Behind the Steel Curtain: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Around SBN: Interview With UMD Athletic Director, Dr. Debbie Yow

Sunday afternoon Practice observations

Went up to Latrobe for practice this afternoon, here are a few things I saw.

Recievers: I think this is going to be less of a competition than we thought before camp started. Sweed looked fine, Wallace was getting open alot but also seemed to run the wrong route on at least one play causing Ben to throw to an empty spot. Ben wasn't too happy about that one. McDonald made a fantastic TD grab when Dennis Dixon was running the two minute drill but he had another couple passes that he seemed to bobble before he gained control. One guy to watch out for is Martin Nance who is finally healthy and practicing. All three QBs seemed to find him frequently on Sunday. He runs solid routes and has the height to go up and make plays that no other recievers except Sweed can make. He seemed to be getting open alot today although he did have some issues catching balls in traffic. The other nice thing about Nance is he can play any of the WR spots.

 

Issac Redman : They ran I believe 7 snaps in the goal line drill, all with Redman at tailback. He looked really good at picking the right hole and getting through it. He also bounced a couple outside and went in untouched. I'm not really sure what the significance of him getting all the carries is but I was suprised no one else even got a touch. Maybe we aren't going to see Frank the Tank on the goal line after all. Although he was lead blocking on some of those TD runs by Redman.

 

Dennis Dixon : The guy just throws darts. Sure he needs some work and polish to become an NFL pocket passer, but he's going to be a solid player in a year or two.  I really like what he brings to the table, maybe in a few years we can trade him for some picks a la Matt Schaub.  He has too much talent to be a career backup.

 

A few other things I noticed were  Jason Cappizi destroyed Kirschke (i think) in one on one drills. Just flat out knocked him down with one shot.  Also as far as punt returners go, Mike Wallace took a few and looked pretty good doing it. Stefan Logan muffed one, I don't think that experiment is going to pan out.

 

St. Vincent is a great place to go watch a practice, I'd highly recommend going down there if you get the chance.

2 recs  |  Comment 44 comments  |  Add comment

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

Great write up

Thanks for sharing your notes on practice.

I think at this point Redman pretty much has a spot on the team locked. Jim Wexell said out of 7 GL attempts he punched in 5. He also said 3 of the scores were against the first team defense.

by Johnny_S on Aug 16, 2009 8:44 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

yep

and one of the two where he didn’t get in, was awfully close to being a touchdown. I think it probably would’ve been challenged in a real game.

by schnifin on Aug 16, 2009 8:49 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

OMG

Way to go Tomlin. Put the kid out there and let him fight. If he can score on our first team defense with this line he deserves the spot.

I’m officially taking back all of my we won’t keep 3 runners argument for him being left off the roster and am joining the Redman fan club..

by Phantaskippy on Aug 16, 2009 9:29 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Redman would make 4 running backs

If Redman is the new short-yardage back, that would give us four pure RBs on game days, joining FWP, Mendenhall and Moore. The real issue is do we keep a pure FB (Davis or Summers) as well as three TEs, or use either McHugh or Johnson as the FB. If we go 4 RB, 1 FB and 3 TE it probably means one less linebacker or DB on game days. It’s a big question for Tomlin. How important is it to fix the running game if it means one less defensive backup?

by steeler.lifer on Aug 17, 2009 12:11 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I think

They will not get rid of both Davis and Summers. From what I hear though, Davis is better rounded (positional flexibility) and does better on special teams stuff. Unfortunately, it is going to be Davis and either Redman or Summers.

by Johnny_S on Aug 17, 2009 8:43 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I hope summers can win that spot from Davis

But he’s a rookie and blitz reading isn’t the easiest thing.

Moore is our third down back, and a pass catcher, unless they plan on Mendenhall taking his spot. I don’t see more than a 1st and 2nd string 2 down back. That’s what I meant by runner. Redman would give us Parker Mendy and Redman as 2 down backs. Now if Mendenhall can fit the third down back role Redman would be up against Moore to make the team, and he could oust Moore with short yardage excellence.

I am trying to see the different combinations that would lead to these guys being able to make the team, and it seems to my thinking Frank has to beat out Davis or McHugh and a non-st player needs to lose to a new guy who does both. Either that or Redman needs to look good in ST play.

Either way the running back duties needed appear to be:

Starting Runner – FWP

Back up runner – Mendenhall (Moore or Redman if things go weird or just right for them)

Third down back – Moore or Mendenhall if he can win it, I think it is Moore, he’s freaking good.

Side Car (blocker/runner/reciever from shotgun) Davis, Mendenhall, Moore. Hopefully not Davis.

Short Yardage back – Redman if the cards go right, Mendenhall if they don’t.

Lead Blocker – Tank (please!) Davis, Redman, McHugh, Johnson. I like Johnson but I doubt he gets it, Tank looks good, Davis stinks but he stinks at a lot of things (versatility is the word) McHugh does both this and third TE so he frees up a roster spot, which is a bonus Tomlin likes.

Special Teams – the more we take the more need to be really good at ST. But we still need a couple to play good in ST. Davis, Tank appear to be good, others don’t do it or don’t look good.

FWP and Mendenhall make the team unless injury or massive suckage for Mendy knock them off.

If Mendenhall can win the third down back spot Moore becomes expendable (his return duties would be covered in this scenario making him expendable). Only proposing this because they are rolling Mendy out to receiver, which is a third down back role. We’ll see, but this loss of a great versatile player that I would hate to see go would be the best scenario for Tank and Red making the team.

Otherwise we need to shave spots like Davis (Tank can pull this off, esp. if Moore stays and Mendenhall can catch and block too) by beating them out of their job with multiple people taking over the roles they fill. (IE Tank blocks and does ST while Mendy catches passes and side cars w/ Moore)

Redman won’t beat out Davis IMO, that battle is with the Tank, and I am leaning toward the Tank.

For Redman to make it, he needs to win the second string runner job, develop a real solid bit of versatility, or have all the cards in the universe fall perfectly into place.

This assumes that he continues to dominate the short yardage leading to Tomlin wanting him on the team really bad.

If Tank beats Davis and Mendenhall works as a third down back and either Redman or Tank show hands, Redman might take Moore’s spot, as Mendy would fill a third down/second runner/sidecar spot and Redman would be a second runner/short yardage/sidecar. The overlap would allow it to work, because if one went down the Steelers would be covered at all roles.

That to me is the most likely scenario. I don’t see Redman making the team and Tank not. It could happen, I just don’t see it (unless Redman can block and run at the same time) You don’t have your short yardage back also lead blocking. If Davis and McHugh fill the roles I guess I could see Tank off the roster, but at that point I would expect Redman to be off the roster too. No RB is taking McHugh off the roster, that would be Johnson if it happens.

by Phantaskippy on Aug 17, 2009 11:11 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Oh crap

didn’t realize I went on that long, sorry for that.

by Phantaskippy on Aug 17, 2009 11:12 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Good thoughts

You didn’t go on too long so no need to apologize. However another couple of weeks will answer all your questions. Moore is certainly more than just a third-down back as he proved last year but that’s his role. Mendenhall can catch but he’s a long way from reading blitzes and picking up blocks which the third-down back has to do. Johnson and McHugh being able to play HB, blocking effectively whether on the line or out of the backfield, will be the major issues for keeping a true FB and how many of them are on the 53-man. I think there’s a good chance all of the following will be on the 53-man: FWP, Mendy, Moore, Redman, Summers, Davis, Johnson and McHugh. Game day decisions will be difficult.

by steeler.lifer on Aug 17, 2009 1:24 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I think you're thinking about this a little too hard

It’s pretty obvious that Parker, Mendy, and Moore have NFL talent and that Davis is Bruce Arians’ BDSM partner. None of those guys have looked great plunging in from the one, and we had an almost identical role last year for Gary Russell, so it makes sense to find the guy who can do that as long as you’re not picking him over a considerably better overall talent.

From what I’ve seen and heard, Summers isn’t a special talent, and his only advantage over Redman might be his hands in the passing game. You’d think Summers would be the better short yardage guy, but it’s looking more and more like Redman is. Consdering that we already have two guys that are assets in the passing game and no one that can pick up a yard when we need it, the obvious answer is to find the guy who can fill that role the best which certainly appears to be Redman.

Summers could still win the FB position, but he’d have to kill off Zed first.

charity standing orders

by BadMaafala on Aug 17, 2009 3:47 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

“Zed is dead baby”

by Johnny_S on Aug 17, 2009 4:09 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Different between Redman and Russell...

…was I think Russell “contributed” on STs as a returner, though not a very good one. But that’s what allowed him to dress for all those games. Redman needs to show something on special teams IMO to make the roster. I hope he can because I do like his running style, the way those legs keep on churning into, and through contact, is great to see.

by KiwiSteelerFan on Aug 17, 2009 10:03 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

nice to see him using the kid but...

…if he wants to make the roster the likelihood is he has to flash something for special teams as well. It’s tough to see us dressing 5 RBs on game days. Be interested to see what Mendenhall can do on the goal line running behind Frank Summers too. Sounds like he’s quite the lead blocker.

Here’s hoping Redman can show some versatility though and push Carey Davis off the roster.

by KiwiSteelerFan on Aug 17, 2009 12:55 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I really like him

Hes earning his due, and deserves to be the Gary Russell of last season…except i think hell be better

Bleeding Black and Gold.....forever

by Steeler_ on Aug 17, 2009 12:01 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Great write up, I was wondering what would change after game 1.

Did any of the backup lineman get time on the first line, or did they keep the lines intact?

by Phantaskippy on Aug 16, 2009 9:34 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

I think we are all excited about Redman

and this is like a present.

Good write up.

by shleeve on Aug 16, 2009 10:25 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Hungry Issac

looks like Redman drank it up!! nicccceee

is Perenialness a word? cuz if so, thats what the stillers got. perenialness

by Steelchamps !! on Aug 17, 2009 12:39 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Hey Schnifin

Thanks for the camp report! Did you pick up some Mineo’s or Aiello’s afterwards? Send some to Cali please…

When You Run The Ball Good Things Happen

by 5020 on Aug 17, 2009 9:39 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

haha

we had some Mineo’s for the Stanley Cup Finals. I actually live in Squirrel Hill but my body can only take that pounding a couple of times a year.

by schnifin on Aug 17, 2009 10:51 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Isaac Redzone

I wasn’t terribly impressed with his goal line play against the Cards, but he keeps making plays at practice. I think we may have the right carrier. Here’s hoping the line in front of him does its job.

by Varmint on Aug 17, 2009 10:04 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

It must take a lot to impress you.

As for me, anything would be an improvement over last years performance on the goaline. With our tradition of being a pounding running game, I was sorely dissapointed last year. Our anemic running game can only go up from here.

Only a life lived for others is a life worthwhile - Albert Einstein.

by fanofsteel on Aug 17, 2009 10:38 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Keep in mind...

… I’m only talking about the 2 goal line carries he had in that game. He didn’t move a pile in either of them. Thanks to good blocking, he wasn’t contacted until he was inches for the goal on the second. And blocking made a good hole for him in his first attempt. There was very little in those plays that could not have been accomplished by FWP, Mendy, or Moore.

by Varmint on Aug 17, 2009 2:00 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

+1

Redman still has a lot to prove, not the least being that he is not a special teams contributor at this point. The most important short yardage play so far in camp or preseason was the first one of the game vs. Arizona against their No. 1 defense. Mendenhall made 2-plus yards easily, partly due to good blocking and partly due to good leg drive. Redman deserves credit for making the most of his opportunities but I won’t get excited until he does it in a game against first-stringers.

by steeler.lifer on Aug 17, 2009 2:19 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

It amuses me a bit

That when we first heard about Redman in the first GL practice people said “Oh well that was against 2nd/3rd line. Let’s see him against 1st.” Then in practice he punches in 3 out of 3 attempts against the best 1st string defense in the league. Now its “Oh well, that was practice, lets see it in a game.” So, if he performs against a 1st string D in a game, what is it then? “Oh well its just preseason” Or “Well that defense isn’t any good”?

by Johnny_S on Aug 17, 2009 2:25 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

It may amuse you a bit, but it's true

There are a lot of guys who have a good camp, tear it up in preseason but aren’t as good as they appeared. Hopefully this guy ends up being a stud but we really don’t have a lot to be excited about yet. Hopefully he makes the team and hopefully he contributes but I think he still has a lot to prove before he makes the final 53.

by SteelerFan Ben on Aug 17, 2009 6:46 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

The guy can only produce in the opportunities he is put in. So far he has come up big in every one of them. I just don’t get why some people are hesitant to say “good job Redman”. Instead it’s just “Well….blah blah blah”

by Johnny_S on Aug 17, 2009 9:13 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

There was very little in those plays that could not have been accomplished by FWP, Mendy, or Moore.

I think you said this before and I disagreed with you then, and I am going to disagree with you now. This Redman seems to do better with contact than any of those three backs. The first TD he did not encounter a lot of contract but he did stand up a tackler right before the end zone. In the second carry he definitely had a lot of traffic and bodies he pounded through. I do not think the other 3 would have most certainly completed those TDs as our red zone % shows last year.

by Johnny_S on Aug 17, 2009 2:20 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I think you’re right about the order. I had them backwards.

1st TD – Redman runs for about 8-10 yards before contact. He has the opportunity to get a full head of steam before anyone connects with him. When the contact does come, it’s a guy who falls off one blocker (David Johnson) and attempts to wrap up as Redman is running past. Redman does not meet anyone head on. He’s not standing anyone up, he steps to the right as a guy falls at him from the side. This TD belongs to our blockers.

2nd TD – This is a more challenging run. Once again, the blockers open up a hole right in front of him and Redman gets a good, clean run up through the LoS. The hole closes as he makes the run, so it looks like there’s traffic, but no one is getting in his way. He makes a good solid hit at the goal line on a guy who looks to be engaged with Sherrod. The defense almost stops him in his tracks, but he is able to fall forward across the line.

The second TD is a good play for him. But it’s nothing special. At this point, I’m more impressed with his goal line activities from practice.

Last year, our RBs were getting contacted in the backfield. They were getting hit before they had the ball in their arms. The problems we had at the goal line had little to do with our running backs. Our problem was run blocking.

by Varmint on Aug 17, 2009 6:08 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I still disagree with ya.

On the first TD the guy gets his arms almost fully around Redman. He did not meet him head on, but its pretty damn close. I attached the best screen shot I could take of it. And he doesn’t “fall off” a blocker, he simply stopped engaging him and went in for the tackle. The tackler meets him before he is “running past”

The second one was definitely a good hole. I’d like to see it from Redman’s perspective, because it does not look like a big hole and a heads up move on him to find it quick and drill it. And I think it is taking a lot away from his effort to get in to say he “almost got stopped and just fell in.” He definitely fought for the extra 1-2 yards and punched it into the endzone.

by Johnny_S on Aug 17, 2009 9:11 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Video

The defender in the picture you added tries to wrap up Redman’s left leg while on his knees in the very next frame. That’s why I say he “fell off” his blocker. He throws his body to the left and ends up on the ground trying to finish the play.

When the contact is made, Redman is pushed to his right. Redman doesn’t push through the guy. He doesn’t go over the guy. He bounces to the right, which is a pretty clear indicator that the impact is not head on.

The best I can say about Redman on this play is that he maintained his balance when a guy was trying to wrap up his ankle. Redman pulled his leg free of a defender who was on the ground. That’s not a bad thing, but is that enough to separate him from the rest of our backs? I don’t think so.

On the second TD, Redman makes contact with #95 at about the 1 or 2 yard line. The defender is standing straight up and lowers his shoulder an instant before Redman connects. Redman ends the play with his upper body laying across the goal line. His feet don’t see the chalk until the play is over and he stands up. He pushed a 3rd string guy back 1 yard when he was given a 10 yard running start.

On that play, I give him credit for finding the seam as he moved past the D line. I give him credit for making the hit at the line, though I don’t think anyone is going to name a rule after it. This is the more difficult of the two TD runs, but, again, I can see any of our RBs making this play. Even FWP can move a guy one yard.

No, I like Redman because of what I’m hearing out of practice. In the Cards game, he got good blocking all the way across the LoS. There’s nothing special about his work on those plays. The good blocking was the shocker. The fact that he does this consistently against our defense is far more impressive than those two runs. So, I am more intrigued with his work in practice than this game.

by Varmint on Aug 18, 2009 1:15 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Great write-up

I totally agree with Phantaskippy if the decisions are based on skills alone. However, if they see someone doing the same job for less money, I potentially see Davis getting released. McHugh and Summers should be able to cover everything he’s currently doing. (Of course, I’m not sure what their salaries are so that may not make sense.)

Anyway, we still have three more preseason games and a lot of practice to sort this all out. From my perspective, this is the most interesting camp battle right now.

by onthebus36 on Aug 17, 2009 12:06 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Not impressed with Isaac Redman?

Did I actually see someone say that Redman wasn’t any better on the goal line than our group from last year would have been? Did you watch our backs last season? FWP, Mendenhall, Davis, none of these guys score on either run. Davis doesn’t have the push or desire, and the other guys need open space. Look back already, we haven’t been able to run in short yardage situations since the days of Bettis. Ask yourself this, When is the last time you saw one of those guys break a between the tackles, tackle, for a first down, or a TD? It’s a big reason the SB was as close as it was.

13 years and no playoff wins for the Dallas Cowboys... SWEET!

by idiscgolftexas on Aug 17, 2009 4:29 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

I agree

Scoring TD’s is not a combination of power or speed or following blocks, there is an intangible factor involved.

Anyone remember Terry Allen? He was a very good runner, but he was an all-time great on the goal line. He just got the ball in the end zone more than other people. He did it whether others would have been able to or not. Getting into the end zone from close in is a talent, I think Redman has it.

by Phantaskippy on Aug 17, 2009 4:48 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I agree with you!

How can a Steeler fan not be impressed with someone who can make short yardage in the running game?
Frankly, I’m not impressed with Mendenhall. Colbert has been pretty good with his first round picks lately, but that’s all that I can see that he has going for him. I hope he shows me more this year.

Some respect to: Dwight White, who wore 78, was an original member of the Steel Curtain, and the first Steeler to score points in a Super Bowl. He scored 2 as a safety, when he sacked Fran Tarkenton of the Vikings in Super Bowl IV. White was in the hospital with pneumonia for most of the week prior to that game, lost 20 lbs, and was not expected to play. He died in 2008.

by LongTimeSteelersFan on Aug 17, 2009 4:55 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

One thing that I can’t help but thinking about it is whether the Steelers really did their homework on Mendenhall?….

They had brought in a few other backs but Mendenhall wasn’t really a consideration since he was supposed to go much higher. I think I remember most boards had him as the second RB behind McFadden.

It could be possible that Mendenhall dropped further than it was assumed because the teams that brought him in for interviews and workouts weren’t impressed. So when the Steelers were on the clock he was clearly the best player available, so they might of been duped.

I hope it’s not the case, but it is my doom and gloom outlook on Mendenhall that I try not to think about too much.

I'll drink your Milkshake, I'll drink it up!

by drinkyourmilkshake on Aug 17, 2009 5:13 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I Agree

Mendy looks average. hope we werent duped. I m Exited about Redman : )

is Perenialness a word? cuz if so, thats what the stillers got. perenialness

by Steelchamps !! on Aug 17, 2009 5:44 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

If you are going to keep using the word you should spell it right

It’s spelled excited. What you are spelling is what someone has done after they left.

by worldtrip on Aug 17, 2009 5:51 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I remember

being totally shocked that we didn’t take an O-lineman on day 1 of the draft that year…as opposed to only being being surprised the year before when we didn’t.

I hope he does great things, but have yet to see any of them.

Some respect to: Dwight White, who wore 78, was an original member of the Steel Curtain, and the first Steeler to score points in a Super Bowl. He scored 2 as a safety, when he sacked Fran Tarkenton of the Vikings in Super Bowl IV. White was in the hospital with pneumonia for most of the week prior to that game, lost 20 lbs, and was not expected to play. He died in 2008.

by LongTimeSteelersFan on Aug 17, 2009 5:54 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

 I personally don’t think drafting RBs in the first round is great idea. Short careers, huge bust factor. Unless your getting a can’t miss like Adrian Peterson, your usually better off looking at a different position. I wasn’t a big fan of drafting Mendenhall, except that I thought it might wean us off the FWP narcotic. Needless to say it’s eighteen months later and we just gotta have more of Willie.

I will say the guy is only 22, and although I’m not a big believer in him having a really high ceiling, my guess is he will be a serviceable, if not productive back in the near future. The way we are built right now, we don’t have to have a stud back there.We need guys who can fill roles, and we may have them now. If either Summers or Redman show the heart, and ability to run in the trenches then we will have what we need. We are not built to be steelers of the nineties. The FO has neglected the O-line for too long, so I say it doesn’t matter as much if Mendenhall fails. If Ziggy Hood fails however, were in trouble. The same can be said for Woodley, and Timmons. If those guys fail, we are up a creek without a paddle. Some misses are worse than others.

13 years and no playoff wins for the Dallas Cowboys... SWEET!

by idiscgolftexas on Aug 17, 2009 10:24 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Mendenhall and Sweed were luxury picks. We didn’t need instant help, or at least it wasn’t there where we could have used it.

So they draft 2 guys who fell and have some larger bust factor but really high upside.

If they fail, well we won the Super Bowl and we still don’t need Sweed or Mendy to start, so I don’t think we’re very bad off if they turn out to be busts.

If one of them reaches their potential (both could be pro bowlers if they pan out) we get a great return on those two draft picks. If they both turn out, we will be stacked.

The year before we took a luxury pick with Timmons, it took him several seasons to develop but he’s good.

Dennis Dixon too. The Steelers right now seem to be splitting the draft between guys that are more NFL ready but have lower upside and guys with all kinds of talent, but questions as to whether they will make the transition to being great NFL players.

I like that strategy, especially right now where no one is breaking into the starting line-up as a rookie, but we will need new starters in a few years.

by Phantaskippy on Aug 18, 2009 5:45 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Some good thoughts

I think you’re right about running backs only needing to fill some roles. Where I would disagree is that I think ou’re being overly negative at this point about Mendenhall, and by inference (“FWP narcotic”) Willie Parker, too. Parker has always been more than the sum of his parts. That’s the beauty of his story. If you break down his game, there are a lot of things that he doesn’t do well. The reality though is that he’s been a very productive back in his short NFL career. You don’t put up the kind of numbers he has without being a good running back. Mendenhall might be equally frustrating for you because at this point he is less than the sum of his parts. He has considerably more athletic and running ability than Parker, but he has yet to establish a style or running back personality that indicates he can be successful over a period of time. To that I can only say you need to give him some time. He was pretty impressive in his only start to date, last year against the Ravens, until he was injured. He ran with a strong burst and vision that was startling. His second run that game went for 12 yards, right up the gut, through a maze of players. He had something like 25 yards rushing on the Steelers first scoring drive that game. I’ve seen enough to make me think he can be successful but he has to show the tenacity and toughness that all good running backs have, and which Parker has in spades. I totally understand why some people have their doubts but I have high expectations for the running game this year and for Mendenhall’s future. Time will tell.

by steeler.lifer on Aug 18, 2009 12:01 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

He needs to get back to just running. He’s looking for an opening instead of hitting the hole that works against college kids that will make mistakes or leave their lane to make a play, then you cut back into the hole they just made.

It doesn’t work in the NFL (or against good college defenses for that matter). The thing is he didn’t run like that before. He was a very instinctive runner, and now he is running timid.

If he can’t get that back soon he’s gonna waste this season and make it much harder on himself.

by Phantaskippy on Aug 18, 2009 4:36 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

He played very little last year

What you call timidity is what I call adjusting to game speed and live action after nearly 11 months away from the field and very little game action overall last year. He played less football last year than anyone else in camp not named Charlie Batch. I’d also prefer a running back who hesitates and finds a hole than a running back who runs hard up the ass of an o-lineman who is two yard in the backfield. He did okay last week, nothing special by any means but he had four or five productive runs and shook off some rust. Now he has to take a step forward from that.

by steeler.lifer on Aug 18, 2009 7:49 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I don’t think we got duped on Mendy at all. He was widely made the number 2 back in the draft, had an extremely productive college career etc. He hasn’t played enough to really judge what he can do..

by mojo88 on Aug 18, 2009 12:16 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

      You’re right regarding my feelings on FWP. It’s impressive what he’s been able to do as an undrafted rookie. My ultimate issue with him is that by virtue of his journey many have put him in an elite class. In my opinion he’s always been best suited as peice of the running game, not the whole enchilada. He’s almost never run well against good football teams. You can say that’s the difference between good teams, and bad teams, but he’s often times a zero factor. Just my thoughts…

13 years and no playoff wins for the Dallas Cowboys... SWEET!

by idiscgolftexas on Aug 18, 2009 7:41 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs


User Tools

Welcome to BTSC, a blog dedicated to the SIX-time world champion Steelers.

"Thoughtful discussion with a sense of history."

Art Rooney Jr.

"Level-headed thinking." Pittsburgh Post-Gazette

Start posting about the Steelers »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

Comcast NFL RedZone Moments from SB Nation

Music City Miracles
Tennessee Titans Red Zone Report
Bleeding Green Nation
Comcast NFL Red Zone stat of the week - Something doesn't have to give
Niners Nation
49ers Red Zone numbers: How effective are they?

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Steelers_small
A Day In The Life Of Punxsutawney Polamalu!
Small
Four Things I Learned From the Super Bowl
Bobby_ray_small
NFL Opinions - wanted or not
Small
BTSC 2010 NFL Mock Drafts : Updated 02/06 (4 round edition)
Steelers_brushback_l_small
Football-related Pet Peeves

Recent FanPosts

Small
Alternate Theory: Draft version, What If?
Rayray_small
SB Weekend Wrap from Miami - Football Stuff
200px-siickeywoods_small
New friends and foes in the AFCN
Rayray_small
SB Weekend Wrap from Miami - Parties
Gildon002_small
Lame ass Fans ..
Small
What does your Mock Draft look like?
051211_bettis_hmed_130p
Non-Footyball related Movies! (Martial arts/Kung Fu)

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Latest NFL Headlines from SB Nation

Arrowhead Pride
Former Chiefs WR Jeff Webb Gets A Workout With The Ravens
Windy City Gridiron
Are the Bears going backwards?
Big Blue View
Eli talks Peyton, Super Bowl

SPONSORS


Site Founder & Editor

Me2_small Blitzburgh

Steelers Historian

Steeler_small maryrose

Bringing You Your Daily Six Pack

Plainview_small drinkyourmilkshake