Behind the Steel Curtain: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
Around SBN: Spencer Hall's Sports Meme Power Rankings

Max Starks Signs Long Term Deal With Pittsburgh Steelers - What It Means Moving Forward

It's not often that us fans get legitimately substantial news stories this time of year. We got one today when it was reported that offensive tackle Max Starks inked a four-year contract extension. As reported by ESPN, the contract is worth roughly $26.3 million over the next four years, with $10 million dollars of guaranteed money for the two-time Super Bowl winning tackle out of the University of Florida. Congratulations to Max Starks on the deal.

What does it mean though exactly for him and for the organization moving forward though? Let's try to break it down a bit after the jump.

Maxstarks_medium

Star-divide

I don't have all the answers, so perhaps it might be a better idea to just lay out some of what I feel are the more pertinent questions directly and indirectly affected by the signing.

  1. Who's Next? At the outset of the 2009 offseason, Steelers fans were curious about what the organization might and might not do with some of its higher profile players. Well, Hines Ward inked an extension just days before the Draft; then Defensive Player of the Year James Harrison signed a new deal that will likely keep him in Pittsburgh for the remainder of his career; finally, the Steelers were able to work out a long term deal with Max Starks. By doing so, the organization will free up salary cap space in 2009. Instead of paying Starks over $8 million in 2009, the Steelers will be on the books for several million less. And what might the organization do with that money? Re-sign another impact player scheduled to be a free agent at the end of this coming season? Perhaps so. Potential candidates include tight end Heath Miller, kicker Jeff Reed, free safety Ryan Clark, defensive end Brett Keisel. That's but a few of the now 26 players set to be free agents at the end of this year.

  2. Is The Time Now? You often hear the phrase 'building for the future' from organizations. Even teams that are committed to fielding a competitive product each year -  like the Steelers - must think about the long-term financial implications of each and every decision. That often requires sacrificing in the short term for the sake of longer term stability and success. Well, as it stands now for Pittsburgh, at least from where I'm sitting, the time seems to be now to making the investments necessary to retain key players for the immediate future. By agreeing to a long-term deal with Starks, the Steelers have retained the services of arguably their best offensive lineman. Depending on how Willie Colon and Tony Hills develop, the Steelers may be in a bit of trouble two or three years down the road at the tackle position, but it also means that the organization has at least ensured that it can devote its resources to other important positions while knowing they have locked down a more than serviceable option at one of the game's most important positions - left tackle.

  3. How does Starks' Deal Stack Up? Good question. We don't know yet the specifics of the deal, but let's just say for simplicity's sake that the deal is essentially worth $6.5 million per year over the course of the next four years. If you look at this database of offensive linemen salaries from 2008, you'll notice that Starks will be making about what he deserves in 2009 - somewhere in the top 15-25 range of salaries among all OL. When you consider that 2010 will not have a salary cap and that salaries will likely continue to escalate that year and in the following years, then one has to feel good about the price that Starks was retained at. Another way to look at it is that if the Steelers had not worked something out with Starks, he would have been extremely difficult to retain for 2010 after this season once he hit the market again. In fact, the Steelers probably would have had to slap a 'tag' on him for the third consecutive year - a decision that would have carried financial implications. Bottom line is the Steelers probablly got away with a steal of a deal here. Starks could have easily refused to accept that deal, taken his ~$8 million this year and then inked a deal either in Pittsburgh or elsewhere after this season that had as much, if not more, guaranteed money than what he accepted this season.

  4. Will Starks Stay Hungry? There have been plenty of motivating forces in Max Starks' football life this past two seasons. First it was getting snubbed in favor of Willie Colon during the 2007 season, despite the fact that Starks was more experienced, more talented and perfectly healthy. Then he started the 2008 season on the bench after filling in nicely for Marvel Smith later in the 2007 season. This was after being slapped with the Transition Tag last year - a move that did of course pay him nicely, but also muddled his future financial security as he entered the prime of his career. Finally, he gets the Franchise Tag placed on him this offseason and proceeded to watch teammates James Harrison and Hines Ward get new deals - transactions that signaled that the organization still might not have Stakrs in their long term plans. Anyway, now that Starks has some security, will he work as hard and be as focused as he's been the past two years? Work ethic was not his strong suit early on in his career - a reality that probably has kept him from developing in to the type of player he has until just now rather than a few years ago. Will he remain hungry knowing he's got at least 8 digits in the bank and no real candidate to take his job anywhere on the roster? I sure hope so.

  5. What's Pittsburgh's New Cap Situation? Good question and that's where you come in. It might be a good time for us to get an updated tally of what the Steelers' salary cap situation is now that a number of the rookies have signed and now that Starks' 2009 cap hit has been lowered.

Those are just a few of my thoughts on the subject. I'd love to hear your feedback as well as any other pertinent questions you think are in play after hearing about Starks' new contract.

-Michael B.-

0 recs  |  Comment 39 comments  |  Add comment |

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

Great Analysis

as usual Blitz. Here is what I think about some of the questions you pose;
1) Jeff Reed and Heath Miller are now the two most important FA that the Steelers have to think about. Don’t know what the 5 highest TE or K make but they could sign these guys or tag them. They are both important.
2) The time is now to win another championship. Ben is entering his prime. They have a stout ( no Cliff references pleas) defense. They are up against the cap. They will continue to invest in the future through the draft. They could still use a T, S and NT. For Pittsburgh the time is always now to contend for a Lombardi.
3) Starks deal is great for Pittsburgh as he has a manageable number for a LT. It is also good for Max as he has security and obviously wanted to stay in Pittsburgh or he would have played for the 8 million and tested the waters in 10.
4) I hope Max learned his lesson and will stay hungry and continue to develop. He has the genes. He has the experience. He has 2 rings. Now hopefully he has Ben’s back for 4 years.

When You Run The Ball Good Things Happen

by 5020 on Jun 23, 2009 7:17 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Robbing w/o a mask

We robbed Max, the profootballtalk.com called in a ski-mask maneuver. We robbed him w/o a gun, mask, or any accomplices. I truly feel we are paying him below value. Plus he is the best lineman we have.

I’m still stuck on Stapleton and Colon getting beat by linemen running X stunts. The first stunts you learn in peewee football as a 7 yr old

by 72Steeler on Jun 23, 2009 8:26 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

If Max felt it was a crappy deal his second option was very lucrative. I’m not exactly sure how you rob someone who agrees to be robbed, but that’s profootball talk for you.

Don't worry about the haters. Haters only hate.

by steelguy99 on Jun 24, 2009 8:03 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

+1

I'll drink your Milkshake, I'll drink it up!

by drinkyourmilkshake on Jun 24, 2009 8:54 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

sheesh 26 mil? i'd love to be robbed for 500k!

even 500 bucks would be nice. someone rob me some money please!

by SteelersVT on Jun 24, 2009 11:40 AM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

Will Max Starks stay hungry?

That’s what I’m afraid of.

I do think it was competition for a starting job that kept Max in trim shape for a big guy. When he got bigger in 06 he got slow. That’s one of the reasons he was benched for Colon. He came back in fantastic shape last year, and I hope that trend continues. But my biggest concern with this deal is he grows a bit lazy. I hope Tony Hills can push him, if not this year, then next.

by syrsteelerfan on Jun 23, 2009 10:39 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Mad Max

watch any of the sideline footage of the SuperBowl and you will notice what a leader Max has become. So I think He has matured into a pro.

by BLACK STEEL on Jun 23, 2009 11:26 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Starks Market

I have found myself very muddled over the Steelers handling of Starks. He appears to be the beneficiary of Pittsburgh’s roster challenges along the O-line. Last year’s “Transitional Tag” on Starks seemed more out of necessity, then from the conviction that he is a valuable asset—and must be retained even at “Transition Tag” prices. The “Franchise” marker this offseason was obviously more to avoid what would happen if Starks left, then based on what franchise changing contribution the LT might make. So, when we say we got Starks for a steal, might we be falling into the trap of assuming a player is worth retaining at his inflated “tagged” price? Inevitably his new contract numbers will seem modest in comparison. The truth, however, might be that Starks’ contract either reflects his actual value (and, therefore, is not a steal), or could even prove to be an overestimate of what #78 will contribute over the next 4 years…

by paddy-o-furniture on Jun 24, 2009 1:57 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

It’s not that he the Steelers are getting a steal because they are paying less than the Franchise price, it’s that they are getting a steal because two time Super Bowl winning tackle is going to command a lot more than the 6 mill per year we just locked him up for.

I'll drink your Milkshake, I'll drink it up!

by drinkyourmilkshake on Jun 24, 2009 7:26 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Indeed. Tackles aren’t cheap. If you want a starting left tackle, you’re going to pay.

Don't worry about the haters. Haters only hate.

by steelguy99 on Jun 24, 2009 8:05 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Not to mention

He is particularly valuable to the Steelers because of their question marks at RT. If Starks leaves, the Steelers would be in the tough position of trying to groom an LT and an RT simultaneously (hopefully Willie Colon is not the long term RT answer).

by CarlWeathersMustache on Jun 24, 2009 8:21 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Excellent deal for both

Obviously it’s a good deal for the Steelers. They finally end the tag game with Max and lock up the most important position on the O-line for four years, while also clearing cap space immediately for another player. There is also now a fixed amount of time in which to draft and/or develop his eventual successor. I think it’s also a good deal for Max. He gets more guaranteed money than he would have received under the franchise tag, which while lucrative provided no security for the future. Another factor is his age. This deal is going to allow him to become a free agent at just 31 years old. If he’s motivated to prove himself an elite LT — or, even better, if he’s forced to improve by competition from Hills or a future draft pick — then it’s a win-win situation for both sides.

by steeler.lifer on Jun 24, 2009 2:28 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Congrats to Max. Couldn’t happen to a better guy. I think he will be a solid left tackle for years to come.

by PensFanCap on Jun 24, 2009 9:09 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Agree with steeler.lifer on Max

Max signed a deal that is good for the Steelers and good for him. Max pocketed $10M in the bank yesterday as his wedding day approaches, can earn $26M during the next four years and probably more than that if he hits all of his contract incentives (Pro Bowls, Super Bowls, etc). Don’t forget the millions he pocked this past year with the transition tag.

For the Steelers, it allows them to continue to compete for championships while this window is open. Starks still has upside and has shown to be a better LT than RT. And you now have your 2-time winning QB and LT under contract for the next four years.

This also gives the Steelers the opportunity to continue to rebuild their OL and find their linemen of the future. Maybe players like Hills, Urbik, R. Foster, Shipley or etc. will be a part of that line, or maybe not. It’s good to see another one of the Steelers own draft picks rewarded for their play. It sends a positive message to the rest of the team that when the Steelers select you, and then you perform, they will make the effort to re-sign you. Players won’t break the bank here, but you will be taken care of (Big Ben is the exception on breaking the bank) and will have the opportunity to compete for championships.

Now, it’s on to Heath, Reed, Clark, and then Keisel & Big Snack. I think the handwriting is on the wall for FWP. I wouldn’t be surprised if Keisel inks something that will be a hometown discount. As for Snack, unless he gives a discount, I’d let him play out the year. I think the team would benefit greatly from a hungry Big Snack.

by datruth4life on Jun 24, 2009 12:13 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Any ideas on what Reed deserves?

Not just from you, truth, but the whole crowd: What is Reed worth, and what should the Steelers sign him for?

I think he’s money, and I wouldn’t want anyone else kicking at Heinz Field, but there are cons, as well, in his relatively short kickoff, and his spotty track record at long figgies (69% 40-49yds, 54.5% 50+ yds).

Did you know: Jeff Reed has 14 career solo ST tackles?

Guns don't kill people. Lamar Woodley kills people.

by BostonWahoo on Jun 24, 2009 12:24 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Kris Brown (remember him)

was resigned by the Texans last week for $10 million over 4-years. I’d say Skippy shouldn’t and won’t sign for any less.

There is no spoon

by chewiesteeler on Jun 24, 2009 12:38 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Fair enough. But $2.5 mil/yr (or thereabouts) is not too much to ask for such consistency at home. But I should hope he wont get any more than that.

Guns don't kill people. Lamar Woodley kills people.

by BostonWahoo on Jun 24, 2009 1:21 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

it's not always about the biggest dollars

10 million guaranteed is huge security, plus staying with a winning organization, and a host of other intangibles.
There are many who think the uncapped year will mean fiscal lunacy, but I think the economy in general if it continues to limp along or worsens, may rein in free agent spending more than a cap would.

by vherub on Jun 24, 2009 12:19 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Let me just say

YIPPEEE! I was really hoping they’d get this done. Phew.

by Chicago Steeler on Jun 24, 2009 12:34 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Cap situation in regards to item number 5

I’ve been trying to keep tabs on the Steelers cap situation. According to this site ,
PIT is sitting at about 118 million. The cap is 127 million.

I currently have the Steelers at about 119 million as I’ve been reading that Starks’ new contract is saving close to 2 million so his cap figure would be closer to 6.5 million than the 5.5 million they have listed at that site. That 119 million includes the top 51 current salaries plus the approximately 10 million still on the books for Mahan, Simmons and Foote.

by King Coebra on Jun 24, 2009 2:12 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

What about the extension for the coach?

That’s an additional signing I’d like to see.

by datruth4life on Jun 24, 2009 2:36 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

I like the signing

I know that a lot of people on this site have had no use for Starks (or any of the current crop of O-linemen). I for one have been continually puzzled by why. IMHO he has been nothing but a quality player with little of the downside that his replacement at RT has shown. This move creates a mental cornerstone around which the O-line can build in the coming few years. We really haven’t had that since Jeff Hartings retired, given the contract and injury situations involving Faneca and M. Smith. With the experience and confidence gained through the championship run and the maturation of the younger players the O-line could become quite good in faster time frame than we might expect.

As for the other potential FAs. Let’s not take Reed for granted. He has been remarkably steady and consistent over the years playing on a field (Heinz) that generally speaking is Hell on kickers. He has been the one constant bright spot in special teams play. I also don’t take the fact that he was voted a team captain lightly. Kickers aren’t often accorded that honor. Don’t necessary rate him above Miller, but not below him either. In all other cases the jury is still out. For example, I don’t necessarily extend Keisel or Hampton until we see what we’ve got in camp in terms of competition (in the case of Keisel) or Snack comes to camp in good shape. With all due respect to datruth, If FWP stays healthy and puts up Pro Bowl caliber numbers it would be crazy to write him off. Especially if Mendenhall and Co. aren’t doing much better.

by RickVa on Jun 24, 2009 6:55 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

number 6

Will we ever learn why he got benched? Willie? Really?

WB Blizt!

by SteelBuckeye on Jun 24, 2009 7:51 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

thanks sir

Freel free to email me anytime at behindthesteelcurtain@gmail.com with questions, suggestions, complaints, etc, or to just say what's up. -Michael Bean (Blitz)

by Blitzburgh on Jun 24, 2009 9:01 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Max Starks -- Work Ethic is the best on the team

For the record, anyone that questions Max’s work ethic is either in the closet reading sports or has his or her head under a pillow. Look at his career as an individual in school, sports, community and family. Every single year that Max’s has reported for camp he reported in top shape, as he would spend his own dime and trained for three months out in the desert in Arizonia. Even when he was benched he did not give into the naysay talk and he kept his spirits in tact, and hired a great life coach to make sure that he made his coaches “terrbile” decision turn into the best decision for him. Every single time he has prove the sports writers from high school, college and now the NFl wrong. And anyone that question his work ethic is an idiot.

by Sportsmavericks on Jun 25, 2009 10:31 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Don't worry about the haters. Haters only hate.

by steelguy99 on Jun 25, 2009 10:48 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Max Starks is working for another Ring or the Pro Ball --- That is his motivation this year --- Vote!!!!

Who is 27. graduate from college with honors, on the board of the symphony, in the leaque, destine to play with same team until he is 31, with 2 Super Bowl Rings? Max Starks. What is next for him? Max is getting married this weekend. So marriage and kids. Max has signed a long-term contract with the Steelers, that has eluded him since he became a free agent two year ago. Max has earned everything that he has gotten, but he also understands the NFL is not for long. So he is trying to Maximize his years while he is earning large sums of money by investing well, and also givning back to the community. Last year he attended the NFL Broadcasting School (chosing from a few); Northwestern and Stanford Continuing MBA program the years before. Yes he graduate from Florida with honors inspite of a professor who wouldn’t give him a grade so that his degree would be conferred. So what did he do to set the record straight? Max went back to school on his off day, practice two a days and put up with all the bull that come from being benched for a less skill player ,to winning his rightful position on the line. Now you know 77, was his Florida number — Maybe the Steelers would considered post the draft award him that number (Smile) But the only thing that has eluded Max is the Pro-Bowl… now nation it is up to you.

by Sportsmavericks on Jun 25, 2009 10:45 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Yes he graduate from Florida with honors inspite of a professor who wouldn’t give him a grade so that his degree would be conferred

Sounds like you know an awful lot about Max Starks. I am guessing you either

1) Went to school with Max at Florida
2) Are related to Max
3) Are Max

If it is #3, welcome to BTSC. You’re much more eloquent than najeh was.

Don't worry about the haters. Haters only hate.

by steelguy99 on Jun 25, 2009 10:51 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I should say, if it’s #2 or #1, also…welcome to BTSC.

Don't worry about the haters. Haters only hate.

by steelguy99 on Jun 25, 2009 10:52 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Sportswriters and Max Starks

This has been a love hate relationship mostly with sportswriters. Max does not fit the stereo-type player that they love to destroy. Max is intelligent, humble and a killer on the field. Max was too big to play football until he went to college so he was not a Pee Wee Footballer or Pop Warner. Max came out of nowhere and made his name. And he didn;t learned about his famous football family until he was 17, and inspite of all that scrutiny he is 27 with two Super Bowl Rings. Willie Parker contributes his rise in the 2006 Suoer Bowl to Max’s action on the field, but the press gave it to Fanaca Who? the cry baby is long gone and he should have just been more humble and waited for another ring. Santonio also contribute Max’s blocking to his rise in the Super Bowl. Remember when FAnaca; Simmons and Smoth went down — Max was the senior person on the o-Line and he was the only one that had ever won a Super Bowl. Pittsburgh baby!! He carried the momentum and he set the pace for that game. You should be sending him flowers.
Sportswriter are always looking for sensationalism.. Max just give you consistent best….
Why don’t you write about that? Also why was he benched? You never wrote the truth. it was not his ablity, it was his agent status — tenuous so they thought they needed to develop new talent that wouldn’t leave. Asked Willie Colon who help him with his assignments. Who is always helping the Rookies to adjust. Not the quarterback. i can quarantee you that.

by Sportsmavericks on Jun 25, 2009 10:58 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

  1. Creepy cult follower of the Church of Starks

Don't worry about the haters. Haters only hate.

by steelguy99 on Jun 25, 2009 11:00 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Er,

4) Creepy cult follower of the Church of Starks

Don't worry about the haters. Haters only hate.

by steelguy99 on Jun 25, 2009 11:01 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Sportsmavericks and Max Starks

Max is on our board and we love him. We just completed a weekend of Max’s All Star Champions in Orlando. The is a program called “Character in Action.” Max started the program to extend his brand to the community beyond just sports. Over 300 kids and their parents gathered at the Downtown Recreational Center in Orlando for a pep rally on Characters Needed for Success. Parents and kids participated in the discussions and there were bands, cheerleaders, skits, old school music, fun,games and prizes. Message sent a televised message directly from the trophy room since he could not be there this year. "Character can be achieve by winning trophies. Character – It begins when you adopt the characters to succeed in life, school, community, family. Honesty, Integrity, Work Ethics, Team Work, Community, understanding and appreciation of diversity, Kindness, Charity, Leadership, etc. This was a great program and city officials as well as former NFL & NBA players attended along with Corporate Head. A pact was made with the community to conduct the program year round.

We know Max and we love him!!!!

by Sportsmavericks on Jun 25, 2009 11:10 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Clearly…You should make a fanpost all about Max Starks. I’m sure many here would love to hear what you know about him, which is obviously a lot. I do think you are misconstruing opinion, most people here have him as their favorite lineman.

But seriously, it would be cool if you could put something together about Max. You could probably just copy and paste what you have written here and it would contain more information than anyone ever knew about him, and we are a pretty obsessed bunch.

You can follow this link to create a new fanpost: http://www.sbnation.com/admin/entries/new?community_id=64&entry_type=FanPost

Here is an interesting recent fanpost: http://www.behindthesteelcurtain.com/2009/6/18/913369/the-dick-lebeau-effect-on-ben

It would provide a nice reference point for all-things-Max.

Don't worry about the haters. Haters only hate.

by steelguy99 on Jun 25, 2009 11:16 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Very Very happy

This is something I’ve been pulling for. I’m a big Maxamillion fan and I’m hoping he gets a good shot at switching back to RT. But if not its ok by me as I think he anchored left pretty good.

Good step forward and once again the FO does what nobody thinks possible

by Mechem on Jun 25, 2009 11:27 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

I think Max is a better LT than he is RT.

Don't worry about the haters. Haters only hate.

by steelguy99 on Jun 25, 2009 11:39 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs


User Tools

Welcome to BTSC, a blog dedicated to the SIX-time world champion Steelers.

"Thoughtful discussion with a sense of history."

Art Rooney Jr.

"Level-headed thinking." Pittsburgh Post-Gazette

Start posting about the Steelers »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
What players have you most wished could have been Steelers?
2196876391_dcb0380cb0_small
Okay. We need some fun!
Me_small
The BTSC Predict the Score Competition, Wk 11 @ KC Chiefs
J_page_small
Talk Chiefs with AP
Miketomlin-200_small
A look to 2005 and back to the present

Recent FanPosts

Steelers_small
This One's OnThe Coach
Steelers-logo1_small
Why Tomlin don't fire the worst 2 coordinators in Steelers history?
Jester_small
A glimmer of hope
Ward_small
"That's just bad football" - The Jamaal Charles KO Return
2940734199_1654fd3f61_small
Charlie Batch out for six weeks
Carl_20weathers_small
The Lawrence Timmons Situation
Steely-mcbeam_small
it's the coaching
Minuteman_small
I just can't help it
Small
Deshea Townsend
20090928033736804550000-gyi_small
Need Info on Kemo...

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Latest NFL Headlines from SB Nation

SPONSORS


Site Founder & Editor

Mbean_small Blitzburgh

Steelers Historian

Steeler_small maryrose

Bringing You Your Daily Six Pack

Plainview_small drinkyourmilkshake