009 2:38 PM EDT up reply actions  

Also, the AFC championship game where we nearly put up 300 yards on them

by John Stephens on Jun 23, 2009 2:41 PM EDT up reply actions  

To construe a 13 point game as anything but the defense putting you in a position to win is anything but correct.

I believe we would have won game 3 anyhow, but Baltimore was a broken team at that point. They were running on fumes and while I appreciate Tomlin’s sentiment that expectations do not change, when you are missing close to half your starting defense, you are going to suffer.

Don't worry about the haters. Haters only hate.

by steelguy99 on Jun 23, 2009 3:05 PM EDT up reply actions  

I also like the cowboys game where the offense set up the defense to get the game winning touchdown. Well-played Ben and Arians.

Don't worry about the haters. Haters only hate.

by steelguy99 on Jun 23, 2009 3:07 PM EDT up reply actions  

Obviously you have to play both sides of the ball to win the game. But the defense did not march us some 80 yards down the field in the 4th quarter or score the 7 points that gave us the lead. The defense played tremendous that game, but with out the offenses last minute heroics their performance would have been all for naught.

And if Lewis, Reed, Scott, Suggs, and Ngata are still playing their defense is pretty intact.

by John Stephens on Jun 23, 2009 3:57 PM EDT up reply actions  

You can’t make a defense with 5 guys, and suggs was playing with one arm and frequently came out.

The defense has a hard time winning the game outright, but I don’t think the defense is asking too much when it requires 1 touchdown a game. If that’s your definition of an offense owning a good defense, then I can see why you are so enamored with our current setup.

Don't worry about the haters. Haters only hate.

by steelguy99 on Jun 23, 2009 4:03 PM EDT up reply actions  

Thanks for realizing that

We had our 5th and 6th CB’s lining up on Ward and Holmes along with our 3rd string safeties. We had a our 3rd string tight end playing DE/OLB and we did not have Kelly Gregg.

Gonna be great match-ups this year for sure.

You have to hate losing more than you love winning.

by Mr MaLoR on Jun 23, 2009 5:17 PM EDT up reply actions  

Sweed’s best showing all year was destroying your last remaining hope for CBs.

Don't worry about the haters. Haters only hate.

by steelguy99 on Jun 23, 2009 7:27 PM EDT up reply actions  

Well

Corey Ivy is a Brown now, so go ahead and do what ever you want with him.

You have to hate losing more than you love winning.

by Mr MaLoR on Jun 23, 2009 7:53 PM EDT up reply actions  

Ward got injured very early in that game. So lining up much of anyone against him was suffice.

Steelerguy99 you are stretching everything I say. I said a good offense is one that, if the game is in balance, puts you in a position to win it in the end. What is the one stat everyone raved about associated with Ben last year? He made game winning drives in the 4th. That’s huge. I’d rather have that then a Phillip Rivers or Drew Brees any sunday.

And I am not “enamored” with our current setup. I, along with any Steelers’ fan, am not comfortable with our O line. However, I do not believe our offense is as terrible as everyone thinks it is. We had no running game last year, even when FWP was “healthy”. Moore was our best back last year. This year we should have Parker and Mendenhall 100%, with Moore and hopefully Summers to back them. No Davis or Russell to come in for crap runs/returns. That will be a tremendous up start to a rush offense that did not exist last year.

Additionally, we WILL have a return game this year, that did not exist last year until Holmes took kicks/punts in the playoffs. With Wallace coming in, we will have a huge advantage that did not exist last year. Speaking of special teams, with Sepulveda we also will have punting this year! So we can forget those 20- yards punts and give our defense room to work with. I think it goes without saying that special teams was bad last year.

So am I enamored with the possibilities, yes. We won the superbowl with two shaky components of the game and this spotty O line. That’s something to be enamored about.

by John Stephens on Jun 24, 2009 9:10 AM EDT up reply actions  

I never got upset

About the Terrible Towel stomping. Yes, it’s classless by the athlete, but who really cares. Because we’ve had a rock solid coaching staff and front office for 30+ years, our players never seemed to need any motivation. They rarely come unprepared. And if I was a player, I’d care nothing about that incident.

I do however, look forward to the game. I think Fisher is a good guy and a very good coach. Having plenty of time to prepare, I expect this game to be a tough battle. It will be a great way to start the season, beating the last team to defeat us and the AFC’s best record in ’08.

Nice posting Blitz, a good read indeed. I love the mid season bye week also.

by jharmon64 on Jun 23, 2009 1:38 PM EDT up reply actions  

Denver: Ryan Clark....

He’s become deathly ill up there the last two times he’s played there….

Last time, he had his spleen removed.

Something about the altitude and a physical problem he has. Scary.

by Homer J. on Jun 23, 2009 10:47 AM EDT reply actions  

he has sickle cell trait. often ppl when in times of physical stress go through an “episode.” the high altitude happens to bring on his episodes & thats actually how he was diagnosed.

by t1mmy10 on Jun 23, 2009 12:20 PM EDT up reply actions  

I wouldn't be one bit surprised

to see the Steelers at 2-2 after the first 4 games. Titans, Bears, Chargers will be very tough games. However, the rest of the season doesn’t look to terribly tough. 11-13 wins I think is well within reach.

Why should I change my name? He's the one that sucks!

by NoCal-SteelCity on Jun 23, 2009 11:53 AM EDT reply actions  

Yay

Fearless Leader is back!!

by Michael Uhlhorn on Jun 23, 2009 2:08 PM EDT reply actions  

yup yup

been awhile.

Freel free to email me anytime at behindthesteelcurtain@gmail.com with questions, suggestions, complaints, etc, or to just say what's up. -Michael Bean (Blitz)

by Michael Bean on Jun 23, 2009 3:04 PM EDT up reply actions  

There is nothing scary about the Bears

The defense is down. Cutler is almost as overrated as Romo and has 0 WRs to bail him out. Shut down Forte and we should roll.

by chanman on Jun 23, 2009 3:32 PM EDT reply actions  

in the burgh i'd completely agree

but at soldier field, it’s a different story. the steelers are obviously the better team, but home field advantage at soldier field is definitely a factor. at least it won’t be winter yet….

Why should I change my name? He's the one that sucks!

by NoCal-SteelCity on Jun 23, 2009 3:49 PM EDT up reply actions  

One thing about the schedule that hasn't been mentioned

While it won’t be objectively as difficult as last year’s, it will, nonetheless, be a ‘bullseye’ schedule. Every team will have the Steelers game circled in red. Season’s can be made, reputation’s enhanced, jobs saved if you can knock off the Champs. Teams playing ‘over their heads’ can be expected. The mental discipline the team showed this past year will be essencial to their success this year. It will be fascinating to see if Tomlin and Co. can successfully maintain focus this year.

by Ivan Cole (RickVa) on Jun 23, 2009 6:39 PM EDT reply actions  

good point good sir

I think that maybe gets overblown though a bit. In a short 16-game schedule where all the teams are so close to each other really, each and every game means the world to teams. At least those with any sort of heart and backbone that have anything at all to play for in their season.

Freel free to email me anytime at behindthesteelcurtain@gmail.com with questions, suggestions, complaints, etc, or to just say what's up. -Michael Bean (Blitz)

by Michael Bean on Jun 23, 2009 7:15 PM EDT up reply actions  

I think this will show up in the division games. Last year we were all beat up, this year with easier out of division schedule I think we’ll see Bengals Ravens and Steelers in the running for the division. That will mean nasty tough games, but at least the Browns will still suck.

by Phantaskippy on Jun 25, 2009 10:31 AM EDT up reply actions  

Here's the way i look at it

I put in the W’s as games i think the Steelers “should” win and put the games in ? for games i am scared of.

Steelers schedule:

Titans W
@ Bears W
@ Bengals W
Chargers ?
@ Lions W
Browns W
Vikings ? (With Brett Favre)
BYE
@ Broncos W
Bengals W
@ Chiefs W
@ Ravens ?
Raiders W
@ Browns W
Packers W
Ravens W
@ Dolphins W

Of course, anything can happen with injuries and the usual WTF? of a regular season in the NFL, which is why i watch every single minute of every single game because you never really know. But, if the core players are healthy i’ve got them penciled in with 13 games that we “should” win.

Tennesse week 1 totally goes in our favor. We haven’t lost a season opener in years and since the NFL decided to have the Super Bowl winner open up the season on Thursday night football, the host has never lost that game. You add in the whole Terrible Towel fiasco, no Haynesworth and no more D coordinator, i’m gonna have quite a bit of $$$ on that game.

10 days rest for week 2 will help against the Bears. We “should” win that game.

Cincy might give us a game…..In the first half…I’m not drinking the Cincy kool-aid yet.

San Diego game scares me. I think we’re gonna see the team we saw 2 years ago with Merriman back.

Vikings game i think will be a possible Super Bowl preview. With Brett Favre there at Qb, i think that team is going to be a force in the NFC.

I think you made a good point about the Miami game but, after seeing what the Ravens did to them in the playoffs last year, and the fact that the Ravens game the week prior is at home, i think that is a game we, once again, “should” win.

by Freddyd on Jun 23, 2009 7:34 PM EDT reply actions  

the biggest concern is focus

I’m sure I’m not the only one thinking this, but this is a pretty easy schedule. The Titans game will be tough, but other than that the only games that concern me are the Chargers game and the two against Baltimore. And even those are very winnable. The Chargers always play poorly to start the season, it’s week 4, and we have them at home. And I could see Baltimore coming down to earth a bit this year: the losses of Rex Ryan and Bart Scott will hurt their defense, which will put more pressure on Flacco. They’re still good, but I’m not sure they’re as good as they were last year.

Otherwise? The Vikings are a dangerous team, but I’d be more worried if we had to play them in Minnesota. The Bears have potential, but they seem to be perennially execution-challenged. And my thoughts on this year’s Dolphins are the same as my thoughts on last year’s Browns: let’s see how good they are against a tougher schedule. I don’t see Miami dropping back to 1-15, but I wouldn’t be surprised by 7-9.

Other than the obvious staying-healthy thing, the biggest challenge for the Steelers will be the bullseye on their collective back. They’re good enough to win these games, but they’ll have to stay focused and not look past anyone. If nothing else, you need to be able to bring your A-game come playoff time, and the best way to do that is by practicing it during the regular season.

P is for Latrobe.

by holiday park on Jun 24, 2009 10:57 AM EDT reply actions  

Ok a little late but here goes

Titans W
@ Bears W
@ Bengals W
Chargers W
@ Lions W
Browns W
Vikings W
BYE
@ Broncos W
Bengals W
@ Chiefs W
@ Ravens L
Raiders W
@ Browns W
Packers W
Ravens W
@ Dolphins W

If health is on our side this year this is a very real possibility. I don’t want to hear this crap about the Bengals. Sure I’ll admit they are improving but 1: Limited to no Running Game. 2. Great Draft on Paper but they picked about 3 HIGH Risk players that could fall flat on their faces. 3. The Bengal’s defense is not gonna give us nightmares. They made some nice off season additions but correct me if I’m wrong, I’m pretty sure that out of our two meetings last year I think Ben might have hit the ground 2 or 3 times all after the ball was away. I’m pretty sure the Bengals didn’t register a single sack against us all year. 4. I’d be surprised if we lose a game to Cinci or Cleveland, because if it does happen it means we shot ourselves in the foot real badly. I know we know them and they know us but I find it real hard to see us dropping a game to them.

The only way I see us dropping one against the Bears is if we lose it ourselves. Jay Cutler can play but as of right now who do the Bears have on their offense; Matt Forte and Greg Olsen. Ok, so that’s taken care of. I have a lotta respect for Forte, but he and Cutler are not enough to top the Steelers. The Bears Defense has some names but they are by no means unbeatable, so I see us taking that one.

Against the Vikings, Brett Favre will only be a factor if he’s not in the game. Without him I don’t see anyone that’s gonna light up the defending number 1 defense. Even with Favre, I’m not worried. That game will be won with ease if we control the time of possession. The Vikings are a team on the rise but have a lotta holes.

Health willing, I say our record is looking like14-2. I think we’ll lose one by our own mistakes somewhere along the line, as most teams do now and then, which will keep the naysayers talking and our egos in check. I can see that happening against Tennessee or San Diego, maybe Minnesota or Cincinnati, but only one of those. I say we drop a close won to the Ravens in either Baltimore or Da Burgh, to, again, keep ourselves in reality land.

That’s all I have for now, but I’ll probably end up posting a final, complete season preview before the season starts.

It's true what they say...Even the NFL's Big Wigs hate the Steelers. On the plus side, I can now tell my future grand kids about Hines Ward and how the NFL made rules because of him. Roger Goodell, you make me sick.

by Tim Mullhaupt (HSS) on Jun 28, 2009 11:27 PM EDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to BTSC, a blog dedicated to the SIX-time world champion Steelers.

"Thoughtful discussion with a sense of history."

Art Rooney Jr.

"Level-headed thinking." Pittsburgh Post-Gazette

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Franco72_small
The Last Sunday
Small
Joe Greene on Steelers Offense Under BA
Small
Homer reps BTSC and Steeler Nation on Washington Post Front Page
Small
Your Super Bowl Hate Guide

Recent FanPosts

Small
Who are your Top 5 Steelers of all time?
Steel-ball-logo-poster_small
Knowing Your Guards: A look at the 2012 Prospects (Updated 2/11/12)
Rodthreerivers_small
Report: Steelers Don't Want Ward
Small
Analyzing the Steelers 2008 Draft
Small
My Top 11 Prospects for our First Round Pick
Small
Ike Taylor restructures, over 18 million in cap space created so far this offseason
Small
Analyzing the Steelers 2009 Draft
Small
6 Round NFL Mock Draft
Steeler_small
Steelers Cut Their Salary Problem in Half
Small
Woodley restructures contract

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Terrible Towel Talk

Listen to internet radio with Michael Bean on Blog Talk Radio


Site Founder & Editor

Imag0299_small Michael Bean

Steelers Historian

Steeler_small maryrose

Bison_small Neal Coolong

Contributing Authors

Small Ivan Cole (RickVa)

Franco72_small 5020

Btsc_head_shot_small Rebecca Rollett

Small big_jay71

Stogs_small John Stephens

178896_499126548441_596563441_5939410_7960015_n_small Anthony Defeo