The 12 Most Heartbreaking Playoff Losses In Pittsburgh Steelers History: #12 - #10
Yes, a series of articles talking about heartbreaking playoff losses is a painful journey down memory lane, but I figured now is the best time to take such a journey. With Steeler Nation still basking in Super Bowl glory, having snatched two Lombardis in four years, nothing can feel too bad these days. It is best to discuss the wounds of the past under the euphoria of the present.
This series will outline 12 heartbreaking playoff losses in Steelers' history, in reverse order from 12 to 1. The first two parts of the series will each address three games; the next two parts will each discuss two games and the final two parts will be devoted to single games, the runner-up and champion. Of course, these games and the order in which they are placed are purely arbitrary and in some ways, personal. Surely some will remember other games that they would replace on the list and for that matter, I am sure we would all have the list in different orders. That's great; that's what we're here to talk about.
Here we go, out of the box, numbers 12, 11 and 10...
#12 - 1989 Season: Broncos 24 Steelers 23
The Steelers were coming off a thrilling sudden-death win in the Wild Card game at Houston when Gary Anderson nailed a 50-yard field goal in overtime. It was Chuck Noll's last great win. Pittsburgh was not expected to hang with top-seeded Denver, but did so for the entire game at Mile High Stadium. Trailing by just one point with time running out, I can vividly see Bubby Brister's pass beautifully thrown to a guy named Mark Stock around the 50-yard line. All we needed was the great Gary Anderson, again, to get to the AFC Championship game. Stock drops the pass so well thrown it makes Jackie Smith's drop look like a circus catch. Season over. Stock, a 1988 graduate of Virginia Military never played before 1989 and never for the Steelers afterward, but his name will live in infamy in my memory. He became a much better man than football player, a commissioned U.S. Army officer in Operation Desert Storm and then later becoming a real estate guru. However on that day, we lost by one point.
1989 was one of Chuck Noll's finest years in coaching. The Steelers lost their opener, at home, to the Cleveland Browns by a score of 51-0. They lost the second game, 41-10 to Cincinnati. It would have been very easy for the season to go right in the tank, but Noll would not allow it. The Steelers avenged the Cleveland loss at Lake Erie and then won five of their last six games to sneak into the playoffs. They continually improved as the season wore on and became very dangerous in the end. Against Denver in the playoffs, the Steelers out rushed the Broncos badly, 175 yards to 138 yards; and out passed the Elway-led Denver team as well. Merril Hoge had the game of his life, racking up 120 yards on just 16 carries, while Pittsburgh dominated time-of- possession by nearly 10 minutes. Hoge also caught eight passes for 60 yards. The Broncos had no answer for him. Denver went on to easily beat Cleveland, and then was unmercifully smoked by San Francisco in the Super Bowl. Mark Stock, one point, sorry Merril.
Mark Stock Left the Steelers to Join Operation Desert Storm; Merril Hoge Almost Single-Handedly Beat the Broncos.
#11 - 1993 Season: Chiefs 27 Steelers 24 (ot)
Any overtime loss in the playoffs is automatically a heart breaker. What added some mustard to this one was the fact that the Steelers never trailed in this game until it was over. The Steelers didn't have an exceptional offence, but the defense, soon to be called "Blitzburgh," was starting to come into its own. Gerald Williams sacked Joe Montana three times and Pittsburgh led at half,17-7, and still led after three quarters, 17-10.
The six-seed in the tournament, the Steelers were looking good after Neil O'Donnell marched them 74 yards into the end zone in the middle of the fourth quarter, on a 22-yard pass to tight end Eric Green. Late in the game with Pittsburgh leading, by a touchdown, the Chief's Keith Cash blocked a Pittsburgh punt and Fred Jones returned it to the Steelers' nine-yard line. After gaining just two yards in three plays, Joe Montana hit Tim Barnett with a seven-yard touchdown to tie the game and send it to overtime. There Nick Lowrey kicked a 32-yarder to send the Steelers home. The Steelers lost a playoff game when one fourth-and-goal stop at the seven-yard line with just 1:43 remaining would have continued their season. The Buffalo Bills would defeat the Chiefs to represent the AFC in the Super Bowl. Earlier in the season, the Steelers demolished Buffalo, 23-0, on a Monday night.
Gerald Williams Sacked Joe Montana Three Times; Eric Green Caught a Huge Touchdown Pass
#10 - 2002 Season: Titans 34 Steelers 31 (ot)
After a thrilling come-from-behind win against Cleveland in the Wild Card game, the Steelers went on the road and played Tennessee toe-to-toe. After the Titans jumped to a 14-0 lead, the Steelers stormed back with four unanswered scores to lead 20-14. Tennessee answered with two touchdowns to lead 28-20, and then Pittsburgh scored twice to lead 31-28. The Titans kicked a field goal to send it in overtime. This game was really exciting because each team kept coming back. There was not a lot of defense. While neither team rushed for 100 yards, Tennessee racked up 430 yards to Pittsburgh's 324. Hines Ward scored two touchdowns for the Steelers while Steve McNair and Frank Wychek were trouble all day on the other side.
There is very little I dislike about the NFL. It is the fairest sports system on the planet. One of the few exceptions is the league's overtime format. We lost the game because we lost the coin toss. We never got the ball. Making matters worse, the Titans actually missed the 31-yard winning field goal and we should have gotten the ball, but a ticky-tack running into the kicker penalty by Dewayne Washington gave Tennessee yardage and another shot. Joe Nedney connected on a short 26-yarder and the game was over.
Sometimes the pain of a loss is heightened or reduced by how good future opponents are, at least in my mind. For example, that 1989 playoff loss would have eventually led to the San Francisco 49ers, a team who destroyed Denver with embarrassment. Yes, I would love to get there and yes, anything can happen, but reality tempers pain in my world. This particular year, the Titans next lost to the Raiders who next lost to the Buccaneers in the Super Bowl. In my mind, they were both extremely beatable. But who knows, maybe Tampa Bay's defensive backfield coach, Mike Tomlin, learned a thing or two about winning Super Bowls that would help him down the road.
Joe Nedney Earned His Way Into the Screen Actors Guild Hall of Fame; Hines Ward Showed Why He is a REAL Hall of Famer
0 recs |
55 comments
| Add comment
|
Comments
Great Discussion Topic
And a great start to the list, even if some of it brings up bad memories.
I have to disagree with your statement about why the Steelers lost the Tennessee game…“because we lost the coin toss.” Not quite. If you man-up and play some defense and force the opponent into a three and out, you should be giving the ball back to the offense in favorable field position. And whether or not the Steelers were playing good defense that day or not isn’t exactly relevent; the defense failed on that particular possession, and it went a long way in causing the loss. Saying that the game was lost purely because of the overtime rules just doesn’t hold a lot of water.
Sorry to be argumentative (again?!?), but it irks me when someone claims that an overtime game was lost because of the coin toss.
OK…back to the discussion at hand…
by Weegie on Jun 29, 2009 5:59 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Yeah I agree
Defense is part of the team. You have to play both sides of the ball. Regardless of what happened previously in the game, they should have/could have locked down and forced a 3 and out.
Statistically, its 50/50 on whether winning the coin toss actually wins you the game or not.
by Johnny_S on Jun 29, 2009 6:41 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
50/50? Not quite
If it were 50/50 the winner wouldn’t always choose to take offense first.
Statistically, since they changed the yard line you kick off from (improving average starting field position) I think the winner of the toss wins over 60% of the time.
by yrro on Jun 29, 2009 8:56 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
he's saying either team has a 50/50 chance to win the coin toss to get the advantage of choosing offense first
you’re right about the stat advantage of winning the coin toss tho. i think its 59% over the past 5 years
by t1mmy10 on Jun 30, 2009 11:41 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Should have put this in the original post
As the rule stands, it is fair only if teams are relatively balanced in terms of offense and defense. But we all know that isn’t how many teams play. During the rest of the game, if a team has a mediocre defense and an amazing offense, it is a perfectly valid strategy, and they can trade scores until they finally get one stop, and then win the game.
However, in overtime a team like this is suddenly drastically handicapped. Who cares that their offense has been rolling all day and the score is tied at 35-35, suddenly if they lose the coin toss their flawed defense is the only thing that matters.
As opposed to a team who plays amazing defense, who will still because of field positioning advantages choose to play offense first, but is not in as bad of a situation if they lose the coin toss. It strongly flavors one style of play over another in a way that the entire rest of the game does not, which seems a poor design. Two teams with high-powered offense who were evenly matched during the regular game now are almost entirely dependent on that coin flip.
by yrro on Jun 29, 2009 9:10 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I guess
thats why it pays to have a solid 3 phases of the game. Thats why I like it the way it is.
by Steelde#1 on Jun 30, 2009 7:30 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
yes, but the stance you're taking is mediocrity in all 3 phases is better than being awesome at 1, mediocre at 1, and bad at 1.
if the receiving team scores on their first possession, i think they should have to kickoff to the other team to give them a chance to tie it or win it. and it would then go to next point wins if the score was tied after each team had 1 possession.
that way, it takes care of the argument teams use saying their philosophy is our offense wins games and our defense just has to play ok. and if their defense lets up a touchdown & another score (so that they could’ve only tied the score after their first possession) then their defense is just too bad for their team to deserve the win….either that or their offense isn’t good enough to score the TD and get the 2 pt conversion for the win.
by t1mmy10 on Jun 30, 2009 1:16 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
but you're taking the stance that mediocrity in all 3 phases is better than being great at 1, mediocre at 1, and bad at 1
if the receiving team scores on their first possession, i think they should have to kickoff to the other team to give them a chance to tie it or win it. and it would then go to next point wins if the score was tied after each team had 1 possession.
that way, it takes care of the argument teams use saying their philosophy is our offense wins games and our defense just has to play ok. and if their defense lets up a touchdown & another score (so that they could’ve only tied the score after their first possession) then their defense is just too bad for their team to deserve the win….either that or their offense isn’t good enough to score the TD and get the 2 pt conversion for the win.
by t1mmy10 on Jun 30, 2009 1:17 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think the problem with being on a blog for an increasingly large amount of time is when I see a topic that was discussed at length a year ago come up again.
OT rules are a great point of argument though, carry on!
Don't worry about the haters. Haters only hate.
by steelguy99 on Jun 30, 2009 7:56 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I agree about the overtime rules, however.....
Nedney even said after the game that he should have been given an Oscar for his acting, which from that point on solidified my hatred for the Titans.
Though when Niel O’ Donnell was there I hated them as well.
Towel stomping did it for me last year.
Now I am even more geeked up about the home opener.
"Damnit mom! You almost ran over Greg Lloyd!"
at an autograph signing back in 95. He walked out in front of our minivan, and my mom almost hit him. He apologized.
by PA ARMY OFFICER on Jun 30, 2009 9:49 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
bittersweet memories
Damn. Good job on bringing up some painful memories, and doing it at such a time that is allows us to cherish what we have now.
And it’s been statistically proven that whatever team wins the coin-toss has a much greater chance of scoring and winning the game. Peter King sounds like a boring, old square some of the time, but he made a believer out of me on this subject.
by The King in Yellow (and black) on Jun 29, 2009 6:04 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I think the OT coin toss thing has become an Albatross. Yes you have a higher percentage chance to score on offense than on defense, but now it is so prevalent that the winner of the coin toss wins that I believe it gives a mental edge to the winning team, confidence they will win that is worth a lot, the coin toss is irrelevant, it’s the attitude and execution that wins.
But seriously, man up and stop the other team. We lost that Tennessee game by not stopping Tennessee at all during the entire game.
by Phantaskippy on Jun 29, 2009 6:20 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I knew the coin toss thing would stir things up...
And I intentionally hyperbolized the coin toss into losing the game, but what galls me, perhaps more so than it should, is that the rule is patently unfair and yet they allow it to continue. Letting a team win the toss, make a few first downs and kick a field goal, while the other team never gets the ball, especially in a playoff game, is not fair no matter how macho you want to make it: (Just stop ‘em!)…How simple would it be to say the first team to six points wins. At least you make the team get into the end zone, or kick twice, to win. I can’t see the drawback to that. Not only more fair, much more exciting. Also brings more strategy back in the game.
Thoughtful discussion with a sense of history
by maryrose on Jun 29, 2009 6:32 PM EDT reply actions 1 recs
agreed 100%
Freel free to email me anytime at behindthesteelcurtain@gmail.com with questions, suggestions, complaints, etc, or to just say what's up. -Michael Bean (Blitz)
by Blitzburgh on Jun 29, 2009 6:34 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
More controversy stirred perhaps.........
I’d be on board for a college like OT scenario, only starting the ball on the 40 instead of the 25. On the other hand, as much of an advantage the coin toss is in the NFL’s OT scenario, I’m a firm believer that if you are indeed a better squad, you have 60 minutes to prove it. If you can’t get it done in the first 60, I don’t feel sorry for the coin toss losing team in OT.
by jharmon64 on Jun 29, 2009 7:34 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'd just go like tennis
Or similar games, and make it so you can only win on an even number of possessions.
So if you score on your first possession, the other team gets one possession to catch up. If you don’t, and the opposing team scores, the game is over.
It still preserves the integrity of the football game in terms of including special teams, and it only extends the game by on average 1/2 of a possession compared to the existing system.
It’s probably not going to change any time soon, though, since the players are fine with things the way they are, apparently.
by yrro on Jun 29, 2009 9:05 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
The nightmares
I remember all of these games. Some more vividly than others.
I was overseas in Okinawa, Japan serving in the Air Force during the first of these disappointments. I vaguely recall Bubby Brister guaranteeing we would have a winning record that season, and the disastrous performances in weeks one and two. I also remember drinking all night and trying to stay awake for the start of the game vs. Houston in the wildcard round since it started in the middle of the night over there. I fell asleep but woke up just in time to watch the game winning kick advance us. I remember Bubby played exceptionally well in that Denver game and we had a legitimate shot at winning it. After the way the Steelers floundered in the mid 80’s that was a much better than expected season.
All I really remember about the KC game is giving up the 4th and goal TD and just knowing that Montana would find a way to get it done in the POs. One of the few playoff highlights for the floundering Chiefs organization.
The Titans game was awful. I remember several plays in that game. First being Larry Foote trying to sack McNair and just absolutely whiffing – I believe more than once. It took me several years to forgive Foote for those dismal plays and I can’t honestly say that I’m unhappy he is no longer with the team. The other is watching McNair in tears on the sideline after he had been knocked out of the game and our former QB O’ Donnell had to take over. I thought McNair was out and we would figure out a way to win. Alas, it wasn’t to be as we were victimized by one of the biggest flops in memory when Nedney took the dive. I really wasn’t looking forward to playing the Raiders again though had we won. Our D had no clue how to slow down Oakland’s offense.
Not surprisingly the most recent contest is running away with the poll in a landslide. Nice post. Look forward to the remainder of the countdown.
by King Coebra on Jun 29, 2009 8:04 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
You jogged my memory too
I was at an air force bar in Ramstien Germany during the Titans/Steelers game. I was serving with the Army in Kaiserslautern, but that bar always showed the Steelers games, and lets face it Air Force accomodations are always nicer than Army ones. 10 cent wings too!
"Damnit mom! You almost ran over Greg Lloyd!"
at an autograph signing back in 95. He walked out in front of our minivan, and my mom almost hit him. He apologized.
by PA ARMY OFFICER on Jun 30, 2009 10:09 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Don't Forget...
We also lost that game in Tennessee partially because of Plaxico “Don’t call me Rambo” Burress. Two minutes left to go, we’re tied and in Tennessee territory, and Tommy Maddox places a perfect throw right into Plax’s breadbasket, and he drops it. We end up having to punt, it goes into overtime, and the rest is history.
For a guy so valued on the market, Plax really did have a knack for dropping big passes in big games.
by Hines Ward on Jun 29, 2009 9:50 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
you forgot one thing about the titans game
nedney’s post game interview entailed him saying he was going to hollywood & retiring from football because of how his DIVE sold the penalty. and THAT’S when i started hating the titans. still get fired up thinking about it
by t1mmy10 on Jun 29, 2009 11:26 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
and my guess is the loss to SD in the AFC conference championship is going to be VERY high on the list…who decides to throw a pass with 4th and goal right infront of Seau when you have both Bam Morris and Foster in the backfield? retarded. i’m gonna love to hate your worst losses lol.
by t1mmy10 on Jun 30, 2009 12:02 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
#1
will have to be SB XXX. Also high on the list should be the 2004 AFCCG. Such high expectations and such a nasty beatdown.
But then I don’t remember much playoff football before the Cowher Era.
by JHolmes on Jun 30, 2009 8:06 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
ARGH. so many horrible memories
probably right with that being #1. 2001 afc championship lost to the pats will also be high. again high expectations & 14 of their freaking points came from special teams (they only won by 7). our defense really only let up 10 points. and we had 4 turnovers…although a lot were due to our team trying to score a lot of points to come back and our offense simply wasn’t built for that.
by t1mmy10 on Jun 30, 2009 1:34 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I voted for the 89 game against Denver, ...
although it’s not really a slam dunk in my mind.
- That 89 season was special in my mind because of what maryrose alluded to: the team started abysmally and improved as the year went on. Noll’s teams also had a tendency to raise their level of play in the playoffs, something Cowher’s teams rarely did. This was not really appreciated in the 70s because of all the talent on the roster at that time, but was apparent in the 80s (see 84 and 89 playoffs).
Hoge was a rb possessed in those 89 playoffs and Brister seemed like a leader. Maybe the Steelers would have been smoked by SF if they had made it to the Super Bowl, but who knows? Like I said, Noll’s teams had a pretty good track record in the playoffs and the his Steelers may have been able to match up with Montana (they were responsible for their only loss during the 84 season for example). And as maryrose said, that team had only gotten better as the season progressed.
- The 93 loss against KC was painful, but that loss was typical of that season. The 93 team was talented, more talented than the 92 team and as talented as the 94 team IMO. But yet they only finished 9-7 that year. Something was missing from that team that year. I heard gossip that their were some locker room issues that year. Who knows?
- The 02 loss was also typical. That team had no pass defense. It was exposed at the beginning of the season and was just as leaky in the playoffs. The team made Holcomb look like Dan Marino the previous week, although they came away with the win. I have no doubt that the Raiders would have carved up the Steelers the following week if the Steelers had beaten the Titans. You just can’t win in the playoffs with a porous defense. And that was probably the worst pass defense I’ve ever seen a playoff edition Steeler team have.
by steeler1275 on Jun 30, 2009 6:20 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I love the 02 team.
They beat the Brownies 3×. And I really liked Tommy Maddox before that JAX game.
by JHolmes on Jun 30, 2009 8:03 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I had a Chad Scott dart board
I hated our pass defense once we lost Woodson and Lake
"Damnit mom! You almost ran over Greg Lloyd!"
at an autograph signing back in 95. He walked out in front of our minivan, and my mom almost hit him. He apologized.
by PA ARMY OFFICER on Jun 30, 2009 11:04 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
89 is the game that always comes to my mind
Maybe because I was only 9 years old when this one happened, but I will never forget how hard I cried when this game was over. I can still remember viividly Merril Hoge sucking oxygen as he was playing the game of his life. This was one of the greatest coached teams I would say in Steelers and NFL history.
by TheCommish on Jun 30, 2009 11:35 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I wonder
If we’re going to see skewed results based on average blog reader age. I know the one I remember best (and worst) is the Tennessee game. There may be exceptions but I’d guess the recent ones will skew the results. But who says blog polls have to be fair?
by Chicago Steeler on Jun 30, 2009 9:28 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I opted not to vote.
Don't worry about the haters. Haters only hate.
by steelguy99 on Jun 30, 2009 11:22 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
me too
I'll drink your Milkshake, I'll drink it up!
by drinkyourmilkshake on Jun 30, 2009 11:36 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
1976-77
conference championship loss to the hated Raiders was my most disheartening playoff loss. We were the better team, but Franco and Rocky were both turf-toed in B’more the previous game. Terry couldn’t do it alone, and we got beat.
The Baltimore game (40-14 third-round KO) was interesting because after the game a small plane crashed into the bleachers at Memorial Stadium; no injuries. The pilot had apparently been imbibing.
My heros have always been Steelers...
by wozzle on Jun 30, 2009 11:11 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I really enjoy this topic structure
If I can make any suggestions, it would be to try and make sure that you incorporate years that each member here might remember. That is hard in a count down, but if that means adding a 4th instead of going by 3’s, so be it. I just think it would be more entertaining for everyone during the post.
That friggin Titans loss killed me. I forever hated the Titans and all Ref’s after that moment. Still, worst moment is yet to come, and I am sure we all have the same one, but damn, that was a heart breaker.
Great idea though!
by gimpsta7 on Jun 30, 2009 12:04 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
DeWayne Washington
one of my all time least favorite Steelers. He ran into (or didn’t) Nedney giving the Titans another FG shot. Never forgave him for that.
I go way back to 72 and think of the 3 losses posted the 02 game was the worst for me. The 89 team was playing above their heads to get there (92-10) and the 93 team had O’Dufus at QB (another on the least favorite list) thus Pittsburgh had no chance in that big game.
When You Run The Ball Good Things Happen
by 5020 on Jun 30, 2009 12:15 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
you should be more pissed at his slip allowing the titans to get into field goal range. it was a normal short pass that he was supposed to make the tackle & he slipped, letting a 5 yard play turn into a 20+ yards.
by t1mmy10 on Jun 30, 2009 1:38 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
2002 is winning? 1993 was way worse!
You people have short memories. In 2002, Tommy Maddox was our starting quarterback. Tommy Maddox! Realistically, who thought we could win the Super Bowl with Tommy Maddox? I still like the guy a lot, but going into the playoffs that year, I knew that we were a long shot with such a weak quarterback (yes, I know he was a first round pick, but so was Ryan Leaf).
In 1993, we had Neil O’Donnell and Barry Foster…. okay okay, they’re Steelers footnotes today, but at the time, they looked pretty capable. The pair definitely looked capable of winning the Super Bowl during that season.
Plus, in 1993 we had a F-ing terrific defense. One of my favorite. Kevin Greene, Greg Lloyd, Levon Kirkland, Chad Brown, Carnell Lake … and Hall of Famer Rod Woodson.
1993 was a great year for the Steelers, and it was easily the most heartbreaking loss (of these three). I still hold a small grudge against the Chiefs for that loss, despite their recent trend of failure.
by PaulMorel on Jun 30, 2009 1:57 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Can I change my vote?
Having given it some more thought to shake the cobwebs, you are probaly right. That was devastating.
As much as it brings back bad memories, I am so glad that the Nation can sit and talk about so many of them. We have just as many if not MORE great WINS. Just think how many teams don’t even have any APPEARANCES in the last 10 years (looking at you Dallas).
There is no spoon
by chewiesteeler on Jun 30, 2009 5:25 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
to be honest, i dont remember the 1993 game (i was 8 when it happened) and it sounds like a rough loss. but i dont agree with your take that the ‘93 the steelers had more going for them than in ’02…since you say thats your reason for thinking it’s a worse loss. i realize they made have had a ton of talent on their team in 93, but the core of players on that 02 team won a super bowl.
not to mention 2002: a # 3 seed for the playoffs. a division winner. 10-5-1. and in the divisional round.
93: a 6 seed. 9-7. and were only in the wildcard round.
the only thing the 93 had going for it was that they had a better defense than the 2002 team, but the 2002 team had a better offense than the 93 offense
by t1mmy10 on Jun 30, 2009 5:50 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Using that very argument
That ’93 team was largely the same team that went to the ’95 SB and nearly beat the Cowpokes (in one of their last playoff wins).
There is no spoon
by chewiesteeler on Jun 30, 2009 5:59 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
not to mention
that the ‘02 team didn’t have #7, who I would argue was the difference, rough game in XL or not….
by acrollet on Jun 30, 2009 9:51 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
the key word there is nearly
the ’93 had their differences from the ’95 team too. They basically had a completely different set of RBs and WRs than the 95 team. dwight stone & jeff graham were the #1 & 2 wrs. Ernie mills, yancey thigpen and andre hastings were 3, 4, and 6 respectively and only one managed more than 10 receptions for the year (mills had 29, but he didnt even have 400 yards)…and charles johnson wasn‘t on the team. Infact, eric green, our TE, led the team with receiving yards for the 93 season. And they didn’t have eric pigram or bam morris.
by t1mmy10 on Jul 1, 2009 12:54 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
they were a good team. i’m not trying to take anything away from them nor am i making predictions about what would happen. but i dont agree that a team that was 3-5 on the road (and the only .500 or better team they beat was by 1 point) had a better chance of winning the super bowl than the 2002 team, and thats the reason to make it a more heartbreaking loss than in 2002. especially since the 93 team would’ve had to go into buffalo (6-2 at home & our earlier win against them was in Pittsburgh) and then either houston (7-1 at home & where we got beat 23-3 earlier in the season) or raiders (5-3 at home).
i’m guessing there are plenty of heartbreaking plays from the ‘93 game that could give a person a reason to think it a worse loss than in ’02. but having the expectation of them going further than the ’02 isn’t one of them.
by t1mmy10 on Jul 1, 2009 1:08 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
You can't use statistics
That 93 team, especially while Foster was healthy, was certainly at least as good as the 02 team and with O’Donnell playing well and Hoge capably replacing Foster, had fewer weak areas than the 02 team. On defense, the secondary was MUCH better than the 02 team. The 93 special teams were better. On offense, the running backs and TE offset the relatively weak starting WRs, and Mills and Thigpen had both shown they could catch the ball. The 02 team was hit and miss with Maddox and a horrible secondary. The major pieces were there in 93 for a run to the Super Bowl and that group played well for a number of years in a row. The 00-03 group was more exciting on offense but the team had major flaws at QB and the secondary that killed them each year. The early 90s group played more consistently and could easily have gone to three Super Bowls in a row.
by steeler.lifer on Jul 1, 2009 3:34 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
it's not all about the skill set on a team, just look at the cowboys from last year
in ’02 the team was potentially a chincy/bull penalty call away from making it to the afc championship. agn it sounds like (cuz i was 8 during the ’93 playoff game) that there were A LOT of devastating plays during the game that kept them from winning, but they still had a big hill to climb before they ever got to the afc championship, let alone the super bowl.
the ‘02 team achieved more during the regular season than the ’93 team, even if they had less potential. and let’s not forget that in ‘02 the steelers went into week 17 with the possibility of having a bye in the playoffs. that’s a pretty good year in its own. the ’93 needed a dolphins loss (and maybe a jets too, i forget what the tiebreakers used to be before realignment) to just make the playoffs
by t1mmy10 on Jul 1, 2009 1:35 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
and those statistics make the point that in 93, the steelers had a lot of trouble in any game they had to travel far to the west. they were 0-4 when they had to cross the mississippi and every game they lost by 10 or more points. and if the steelers made it to the afc championship game they were going to have to travel to houston or LA.
by t1mmy10 on Jul 1, 2009 1:36 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
The kid movement
89’ still haunts me. I am right this is the Worley fumble right? We all know he would fumble. He always did.
by SteelBuckeye on Jun 30, 2009 7:44 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
The real culprit in the loss to Tennessee
Besides the fact that the defense allowed 34 points, burress dropped a sure 1st down pass late in the 4th quarter that would have but the Steelers in FG range
by Gwhiz on Jun 30, 2009 9:31 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Tenn game
was very, very painful! Having such momentum after a big Cleveland win set the stage for a great Titan game. Coming back the way we did v. Titan, having the game go into OT…I started to believe maybe this could be the year!!
Then to have Nedney miss!!!!!!!!!!!!!! OMG were gonna win this game….wait a minute…roughing the kicker????!!! What the……..!
Very, very painful!!!!
Infact, I might have to continue my shock therapy sessions to forget how painful that loss was…thanks alot MR :)
by SteelerMike on Jun 30, 2009 10:04 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Nedney made the first kick
Funny how no one seems to remember that Nedney actually made the first kick, but because Cowher called a last second timeout, so Nedney had to retake it.
Imagine if the Titans had missed because of a stupid last second timeout! I guess those last second timeouts are just part of the game, though. But embellishing a hit is not?
I was pretty sure Pittsburgh was going to lose when they couldn’t stop the Titans on any third down.
I was pretty young in 1993 and 1989, and would have to say that the San Diego loss was worse. I also thought the 2004 Patriots game was worse, because of our record, and the fact that we had beaten both the Patriots and the Eagles that year.
by paddym on Oct 24, 2009 10:58 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
93
89 was disappointing, but they had backed in and were playing over their heads. It would have been a tremendous upset against Elway, but alas he was Elway and came backm to win. The 2002 team was alot of fun. It was so great to have an NFL calliber qb who could anticipate a break and release the ball before the receiver was open. But the pass D was no good. They didnt stop McNair all day, maybe, maybe, they woulda won the next week?? The 93 team, however was a team that was clicking at the right time, after an up and down season, and injury problems. Barry Foster and Eric Green were both out. They had exposed the Bills in a Monday night beat down (still one of my favorite Steeler games). Cowhers Steelers arrived that night as a legit contender. The one play that sticks out to me was a dropped pass on 3rd and 5 by Dwight (hands of) Stone. Flat out drop. If he catches it , they run 3 more plays run out the clock. No punt, no punt block, no 4 shots at the end zone for Montana,(took all 4). The next week would have been a third date with a phenomenal Houston team. What sucks is that Montana somehow beat Buddy Ryans 46 defense, giving the Bills home field for the AFC title game where the Chiefs fizzled and the Bills went on to get dusted by the Cowboys. So part of my bizarre rationale is that, the 93 loss not only ended the Steelers season, but, was instrumental in a Cowboys superbowl win, since the Oilers were in my mind the toughest team in football that year, and would have hosted and beaten the Bills, and then the “Boys” for the first acf sb victory since 83.
by Micculus on Jul 1, 2009 6:06 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
1993
I remember when Joe Montana went to KC. There was some talk of bringing him here …home to finish his career as a Steeler. The same was said about Tony Dorsett. As a matter of fact Tony reportedly asked Noll along the sideline during a game…“Bring me home Chuck….Bring me home.” Noll smiled. Anyway, I knew we were in trouble when Montana had a little time to work with. We were! That Titans game is another bitter, painful memory because for me playing the Titans is like playing the Oilers. The Steelers of the ’70s won those.
by steelersrock08 on Jul 3, 2009 12:29 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Montana
I saw a montana interview where he said he wanted to come to Pittsburgh , after the Niners, but they weren’t interested. Imagine the 93-96 Steelers with Joe Montana rather than O’Donnell. Almost as bad as thinking about the 84- ???? Steelers with Marino instead of Gabe Rivera.
by Micculus on Jul 3, 2009 2:52 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs

by 



















