Behind the Steel Curtain: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
New Blog: Voodoo Five for South Florida Bulls Fans!

The 12 Most Heartbreaking Playoff Losses In Pittsburgh Steelers History: #4


We're now down to the Final Four of heartbreakers in Pittsburgh Steelers' playoff history.  Again, ranking these games is like ranking ice cream.  There are no right and wrong opinions.  At the end, our tournament will determine how BTSC Steeler Nation feels as a whole.

#4 - 1976 Season:  Raiders 24 Steelers 7

While the game itself was a total flop, the situation surrounding this game was excruciating.  When asked which Steelers' team was the greatest of all time, both Art Rooney and Dan Rooney proclaimed that the 1976 team was their top choice.  That alone is enough testimony to put this loss among the top four playoff losses of all-time.  Simply put, the 1976 Steelers' defense was the finest that I and many others have ever seen, and by far.  People who never saw that team might compare total defensive numbers with other great NFL teams, but comparisons do not tell the story.  The first third of the season was awful.  After five games the Steelers, Super Bowl Champions mind you, looked in the mirror at a hideous 1-4 record.  They had scored 108 points themselves and had given up two more than that, 110, for an average of 22 points surrendered per game. 
 

Star-divide

Little did anyone know at that point that the last two thirds of the season were going to be a defensive majesty.  In the middle five games, the Steelers gave up three field goals. Period.  In that "middle season" the Steelers went 15 straight quarters without surrendering a single point and 21 straight quarters without giving up a touchdown. Close your eyes and imagine that today.

Steel_curtain_medium

The final third of the season was almost as good as the middle third, if such can be fathomed. The final trimester featured another 11 consecutive quarters without giving up a single point and 12 straight stanzas without allowing a touchdown.  A total of 28 points were scored against Pittsburgh over the last nine games.  If you’re scoring at home, that is a meager three-point average for the final two-thirds of the season.  Heading into the playoffs, that ugly first third of the season was a distant memory, replaced by recent visions of defensive lockdown not seen before in the modern NFL.

Steel_curtain_blocking_field_goal_medium

 Against Baltimore in the first round of the playoffs, the final score did not dampen the spirits of Steelers’ fans. Because of those first five games, Pittsburgh had to travel in the playoffs, but it didn’t matter if it played the Colts in Baltimore, Pittsburgh or Venus.  The Steelers annihilated the Colts, 40-14, in a game that wasn’t that close. Baltimore had the best offense in the league in 1976, the only team to cross the 400-point milestone (417), and it was manhandled in its own yard.

 Unfortunately for Steelers, that game would signal the end of what could have been a glorious season for Pittsburgh, vying to become the first NFL team to win three consecutive Super Bowls. Both Franco Harris and Rocky Bleier were injured in that game and neither would play the next weekend in Oakland.  1976 was the year that Harris and Bleier both ran for 1,000-yard seasons, an historical gem in the NFL annals.  The defense fought gallantly, but a blocked punt gave Oakland its first three points and a deflected interception of Terry Bradshaw was returned to the Steelers' one-yard line, setting up a 10-0 Oakland lead.  Pittsburgh cut the lead to 10-7 after a 75-yard drive, but without Franco and Rocky controlling the clock, the Steelers’ offense could not match up against a powerful Oakland club.

Franco_harris_medium  Rocky_bleier_medium

When healthy these two men, both 1,000-yard rushers, led the Steelers to Super Bowl Titles

Oakland finally put together an offensive drive near the end of the first half and punched it in for a 17-7 midway advantage.  An identical drive in the third quarter made the score 24-7, which is where it ended.  Reggie Harrison, who scored the Steelers' lone touchdown, rushed for a paltry 44 yards to lead Pittsburgh.  Harrison could not replace Harris and Bleier, and in fairness to him, that is exactly what he was asked to do.  NFL teams all used two running backs in their offensive set in those days.  The aging Frenchy Fuqua just didn't have it anymore, so Chuck Noll and staff spent all week in practice creating a new offense featuring a single running back, that being an inexperienced Reggie Harrison.  It was an insurmountable challenge, especially against a team like the Oakland Raiders.  Oakland went on to trounce the Minnesota Vikings in the Super Bowl, 32-14, something the Steelers might well have done also.  Prior to learning that both Franco and Rocky would not play in that AFC Championship Game, I was never more confident, and still have not been to this day, that the Pittsburgh Steelers were destined to win an NFL title.

0 recs  |  Comment 35 comments  |  Add comment |

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

That was a team of destiny.

Maybe the best to ever play, when they were all healthy.

by Phantaskippy on Jul 7, 2009 12:01 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

To me this is number one

We had the chance to become the first NFL team to win three consecutive Super Bowls, that’s something that I don’t think I will see in my life time. Think about it. That will have been the hardest record ever to break in the NFL, and the PS were, in my mind, two injuries away from doing it. Two injuries away to be forever consider the best team ever to play.

But it wasn’t just winning, is how dominant we were. Yes the 1976 Steelers’ defense was the finest that ever play this game.
 
But our offense was great, the running attack was one of the best in history, and Bradshaw and company where killing teams with play action.

The stats will never show this because the Steelers had annihilated every team by the end of the first half, so they just shut down the passing attack. There where some games that they will not attempted a single pass during the second half.

This is the year I became a Steelers fan, and I believe the 78 Steelers nor any other Steelers team were as dominant as this team was.

In fact nor the 07 Patriots, 85 Bears or 72 Dolphins where near as dominant as this team was.

Problem was the 76 Raiders were a very very good team, one of the best in history, so we needed to be healthy.

I don’t know it just broke my young heart, I knew that with out the SB this team will be forgotten and will never be acknowledge for what it was, the best ever.

I don’t think that in any of the other heartbreaking losses the Steelers lost a bigger chance for immortality as we did with this one.

by mikemex on Jul 7, 2009 1:13 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Another theory

The defense was great that season.

But I wanted to mention something most Steeler fans never talk about.

The Steelers of the 70s were great because even though they laid an egg from time to time there was this belief that they could always beat the other best teams in the NFL consistetnly. This would include the Cowboys, the Raiders, the Oilers (later in the decade) etc.

But in 1976, the Steelers lost almost every time they faced a really good team. When they started the season 1-4, 3 of those losses were to Oakland, Minnesota and New England. Those 3 teams went on to finish 13-1, 11-2-1, and 11-3.

Then when they went on their 9 game winning streak to end the season, they beat a bunch of mediocre teams. The only very good team they faced was Cincinnati.

So I’m not so sure if the Steelers would have beaten the Raiders that year if Franco was healthy. They lost to the Raiders earlier in the year with Franco and Rocky.

Also, go back to their other Super Bowls in the 70s. They often had a star player or two injured, yet they always won. Not in 1976 though.

by steeler1275 on Jul 7, 2009 1:17 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Good point

Cincinnati was a good team and the Colts were a very good team, best offensive team of the year.

I remember I was surprise to know that coming into de AFCCG the Steelers were favored to beat the 13-1 Raiders at home.

I am not sure if the Steelers would have beaten the Raiders with Franco and Rocky healthy, but I liked our chances, but I knew we had cero chance with out them. The Raiders had an incredible OL and with out the Steelers been able to control the ball our defense wasn’t going to hold the Raiders the entire game. It is amazing they only gave two scoring drives and the first one near the end of the first half.

by mikemex on Jul 7, 2009 12:30 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

i'm not sure i agree with your theory

let me qualify what i’m about to say is that it was almost another 20 years before i would be born & have never seen seen a game from that year so i’m going completely by stats.

But the steelers did beat good teams, some by big scores: 10-4, 9-5, 10-4, 11-3
and the steelers only lost to good/great teams. we lost to 9-5, 13-1, 11-3, 11-2-1…with the 9-5 being on the road to the division rivals browns. and in 3 of the 4 losses the steelers hung in with the teams & probably had chances to beat them since they only lost by 3 points or less.

by t1mmy10 on Jul 8, 2009 10:52 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

ill just say that

there is a chapter in the book about the 76 defense. Details coming very soon about it, as it’s now available for purchase.

good stuff rose.

wish i had been alive to see this team.

Freel free to email me anytime at behindthesteelcurtain@gmail.com with questions, suggestions, complaints, etc, or to just say what's up. -Michael Bean (Blitz)

by Michael Bean (Blitz) on Jul 7, 2009 1:23 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Same with me

…and that I was born in America….i love my rugby sure, but think I wouldve been really good at Football

Bleeding Black and Gold.....forever

by Steeler_ on Jul 7, 2009 1:31 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

What's the name of the book

and where is it available for purchase? (Autographed copies at Latrobe next month?)

by Alba on Jul 7, 2009 6:56 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Noll said the decision to install the one-back offense was his biggest coaching mistake ever. Was ever this game that Lambert said, he’d like to “drink a 6-pack and play it again.”

In an oddity, Gerela was injured, and Ray Mansfield kicked the extra point.

Good work, MaryRose. I very much look forward to these pieces.

by swissvale72 on Jul 7, 2009 6:33 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

I can't believe I left out the Mansfield part

It was actually a prominent note in my draft (though not sure how much impact on the game itself). When was the last time a center kicked an extra point in the NFL?

Thoughtful discussion with a sense of history

by maryrose on Jul 7, 2009 8:45 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I think it had zero impact, maryrose. I had forgotten about it, and in fact when I read somewhere during the last couple of years that Mansfield had once kicked an extra point in an AFCCG, my initial response was, “No, he didn’t,” but checked the boxscore, and sure enough.

I have no memory of that though, and I don’t at all remember the Steelers being in postion for a FG that game and not being able to kick. I do remember their O doing very, very little.

by swissvale72 on Jul 7, 2009 9:54 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Other thing we forget going through ‘76 was that it sure looked as though Steelers would win 9 in a row, surrender only 28 points while doing so and still not make the playoffs. Bengals weren’t losing either, except to us!!

Came down to season’s next to last week, and we needed Oakland to beat Cinci in a Monday nighter on the west coast. Given the Raiders-Steelers animosity, and the fact that Oakland had already clinched homefield, many expected the Raiders to tank this game. When Cinci took an early 6-0 lead, our hearts sank, as our lone remaining hope for the playoffs would have been for the lowly, 3-11 Jets, to beat the Bengals the following week. Raidas came through for us though…..making the AFCCG rematch possible.

In a sidenote, this was the first of 3 occasions (others being the following year, ‘77, and then once more in ’89) where the Bengals lost late, opening up a playoff slot for the Steelers while their sorry asses stayed home. Oh….throw in ’06 as another year in which Steelers didn’t make the playoffs but kept the Bengals out with a win at Paul Brown in the finale.

by swissvale72 on Jul 7, 2009 7:03 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Thanks Swissvale72, ive been impressed with your knowledge of the history of the steelers its a nice compliment to maryrose and some of the others who were around to experience those amazing years. (and some of the piss poor ones leading up to it).

Also on an Unrelated note, mobile commenting is now working. This is my first shot at it. So all you crackberry addicts have another way to keep in touch with BTSC!

I'll drink your Milkshake, I'll drink it up!

by drinkyourmilkshake on Jul 7, 2009 7:29 AM EDT via mobile up reply actions   0 recs

Thanks, Shake…..

I’ve got two passions:
a. Pittsburgh Steelers football
b. Writing about Pittsburgh Steelers football

I also have a memory that has no filter for Pittsburgh Steelers football, having catalogued my life by the ups & downs of the black & gold. I’ll be glad to share where I can.

Nice site yinz run…I was turned on to it by Maryrose’s “Most Heartbreaking” series.

by swissvale72 on Jul 7, 2009 8:06 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Hey Swissvale72,

Not that it’s a huge deal, but it does make it a bit easier to follow the thread if you use the reply button that is shown in each individuals comment if you are replying directly to a comment. It helps everyone know who you’re statements are directed at. No big deal, but just wanted to throw it out there in case you hadn’t noticed that tool.

I'll drink your Milkshake, I'll drink it up!

by drinkyourmilkshake on Jul 7, 2009 8:55 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Thanks Drink, I’m an unabashed and pervasive techno-dummy. I’ve hit reply just now, so let’s see if i’ve done it right.

by swissvale72 on Jul 7, 2009 9:52 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

No prob…Looks like you did it right with your response to Mary Rose up top…

You’ll get the tricks

I'll drink your Milkshake, I'll drink it up!

by drinkyourmilkshake on Jul 7, 2009 10:19 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

76

Perhaps my favorite Steelers team of all time and in my opinion the greatest defense to ever play the game. “Before you win a game you have to not lose it” Chas “The Emperor” Noll was fond of saying. After the 1-4 start this defense would not allow the team to lose 1 more game until Oakland.

The only TDs the Steelers gave up during the late season scoreless run were to Houston after building a huge lead. Ken Burroughs caught a long TD pass then Houston scored another meaningless TD in the 4th quarter of a 21 point Oiler loss.

Traveling to Oakland the Steelers were not only without Harris and Bleier but also young phenom Jack “The Hydroplane” Deloplaine who hurt his groin a couple weeks before. Deloplaine had a huge game in the rain during the season earning his nickname. He had yound legs, was hungry and would have made a difference. Once in Oakland, Fuqua was on his last legs and was less than immaculate and Harrison was over matched. The one back system was stoned cold by the Raiders defense. It was not surprising that this group of true champions were still within 10-7 late in the 2nd quarter before the wheels fell off. I’m sure Oakland was nervous.

This 76 Raiders team was perhaps their best assembly of talent throughout the 70s. It was disappointing that the Steelers lost their shot at a three peat but many didn’t truly feel they had a chance without their vaunted running game. The losses in 94 and XXX hurt worse. I must add that the article on the 76 defense coming out in Maple Street Press Steelers Annual is one of the best written pieces I have ever read.

When You Run The Ball Good Things Happen

by 5020 on Jul 7, 2009 10:03 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

So If the Steelers Had Beaten Oakland in this Game...

…would Harris and/or Bleier been available to play in the Super Bowl? Does anyone know or remember the severity of the injuries? It’s a bit of a moot point, but IMO factors into deciding how disappointing this loss was.

by Weegie on Jul 7, 2009 11:30 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Maybe 32 Not 20

Franco had bruised (possibly broken ribs) and may have been able to play in XI. Bleier had a broken toe and probably could not have played. Another back, Deloplaine had injured his groin and was out indefinitely including several weeks before Oakland.

When You Run The Ball Good Things Happen

by 5020 on Jul 7, 2009 12:23 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

You have to give the Raiders more credit

This game was incredibly frustrating but the biggest source of frustration was not the absence of Bleier and Harris, but because on the field the Raiders played a better brand of Steeler football than the Steelers did. They won the the battle in the trenches on both sides of the ball. It might have been a bad decision to go with a single-back offense but Madden had a surprise of his own by pounding the ball straight at the Steelers and having success. His team got the lead and he made the right decision to play ball control and field position. Stabler hardly threw the ball but they kept a couple of crucial drives going behind vanEeghen, Banaszak and Davis. That’s what was really frustrating to me, seeing the defense give up those two TD drives. Grudgingly, but that was the difference in the game. It wasn’t a bad bounce or a big play or stupid mistake that beat us, it was a better team on the day.

by steeler.lifer on Jul 7, 2009 11:39 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Agree

as I stated above, this was perhaps the best Raider team that they fielded throughout the 70s. Their 3 headed RB tandem bludgeoned the Steelers all day long.

When You Run The Ball Good Things Happen

by 5020 on Jul 7, 2009 12:25 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Is my memory correct? In the AFC Championship game, Oakland benefitted from a questionable pass interference penalty that cost New England the game? I know New England was their only loss that year during the regular season.

by grapes on Jul 7, 2009 11:48 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Oakland benefitted from a bogus Roughing the Passer call on Sugar Bear Hamilton. Say “Ben Dreith” among Patriots faithful (all two dozen of them) and they still go into convulsions. It gave Oakland a first down on their winning drive, whereas they were staring at about 4th & 10.

I remember getting up the morning of the AFCCG, working at Pressley Ridge School, on Marshall Avenue on the North Side, driving past Three Rivers, and lamenting, pre-game, that had New England not been screwed over, the game that day would be in Pittsburgh.

You’re right about Oakland dominance of the Steeler lines. As far as Franco & Rocky and their readiness for the SB, Franco had a rib injury, and I think Rocky’s was upper body as well. I think there was 2 weeks to SB, so they might’ve been in there.

by swissvale72 on Jul 7, 2009 11:54 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Both would have been ready in the Super Bowl

Franco bruised his ribs, which is painful, but not season-ending by any means. Rocky sprained a toe, also not season-ending. They had two weeks before the Super Bowl, so they in all likelihood would have been ready. Even Frenchy Fuqua had a bruised calf, necessitating the makeshift one-back three tight end concoction that Noll and company whipped up.

Thoughtful discussion with a sense of history

by maryrose on Jul 7, 2009 12:09 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Interesting how

years later a bogus call would give New England a game over the Raiders and a matchup with the Steelers in an AFCCG.

"The team that scores the most points wins."
John Madden
(Master of the obvious)

by PixburghArn on Jul 7, 2009 12:47 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Curious

Thanks to all the fans who have clear recollections of this game. I love these old school posts. I really enjoy learning the Steelers history I was unaware of.

My question is a little answered above, but I’m curious how this greatest defense of all time allowed 21 points. Was it simply that the time of possession was so skewed because the Steelers offense was inexistent? Was it a field position problem?

by Chicago Steeler on Jul 7, 2009 12:57 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

IMO

The Steelers D was exhausted. The game was a tight 10-7 affair when the Raiders drove to a time consuming TD late in the 2nd quarter to forge a 10 point lead at the half. A similar 3rd quarter drive drained the Steelers of their energy.

The Steelers mustered very little offense in the first half and none in the second. They were eventually worn down by the Raiders running game and succumbed 24-7. This Steelers D was the greatest defense of all time. But Chi Steeler, on any given Sunday one team wins and one team loses. On this Sunday the Raiders were the better (and healthier) team and the Steelers with their injured running game and a passing game that had yet to evolve went down to defeat.

When You Run The Ball Good Things Happen

by 5020 on Jul 7, 2009 1:26 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

…and Loren Toews was hit by an ice cream cone (think it was chocolate) thrown from the stands, as he exited the field to the sideline.

by swissvale72 on Jul 7, 2009 1:45 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Hey...

Didn’t she play “Julie, your Cruise Director” on the “Love Boat” ?

Crush and Kill!

by jacksteel on Jul 7, 2009 3:10 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

This is probably number 1 for me.......

Possibly the loss to the undefeated ’72 Dolphins was worse, as time has passed it really has been annoying to know those guys are popping champagne……

1976 was a great year though, all around. Bicentennial, some great movies, and great football. Was looking forward to another Super Bowl and I felt horrid watching the Raiders bomb the Vikes. However, those Raiders-Steelers games were always rough, and lets not forget the Raiders were 13-1 that year.

Still though, with a healthy Franco and our Rocky, I liked our chances too.

by imike29 on Jul 7, 2009 4:23 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

What are your feelings about the #4 rankings? Should it be higher or lower? Not what happened in '76...

I thought this thread was supposed to be about the rankings of heartbroken games in steelers history? Not one person posted that they either agree with the ranking or disagreed with it. I know it sounds like I’m being picky here but I know all about 1976 and what occurred and everyone on here is just simply rehashing the past. It’s fun to read one, two, and three posts about 1976 but not 30 of them. Let’s stick with the original point of the thread. I personally think the ‘94 lost and the ’01 lost was more heartbreaking than ’76. The ’76 lost was more significant for history purposes but it pales with the heartache of 94 and 01 (plus we were home too) since we hadn’t won a super bowl since the 70’s and we fans had been waiting for a long time. It is sad that the ‘76 team didn’t win since everyone considers that team to be the best of the Super 70’s Steelers and I agree.

by vegasrugger on Jul 7, 2009 4:40 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

re: What are your feelings about the #4 rankings? Should it be higher or lower? Not what happened in '76..

QUOTE: “I thought this thread was supposed to be about the rankings of heartbroken games in steelers history? Not one person posted that they either agree with the ranking or disagreed with it.”

Okay, so you are saying that I should not post my opinions of which games I found to be the most heartbreaking to me? Well, I find that to be hypocritical of you!

Your response to most heartbreaking loss number 9-7:

“I agree. 1994 should easily be top 5! I realize that this is one poster’s opinion but #7? No way! In fact this lost is considered one of the top losses in Pittsburgh sports history, along with francisco cabrera, game 7 islanders lost, and…stillers 1994 lost to SD (remember this also set off the home AFC championship losses as well). These are generally regarded as the most heartbreaking losses…

by vegasrugger on Jul 1, 2009 6:14 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs"

Seems to me you did exactly what you are criticizing others for.

Finally, at the bottom of the original post to this countdown, maryrose wrote the following:

“Surely some will remember other games that they would replace on the list and for that matter, I am sure we would all have the list in different orders. That’s great; that’s what we’re here to talk about.”

This is a blog, and we are all here to talk about our favorite team, games, players or memories. Just as you did not agree about the positioning of the number #7 game, I did not particularly agree with the placement of this game.

by imike29 on Jul 8, 2009 2:15 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

time stand still

This is by far and away the worst!! I can remeber everything like it was yesterday. While I will grudgingly give the raiders the credit they deserve; it was a great team, one of the best that was ever fielded, but as a10 year old it was impossible to see that.And as an adult and a football coach it is so clear how different football was back then; so much was predicated on the running game and controlling the clock.Even teams that were considered good at throwing the ball; Steelers,raiders,colts,cowboys,vikings,were still very dependant upon being able to keep a defense honest by running the ball with some consistency.The only real wide open zone scheme that threw the ball like teams today was seen 2 years later in San diego with Don Coryell and his crew. As a kid this was the most traumatic thing that happened to me before I lost my Grandma. But I must say that it also taught me to savor the victories when they came. As a steelers fan I remember these teams with a certain fondness and a sense of longing for the past.It also makes me aware that I am actually getting old!! Oh yea, it also keeps my hatred for the raiders as hot as some of these youngsters hate the ravens and traitriots!!

by wmd3 on Jul 7, 2009 7:15 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

I was at the Baltimore playoff game that year

My brother’s in-laws lived within walking distance of the old Memorial Stadium so we stolled to and from the game.

We had seats right behind the Colts bench. They injured Rocky on the opening kickoff and were taunting him and the Steelers as they were helping him off the field. The offensive line came onto the field glaring daggers at the Colts bench and then promptly drove down the field for a TD. The Steelers spent the rest of the afternoon beating the Colts like they stole something. The defensive line looked like they were not content with just sacking QB Bert Jones, they wanted to knock him out of the game. Dwight White, in particular seemed crazed. Franco had a 150 yards rushing in the first half. I don’t think anyone could have beaten that Steeler team that day. If anything the 40-14 score didn’t reflect how thorough a beating they administered particularly in light of the fact that it was a playoff game. And, oh yeah, a plane crashed into the upper deck of the stadium after the game ended (no one was injured).

With that as prologue, the Oakland game was kinda hard to take. I will acknowledge that the Raiders were one frustrated franchise. It had been eight years since they had last been to the Super Bowl (a loss). The Steelers in many respects reflected what they aspired to but had not achieved, both on the field and in the public mind. Plus the Steelers had ended their season three of the previous four years. Just think about how Steeler Nation was feeling about the Patriots thru the first half of this decade. That would have been a hard game to win with Franco and Rocky.

by RickVa on Jul 8, 2009 5:03 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs


User Tools

Welcome to BTSC, a blog dedicated to the SIX-time world champion Steelers.

"Thoughtful discussion with a sense of history."

Art Rooney Jr.

"Level-headed thinking." Pittsburgh Post-Gazette

Start posting about the Steelers »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

Connect_with_facebook

Comcast NFL RedZone Moments from SB Nation

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
BTSC 2010 NFL Mock Drafts : Updated 03/16 (4 round edition)
Fear_the_turtle_small
2009 Offensive Third Down Efficiency
09_mc501_hemlet_105270_small
A Look Ahead at the Offseason and Five Four-Round Mock Drafts
Small
BTSC Predict the Pick
Franco72_small
Ben's Version

Recent FanPosts

Tomlin_small
Has Steigerwald Gone Mad?
Small
We need to draft Tebow!!
Me_as_a_simpson_small
Represent Your Team in MHR's Live Mock!
Btsc_pic_small
My final mock draft (I promise)
92_avatar_small
South Park and #7
Ronniebrownjuke_small
Franchise Players
Small
Tomlin in FL looking at Tebow...
Steelersmascot_1_front_75933_small
Does Steeler Nation want Ben as our QB???
Ward_sketch_small
Christmas is over.
932050048_l_small
Maika Polamalu

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Latest NFL Headlines from SB Nation

Stampede Blue
March Madness 3/19 Recap and late night Open Thread
Stampede Blue
March Madness 3/19 Open Thread #5
Stampede Blue
March Madness 3/19 Open Thread #4

SPONSORS

SBNation.com Recent Stories

Photo

Redskins Hosting Private Workout For Oklahoma QB Sam Bradford

Photo

Conflicting Reports On The Future Of 49ers GM Scot McCloughan

Photo link

Dez Bryant To Work Out For The Cowboys

More from SBNation.com >


Site Founder & Editor

Me2_small Michael Bean (Blitz)

Steelers Historian

Steeler_small maryrose

Bringing You Your Daily Six Pack

Plainview_small drinkyourmilkshake